Implementation of a Digitally Controlled MOS based Tuned
Reconfigurable Filter for High Frequency Applications
MD TANZIM AHMED1, MANASH PRATIM SARMA1, NIKOS E MASTORAKIS2,
Dept of ECE
1, Gauhati University ,Guwahati, INDIA
Faculty of Engineering
2, Technical University of Sofia, BULGARIA
Abstract- With the advent of recent standard of high data rate communication standards, the systems need to meet the
requirement of multi-frequency processing. Moreover to achieve backward and forward compatibility across communication
standards, reconfigurable and tunable designs are preferred. This paper proposes a fully digital reconfigurable all pass filter
(APF) with a tunable passband to meet such requirements. The reconfigurable APF is capable of band tuning using a digital
current control source (DCCS) which uses a digital word count making it most effective and simple reconfigurable design
than the already reported designs. This can be widely used in different systems, e.g., 5G receivers, radar communication,
cyber security, sensor interfaces, etc. This APF is also connected to Schmitt trigger inverter for smooth communication.
Moreover, the circuit is designed to be inductor less thus making the design area efficient and suitable for wide range of
applications and systems. The proposed design is simulated using 65 nm GPDK CMOS technology that achieves a wideband
range of 0.1-15 GHz and achieves a bandwidth of 12.6 GHz with a gain of 15.5dB with a time delay of 1.62ps. The static
power consumption of the circuit is only 2.52mW.
Keywords: DCCS, CMOS, 65-nm technology, flip flop.
1. Introduction
In today’s world, technology plays a very important role,
especially in communication sector. Filters using CMOS
technologies are the most preferred filter circuits in
today’s advance world as the variability and
reconfigurability can be easily adjusted in a CMOS filter
which is most preferable aspect in any filter circuit and
more importantly they can be further modified in terms of
noise reduction, bandwidth increment, etc.
Filters with reconfigurable nature and true time delay
cells are being widely used and implemented. This filters
have achieved high capability of tuning with true delay
cells[1-3]. Nowadays filters are also available with
intrinsic switching that exhibits a quasi-elliptic-type
transfer function which can be tuned in for both frequency
and bandwidth (BW) and can be intrinsically switched-off
and on and thus achieving the reconfigurability of the
filter circuit [4]. Active RC filters have also emerged as a
growing field in filter circuits which filters out the most
unwanted signals, as they separate and allow to pass only
those sinusoidal input signals based upon their frequency
and required bandwidth [5]. Recent studies shows
adaptive bandpass filters are used in grid synchronization
widely as it provides a means to adjust the various
parameters attached to it according to an optimization
algorithm, which is very effective and fruitful
[6].Defected ground structures are also recently used in
order to design filter circuits as they help in enhancing the
bandwidth and gain of microstrip antenna and also helps
in suppressing mutual coupling between elements [8]
and also various applications are being proposed of filters
using lumped components as it maintains a minimal
change in phase of a waveform between the input and
output connections whenever it is in operating mode. [9].
The digital current control source (DCCS) is an
integral part of digital control oscillators which forms the
basic reconfigurable part of any filter circuit. It helps in
tuning of the circuit in wide range along with required
reconfiguration and efficiency [20, 21].
In this paper, a first order voltage mode
inductor less all pass filter is being proposed. The
proposed filter circuit consists of 3 parts, firstly an
inductor less all pass filter circuit is designed then the
proposed filter circuit is reconfigured using a digital
current control source (DCCS) which is then connected to
a parallel source of Schmitt trigger inverter. The proposed
filter circuit achieves a wideband range of 0.1-15 GHz
and achieves a bandwidth of 12.6 GHz with a gain of
15.5dB having a time delay of 1.62ps. The circuit
consumes only 2.52mW from 2-V supply. This paper is
Received: March 26, 2022. Revised: November 17, 2022. Accepted: December 16, 2022. Published: December 31, 2022.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
330
Volume 21, 2022
organized as follows: Section II describes the design of
the reconfigurable filter. Section III consists of simulation
and results. Conclusion is drawn in Section IV.
