WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development
Print ISSN: 1790-5079, E-ISSN: 2224-3496
Volume 21, 2025
Integrity Evaluation Procedure of an Incinerator Treating Explosive Wastes (Case Study)
Authors: , ,
Abstract: Military munitions undergo both chemical and mechanical degradation over time, rendering them unsafe for use or storage. This degradation underscores the urgent need for demilitarization through methods such as physical destruction. Incineration, a key demilitarization technique, involves burning munitions at high temperatures in specialized facilities. This process effectively destroys the chemical components of explosives, reducing them to ash and gases, which can be further treated to minimize environmental impact. Albania, heavily militarized until 1991, faced significant safety and stability risks due to vast stockpiles of weapons following the collapse of its dictatorship. Incineration was chosen as an effective method for demilitarization. To ensure the safe and efficient operation of incineration facilities, adherence to international standards and European regulations is critical. Scheduled inspections and maintenance are essential for maintaining safety and operational efficiency. This article evaluates the integrity of an incinerator at the Military Explosive Plant of Mjekes in Albania, focusing on the cylindrical shell of the rotary kiln furnace, surface conditions, internal structure, and deformation. We propose the implementation of specific non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, including surface and volumetric testing of the rotary kiln furnace shell. These methods enhance integrity evaluation protocols, enabling early identification of potential issues and contributing to the safety, efficiency, lifespan, and regulatory compliance of waste incineration operations.
Search Articles
Keywords: Demilitarization plant, hazardous waste incineration, rotary kiln furnace, non-destructive testing (NDT), structural discontinuities, material defects, wall thickness loss, structural integrity assessment, periodic inspection protocols
Pages: 927-936
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2025.21.77