Direct Fractional-Order Adaptive Control Design for Cascaded Doubly-
Fed Induction Generator (CDFIG) in a Wind Energy System
SIHEM DJEBBRI1, SAMIR LADACI2,*
1Department of Electrical Engineering,
20 August 1955 University,
Elhadaiek, Skikda 21000,
ALGERIA
2Department of Automatic Control Engineering,
Ecole Nationale Polytechnique,
El Harrach, 16200, Algiers,
ALGERIA
*Corresponding Author
Abstract: - This paper is devoted to a fractional-order model reference adaptive control (FO-MRAC) synthesis
for the independent control of the active and reactive power flows in the cascaded doubly fed induction
generator (CDFIG) in wind energy systems. The proposed adaptive control law combines a second-order-like
fractional reference model and a direct MIT adaptation law using a fractional order integrator. This generator
configuration can be an interesting alternative to standard double-output wound rotor induction generators. It is
made up of two identical wound rotor induction motors such that their rotors are mechanically and electrically
coupled. Using two cascaded induction machines permits the elimination of the brushes and copper rings in the
traditional doubly-fed induction generator DFIG, which makes the system more resistant and reduces
maintenance costs. In the first step, we propose a classical PI controller synthesis to regulate the active and
reactive power produced by CDFIG. Then, the FO-MRAC design is realized and a comparative study based on
numerical simulations is performed between the classical regulators PI, MRAC, and FO- MRAC, to
demonstrate the superiority of the proposed fractional-order adaptive controller relative to conventional integer
order PI and MRAC controllers. These results illustrate the reliability and efficiency of the proposed adaptive
control scheme.
Key-Words: - MRAC, FOMRAC, Direct fractional adaptive control, Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction
Generators, Variable Speed Generator, Active-Power, Reactive Power, Wind Energy System.
Received: April 5, 2024. Revised: August 21, 2024. Accepted: October 3, 2024. Published: November 5, 2024.
1 Introduction
For more than three centuries, a great number of
researchers have concentrated on fractional calculus,
[1]. Since its beginning in 1695, fractional calculus
has established itself as one of the most productive
and current branches of modern mathematics, [2].
The fields of application of these fractional
operators are varied and affect practically all
specialties of engineering and science.
As far as we are concerned in this work,
fractional order control and its application in
renewable energy systems and electrical machines
have been the subjects of a sustained research effort
bringing several innovations to increase efficiency
and the effectiveness of these systems, [3], [4], [5],
[6], [7].
Fractional adaptive control is a very recent and
hot research topic, gathering more and more interest
these recent years because of the improvement
obtained in the control system performance when
compared to the classical adaptive control schemes,
[8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. The reason for this
enthusiasm lies in its extraordinary simplicity to
implement and its ability to augment the system's
dynamic performance and robustness when
compared to conventional adaptive control
techniques, [13], [14].
A plethora of applications using fractional-order
model reference adaptive control (FOMRAC)
configurations can be found in literature, covering a
wide range of science and engineering domains like
Voltage control of DC/DC converter in multi-
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
374
Volume 19, 2024
sources renewable energy systems [15], in multi-
source renewable energy system using fractional-
order integrals, [16]. In the wind energy system,
using adaptive control of a Doubly Fed Induction
Generator (DFIG) and Cascaded Doubly-Fed
Induction Generators using a fractional-order PIλ
controller, [17]. Recently, fractional adaptive
control schemes based on fractional order identified
models have been developed with interesting
results, [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Today wind
parks occupy a very considerable place in the field
of the production of electrical energy, [23]. Indeed,
thanks on the one hand to the sensitivity and the
importance of the sector of energy production and
on the other hand to the development and
consequently to the various structures of the chains
of production [24], [25], [26], the windmills play a
dominating role to satisfy the energy needs and the
economic requirements.
Wind energy systems are generally equipped
with asynchronous machines with double-fed
induction generators (DFIG) functioning at variable
speeds, [27], [28], [29]. Unfortunately, in this
structure of conversion, the presence of the system
ring brushes reduces the reliability of the machine,
[30]. However, with regard to this work, we propose
to study the performance of windmill chains where
two DFIG are coupled electrically and mechanically
via their rotors, in order to improve the
performances of the production chains.
Proportional-integral (PI) controllers are the
most commonly used for such energy processes,
unfortunately, the adjustment of controller
parameters is not a simple task and usually needs a
continuous correction. Besides, the parameters
obtained analytically or by simulation usually fail in
practice. These PI controllers can guarantee good
dynamic response during nominal conditions, but
they may lose their performance during the grid
disturbances mainly because the stator flux is not
constant [17].
Fig. 1: CDFIG configuration for wind power
generation
To compensate for these drawbacks, a design
and implementation of a FOMRAC controller for
the CDFIG is presented in this paper. The active and
reactive power quantity is controlled in order to
track permanently the maximum aerodynamic
power of wind energy.
This paper presents the synthesis and
implementation of a fractional order model
reference adaptive control (FO-MRAC) in order to
regulate the active and reactive power of a grid-
connected wind turbine based on a cascade doubly
fed induction generator CDFIG.
This manuscript is structured as follows: First,
we introduce the Modelization of the CDFIG
Generator by electric, magnetic, and power
equations. Then the control systemusing a classical
PI controller and the proposed fractional-order
MRAC power control is defined for a CDFIG
system. Then, a comparative study of simulation
results is realized and discussed to show the
superiority of the proposed adaptive control strategy
applied to the cascaded doubly fed induction
Generators CDFIG. Finally, concluding remarks are
given with future research vectors on this topic.
