Estimates and Radii of Convexity in Some Classes of Regular Functions
F. F. MAIYER, M. G. TASTANOV, A. A. UTEMISSOVA*, N. M. TEMIRBEKOV,
D. S. KENZHEBEKOVA
Department of Mathematics and Physics,
Kostanay Regional University named after. A. Baitursynuly,
Kostanay,
KAZAKHSTAN
*Corresponding Author
Abstract: - A class
),,,(
aCn
is being introduced regular in the circle
1: zzE
functions
)(zf
, satisfying
the condition
,,|))()1)(1((|/1 Ezaazfzz nn
where
1,2/1,10,0, na
. Class
),,,(
aCn
generalizes various subclasses of close-to-convex functions, including functions which are convex in a certain
direction and functions with limited rotation. Estimates of the derivative and logarithmic derivative of the
function
, , ,
n
f z C a
are found, and also the radii of the convexity of the class
),,,(
aCn
. The case is
also considered when the function
)(zf
has gaps in the expansion in a row. Similar results are formulated for
the class
of functions
)(zF
, satisfying the condition
,,|)/)()1)(1((|/1 EzaazzFzz nn
which
generalizes classes of typically real and close-to-starlike functions. All results are accurate. With the
appropriate selection of parameter values of
, , , , an
both new and previously published results are obtained.
Key-Words: - geometric theory of functions, estimates of regular functions, radii of convexity, close-to-convex
functions, typically real functions, close-to-starlike functions.
1 Introduction
Let
denotes a class of functions
...,)( 2
210 zazccz
regular in the circle
:1E z z
,
)( 0
c
n
function class
)(z
with decomposition
.1...,)( 1
10
nzazccz n
n
n
n
Function class
)(zf
, normalized by the condition
,01)0(')0( ff
with decomposition of the form
12
12 (1)( ) , 1, ,
nn
nn
f z z a z a z n z E


we denote by
,
n
N
and
NN
1
. Let
*0,, SSS
and
K
denote, respectively, the classes of univalent,
convex, starlike and close-to-convex functions
.)( Nzf
Close-to-convex functions are introduced in the
works [1], [2], where it is established that the
function
N)(zf
is a univalent in
E
if and only if
there exists a function
0
)( Szg
such that
()
Re 0, . (2)
()
fz zE
gz




Each function
)(zg
corresponds to its class
g
K
close-to-convex functions
)(zf
, satisfying
condition (2), and
.)( 0
SzgKK g
In this
case, the functions
)(zf
class
g
K
to a certain
extent, they inherit the properties of the function
)(zg
. Of these, classes are often explored
321 ,, FFF
close-to-convex functions
N)(zf
, satisfying the
conditions
)3(,0))()1Re((: 2
1
zfzF
)4(,0))()1Re((: 2
2
zfzF
)5(0))()1Re((:
3
zfzF
or their generalizations, while the classes
21,FF
characterized by an original geometric property of
the area
)(Ef
convexity in the direction of the
Received: September 18, 2023. Revised: April 19, 2024. Accepted: June 19, 2024. Published: July 19, 2024.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
446
Volume 23, 2024
imaginary axis, [3], [4] (for the class
1
F
) and
convexity in the positive direction of the real axis
[5] (for the class
2
F
), what is related to the
simplicity of the geometric properties of convex
functions
,
1
1
ln
2
1
)(
1z
z
zg
,
1
)(
2z
z
zg
)1ln()(
3zzg
,
on the basis of which these classes are built.
Works [3], [4] marked the beginning of a whole
series of studies of the class
1
F
of functions convex
in the direction of the imaginary, as well as various
generalizations of this class. This includes, for
example, articles [6], [7]. In [6], the class
1
F
is
investigated, in [7] class
)(
C
functions
N)(zf
, satisfying the condition
2
Re [ (1 ) ( )] 0,0 1, ,
i
e z f z R

