Risk Hazard of Banking in Emerging Countries
WISNU MAWARDI1, MAHFUDZ1, RIO DHANI LAKSANA2, INTAN SHAFERI2
1Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University,
Semarang,
INDONESIA
2Faculty of Economics and Business, Jenderal Soedirman University,
Banyumas,
INDONESIA
Abstract: - The development of Islamic banking has been examined. Many researchers have been dedicated to
researching how this growth generates microeconomic consequences on financial institution efficiency. This paper
embodies a comprehensive analysis of Basel II standard implementation impacts gap in hazards between Islamic
and conventional banks in Asia countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Philippines, Brunei
Darussalam). Basel II requirements make contributions to expand the distance in hazard between conventional
banks and Islamic Banks at the rate of the latter. Four arguments may be supplied to provide an explanation for
why Basel II requirements can contribute to making Islamic banks exceptionally riskier than conventional banks.
the connection between Islamic banking and hazard is conditional on the regulatory framework. A mapping
descriptive examination analyzing the international locations of every form of bank and the 12 months of
implementation of Basel II regulation. This method was utilized in the Basel II implementation in a few of the Asia
nations of our pattern for the duration of the length of examination from 2015 to 2020. The treatment group
consists of banks in nations with an implementation of Basel II for the precise year with a substantial 10%; those
findings also are located whilst one by one thinking about small banks and massive banks, therefore, assisting the
view that the connection between Islamic Banking And Hazard is conditional to the regulatory framework.
Keywords: Risk, Hazard, Banking, ASEAN Countries, Islamic Banking, Conventional Banking
Received: April 17, 2022. Revised: November 25, 2022. Accepted: December 19, 2022. Published: December 31, 2022.
1 Introduction
The consequences of Islamic judgments are not
important in terms of the assessment of positive
coefficients and large in terms of prior bad luck
regulation. Therefore, we generally no longer see the
distinction in threat between Islamic banks and
industrial banks as an entire Asian nation. In this
examination, we discover the utility of the Basel II
version that could have an impact on the threat of
Islamic banks in comparison to industrial banks. The
improvement of Islamic finance increases problems
concerning its impact on financial solidity. The
concept of money in Islam and the limits of sharia
rules that are the reference in Islamic banking have
become one of the fastest-growing parts of the
monetary industry, which has spread over 300
organizations in 75 countries. Various business
analysts are of the view that monetary laws and
general laws have proven to be capable of being used
to monitor financial developments. However, the
impact of the Islamic economic concept on monetary
developments does not seem to be able to be
examined in depth because the information is still
limited. In Islamic banking, the concepts of risk-
sharing, dependence, and progress are used as a
reference for driving development while liquidity
capacity is limited so that it has the potential to harm
the economy. In this regard, Islamic banking is likely
to be able to influence monetary developments, the
impact of which is worth studying, [2].
The feature of banks is imperative for any
economic system (whether secular or Islamic) due to
the subsequent 4 reasons, [9], i) intermediation
offerings, ii) advent of an extensive sort of assets and
liabilities, iii) providing monetary services, and iv)
introduction of incentives. The maximum stated
intent for offering an opportunity banking machine
(Islamic banks) is the involvement of interest as a
means of performing the above-cited roles with the
resources of conventional banks. In line with Islamic
policies (Shariah), the prohibition of hobbies is
justified for 2 motives, [9]. First, any settlement
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
372
Volume 21, 2022
primarily based on hobby does not have a percentage
risk among activities. rather than acquire hazard from
all concerned events, the load unfairly accrues to a
single celebration. This unjust workout has a
detrimental effect on incumbent parties. Second, the
utility of hobbies in a monetary system has been
tested to be inefficient in resource allocation.
Because of the reality that banks choose to lend cash
only to the maximum worthwhile projects to ensure
returns on their investments, investors with low
creditworthiness live undervalued. This creates a
deviation between excessive income and coffee
income agencies in that society.
In recent times, several Islamic banks have
attempted to meet this financial need by providing
services and goods that are compliant with Sharia
law. These items are built with the paradigm of no
individual taking advantage of the misfortune of
others, in this way prohibiting Riba (interest). The
specialty of the return of the resource must lie in
one's assumption of the risk implied in making such a
return. Indeed, today Riba is seen as a more western
sin for Muslims than eating pork, drinking liquor, or
even being an infidel (as the blessed hadith of Islam,
Sunan ibn Majah shows). In conventional banking,
investors transfer risk to the bank by sharing their
resources to obtain the promised return, not caring
what benefit the bank can derive from those
resources. Borrowers who use conventional banks
have real risks because they must maintain the ability
to repay the loan principal as well as interest
independently according to their obligations.