2 Modelization of the Cascaded
Doubly Fed Generator CDFIG
Thus, the structure of the chains of production is
illustrated in Figure 1. The stator of the first
machine is connected directly to the electrical
supply network on the other hand the stator of the
second machine is connected to the same network
via a frequency converter that we suppose ideal,
[31], [32], [33].
Fig. 2: Mechanical and electric connections of
CDFIG
The two DFIG configurations for rotor
connection are possible. Connecting the same
phases results in a direct connection or reversing the
two phases gives an opposite connection, [34]. In
our case, is it is considered that the two rotors are
connected in this last configuration illustrated in
Figure 2.
In the following paragraph, we present the
modelling of the CDFIG in the Park reference, and
then the control of active and reactive powers transit
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
375
Volume 19, 2024
between the wind generator and the electrical supply
network, [35].
2.1 Electric Equations
First machine:
)1(
..
..
.
.
11111
1
11111
1
1111
1
1111
1
drrsqrqrr
qr
qrrsdrdrr
dr
dssqsqss
qs
qssdsdss
ds
dt
d
iRV
dt
d
iRV
dt
d
iRV
dt
d
iRV
Second machine:
)2(
..
..
..
..
21222
2
21222
2
221222
2
221222
2
drrsqrqrr
qr
qrrsdrdrr
dr
dsrrsqsqss
qs
qsrrsdsdss
ds
dt
d
iRV
dt
d
iRV
dt
d
iRV
dt
d
iRV
According to the configuration of Figure 2, we can
deduce the following relations:
21
21
21
21
qrqrqr
drdrdr
qrqrqr
drdrdr
iii
iii
et
VVV
VVV
(3)
The preceding equations can be expressed in the
state space form,
(4)
Where,
T
qsdsqsds iiiiX ]00[ 2211
(5)
T
qs
ds
qr
dr
qs
ds dt
di
dt
di
dt
di
dt
di
dt
di
dt
di
U][ 2
2
1
1
(6)
.
).(0).(00
).().(000
0).()()).((0).(
).(0)).(()().(0
000
000
2221221
2212221
212121111
212112111
111
111
ssrrsmrrs
srrssmrrs
mrsrrrrrsmrs
mrsrrrsrrmrs
mssss
mssss
RLL
LRL
LRRLLL
LLLRRL
LRL
LLR
A
(7)
22
22
2211
2211
11
11
0000
0000
000
000
0000
0000
sm
sm
mrrm
mrrm
ms
ms
LL
LL
LLLL
LLLL
LL
LL
B
(8)
2.2 Magnetic Equations
First machine:
1111
1111
1111
1111
.
.
.
.
qsmqrrqr
dsmdrrdr
qrmqssqs
drmdssds
iLiL
iLiL
iLiL
iLiL
(9)
Second machine:
2222
2222
2222
2222
.
.
.
.
qsmqrrqr
dsmdrrdr
qrmqssqs
drmdssds
iLiL
iLiL
iLiL
iLiL
(10)
2.3 Powers Equations
The active and reactive powers relating to the stator
of the first machine and that of the second are
respectively defined by the relations (11) and (12).
11111
11111
..
..
qsdsdsqss
qsqsdsdss
iViVQ
iViVP
(11)
22222
22222
..
..
qsdsdsqss
qsqsdsdss
iViVQ
iViVP
(12)
thus:
21
21
ssg
ssg
QQQ
PPP
(13)
2.4 Mechanical Equations
The expression of the electromagnetic couple is
given as:
)..(.)..(. 22221111 qrdsqsdrmqrdsqsdrme iiiiLPiiiiLPC
(14)
With the dynamical equation:
.fCC
dt
d
Jre
(15)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
376
Volume 19, 2024
3 Control System Design
The CDFIG is connected to the network via its first
stator while controlling the sizes of the second
stator. We control the active and reactive power
which transit by stator 1, not to overload stator 1 in
the case where the aerodynamic power is higher
than the acceptable power of stator1, which returns,
in this case, to create a second way, via stator 2. We
use the biphasic modelling of the machine with
direct reference (dq) in order to align the axis don
the stator flows ϕs.
0
1
11
qs
sds
(16)
For the machines of great power, we can neglect
the resistance of the stator, [36]. Under these
conditions, we have:
11
1
.
0
sssqs
ds
VV
V
( 17)
By replacing the flow and the tension of the first
stator in the whole of the equations, we will have:
21
21
1
121
.
..
.
..
qsqr
mss
sm
dsdr
iCi
LL
VL
CiCi
(18)
2
1
1
11
2
1
1
1
21
2
11
1
1
.
.
.
.
1
.
qs
s
m
qs
ds
s
m
ms
m
ss
s
ds
i
L
L
Ci
i
L
L
C
LL
LC
L
V
i
(19)
1
1
12212
2
212222
2212
2
212222
.
..).(.)(.
).(.)(.
s
sm
dsmss
qs
msqssqs
qsmss
ds
msdssds
L
VL
sCiLCLs
dt
di
LCLiRV
iLCLs
dt
di
LCLiRV
(20)
2
1
1
1
21
2
11
1
2
1
2
1
1
11
..
.
.
1
.