2. The Design of the Reconfigurable
Filter
The design of the entire system starts with the system
block diagram as shown in figure 1. Here the block
diagram is basically divided into 3 parts: digitally
controlled current source (DCCS), Schmitt trigger
inverter and all pass filter.
Fig.1. Block diagram of the system
The input signal is taken into the DCCS which does the
main work of reconfiguring the filter by taking input from
various word counts after which the output is sent to
Schmitt trigger inverter for reducing the noise in the
circuit before passing it to the all pass filter. The signal
after passing through the all pass filter gives an output of
high bandwidth and free from noise. We get a desirable
range of frequency from the stated all pass filter.
2.1 Inductor less design of the All Pass Filter
The first stage of the design is the block diagram of
inductor less all pass filter as shown in figure 2.
Fig.2. Block diagram of inductor less all pass filter
Here the block diagram consists of two transistors M1 and
M2, resistor RL and capacitor C1.Here, 2 parts are formed,
the low pass part and unity gain part. The low pass part is
the combination of resistor RL, transistor M1 and
capacitor C1 while resistor RL, capacitor C1 and transistor
M2 together forms the unity gain part. The schematic
inductor less all pass filter circuit is shown in figure 3.
Fig.3. Inductor less first order voltage mode all pass filter.
If transistor parasitics is ignored, the transfer function of
the all pass filter circuit is given by:

 󰇛󰇜 
 
󰇝 󰇛 󰇜󰇞

  

󰇛󰇜
 (1)
The transconductances of M1 and M2 are given as 
and  respectively. Taking,  
and .
Pole/zero frequency of the first order all pass filter is
given by:
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
331
Volume 21, 2022

 (2)
Phase response of the first order all pass filter is given by:
󰇛󰇜 

 (4)
Group delay response is given by:
󰇛󰇜 
󰇛󰇜 (5)
Here, ω is the angular frequency given by frequency f,
where ω = f.
Here, after designing the required inductor less all pass
filter, there is a need to make the circuit digitally
reconfigurable in nature. So that it can adjust to
variable frequency ranges and attains the required
bandwidth automatically.
2.2 Reconfigurable & Tunable design of
Digital APF
To make the APF digitally reconfigurable in nature, the
APF is connected to a Digitally Controlled Current
Source (DCCS) which enables the APF to adjust its
frequency range automatically. Figure 4 represents the
block diagram of the APF connected to a DCCS.
Fig.4.
Block diagram of digitally reconfigurable inductor less all
pass filter
The transfer function of the digitally reconfigured
inductor less all pass filter is given by:

 󰇛󰇜 
  
=󰇝󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇞
 󰇛󰇜
The used digitally controlled current source is depicted in
figure 5. In order to illustrate reconfigurability and tuning
process, 4 current branches are selected. Transistors M00,
M01, M02 and M03 are connected in parallel and controlled
by switch transistors SW0, SW1, SW2 and SW3. The
switches are controlled by digital control word (D3, D2,
D1, D0) which is generated with the help of a 4 bit D flip
flop counter.
Fig.5.
Digital current control source
tunable all pass filter
If the value is 1, the switch is turn on and when the value
is 0 the switch is turned off and current cannot reach the
output terminal. The equivalent current source has high
linearity and precision. Ictrl is the sum of current
accounted by each branch I0, I1, I2 and I3 as shown in
figure 6.
Fig 6. Ictrl descriptive diagram

 (7)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
332
Volume 21, 2022

 󰇡
󰇢 (8)
After attaching the DCCS to the APF circuit the digital
control mechanism is guided by a 4 bit word count which
gives various input bits in order to provide the range of
frequency needed to reconfigure the filter.
2.3 Digital Control Mechanism
The 4 bit digital word count is achieved by using a D Flip
Flop counter. Each input of the counter acts as the input
of each switch as D0, D1, D2 and D3. The count generates
1 or 0 every time to make the current flow and stop
through each switches coming from the branches of I0, I1,
I2 and I3.The D Flip Flop counter is shown in figure 7.