Meanwhile, Islamic banks have different treatment
according to the type of client, namely investors and
borrowers. Investors or financial backers share risks
and returns with Islamic banks. The advantage of a
note is that it is subordinated to execution, not
guaranteed, and it is often paid through a Grant, the
return of which is not guaranteed. Islamic money
underlines risk-sharing through a resource-based
model, distinguishing ordinary money which is
generally liability based, from working with risk
exchange, [13].
The query we talk about in this examination is
whether the Basel II preferred has an impact on the
threat factors of Islamic banks. The Basel
recommendations had been installed through the
Basel Committee for Banking Supervision to
promote financial power. Irrespective of whether this
supervisory board has no sturdy impact on it, the
requirements it distributes have been followed
through many nations around the arena and are
visible as a benchmark for banking pointers. The
Basel II preferred was set up ino1988otoxoffer a
minimum capital requirement for banks. The Basel II
administrative device was added in 2004 to renew
Basel I and started to be carried out in 2006. Basel II
contains the idea of "three pillars'' in which the
primary pillar discusses the minimum capital
necessities. Banks should have a fundamental degree
of funding to cowl credit threats, book exchange
threats, and useful threats. numerous strategies for
estimation are proposed to weigh the risks. In the
Basel II structure, capital requirements are based on
risk; Risk is weighed for each resource to obtain
capital that matches the bank's original risk profile.
The second pillar of Basel II focuses on prudential
oversight and is aimed at supporting the powers of
specialist administration. The third pillar identifies
with market discipline. Disclosure of important data
about a bank's monetary profile is mandatory to
ensure transparency so that market discipline can
work optimally.
The Basel II suggestions lessen the greater
threat-taking for conventional banks over Islamic
banks because of the distinctive profiles of
participants. especially, Islamic bank investors have
extra essential motivational energy to screen bank
executions than ordinary bank participants due to the
perception of income and loss-sharing agreements.
As a result, the subject of Islamic bank investors is
higher than that of ordinary banks. Consequently,
without strict capital necessities, the threat for
Islamic banks should be decreased as those monetary
establishments are more involved in coping with
threats nicely.
The Basel II pointers lessen the danger of
conventional banks greater than Islamic banks due to
the exceptional tiers of cost held by each sort of
bank. Islamic banks absolutely have the riding
pressure to preserve a considerably extra price stage
than ordinary banks because of their capability
liquidity issues. Those banks do not have identical
admission to the interbank marketplace in maximum
nations and can't depend on subsidiaries and assisting
equipment. consequently, it is clever that they hold
the short-term liability decrease and extra depending
on cost. Additionally, they have an extra cost in
saving with a proportion of their income to cope with
liquidity pressures.
The Basel II pointers for marketplace area can in
addition enhance information for ordinary banks
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
373
Volume 21, 2022
more than Islamic banks, in that ability, can inspire
market subjects, especially for conventional banks,
due to the vulnerability in Islamic cash. This
predicament means that it's far required in an
exchange and, all matters are taken into
consideration, one celebration cannot deliberately
store information to have a distinguished command
over the exchange.
Fourth, Basel II capital necessities can grow the
threat of Islamic banks in comparison to ordinary
banks in phrases of threat-weighting strategies.
Capital necessities are weighted to be calculated to
lessen threat-taking for banks, however, in keeping
with them, the method in Basel II is ordinary. The
Basel II system of ensuring risk-weighted resources
does not take into account the risks associated with
the particular highlights of Islamic finance exercises.
The use of the inward assessment model proposed by
Basel II can overcome this problem, but it is rarely
implemented because of the cost and difficulty of its
use, for example, [9].
Basel II describes an extensive framework for
regulatory and operational practice. For instance,
Basel II covers and encourages the measurement of
risk for individual banks, emphasizing, and indeed
rewarding, internal methodologies for decision-
making in the banks. Basel II also sets out guiding
principles for the supervisory review and regulatory
functions, as well as setting out requirements
concerning disclosures to the market.