...
ds
s
m
s
ms
m
ss
s
s
qs
s
m
ss
i
L
L
VC
LL
LC
L
V
Q
i
L
L
VCP
(21)
Where,
1
2
1
21
2
1
s
m
rr
m
L
L
LL
L
C
(22)
With,
s
rs
s
rrs PP
sss
.
.2121
21
(23)
and,
s
rs
s
rs s
Ps
s
P
s
.
.
,
.
1
21
2
1
1
3.1 PI Regulators Synthesis
The adjustment loop is illustrated by the diagram in
Figure 3. The used regulator is a proportional-
integral (PI) controller. It is simple to implement
and ensures the desired performance for a best fit of
its coefficients, [37].
Fig. 3: Active and reactive power with PI control
Fig. 4: Power control block diagram
Figure 4 represents the block diagram of the PI
control system implementation.
p
K
and
i
K
denote
the proportional and integral gains respectively,
[38].
The pole compensation technique is used for
their computation with a 10 ms time response
specification. This constant time is fixed based on
the plant dynamics and avoids transient behavior
with important overshoots for lower values. The
obtained gains are:
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
377
Volume 19, 2024
2
2
2
2
..
.2
.2
.2
MVK
MLLL
T
MLLL
MLLR
K
K
sp
srs
r
srs
srs
p
i
(24)
Taking a response time: Tr =10ms, we will get:
Kp =0.0001185312; Ki =0.001842.
3.2 Proposed Fractional order MRAC
Control
Adaptive control is a control technique that provides
an efficient approach for automatic controller
adjustment in real-time, aiming to achieve or to
maintain a specified level of performance in
the presence of unknown or slowly varying
parameters.
The control system measures a predefined
objective function of the system behavior using the
input, the states, the outputs, and the known
disturbances. The main concept in Model Reference
Adaptive control is to make the closed-loop control
system able to update the controller parameters in
order to change the system response. A comparator
computes the gap between the system output and the
desired reference model response in real time. This
error signal is used to update the control parameters.
This configuration allows the parameters to
converge to ideal values and thus, the plant output
tracks the desired response.
In the proposed MRAC control scheme this
updating law is based on a fractional order integral
and aims to improve the plant behavior, [39].
3.2.1 Fractional-order Systems
The description equation of a fractional order
process may be given in the frequency domain as:
)
p
s
(1
k
X(s)
(25)
where,
α: fractional exponent.
p: fractional pole which is the cut frequency,
s: Laplace operator.
The literature presents a number of works that
demonstrate the advantage of using fractional-order
systems with their inherent good properties in
dynamics performance and robustness, [40].
3.2.2 Approximation of Fractional Order
Systems
The singularity function method [41] is used here to
approximate the fractional order transfer functions.
For fractional second order system with α a positive
real number such that 0<α<1,
12
²
²
1
)( ss
sH
(26)
Can be expressed as:
12
²
²
1
1
)(
ss
ss
sH
(27)
with
and
21
, which can also be
approximated by the function (19):
N
ii
N
ii
p
s
z
s
ss
s
sH
1
1
1
)1(
)1(
12
²
²
1
)(
(28)
3.2.3 Model Reference Adaptive Control
The difference between the plant output and the
reference model one is used for the controller
parameter adjustment. This can be illustrated in
Figure 3.
The formula given below is used to calculate the
control signal,
.
T
u
(29)
Where
is the regression vector representing the
measured input signals u and output signal y and the
input reference signal uc. The resulting algorithm is
illustrated by the block-scheme block scheme of
Figure 5.
Fig. 5: Direct Model Reference Adaptive Control
3.2.4 M.I.T. Rule
The regulator in the closed loop system is supposed
to have an adjustable parameter vector
. The output
is ym of the reference model and defines the desired
closed-loop behaviour, [42]. Let e be the gap
between the closed loop system output y and the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
378
Volume 19, 2024
model one ym, we can adjust the parameters in a way
to make:
2
e
2
1
)(J
(30)
be minimized. With the aim to render J small the
method is to vary parameters in the direction of
negative gradient J, so:
e
e
J
dt
d
(31)
which leads to the following blocs scheme of Figure
6.
Fig. 6: Adaptation algorithm
3.2.5 Introducing Fractional Integration
There are several mathematical definitions for the
integration and the fractional order derivation.
These definitions always do not lead to identical
results but are equivalent for a broad range of
functions, [43]. Three definitions significant and
largely applied and the most met are the definition
of Riemann-Liouville, the definition of Caputo and
the definition of Grünwald-Letnikov which is
perhaps most known because of its greater aptitude
for the realization of a discrete algorithm, [44].
Let
C
,
0)(
,
Rc
and f a locally
integrable function defined on [c,+[. The order
integral of f, of lower bound c is defined as:
t
c
cdf
t
tI
)(
)(
)(
)(f
1
(32)
With
ct
, and
is the Euler function. The
formula (32) is called Riemann-Liouville Integral.
Generally, the control system is discreet, so we use
a sampled approximation of (33) given by:
1
0
1)()(
)(
)(
k
cfkkfI
(33)
With,
: Sampling Period.
In the tuning algorithm illustrated by the block
scheme of Figure 4, we introduce a fractional
integration of non-zero positive real order α such
that: 0 <α< 2. We get the:
ey
s
yyy
smmm
)(
(34)
3.2.6 Application of Model Reference Adaptive
Control to CDFIG Active and Reactive
Power Control
The block diagram of the MRAC control of active
and reactive power of the CDFIG is shown in Figure
7, by adding the parameters of the CDFIG system
presented in Table 1.
