Forest Conservation and Social Welfare: The Legal Perspective of
Society-Based Forest Resource Management in Ngawi Regency,
Indonesia
MUHAMMAD TAUFAN BADOLLAHI, MURNIATI RUSLAN, ARIEF BUDIONO, ANDI
SUKMAWATI ASSAAD, SIGIT SAPTO NUGROHO, SITI NURKHAERAH
Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta,
Jalan A. Yani, Mendungan, Pabelan, Kec. Kartasura, Sukoharjo Regency, Central Java, 57102,
INDONESIA
Corresponding Authors: Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN),
Datokarama Palu, INDONESIA
Abstract: - Forest management in Java currently tends to be centralized. It is implemented in a top-down manner
with state-based forest resource management, causing conflicts in the community. Thus, there needs to be a
new paradigm, which is society-based forest management. The objective of this research is to analyze the
society-based forest management in Ngawi Regency, East Java, Indonesia from a legal perspective. The legal
perspective of society-based forest management is the essence of this policy because, without legal support, the
management would be illegal. This study used the socio-legal research approach, with a naturalistic qualitative
method. The results show that from the perspective of the legal implications, society-based forest management
brings society benefits in the economic aspect. Such a benefit encourages society to protect the forest because it
is more profitable for them if the forest is protected rather than destroyed. In the social aspect, it increases the
welfare of the people. There is also legal certainty in the form of a cooperation agreement between the
company and the forest farmers. In the ecological aspect, it contributes to forest preservation as forests are
better maintained.
Key-Words: - forest, society-based, management, welfare, conservation, legal perspective, Indonesia.
Received: April 26, 2022. Revised: January 18, 2023. Accepted: February 14, 2023. Published: March 7, 2023.
1 Introduction
Indonesian forest areas are known as the lungs of
the world. Unfortunately, they are challenged with
deforestation and land degradation, causing
international and national concerns. Worse, in many
areas, forest resource management is rampant with
conflicts.
In Java Island, Indonesia, forest resource
management is managed by Perum Perhutani (the
General Company of State Forestry, i.e., the
Indonesian governmental body which manages
forest areas in Indonesia) since 1972, [1].
Perhutani’s role is to implement policies in
managing the state’s forests so that the state may
obtain foreign exchange. It also aims to bring
optimum benefits to the company, the society, the
development of the national economy, and the
ideology of forest control, [2]. This mandate is
granted by the state and is regulated in the Republic
of Indonesia’s Governmental Decree No. 72 of
2012 regarding the General Company of State
Forestry (Perum Perhutani). Unfortunately, there is
a staggering rate of issues associated with forest
destruction and deforestation in this country. From
a historical aspect, the forest resource in Java has
been managed since the colonial era. Yet, until
now, in the socio-economic aspect, it has not
provided optimum benefit to the society’s welfare,
[3], [4], [5], [6].
Timber theft and plant destruction are not the
only causes of destruction and losses in forests. But
many factors lead deforestation to happen. In
carrying out the forest development in Java, Perum
Perhutani’s main goal is uniting the interests of
forest resource conservation and the interest of
increasing the welfare of villagers that reside around
the forest,[7].
In implementing forest management, some
external problems must be faced, such as limited
work opportunities and poverty in the villages.
Meanwhile, the internal problems include the
companies’ feudalistic and bureaucratic culture as
well as the human resources’ level of
professionalism. These problems result in conflicts
between Perum Perhutani and the people around the
forests.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
122
Volume 22, 2023
This condition is inseparable from the interests in
forest management and exploitation to fulfill the
state’s economic ambition to increase foreign
exchange. The preamble of the Constitution No. 41
of 1999 regarding Forestry explains that the forest is
a capital of national development which has real
benefits to the life of Indonesians. These include
ecologic, sociocultural, and economic benefits that
must be balanced and dynamic. Because of that, the
forest must be sustainably managed, taken care of,
protected, and utilized for the welfare of the current
and future generations of the Indonesian people.
In the context of regional autonomy, in managing
forest resources, Perum Perhutani must change the
state-based paradigm, [8], into that which is society-
based, [9], [10]. Thus, it must coordinate and
cooperate with regional governments to create areal
planning, formulate policies, and organize
empowerment programs for the villagers who live
around the forests. To apply that work plan, there
must genuine partnership between the Perum
Perhutani, stakeholders, forest village society,
business owners, non-governmental organizations,
and universities.
