Comparing Methods to Mitigate the Effect of Grid Voltage Sag and
Frequency Variation on the Operation of Variable Speed Drives
MOHAMED IBRAHIM, MAGED N. F. NASHED, MONA N. ESKANDER
Power Electronics and Energy Conversion Department,
Electronics Research Institute,
Joseph Tito St., Huckstep, Qism El-Nozha, Cairo Governorate, Cairo,
EGYPT
Abstract: - In this paper, the effect of unsymmetrical grid voltage sag on the performance of a slip power
recovery drive is studied, and two strategies to mitigate its effects are investigated. The first strategy consists of
three phase parallel RL impedance connected to the rotor circuit. The second strategy consists of three phase
LCL filter connected to the rotor circuit. A PI controller is tuned to test the drive at constant speed. Also, the
effect of grid frequency drop on the drive performance is investigated with the same two protection strategies.
The proposed systems are modeled with Matlab/Simulink and the simulation results are compared. The drive
performance without any protection schemes are compared with its performance with the two proposed
strategies. The compared results include the stator voltage and current, the rotor voltage and current, the DC
link voltage and current, the electric torque, and the rotor speed.
Key-Words: - unsymmetrical voltage sag, three phase LCL filter, PI controller, grid frequency, three phase
parallel RL impedance, protection.
Received: February 12, 2023. Revised: November 29, 2023. Accepted: December 11, 2023. Published: March 1, 2024.
1 Introduction
The quality of electricity is an important issue for
electricity distribution companies and end-users
such as the industrial sector. Low power quality can
disturb the customer's production process, and this,
in turn, leads to loss of revenue. The variable speed
drive (VSD) technology is vastly used in various
industrial applications. The slip power recovery
drive (SPRD) is one of the employed VSDs in
industrial systems. It consists of a wound rotor
induction machine with its rotor circuit connected to
a 3-phase rectifier, a DC link, and a 3-phase inverter
to provide speed and torque control. It employs low
cost converters since the rotor power is a fraction of
stator power. These drives may be subjected to
power quality issues such as symmetrical and
unsymmetrical voltage sag, unrated supply
frequency, and harmonic distortion. Voltage sag
causes a high current peak, high torque peak at the
point of voltage recovery, and speed loss during the
sag. In addition, unsymmetrical voltage sag results
in increased losses, and therefore a rise in
temperature, a decrease in the motor's efficiency,
and a decrease in the lifetime of insulation, [1]
Several proposals for mitigating the effects of
voltage sag on the performance of VSD have been
proposed in the literature. Kinetic energy recovery
[2], increasing the DC bus capacitor size [3], adding
a boost converter [4], applying series dynamic
braking resistors [5], and applying different Flexible
AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices are
examples of these proposals, [6], [7], [8], [9].
Another power quality problem is the decrease
in supply frequency which causes a decrease in the
speed of the rotating field on the stator, affecting the
efficiency of the SPRD. Also, since the stator of the
SPRD is directly connected to the grid without an
electronic device, it is very sensitive to supply
frequency deviation. The influence of supply
frequency variation on the performance of induction
motor drives was studied without giving specific
solutions for such problems, [10], [11].
In this paper, the effect of unsymmetrical grid
voltage sag on the performance of the drive is
studied, and two strategies to mitigate their effects
are investigated. The first strategy consists of three
phase parallel RL impedance connected to the rotor
circuit. The second strategy consists of three phase
LCL filter connected to the rotor circuit. A PI
controller is tuned to test the drive at constant speed.
The proposed systems are modeled with
Matlab/Simulink and the simulation results are
compared. The performance without any protection
results are compared with the results of the two
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.2
Mohamed Ibrahim, Maged N. F. Nashed,
Mona N. Eskander
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
11
Volume 19, 2024
proposed strategies. The compared results include
the stator voltage and current, the rotor voltage and
current, the DC link voltage and current, the electric
torque, and the rotor speed. The decrease in
transients at the starting and end of the symmetrical
and unsymmetrical voltage sag in currents, voltages,
and electric torque are noticed with better
performance when using the LCL filter. Also, the
effect of grid frequency drop on the drive
performance is investigated with the same two
protection strategies. The compared results include
the stator voltage and current, the rotor voltage and
current, the DC link voltage and current, the electric
torque, and the rotor speed.
The paper’s contributions are summarized as
follows:
1. Investigating simple techniques for fault-ride-
through of slip energy recovery drives during
symmetrical and unsymmetrical voltage sags.
2. Investigating simple techniques to prevent the
diverse effects of frequency variation on the slip
energy recovery drives.
Hence improving the power quality of the grid-
connected drives can be achieved.