Fig. 7: MRAC of active and reactive power for
CDFIG
Table 1. Characteristic parameters of the CDFIG.
Parameter
Value
Vg
690 V
P1=P2
2 pairs of pôles.
P
1.5 Mw
Rs1= Rs2
0.012 Ω
Rr1= Rr2
0.021Ω
Ls1= Ls2
0.0137H
Lr1= Lr2
0.0137 H
Lm1=Lm1
0.0135 H
f
50 Hz
f1=f2
0.0071 (N.m.s)/rad
J1=J2
50 Kg.m2.
4 Results and Discussion
In this section, we will have the results of
the simulation of the uncoupled control from the
active and reactive powers generated doubly fed
induction generator CDFIG of the wind energy,
using Classical PI controller, then adaptive control
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
379
Volume 19, 2024
with integer reference model MRAC and fractional
order model FO-MRAC, whose objective is to
compare the responses of active and reactive powers
compared to the references desire.
4.1 PI Controllers
The simulation results using the classical PI
controller are given in Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10,
Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13.
Fig. 8: CDFIG active power Ps1 for direct control
with PI regulator
Fig. 9: CDFIG active power Ps2 for direct control
with PI regulator
Fig. 10: CDFIG active power Ps1, Ps2 for direct
control with PI regulator
Fig. 11: Zoom of CDFIG active power Ps1, Ps2 for
direct control with PI regulator
Fig. 12: CDFIG reactive power Qs1, Qs2 for direct
control with regulator
Fig. 13: Zoom of CDFIG reactive power for direct
control with PI regulator
4.2 MRAC Control
4.2.1 Using an Integer Order Reference Model
The system is described using the bloc scheme of
Figure 3 and the reference model has the following
transfer function:
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜 
 
(35)
According to characteristics of the studied system,
we chose the reference model as follows:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜  
(36)
RST Regulator parameters design (integer
MRAC, m=1):
Using the equation linking the studied system and
the RST configuration, we have:
A R + B S = Ar = A0 Am (37)
The parameters k, l and m represent respectively the
degrees of the polynomials R, S and T with:
A=1 the order of denominator of system
B= 0 the order of nominator of the system
Am= the order of denominator of the model
R= of order 1 for balance, we take:
k=degR=1 , l= degS=1 and m= degT=1.
Therefore, the vector of regulation parameters is:
10100 ttssr
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time(sec)
Actie power Ps1(Mw)
Ps1 with PI
Ps1ref
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Time(sec)
Active power Ps2(Mw)
Ps2 with PI
Ps2ref
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (sec)
Active power Ps1(Mw) Ps2(Mw)
Ps1ref
Ps1 with PI
Ps2ref
Ps2 with PI
3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Time (sec)
Active power Ps1(Mw) Ps2(Mw)
Ps1ref
Ps1 with PI
Ps2ref
Ps2 with PI
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Time(sec)
ReactivePowerQs1(MVAR)Qs2(MVAR)
Qs1withPI
Qs1ref
Qs2 ref
Qs1 with PI
3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Time(sec)
ReactivePowerQs1(MVAR)Qs2(MVAR)
Qs1withPI
Qs1ref
Qs2 ref
Qs1 with PI
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
380
Volume 19, 2024
cc
m
TUsUYsYU
AA
b
0
0
(38)
Figure 14 illustrates the open-loop step response
of the cascaded doubly fed generator whereas
Figure 15 represents its Bode diagram.
Fig. 14: Step response of the open-loop of cascaded
doubly fed induction Generator power system
Fig. 15: Bode diagram of the open-loop of cascaded
doubly fed induction Generator CDFIG power
system (blue) and model (red)
4.2.2 Integer order MRAC Controller of CDFIG
Figure 16, Figure 17 and Figure 18 represent the
active power output for power machine Ps1, the
error signal and the control signal respectively using
the integer order MRAC control.
Fig. 16: Active power output control of Power
machine Ps1 with integer order reference model
MRAC
Fig. 17: Error signal with MRAC control in integer
order reference model control of Power machine
Fig. 18: Control signal with MRAC and integer
order reference model control of Power machine
Fig. 19: Active power output control of Control
Machine Ps2 with integer order reference model
MRAC control
Figure 19, Figure 20 and Figure 21 represent the
active power output for power machine Ps2, the
error signal and the control signal respectively using
the integer order MRAC control.
Fig. 20: Error signal with MRAC control and
integer order reference model of Control Machine
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6x 104Step Response
Time (seconds)
Amplitude
-100
-50
0
50
100
Magnitude (dB)
100101102103104105
-180
-135
-90
-45
0
Phase (deg)
Bode Diagram
Frequency (rad/s)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time(sec)
Active power Ps1 (MW)
Ps1 with MRAC
Reference power
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Time(sec)
Error signal
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4x 10-4
Time (sec)
Control signal
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Time(sec)
Active power Ps2(MW)
Ps2 with MRAC
Reference power
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Time(sec)
Error signal
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
381
Volume 19, 2024
Fig. 21: Control signal with MRAC and integer
order reference model of Control Machine
Figure 22 shows a comparative response of the
Power Machine Ps1 and Control Machine Ps2 with
integer order reference model MRAC.