2 The Hypothesis Development
The primary assumption in this examination is that
the Basel II preferred provides to the threat gap
between conventional banks and Islamic banks to the
detriment of the ultimate alternative; Basel II will
then growth the threat of increasing Islamic banks
with ordinary banks arguments may be given to make
clear why the Basel II pointers may additionally
upload to creating Islamic banks commonly riskier
than regular banks.
The subsequent assumption is that the Basel II
guidelines are capable of influencing the risk gap
between conventional banks and Islamic banks
however are averse to standard banks. Ultimately,
those hints are probably more favorable to Islamic
banking, counting on the hypothesis that Islamic
economic institution members will educate their
economic stance not as lousy as ordinary bank
investors for strict intentions, for example, [1].
Specifically, strict contributor dependence will
permit Islamic banks to stand more traumatic
situations as they may be much less interested in
taking flight of their cash.
The third hypothesis is that the Basel II precept
has no effect on the danger gap between conventional
banks and Islamic banks. The underlying premise is
that these recommendations influence Islamic banks
and ordinary banks in lots the identical way. The
debate is that the present-day movements of Islamic
banks aren't sufficiently special from the ones of
everyday banks to anticipate the opportunity
outcomes of the Basel II recommendations. One
critical device through which the Basel II hints can
impact banks is by influencing their resource blend.
This element can then exert an alternative impact on
Islamic and conventional banks assuming the two
types of banks have remarkably one-of-a-kind mixes
of sources if Islamic banks hold a maximum of the
profit and loss sharing agreements. All matters being
the same, training indicates that Islamic banks hold a
constrained component of these agreements of their
accounting reports, e.g. [5], [6]. The moves of
Islamic banks offer a restricting contention
concerning the effect of Basel II standards on their
risk as compared to regular banks. It is consequently
essential to offer an observational examination to
feature this discussion.
3 Data And Methodology
This looks to utilize conventional and Islamic banks
in 10 nations within the ASEAN area. Bank grouping
between Islamic banks and conventional banks
depends on Bankscope. According to Cihak's
example, [4], we cannot recollect Islamic home
windows when they're the Islamic part of
conventional banks in our correlation. The point of
interest of our examination is to discover the
functioning of the Basel II norms concerning the
connection between Islamic banking and risk.
Our right method relies upon the use of
variations in distinct methods to deal with the effect
of the breakdown of Basel II norms on the
connection between Islamic Banking And Risk. We
carried out this technique due to the fact we were
capable of taking gain of variations inside the
implementation of Basel II among our 10 sample
international locations at some point of the look at
the period from 2016 to 2020. Four international
locations Handelman the Basel II guidelines in 2007,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
374
Volume 21, 2022
2 nations had the Basel II pointers carried out in
2007, and 2008 and three nations had Basel II
suggestions carried out at the end of 2015.
This table offers information for the nations used
in the instance within the range of every kind of bank
and the timing of implementation of the Basel II
hints.
Table 1. Overview Banks
COUNTRIES
ISLAMIC
BANK
CONVENTIONAL
BANK
Indonesia
10
69
Malaysia
17
34
Singapore
6
20
Brunei
1
1
Philipina
2
55
Cambodia
0
6
Laos
0
10
Myanmar
1
31
Thailand
1
23
Vietnam
0
48
We First Measure debt threat with the z-rating
(Z-score), that's regularly used in clinical research
as an intermediary for financial institution
dependence together, [3]. The Z-score is the main
hazard degree utilized by e.g., iháok [4] in their
assessment of the soundness of Islamic banking
and finance and is taken into consideration with
different risks of their work linking Islamic
banking and risk. Z-score is calculated by using the
subsequent method:
Z−score i,t = [ROAi +
CARi]t/[SD(ROAi)]
where ROA is the estimated profit from the
resource with the proportion of net profit to add the
resource, CAR is the proportion of the value of
cash flows to the resource, SD (ROA) is the same
old deviation of ROA, and t is the yr. SD (ROA) is
the same old deviationoofoROAoforotheo duration
we don't forget 2016 to 2020 and refers to the
uncertainty of returns. The z-rating is contrary to
the possibility of bank financial ruin; therefore,
better z-rankings are associated with greater crucial
electricity. Using the Z-score lets us keep in mind
distinctive kinds of banks because it concludes an
equitable and goal evaluation of bank adequacy.
