Abstract: In this work, we introduce a topology Ttot
G, called the total graphic topology, for the vertices
set of a directed graph G= (V, E). We prove many properties of this topology and we give some open
sets and some closed ones. We prove that Ttot
Gis an Alexandro topology. In addition, we investigate
functions between directed graphs, the connectedness of this topology for some strongly connected graphs
and we give an example for each case.
Key-Words: Directed graph, topology, minimal bases, connected components, homeomorphism.
Received: April 14, 2023. Revised: February 19, 2023. Accepted: March 14, 2024. Published: April 22, 2024.
1 Introduction
Graph theory attires attention sice the resolving
of the problem of the Königsberg seven bridges,
[1]. It becomes one of discrete mathematics struc-
tures.
Graphs are simple to understand and can be used
for representing many of mathematical combina-
tions. Today, graph theory becomes a fundamen-
tal mathematical tool for many domains as chem-
istry, marketing and computers network. If we add
topology to the graph, we can use them to solve
economic and the track ow problems, [2], [3],
[4], as in medical application and blood circula-
tion, [5], [6], [7], [8].
A topology is called an Alexandro topology if any
intersection of open sets is also an open set, [9],
[10]. Such topology is very interesting because we
have a minimal bases and the characteristic prop-
erties can be studied by using this minimal bases
or its subbases.
In, [11], the graphic topology for undirected graph
was introduced on the vertices set. After that
many topologies are introduced on undirected
graphs.
In, [12], the authors investigated the graphic
topology and solved partially an open problem
mentioned in, [11]. After that, in 2023 the Z-
graphic topology was introduced in order to an-
swer the rst open problem in, [11], and bypass
it, see, [13]. Graphic topology was also dened on
fuzzy graphs in, [14].
For directed graphs in, [15], two topologies on the
edges set are given. In this paper, we consider
directed graph and introduce the total graphic
topology on the vertices set.
This work has ve sections in addition to the in-
troduction and conclusion. Section 2 is devoted to
some useful preliminaries in directed graph theory
and topology. We give a set of subset of the ver-
tices set Vof a directed graph G= (V, E)which
is will be the subbases of our graphic topology. In
section 3, we prove a lot of typical and preliminary
results as proving that the total graphic topol-
ogy is an Alexandro topology, we prove some
characterizations of minimal open sets. Section
4 is devoted to some advantaged results and we
give some examples of open and closed sets. In
Section 5, we study functions between digraphs
and their relation with continuous and homeomor-
phism maps. The last section is devoted to total
graphic topology and connectedness.
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we will recall some denitions and
properties of directed graph theory and topology,
[16], [17], [18]. Then, we introduce a new topology
for the graph which will be have the total graphic
topology as name.
Denition 2.1 A directed graph G= (V, E)is a
pair of sets: a nonempty set Vand a set Esuch
Total Graphic Topology on the Vertex Sets of Directed Graphs
HANAN OMAR ZOMAM
Department of Mathematics
College of Science Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah
Taibah University
SAUDI ARABIA.
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science
Shendi University
SUDAN.
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
18
Volume 4, 2024
that EV×V. More precisely, if e= (x, y)E,
ehas a direction from xto y. We also say eis an
edge from xto y.
A directed graph G= (V, E)is called simple if
xV, (x, x) /Eand x, y Vthere is no
multiple edges from xto y.
Denition 2.2 A digraph G= (V, E)is called
complete if it is simple and for any distinct x, y
V, there exist a unique edge from xto yand a
unique edge from yto x.
Denition 2.3 Let G= (V, E)be a digraph. G
is called an oriented graph if at most one of the
two edges (x, y)and (y, x)is in E, for all xand y
vertices of G.
If Gis a simple graph and (x, y)Eif and only
if (y, x) /E, for all x, y V, we call Gis a
tournament.
Denition 2.4 Let G= (V, E)be a simple di-
graph. The digraph G= (V, E)dened by
(x, y)Eif and only if (x, y) /Eis called the
complement of G.
Denition 2.5 Consider a directed graph G=
(V, E).
In G, a directed path Pfrom a0to anis a sequence
of the form P:a0, e0, a1, e1,· · · , an1, en1, an,
where akVand ekan edge from akto ak+1,
k= 0,· · · , n 1.
We say that aand bare connected in Gif there
is a directed path from ato band a directed path
from bto a. Also, Gis called strongly connected
if any two distinct vertices are connected in G.