Since Perhutani established a social program
with a prosperity approach, social forestry has been
rampant with conflicts. The peak of this conflict
happened during the Reformation Era when there
were cases of forest looting. Such a case also
happened in Ngawi Regency, East Java Province.
From 1998 to 2001, forest looting escalated,
reaching around 6000 ha. To handle this case,
Perum Perhutani issued a policy on society-based
forest resource management based on the Decree of
the Head of Perum Perhutani’s Supervisory
Assemblage, which was then renewed with the
Director’s Decree No: 268/KPTS/DIR/2007
regarding Society-Based Forest Resource
Management Plus.
Based on the description above, the problem of
this research is: How is the legal perspective of the
society-based forest resource management in Ngawi
Regency to achieve social welfare?
2 Research Method
To analyze this paper, the authors used the socio-
legal research method. The socio-legal research
method was field-based research. With this
approach, the law is positioned as a social symptom
that needs acceptance from the public, because
without acceptance from the public, the law is just
some text without any meaning. It connects the
reality of the actions of individuals and people with
the law. In the socio-legal approach, a phenomenon
is not solved by merely providing information on the
legal stipulations. But it must be combined with
approaches from other perspectives, [11], [12], [13].
This is qualitative research that profoundly and
comprehensively analyzes data, [14].
The qualitative (naturalistic) research contains
the following basic considerations:
a) This research analyzes society-based forest
resource management based on natural settings,
b) The researcher acts as a research instrument,
c) This research describes and provides an
interpretation of the data found in the field, and
d) This research analyzes the phenomena found in
the data in the field.
After the data was collected and analyzed, they
were then described in the form of sentences, to
obtain a detailed, complete, and clear description of
the research problem, [15].
The primary data of this research were obtained
from observing the field or the society around the
forest and their socio-cultural conditions. Then, the
researcher obtained secondary data from journals,
books, and other sources such as laws, treaties and
jurisprudence.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 The Forest Condition in Ngawi Regency
Geographically, the Ngawi Regency is located in the
western area of the East Java province, which
borders the Central Java province. The width of this
regency is 1.298,58 km2. Around 39% of the area,
or 504,8 km2 is wet rice field land. In the
administrative aspect, it is divided into 19 districts
and 217 villages, where 4 out of the 217 villages are
sub-districts. In the aspect of territorial
administration, Ngawi Regency is divided into 17
districts, 4 sub-districts, and 213 villages.
In 2012, the number of people living in Ngawi
Regency was around 865,627 people, consisting of
423,083 males and 442,544 females. On average,
there are 3,94 members in a family. The population
density is 668 people per kilometer square.
The width of the Ngawi Regency area is 1.295,98
km2, with a topographic stretch of 25 m to 1000m
above sea level. In the aspect of land use, 50,644 ha
(35,19%) of the Ngawi Regency land is used as
people’s agricultural land. It has yards with a width
of 18,075 ha (12,89%), 14,744 ha (8,67%) of moors,
2,632 ha (3,33%) of plantations, 45,428.6 ha
(50,63%) of state forests, and 3,712.9 ha (4,47%) of
people’s forests. Generally, Ngawi is categorized
into climate C according to Schmidt and Fergusson,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
123
Volume 22, 2023
because it is dominated by lowland plains, and
agricultural land, [16].
Regarding the areal condition of Ngawi Regency,
almost fifty percent of its area is a forest area, which
is managed by three Forest Management Units
(Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan/KPH). They border
other Forest Management Units, such as the
Padangan Forest Management Unit, the Bojonegoro
Forest Management Unit, the Purwodadi Forest
Management Unit, and the Randublatung Forest
Management Unit. Administratively, the three Forest
Management Units which manage the forest area in
Ngawi Regency are as follows:
1. Ngawi Forest Management Unit manages
44.500 hectares of forest land, including ±
35.000 hectares of productive forest which
produces teak, and ± 25 hectares of protected
forest.
2. Lawu Forest Management Unit, with 7.737,60
hectares of forest area, consists of 2.210 hectares
of productive forest with pine trees as the main
plants and 5.527,60 hectares of protected forest,
with jungle plants and pine trees.