Then we used three estimates recognized with
credit threat. Following the previous study
instance, [1], the percentage of loss in advance
deposits to net advances is our primary marker of
credit score risk, revealing bank directors'
assessment of the down payment portfolio. The
proportion of bad debt deposits to net advances
considers the assumptions for the future
implementation of the allowable advances. A more
significant store level recommends a more
important financial risk, representing an expected
low period in the future. Moreover, we use two
elective credit risk indicators which, as
demonstrated by for example [1], both inversely
seek intermediaries for credit risk: the proportion
of upfront gap-setting to net down payments (loan
deficit management) and the proportion of
weakening advances. into net advances (Decrease
in value of advances). The upfront gap putting
refers to the expenses that banks ought to pay while
re-surveying loss deposits earlier or discounting
advances. The weakening credit proportion extends
when banks classify advances as non-performing.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
375
Volume 21, 2022
Each of the three clues to credit risk considers the
nature of bank advances. Therefore, the higher
each proportion, the less secure the bank's credit.
We also use a dummy sharia variable with a
value of one for the assumption of an Islamic bank
and zero for the assumption of a non-Islamic bank.
Additionally, it is a Basel II dummy variable, that's
the same as assuming the United States has applied
Basel II suggestions for the eligible year and zero
anyways. facts on the life of Basel II norms are
accumulated from world financial institution-
directed “bank law and Supervision” evaluations,
BIS Financial Stability Institutions (FSI) reviews
and national bank websites for sample countries.
The illustrative variable that becomes a crucial
situation is the period relationship between Islam
and Basel II offers records on the separate impact
of the implementation of the Basel II suggestions
on Islamic Banks and industrial banks. assuming
the Islamic × Basel IIocoefficientois high quality
(bad) for the z-score (credit score danger thing),
this implies that the Basel II norm adds a greater
said discount of bank threat for Islamic banks than
for everyday banks. standard, those pointers will be
extra beneficial for Islamic banks. Apparently, the
alternative sign for the Islamic×Basel II coefficient
might help the view that Basel II concepts widen
the pitfall among conventional and Islamic banks
to the detriment of the latter option.
We integrate management elements to bear in
mind bank and nations attributes. We recall three
financial institution-stage management factors. size
is expected through the logarithm of all sources due
to the fact task length may have an impact on bank
chance. Advances to properly estimate the
development of exercise, in keeping with the view
that credit development influence’s chance, [7].
cost to profits is envisioned by using the percentage
of charges to money. As talked about for example
[3], a failure of the fee creates a risk.
We recollect four a-stage management factors.
Gross home product growth allows us to
manipulate the macroeconomic cycle, which is
taken from other world development signs. The
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index estimates financial
institution fixation and is processed with records
from Bank scope. various studies have centered
that financial institution contests can boost
financial institution chance e.g. [8], [11], [12].
Regulation and order indicate the character of the
establishment and display the effect of the volume
to which individuals believe in the requirements of
their country. oInstitutionaloqualityocanohave an
impact on a financial institution's risk-taking
conduct, [3], and is derived from the world bank's
international Governance indicators. expansion is
the once-a-year price trade from the customer fee
report and is acquired from the world development
indicators.
Insights dropping the light on financial
institution-specific elements are presented at desk
2. We took a look at the approach between the 2
sorts of banks. In this situation, we use the
Wilcoxon check primarily based on the fact that the
factors are typically no longer adjusted.
examination of centers for Islamic banks and
regular banks in preference will display more
serious dangers for Islamic banks they have got a
lower z-rating, like better debt hazard, and give a
higher everyday prematurely gap risk and in
advance gap placing proportion, exposing higher
credit score danger. The primary credit score
danger indicator offering an opportunity standpoint
is the weaker down payment percentage, which is
lower for Islamic banks.
Table 2 advises on the elements of the financial
institution degree tested. The Wilcoxon test
estimates the implied pattern that means for non-
parametric elements recognized after trying out for
normality of the dispersion because of the Shapiro-
Wilk Test. o***, **, and * imply importance at
1%, five%, ando10%, separately.