Let xa vertex of a simple directed graph G=
(V, E). We dene the out-neighborhood set of x
as
KHx={yV, (x, y)E}.(1)
and the int-neighborhood set of xas
Dx={yV, (y, x)E}.(2)
It is clear from (1) and (2) that
y KHxif and only if x Dy.
Let
Mx=KHx Dx.(3)
The cardinal of the out-neighborhood KHxof xis
called the out-degree of x, we denote
d+(x) = card(KHx),(4)
the cardinal of int-neighborhood Dxof xis named
int-degree of the vertex xand we set
d(x) = card(Dx)(5)
Figure 1: A directed graph G= (V, E)
and we donate
dt(x) = card(Mx)(6)
the total degree of the vertex x.
We set the minimum out-degree, the minimum int-
degree and the minimum total degree of a digraph
G= (V, E)as
δ+(G) = min{d+(x), x V},(7)
δ(G) = min{d(x), x V}(8)
and
δt(G) = min{dt(x), x V}(9)
However, the maximum out-degree, the maximum
int-degree and the maximum total degree of Gare
respectively given by
+(G) = max{d+(x), x V},(10)
(G) = max{d(x), x V}(11)
and
t(G) = max{dt(x), x V}.(12)
Example 2.1 For the graph Ggiven by Fig. 1, we
have Ma={b, c, d},Mb={a, c},Mc={a, b}
and Md={a}.
Denition 2.6 Suppose that G= (V, E)is a di-
graph. A vertex xVis called isolated if
Mx=.
Denition 2.7 Let G= (V, E)be a digraph. We
say that Gis locally nite if Mxis a nite set for
all xV.
It is clear that a nite digraph is locally nite one.
We pass to give some denitions and notations for
topological spaces that we will need them later.
Denition 2.8 Let Vbe a non empty set and let
τbe a family of subsets of V. If the following
conditions
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
19
Volume 4, 2024
(1) , V τ;
(2) U1, U2τ, we have U1U2τ;
(3) {Ui}iIa family of elements in τ, the union
iIUiτ
are satised, we say τis a topology for Vor (V, τ )
is a topological space.
An element of τis named an open set of V.
Denition 2.9 Suppose that (V, τ )is a topological
space and UV.
(i) The set Uc=V\Uis called the complement
of Uin V.
(ii) The set Uis called a closed set of Vif and
only if Ucis an open set.
(iii) We denote Uthe smallest closed set of Vcon-
taining U.Uis called the closure of Uin V.
Next, suppose that the digraph G= (V, E)is sim-
ple and without isolated vertices. Consider the set
Stot
G={Mx;xV},(13)
where Mxis given by (3).
Theorem 2.1 Let G= (V, E)be a simple directed
graph without isolated point. Then, Stot
Gis a sub-
bases for a topology of the vertices set V.
Proof. Since SxVMxV, we have to prove
that VSxVMx.
Let zV, Since Mz6=, there exists x Mz.
So, z Mxand we get the result.
2
The topology induced by the subbases Stot
Gis
called the total graphic topology of Gand it is
denoted Ttot
G.
Example 2.2 For the graph in the Example 2.1,
we have Stot
G=n,{b, c, d},{a, c},{a, b},{a}o,
B=n{a},{b},{c},{a, b},{a, c},{b, c, d}oand
Ttot
G=n,{a},{b},{c},{a, b},{a, c},{b, c},
{a, b, c},{b, c, d},{a, b, c, d}o.
Throughout this paper, a digraph means a simple
locally nite digraph without isolated vertex.
3 Preliminary Results
An Alexandro space is a topological space sat-
isfying any intersection of open sets is an open
set. With an Alexandro space and so Alexandro
topology we have a minimal bases of the topology
and we can use it to study the properties of the
topological space as we will do in the rest of this
paper.
Theorem 3.1 suppose that G= (V, E)is a di-
rected graph. Then (V, Ttot
G)is an Alexandro
space.
Proof. The total graphic topology Ttot
Gis con-
structed from the subbases Stot
G, so it is sucient
to prove that any intersection of elements in the
subbases is an open set.
Consider xAMx, where AV, and suppose
that \
xA
Mx6=.
Suppose that y xAMx. Then, y Mx, for
all xA.
We get for all xA,x My. Therefore
this means A Mxand so Ais nite. Hence
xAMxis an open set.