where both the distortion, growth and coverage
theorems and coefficient estimates are investigated.
At
0,1
this condition sets the class
1
F
, and
at
0
a simple parametric transition from the
class
1
F
to the class of functions with limited
rotation, is performed which is set using the
condition
0)]([Re
zfei
and it is well known as a
classic sign of univalentness from [8], [9].
In [10], [11] is introduced a subclass
K)K
(
functions of close-to-convex order
, satisfying the
condition
()
arg 0 1 (6)
( ) 2
f ' z π
γ , g z S , γ ,z E
g' z
which aroused great interest due to such a visual
geometric property as reachability from outside the
area
)(Ef
solution angles
1
. By analogy,
subclasses were also introduced
,)(
1
F
,)(
2
F
)(
3
F
functions satisfying, respectively, the
conditions
,z'farg 2
))()((
2
z-1
2
))()(( π
γz'farg
2
z-1
and
.z'farg 2
))()((
z-1
Almost simultaneously, in articles [12], [13], the
angular reachability of two classes of functions
generalizing classes was investigated
21 FF ,
. At the
same time, in [12] emphasis is placed on obtaining
distortion and growth theorems, as well as finding
the radii of convexity, and in the article [13] the
geometric properties of the domain of values of
functions from the introduced classes are
investigated.
By analogy with condition (2) for the class of
close-to-convex functions, in [14] introduced the
class close-to-starlike functions 󰇛󰇜
satisfying the condition
()
Re 0,
()
Fz
gz
where 󰇛󰇜
. The subclasses of the class are the
classes
of close-to-starlike functions
󰇛󰇜, respectively satisfying the conditions:
2
((1 ) ( ) / ) 0,Re z F z z
2
((1 ) ( )/ ) 0,Re z F z z
((1 ) ( )/ ) 0.Re z F z z
There is a simple relationship between classes
1 2 3
, , F F F
and
* * *
1 2 3
, ,CS CS CS
, which is expressed
by the ratio:
*, 1,2,3
kk
f z C F z zf z CS k
Classes
* * *
1 2 3
, ,CS CS CS
were studied in articles
[15], [16], [17], [18], [19] from the point of view of
estimating the coefficients and finding the radii of
star formation of these classes relative to various
subclasses of the class
*
S
.
Thus, based on the above-described literature
review, the issue of studying the extreme properties
of various
n
N
subclasses remains relevant at
present.
In this paper, a fairly wide class of regular
functions is introduced and in this class, irreducible
distortion theorems and exact convexity radii are
found and also, as a consequence, similar results
are obtained in other subclasses of close-to-convex
functions. In addition, in the class of functions
introduced in the article, exact theorems on
distortions and coverings, as well as starlikeness
radii, generalizing classes of typically real and
close-to-starlike functions, are obtained.
2 Problem Formulation
The purpose of this article is to introduce a
sufficiently wide class of regular functions with
decomposition of the form (1), including the
subclasses of close-to-convex functions listed in the
introduction with obvious geometric properties, in
order to conduct their study from a unified point of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
447
Volume 23, 2024
view. As an application of the main results for
close-to-convex functions, using the ratio
F z zf z
, these results are transferred to
subclasses of close-to-starlike functions,
complementing or generalizing some of the known
results.
Definition. We will assume that the function
)(zf
belongs to the class
,,a,,Cn
,, 0
1 1/2,1,0 na
, if and if
N)(zf
satisfies
the condition
1/
(1 )(1 ) ( ) , (7)
nn
z z f z a a z E

in doing so
1. (8)
11 n




It follows from (7) that
0))()1)(1Re(( /1
zfzz nn
for all
21/a
,
which in terms of dependence of functions can be
written as
γ
nn
z
z
(z)f)zδ)(zλ(
1
1
11
. That is
, , , , , ,
nn
C a C

and the condition is
fulfilled
.,
2
|))()1)(1((arg| Ezzfzz nn
Therefore, the functions
)(zf
from
,,, a
n
C
is univalent and close-to-convex of the order
,
since satisfy condition (6) with convex in
E
function
.
)1)(1(
(z)
0
z
nn δtλt
dt
g
Indeed,
1
() (1 )(1 )
nn
gz zz


and therefore
()
Re Re Re 1
( ) 1 1
11
.
nn
nn
g'' z λnz δnz λn δn
z,
g' z λδ
-λz - δn
zE

Due to condition (8), so
Szg )(
.
We note also that the classes
,)(
1
F
,)(
2
F
)(
3
F
, as well as
)(
C
at
0
, are subclasses of
the class
),,,(
aCn
.
Consider the function
0: f E C
, which is
defined by the formula
0
0
1
111
z
nn
at dt
fz a a t tt




 

where
, , , , an
are fixed real parameters
nN
,
1
, 0, 0 1, , 1
2
an
and the inequality
(8).
Then
1/
((1 )(1 ) ( ))
nn
z z f z w z

,
where
1/
((1 )(1 ) ( ))
nn
z z f z w z

mapping the disk
E
to a disk
: w w a a
.
Therefore,
0()fz
satisfies condition (7). Hence,
0( ) , , ,
n
f z C a
and
, , ,
n
Ca
. This
function will be one of the extremal functions in
Theorems 1 and 2. Other examples of functions
1()fz
and
2()fz
from
, , ,
n
Ca
can be found
in the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2.
The main research method of the article is a
fairly easy-to-use and at the same time effective
method of subordination of regular functions. They
say that the regular function
()z
in
E
is
subordinate to the function
0()z
and write
0
zz
, if there exists a function
, 0 0, 1zz

in
E
such that
0
zz
. In the case of a univalent
function
0
φ ( )z
, the subordination ratio
0
zz
means that
0
EE

and
0
00

, which implies the embedding of
closed regions
0n
z r z r

at
01r
for the function
0
( (0))
n
z

R
.
In the works of many authors, the proof of
various estimates related to the function
()z
is
based directly on the use of the relation
0
zz
using estimates for
z
.
Another approach to obtaining estimates of the
function
()z
is to use the embedding ratio of
closed regions
0n
z r z r