Fig. 22: Active power output of Power Machine Ps1
and Control Machine Ps2 with integer order
reference model MRAC
Fig. 23: Reactive power output control of Power
Machine Qs1 with integer order reference model
MRAC
Fig. 24: Reactive power output control of Control
Machine Qs2 with integer order reference model
MRAC control
Figure 23 and Figure 24 represent the reactive
power output for power machine Qs1 and Qs2
respectively.
Fig. 25: Reactive power output of Power Machine
Qs1 and Control Machine Qs2with integer order
reference model MRAC control
Figure 25 shows the responses of the power
machine Qs1 and the control machine Qs2 using an
integer order MRAC controller.
Fig. 26: Comparative step response of the integer
and fractional order reference models
Figure 26 represents a comparative step
response of the integer order and the fractional order
reference models for different values of α.
4.3 FOMRAC Controllers Applied to CDFIG
Taking the desired reference model as a fractional
order second order-like transfer function of the form
(26) with α = 0.4, and using the singularity function
method we obtain the approximating rational
transfer function given by:
󰇛󰇜

 (39)
With , , , .
The time domain and frequency domain
responses of this chosen model compared to the
integer order one are illustrated in Figure 27 and
Figure 28 respectively.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8x 10-5
Time (sec)
Control signal
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time(sec)
Ps1 (MW) , Ps2 (MW)
Ps1 with MRAC
Ps1ref
Ps2 with MRAC
Ps2ref
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.5
0
0.5
1
Time (sec)
Reactive power (MVAR)
Qs1 with MRAC
Qs1ref
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Time(sec)
Reactive power Qs2 (MVAR)
Qs2 with MRAC
Qs2ref
Reactive Power
absorbed by the CDFIG
Magnetizing inductance
reactive power
Reactive Power
supplied by the CDFIG
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Time (sec)
Qs1(MVAR), Qs2(MVAR)
Qs1
Qs1ref
Qs2
Qs2ref
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Step Response
Time (seconds)
Amplitude
gm integer
Gap0.2
Gap0.3
Gap0.4
Gap0.5
Gap0.7
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
382
Volume 19, 2024
Fig. 27: Comparative step response of the integer
order reference model MRAC and the fractional
order reference model FOMRAC with α = 0.4
Fig. 28: Comparative bode diagram of the integer
and the fractional-order reference model for α = 0.4
Applying the fractional order MRAC control
scheme using the reference model (39) to the
CDFIG we obtain the simulation results of Figure
29, Figure 30, Figure 31, Figure 32, Figure 33 and
Figure 34.
A comparative study of these results for the
MRAC and FOMRAC controllers based on the
quadratic error criterion for active and reactive
power of power machine (Ps1, Qs1) and control
machine (Ps2, Qs2) is given in Table 2.
Fig. 29: Active power output of power machine
Ps1with FOMRAC for α=0.4
Fig. 30: Active power output of control machine
Ps2with FOMRAC for α=0.4
Fig. 31: Active power of Power Machine Ps1 and
Control Machine Ps2 with FOMRAC for α=0.4
Fig. 32: Reactive power of Power Machine Qs1 and
Control Machine Qs2 with FOMRAC for α=0.4
Fig. 33: Active power output comparison between
MRAC and FOMRAC for α = 0.4
Fig. 34: Reactive power comparison between
MRAC and FOMRAC for α = 0.4
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Step Response
Time (seconds)
Amplitude
gm integer
Gap0.4
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
Magnitude (dB)
101102103104105
-270
-180
-90
0
Phase (deg)
Bode Diagram
Frequency (rad/s)
gm
Gap0.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time(sec)
Ps1(MW)
Ps1 with FOMRAC
Ps1ref
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Time(sec)
Ps2(MW)
Ps2 with FOMRAC
Ps2ref
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time(sec)
Ps1(MW) ,Ps2(MW)
Ps1 FOMRAC
Ps1ref
Ps2 FOMRAC
Ps2ref
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Time (sec)
Qs1(MVAR) , Qs2(MVAR)
Qs1 FOMRAC
Qs1ref
Qs2 FOMRAC
Qs2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time(sec)
Ps1(MW)
Ps1 MRAC
Ps1ref
Ps1 FOMRAC
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Time(sec)
Ps1(MW)
Ps1 MRAC
Ps1ref
Ps1 FOMRAC
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Time(sec)
Qs2(MVAR)
Qs2 MRAC
Qs2ref
Qs2 FOMRAC
Zoo
m
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
383
Volume 19, 2024
Table 2. Comparative quadratic error criterion for
active and reactive power of power machine (Ps1,
Qs1) and control machine (Ps2, Qs2) with MRAC
and FOMRAC
Active Ps and
reactive power Qs
quadratic error criterion J
MRAC
FOMRAC
Ps1
4.8162
4.7242
Ps2
1.9413
1.8124
Qs1
0.0231
0.0175
Qs2
3.1845
3.0752
5 Discussions
Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed
control strategy using FO-MRAC with a fractional
order reference model is more powerful in regard to
the response time and overshoot than the classical
controllers with PI regulators (Figure 8, Figure 9,
Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13), or
even integer order MRAC (Figure 14, Figure 15,
Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure
20, Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23, Figure 24,
Figure 15 and Figure 26).
The active and reactive power responses using
PI regulators contain disturbances (see the zoom in
Figure 11 and Figure 13), because the parameters of
this regulator depend directly on the parameters of
the machine which presents variations over time.
These disturbances increase the joule effect losses
of the two machines, which causes a minimization
of the efficiency of the CDFIG cascade system and
reduces the lifespan of the machines and the
connected wind power system.