As consequence of the above theorem, Let G
be a digraph, then the total graphic topology Ttot
G
of a directed graph G= (V, E)has a minimal
basis which we denote
BG={Mx;xV},(14)
where Mxis the intersection of all open sets con-
taining x, it is the smallest open set containing the
vertex x. We can characterise the smallest open
sets by using the subbases as follows.
Theorem 3.2 Suppose that G= (V, E)is a di-
graph and xis a vertex of G. Then,
Mx=\
z∈Mx
Mz.(15)
Proof. Since xis a vertex of G,Mxis a nonempty
set. Consider z Mx, then x Mzand so the
open set z∈MxMzcontains xand so
Mx\
z∈Mx
Mz.
Conversely, since Ttot
Ghas Stot
Gas subbases there
exists AVsuch that Mx=zAMz.
For all zA,x Mz. Therefore, for all zA,
z Mx. Then, A Mxand so,
\
z∈Mx
Mz\
zA
Mz=Mx.
2
Remark 3.1 For a directed G= (V, E), each min-
imal open set Mxis a nite set since each set Mz
is nite et
Mx=\
z∈Mx
Mz.
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
20
Volume 4, 2024
Corollary 3.1 Let Gbe a digraph and let xand a
two distinct vertices of G.
(i) If Mx={a}, then Mx=Ma.
(ii) If a Mx, then Mx Ma.
(iii) If Ma Mx, then Mx Ma.
Proof.
(i) If Mx={a}, from the fact that Mx=
z∈MxMzwe get Mx== Ma.
(ii) From the last theorem, Mx=z∈MxMz, so
Mx Mzfor all z Mx. In particular,
Mx Ma.
(iii) When Ma Mx, we have aMa Mx.
The result follows From (ii).
The following result follows from the Theorem 3.2,
but it very useful when dealing with the minimal
bases.
Theorem 3.3 When G= (V, E)is a digraph and
aa vertex of G. Then,
Ma={xV;Ma Mx}.
Proof. We have
Ma=\
z∈Ma
Mz,
so we have xMaif and only if x Mz,z Ma
which is equivalent to for all z Ma,z Mxand
this is true if and only if Ma Mx.
Corollary 3.2 Suppose that Gis a digraph and let
abe a vertex of G. Then, Ma Ma=. Also, if
Mx Ma, we have MxMa=.
Proof. (i)By contradiction, suppose that there
exists yMa Ma.
yMagives Ma Myfrom Theorem 3.3.
y Maimplies y My, contradiction since Gis
a simple directed graph.
(ii)If Mx Ma, then MxMa MxMa=.
Theorem 3.4 For any vertex ain a directed graph
G= (V, E), we have
{a}={xV;Mx Ma}.
Proof. x {a}if and only if A {x} 6=, for
all open set Acontaining x. Using minimal bases,
this is equivalent to Mx {a} 6=, this means
aMx. That is, by Theorem3.3
x {a} Mx Ma.
4 Some Properties of Graphic
Topology
Theorem 4.1 For a directed graph G= (V, E, the
space (V, Ttot
G)is a compact topological space if
and only if the vertices set Vis nite.
Proof. Recall that the topological space (V, Ttot
G)
is said compact if every open cover of the space
VSxVUxhas a nite subcover.
If Vis a nite set, then from any open cover of
V, we have a nite subcover by denition of the
compactness.
Conversely, suppose that (V, Ttot
G)is a compact
topological space. Consider the minimal basis BG.
The family BGis an open cover of V, so there
exists a nite subcover of BG. Since it is minimal
as basis, BGis equal to this subcover. Since from
(14), we have
BG={Mx;xV},
we conclude that Vis nite.
Proposition 4.1 Let G= (V, E)be a digraph.
Then, A={xV, dt(x)=∆t(G)}is an open
set for the total graphic topology of G.
Proof. Let xA. We will prove that MxA.
Let yMx, we have Mx My(from Theorem
3.3). We obtain
card(Mx)card(My)t(G).
Then dt(x) = t(G) = dt(y)and hence yA.
We get xMxA, for all xAand the result
is proved.
Proposition 4.2 Let G= (V, E)be a digraph.
Then the following set
B={xV, dt(x) = δt(G)}(16)
is a closed set for the total graphic topology of G.
Proof. We have BB. We will prove the inverse
inclusion.
Let xB, since Mxis an open set containing x,
we have MxB6=.
Set zMxB, we obtain the two facts:
Mx Mzand dt(z) = δt(G).
So,
card(Mx)card(Mz) = δt(G).
Therefore dt(x) = δt(G)and we get xB.
Proposition 4.3 Suppose that G= (V, E)is a -
nite directed graph. Then the following set
Tc
G={A;Ac T tot
G}(17)
is a topology for Vand if Gis an oriented graph
such that Ttot
G=Tc
G, then Ttot
Gis the discrete
topology.
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
21
Volume 4, 2024
Proof. We have , V τsince their complements
are in Ttot
G.
When Aand Bare in Tc
G, we have (AB)c=
AcBcand so (AB)c T tot
G. Hence AB T c
G.
Now, if we have a countable family {Ai}of ele-
ments of Tc
G, we know that
(iAi)c=iAc
i.
But Ttot
Gis an Alexandro topology, we deduce
that iAi T c
G.
Then Tc
Gis a topology for V.
Next, suppose that Gis an oriented graph
and Ttot
G=Tc
G. Let xV, we have Mx {x}c
as the set of all vertices adjacent to xin G. Then,
Mx {x}c T tot
Gsince it is an element of its
subbases.
Therefore, Mx {x}c T c
Gand so,
Mx {x} T tot
G.
Since Mxis the minimal open set containing x, we
get
Mx Mx {x}.
Since Mx Mx=(Corollary 3.2), we obtain
Mx={x}. We have so Ttot
Gis the discrete topol-
ogy.
5 Isomorphic Digraphs and
Homeomorphic Graphic Topologies
Denition 5.1 Un homomorphism hfrom a di-
graph G= (V, E)to a digraph G0= (V0, E0)is
a function h:VV0satisfying
(x, y)E, (h(x), h(y)) E0.
his called isomorphism if h:VV0is bijective
and (x, y)V2, we have
(x, y)Eif and only if (h(x), h(y)) E0.
We say that the two graphs are isomorphic.
Denition 5.2 An homeomorphism hfrom a topo-
logical space (V, T )to a topological space (V0, T 0)
is a continuous bijective map h:VV0such
that its inverse is also continuous. In this case,
the two spaces or the two topologies are called
homeomorphic.
Our rst result in this section is the following.
Theorem 5.1 Suppose that two directed graphs
G= (V, E)and G0= (V0, E0)are isomorphic and
h:VV0is an isomorphism. Then, their total
graphic topologies are homeomorphic.
Figure 2: These two graphs have the discrete
topology as total graphic topology but they are
not isomorphic.
Proof. It is sucient to prove that for all A Stot
G0,
h1(A)is in Ttot
G. For this, let zV0satisfying
A=Mzand let x=h1(z).
In this case, we get
h1(A) = {aV;h(a) Mz}
={aV; (z, h(a)) E0or (h(a), z)E0}
={aV; (h(x), h(a)) E0or (h(a), h(x)) E0}
={aV; (x, a)Eor (a, x)E}
=Mx T tot
G.
Hence the bijective function h:VV0is
continuous. In a similar way, we prove that h1
is continuous.
For the converse, see Fig. 2. The two graphs
have the the discrete topology as total graphic
topology but they are not isomorphic.
Theorem 5.2 Suppose that G= (V, E)and G=
(V0, E0)are two digraphs and h:VV0is a
function. Then, his continuous if and only if
y, z V, My Mz= Mh(y) Mh(z).
(18)
Proof. If the function his a continuous function
and y, z Vsuch that
My Mz.
In order to get Mh(y) Mh(z), we are going to
prove that h(z)Mh(y)and the result follows
from Theorem 3.3.
Now, consider the minimal open set Mh(y). such
that yh1Mh(y)and Mythe smallest open
set containing y, we get Myh1Vh(y).
As My Mz, we obtain zMyand so
zh1Mh(y), this means, h(z)Mh(y).
For the converse, Suppose that the property
(18) is satised and we have to prove that the
function his continuous. Let Aan open set of V0
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
22
Volume 4, 2024
and consider yh1(A). We have h(y)Aand
so Mh(y)A.
Let zMy, then My Mzfrom The-
orem 3.3. Therefore, Mh(y) Mh(z)and
hence h(z)Mh(y). Or, we have Mh(y)A
then h(z)Aand so zh1(A). We get
Myh1(A), for all yh1(A)and the result
follows.
Theorem 5.3 Suppose that G= (V, E)and G0=
(V0, E0)are two digraphs and h:VV0a func-
tion. Then, h: (V, Ttot
G)(V0,Ttot
G0)is an home-
omorphism if and only if
y, z V, My Mz Mh(y) Mh(z).
(19)
Proof. First, by the Theorem 5.2, we have: h
continuous if and only if
y, z V, My Mz= Mh(y) Mh(z).
Using Theorem 5.2 for the function h1, we get:
h1continuous if and only if
y0, z0V0,My0 Mz0= Mh1(y0) Mh1(z0).
Since his bijective, we get: h1continuous if and
only if
y, z V, Mh(y) Mh(z)= My Mz
and so, the result follows.
6 Graphic Topology and
Connectedness
Being connected, is a property can be dened for a
topological space as for a graph. Here, we will con-
sider the strongly connectivity for directed graph,
[16], [17], [18]. Let us recall the denitions.
Denition 6.1 Let (V, T)be a topological space.
The space Vis said connected if whenever
V=ABsuch that AB=, we have necessary
A=or B=. That is, Vcan not written as
the union of two disjoint proper open sets.
Denition 6.2 Let G= (V, E)be a digraph. Gis
called strongly connected if for all a, b Vthere
exist at least two paths joining aand b: one from
ato band one from bto a.
In general, a digraph G= (V, E)does not have
to be strongly connected, so we can dene their
connected components.
Denition 6.3 Suppose that G= (V, E)is a di-
graph. Let U1, U2,· · · be subsets of Vsuch that
Figure 3: This is a non strongly connected digraph
but its total graphic topology is connected.
(i) V=iUi;
(ii) UiUj=, for all i6=j;
(iii) For i= 1,2,· · · , for all a, b Ui, there exist a
path from ato band a path from bto a.
(iv) For all aUi,bUjand i6=j, if there exists
a path from ato b, then there is no path from
bto a.
Then, each subset Uiis called connected compo-
nent of the digraph G.
It is clear that a strongly connected digraph has
one connected component. and a nite digraph
has a nite connected components. When the
graph is undirected and disconnected, the graphic
topological is disconnected and this is due to the
connected components are open sets [11], but for
directed graph this result no longer true. Our rst
example is a proof for this fact.
Example 6.1 For the digraph given by Fig. 3,
we have: Mx={x0, y, z},My={y0, x, z},Mz=
{z0, x, y},Mx0={x},My0={y},Mz0={z}
Mx={x0}, My={y0}, Mz={z0},Mx0=
{x0, y, z}, My0={y0, x, z}, Mz0={z0, x, y}.
Example 6.2 The digraph given by Fig. 4 is a
non strongly connected digraph with disconnected
total graphic topology.
Example 6.3 The digraph, given by Fig. 5, is
strongly connected and its connected total graphic
topology.
Example 6.4 In the Fig. 6, the graph is non
strongly connected digraph and its total graphic
topology is disconnected.
In the rest of this paper, we prove some elementary
results about connectedness of the total graphic
topology.
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
23
Volume 4, 2024
Figure 4: An example of digraph which is not
strongly connected and its total graphic topology
is disconnected.
Figure 5: This is a strongly connected digraph
with strongly connected total graphic topology.
Figure 6: This is an example of a non strongly con-
nected digraph with a disconnected total graphic
topology.
Theorem 6.1 Let G= (V, E)be a bipartite di-
graph. The total graphic topology Ttot
Gof Gis a
disconnected topology.
Proof. Gis a bipartite graph means there exist
two disjoint subsets B1and B2of Vsuch that
V=B1B2and if (x, y)Eand (x, y) /B1×B2
then (x, y)B2×B1.
Consider
U1=[
xB1
Mxand U2=[
xB2
Mx.
then, U1and U2are nonempty disjoint open
sets of Vsatisfying U1B2,U2B1and
V=U1U2. So, (V, Ttot
G)is a disconnected
topological space.
In fact, the last proof conrms the following
result.
Theorem 6.2 Let G= (V, E)be a strongly con-
nected bipartite digraph. The total graphic topol-
ogy Ttot
Gof Gis a disconnected topology.
Theorem 6.3 Suppose that G= (V, E)is a nite
one sense directed cycle, that is, V={x1,· · · , xn}
and E={(xj1, xj), i = 2 . . . , n}∪{(xn, x1)}.
The total graphic topology Ttot
Gof Gis a discon-
nected topology.
Proof. For all xiV,i6= 1, we have Mxi=
{xi1}and Mx1={xn}. Then, for all xV,
{x}is an open set and so Ttot
Gis discrete.
7 Conclusion
In this paper, we introduce the total graphic
topology Ttot
Gon the vertices set of a directed
graph G= (V, E)by using a subbases. The
elements of this subbases are the sets of all
neighbors in any direction of all vertices of the
graph. That is, a neighborhood of a vertex is the
set of all out-neighbors and int-neighbors. For
this reason, the obtained topology are called total
graphic topology. We prove that this topology is
an Alexandro topology that is any intersection
of open set is also an open set. The existing of
minimal bases follows. We give some characteri-
zations of minimal open sets using the subbases.
In addition, we investigate the relation between
isomorphic graphs and their graphic total topolo-
gies and prove that they will be homeomorphic.
The problem of connectedness was investigated
through some examples. As future work, we have
the following question: are there some necessary
and sucient conditions for the connectivity of
(V, Ttot
G)?
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
24
Volume 4, 2024
References
[1] J.A. Bondy and U.S.R. Murty, Graph theory,
Springer, Berlin, 2008.
[2] G. Agnarsson and R. Greeniaw, Graph The-
ory: Modeling Application, and Algorithms,
Person Education Inc., (2007).
[3] A. Kandel, H. Bunke and M. Last, Applied
graph theory in computer vision and pattern
recognition, 84-88, Studied in Computational
Intelligence, 52, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg-
Berlin, 2007.
[4] D. Nogly and M. Schladt, Digital topology on
graphs, Comput. Vis. Image. Und. 63 (1996),
pp. 394-396.
[5] A. Gamorez, C.G. Nianga and S. Canoy,
Topologies induced by neighborhoods of a
graph under some binary operations, Eur. J.
Pure Appl. Math., 12 (2019), pp. 749-755.
https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v12i3.3464
[6] A.S. Nawar, A.E.F.A. El Atik, A model of
a human heart via graph nano topological
spaces, Int. J. Biomath., 12 (2019), 1950006.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524519500062
[7] H.A. Othman, M.M. Al-Shamiri, A. Saif,
S. Acharjee, T. Lamoudan and R. Is-
mail, Pathless directed topology in con-
nection to the circulation of blood in the
heart of human body, AIMS Mathemat-
ics, 2022, Volume 7, Issue 10:18158-18172.
https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022999
[8] M. Shokry and R.E. Aly, Topological proper-
ties on graph vs medical application in human
heart, Int. J. Appl. Math., 15 (2013), pp. 1103-
1109.
[9] P. Alexandro , Diskrete Räume, Mat. Sb.
(N.S.) 2 (1937), pp. 501-518.
[10] T. Speer, A short study of Alexandro spaces,
at http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2136, 2007.
[11] S. M. Jafarian Amiri, A. Jafarzadeh and
H. Khatibzadeh, An Alexandro topology on
graphs, Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical
Society Vol. 39 No. 4 (2013), pp. 647-662.
[12] H. O. Zomam, H. A. Othman and
M. Dammak, Alexandro spaces
and graphic topology, Adv. Math.
Sci. J., 10 (2021), pp. 2653-2662.
https://doi.org/10.37418/amsj.10.5.28
[13] H. O. Zomam and M. Dammak, Z-graphic
topology on undirected graph, Kuwait J. Sci.,
Vol.50, No.(2), April.2023, pp. 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.48129/kjs.17541
[14] A.M. Alzubaidi and M. Dammak, Graphic
topology on fuzzy graphs, Advances in Mathe-
matics: Scientic Journal 11 (2022), no.10, pp.
853-868.
[15] K. A. Abdu and A. Kilicman, Topologies on
the edges set of directed graphs, J. Math. Com-
put. Sci., 18 (2018), pp. 232-241.
https://doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2018.814
[16] R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 3rd edition, Grad-
uate Texts in Mathematics, 173, Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, 2005.
[17] D.B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory,
2nd edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle
River, 2001.
[18] J. Dugundji, Topology, Allyn and Bacon,
Inc., Boston, 1966.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The author contributed in the present research, at all
stages from the formulation of the problem to the
final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflict of interest to declare that
is relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
PROOF
DOI: 10.37394/232020.2024.4.3
Hanan Omar Zomam
E-ISSN: 2732-9941
25
Volume 4, 2024