
Table 6: Results comparison of different CNN
models.
5 Conclusion
In the present research context, it is considered with
KAGGLE dataset for the analysis of the classifier
performance. Initially, MRI image denoising was
done using Anisotropic diffusion filter. In the
training phase for CNN classifier it achieved with
the almost four hundred normal images, eight
hundred images with glioma, eight hundred images
with meningioma and eight hundred images with
pituitary tumor, in total around three thousand
images were considered for the data model. The
designed Convolutional Neural Networks were
aimed to identify the type of brain tumor from the
database under consideration with the classifier
approach is carried out with 100 image sets with
glioma tumor,115 images with meningioma
tumor,74 images with pituitary tumor and 105
normal images making in total of 394 image sets. A
hybrid CNN model has been presented, with feed
forward neural network as a seed, with the
incremental values of epochs, it is assured to have
higher accuracy due to higher rate of training states.
An individual Epoch is defined as the entire process
to reach the output layer from the input layer for the
calculation of the Accuracy, Precision, Specificity,
Sensitivity and F1 score. It is observed from the
results that 69% of accuracy for the first CNN
model. When the number of layers and epochs were
increased in the second model, the accuracy was
increased to 71%. Finally, by using the pre-trained
model 98% accuracy was achieved. The major gain
in the classifier proposed to the MRI images of the
brain was more accurate when a pre-trained model
was used. Other factor of improvement as a future
scope is to minimize the processing time to process
the tumor images as a design constraint.
References:
[1] NBTS, National Brain Tumor Society:
Quick brain tumor facts, 2021. Available
from:https://braintumor.org/brain-tumor-
information/brain-tumor-facts/.
[2] Badza, M.M. Barjaktarovic,
M.C,“Classification of Brain Tumors from
MRI Images Using a Convolutional Neural
Network”. Appl.Sci,MDPI, Basel,
Switzerland,March 2020.
[3] T. Ruba, R. Tamil selvi, M.
ParisaBehamand,N.Aparna,“Accurate
Classification and Detection of Brain Cancer
Cells in MRI and CT Images using Nano
Contrast Agents”,Biomedical&
Pharmacology Journal, Vol. 13(3), p. 1227-
1237,September 2020.
[4] K.Kalaiselvi, C. Karthikeyan, M. Shenbaga
Devi, C. Kalpana, “Improved Classification
of Brain Tumor in MR Images using RNN
Classification Framework”, International
Journal of Innovative Technology and
Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN:
2278-3075, Volume-9 Issue-3, 1098-1101,
January 2020
[5] Gokalp Cınarer, Bülent Gursel Emiroglu,
Recep Sinan Arslan, Ahmet Haşim
Yurttakal, “Brain Tumor Classification
Using Deep Neural Network”, Advances in
Science, Technology and Engineering
Systems Journal Vol. 5, No. 5, 765-
769,October 2020.
[6] Venkata Ramakrishna Sajja, Hemantha
Kumar Kalluri,“Classification of Brain
Tumors Using Convolutional Neural
Network over Various SVM Methods”
International Information and Engineering
Technology Association, Vol.25,No.4,489-
495,August 2020.
[7] Muhammad Attique Khan, et.al.
“Multimodal Brain Tumor Classification
Using Deep Learning and Robust Feature
Selection: A Machine Learning Application
for Radiologists”, Diagnostics,MDPI, Basel,
Switzerland, August 2020.
[8] Hassan Ali Khan, Wu Jue, Muhammad
Mushtaq and Muhammad Umer
Mushtaq.”Brain tumor classification in MRI
image using convolutional neural network”,
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering,
Volume 17, Issue 5, 6203–6216, September
2020.
[9] Dr.R.C.Suganthe, G.Revathi, S.Monisha,
R.Pavithran, “Deep Learning Based Brain
Tumor Classification Using Magnetic
Resonance Imaging”,Journal of Critical
Reviews,ISSN- 2394-5125,Vol 7, Issue
9,May 2020.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS and CONTROL
DOI: 10.37394/23203.2022.17.22
Shwetha V., C. H. Renu Madhavi