Fig. 7. 4 bit D Flip Flop Counter
The Truth table of the counter generating the
reconfiguration of the filter is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Truth table
Word
Count
D0
D1
D2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
3
0
0
1
4
0
1
0
5
0
1
0
6
0
1
1
7
0
1
1
8
1
0
0
9
1
0
0
10
1
0
1
11
1
0
1
12
1
1
0
13
1
1
0
14
1
1
1
15
1
1
1
Here, after making the APF reconfigurable in nature, the
circuit is vulnerable to high noise as the DCCS
contributes to increase in noise level in the circuit and
disrupts the signal, leading to poor signal. Hence, there is
a need to reduce the noise in the circuit to make the signal
noise less.
2.4 Modified Design of Digital APF
In order to reduce the noise in the circuit, the proposed
reconfigurable APF filter circuit is connected to Schmitt
trigger inverter.
Figure 8 represents the block diagram
of the
reconfigurable APF filter connected to
Schmitt
inverter. The block diagram represents 3 parts, 1stly the
signal passes through DCCS which is digitally
reconfigured and passed onto Schmitt trigger inverter for
smoothening and noise removal, after which the final
signal passes to APF circuit and the final output is
obtained.
Fig.8.
Block diagram of digitally reconfigurable inductor less all
pass filter connected to Schmitt trigger inverter
Two Schmitt trigger inverters connected in
parallel are attached to the circuit to make the signal
smooth and reduce noise for transmission and
communication purpose as shown in figure 9.The Schmitt
trigger doesn’t alter any output only enhances the output
signal and reduce noise. The used Schmitt Trigger
Inverter is depicted in Fig 10.
Fig.9. Reconfigurable APF circuit with Schmitt trigger inverter
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
333
Volume 21, 2022
Fig.10.Schmitt trigger inverter
2.5 Complete Reconfigurable APF circuit
Finally all the circuits combined forms the reconfigurable
filter circuit as shown in figure 11. Here the circuit starts
by getting input signal through the digital current control
source which acts as the word count facilitator using the
help of D flip flop sending 0’s and 1’s. The word
reconfigures the range of frequency to be passed with
every signal passing. Once the required signal is
generated it is passed through a Schmitt trigger inverter to
reduce the noise, in order to get a hassle free signal. Once
it is achieved, the final signal is passed through the all
pass filter circuit in order to get the desired bandwidth and
frequency output as well various other parameters.
Fig 11. Complete Reconfigurable APF circuit
3. Simulation and Results
The reconfigurable inductor less all pass filter is
simulated in LtSpice using a 65nm CMOS process. The
reconfiguration is achieved using a D Flip Flop counter to
generate 4 bit word count in DCCS. As a result using
delay in every counter, 4 bits are generated as shown in
figure 12, 13, 14 and 15. D0 has no delay, D1 has a delay
of 2s, D2 has a delay of 6s and D3 has a delay of 10s to
generate binary outputs of 0’s and 1’s. These outputs
together contribute to a total of 16 bit and as a result
frequency and other parameters are plotted with it.
Fig. 12. D0 word count
Fig. 13. D1 word count
Fig 14. D2 word count
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
334
Volume 21, 2022
Fig 15. D3 word count
The circuit is operated at 2V which consumes a total
power of 2.52mW which is shown in figure 16.The total
power consumption of all the individual components is
shown in figure 8.The sharp rise in the plot is due to the
sudden switching on and off the switches in DCCS
accounting 0 and 1. As, the power consumption is pretty
less for rest of the circuit thus easily compensating the
sudden rise of power. Thus, the entire circuit consumes
very less amount of power to operate smoothly.
Fig16. Simulated power consumption response of the reconfigurable
voltage mode all pass filter.
2 different frequency range output has been plotted,
corresponding to Inductor less APF and reconfigurable
Inductor less APF.
Figure 17, represents output plot corresponding to simple
Inductor less APF ranging from 0.1GHz to 15GHz. The
Bandwidth of the circuit is 13.1 GHz with a gain of
15.42dB. The group delay is equal to approximately
1.2ps, having a range of 1.20ps to 1.08ps
Figure 18, displays frequency range of the reconfigured
inductor less all pass filter ranging from 0.1GHz to
15GHz. The Bandwidth of the circuit is 12.6 GHz with a
gain of 15.5dB. The group delay is equal to
approximately 1.62ps, having a range of 1.51ps to 1.77ps.