2 System Description
The block diagram of the investigated system is
shown in Figure 1, including the two proposed
protection schemes.
Fig. 1: System block diagram
2.1 Induction Machine Equations
The d-q axes equations describing the proposed
system are given as [8];
Vds = RsIds + pds - ω qs (1)
Vqs = RsIqs + pqs + ω ds (2)
Vdr = Rr Idr + pdr - ωrqr (3)
Vqr = RrIqr + pqr - ωrdr (4)
ds = LsIds + MIdr (5)
qs = Ls Iqs + M Iqr (6)
dr = Lr Idr + M Ids (7)
qr = Lr Iqr + M Iqs (8)
Electromagnetic torque equation:
Te = 1.5 P M (qs Idrds Iqr)/ Ls (9)
Where, sufixes s and r stand for stator and rotor
parameters respectively, V is the voltage, I is the
current, is the flux, M is the mutual inductance, L
is the self-inductance, R is the resistance per phase,
ω is the synchronous speed, P number of pole pairs,
and "p" is the d/dt operator.
2.2 Rectifier
The three phase rectifier connected to the rotor
circuit consists of 6 diodes. It is described by:

 
(10)
Where Vpeak is the rotor circuit voltage per phase.
2.3 The Three Phase Inverter
A three phase IGBT inverter is applied to change
the DC rectifier voltage to a 60 Hz AC voltage fed
back to the grid. It is controlled by a conventional PI
controller.
2.4 Three Phase Dynamic Rotor Impedance
It is applied during voltage sag only via bypass
switches, decreasing the rotor fault current and the
torque oscillations.
2.5 The LCL filter
LCL filters are specially designed to reduce the
harmonics of current absorbed by faults or power
converters, which can be useful in reducing the
effect of voltage sags. Mainly, they are made of a
parallel-series combination of reactors and
capacitors adapted to reduce the current harmonics.
In this paper, it is connected to the rotor circuit.
3 Simulation Results for Un-
Symmetrical Voltage Sag
A single phase unsymmetrical voltage sag (phase A
drops voltage drops from 460 t0 250 V) is assumed
for 0.2 seconds from (0.5- 0.7 sec.). The system is
modeled and simulated using Matlab/Simulink for
the three cases; namely, the SPRD without any
protection devices, the SPRD with the rotor circuit
added dynamic impedance, and the SPRD with the
LCL filter.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.2
Mohamed Ibrahim, Maged N. F. Nashed,
Mona N. Eskander
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
12
Volume 19, 2024
3.1 SPRD Without any Protection Devices
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the stator voltage and
current, the rotor voltage and current the DC link
voltage and current, the electric torque, and the rotor
speed, during voltage sag without protection
devices. The produced high current and voltage
peaks, and the torque oscillations can cause damage
to the machine and the power electronic devices.
Fig. 2: stator voltage and current, rotor voltage and
current during unsymmetrical voltage sag without
any protection devices
3.2 SPRD with Rotor Impedance and Un-
Symmetrical Voltage Sag
A 3-phase parallel RL impedance is connected to
the rotor circuit to damp the effect of unsymmetrical
voltage sag on the SPRD performance. The
magnitude of the stator current during the voltage
sag, shown in Figure 4, decreased to half of its value
compared to the case without any protection, while
the stator voltage profile was not affected. Also, a
decrease in the transient rotor voltage and current
peaks due to the unsymmetrical sag is obvious when
compared to their magnitude without protection
devices. The spike in Figure 4 is due to the sudden
change in grid voltage at the beginning of the
unsymmetrical fault. It takes a very short time,
hence it does not cause damage to the rotor circuit.
Fig. 3: DC voltage and current, the electric torque,
and the rotor speed during unsymmetrical voltage
sag without any protection devices
Fig. 4: Stator voltage and current, rotor voltage and
current during unsymmetrical voltage sag with rotor
impedance
Figure 5 shows a large drop in the magnitude of
the DC link peak voltage and current during the
voltage sag with fast recovery to their normal values
as the sag ends. Also, lower ripples are noticed
when compared to the case without a protection
scheme. However, ripples are noticed in the electric
torque profile due to the voltage sag but with
smaller magnitudes than the case without the added
RL impedance, while the drop in the rotor speed is
minimized.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.2
Mohamed Ibrahim, Maged N. F. Nashed,
Mona N. Eskander
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
13
Volume 19, 2024
Fig. 5: DC voltage and current, electric torque, and
rotor speed during voltage sag with rotor impedance
3.3 SPRD with Rotor LCL and
Unsymmetrical Voltage Sag
A 3-phase LCL impedance is connected to the rotor
circuit to damp the effect of unsymmetrical voltage
sag on the SPRD performance. Results are shown in
Figure 6 and Figure 7. The magnitude of the stator
current during the voltage sag, shown in Figure 6,
decreased as compared to its value without rotor
LCL protection, but with a higher value when
compared to rotor RL protection scheme. The stator
voltage profile is not affected. Also, a decrease in
the transient rotor voltage and current peaks due to
the unsymmetrical sag is obvious when compared to
their magnitude without protection devices.
