Deriving (16) with respect to the parameter v we
have:
-2λ11asinv + 2λ12acosv - 3(λ11 - 2)scosusinv
+ 3λ12scosucosv = 0. (17)
Multiplying (16) by sinv and (17) by cosv and
adding the resulting equations, we obtain:
λ12(2a + 3rcosu) = 0 λ12 = 0.
Following the same procedure, we also get λ21 = 0.
Thus relations (14) and (15) become:
a =λ11acos2u + (λ11 - 2)scos3u,
a =λ22acos2u + (λ22 - 2)scos3u.
From the last two equations, we conclude that
λ11, and λ22 depend on the parameter u and are not
constants, and hence relation (1) cannot be satisfied
so we proved
Proposition 1. The position vector of a parametric
representation of an anchor ring (8) does not satisfy
the relation ΔIIIr = Ar.
Case II. β ≠ 0.
Recalling equations (7), then we can write these
equations as follows:
βTi + 2s
3cos4ψNi -
2cosψNi + 2s
3sinψcos3ψBi -
-λi1
3(c1cos3ψ + scos4ψN1 + scos3ψsinψB1) -
-λi2
3(c2cos3ψ + scos4ψN2 + scos3ψsinψB2) -
-λi3
3(c3cos3ψ + scos4ψN3 + scos3ψsinψB3) = 0,
i =1, 2, 3,
We also rewrite it in terms of cosψ as follows:
βTi -
2cosψNi + s
3(2Ni - λi1N1 - λi2N2 -
λi3N3)cos4ψ +
+ s
3(2Bi - λi1B1 - λi2B2 - λi3B3)cos3ψsinψ –
3(λi1c1 + λi2c2 + λi3c3)cos3ψ = 0,
i = 1, 2, 3.
The above equations for i =1, 2, 3, are
polynomials of the variables cosψ, sinψ with
coefficients functions of the variable v. To be the
last equations satisfied for all i = 1, 2, 3, then the
coefficients functions of these polynomials must
equal zeros. So we must have:
λi1c1 + λi2c2 + λi3c3 = 0,
2Ni - λi1n1 - λi2N2 - λi3N3 = 0,
2Bi - λi1B1 - λi2B2 - λi3B3 = 0,
βTi -
2cosψ Ni = 0, (18)
i = 1, 2, 3.
Since relation (18) holds for all i = 1, 2, 3, then
we write (18) in vector notation as follows:
βT +
2cosψ N = 0,
from which we obtain that β = 0 and
= 0. Hence
Ѣ is an anchor ring, a case that has been investigated
previously. So we proved:
Theorem 1. There are no tubular surfaces in the
three-dimensional Euclidean space whose position
vector satisfies the relation
IIIr = Ar.
4 Conclusion
This research article was divided into three sections,
where after the introduction, the needed definitions
and relations regarding this interesting field of study
were given. Then a formula for the Laplace operator
corresponding to the first, second, and third
fundamental forms of a surface Q were defined.
Finally, we classified the tubular surfaces satisfying
the relation Δr = Ar, for a real square matrix A of
order 3. It is also interesting if this type of research
can be applied to other families of surfaces that have
not been studied yet such as spiral surfaces, or
cyclides of Dupin.
Acknowledgement:
We thank the anonymous referees for their
insightful comments which led to substantial paper
improvements.
References:
[1] B.-Y. Chen, Some open problems and
conjectures on submanifolds of finite type,
Soochow J. Math, Vol. 17, 1991.
[2] J. S. Ro, D. W. Yoon. Tubes of Weingarten
types in Euclidean 3-space, J. Cungcheong
Math. Soc. Vol. 22 (2009), 359-366.
[3] H. Alzaareer, H. Al-Zoubi, F. Abed Al-Fattah,
Quadrics with finite Chen-type Gauss map,
Journal of Prime Research in Mathematics,
Vol.18 No. 1, 2022, 96-107.
[4] B.-Y. Chen, F. Dillen, Quadrics, of finite type,
J. Geom. Vol. 38, 1990, 16-22.
[5] D.-S. Kim, On the Gauss map of quadric
hypersurfaces, J. Korean Math. Soc. 31
(1994), 429–437.
[6] B. Senousi, H. Al-Zoubi, Translation surfaces
of finite type in Sol3, Commentationes
Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, Vol.
22, No. 2, 2020, pp 237–256.
[7] M. Bekkar and B. Senoussi, Translation
surfaces in the 3-dimensional space satisfying
III ri= λ i ri, J. Geom., 103 (2012), 367-374.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS and CONTROL
DOI: 10.37394/23203.2024.19.3
Hassan Al-Zoubi, Hamza Alzaareer,
Mohammad Al-Rawajbeh, Mohammad Al-Kafaween