To remedy this drawback we proposed and
studied the control of the cascade of the two DFIG
machines by the use of the adaptive control with
integer reference model MRAC and fractional
FOMRAC, where the comparison between these
two techniques is illustrated in Figure 33 and Figure
34. They prove that the FO-MRAC control with
fractional-order reference gives better performance
than the integer order MRAC because the responses
of active and reactive power follow perfectly the
suggested references.
Also, Table 2 presents the active and reactive
power output comparison between the integer order
reference model MRAC and fractional order
reference model FOMRAC. It confirms that the
tracking error obtained for FO-MRAC is smaller
than that obtained for the MRAC in active and
reactive power control.
6 Conclusion
The idea to install a cascade of two DFIG in the
chains of wind conversion is a promising solution
for the stage with the disadvantage of the system
ring-brushes when only one DFIG is envisaged. The
order uncoupled from the powers proved to be
powerful, allowing even an operation with a unit
reactivity power coefficient.
Through the study carried out under wind
operation, one manages to control stator 1 through
stator 2.Stator 1 product always of energy activates
while following the reference.
Stator 2 product or consumes active and reactive
energy while following the speed of the wind. In
hyposynchronous, it consumes energy and in hyper-
synchronous it provides to the network energy, two
energies are varies independently one of the other,
which, is noticed that the variation of active energy
does not influence the pace of the reactive energy
which presents a value depending on magnetizing of
the magnetic circuit fixes then it takes a fixed and
null value in permanent mode.
Our work is a continuation and additional
confirmation of the effectiveness and the good
performances obtained by the use of the adaptive
fractional order control of active and reactive power
in wind energy systems comparatively with classical
control using PI controller; where we have started
this paper with modelling of the cascaded doubly
fed induction generator CDFIG, then we presented
the system control with classical PI regulator, after
that we proposed an adaptive control scheme with
both conventional MRAC and fractional order
model reference FOMRAC configurations. Then,
we performed the analysis, design, and numerical
implementation of these control actions with success
to the cascaded DFIG system.
These techniques are more powerful with regard
to the error, response time, and overshoot than the
classical control with PI regulators which are the
most commonly used, however, selection of
controller gains is not easy and is usually subject to
continuous adjustment. We conclude that the FO-
MRACadaptive controller is able to optimize the
energy transfers in wind energy plants.
Parameters of CDFIG
The used machines are identical:
P=1.5 MW ; Vg=690V
P1=P2=2; f1=f2= 0.0071N.m.s/rad;
J1=J2=50 Kg.m2.
Rs1= Rs2= 0.012Ω ; Rr1= Rr2= 0.021Ω ;
Ls1= Ls2= 0.0137H ; Lr1= Lr2= 0.0137 H ;
Lm1=Lm1= 0.0135H;
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
384
Volume 19, 2024
Nomenclatures:
CDFIG
Cascaded Doubly-Fed Induction Generator
DFIG
Doubly-Fed Induction Generator
Pi
Active power
Qi
Reactive power
Isi (i=1,2)
Stator currents
Idsi (i=1,2)
Stator currents on the axis d
Iqsi (i=1,2)
Stator currents on the axis q
Iar, ibr, icr :
Rotor currents
I.dr
Rotor current on the axis d
Iqr
rotor current on the axis q
s1
Slip of the 1st machine.
s2
Slip of the 2nd machine.
s
Slip of the cascade of two machines.
Ce
Electromagnetic couple
Cr
Resistive torque
J
Inertia of the revolving masses
f
Coefficient of viscous friction
Kp ;
Constant proportional of the regulator
Ki ;
Constant integral of the regulator
References:
[1] Oustaloup A, Sabatier J, Lanusse P, Malti R,
Melchior P, Moreau X, Moze M,An
overview of the CRONE approach in system
analysis, modeling and identification,
observation and control, IFAC Proceedings,
Volumes, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2008, pp. 14254-
14265. DOI: 10.3182/20080706-5-KR-
1001.02416.
[2] Monje CA, Chen YQ, Vinagre BM, Xue D,
Feliu V. Fractional-order Systems and
Controls: Fundamentals and Applications,
Springer-Verlag, London, 2010. DOI:
10.1007/978-1-84996-335-0.
[3] Sutha S, Lakshmi P, Sankaranarayanan S.
Fractional-order sliding mode controller
design for a modified quadruple tank process
via multi-level switching, Computers and
Electrical Engineering, Vol. 45, 2015, pp. 10–
21. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.04.012.
[4] Zamani M, Karimi-Ghartemani M, Sadati N,
Parniani M, Design of a fractional order PID
controller for an AVR using particle swarm
optimization, Control Engineering Practice,
Vol. 17, 2009, pp. 1380–1387. DOI:
10.1016/j.conengprac.2009.07.005.
[5] Gupta DK, Dei G, Soni AK, Jha AV,
Appasani B, Bizon N, Srinivasulu A,
Nsengiyumva P. Fractional order PID
controller for load frequency control in a
deregulated hybrid power system using
Aquila Optimization, Results in Engineering,
Vol. 23, 2024, 102442. DOI:
10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102442.
[6] Raj U, Shankar R. Optimally enhanced
fractional-order cascaded integral derivative
tilt controller for improved load frequency
control incorporating renewable energy
sources and electric vehicle. Soft Computing,
Vol. 27, 2023, pp. 15247–15267. DOI:
10.1007/s00500-023-07933-3.