3. Sadaran Forest Management Unit with 2.037,1
hectares of forest area. It consists of 2.035,90
hectares of productive forest with teaks as the
main plants and 1,20 hectares of protected
forest. In the forest area of the Sadaran Forest
Management Unit, there are two water dams,
i.e., the Pondok dam and the Sangiran dam.
3.2 Conflict of the Bringin Forest in Ngawi
Regency
The Forest Management Sub-Unit (Bagian Kesatuan
Pemangkuan Hutan/BKPH) of Bringin is part of the
Sadaran Forest Management Unit area. It is an area
of Ngawi Regency which experienced massive forest
looting between 1998 and 2001. At that time, 931,8
hectares of forest were looted, with a timbre volume
of 394.738,508 m3. The looted areas included plots
of land planted with trees that were categorized as
level IV to VIII aged wood. The losses are not
limited to the elimination of the forest’s components,
but the looting process also took the lives of people
and the apparatus. This cannot be separated from the
economic crises which put people under pressure.
This caused them to feel the need to obtain free
resources from the forests.
People did not have access to the forest’s natural
resources. This caused outbursts of people’s anger,
making them obtain the forest’s resources through
looting. Perhutani’s total loss due to forest looting
was as follows:
1. In the Bringin Forest Management Sub-Unit,
the width of the forest looted was 931,8
hectares, with a total timbre volume of
394.738,508 m3;
2. In the Rejuno Forest Management Sub-Unit,
the width of the forest looted was 988,2
hectares, with a total timbre volume of
329.628 m3; and
3. In the Pajaran Forest Management Sub-Unit,
the width of the forest looted was 823,4
hectares, with a total timbre volume of
751.850 m3.
But worse than that, the forests’ condition
experienced terrible degradation. During the period
where looting escalated from 1998 to 2001, the
accumulative area of Ngawi’s looted forests both in
the highland and lowland plains was ± 6.000
hectares.
The state-based forest resource management
applied by Perhutani caused people who live
surrounding the forests to feel marginalized. They
had no access to the forest's natural resources and
they cannot obtain any benefit from them. The
looting was a form of the "society's reaction" to use
the forests' natural resources which must be viewed
as a normal phenomenon. But, if this looting
reaction tends to create forest degradation and
ecosystem destruction, a solution must quickly be
found. It must be considered that most of the people
in that area are forest farmers whose lives depend on
the arable land given by Perhutani with the
intercropping system. Thus, so far, the forest
farmers’ activities are limited to contract workers
who plant teak trees for two years with the
intercropping system. After two years, they must
leave their share of the land. Since that time, people's
access to the forest is closed. This system causes the
people to be marginalized as they have no access to
supplies of needs that were formerly obtained from
the forest. The low ownership of land causes the
people surrounding the forest to become poor. It
causes a higher level of dependency, making them
have more interaction with the forest area, [17].
Based on the research results on the issue
between poverty and the forestry sector in Ngawi
Regency, the causes of this phenomenon are as
follows: (1) Perhutani’s policies regarding the work
contract with a period of 2 to 3 years cause the poor
people who do not have land stay poor when the
arable land contract is over, (2) around the forest, the
land consists of badlands. Thus, people’s plants that
are grown there have low productivity, causing
people’s income to also be low, (3) there is low
ownership of land, as most of the available land is
owned by people who have a good economic
condition. Because most people do not have land to
work on and there is a lack of development
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
124
Volume 22, 2023
programs, there is a limited number of work
opportunities, (4) there is looting or illegal logging,
which is caused by the policies which are not
society-friendly. There is low law enforcement, thus
the people around the forest lost their sources of
income, (5) The poor people who live around the
Perhutani forests do not usually obtain any guarantee
of having their basic physical needs fulfilled. Yet,
they have low access to the forest natural resources,
(6) The poor people who live around the forest are
not involved in formulating forest management
policies, and (7) there is the tradition/ritual of
contribution called adat hajatan, which causes a lot
of expenses. Thus, it decreases the amount of money
that may be allocated to people's basic needs. It also
causes them to have debt to other parties.
There must be innovative strategies to decrease
the rate of poverty associated with forest natural
resources. The state-based forest resource
management model must be shifted into that which
is society-based. The efforts to decrease poverty
associated with the forestry sector must be well-
planned. The main points of this new forest resource
management model are as follows:
(1) There must be an increase in society's position
in influencing forest management. With an increased
societal position, society can be empowered. Thus,
they are not in a desperate position which makes
them have no choice but to loot the forest.