However, the rotor voltage and current during sag
are higher when compared to the rotor RL
protection scheme. The high frequency content in
Figure 6 means that the system with an LCL filter
needs a longer time to settle, which gives superiority
to the rotor RL damping scheme. Figure 7 shows a
large drop in the magnitude of the DC link peak
voltage and current during the voltage sag with fast
recovery to their normal values as the sag ends.
Also, lower ripples are noticed when compared to
the case without a protection scheme. Concerning
the electric torque, ripples are higher than the case
with the added RL impedance, while the rotor speed
variation during the voltage sag is minimized. It is
noticed that the DC voltage and current profiles as
well as the electric torque during the voltage sag are
similar to their profile when using the RL
impedance, while the stator current and the rotor
voltage and current are much better.
Fig. 6: Stator and rotor voltage and currents with
LCL filter during unsymmetrical voltage sag
Fig. 7: DC voltage and current, electric torque, and
rotor speed during voltage sag with rotor LCL filter
4 Effect of Supply Frequency Drop
on the SPRD Parameters
Since the stator of the SPRD is directly connected to
the grid without an electronic device, it is very
sensitive to supply frequency deviation. A drop in
the supply frequency from 60Hz to 50 Hz is
assumed from 0.5-0.7 sec, and the effect of the
proposed protection on the SPRD performance is
studied.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.2
Mohamed Ibrahim, Maged N. F. Nashed,
Mona N. Eskander
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
14
Volume 19, 2024
4.1 SPRD during Supply Frequency Drop
without Protection
Figure 8 and Figure 9 display the stator voltage and
current, the rotor voltage and current, the DC
voltage and current, the electric torque, and the rotor
speed of the SPRD when the supply frequency
dropped from 60 to 50 Hz from 0.5sec to 0.7 sec
without protection scheme. It is noticed that the
frequency drop drastically affects the performance
of the SPRD.
Fig. 8: stator voltage and current, rotor voltage and
current due to frequency drop without any
protection
Fig. 9: DC link voltage and current, electric torque
and speed during grid frequency drop without
protection device
4.2 SPRD during Supply Frequency Drop
with Rotor RL Protection
Figure 10 and Figure 11 display the stator voltage
and current, the rotor voltage and current, the DC
voltage and current, the electric torque, and the rotor
speed of the SPRD when the supply frequency
dropped from 60 to 50 Hz from 0.5sec to 0.7 sec
with rotor RL protection. A drop in the stator
current transient during the fault is obvious. The
transient dropped from 40 amps without RL
impedance to approximately 20 amps. A small
decrease in the rotor voltage transient during the
fault took place, while a large decrease in the rotor
current transient is obvious. This behavior is due to
the added rotor inductance.
Figure 11 reveals the effect of the protection
scheme in decreasing the DC voltage and current
transients that occurred due to the frequency drop,
from 65 to 23 Volt. and from 35 Amp. without any
protection to 13 V with RL impedance.
Consequently, a large drop in the electric torque
transients is obvious, dropping from more than 150
Nm to 24 Nm, which is nearly its steady state value.
In addition, minimum ripples took place in the rotor
speed during the fault compared to the large speed
drop resulting from the frequency drop without
protection RL scheme.
Fig. 10: Stator and rotor voltages and currents
during frequency drop with added rotor RL
impedance
4.3 SPRD during Supply Frequency Drop
with Rotor LCL Protection
Figure 12 and Figure 13 display the stator voltage
and current, the rotor voltage and current, the DC
voltage and current, the electric torque, and the rotor
speed of the SPRD when the supply frequency
dropped from 60 to 50 Hz from 0.5sec to 0.7 sec
with rotor LCL protection. The stator current
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.2
Mohamed Ibrahim, Maged N. F. Nashed,
Mona N. Eskander
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
15
Volume 19, 2024
transient during the frequency drop slightly
decreased when compared to its value without
protection. Similarly, a small decrease in the rotor
current transients occurred, while the rotor voltage
transients are still large. The DC link voltage and
current, the electric torque, and the rotor speed
shown in Figure 12, improved as compared to the
case without any protection. However, these
transients are higher when compared to the added
RL impedance.