As visible, output of both simple APF and
reconfigurable APF is identical which indicates that the
digital reconfiguration is achieved without altering the
output and performance of the filter.
Fig.17. Simulated group delay and gain response of the
reconfigurable inductor less all pass filter.
Fig. 18. Simulated group delay and gain response of the simple
inductor less all pass filter.
Moreover, the circuit shows a smooth gain attainment
achieved due to linearity of the circuit and also delay is
very less which indicates no loss of information while
transmitting signal. Thus, the circuit operates at a very
low group delay, indicating the high efficiency of the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
335
Volume 21, 2022
circuit and also the circuit works at a varying range of
frequency and giving output of high gain and bandwidth.
Fig. 19. Simulated frequency response of the reconfigurable voltage
mode all pass filter on account of 4 bit word count
Figure 19, displays the frequency response of the
reconfigurable voltage mode all pass filter at a frequency
ranging from 0.1GHz to 15GHz with the input of word
count as shown in table 1. Word count of 4 bit generates a
total combination of 16 bit and hence the output. The
graph clearly displays slow rise of frequency range from
0.1Ghz to 15Ghz as per word count, this accounts to the
stability of the circuit and also the fast rise from 10Ghz to
15Ghz is due to word count 1111 which accounts to
switching on all the switches together in the circuit.
Since some bit generates the same value and range. Table
2 and 3, shows the values along with the frequency range
they are depicting.
Table 2. Word count representing same values
Sl no.
word count representing same values
1
0001
1000
0100
0010
2
0011
0101
0110
1010
1100
1001
3
0111
1011
1110
1101
Table 3. Frequency range corresponding each word count
Word Count
Frequency Range(approx.)
Experimental values (in Ghz)
0000
0.1-2
0001
2.1-6
0011
6.1-9
0111
9.1-12
1111
12.1-15
Figure 20, displays leakage current flowing through the
circuit due to the two CMOS transistors. Operating at 2V,
M1 transistor has a leakage current of -614.57nA and M2
transistor has a leakage current of 614.57nA, operating
within a voltage range of 20mV to 2V. The leakage
current also flows at a steady rate with little inclination
when the voltage increases. Thus, the low amount of
leakage current indicates that the circuit operates
smoothly at normal condition without any disturbances or
tripping.
Fig.20. Simulated leakage current response of the reconfigurable
voltage mode all pass filter.
2 different Noise plots are plotted where, in one case
Schmitt trigger inverter is used in the circuit and in other
case Schmitt trigger is not used.
Fig.21. Simulated circuit noise response of the reconfigurable
voltage mode all pass filter connected to Schmitt trigger inverter.
Figure 21, displays total noise in the circuit when the
circuit is connected with Schmitt trigger inverter. The
voltage noise density ranges from 32pV/Hz1/2 to
48pV/Hz1/2 and total circuit RMS noise is 6.65µV.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
336
Volume 21, 2022
Similarly, Figure 22 displays total noise in the circuit
when the circuit is not connected with Schmitt trigger
inverter. The voltage noise density ranges from from
44pV/Hz1/2 to 64pV/Hz1/2 and total circuit RMS noise is
21.77µV.Clearly, noise is more when not connected to
Schmitt trigger inverter and hence use of Schmitt trigger
inverter is useful to reduce noise and commence a smooth
communication. The abrupt inclination of the noise occurs
due to the capacitor present in the all pass filter. However,
noise in the circuit is found to very low, i.e. 6.65µV
which indicates the filter circuit will have very less error
and at the same time free from malfunctions.
Fig 22. Simulated circuit noise response of the reconfigurable
voltage mode all pass filter without Schmitt trigger inverter.
The performance summary and comparison with other active
filter circuits are presented in Table 4.Comparing all the results
the proposed reconfigured voltage mode all pass filter has made
significant improvement in frequency range, low maximum
delay value, high bandwidth, lower power consumption, high
gain and also lower noise value in the filter circuit.