(2) There must be a mutual commitment between
the people, the Regional Government, and the
Perhutani in creating forest management that is
sustainable, just, and democratic. This must be
encouraged because the commitment between all of
these parties can create mutual prosperity as they can
each benefit from the preserved forest.
(3) There must be the protection of the poor
people’s rights to access the benefits of the forests’
resources. By granting the people the right to access
forest resources, they can gain better economic
welfare. It would be more beneficial for the poor
people if they can harvest forest honey, tree saps,
and grass. They can sell honey and sap. Then, they
can use the grass to feed their cattle. Next, they can
farm in the forest or collect forest fruit to increase
their economic income.
(4) There must be the participation of the forest
village people in formulating the policies regarding
the forest natural resources which uphold the
principles of justice and sustainability. This is so that
the law can truly cater to the needs of the people that
live around the forest as they are the ones whose
lives depend on these forests.
3.3 The Legal Perspective of People’s
Cooperation in the Forest Natural Resource
Management in Ngawi Regency
In the regional autonomy era, one of the
developmental visions and missions of Ngawi
Regency is to increase the welfare of the people as
optimally and as quickly as possible through the
optimization of all potentials, including natural
resource and human resource potentials. With
regional autonomy, the forestry sector's role must be
increased to solve the problems in regional
development. There must be basic changes in forest
management, from that which is centralistic to that
which is decentralized. This may be implemented by
giving more power to the regions in managing forests
in a democratic, participative, and transparent manner.
It must have an orientation toward the people's
welfare. The spirit of regional autonomy is the
starting point for increasing the roles of the regional
government, the people, and other stakeholders in
managing the state forest. This is to create a forest
management model which is sustainable, just, and
democratic to increase people's welfare.
There are some obstacles in encouraging the roles
of the regional government and the people in forest
resource management. It includes the institutional
problem of forest managers where it does not run as it
should. The existence of the Regional Government
Constitution has not yet holistically resolved the
dualism problem of the institutions which manage the
forests in the regions. These two institutions are the
Regional Forestry Service, which has the
responsibility to manage forests outside the state
forest territory, and Perum Perhutani, which has the
responsibility to manage the state forests. With such
conditions, the regional government and the society
do not yet have full access to be involved in managing
the state forests. Villagers surrounding the forests
cannot proportionally use the forest's natural resource
potential, even though they highly depend on the
forest area.
The effort to elaborate the institutions in the
forest resource management of Ngawi Regency is
carried out through some commitments, which are:
(1) The commitment of the Ngawi Regency
government to not acquire the assets and roles of
Perum Perhutani; (2) Giving optimum roles to the
parties in implementing the Decree
136/Kpts/Dir/2001 on the society-based forest
management; (3) the formation of the Ngawi
Regency Society-Based Forest Management
Communication Forum through the Regent’s Decree
No. 188/26/415.011/2003 on March 14th, 2003; and
also (4) growing society’s awareness on carrying out
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
125
Volume 22, 2023
disaster mitigation to prevent actions and behaviors
which destroy the environment and the forests.
The Ngawi Regency government issued the
society-based forest management program for the
first time in 2003, which was the result of
cooperation between the stakeholders of the Ngawi
Regency. These stakeholders are the Ngawi Regency
Government, Ngawi Forest Management Unit,
Sadaran Forest Management Unit, and Lawu Forest
Management Unit. As a pilot project, the society-
based forest management program was carried out
at twelve villages, which were spread over four
Forest Management Sub-Units and three Forest
Management Units. Administratively, these villages
were located in four Districts which were facilitated
by non-governmental organizations, i.e., the Bintara
Yogyakarta and LeSEHan Madiun. The village areas
facilitated by the Bintara Yogyakarta non-
governmental organization were as follows: four
villages of 49 hectares under the Ngawi Forest
Management Unit, two villages with an area of 45,5
hectares under the Sadaran Forest Management
Unit, and three villages in Lawu Forest
Management Unit with the area of 22,5 hectares.
Meanwhile, the three villages in the Sadaran Forest
Management Unit with an area of 425,7 hectares
were facilitated by the LeSEHan Madiun non-
governmental organization. To support these
facilitating activities, each non-governmental
organization sought income from donor institutions.