Table 2. The Wilcoxon test measures
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
376
Volume 21, 2022
Islamic
Banks
Conventional
Bank
N
Mean
SD
N
Mean
SD
Wilcoxon test
Z Score
190
32.421
41.478
1485
38.432
31,324
7.163***
Loan Loss
reserves
180
7.320
15.21
1321
6.123
9.564
1.872***
Loan Loss
Provisions
178
1.621
3.893
1425
1.212
2.132
3.102***
Impaired Loans
178
7.125
12.086
1425
8.396
13.974
1.426
Size
190
14.132
1.514
1485
13.721
1.754
3.805***
Loans to Assets
190
45.246
22.786
1485
49.201
19.221
1.231
Cost to income
190
60.124
34.943
1485
48.053
27.021
2.845***
We can then use the comparison difference
approach, which lets in control for changing financial
situations or another element that applies to all banks,
i.e., the benchmark group. Our care organization
consists of banks in international locations with Basel
II implementation for a given 12 months. Our
benchmark group remembers banks for international
locations Basel II implementation for a given 12
months.
With this exploratory plan, we will definitively
distinguish what Basel II approaches for hazards in
Islamic finance as opposed to conventional banking.
The observed courting betweenoBaseloII execution
and financial institution hazard may be driven by
occasions going on at some point of these hours of
software and could then be able to result in unilateral
ends. The comparison-difference technique allowed
us to remedy this trouble because we analyzed the
differences between the remedy group and the
benchmark organization in their improvement in
advance, then after the implementation of Basel II.
Vital trouble with the use of the evaluation-difference
approach is the similarity among examination
encounters. We comply with this precondition by the
usage of our United States of America instance of
developing international locations
fromotheomiddleoEastoand Asia. All nations are
comparable in some basic aspect, including
institutional quality or being a developing nation.
We conducted repeated tests on the impact of
irregularities to analyze the effect of implementing
Basel II on the bank's risk profile. This detail is
raised using board information and the way the
illustrative variables of Islam are consistent over the
long term.
The tests carried out are formulated in the following
formula:
Risky Bank,j,t = 0 + 1 Islamic,t + 2Basel II, t + 3
Islamic ×Basel II Size Loans to resources i,j,t
4 i,t 5 i,t + 6 Cost to income,t + 7 GDP growth,t + 8
HHIj,t Inflation Rule of Law 9 j,t 10 j,ti,j,t
(2)
Principle assessment. Board assessments with
irregular impact. The established variable is a risk
indicator, the best factor of the phase. The T-test
appears in brackets below the coefficients being
assessed. *, **, *** means that the measurer is not
essentially equal to 0 at the 10%, 5,% or 1% level.
We use the recognized big 10%.
Table 3. Main Estimation
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
377
Volume 21, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Islamic
Bank
-0.625
20.30
2.239
2.955
0.459*
0.242
0.374
0.337
(-0.18)
-3.23
-2.05
(−2.60)
-3.38
-0.52
-0.38
-0.25
Basel II
2.101
6.29
2.954***
0.898*
0.042
0.255
3.323***
3.275***
(0.84)
-2.53
-5.07
-3.09
(−0.30)
(−2.02)
-4.35
-3.93
Islamic x
Basel II
-
-26.28
_ 4.709***
_
0.483
_
0.278
(-3.28)
-5.53
-2.6
-0.24
Size
1.42
2.032
2.956
***
2.962**
*
0.059
0.052
2.993
***
2.990
***
(1.63)
-0.23
(−8.37)
(−8.42)
(−2.22)
(−0.96)
(−6.64)
(−6.64)
Loans to
Assets
0.0047
0.0063
0.273
***
0.273**
*
0.035**
*
0.035**
*
0.298
***
0.298
***
(0.10)
-0.24
(−23.4
6)
(−23.49)
(−6.66)
(−6.74)
(−20.8
4)
(−20.8
6)
Cost to
Income
0.0277
0.03
0.033***
0.030***
0.006**
0.007**
0.026
0.026
(0.64)
0.303
-4.53
-4.33
(−3.77)
(−3.86)
-2.5
-2.5
GDP
Growth
0.321
-2.42
0.0033
0.004
0.056**
*
0.056**
*
0.036
0.036
(1.24)
0.343
-0.07
-0.23
(−4.64)
(−4.62)
(−0.90)
(−0.90)
Rule of
Law
-0.485
-0.33
0.538
0.404
0.023
0.006
0.589
0.587
(-0.44)
0.27
9
-2.64
-2.35
-0.28
(−0.09)
-2.34
-2.33
Inflation
-0.113
(−0.9
9)
0.035
0.034
0.050***
0.052***
0.225**
0.225**
(-0.54)
33.5
5
-0.94
-2.35
-4.87
-4.97
-3.26
-3.26
HHI
-18.359
(−2.7
8)
8.953
***
9.509**
*
2.390
2.374
23.66
***
23.65
***
(-1.34)
28.83
(−3.38)
(−3.62)
(−2.65)
(−2.63)
(−3.73)
(−3.72)
Intercept
18.173
-2.67
38.980**
*
40.520***
3.682***
3.753***
43.730**
*
43.740**
*
(1.14)
-22.34
-22.79
-4.66
-4.76
-9.63
-9.63
R2
0.010
0.026
0.146
0.172
0.07
0.066
0.248
0.274
N of
Banks
335
335
325
325
314
314
308
308
N of Obs
1675
1675
1625
1625
1570
1570
1540
1540
Board assessments with irregular impacts. The reliant
variable is the danger pointer at the highest point of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
378
Volume 21, 2022
the segment. t-insights show up in enclosures beneath
assessed coefficients. *, **, *** means a gauge
fundamentally unique in relation to 0 at the 10%, 5%
or 1% level. We utilize 10% critical that is
acknowledged.