4. Conclusion
A reconfigurable filter design with tunable passband has
been proposed in this paper. The proposed reconfigurable
filter works on the principle of digital current control
source (DCCS). In the previously reported works every
DCCS depends entirely on the digital control oscillator
(DCO) circuit to operate but in our design the DCCS
functions independently and efficiently. Moreover the
frequency ranges of previous designs are around 0.1 Ghz
to 3 Ghz using DCO which is improved to the range of
0.1Ghz to 15Ghz using DCCS. The D Flip Flop is acting
as the energy supplier by providing the word counts in the
form of 0’s and 1’s.The 16 bit range of word count is
providing the range for frequency to operate, which is
fully digital in nature and also free from any anomalies or
mismatch. The counters in the flip flop perfectly matches
the frequency ranges and provides smooth
reconfiguration. Thus reducing area in size of the project
and also no impact of negative feedback occurs in our
circuit. Moreover, Schmitt trigger is used here for the first
time in such circuit, which reduces the noise in the signal
thereby making it suitable for transmitting. Also the
circuit is designed to be inductor less hence it can be
claimed to be an area efficient one. The performance
comparison with recently reported works clearly shows
the efficacy of this filter.
The proposed first order voltage mode all pass filter has
achieved a group delay of approximately 1.62ps with a
bandwidth of 12.6 GHz. The static power consumption of
the circuit is only 2.52mW under a 2V supply. Also, the
range of operating frequency is 0.1-15 GHz and the
circuit has achieved a gain of 15.5dB with a minimum
noise factor of only 6.65µV. Moreover the leakage
current of the circuit is only, which justifies
the stability of the filter circuit.
References
[1] Wang, Z. A Fully integrated W-band beamformer in 0.13 _m SiGe
BiCMOS technology based on distributed true-time-delay
architecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE International
Nanoelectronics Conference (INEC),Chengdu, China, 911 May
2016.
[2] Perera, S.M.; Ariyarathna, V.; Udayanga, N.; Madanayake, A.;
Wu, G.; Belostotski, L.; Wang, Y.; Mandal, S.;Cintra, R.J.;
Rappaport, T.S.Wideband N-beam arrays using low-complexity
algorithms and mixed-signal integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top.
Signal Process. 2018, 12, 368382
[3] Madanayake, A.; Ariyarathna, V.; Udayanga, N.; Belostotski, L.;
Perera, S.K.; Cintra, R.J. Design of a low-complexity wideband
analog true-time-delay 5 Beam array in 65 nm CMOS. In
Proceedings of the IEEE International Midwest Symposium on
Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Boston, MA, USA, 69 August
2017.
[4] R. Gómez-García, J. Muñoz-Ferreras and D. Psychogiou, "Fully-
reconfigurable bandpass filter with static couplings and intrinsic-
switching capabilities," 2017 IEEE MTT-S International
Microwave Symposium (IMS), 2017, pp. 914-917.
[5] Rasekh, A., & Sharif Bakhtiar, M. “Design of Low-Power Low-
Area Tunable Active RC Filters”, (2018). IEEE Transactions on
Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 65(1), 6 10.
[6] K., S., & Babu, B. C. (2022). A Novel Adaptive Bandpass Filter
Based PLL for Grid Synchronization Under Distorted Grid
Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and
Measurement, 71, 111,2022.
[7] I. Shahid, D. Thalakotuna, D. K. Karmokar, S. J. Mahon and M.
Heimlich, "Periodic Structures for Reconfigurable Filter Design: A
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
337
Volume 21, 2022
Comprehensive Review," in IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 22,
no. 11, pp. 38-51, Nov. 2021.
[8] Kumar, A., & Kartikeyan, M.”Design and realization of microstrip
filters with new defected ground structure (DGS)”, (2017)
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal,
20(2), 679686.
[9] Rusdi, M., Batubara, F. A., Anugrahwaty, R., Junaidi, Alifuddin,
S., & Harianto, B. “Design of Dual band Bandpass Filter for GSM
950 MHz and GSM 1850 MHz Applications using Lumped
Component”,(2017) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890,
012049.