The Ngawi Regency government has only so far
supported the funds for meeting activities and
socialization.
After running for one year, to push the
acceleration of the society-based forest management
implementation in Ngawi Regency, there was a
cooperation agreement between the Ngawi Regency
government; Ngawi Forest Management Unit,
Sadaran Forest Management Unit, Lawu Forest
Management Unit of Perum Perhutani; and non-
governmental organizations (Bintara non-
governmental organization, Lesehan non-
governmental organization, Pinbuk non-
governmental organization, and Prima non-
governmental organizations) regarding the society-
based forest management on May 26th, 2004.
In this cooperation agreement, the Ngawi
Regency government was regarded as the first party.
The second party was Perum Perhutani, and the third
party consisted of non-governmental organizations.
In that agreement, the first party was obliged to
provide facilities, infrastructure, licensing, and the
budget needed to support and ease the establishment
of activities according to the capability of the Ngawi
Regency Regional Budget and Expenditures. Then,
the second party was responsible to provide facilities
and infrastructure, licensing, and the budget needed
to support and ease the establishment of activities.
Lastly, the third party was responsible to organize
the development, coaching, and technical or non-
technical coaching to the people who live in the
location where the society-based forest management
is applied.
Then, the supporting policies of the society-
based forest management in Ngawi Regency are
classified into two policy groups, which are:
a. District-level policies. At this level, some
Regency Decrees issued were as follows:
1. Ngawi Regency Decree No.
188/26/415.011/2003 on March 14th, 2003
regarding the Society-Based Forest
Management Forum of Ngawi Regency.
2. The cooperation agreement of the Ngawi
Regency No. 522/06/PK/415.011/2004 on May
26th, 2004 which involved the Ngawi Forest
Management Unit, the Sadaran Forest
Management Unit, the Lawu Forest
Management Unit of Perum Perhutani and
developmental non-governmental
organizations.
3. Decree of the Ngawi Regent No.
188/295/404.013/2007 on June 18th, 2007
regarding the Ngawi Regency Society-Based
Forest Management Forum.
b. Technical operational policies. Some decrees
were issued by the Head of the Forestry and
Plantation Service, which are:
1. Decree of the Head of the Forestry and
Plantation Service of Ngawi Regency No.
821.2/471/404.104/2006 on June 29th, 2006
regarding the Facilitated Village Area and the
Main Roles of Forestry and Plantation
Instructors.
2. Decree of the Head of the Forestry and
Plantation Service of Ngawi Regency No.
522/108/404.104/2007 on February 1st, 2007
regarding the Agreement of the Society-Based
Forest Management Instructor of 2007 in
Ngawi Regency.
3. Warrant No. 522/117/404.104/2007 on
February 9th, 2007 to the Society-Based Forest
Management Instructor of Ngawi Regency.
4. Decree of the Head of the Forestry and
Plantation Service of Ngawi Regency No.
522/192/404.104/2007 on February 28th, 2007
regarding the Agreement of the Institutional
Strengthening Activity of the Society-Based
Forest Management of Ngawi Regency Team
Coordination Program, the Budget Year of
2007.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
126
Volume 22, 2023
Referring to the policies above, there are many
related services that were involved in establishing
Society-Based Forest Management, such as the Food
and Horticulture Plant Service; Animal Service;
Environmental, Mining, and Energy Service;
Cooperative Service, Industrial and Trade Service;
Societal Empowerment Service; the National Unity
and Societal Protection; Head of the Food Security
and Agricultural Instruction Agency, etc.
From the results of the study, it is shown that
some factors encourage the establishment of society-
based forest management in Ngawi Regency as
follows:
1. The people who live around the forests have the
awareness and willingness to rebuild their forests
which were destroyed and deteriorated due to
looting. This is because their lives are very
dependent on the forest products, such as the need
for arable land to plant on with the intercropping
system. They also need comestibles such as
firewood to be sold and leaves for feeding the
cattle which are their sources of income. With the
destruction of the forest, they cannot use forest
products anymore. This causes them to become
poor.
2. Ngawi Regency’s forest areas, especially the
Bringin Forest Management Sub-Unit is a buffer
zone for the continuity and the sustainability of the
Pondok dam which is already threatened. The
condition is that there is a decrease in the dam's
water capacity. This makes it difficult for people to
find clean water during the dry season. They also
have trouble watering their crop for irrigation. As
the forest is destroyed, there are often cases of
natural disasters such as floods and landslides.