Fig. 11: DC voltages and currents, electric torque,
and speed during frequency drop with added rotor
RL impedance
Fig. 12: Stator and rotor voltages and currents
during frequency drop with added rotor LCL filter
Fig. 13: DC voltages and currents, electric torque,
and speed during frequency drop with added rotor
LCL filter
5 Conclusion
In this paper, the effect of unsymmetrical grid
voltage sag on the performance of a slip power
recovery drive (SPRD) is studied, and two strategies
to mitigate its effects are investigated. The first
strategy consists of a phase parallel RL impedance
connected to the rotor circuit. The second strategy
consists of three phase LCL filter connected to the
rotor circuit. A PI controller is tuned to test the drive
at constant speed. Also, the effect of grid frequency
drop on the drive performance is investigated with
the same two protection strategies. The proposed
systems are modeled with Matlab/ Simulink and the
simulation results are given. The drive stator voltage
and current, rotor voltage and current, DC link
voltage and current, electric torque, and the rotor
speed are calculated and their values are compared
for three cases, namely, without any protection
scheme, with the rotor added RL impedance, and
with the added LCL filter. It is concluded that the
added rotor RL impedance decreased the transients
that took place due to the unsymmetrical voltage sag
and those due to the frequency drop, drastically
while a moderate decrease in these transients
resulted when connecting the rotor LCL filter.
References:
[1] S. Ram, O. P. Rahi, and V. Sharmam, "A
comprehensive literature review on slip power
recovery drives", Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, Vol. 73, June 2017, pp: 922
934,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.2
Mohamed Ibrahim, Maged N. F. Nashed,
Mona N. Eskander
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
16
Volume 19, 2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.154.
[2] D. P. Panda, E. L. Benedict, G.
Venkataramanan, and T. A. Lipo, "A novel
control strategy for the rotor side control of a
doubly-fed induction machine", IEEE
Conference 36th Annual meeting of Industry
Applications, 30 Sept.-4 Oct. 2001, Chicago,
USA, pp: 1695–1702,
https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2001.955761.
[3] Alejandro Rolána, Joaquín Pedrab, and Felipe
Córcolesb, “Detailed study of DFIG-based
wind turbines to overcome the most severe
grid faults” Electrical Power and Energy
Systems (JEPE), Vol. 62, 2014. pp 868-878,
doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.05.031
[4] M. N. F. Nashed, A. M. Sharaf and M.
Eskander, "Fuzzy Logic Fault Ride-Through
Scheme for Electric Vehicles Using PMSM
AC Drives" International Journal on
Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Vol.
12, No 1, March 2020.
[5] K. Pietilainen, Voltage sag ride through AC
Drives: Control and Analysis, Final Thesis,
KTH, Royal Institute of Technology,
Stockholm, 2005.
[6] M. Sharanya, B. Basavaraja, and M. Sasikala,
"An Overview of Dynamic Voltage Restorer
for Voltage Profile Improvement",
International Journal of Engineering and
Advanced Technology (IJEAT), Vol. 2, No. 2,
Dec. 2012.
[7] R. Omar, N.A. Rahim, and M. Sulaiman,
“New control technique applied in dynamic
voltage restorer for voltage sag mitigation”,
American Journal of Engineering and Applied
Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2010, pp: 42-48.
[8] P. Jayanthi, and D. Devaraj, “Enhancement of
LVRT Capability in Grid Connected Wind
Energy Systems using Crowbar 2019 IEEE
International Conference on Clean Energy
and Energy Efficient Electronics Circuit for
Sustainable Development (INCCES), 1 Dec.
2019,
https://doi.org/10.1109/INCCES47820.2019.9
167746.
[9] S. Shi, J. Xiao, S. Liu, L. Tu, Q. Cao, Y.
Liang, G. Zhang, and C. Mao, "A Scheme of
Dynamic Voltage Restorer to Improve Power
Quality in Large Scale Industrial Enterprises",
Journal of Power and Energy Engineering,
Vol. 4, No. 2, Feb. 2016, pp: 19-26.
[10] S. Rachev, L. Dimitrov, and D. Koeva, "Study
of the Influence of Supply Voltage on the
Dynamic Behavior of Induction Motor Low
Voltage Drive", International Scientific
Journal Machines. Technologies. Materials,
Vol. 11, No. 5, 2017, pp. 206-209.
[11] E. El-Kharashi, J. G. Massoud, and M. A. Al-
Ahmar, "The impact of the unbalance in both
the voltage and the frequency on the
performance of single and cascaded IM",
Energy, Vol. 181, August 2019, pp561-576,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.169.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2024.19.2
Mohamed Ibrahim, Maged N. F. Nashed,
Mona N. Eskander
E-ISSN: 2224-350X
17
Volume 19, 2024