
Fig.9: Main Input -output performances of the
proposed system
4 Conclusion
The proposed new approach presents a simple
and fast-responding method to determine the MPP
voltage and power at continuous changes in
irradiation and temperature, while till now, proposed
MPPT methods did not take into consideration the
continuous change in temperature during irradiation
changes.
Furthermore, applying such an approach reduces
the voltage stresses and oscillations across the
chopper elements, leading to better efficiency and
voltage stability.
The proposed approach used the PV key
specification provided by the panel’s manufacturer
at different irradiation rates, where a continuous
power function was derived for MPP points without
running any kind of iteration procedure.
The proposed model validation was verified based
on the real measured data for solar irradiation and
panel temperature.
For future research, a hardware prototype model
should be built and experimentally implemented in
order to practically validate the discussed analytical
and simulation results. This should be the main
objective of the upcoming article.
References:
[1] Martin, S. S., Chebak, A., Barka, N.,
Development of renewable energy laboratory
based on integration of wind, solar and
biodiesel energies through a virtual and
physical environment, 2015, 3rd International
Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Conference, Marrakech, 2015, pp. 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1109/irsec.2015.7455086.
[2] Mahmoud, Y., Xiao, W., Zeineldin, H. H., A
simple approach to modeling and simulation of
photovoltaic modules, IEEE Trans. Sustain.
Energy, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 185–186.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2011.2170776.
[3] Mastromauro, R. A., Liserre, M., Dell’Aquila,
A., Control issues in single-stage photovoltaic
systems: MPPT, current and voltage control,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 8, no. 2, May.
2012, pp. 241– 254.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2012.2186973.
[4] Khader, S., Daud, A.K., Boost chopper
behaviors in Solar photovoltaic system, Smart
Grid and Renewable Energy , Vol.12, No.3,
March 2021,
https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2021.123003.
[5] Boonraksa P., Chaisa-Ard T., et.al ,” Design
and Simulation of Fuzzy logic controller based
MPPT of PV module using MATLAB/
Simulink”, IEEE Xplore: 9 March 2022,
https://doi/ 10.1109/iEECON53204.2022.9741
641.
[6] Ammaiyappan, B. S., Seyezhai, R.,
Comparative analysis of Maximum Power
Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic
Applications, WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on
POWER SYSTEMS, Volume 15, 2020, pp 161-
171, DOI: 10.37394/232016.2020.15.20
[7] Hasan J., Ferjana S., Chowdhury S., “
Investigation of Power Performance of a PV
Module with Boost Converter Using MATLAB
Simulation”, American International Journal
of Sciences and Engineering Research, pp.1-
13, June,29, 2021,
https://doi.org/10.46545/aijser.v4i1.322
[8] Daud, A.K., Khader. S.H., Closed Loop
Modified SEPIC Converter for Photovoltaic
System, WSEAS Transaction on Circuits and
Systems, Volume 21, pp161-167, 2022,
.https://doi.org/ 10.37394/23201.2022.21.17
[9] Daud, A.K.; Khader, S.:” Comparison Analysis
between Various Boost Chopper
Configurations”, International Journal of
Circuits and Electronics, Volume 7, February
2022, Pages: 1-12, ISSN: 2367-8879,
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/
8541
[10] LG Datasheet, LG450N2W-E6,
http://www.solardesigntool.com/components/m
odule-panel-solar/LG/ 6763/LG450N2W-
E6/specification-data-sheet.html
[11] MATLAB and Simulink (2016) The
MathWorks, Inc., version R2016b
.http://www.mathworks.com
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on POWER SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/232016.2023.18.16
Abdel-Karim Daud, Sameer Khader