Thus, it forces people to be more aware. It
encourages them to rebuild their forest with
society-based forest resource management.
3. The society-based forest resource management
provides products and a profit-sharing mechanism
for the resources obtained from the forest. It
motivates the forest farmers to be more aware and
more enthusiastic even though it needs a rather
long time. Before the society-based forest resource
management, the people may only manage the
arable land for two years with the intercropping
mechanism. And then, they must leave the land as
the people’s access to the forest is closed.
Meanwhile, the factors which become the
obstacle to establishing society-based forest
resource management are as follows:
1. There is a lack of socialization on the society-
based forest resource management by Perhutani
as the location is hard to access. This is because
the area consists of hills that may only be
accessed through footpaths. Thus, it makes it
hard for the officers to provide socialization.
Apart from that, the people around the forest lack
education. Thus, they do not understand society-
based forest resource management. This makes
them unable to comprehend their rights and
responsibilities in that program, causing them to
have various perceptions and thoughts regarding
the forest. They only understand that there is only
the intercropping program, where after two years,
they must leave the arable land and their access
to the forest is closed.
2. Before the society-based forest management
program was established, a lot of budgets were
allocated for the management of forest
resources, starting from land clearing until the
planting process. There was also a need for
subsidized fertilizers and seedlings. Because the
company's financial condition is limited, the
budget allocated for forest management is
minimized as much as possible. This makes
people reluctant to participate in forest
management. Apart from that, the pesanggem
(the people who have the responsibility to work
on the arable land of Perhutani’s forests) also
have a limited understanding of society-based
forest management. This is because the
Perhutani has not given enough socialization
regarding this program.
3. The arable land which must be worked on is
much too wide compared to the number of
pesanggem. Thus, they prefer working on
arable land which is closer to their houses or
their residence. This is so that it is easier to
supervise the land. Thus, the shared land which
is located far away will be abandoned. It is not
taken care of properly; thus the success level of
the principal plants’ is terrible. Apart from that,
there were some cases where the pesanggem
fought over more fertile lands.
4. Usually, only aged pesanggem are enthusiastic
about working on the arable land. Meanwhile,
young people prefer working in big cities such
as Surabaya and Jakarta. They also prefer
working as Indonesian Migrant Workers
overseas, as they are promised a higher income
compared to being forest farmers.
5. The texture of the arable land is not very fertile.
It is rocky and chalky. The topography consists
of hills. Thus, a lot of budget is needed to work
on the arable land to produce maximum
farming results. Yet, the workers still have
trouble fulfilling their daily living expenses.
Thus, this will influence the success level of the
plants.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
127
Volume 22, 2023
6. The pesanggem still has trouble marketing their
farm products. Moreover, at harvest time, the
prices of farming products tend to drop, thus the
money obtained is not enough to cover the
production cost. Because of that, there is a
cooperative which collects the farmer's
products and buys them at a stable price.
Based on the research results, it can be seen that
society-based forest management has not yet run
well. In the aspect of legal effectivity, there are
some factors that cause this to happen. There are
four components of the legal system which must
be known regarding the operation of the legal
system as a process:
a. The structure of the legal system component
consists of interrelated legal institutions,
including the law-making institutions, the court
institutions and their structure, and other related
agencies.
b. The substance of the legal system component
consists of the legal regulations and the legal
decisions produced by the lawmakers or the
government.
c. The culture of the legal system component. It
consists of a set of values and behaviors which
are related to the law.
d. Facilities and infrastructure.
These four components are interrelated and they
influence one another. But the central point is the
legal culture. This is because the legal culture
contains principal things which become the
characteristics of a society. This character will then
give contents to the substance which becomes the
basis of the regulations. Historically, there is a
chance that the substance is formed by the legal
structure, [3].
The obstacle in social life which causes the
minimum awareness of the law is the lack of legal
communication. According to Friedman as quoted
by [3], legal communication is a principal
requirement of the legal system. Not one person
can behave according to the law if he/she does not
know the contents of the law. Legal communication
has certain aims, including creating a mutual
understanding so that there is a change in thoughts,
behaviors, and actions. Legal communication in
societal life is connected to the legal socialization
process. This process is needed so that the people
act according to the applicable legal stipulations.