[7] Alilou M, Azami H, Oshnoei A, Mohammadi-
Ivatloo B, Teodorescu R. Fractional-Order
Control Techniques for Renewable Energy
and Energy-Storage-Integrated Power
Systems: A Review. Fractal and Fractional,
Vol. 7, No. 5, 2023, 391. DOI:
10.3390/fractalfract7050391.
[8] Najari M, Balochian S, Adaptive Predictive
Control of Fractional Order Chaotic Systems,
Electrica, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2024, pp. 3-11.
DOI: 10.5152/electrica.2024.23047.
[9] Vinagre BM, Petras I, Podlubny I, Chen YQ.
Using fractional order adjustment rules and
fractional order reference models in model-
reference adaptive control. Nonlinear
Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 1–4, 2002, pp. 269–
279. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016504620249.
[10] Benchaita H, Ladaci S. Fractional adaptive
SMC fault tolerant control against actuator
failures for wing rock supervision, Aerospace
Science and Technology, Vol. 114, 2021,
106745. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106745.
[11] Perumal V, Kannan SK, Balamurugan CR.
Grid Mode Selection Scheme based on a
Novel Fractional Order Proportional Resonant
Controller for Hybrid Renewable Energy
Resources, Electric Power Components and
Systems, Vol. 51, No. 16, 2023, pp. 1710-
1729. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2023.2202674.
[12] Yan S-R, Dai Y, Shakibjoo AD, Zhu L,
Taghizadeh S, Ghaderpour E,
Mohammadzadeh A. A fractional-order
multiple-model type-2 fuzzy control for
interconnected power systems incorporating
renewable energies and demand response,
Energy Reports, Vol. 12, 2024, pp. 187-196.
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.06.018.
[13] Varga B, Tar JK, Horváth R, Fractional order
inspired iterative adaptive control, Robotica,
Vol. 42, No. 2, 2024, pp. 482-509. DOI:
10.1017/S0263574723001595.
[14] Aburakhis M, Ordóñez R. Generalization of
Direct Adaptive Control Using Fractional
Calculus Applied to Nonlinear Systems.
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical
Systems, Vol. 35, 2024, pp. 428–439. DOI:
10.1007/s40313-024-01082-0.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
385
Volume 19, 2024
[15] Saleem O, Ahmad KR, Iqbal J, Fuzzy-
Augmented Model Reference Adaptive PID
Control Law Design for Robust Voltage
Regulation in DC–DC Buck Converters,
Mathematics, Vol. 12, No. 12, 2024,1893.
DOI: 10.3390/math12121893.
[16] Djebbri S, Ladaci S, Metatla A, Balaska H.
Fractional-order model reference adaptive
control of a multi-source renewable energy
system with coupled DC/DC converters
power compensation, Energy Systems, Vol.
11, 2020, pp. 315–355. DOI: 10.1007/s12667-
018-0317-5.
[17] Djebbri S, Balaska H, Ladaci S. Robust
MRAC-based adaptive control of a Doubly
Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) in a Wind
energy system using a fractional order
Integrator, Algerian Journal of Signals and
Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2020, pp. 40–46.
DOI: 10.51485/ajss.v5i1.94.
[18] Lv Z-X, Liao J. Fractional-Order Model-Free
Adaptive Control with High Order Estimation,
Mathematics, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2024, 784. DOI:
10.3390/math12050784.
[19] Tian T, Hou X, Yan F, A new output feedback
adaptive control method for fractional order
systems with inaccessible state, Chinese
Journal of Physics, Vol. 90,2024, pp. 1046-
1056. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjph.2024.04.004.
[20] Aguila-Camacho N, Duarte-Mermoud MA.
Combined Fractional Adaptive Control,
IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2017,
pp. 8586-8591. DOI:
10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1423.
[21] Yan F, Hou X, Tian T. Fractional-Order
Multivariable Adaptive Control Based on a
Nonlinear Scalar Update Law, Mathematics,
Vol. 10, No. 18, 2022, 3385. DOI:
10.3390/math10183385.
[22] Wan Y, Zhang H, French M, Adjustable
Fractional Order Adaptive Control on Single-
Delay Regenerative Machining Chatter,
Journal of Fractional Calculus and
Applications, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2015, pp. 185-
207. DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/jfca.2015.306005.
[23] Zhang L. Wind Energy Development: History
and Current Status, Wind, Water and Fire.
2021, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1142/11985.
[24] Hannan MA, Al-Shetwi AQ, Mollik MS, Ker
PJ, Mannan M, Mansor M, Al-Masri HMK,
Mahlia TMI. Wind Energy Conversions,
Controls, and Applications: A Review for
Sustainable Technologies and Directions.
Sustainability, Vol. 15, 2023, 3986. DOI:
10.3390/su15053986.
[25] Dauksha G, Iwanski G. Indirect Power
Control of a Cascaded Brushless Doubly-Fed
Induction Generator Operating with
Unbalanced Power Grid, 2021 IEEE 19th
International Power Electronics and Motion
Control Conference (PEMC), Gliwice,
Poland, 25-29 April 2021. DOI:
10.1109/PEMC48073.2021.9432628.
[26] Boukettaya G, Naifar O, Ouali A, A vector
control of a cascaded doubly fed induction
generator for a wind energy conversion
system. 2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-
Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices
(SSD14), 11-14 February 2014. DOI:
10.1109/SSD.2014.6808821.