. Hence,
based on the geometric properties of the set
0n
zr
, estimates of the real, imaginary part,
argument and modulus of the function
()z
are
easily derived. Adjacent to this approach is the
finding of estimates
()z
based on the properties
of the inner radius of the region.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
448
Volume 23, 2024
3 Problem Solution
3.1 Distortion Theorem and Radius of
Convexity of Class
,,,
n
Cλ δ a γ
Theorem 1. Let
),,,()(
aCzf n
. Then when
1 rz
there are accurate estimates
(1 ) 1 ()
( 1) (1 )(1 )
(1 ) 1 (9)
( 1) (1 )(1 )
γ
nn
γ
nn
a - r f ' z
a a - r λr δr
ar ,
a a r λr δr


 






( ) (2 1) (10)
( ) (1 )( ( 1) )
11
nn
nn
fz λnz δnz γ a r
z.
f z r a a r
λz δz


Proof. In terms of dependence, condition (7)
means that
0
(1 )
( ) (1 )(1 ) ( ) ( ) (11)
( 1) ,
γ
nn az
zλz δz f' z z a a z





where
)1(
1
)(
aa
za
zw
at
21/a
displays a circle
E
on the circle
.aw-aw:
due to dependence, the
inclusion of areas is performed
)()( 0rzrz
at any
,0 1rr
, that is,
taking into account the type of area
)(
0E
in the
circle
rz
inequalities are fulfilled
(1 ) ()
( 1)
(1 )
(1 )(1 ) '( ) (12)
( 1)
nn
ar z
a a r
ar
z z f z a a r










Due to
0,0
, then when
1 rz
we
have
).1)(1()1)(1()1)(1( nnnnnn rrzzrr
Combining this estimate with the estimate (12),
we come to (9).
To prove the estimate (10), we use lemma 1,
which follows by replacing
()z p z
from the
results from [20] for the class of functions
1
1
( ) 1 , 1, ,
nn
nn
pz с z с z n z E
satisfying
the condition
( ) , 1/ 2p z a a a
.
Lemma 1. If
)(z
from
)1(
n
R
satisfies the
condition
,,10,2/1,))(( /1 Ezaaaz
then when
1 rz
there is an accurate
assessment
(2 1) (13)
(1 )( ( 1) )'
n
nn
'(z) a nr
z(z) r a a r

which is achieved for the function
)()( 0n
zz
at
the point
rz n1
, where
.
)1(
)1(
)(
0
zaa
za
z
Due to
)()( 0zz
, then considering that
N)(zf
, that of (13) when
1n
we get the
estimate (10):
.
))1()(1(
)12(
11
)(
)(
)(
)('
raar
ra
z
nz
z
nz
zf
zf
z
z
z
zn
n
n
n
Let us now prove that estimates (9) and (10)
cannot be improved.
For the function
),,,(
)1)((
)1(
)1(
)(
0
0
aC
ttz
dt
taa
ta
zf n
nn
z
we have
0
0
0
(1 ) 1
( ) ,
( 1) (1 )(1 )
() (2 1) .
(1 )( ( 1) )
11
()
nn
nn
nn
az
fz a a z zz
fz nz nz a z
zz a a z
zz
fz


 





Therefore, the right estimate in (9) is achieved
for the function
0()fz
at the point
rz
, and the
estimate (10) is achieved for the function
)(
0zf
at
the point
zr
, because
.
))1()(1(
)12(
11)(
)(
0
0raar
ra
δz
δ nz
λz
λnz
zf
zf
zn
n
n
n
'
''
rz
If
n
odd and
zr
, that
nn rz
.
Therefore, in the left estimate (9) for the function
)(
0zf
at the point
zr
the equal sign is reached
again, since
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
449
Volume 23, 2024
011
() 111
zr nn
ar
fz a a r rr





 

Let now
n
even.
If
Ν.)12(21062 ,...,kk,...,,,n
Then
1
n
i
and for
irz
we have
rizrriz nnnn ,
.
Therefore, for the function
),,,(
)1)(1(
)1(
)1(
)(
0
1
aC
tt
dt
itaa
ita
zf n
nn
z
at the point
irz
we get
1(1 ) 1
() ( 1) (1 )(1 )
(1 ) 1 ,
( 1) (1 )(1 )
z ir nn
nn
z ir
a iz
fz a a iz zz
ar
a a r rr



 
 






which proves that the left estimate (9) is not
improved when
N.)12(2 ,kkn
If
N41284 k,...,k,...,,,n
, that
1
n
i
and for
riz n
n2
we have
.
2nnnn rriz
Besides,
.
2
222
rririizi n
n
n
n
n
n
Therefore , at the point
riz n
n2
or the function
),,,(
)1)(1(
)1(
)1(
)(
02
2
2
aC
tt
dt
tiaa
tia
zf n
nn
z
n
n
n
n
we get
2
2
2
2
2(1 ) 1
() (1 )(1 )
( 1)
(1 ) 1 ,
( 1) (1 )(1 )
nn
nn
zi
n
n
n n n z i r
n
nn
a i z
fz zz
a a i z
ar
a a r rr