The law is hoped to carry out its important role in
regulating the actions of society. Because of that,
there needs to be an understanding of how the
awareness of the law and how the sense of justice
develops and grows in society, and how far the law
can influence actions.
Based on the writer’s analysis, there are some
differences between the condition before and after
the society-based forest management program was
applied.
Before society-based forest management, the
condition was as follows:
a. There was still a gap in the partnership between
the people/pesanggem and the Perhutani
officials. There is no good communication as
there was a patron-client relationship and the
policies were applied top-down.
b. The forest farmer groups were not yet
organized. The groups were made based on the
division of the plots of land formed by
Perhutani.
c. The programs were not clear and the forest
farmers were individualistic.
d. The forest farmers had a depleting trust in the
Perhutani officials, as the officials had the
tendency to act arrogantly. They also used the
approach of becoming like security guards.
e. The period of arable land management rights for
the farmers from the Perhutani was limited to 2-
3 years. If the plants are already tall, they must
move so the farmers’ access to the forest is
closed.
f. Forest farmer groups did not make any
regulations to regulate their own mechanisms.
Farmer associations in the Forest Farmer Group
were not yet strengthened.
g. There was a low insight into the organization
and the society tended to be isolated.
h. The forest’s sustainability was not guaranteed.
The security of the forest resources was a
complete burden of Perhutani.
After the society-based forest management, the
condition is as follows:
a. There is already an equal partnership between
the pesanggem and the Perhutani, which is a
mutualism symbiosis.
b. There is the strengthening of the forest farmer
groups which are organized by the Forest
Resource Management Society or the Forest
Farmer Groups.
c. There are scheduled meetings between the
committee and the members of the Forest
Farmer Groups, the Perhutani officials, and the
local Head of the Village which strengthen the
communication between them. It also
strengthens the institution.
d. There is a change in behavior. The parties
formed a relationship of mutualism and they
have the feeling of being on the same boat.
e. The forest farmers have started to grow trust in
the Perhutani officials.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
128
Volume 22, 2023
f. There is a guarantee for the Perhutani forest land
and arable land management rights until the end
of the planting cycle. There is also a sharing
system for forest products.
g. There is a plan for an open organization. The
people around the forest start to form
relationships with external organizations. They
obtained coaching from non-governmental
organizations and other parties who have an
awareness of this issue.
h. There is a growing awareness of the importance
of forest sustainability with the security system
which becomes the responsibility of the
Perhutani officials and the Forest Resource
Management Society officials and members.
i. The bargaining power of the forest farmers or
pesanggem increased.
4 Conclusion
From the legal perspective, society-based forest
management implies the economic aspect, where
forest farmers can tend to wider arable land and
gain benefits from it. Thus, the economic needs
and the welfare of the people around the forest are
guaranteed. Then, in the social aspect, the people's
welfare is increased. There is legal certainty in the
relations between Perhutani and the forest farmers
(pesanggem) through the cooperation agreement
on the management of the forest resources, thus
the rights and responsibilities are clear. In the
ecological aspect, there are protective and
regulative functions for the forest as an ecosystem.
Thus, the forest natural resources’ quality is
sustainable. The environment is also guaranteed to
bring welfare to the people.
Acknowledgement:
The author would like to thank to Uin Datokarama,
Palu.
References:
[1] Supriyadi, B. E., Hukum Agraria Kehutanan,
Aspek Hukum Pertanahan Dalam Pengelolaan
Hutan Negara (The Forestry Agrarian Law,
The Legal Aspect of Land in the Management
of State Forests), Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Persada, 2013.
[2] Peluso, N. L., Rich Forests Poor People,
Berkeley-Los Angeles-Oxford: University of
California Press, 1992.
[3] Nugroho, S. S. Model Pengembangan Desa
Konservasi Berbasis Pendayagunaan Potensi
Lokal Kawasan Lindung Lereng Gunung Wilis
Kabupaten Madiun Jawa Timur (The Village
Conservation Development Model Based on
Local Potentials in the Protected Area of the
Foot of the Willis Mountain, Madiun regency,
East Java), Research Grant Report for the
Indonesian Directory of High Education, 2014.
