second order of the general form is proposed.
Having solved the tasks (6), (7) and (8), (9)
for
-th step in time, we move on to the next
time layer, etc. When numerically solving problems
of filtration of a two-phase incompressible liquid,
some features of these problems should be taken
into account. For example, it is necessary to take
into account when constructing difference schemes
a feature associated with highly varying
discontinuous coefficients in sub domains. This
difficulty associated with the choice of a step is
easily eliminated when Monte Carlo algorithms
associated with the modeling of Markov chains are
used to evaluate the solution. In this case, the
transition to those points where the coefficients
suffer a gap is not carried out. That is, the
trajectories of the chain should «be able» to start at
those points, and at the transition
get to
those points in the area where the coefficients do
not have break points.
4 Conclusion
The Masket–Leverett model describing the process
of liquid filtration in a porous medium is a system
of equations taking into account saturation and
pressure obtained using nonlinear laws, solvable
Monte Carlo methods and the method of
differences in probability. We were able to apply
the algorithms of «random walk by spheres» and
«random walk along boundaries» Monte Carlo
methods to solve regular, degenerate, stationary
and non-stationary filtration problems of two
immiscible inhomogeneous incompressible liquids
in a porous medium, [19], as well as using Monte
Carlo algorithms, we solved the filtration problem
taking into account temperature (i.e., an energy
equation is added to the filtration equations) and
one model filtration problem in potentials.
References:
[1] Shakenov K.K. (2007) Solution of problem
for one model of relaxational filtration by
probability–difference and Monte Carlo
methods. Polish Academy of Sciences.
Committee of Mining. Archives of Mining
Sciences. Vol. 52, Issue 2, Krakow, 2007. P.
247 – 255.
[2] Antontsev S.N., Kazhikhov A.V.,
Monakhov V.N. (1983). "Boundary value
problems of mechanics of inhomogeneous
fluids" (Kraevye zadachi mekhaniki
neodnorodnykh zhidkostey). Novosibirsk:
Nauka.
[3] Loitsyansky L.G. (2003) Mechanics of
liquid and gas.7th edition, revised. – M.:
Bustard, 2003, p.840.
[4] H.Amann, G.P. Galdi, K. Pllecas and V.A.
Solonnikov (1997), Navier-Stokes
Equations and Related Nonlinear Problems.
Proceedings of the Sixth International
Conference NSEC-6, Palanga, Lithuania,
May 22–29, p.440.
[5] Todor Boyanov, Stefka Dimova, Krassimir
Georgiev, Geno Nikolov. (2007) Numerical
Methods and Applications, Springer Nature,
p.732.
[6] New Directions in Matematical Fluid
Mechanics. The Alexander V. Kazhikhov
Mtmorial Volume. (2010) Springer Science
and Business Media, p.414.
[7] 7.Ermakov S.M., Nekrutkin V.V., Sipin
A.A. (1984), Random processes for solving
classical equations of mathematical physics.
Nauka, –M., 1989, p.208.
[8] Shoujun Xu, Hao Wu. The Gevrey
normalization for quasi-periodic systems
under Siegel type small divisor conditions
(2016), Journal of Differential Equations,
Vol. 284, p.1223-1243.
[9] Alexander Keller, Stefan Heinrich, Harald
Niederreiter Editors. Monte Carlo and
Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2006 2008th
Edition, Kindle Edition (2008). Springer,
p.708.
[10] Mikhailov G.A. (1987). Optimization of
Monte Carlo weight methods. Nauka, – M.,
1987, p.239.
[11] Mikhailov G.A. (1974). Some questions of
the theory of Monte Carlo methods. Nauka,
Novosibirsk, 1974, p.145.
[12] Dynkin E.B. (1963) Markov processes.
Fizmatgiz, –M., 1963, p.432.
[13] Dynkin E.B., Yushkevich A.A. (1967)
Theorems and problems about Markov
processes. Nauka, –M., 1967, p.232.
[14] Sobol I.M. (1973) Numerical Monte Carlo
methods. Nauka, –M., 1973, p.312.
[15] Meyer P.A. (1976) Probability and
potentials. Mir, –M., 1976, p.436.
[16] Ermakov S.M. (1975) The Monte Carlo
method and related issues. Second edition,
expanded. Nauka, –M., 1975, p.471.
[17] Yelepov B.S., Kronberg A.A., Mikhailov
G.A., Sabelfeld K.K. (1980) Solving
boundary value problems by the Monte
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.37394/23206.2024.23.18
M. G. Tastanov, A. A. Utemissova,
F. F. Maiyer, D. S. Kenzhebekova, N. M. Temirbekov