[10] Garakoui, S.K.; Klumperink, E.; Nauta, B.; van Vliet, F. Compact
cascadable gm-c all-pass true time delay cell with reduced delay
variation over frequency. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2015, 50,
693703.
[11] Mondal, I.; Krishnapura, N. A 2 GHz bandwidth, 0.251.7 ns true-
time-delay element using a variable-order all-pass filter
architecture in 0.13 _m cmos. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2017,
52, 21802193.
[12] Maheshwari, S. Tuning approach for first-order filters and new
current-mode circuit example. IET Circuits Devices Syst. 2018, 12,
478485.
TABLE 4. Performance summary and comparison between similar all pass filters.
[13] Bult, K.;Wallinga, H. A cmos analog continuous-time delay line
with adaptive delay-time control. IEEE J.Solid-State Circuits 1988,
23, 759766.
[14] Ulusoy, A.; Schleicher, B.; Schumacher, H. A tunable differential
all-pass filter for uwb true time delay and phase shift applications.
IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2011, 21, 462464.
[15] Ahmadi, P.; Maundy, B.; Elwakil, A.S.; Belostotski, L.;
Madanayake, A. A new 2nd-order all-pass filter in 130 nm cmos.
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Br. 2016, 63, 249253.
[16] Ahmadi, P.; Taghavi, M.H.; Belostotski, L.; Madanayake, A. 6-
GHz all-pass-filter-based delay-and-sum beamformer in 130 nm
CMOS. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Midwest
Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), College Station,
TX, USA, 36 August 2014.
[17] Ahmadi, P.; Belostotski, L.; Madanayake, A.; Haslett, J.W. 0.96-
to-5.1 GHz 4-element spatially analog IIR-enhanced delay-and-
sum beamformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International
Microwave Symposium (IMS), Honolulu, HI, USA, 49 June
2017.
[18] Chen, Y.; Li, W. An ultra-wideband pico-second true-time-delay
circuit with differential tunable active inductor. Analog Integr.
Circuits Signal Process. 2017, 91, 919.
[19] Elamien, M. B., Sheldon, A., Maundy, B. J., Belostotski, L., &
Elwakil, A. S. “Delay-Tunable Compact RC-Only All-Pass
Filter”,2018 IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters,
31(5), 461464.
[20] Z. Huang and H. C. Luong, “Design and Analysis of Millimeter-
Wave Digitally Controlled Oscillators With C-2C Exponentially
Scaling Switched-Capacitor Ladder,” IEEE Transactions on
Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1299
1307, Jun. 2017.
[21] F. Haddad, et al., “Multi-Band Inductor-Less VCO for IoT
Applications”, IEEE Int. Symposium on Circuits and Systems
(ISCAS),USA, pp. 1-4, 2017
Reference
Technology
Mode
Frequency
(GHz)
Max.
Delay
(ps)
Bandwidth
(GHz)
Power
consumption
(mW/V)
Gain
(dB)
Noise
(µV)
[10]
140nm CMOS
Voltage
1-2.5
550
1.75
102/1.5
1.4
N/A
[14]
SiGe2RFHBT
Voltage
3-10
75
4.1
38.8/2.5
4
N/A
[15]
130nm CMOS
Voltage
6-7
55
6
18.5/1.5
7.5
N/A
[16]
130nm CMOS
Voltage
6-9
33
4
20.4/1.5
11
N/A
[17]
130nm CMOS
Current
0.9-5.1
82
N/A
6.15/1.5
-22
N/A
[18]
180nm CMOS
Voltage
3-12
6
7.5
12/1.8
-8
N/A
[19]
65nm CMOS
Voltage
0.4-2
30-57
7.7
2.74/2
-4.7
N/A
This work
(Reconfigura
ble filter)
65nm CMOS
Voltage
0.1-15
1.62
12.6
2.52/2
15.5
6.65
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23202.2022.21.36
Md Tanzim Ahmed, Manash Pratim Sarma, Nikos E Mastorakis
E-ISSN: 2224-2678
338
Volume 21, 2022
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US