[4] Nugroho, S. S., Pengelolaan Hutan Berbasis
Kemakmuran Rakyat: Konstruksi Hukum
Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Berbasis
Masyarakat (Social Welfare-Based Forest
Management: A Legal Construction of Society-
Based Forest Resource Management),
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kebijakan
Perspektif Hukum, Ponorogo: Universitas
Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, 2017, p. 127.
[5] Nurjaya, I. N., Magersari: Studi Kasus Pola
Hubungan Kerja Penduduk Setempat Dalam
Pengusahaan Hutan (Magersari: A Case Study
of the Work Relationship Pattern of Local
Citizens in Forest Businesses), Jakarta:
Universitas Indonesia, 2001.
[6] Subadi, & Nugroho, S. S., Model Mega Wana
Agrowisata Kawasan Hutan Berbasis
Pemberdayaan Potensi Lokal di Lereng
Gunung Wilis Kabupaten Madiun Jawa Timur
(The Forest Area Agrotourism Mega Wana
Based on Local Potential Empowerment at the
Foot of Willis Mountain, Madiun Regency,
East Java), Research Grant Report for the
Indonesian Directory of High Education,
2012.
[7] Setiahadi, R., Modal Sosial dalam
Pembangunan Kehutanan: Penyelesaian
Deforestasi dan Konflik PHBM (Social Capital
in Forest Development: Resolving
Deforestation and PHBM Conflicts),
Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada, 2012.
[8] Maryudi, A., Restoring State Control Over
Forest Resources Through Administrative
Procedures: Evidence from a Community
Forestry Programme in Central Java,
Indonesia, ASEAS Austrian Journal of South-
East Asian Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012, pp.
229242.
[9] Alauddin, R, Rosidi, I, Aziz, A. D.P., Sangaji,
I., Environmental Legal Responsibility Of
Non-Metal And Rock Mining Business
Persons In Sharia Perspective: Study In The
City Of Tidore Islands. Journal of
Transcendental Law UMS, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp
90-97
[10] Nath, T. K., Inoue, M., & Pretty, J., Formation
and Function of Social Capital for Forest
Resource Management and the Improved
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
129
Volume 22, 2023
Livelihoods of Indigenous People in
Bangladesh. Journal of Rural and Community
Development, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010, pp. 105
122.
[11] Sheppard, S. R. J., Participatory decision
support for sustainable forest management: a
framework for planning with local
communities at the landscape level in Canada,
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 35,
No. 7, 2005, pp. 15151526.
[12] Hermawan, S, Rizal, M, Haryumeinanda, F,
Oktiviasti, Y. H. C., Constitutionality of
Indigenous Law Communities in the
Perspective of Sociological Jurisprudence
Theory. Jurnal Jurisprudence UMS, Vol. 11,
No. 2, 2021, pp. 282-296.
[13] Wardiono, K., Dimyati, K., Nugroho, S. S.,
Nugroho, H., Acob, J. R., Budiono, A.,
Philosophy, law, and ethics of handling
COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, Open
Access Macedonian Journal of Medical
Sciences. Vol. 9, No. E, 2021, pp. 1104-1108.
[14] Thomas, P. A., (Ed.), Socio-Legal Studies,
Sydney: Dartmouth, 1997.
[15] Janesick, V. J., The Dance of Qualitative
Research Design, Metaphor, Mythopoetry and
Meaning, In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincold
(Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (p.
212), California: Sage Publication, Inc., 1994.
[16] Nasution, S., Metode Penelitian Naturalistik
Kualitatif (Qualitative Naturalistic Research
Method), Bandung: Tarsito, 1996.
[17] Badan Pusat Statistik dan Badan Perencanaan
Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Ngawi,
Kabupaten Ngawi dalam Angka (Ngawi
Regency in Figures), Ngawi: BPS-Statistics
Indonesia, 2015.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
Badollahi: Conceived the research and provided an
original idea for the study.
Ruslan: provided materials and data for the research.
Budiono: carried out field research and collected
secondary legal materials.
Assaad: designed the methods and selected research
data.
Nugroho: interpreted the data and wrote the paper.
Nurkhaerah: analyzed the data and provided a
description.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
This research was funded by the research grant
funding of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta,
Indonesia.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2023.22.13
Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, Murniati Ruslan, Arief Budiono,
Andi Sukmawati Assaad, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, Siti Nurkhaerah
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
130
Volume 22, 2023
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.