[27] Vasconcelos C, Stephan R, Ferreira AC,
Study of The Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction
Machine Dynamics Under Vector Control,
Eletrônica de Potência, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2018,
pp. 39-46. DOI: 10.18618/REP.2018.1.2719.
[28] Adamowicz M, Strzelecki R, Cascaded
doubly fed induction generator for mini and
micro power plants connected to grid, 2008
13th International Power Electronics and
Motion Control Conference, Poznan, Poland,
01-03 September 2008. DOI:
10.1109/EPEPEMC.2008.4635516.
[29] Din Z, Zhang J, Zhao J, Jiang Y. Doubly Fed
Induction Generator with Cascade Converter
for Improving Dynamic Performances, 2018
IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and
Exposition (ECCE), Portland, OR, USA, 23-
27 September 2018. DOI:
10.1109/ECCE.2018.8558069.
[30] Carlson R, Voltolini H, Runcos F, Peng PK, A
performance comparison between brush and
brushless doubly fed asynchronous generators
for wind power systems, Renewable Energy
and Power Quality Journal, Vol. 1, No. 4,
2006, pp. 258-262. DOI:
10.24084/repqj04.405.
[31] El Achkar M, Mbayed R, Salloum G, Patin
N, Monmasson E. Voltage Control of a Stand-
Alone Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction
Generator, IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Electronics, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2019, pp. 762-
771. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2856186.
[32] Sadeghi R, Madani SM, Agha-kashkooli M-R,
Ataei M. Reduced-order model of cascaded
doubly fed induction generator for aircraft
starter/generator, IET Electric Power
Applications, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2018, pp. 757-
766. DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0579.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
386
Volume 19, 2024
[33] Padamata AP, Rao GS. Modelling of Variable
Speed Wind Turbine Connected DFIG:
250KW, WSEAS Transactions on Power
Systems, Vol. 18, 2023, pp. 426-435. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37394/232016.2023.18.42.
[34] Louze L, Nemmour AL, Khezzar A, Hacil
ME, Boucherma M. Cascade sliding mode
controller for self-excited induction generator,
Revue des Energies Renouvelables, Vol. 12,
No. 4, 2009, pp. 617-626.
[35] Maafa A, Mellah H, Ghedamsi K, Aouzellag
D. 2022. Improvement of Sliding Mode
Control Strategy Founded on Cascaded
Doubly Fed Induction Generator Powered by
a Matrix Converter. Engineering, Technology
& Applied Science Research, Vol. 12, No. 5,
2022, pp. 9217–9223. DOI:
10.48084/etasr.5166.
[36] Dauksha G, Górski D, Iwański G. State-
feedback control of a grid-tied cascaded
brushless doubly-fed induction machine,
Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 228,
2024, 110043. DOI:
10.1016/j.epsr.2023.110043.
[37] Hete RR, Shrivastava T, Dash R, Anupallavi
L, Fathima M, Reddy KJ, Dhanamjayalu C,
Mohammad F & Khan B. Design and
development of PI controller for DFIG grid
integration using neural tuning method
ensembled with dense plexus terminals.
Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, 7916, 2024, DOI:
10.1038/s41598-024-56904-7.
[38] Nguyen DD, Than NH, Hoang DT. The
cascade methods of doubly-fed induction
machine for generator system, International
Journal of Power Electronics and Drive
Systems (IJPEDS), Vol. 12, No. 1, 2021, pp.
112-120. DOI: 10.11591/ijpeds.v12.i1.pp112-
120.
[39] Ladaci S, Loiseau JJ, Charef A. Using
fractional order filter in adaptive control of
noisy plants, International Conference on
Advances in Mechanical Engineering And
Mechanics, ICAMEM 2006, Hammamet,
Tunisia.
[40] Juchem J, Muresan C, De Keyser R, Ionescu
C-M, Robust fractional-order auto-tuning for
highly-coupled MIMO systems, Heliyon, Vol.
5, No. 7, 2019, e02154. DOI:
10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02154.
[41] Charef A, Sun HH, Tsao YY, Onaral B.
Fractal system as represented by singularity
function, IEEE Transactions on automatic
control, Vol. 37, No. 9, 1992, pp. 1465-1470.
DOI: 10.1109/9.159595.
[42] Rothe J, Zevering J, Strohmeier M,
Montenegro S, A Modified Model Reference
Adaptive Controller (M-MRAC) Using an
Updated MIT-Rule for the Altitude of a UAV,
Electronics, Vol. 9, No. 7, 2020, 1104. DOI:
10.3390/electronics9071104.
[43] Gutiérrez RE, Rosário JM, Machado JT,
Fractional Order Calculus: Basic Concepts
and Engineering Applications, Mathematical
Problems in Engineering, 2010, DOI:
10.1155/2010/375858.
[44] Sarkar DU, Prakash T, Singh SN, Fractional
Order PID-PSS Design using Hybrid Deep
Learning Approach for Damping Power
System Oscillations, IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, 2024, 1-13, DOI:
10.1109/TPWRS.2024.3416753.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
- Sihem Djebbri, carried out theinvestigation and
simulation,the implementation of the proposed
controllers, Validation, and Writing the original
draft.
- Samir Ladaci contributed to the
Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology,
Supervision, and Writing - review & editing.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.32
Sihem Djebbri, Samir Ladaci
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
387
Volume 19, 2024