Table 4. Estimations by Size
Z-score
Loan loss
reserves
1
2
3
4
5
6
Islamic
4.36
4.341
9.130*
3.073*
3.498**
1.444
-1.08
-1.11
-1.37
(−1.34)
(−1.48)
(−1.35)
Basel II
4.293*
4.414*
7.594**
1.993***
1.340**
1.504***
-2.2
-2.14
-3.48
-4.73
-3.05
-3.41
Islamic×Basel II
14.81**
14.84**
14.30***
4.499***
5.150***
4.304***
(−3.19)
(−3.18)
(−3.49)
-5.38
-4.01
-4.94
Size
0.912
0.795
1.138
1.145**
*
1.187***
1.844
***
-1.21
-1.05
-1.8
(−9.14)
(−9.23)
(−8.44)
Loans to assets
0.042
0.038
0.0147
0.174**
*
0.144***
0.181
***
-0.71
-0.44
-0.47
(−13.18)
(−12.51)
(−14.08
)
Cost to income
0.023
0.018
0.0391
0.011**
0.019***
0.011**
-0.45
-0.51
-1.4
-1.93
-4.12
-3.01
GDP growth
0.228
0.0137
-0.99
-0.44
Rule of law
3.963
0.612
-1.16
-1.24
Inflation
0.117
0.028
(−0.60)
-1.01
HHI
29.950
11.110***
(−3.95)
(−1.45)
Intercept
13.32
14
12.82
49.66***
50.55***
40.40***
-0.96
-0.79
-1.22
-10.35
-10.04
-12.31
Country
dummies
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
0.1369
0.1384
0.0253
0.324
0.3194
0.1769
N of banks
335
314
335
325
314
325
N of obs.
1675
1570
1675
1625
1570
1625
4 Discussion Our result is that the separate impact of the Basel II
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
379
Volume 21, 2022
norm on financial institution chance for Islamic and
conventional banks isn't always affected by financial
institution size. While thinking about the hazard of
bankruptcy, the term Islamic×Basel II relationship is
bad for all account managers with the complete
example being largely bad, approximately the Z-
rating for small banks and huge banks. While
considering credit score chance, the term Islamic
Basel II cooperation which is basically sure for all
cash deposits with a complete instance is essentially
sure with loss savings loans for small banks and
massive banks. The time cooperation isn't always
very large while the usage of down payment.
Disrupted due to the fact the credit score risk markers
for all banks are still no longer very important when
we consider small and large banks independently.
The primary exception is when thinking about
loan loss preparations as a hallmark of credit threat.
The cooperation period isn't always large when all
the banks are introduced together. Now, we see that
the period of collaboration is very critical and
advantageous at the ten% degree for small banks but
not massive for massive banks. Consequently, we see
only a few of the identified contrasts with financial
institution length with the share of credit score
default arrangements as in the Basel II
recommendations as expanding the hazard for
Islamicobanksomoreothanoconventional banks - but
handiest for small banks.
The realization of the size-primarily based
assessment is that, in popular, Basel II norms do not
affect small and massive bank risk unpredictably.
Our essential remark that they make Islamic banks
riskier than conventional banks is impartial of bank
size.
Our essential results had been shown by using
numerous signs that estimate financial institution
hazards and by way of assessments by way of group
size. further, we clearly see our effects by means of
testing the impact of country factors in our
assessment. country element settings may
additionally influence effects in distinctive ways, for
example, except for factors or connections with the
market share of Islamic banks inside the country.