 








which proves the unimprovability of the left
estimate (15) in this case as well.
The theorem is proved.
At
0
from theorem 1 follows
Corollary 1. If the function
)(zf
satisfies the
condition
aazfzn
/1
))(')1((
,
then at
1 rz
there are accurate estimates
nn r
raa
ra
zf
r
raa
ra
1
1
)1(
)1(
)('
1
1
)1(
)1(
,
.
))1()(1(
)12(
1
)(
)(
raar
ra
z
nz
zf
zf
zn
n
We consider the limiting case of corollary 1
when
a
.
Corollary 2. Where
),,0,()(
n
Czf
, so
)(zf
satisfies the condition
Ezzfzn ,
2
))(')1arg((
.
Then at
1 rz
accurate estimates are made
,
1
1
1
1
)('
1
1
1
1
nn r
r
r
zf
r
r
r
.
1
2
1
)(
)(
2
r
r
z
nz
zf
zf
zn
n
Corollary 2 at
1,2
n
obtained in [6],
when
10,1,2
n
in [12], and for the case
,1,10,2
n
coincides with a special case
of grades for a class
)(
C
at
0
from [7].
Note also that when
an ,1
corollary 2
gives estimate for the class
).(
3
F
At
,
a
the following result follows
from Theorem 1.
Corollary 3. If
, , ,
n
f z C a
, so
fz
satisfies the condition
,
2
))(')1arg(( 2
zfzn
,Ez
then when
1 rz
accurate estimates are
made
22 )1(
1
1
1
)('
)1(
1
1
1
nn r
r
r
zf
r
r
r
,
2
( ) 2 2
( ) 1 1
n
n
f z nz r
zf z z r

 

.
We note that when
1
n
from corollary 3,
the estimate for the class are obtained
)(
2
F
.
Theorem 2. The exact radius of convexity
0
r
of
class
),,,(
aCn
is determined as the only root of
the equation on the interval
;1)0(
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
450
Volume 23, 2024
(2 1)
1 0 (14)
(1 )( ( 1) ) 1 1
nn
nn
y a r nr nr
r a a r r r


Proof. Let's check that in the circle
0
rz
the
convexity condition is satisfied
0
)(
)(
Re1
zf
zf
z
.
Due to the estimate (10) we get
,
))1()(1(
)12(
11
)(
)(
Re raar
ra
z
nz
z
nz
zf
zf
zn
n
n
n
from where for all
rzz ,
we find
( ) (2 1)
1 Re 1
( ) (1 )( ( 1) )
min Re min Re
11
nn
nn
z r z r
f z a r
zf z r a a r
nz nz
zz






Because for any
10, tt
, equality is fulfilled
,
111
min tr
tnr
t
tn
t
tn
rz
r
that
( ) (2 1)
1 Re 1
( ) (1 )( ( 1) )
.
11
nn
nn
f z a r
zf z r a a r
nr nr
rr





Therefore, if
);10(
0 rr
the root of equation
(14), then in the circle
0
rz
the convexity
condition is met.
We now show that equation (14) has a single
root
0
r
on the interval
;1)0(
. We denote
0
(2 1)
( ) 1 , ( ) .
1 1 (1 )( ( 1) )
nn
nn
nr nr a r
r M r
r r r a a r

Because
)(
0r
decreases by
;1)0(
from
1)0(
0
before 󰇛󰇜, in doing so
]1;0[)1(
0
in
virtue of (8),
)(rM
increases by
;1)0(
from 0
before

, then on
;1)0(
there is a single point
0
r
, in which
)()(
0rMr
, that was what needed to be
proved.
We show that the radius of the convexity cannot
be improved.
For odd
n
we consider the extremal function
),,,(
)1)(1(
)1(
)1(
)(
0
0
aC
tt
dt
taa
ta
zf n
nn
z
At the point
rz
, where
0
rr
, considering that
nn rz
, we get
''
0
'
0
(2 1)
1(1 )( ( 1) )
()
1()
11
(2 1)
1 0.
(1 )( ( 1) ) 1 1
nn
nn
nn
nn
zr
zr
az
z a a z
fz
zfz nz nz
zz
a r nr nr
r a a r r r














That is, for odd
n
the radius of convexity is
accurate.
If
n
even, then, as in proving the accuracy of the
left estimate (9), we consider two cases.
1) Let
N)....12(2,...10,6,2 kkn
. Then
1
n
i
and
nn rz
for
irz
. For the function
),,,(
)1)(1(
)1(
)1(
)(
0
1
aC
tt
dt
itaa
ita
zf n
nn
z
we have
,
11
))1()(1(
)12(
1
)(
)(
1'
1
''
1n
n
n
n
z
nz
z
nz
izaaiz
iza
zf
zf
z
and at the point , where , we find
0
11
))1()(1(
)12(
1
)(
)(
1'
01
''
1
n
n
n
n
irzz
nz
z
nz
raar
ra
zf
zf
z
Therefore, in this case, the radius of convexity
cannot be improved.
2) Let
N.,...,4,...,12,8,4 kkn
we denote
n
n
i
2
. Then
1
n
i
,
1
n
and for
rz
we
get
rzrz nn 1
,
. Because for the function
),,,(
)1)(1()1(
)1(
)( 01
1
2
aC
tt
dt
taa
ta
zf n
nn
z
we have:
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
451
Volume 23, 2024
n
n
z
nz
zaaiz
za
zf
zf
z
1))1()(1(
)12(
1
)(
)(
11
1
'
2
''
2
Because of this, at the point
rz
, where
0
rr
,
find
,0
11
))1()(1(
)12(
1
)(
)(
1'
2
''
2
n
n
n
n
rz r
nr
r
nr
raar
ra
zf
zf
z
which proves that the radius of convexity is
unimprovable in this case as well.
Theorem 2 is proved.
At
2,0 n
theorem 2 implies
Corollary 4. Accurate radius of convexity
0
r
function class
N,)(zf
satisfying the condition
,,2/1,10,10,))()1(( /1'2 Ezaaazfz
is determined as the only root of the equation on
the interval
)1;0(
.0)1()12())1()(1)(1( 22 rraraarz
At
1
,
a
from Corollary 4 we obtain the
radius of convexity of the class
)(
1
F
from [12],
and for
1
,
a
class
1
F
radius of convexity
from [6].
3.2 Distortion Theorems and Radii of
Convexity in the Case When
( ) n
fz N
Theorem 3. Let the function
)(zf
with a
decomposition of the form (1) belongs to the class
),,,(
aCn
. Then at
10, rrz
there are
exact estimates
(1 ) 1 ()
( 1) (1 )(1 )
(1 ) 1 (15)
( 1) (1 )(1 )
n
n n n
n
n n n
ar fz
a a r r r
ar
a a r r r









()
( ) 1 1
(2 1) (16)
(1 )( ( 1) )
nn
nn
n
nn
f z nz nz
zf z z z
a nr
r a a r




and the exact radius of convexity
0
r
class
),,,(
aCn
is determined as the only root of the
equation on the interval
)1;0(
(2 1)
1(1 )( ( 1) )
0 (17)
11
n
nn
nn
nn
a nr
r a a r
nr nr
rr




The proof of Theorem 3 is carried out similarly
to the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2, only Lemma 1
is applied for the case
1n
taking into account the
fact that
n
zf N)(
and therefore
)(z
from (11)
has a decomposition of the form
Eznzczcz n
n
n
n
,1...,1)( 1
1
.
Corollary 5. Let a function
)(zf
belong to the
class
.10,
2
'arg;)(),,0,0(
zfzfC nn N
Then at
10, rrz
there are exact estimates
,))1/()1(()('))1/()1((
nnnn rrzfrr
n
n
r
nr
zf
zf
z2
1
2
)(
)(
and the exact radius
0
r
of the convexity class
),,0,0(
n
C
is determined by the formula
n
nnr /122
0)1(
.
Corollary 5 follows from Theorem 3 for
.,0 a
This result for
1
coincides with the estimates
and the radius of convexity
12
0r
lass of
functions with limited rotation
,,0)(Re Ezzf
obtained in [21].
At
2,1,0 n
and at
0
the
following corollaries follow from Theorem 3.
Corollary 6, [22]. Accurate radius of the
convexity
0
r
of function class
2
)( Nzf
, satisfying
the condition
Ezaaazfz
,2/1,)()1( 2
, is
determined as the only root of the equation on the
interval
)1;0(
.0)15()45()1( 246 ararara
Corollary 7. Accurate radius of the convexity
0
r
of function class
2
)( Nzf
, satisfying the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
452
Volume 23, 2024
condition
Ezaaazf
,2/1,))(/1
is
determined by the formula
2
0
1/
1 (2 1) (1 (2 1) ) 4 ( 1) , 1;(18)
2(1 )
(1 ) , 1.
n
a n a n a a a
ra
na


At
1
this result was obtained in [22].
3.3 Generalization of Classes of Typically
Real and Close-To-Starlike Functions
In [23] introduced typically real functions, that is,
the functions
,1)0(,0)0(),(
FFzF
which takes
real values at points
)1;1(z
and at other points of
the circle
E
satisfy the condition
.0Im)(Im zzF
In [23] he also obtained a membership criterion
)(zF
to class
T
of typically real functions:
2
1
( ) Re ( ) 0, .(19)
z
F z T F z z E
z




By analogy with the class
),,,,(
aCn
,1,2/1,10,0, na
we introduce a class
),,,(
aTn
functions
N,)(zF
satisfying the
condition
1/
(1 )(1 ) ( ) , ,(20)
nn
zz
F z a a z E
z






In doing so
1. (21)
11n




Comparing (7) and (20), we get that:
( ) ( , , , ) ( ) ( ) ( , , , )(22)
nn
f z C a F z zf z T a
and at
an ,1,2,0
class
),,,(
aTn
is transformed into a class
T
of
typically real functions.
Wherein,
)1,,0,1(),,0,1( 22 TTaT
for all
.10,2/1
a
On the other hand, when
a,1,0
we obtain the class of close-to-starlike functions
introduced in [14] using the condition
.,0
)(
Re Ez
z
zF
Wherein,
),,0,0(
aTn
is a
subclass of the class of close-to-starlike functions
for all
.10,2/1
a
We note also that if the
class functions
),,,(
aCn
are univalent, then the
class functions
),,,(
aTn
generally speaking,
they are not.
Relation (22), taking into account the equality
1
)(
)()(
zF
zFz
zf
zfz
makes it easy to transfer all
results for a class
),,,(
aCn
per class
),,,(
aTn
.
Theorem 4. Let
).,,,()(
aTzF n
N
Then
at
1 rz
there are exact estimates
(1 ) ()
( 1) (1 )(1 )
(1 ) , (23)
( 1) (1 )(1 )
nn
nn
a r r Fz
a a r r r
a r r
a a r r r









() 1
( ) 1 1
(2 1) . (24)
(1 )( ( 1) )
nn
nn
F z nz nz
zF z z z
ar
r a a r



and the exact radius of starlikeness
*
r
of the class
),,,(
aTn
is determined as the only root of
equation (14) on the interval
)1;0(
.
If, in addition to the conditions of the theorem,
the function
)(zF
expands into a series of the form
(1), then we have exact estimates
(1 ) ()
( 1) (1 )(1 )
(1 ) , (25)
( 1) (1 )(1 )
n
n n n
n
n n n
a r r Fz
a a r r r
a r r
a a r r r









() 1
( ) 1 1
(2 1) . (26)
(1 )( ( 1) )
nn
nn
n
nn
F z nz nz
zF z z z
a nr
r a a r



and the exact radius of starlikeness
*
r
of the class
),,,(
aTn
is defined as the only root of equation
(17) on the interval
)1;0(
.
Corollary 8. Let
),,,0,()(
aTzF n
that is
)(zF
satisfies the condition
,
)(
)1( /1 aa
z
zF
zn
.Ez
Then at
1 rz
there are exact estimates
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
453
Volume 23, 2024
,
1
)1(
)1(
)(
1
)1(
)1(
nn r
r
raa
ra
zF
r
r
raa
ra
))1()(1(
)12(
1
)1(1
1
)(
)(
raar
ra
z
zn
zF
zF
zn
n
and the exact starlikeness radius
*
r
of the class
),,0,(
aTn
is determined as the only root of the
equation on the interval
)1;0(
(2 1)
10
(1 )( ( 1) ) 1
( ) ;
(2 1)
10
(1 )( ( 1) ) 1
()
nn
n n n
n
n
n
a nr nr
r a a r r
for the case when F z
a r nr
r a a r r
for the case when F z


N
N.
At
an ,1,2,0
class
),,,(
aTn
coincides the class
T
and from
Corollary 8 we obtain the well-known estimates
[23] in the class
T
22
2
21
2
1
1
)(
)(
,
)1(
)(
)1)(1(
)1(
r
r
z
z
zF
zF
z
r
r
zF
rr
rr
n
and exact radius of starlikeness
15(215
2
1
*
r
of class
T
, previously
found in [24].
We note also that when
1,0,2
n
Corollary 8 the exact radius of starlikeness of the
subclass of typically real functions
,)( 2
NzF
satisfying the condition
,,
)(
)1( 2Ezaa
z
zF
z
as the only root of the equation on the interval
)1;0(
,0)15()45()1( 246 ararara
found in
[22].
At
0
it turns out the class
,,
)(
:)( /1
Ezaa
z
zF
zF
the exact radius
starlikeness of which, in the case
,)( n
zF N
is
determined by formula (18), which coincides with
the result from [22].
From here at
a
we get class
,,
2
)(
arg:)(
Ez
z
zF
zF
whose exact radius
of starlikeness is
.)1( /122* n
nnr
At
1
n
is get the radius of starlikeness
.12
*r
from [21] of the class of close-to-
starlike functions
,)( NzF
satisfying the
condition
.,0
)(
Re Ez
z
zF
Note. Recently, a whole series of articles has
been published, [16], [17], [18], [19], devoted to
finding the radii of starlikeness of various classes
of close-to-starlike functions with respect to some
subclasses of the class
*
S
(Recently, a whole series
of articles has been published, [23], [24], devoted
to finding the radii of starlikeness of various classes
of close-to-starlike functions with respect to some
subclasses of the class:
*()
( ): ,0 1,
()
Fz
S F z Rez z E
Fz




ς
starlike functions
)(zf
of order
,
2
*()
( ): 1 1,
()
LFz
S F z z z E
Fz








ς
lemniscate
starlike functions and others).
If in Theorems 2-3 instead of the convexity
condition we use the condition
()
1
()
fz
Rez fz


convexity of order
1,,0
and accordingly
in Theorem 4 condition
()
()
Fz
Rez Fz
starlike of
order
, then we obtain the exact radius of
starlikeness of order
of class
),,0,(
n
T
as
the only one on the interval (0;1) root of the
equation:
(2 1)
10
(1 )( ( 1) 1 1
( ) ; (27)
(2 1)
10
(1 )( ( 1) 11
()
n n n
n n n n
n
nn
nn
a nr nr nr
r a a r r r
forthecasewhen F z
a r nr nr
r a a r rr
forthecasewhen F z



N
N.
In special cases, when
NzF )(
, we obtain a
number of well-known results.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
454
Volume 23, 2024
1) For
an ,0,1,2
we obtain
the star radius [16] of order
class
EzzF
z
z
zFK ,0)(
1
Re:)( 2
1
as the only root of the equation (0;1) on the interval
0)1()1(2)1( 24
rrrr
.
2) For
an ,0,1
we obtain
a star radius of order
class
EzzF
z
z
zFF ,0)(
1
Re:)(
3
from [18] as the only root of the equation
,013
2
rr
, on the interval (0;1), that is
*3 9 4 1
2
r

3) For
an ,1
we obtain a
star radius of order
class
EzzF
z
z
zFF ,0)(
)1(
Re:)( 2
4
from [18] as the only root of the equation
014)1( 2
rr
, on the interval (0;1),
that is
2
*23
1
r

.
Other applications of the
, , ,
n
Ta
class of
almost star-like functions, as well as promising
tasks for further research, are to find estimates of
the coefficients of functions of the
, , ,
n
Ta
class, as well as the radii of the starlikeness of this
class relative to such subclasses of the
*
S
class as
**
1 / (1 )S S z z
is a highly starlike,
** 2
21
1 log 1
Pz
SS z













parabolic,
**
1
L
S S z
lemniscatic,
* * 2
1S S z z
π
moon-shaped,
**
1 z
car
S S ze
cardioid and
other starlike functions.
4 Conclusion
The article introduces a class
),,,(
aCn
of
functions
)(zf
, satisfying the condition
.,|))()1)(1((|/1 Ezaazfzz nn
It is
shown that all functions of this class are close-to-
convex and its subclasses are the classes of
functions convex in a certain direction and
functions with bounded rotation. In class
),,,(
aCn
exact distortion theorems and exact
convexity radii are found, which generalize
previously known results. The case when the
function
fz
in the expansion in a power series
has omissions of terms.
It is also considered the class
),,,(
aTn
of
functions
)(zF
, associated with class
),,,(
aCn
functions
fz
ratio
).()( zfzzF
Class
),,,(
aTn
is a generalization of classes of
typically real and close-to-starlike functions. Exact
covering theorems and exact radii of starlikeness
are obtained in the class, which generalize
previously published results for typically real and
close-to-starlike functions.
Thus, the authors of the article, based on a
single approach, solved a number of extreme
problems for fairly wide subclasses of close-to-
convex and close-to-starlike functions. At the same
time, along with the generalization of known
results, new results are obtained in particular cases.
In conclusion, we note that the results of the
article admit of a simple generalization if, instead
of conditions (7)-(8), we use conditions of the form
)'7(,,1,))('))1((
1
1
Ezkaazfz
k
i
n
i
and
1
1. (8')
1
ki
iin
It is known that the solution of many extreme
problems for subclasses of functions
fz
from
is reduced to finding, for  
accurate estimates of the functionals
( ) ( )
max , min (28)
zr
zr
zz
z Re z Rez
zz








on the class
0n
P
defining the class of functions
fz
. In this regard, the application of evaluation
(13) for the class of regular functions
z
from
n
R
satisfying the condition
1/
( ( ))z a a

,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
455
Volume 23, 2024
1/ 2, 0 1a
, is promising, as it will further
solve a number of extreme problems related to
various subclasses of univalent functions, which in
this article is demonstrated by the example of the
class
),,,(
aCn
.
As directions for further research, we note the
following.
1) Introduction of a unified class
0n
P
of
regular functions
z
from
0
()
nсR
satisfying the
subordination condition
0
zz
,
*
0,z
P
and finding accurate estimates of
functionals (28) in this class. Here, the class of
functions
0z
is denoted by
*,P
which
conformally map the circle
E
to a region starlike
relative to the point
1w
, belonging to the half-
plane
0Rew
and symmetrical with respect to the
real axis.
2) Application of the obtained estimates of the
functionals (28) for the study of unified subclasses
of close-to-convex functions, including convex
ones in a certain direction. This includes classes of
functions for which
0
()
()
fz z
gz
,
00
n
z

P
, and
()gz
is a convex function.
3) Introduction of new subclasses of double
close-to-convex, close-to-starlike and double close-
to-starlike functions based on the class
0
n
P
and
investigation of extreme properties of functions of
these classes using functional estimates (28).
4) Finding estimates of coefficients for
functions of the classes under consideration.
References:
[1] Ozaki S., On the theory of multivalent
functions, Sci. Rep. Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku,
Sect. A. Math. Phys. Chem., Vol. 2, 1935,
pp. 167-188, [Online].
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43700132
(Accessed Date: February 1, 2024).
[2] Kaplan W., Close-to-convex schlicht
functions, Michigan Math. J., Vol. 1(2),
1952, pp. 169-185.
https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1028988895.
[3] Robertson M.S., Analytic functions star-like
in one direction, Amer. J. Math., Vol. 58.
№3, 1936, pp. 465-472, [Online].
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2370963
(Accessed Date: March 3, 2024).
[4] Goodman A.W., Univalent functions, Tampa:
Mariner. 1983, 246 p.
[5] Bshouty D., Lyzzaik A., Univalent functions
starlike with respect to a boundary point,
Contemp. Math., Vol. 382, 2005, pp. 83-87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-
247X(03)00258-0.
[6] Hengartner W., Schober G., Analytic
functions close to mappings convex in one
direction, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 28,
№2, 1971, pp. 519-524.
[7] Lecko A., Some subclasses of close-to-
convex functions, Annales Polonici
Mathematici, Vol. 58, №1. 1993, pp. 5364.
[8] Noshiro K., On the theory of schlicht
functions, J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ.
Ser. I Math., Vol. 2, 3, 1934, pp. 129-
155. https://doi.org/10.14492/hokmj/1531209
828.
[9] Warschawski S.E., On the higher derivatives
at the boundary in conformal mapping,
Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 1935. Vol. 38. 2.
pp. 310-340. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-
9947-1935-1501813-X.
[10] Reade M., The coefficients of close-to-
convex functions, Duke Math. J., Vol. 23,
3, 1956, pp. 459-462.
https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-56-
02342-0.
[11] Renyi A., Some remarks on univalent
functions, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-
Sklodowska. Sec. A. 3, 1959, pp. 111-121.
[12] Maiyer F.F., Geometrical properties of some
classes of functions analytic in a circle,
convex in the direction of the imaginary axis,
Science Bulletin of A. Baitursynov Kostanay
State University. Series of natural and
technical sciences, Vol. 6. No. 2, 2002, pp.
48-50.
[13] Lecko A., The class of functions convex in
the negative direction of the imaginary axis
of order (α,β), Journal of the Australian
Mathematical Society, Vol. 29(11), 2002, pp.
641650.
[14] Reade M., On close-to-convex univalent
functions, Michigan Math. J., Vol. 3. 1955,
pp. 5962. DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1031710535.
[15] Lecko A., Sim Y.J. Coefficient problems in
the subclasses of close-to-star functions.
Results Math., 2019, Vol. 3, pp. 104.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-019-1030-y.
[16] Khatter K., Lee S.K., Ravichandran V.,
Radius of starlikeness for classes of analytic
functions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11744.
2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.11744.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
456
Volume 23, 2024
[17] El-Faqeer A.S.A., Mohd M.H., Ravichandran
V., Supramaniam S., Starlikeness of certain
analytic functions, arXiv preprint
arXiv:2006.11734, 2020 arxiv.org.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.11734
[18] Sebastianc A., Ravichandran V., Radius of
starlikeness of certain analytic functions.
Math. Slovaca, 71. No. 1, 2021, pp. 83104.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.06999
[19] Sharma K., Jain N.K., Kumar S. Constrained
radius estimates of certain analytic functions.
arXiv:2305.16210v1 [math.CV] 25 May
2023.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.16210
[20] Shaffer D.B., Distortion theorems for a
special class of analytic functions, Proc.
Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 39, 2, 1973,
pp. 281-287, [Online]. https://www.sci-
hub.ru/10.2307/2039632 (Accessed Date:
February 1, 2024).
[21] MacGregor T., Functions whose derivative
has a positive real part, Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc., Vol. 104, 1962, pp. 532537.
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1962-
0140674-7.
[22] Chichra P., On the radii of starlikeness and
convexity of certain classes of regular
functions, J. of the Australian Math. Soc.,
Vol. 13, №2, 1972, pp. 208-218.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700011290.
[23] Rogosinski W., Über Positive Harmonische
Entwicklungen und typisch-reelle
Potenzreihen, Math. Zeitschr., Vol. 35, 1,
1932, pp. 93-121.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186552
[24] Libera R.J., Some radius of convexity
problems, Duke Math. J., Vol. 31, №1, 1964,
pp.143-158. DOI: 10.1215/S0012-7094-64-
03114-X.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.e
n_U
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.47
F. F. Maiyer, M. G. Tastanov,
A. A. Utemissova, N. M. Temirbekov, D. S. Kenzhebekova
E-ISSN: 2224-2880
457
Volume 23, 2024