We did three new tests. First, it consists of a
rustic dummy variable to control for USA evaluation
and leave out the 4 United states level control factors
(GDP improvement, Rule of regulation, Inflation,
IHL). We are then ready to check the impact of
strong go-country evaluation on our consequences.
2d, we at the same time don't forget the state forger
thing and the 4 nation-level management factors. 1/3,
we keep away from all countrywide factors. The
effects are defined in Tables three and 4. We revisit
the time Islamic×Basel II dating due to the fact we
are interested in the signal and the means of these
coefficients.
Each judgment confirms us beyond results. For
the three new determinations of the United States of
America factors, we see that the tenure is largely
poor with the Z-score, basically fixed with negative
loans, and unimportant with disrupted mortgage and
credit score agreements. Moreover, our essential
remark that the Basel II widespread makes Islamic
banks riskier than regular banks isn't always
encouraged through country regulatory factors.
5 Conclusion
We inspect how the adoption of Basel II
requirements can also influence the threat of Islamic
banks so relative to conventional banks. The
enlargement of Islamic banking increases questions
about its effect on monetary balance. We further
intricate the work on the relationship between Islamic
banking and hazard by means of analyzing the effect
of Basel II rules on threat for each Islamic and
conventional bank.
We discover that the Basel II preferred has a
distinctive effect on the threat of Islamic banks and
conventional banks. We used an importance level of
10%. They contribute to decreasing the bankruptcy
risk of conventional banks but a boom for Islamic
banks. The growth credit score threat is measured
through the loan loss reserve ratio for each kind of
bank however greater so for Islamic banks.
Therefore, we support the view that the Basel II
policies expand the threat gap between conventional
and Islamic banks at the expense of Islamic banks.
This end stands for small banks and large banks.
This study uses variables that have been
considered previously from the theory and previous
studies. Future research can consider Basel II with
the use of more variables so that it can enrich the
research.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
380
Volume 21, 2022
[1] Baele, F., Farooq, M., & Ongena, S. (2014). Of
Religion and Redemption: Evidence from
Default on Islamic Loans. J. Bank. Finance,
44(7), 141-159.
[2] Čihák, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic Banks
and Financial Stability: An Empirical Analysis.
J. Financ. Serv. Res(38), 95-113.
[3] Abedifar, P., Molyneux, P., & Tarazi, A.
(2013). Risk in Islamic Banking. Rev. Finance,
17, 2035-2096.
[4] Berger, A., Klapper, L., & Turk-Ariss, R.
(2010). Bank Competition and Financial
Stability. J. Financ. Serv. Res, 38, 96-113.
[5] Chong, B. S., & Liu, M. H. (2009). Islamic
Banking: Interest-Free or Interest-Based?
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(1), 125-144.
[6] El-Hawary, D., Grais, W., & Iqbal, Z. (2010).
Diversity in The Regulation of Islamic
Financial Institutions. The Quarterly Review of
Economic and Finance, 46(5), 778-800.
[7] Foos , D., Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2010).
Loan Growth and Riskiness of Banks. J.
Banks. Finance, 34(12), 2929-2940.
[8] Fungacova, Z., & Weill, L. (2013). Does
Competition Influence Bank Failures? Econ.
Transit, 21(2), 100-112.
[9] Iqbal, M., & Molyneux, P. (2005). Efficiency in
Islamic Banking: In Thirty years of Islamic
Banking. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
[10] Laksana, R. D., Hersugondo, H., Wahyudi, S.,
& Muharram, H. (2017). The New
Decomposition Asset Growth Effect. Empirical
Evidence of Indonesia. Journal of Applied
Economic Sciences, 12(4), 977-984.
[11] Mawardi, W., Mahfudz, M, L., & Shaferi.
(2020). Competition and Financial Effects
Between Islamic and Conventional Banking
WSEAS Transactions on Business and
Economics.
[12] Wanke, P., Hassan, M., & Gavião, L. (2017).
Islamic Banking and Performance in The
Asean Banking Industry: A Topsis Approach
with Probabilistics Weights. International
Journal of Business and Society, 18(1), 129-
150.
[13] Weill, L. (2011). Do Islamic Banks Have
Greater Market Power? Comp. Econ. Stud, 53,
679-693.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_
US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.41
Wisnu Mawardi, Mahfudz, Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
381
Volume 21, 2022
References: