A Network, Content, and Sentiment Analysis of Tweets about the Greek
Ministries
IORDANIS KOTZAIVAZOGLOU1, IOANNA PECHLIVANAKI1, DIMITRIOS KYDROS2,
VASILIKI VRANA1
1Department of Business Administration,
International Hellenic University,
Terma Magnisias, 62124, Serres,
GREECE
2Department of Economic Sciences,
International Hellenic University,
Terma Magnisias, 62124, Serres,
GREECE
Abstract: - Twitter has been widely acknowledged as a crucial platform for political communication and
deliberation. In this sense, research on information extraction from Twitter is growing rapidly but usually uses
sentiment analysis in various aspects. The purpose of this study is to examine the networks of Twitter
interactions among formal and informal political actors, as well as to identify the key topics of discussion and
the sentiments conveyed by users about the 19 Greek ministries, by proposing a combination of three methods
that includes not only sentiment, but also social network and content analysis. The research findings showed
that not all ministries receive equal attention, resulting in interesting differences among them. Such a study can
provide insights into the public’s views, reactions, and concerns, and may help governments and/or ministries
better understand and align their policies and communication with them. In addition, the proposed framework
offers a multifaceted exploration of Twitter interactions, discussions, and sentiments that may be applied
virtually in every large-scale, public or private organization.
Key-Words: Greek ministries, Twitter, political actors, social network analysis, content analysis, sentiment
analysis, centrality metrics
Received: July 19, 2022. Revised: August 21, 2023. Accepted: September 23, 2023. Published: October 10, 2023.
1 Introduction
Twitter, a very well-known and popular social
media platform, has been rebranded as X since late
July 2023 (in the following, we will use the term
Twitter to refer to this platform). Twitter facilitates
political communication and promotes deliberation
between organizations and their stakeholders, [1],
[2]. It has become a crucial tool for participatory
democracy, [3], as it enables formal and informal
political actors to engage in frequent, interactive,
and efficient communication. Formal political actors
are organizations or institutions that can directly
influence political decisions, [4]. On the other hand,
informal political actors, including regular people
involved in online political discussions, actively
utilize Twitter to share opinions, create social
networks, and encourage political expression and
deliberation, [5].
Since millions of users are active daily on
Twitter, it is considered to be a valuable source of
data. Since most user profiles, including those of
organizations, are open to the public, it is easy to
analyze users without concerns about their consent.
Furthermore, since all communication is unmediated
and interactive, it is relatively easy for researchers
to study the interactions and discussions of Twitter
users, gaining insights into their views and feelings,
[6], [7], [8].
The role of political actors on online platforms,
such as (and especially) Twitter, has gained a
growing interest among researchers in the field of
political communication. Major topics of discussion
include the power of digital political actors to
influence and shape the political sphere, [9], [10], or
the increasing use of social media platforms,
including Twitter, by organizations, [11], [12], [13],
and ministries, [14], [15], to engage with their
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
276
Volume 20, 2023
stakeholders and establish relationships. Finally, the
study of networks within Twitter has gained
attention from the research community, [16].
While there has been some research on the use of
social media by organizations in general, there
remains a need for further investigation into the
specific context of ministries as public organizations
and their use of social media for political
communication. Limited research has been
conducted on this topic, as evidenced by the scarcity
of studies on ministries in countries such as Greece,
which could provide valuable insights into the field
of social networking analysis and political
communication, [14], [17], [18], [19]. Exploring the
networks of users associated with ministries in
Greece or similar countries with comparable public
sector organizations could contribute significantly to
the academic discourse on this subject. Due to its
relatively under-researched nature, Greece presents
a valuable opportunity for scholars to enhance the
comprehension of the interplay between social
media and political communication in the public
sector. By focusing on Greece as a case study,
researchers can delve into unexplored areas and
generate new insights that can broaden the
understanding of this topic. To our knowledge, no
research has been done to deal not only with Greece
but also with foreign ministries or government
departments.
The paper represents a preliminary effort to
address the research gaps outlined above, with a
particular focus on the Greek ministries as a case
study. This study aims to investigate the networks of
Twitter interactions among formal and informal
political actors, as well as to identify the key topics
of discussion and the sentiments expressed by users
about the Greek ministries.
Even though there has been some research on
Greek ministries and social media, very little
attention has been paid to the rigorous analysis of
social networking among political actors. Moreover,
the country boasts over 700,000 Twitter users, [20].
In the last couple of years, the Greek ministries have
faced a variety of challenges, including economic
crises, heightened instability, high inflation,
pandemics, tense international relationships, and
upcoming elections, all of which have led to
increased social media use, [21].
The examination of citizens' opinions has always
been of interest to state institutions, particularly
during times of crisis, when decision-makers rely on
knowledge to make informed choices, [22], [23].
The study addresses this critical issue by leveraging
Twitter data to conclude a vast pool of information.
This approach provides a comprehensive and
accurate overview of Greek citizens' attitudes
toward their ministries and can be used by state
institutions to inform decision-making processes.
Therefore, it expands the field's scope theoretically,
by proposing a holistic methodology that
incorporates three methods, namely social network
analysis, content analysis, and sentiment analysis, in
contrast to previous studies on ministries, [14], [17],
[18], [19], that adopt only one of these methods.
Thus, it provides a valuable methodology, [24], with
a well-rounded perspective that overcomes the
limitations of employing only one method.
The study also has a useful practical contribution
to the public sector. It can provide governments
and/or ministries with valuable tools to better
understand the role of the formal and informal
political actors on Twitter, enhance their
engagement with the public, align their policies and
improve their interaction with the public, and
navigate the complex terrain of digital political
communication more effectively. Since Greece is a
Western-style democratic country that has many
common traits with countries with a similar political
system, the insights derived from this study may be
utilized not only by Greece but also by other
countries' governments and/or ministries.
The paper addresses the following research
questions:
RQ1: What are the characteristics of the networks
created for all 19 Greek ministries?
RQ2: Who are the most important users regarding
centrality in each Greek ministry’s network?
RQ3: What are the most important topics of
discussion among users?
RQ4: What are the feelings (sentiments)
expressed by users?
The paper continues with the literature review,
where the relevant literature is highlighted to
provide the study’s context and background. Then, a
detailed description of the methodology is
presented, including the research design, data
collection methods, and statistical techniques used
for analysis, followed by the presentation of the
findings along with a detailed analysis and
discussion of them. Corresponding visualizations
are also provided to enhance understanding. The
paper ends with the conclusions that underline the
main points of the study, as well as its limitations
and suggestions for future research.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
277
Volume 20, 2023
2 Literature Review
2.1 The Role of Twitter in Political
Communication and Discourse
Twitter, due to its interactive, interpersonal, and
dialogic nature alongside its popularity, is
considered a very important medium for
organizations in their communication and
interaction with their stakeholders, [25].
Organizations through their active Twitter account
can interact directly with them, [26]. Twitter is an
excellent example of a meeting place between
formal and informal political actors. Informal
political actors have the power to practically engage
in, shape the public sphere, and express their
opinions about organizations, [27], [28], bringing
about a further democratization of politics, [10].
Twitter allows organizations to interact with users,
and record their preferences and their opinions
following a more direct two-way model of
communication, where organizations as formal
political actors (along with Ministers or politicians)
react, respond, post, like, and share with their
stakeholders in a continuous effort to build relations.
Users as informal political actors are considered
very important elements of the corporate identity of
organizations, [29].
Studies about Twitter use by organizations as an
efficient tool for political communication and
deliberation are also plenty, but they mostly focus
on organizations from large countries, [30], [31],
[32], [33].
2.2 Twitter Network Analysis
Studying Twitter users’ networks provides useful
information about the type and size of these
networks, as well as clues about users’
characteristics, discussions, and feelings, [34], [35].
In this vein, [36], performed social network analysis
and content analysis of the tweets sent by Indian
politicians between 2019 and 2021 amid some
significant events in India. They conclude that
Twitter not only gives Indian political users new
avenues for contact but also polarizes their online
political discourse. The study, [37], looked inside
the network of Twitter users and the dissemination
of tweets on the Pension Plan policy in Indonesia.
The networks of Twitter users that participate in the
distribution of tweets have account backgrounds
related to politicians, political parties, governments,
online news media, actors, and cultural
practitioners. The responsibilities that people play in
political dialogues on Twitter were covered in the
study of, [38], based on information gathered
throughout three dates during the corruption trial of
Brazilian president Lula. To determine the users'
roles during the divisive talks, they combined social
network analysis metrics and social capital. In their
study, [39], aimed to determine which digital
influencers have the greatest influence over political
discourse on Twitter in Spain. The study's findings
reveal that political and media elites have continued
to strengthen their dominant positions as digital
influencers.
2.3 Political Sentiment Analysis on Twitter
Several previous studies tried to investigate
sentiments that users express about politics. Several
approaches are used to extract sentiment from
tweets, [40], [41]. Unsupervised methods rely on
lexicons, lists of 'positive' and 'negative' keywords,
or simply counting the frequency of each term to
estimate sentiment based on the ratio of occurrence
of two types of keywords concerning one another,
[42]. More advanced approaches employ supervised
learning techniques and prediction models, trained
on either manually classified tweets or tweets with
an emotional context, [43].
Sentiment analysis of real-world political
campaigns is also especially interesting, because it
aids in detecting patterns, understanding human
behavior, and identifying generic approaches for
analyzing user behavior in online social networks,
[44], [45]. The study,[46], discussed the 2016
Austrian presidential elections. The study, [47],
combined a lexical-based with a learning-based
approach to form a hybrid approach to sentiment
analysis. The study, [48], extracted tweets related to
India's General Elections in 2019 was carried out in
tandem with a study of sentiments among Twitter
users toward the major national political parties
participating in the electoral process. The study,
[49], examined the sentiment on Twitter to ascertain
the public's opinions before, during, and after the
U.S. elections 2020 and compared them with their
results. The findings show that, in most situations,
the election results and the mood reflected on social
media were in agreement.
The study, [50], examined how a sample of alt-
right followers behaved before and after the US
midterm elections in 2018, [51], used quantitative
and qualitative approaches to examine more than
50,000 right-wing German hate tweets that were
published during the 2017 German federal elections
to provide insight on the situation in Germany. Most
of the tweets are filled with hate speech, particularly
toward immigrants, but also at politicians and other
voters.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
278
Volume 20, 2023
Previous studies have also studied Twitter users’
sentiments on various political aspects. The study,
[52], tried to understand the agenda set by the top
European populist political party figures on Twitter,
as well as their user engagement tactics. Findings
indicated a low level of theme fragmentation, the
introduction of suggestions rather than engaging
voters, and the existence of a strong inverse
relationship between the number of tweets produced
and user interest. In a recent study, [53],
investigated Donald Trump and Jokowi's sentiments
on Twitter regarding Covid-19 policy dissemination.
The outcome demonstrates that both Jokowi and
Trump experienced more unfavorable than positive
sentiments.
The study, [54], examined the Syrian war using
sentiment analysis of tweets to determine how the
sentiment forms the contemporary political scene
and influences receiver knowledge. A training data
set was utilized for sentiment analysis to glean
insights into the tweets of various Syrian conflict
sides. The findings demonstrated that there was a
real conflict taking place on social media to affect
people's emotions.
Although sentiment analysis has gained
popularity in recent years, there remains a scarcity
of studies analyzing sentiment in the context of
ministries. For instance, [55], conducted a sentiment
analysis on tweets to assess the public opinion of the
Indonesian Ministry of Health's performance. Their
findings indicated that the vast majority of tweets
expressed negative sentiments.
3 Methodology
NodeXL Pro, an Excel template, was used to query
Twitter API, find content relevant to the Greek
ministries, and create networks of users. The official
@username of each ministry’s account was queried
and other keywords were excluded due to the poor
return of relevant data. All 19 ministries and their
official @username on Twitter are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Ministries and their corresponding official
Twitter accounts
Ministries
@usernames
Greek Ministry of Finance
@minfingr
Greek Ministry of Development and
Investments
@MinDevGR
Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs
@GreeceMFA
Greek Ministry of National Defence
@Hellenic_MOD
Greek Ministry of Education and
Religious Affairs
@MinEduGR
Greek Ministry of Labour and Social
Affairs
@labourgovgr
Greek Ministry of Health
@YpYgGR
Greek Ministry of Environment &
Energy
@YpenGr
Greek Ministry of Citizen Protection
@yptpgr
Greek Ministry of Climate Crisis and
Civil Protection
@GSCP_GR
Greek Ministry of Culture and Sports
@cultureGR
Greek Ministry of Justice
@MinJustGR
Greek Ministry of Interior
@ypesgr
Greek Ministry of Migration &
Asylum
@migrationgovgr
Greek Ministry of Tourism
@MinTourGR
Greek Ministry of Administrative
Reform and Electronic Governance
@MinDigitalGr
Greek Ministry of Infrastructure and
Transport
@ypomeofficial
Greek Ministry of Mercantile Marine
and Island Policy
@naftilias
Greek Ministry of Rural
Development and Food
@MinagricPress
All collected data span a period of seven to ten
days, with the latest retrieval applied on 12 July
2022. It was selected as a representative period of
the country with an intense political agenda. Due to
restrictions enforced by the Twitter API, there are
limitations on the volume and frequency of tweets
that can be retrieved. The time period is chosen
since it signifies the beginning of summer, a period
largely occupied by a discussion on tourism and the
relevant economic outcomes. This period can also
be characterized as a typical and representative one
from the political, economic, and social point of
view. Specifically, issues such as the energy and
economic crisis, the Greek-Turkish relations, the
Russian-Ukraine war, and a new bill for tertiary
education mainly occupied the then-public sphere.
Tweets are categorized into five types: 1) tweets,
2) retweets, 3) mentions, 4) mentions-in-retweets,
and 5) replies. Tweets, mentions and replies can be
subsumed under the label real content because they
do not replicate already stated information. Real
content is most frequently the basis for drawing
conclusions, [34]. Retweets and mentions-in-
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
279
Volume 20, 2023
retweets are only included in calculating the size
and volume of a ministry’s network.
Each search procedure results in a network. Each
user posting content with the keyword used
automatically becomes a node in the network and
develops relationships (edges) in the form of
(re)tweets, mentions (in retweets), and replies.
Networks resulting from Twitter data are directed,
because the content is addressed to specific users.
Understanding the structure of a network is the
point of Social Network Analysis (SNA), [56]. In
the context of the study, finding who communicates
with whom and how their ties develop, could shed
some light on the perceived importance of each
Greek Ministry. The networks created in this step
further provide the starting point for the content and
sentiment analysis that will follow.
Content analysis is a useful tool for discovering
and organizing categories, themes, and meanings
present within a text. Here, content analysis relies
on word adjacencies or word pairs, [35], [57], to
create networks of words (textual networks)
neighboring each other within texts that are studied
in terms of social network analytic techniques. SNA
focuses not only on the frequency of words in a text
but also deals with the positional properties of the
words to conclude the main topics, the relationship
between words, their proximity, and their
coexistence in a text, [58].
Sentiment analysis uses language processing
techniques to discover meanings, find the sentiment
running through a text, and detect the public
emotions of a tweet (whether it is positive, negative,
expresses anger, etc.), [24]. A lexicon-based
approach was used for detecting the sentiment of
tweets in the networks because it has been proven
sufficient in coverage and precision rates, [59].
In both content and sentiment analyses, the
original data were filtered to perform relevant
analyses on tweets, mentions, and replies. Data
include tweets in many languages (Greek, English,
Arabic, etc.), but the analysis focused only on Greek
and partly English, since English ranks highest in
usage on Twitter, [60]. English tweets were
incorporated when they took up at least 20% of the
total comments in a ministry’s network. Wherever
the percentage of tweets was beyond that threshold,
another network was created only for English
comments. The ministries eligible to be studied for
English comments are listed in Table 2.
Greek tweets were studied using the lexicon
developed by, [59], and English ones using the NRC
Emotion Lexicon, [61]. In both cases, some
preprocessing was done in raw data, such as stop-
word removal, lemmatizing, etc. After this
procedure, lists of word pairs were created for each
ministry. These pairs were used to create new,
semantic networks that are used for the content
analysis.
Table 2. Percentage of Greek and English comments
in some ministries
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Overall Metrics of Networks
RQ1 investigates the characteristics of Greek
Ministry networks. In Table 3, the ministries are
presented ranked in descending order according to
the total number of edges (relationships developed
among its nodes).
Table 3. Overall size metrics of all networks
Ministries
Unique
Edges
Edges
With
Duplicates
Total
Edges
@MinEduGR
2486
33938
36424
@GreeceMFA
6461
8901
15362
@Hellenic_MOD
764
1140
1904
@GCSP_GR
918
902
1820
@YpYgGR
716
854
1570
@cultureGR
823
600
1423
@MinTourGR
817
271
1088
@MinDevGR
538
445
983
@labourgovgr
88
569
657
@YpenGr
211
156
367
@yptpgr
279
34
313
@naftilias
174
59
233
@ypesgr
151
39
190
@MinDigitalGr
95
20
115
@minfingr
59
45
104
@migrationgovgr
79
18
97
@MinagricPress
67
4
71
@ypomeofficial
31
6
37
@MinJustGR
22
0
22
As expected, not all Greek ministries draw equal
interest. As evidenced by Table 3, the Ministries of
Ministries
Greek
English
Total
%Greek
%English
@GreeceMFA
1633
2815
5552
29.41%
50.70%
@labourgovgr
61
267
454
13.44%
58.81%
@cultureGR
61
454
550
11.09%
82.55%
@MinJustGR
10
12
22
45.45%
54.55%
@migrationgovgr
22
12
41
53.66%
29.27%
@MinDigitalGr
21
27
62
33.87%
43.55%
@MinTourGR
238
123
416
57.21%
29.57%
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
280
Volume 20, 2023
Education and Religious Affairs (@MinEduGR),
Foreign Affairs (@GreeceMFA), National Defense
(@Hellenic_MOD), Climate Crisis and Civil
Protection (@GCSP_GR), Health (@YpYgGR and
Culture and Sports (@cultureGR) are the ministries
with the largest networks on Twitter, ranging from
1423 to 36424 total edges. As one moves down
Table 3, users tend to interact less and less with the
content presented.
Ranking in Table 3 generally also reflects the
interests of the Greek public. It is only natural, for
instance, to find the Ministry of Education and
Religious Affairs on the top spot. Public education
in Greece has undergone frequent changes in recent
years, causing instability for both students and
parents. The curriculum has been modified multiple
times and exams have been restructured,
necessitating rapid adaptation to new conditions,
particularly for those in high school. The availability
of teaching staff is a widely discussed issue, with
substitute teachers needed each year to fill vacant
positions. This problem is particularly acute in the
summer when a surge of traffic is generated on
Twitter as the selection of these teachers takes
place, [62].
Equally expected is the appearance of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Defense
in the subsequent places. The geopolitical position
of Greece often brings it face to face with national
or supranational issues pertinent to national defense
and security, energy, etc., [63]. The nation’s defense
discourse is strongly propagated across Greek
society, considering that Greece sits in the Balkan
region, where issues between neighboring states
have yet to be resolved. It is only recently that
Greece and Northern Macedonia have signed a
treaty about the legal name of the latter; both
countries faced significant backlash from within
their territory, which was also mirrored in online
activity, [64]. Sometimes such issues are so
aggravated that they tread beyond political solutions
and into the military domain. Airspace violations
among countries in the region, for instance, are par
for the course, [65], and sometimes escalate to
armed altercations (e.g., the Kosovo War). All this
justifies the extensive engagement on Twitter
around those two ministries.
The Ministry of Climate Crisis and Civil
Protection is next on the list. As per the ministry's
official website, it is entrusted with the task of
averting disasters of any nature and executing
meticulous plans to curtail their impact, [66]. The
ministry garnered public attention during the
COVID-19 outbreak and has since been at the
forefront, largely due to the ongoing health crisis.
Additionally, with Greece experiencing annual
wildfires and earthquakes, and the global issue of
climate change, it is no surprise that the ministry's
Twitter network is among the largest.
It is not a surprise to see that the Ministry of
Health ranks fifth on the list of Twitter influencers.
It should be remembered that at the time of our data-
collection procedures, the COVID-19 pandemic
crisis was active. However, some Greek-specific
issues contributed to the ministry’s significant
presence. We detected discussions about the
understaffing of the national health system which
has been ongoing for years, even before the
COVID-19 pandemic, which (reasonably) has raised
a surge of interest in such issues, especially due to
the increased need for healthcare workers. Strong
criticism from the public towards the government
for its handling of the crisis is present. One area of
concern is the healthcare workers' contracts, which
are often not renewed, further exacerbating the
understaffing issue, [67]. Discussions on the lack of
essential equipment and medication in Greek
hospitals are not only present but have become a
recurring topic in the public health system's
problems.
In the last position of the ‘big’ networks, we see
the Ministry of Culture and Sports. This fact is not a
surprise, since the Greek ancient civilization,’s
remains in buildings and museums are a common
topic in discussions at all levels, since not only the
modern Greek national identity has been linked with
the ancient world, but also the plethora of museums,
ancient locations, etc., play an important role to the
economic life through tourism. During the time
period of our data collection, a large proportion of
the discussions were talking about the repatriation
of the Parthenon Marbles, which are currently being
displayed in the British Museum. The question of
whether these ancient treasures should be returned
to Greece has been a hot topic for more than 30
years, [68], and now online platforms, such as
Twitter, are adding a new dimension to the debate.
The issue of cultural property and its connection to
Greek national identity has long been a matter of
public concern and this is no less true in the era of
social media. Greek culture is particularly
fascinating, because it extends far beyond the
borders of Greece itself, capturing the interest of
people from around the world.
Some visualizations of these networks are
presented in Figure 1. Examples include one large
network of the Ministry of Education and Religious
Affairs in Figure 1(a), a smaller one of the Ministry
of Labor in Figure 1(b), and one very small
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
281
Volume 20, 2023
network, that of the Ministry of Justice in Figure
1(c).
(a) The Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs
Network
(b) The Ministry of Labor Network
(c) the Ministry of Justice Network
Fig. 1: Three different-sized networks. Lots of
users interact with the Ministry of Education, but
very few know about the Ministry of Labor
4.2 Types of Tweets
Another important observation about networks
concerns the different types of tweets for all 19
Greek ministries’ networks. Types of content are
tweets, retweets, mentions, mentions-in-retweets,
and replies. In Figure 2, the percentage of each type
of content for each ministry’s network is presented,
using color coding to make distinctions
comprehensible.
Fig. 2: Types of Tweets for each Greek Ministry
Plain tweets are the type least appearing in
Figure 2 and mentions-in-retweets are generally the
type with the most widespread presence. Data seem
to suggest that information on social networks is
spread mainly through retweets (mentions-in-
retweets are also essentially retweets) and mentions.
It is noteworthy that almost always users refer to
another actor by way of @username convention or
take a stance toward something somebody else has
said through reposting that content. Retweeting
means users find value in a post and want to share it,
effectively leveraging the ideas of people they deem
important. Opinion sharing becomes easier by
mentioning someone or retweeting a post, [69].
However, other researchers have questioned such an
approach and proposed different procedures (see our
discussion on content and sentiment analysis).
4.3 Vertex Level Metrics
This section focuses on the vertices and more
specifically goes over the following centrality
metrics: in-degree, out-degree, and betweenness
centrality. In and Out degree centrality metrics
count the number of connections a vertex creates
within the network. In-degree represents the number
of edges other vertices have formed toward a vertex;
in other words, it is the number of edges where the
arrow points to the user. It shows how engaged the
community is with the specific vertex. Out-degree
centrality represents the number of edges a vertex
has formed toward other vertices, which translates
into the number of edges where the arrow points
outward to other users. High out-degree centrality
means that a vertex has tweeted a lot wanting to
reach other users in the network. Out-degree
centrality shows how prominent or actively engaged
a user is, respectively.
Betweenness centrality is a metric that examines
how many times a node lies in the shortest path to
other nodes, or else to what extent a user acts as a
bridge to other users. High betweenness centrality
means that many users depend on a specific vertex
to relate to others, [70]. That specific vertex better
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
282
Volume 20, 2023
controls the distribution of information, [56], [71].
In this case, users with high betweenness centrality
could be serving as bridges to users that might
otherwise not have direct communication with
respect to their interest in the Greek ministries.
In this phase of the research, an analysis was
conducted to identify the top ten vertices in each
Greek Ministry network based on in- and out-
degree, as well as betweenness centrality.
Subsequently, the accounts were accessed by each
user to discern whether they were formal or
informal political actors. Distinguishing between
personal and business Twitter profiles was a
challenging task, as the platform allows anyone to
create an account and post personal information
voluntarily. This made it necessary to inspect many
profiles manually to ensure accurate categorization.
Due to the nature of the data, formal political
actors were split into formal individuals (people)
and formal organizations (government institutions).
If a user is a minister, a statesman, or a politician we
consider him a formal political actor, of the
individual type. Ministries, political parties,
municipalities, research centers, institutes,
federations, Universities, museums that belong to
the state, etc., are considered formal political actors,
of the organization type.
Similarly, informal political actors are split into
individuals and organizations. Everyday users that
are not professionally involved in politics are
considered informal political actors, of the
individual type. NGOs, private companies, private
professional associations, movements, etc., are
considered informal political actors, of the
organization type. There is finally a third category
that includes all organizations and individuals
related to the media (e.g., journalists).
Figure 3 shows the total percentage of formal
and informal political actors, and the media for the
in-degree centrality metric. The distribution of
inward-looking edges is not even: formal political
actors rank higher in this metric. On average, 73%
of tweets are targeted toward formal political actors.
We consider such an outcome reasonable because
informal political actors (and media) usually
respond to what formal political actors have to say
and not the other way around. Vertices with high in-
degree most often turn out to be ministers and/or
substitute ministers (e.g., @sofiazacharaki,
@tsiaras_kostas, @ nikosdendias, @ g_plakiotakis),
state politicians (e.g., @ spiliosl, @ kyranakis etc.),
and the Prime Minister (@primeministergr) etc.
Fig. 3: In-degree distribution of user types
The exact opposite is the case of out-degree
centrality. Figure 4 shows the total percentage of
formal and informal political actors, as well as
media in terms of the out-degree centrality metric.
The distribution of formal, informal, and media
actors is visible. Edges starting from informal
political actor vertices and looking outward are
overwhelmingly more than those starting from
formal political actors (or media). In some cases,
they reach percentages as high as 100% and are over
80% most of the time. The data therefore confirm
that social media have indeed provided a platform
for engagement and a stepping-stone to co-creating
the public sphere, [27].
Fig. 4: Out-degree distribution of user types
Results in betweenness centrality are similar to
out-degree centrality. Informal political actors score
higher than formal ones in terms of their ability to
mediate between further users and let information
reach larger audiences. This finding might be
explained as the informal political actors are the best
ranking category in out-degree centrality. They
spread the information, mostly address formal
political actor nodes, and create communities with
their extended engagement. Figure 5 shows
betweenness centrality both for formal and informal
political actors and media.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
283
Volume 20, 2023
Figure 5: Betweenness centrality distribution of user
types
4.4 Content Analysis
Content analysis is carried out on real content to
answer RQ3. Figure 6 shows a comparison of real
content percentages across tweet types. Ministries
are ranked in descending order according to the
percentage of real content in the network. As
already seen, not all networks are equal in terms of
size and this also applies to real content; however,
the ranking according to real content is different
from that of overall content. Real content is
essential in finding the real word pairs and the
sentiment in comments that is not just a
reproduction (as in retweets for example).
Fig. 6: Percentage of real content
Adjacent words (word pairs) form a pair of
connected nodes. Each ministry’s network is created
taking into consideration its size. In small networks,
all word pairs are included. In larger networks, word
pairs that appear over 10 times were included due to
space constraints.
Both English and Greek networks were
examined (Greek word pairs are translated into
English). Only the Ministries of Justice
(@MinJustGR), Administrative Reform and
Electronic Governance (@MinDigitalGr), and
Migration & Asylum (@migrationgovgr) have no
word pairs available after all the preprocessing
previously described. This is surprising considering
that @MinJustGR ranks highest in real content. A
possible explanation lies in the proportional nature
of the data. When a network has very few total
edges (@MinJustGR with 22 edges ranks lowest in
that respect), it also has fewer types of tweets
(@MinJustGR has only mentions and replies). This
is why the largest networks are presented in terms of
total node count: those networks also have the
largest pool of real content in absolute numbers.
Accordingly, the two largest English networks are
visualized in terms of the number of English tweets:
@GreeceMFA and @CultureGR.
Fig. 7: MineduGR word-pairs network
The first network presented (Figure 7) is the
Ministry of Education. Talks about ASEP (a state
institution that holds at certain intervals written
exams when the state needs employees in the public
sector) of 2008 generally take up most of the
discussions within this ministry’s network. Such an
exam was carried out in 2008 and some people who
succeeded back then are still waiting to be
appointed. This issue concerns @MineduGR
because permanent teaching positions are normally
handed out through this ASEP exam. People are
raising their voices for meritocracy and equal
opportunities.
In Figure 8(a), the Greek content from the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs is presented. The
@GreeceMFA Twitter handle features
conversations centered around corruption,
particularly in relation to the Novartis scandal,
which involves allegations of government officials
accepting bribes to promote a pharmaceutical
company. Users mention the names of officials
involved in the scandal and discuss issues related to
the translation of specific documents. The
discussion spans various topics, covering different
aspects of the situation and extending throughout
the entire semantic network.
In Figure 8(b), it is noticeable that the discussion
among the individuals does not revolve around
internal Greek issues. This is understandable as
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
284
Volume 20, 2023
most of them are not native Greek citizens. Instead,
they express concerns about the slow visa issuance
process, which hinders their ability to stay in
Greece. Additionally, the conversation shifts
towards the ongoing Tigray conflict in Ethiopia
(November 2020-November 2022). Several
individuals in the network highlight the urgent need
for the international community to provide
humanitarian aid to those affected by the conflict.
(a) Greek content
(b) English content
Fig. 8: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greek (a)
and English (b) word-pairs networks
Figure 9 presents the Greek word networks
related to the Ministry of Defense, highlighting key
topics discussed within these networks. These
include Greek international relations with a
particular focus on military affairs, such as the
ongoing tensions with Turkey and frequent airspace
violations in the Aegean region. Additionally, the
need for providing aid to Ukraine in the form of
military or humanitarian materials is also
mentioned. Notably, an interstate agreement
between Greece and Germany has been established,
which involves the exchange of older military
vehicles from Greece to Ukraine, to be replaced by
modern ones provided by Germany. This agreement
is especially relevant to the aforementioned
humanitarian efforts.
Fig. 9: The Ministry of Defense word-pairs network
Finally, Figure 10 presents the semantic
network of tweets related to the Ministry of Culture,
which focuses on English tweets as they were more
numerous than the relevant Greek ones. The
network analysis shows that @cultureGR users are
primarily concerned with the Parthenon marbles,
which remain in the British Museum despite being
part of Greek cultural heritage. The users express a
strong desire for the marbles to be returned to their
"ancient" home, reflecting a larger ongoing debate
about cultural repatriation.
Fig. 10: The Ministry of Culture English word-pairs
network
4.5 Sentiment Analysis
RQ4 aims to analyze the sentiments expressed by
users in the context of each ministry network. The
sentiment analysis is conducted on Greek
comments, which are categorized as either positive
or negative in terms of their polarity. The results of
this analysis are presented in the figures below. In
Figure 11, positive comments are presented in blue
and negative in orange. The negative comments are
more than the positive ones. Most actors post
comments expressing a general negativity toward
the ministries. The available data suggests that users
may not be as satisfied with the Greek ministries, as
positive comments appear to be less common. This
trend appears to be consistent across all 18
ministries, except @MinDigitalGr, for which no
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
285
Volume 20, 2023
data is available due to the process of removing
non-real content and implementing a lexicon-based
sentiment analysis. Given this pervasive negativity,
it may be worthwhile for officials to investigate
further to identify the underlying causes and
potential areas for improvement.
Fig. 11: Positive and negative sentiments
For a more detailed presentation of the general
feelings of actors, sentiments are classified (anger,
disgust, fear, sadness, happiness, and surprise) in
Figure 12. Anger, disgust, and fear take up the
largest percentages overall. The sentiment of
surprise has a great percentage because both
positive and negative words could belong in this
category. The general negativity expressed by users
might be chalked up to the fact that people have to
deal with unprecedented circumstances and
therefore harsh political decisions on the ministries
part. Other studies have also noted such overarching
negativity in Greek Twitter, [72], which might point
to a broad dissatisfaction of the Greek public toward
government organizations.
One could make the case that there is
misrepresentation of political voices on Twitter
which would lead to skewed results. For instance, it
has been found that Twitter users in the US are more
likely to be Democrats compared to the average US
adult, [73], with obvious implications as to the
sentiment they express in their tweets; the
differences between the two groups are not limited
to political views, but span a broad range of
demographics or ideological stances without
however being overly pronounced (ibid.). Intuitively
speaking, similar discrepancies also appear in the
Greek case, but not to the extent that they create a
distorted picture of the general public’s sentiment.
Fig. 12: Sentiment in greater detail
Figure 13 presents the polarity of the English
comments.
Fig. 13: English positive-negative comments
The distribution differs from the Greek
comments. Within the English comments, positive
and negative sentiments are similarly distributed in
the ministries’ networks. There appears to be a
notable difference in the sentiment expressed in
posts written in English versus those written in
Greek. Specifically, posts written in Greek by users
who are experiencing the daily realities of Greek life
tend to express a general sense of dissatisfaction and
negativity towards the ministries and their policies.
However, posts written in English by users who
may not necessarily be Greek seem to view the
situation in a less negative light.
Fig. 14: Sentiments of English comments
Based on the data presented in Figure 14, it
appears that sentiments expressed in English-
language posts are more evenly distributed
compared to those expressed in posts written in
Greek. The sentiments expressed by Greek users
appear to be more varied and are primarily
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
286
Volume 20, 2023
characterized by negative emotions such as anger,
desperation, and fear about their future and lives in
relation to Greece's public sector. By contrast,
English-language posts suggest a wider range of
emotions and do not seem to point to a clear
potential sentiment.
5 Conclusions and Implications
The rise in social media usage has compelled
government ministries to create their profiles to
better engage with citizens, promote their policies,
and disseminate messages rapidly to a broad
audience. Twitter is particularly useful for citizens
to express their opinions and discuss government
policies. The platform also produces vast amounts
of text, [74], with political insights that can be
analyzed to gauge public opinion, understand
citizens' political sentiment, and forecast future
trends. Twitter's unmediated communication
capabilities allow ministries to communicate
directly with the general public, rather than relying
on the elites who control mainstream media.
However, research on ministries and their networks
on social media is limited.
This article seeks to address this gap by
proposing a framework to examine Twitter
interactions among formal and informal political
actors in the Greek ministries. [75]. The studies,
[76], [77], highlighted the need to integrate social
network analysis with other qualitative methods for
gaining a more comprehensive and deeper
understating of social phenomena. Thus, this paper
adopts a more holistic framework for studying
Twitter interactions among formal and informal
political actors and gains deeper insights into the
complex landscape of the Greek Ministries and the
discussions surrounding them on Twitter. The
framework aims to identify the major topics of
discussion and the sentiments expressed by users.
By examining typical networks and discussions
formed around ministries during ordinary periods,
this article can provide valuable insights into
political communication. The proposed framework
offers a multifaceted investigation of Twitter
interactions and can be applied to virtually any case
where a researcher needs to explore the general
discussions and sentiments about a large-scale,
public, or private organization.
The study investigated the characteristics of
Twitter networks related to the 19 Greek ministries
and found that not all ministries receive equal
attention. Specifically, the Ministries of Education
and Religious, Foreign Affairs, National Defense,
Climate Crisis and Civil Protection, Health, and
Culture and Sports are more frequently mentioned
on Twitter. This information can provide insights
into the interests, issues, concerns, and reactions of
the public or specific groups in the Greek context.
Thus, it is crucial not only for governments, but also
for specific ministries to understand these
preferences to better align goals, policies, and
priorities with the needs and views of the public, or
adjust their communication accordingly.
Given that Twitter opinions and comments can
be considered an expression of activated public
opinion, these findings can be useful for
governments to better understand the public and
prioritize targets and policies based on unbiased
opinions and concerns. However, the study also
revealed that not all ministries take full advantage of
Twitter to engage citizens effectively, which is
essential at a time when public confidence in the
government is dwindling.
To effectively engage with the public, ministries
should monitor and evaluate the impact of their
Twitter activity. It is essential to identify Twitter
accounts that perform well, as they have the greatest
influence on public perception and can serve as
examples for less prominent ministries to learn
from. By adapting and learning from each other,
ministries can shape their Twitter communication
strategies to enhance public value creation. Twitter
makes it easy to share opinions by mentioning or
retweeting others, [70], creating communities of
users who may be formal or informal political
actors.
The study examines the centrality of vertices in a
network to identify the most influential formal and
informal political actors. Formal political actors,
including ministries, have a high in-degree
centrality rate, indicating that they receive many
comments and have a significant impact on
engaging the public. This finding aligns with the
research conducted by, [37], which revealed that
accounts actively involved in disseminating tweets
on Twitter mainly consist of formal political actors.
They are critical in establishing credibility, building
trust, and promoting transparency for the ministry.
Identifying these prominent accounts is also useful
for less prominent Twitter accounts that can attract
readers' interest by responding to them with a
unique perspective or valuable information.
Additionally, media outlets can scan these
prominent accounts to obtain a "summary statistic"
on the distribution of viewpoints on a particular
political issue.
Informal political actors, on the other hand, have
high out-degree and betweenness centrality rates,
indicating that they play a bridging role in
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
287
Volume 20, 2023
disseminating information. Accounts with high
betweenness centrality have the power to direct
information flow and can demonstrate their
expertise by sharing ideas with others, [75]. This
finding suggests that informal political actors can be
equally influential in shaping public opinion, and
media outlets should also consider their opinions in
reporting on political issues. The study, [78], also
found that informal political actors have great
influence. In summary, the study highlights the
importance of both formal and informal political
actors in shaping public opinion and emphasizes the
need for media outlets to consider a diverse range of
perspectives when reporting on political issues.
The last section of the study focuses on the most
frequent discussions among users and the sentiments
they express when they post a Tweet. Greek
comments generally express negativity toward all 19
Greek ministries. Citizen sentiment analysis is the
“new eye of government”, [79]. Feelings and
opinions of the public can act as a barometer, that
reflects the nation's state of affairs, problems, and
citizens’ expectations. Moreover, discovering
unfavorable public opinions and concerns could
offer helpful input to pinpoint problematic policies
and improve them to handle any emerging tensions
between the public and ministries. The knowledge
and understanding of public sentiments allow
governments and ministries to make decisions that
will guide and control government management.
The sentiments expressed by Greek users on Twitter
appear to be more strongly negative than those
expressed by English users. This may be because
Greek users have firsthand experience of the
country's recent years of instability, high inflation,
pandemic, tense international relationships,
elections, and economic, social, and geopolitical
crises, [21]. Examining Twitter data can help
ministries gain a better understanding of how the
public feels about these events, identify sensitive
information, pinpoint areas of public concern, and
gauge general sentiment. By doing so, the ministries
can take prompt and effective action to offer
emotional support, particularly in today's turbulent
environment.
The proposed framework provides valuable
insights that ministries can use to develop plans for
government action. By continuously tracking public
opinion, ministries can identify evolving trends and
handle problems before they become crises.
Acknowledgment of public sentiment and its
inclusion into the decision-making process could
strengthen the relationship of ministries with
citizens, deepen democracy, and create more stable
societies.
6 Limitations and Suggestions for
Further Research
The study has some limitations that could be
addressed in future research. Firstly, the
examination of the ministries was limited to a short
timeframe, which may limit the generalizability of
the findings. To overcome this limitation, future
research could choose data samples with a broader
time horizon, allowing for a more comprehensive
understanding of the use of Twitter by ministries.
Secondly, the study was limited to the Greek
ministries, which may restrict the applicability of
the findings to countries with severely different
political, social, or communicational contexts. To
address this limitation, future research could include
public institutions and ministries from these
countries, facilitating comparative research that
could provide more extensive insights.
Thirdly, the study focused solely on political
Twitter exchanges, and it would be interesting to
expand the scope to include other public
organizations at the municipality or community
level. Additionally, studying how organizations
from other countries use Twitter to engage with
their stakeholders could provide insights into cross-
cultural differences in the use of Twitter.
Finally, replication of the proposed framework
could be beneficial in advancing the under-studied
topic of ministries on Twitter. This could help
improve the proposed framework and provide
further insights into how ministries use Twitter for
public engagement.
References:
[1] Edgerly, S., Thorson, K., Bighash, L., &
Hannah, M., Posting about politics: Media as
resources for political expression on
Facebook, Journal of Information Technology
& Politics, Vol 13, No. 2, 2016, pp. 108125.
[2] Bossetta, M., The digital architectures of
social media: Comparing political
campaigning on Facebook, Twitter,
Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US
election, Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, Vol. 95, No.2, 2018, pp. 471-496
[3] Quintana, A., Urquía-Grande,E. & Jalón, M.,
Strategic Conceptual Theories and Sustainable
Cooperation Among Stakeholders in E-
government, E-participation, and Social
Media, Central European Journal of Public
Policy, Vol 16, No 2, 2022, pp.46-63.
[4] Gonçalves, G., Political Communication. In
R. L. Heath & W. Johansen (Eds.), The
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
288
Volume 20, 2023
International Encyclopedia of Strategic
Communication, pp. 1-9, Wiley, 2018.
[5] Eldridge II, S. A., García-Carretero, L., &
Broersma, M., Disintermediation in Social
Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’
Construction of Publics on Twitter, Media
and Communication, Vol. 7, No.1, 2019, pp.
271285.
[6] McCormick, T. H., Lee, H., Cesare, N.,
Shojaie, A., & Spiro, E. S., Using Twitter for
demographic and social science research:
Tools for data collection and processing.
Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 46,
No. 3, 2017, pp. 390-421.
[7] Kydros, D., Argyropoulou, M., & Vrana, V.,
A content and sentiment analysis of Greek
tweets during the pandemic, Sustainability,
Vol.13, No. 11, 2021, Article 6150.
[8] Kydros, D., & Vrana, V. Vaccination Talks on
Twitter. Semantic Social Networks and Public
Views From Greece, WSEAS Transactions on
Information Science and Applications, Vol.
19, 2022, pp. 44-53.
[9] Graham, T., Talking politics online within
spaces of popular culture: The case of the Big
Brother forum, Javnost-The Public: Journal
of the European Institute for Communication
and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2010, pp. 25-42.
[10] Ridout, T. N., Fowler, E. F., Branstetter, J., &
Borah, P., Politics as Usual? When and Why
Traditional Actors Often Dominate YouTube
Campaigning, Journal of Information
Technology & Politics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2015,
pp. 237251.
[11] Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., & Nabeth, T.,
Social media in organizations: leveraging
personal and collective knowledge processes,
Journal of Organizational Computing and
Electronic Commerce, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2014,
pp. 74-93.
[12] DiStaso, M. W., McCorkindale, T., & Wright,
D. K., How public relations executives
perceive and measure the impact of social
media in their organizations, Public Relations
Review, Vol.37, No. 3, 2011, pp. 325-328.
[13] McCorriston, J., Jurgens, D., & Ruths, D.,
Organizations are users too: Characterizing
and detecting the presence of organizations on
Twitter, In Proceedings of the International
AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media,
Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015, pp. 650-653.
[14] Leone, S., Delli Paoli, A., & Senatore, D.,
Social media communication in central
governments: The case of Twitter activity of
Italian ministries. Journal of Communication
Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2015, pp. 413429.
[15] Okay, A., Gole, P. A., & Okay, A., Turkish
and Slovenian health ministries' use of
Twitter: A comparative analysis. Corporate
Communications: An International Journal,
Vol. 26, No. 1, 2020, pp.176-191
[16] Vrana, V., Kydros, D., Kotzaivazoglou, I., &
Pechlivanaki, I., EU Citizens’ Twitter
Discussions of the 202223 Energy Crisis: A
Content and Sentiment Analysis on the Verge
of a Daunting Winter, Sustainability, Vol. 15,
No. 2, 2023, Article 1322.
[17] Antoniadis, K., Zafiropoulos, K., & Vrana,
V., Community characteristics of Twitter
followers in EU-countries governmental
accounts, International Journal of Electronic
Governance, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2016, pp. 283-
302.
[18] Taşkıran, H. B., Government public relations
in Turkey: social media usage of Turkish
ministries in relationship building. Online
Journal of Communication and Media
Technologies, Vol. 6, No.1, 2017, pp. 48-63
[19] Sedlačko, M. & Staroňová, K., Internal
ministerial advisory bodies: An attempt to
transform governing in the Slovak Republic.
Central European Journal of Public Policy,
Vol.12, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-16.
[20] Kemp, S., Digital 2022: Greece. Datareportal.
(2022, February 15), https://datareportal.
com/reports/digital-2022-greece
[21] Islm, T., Meng, H., Pitafi, A. H., Ullah Zafar,
A., Sheikh, Z., Shujaat Mubarik, M., & Liang,
X., Why DO citizens engage in government
social media accounts during COVID-19
pandemic? A comparative study, Telematics
and Informatics, Vol. 62, 2021, Article
101619.
[22] Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (Eds.),
Order on the Edge of Chaos: Social
Psychology and the Problem of Social Order,
Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[23] Sedlačko, M. & Staroňová, K., From
Knowledge Utilization to Building
Knowledge Networks, Central European
Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2016,
pp. 4-6.
[24] Giachanou, A., & Crestani, F., Like It or Not:
A Survey of Twitter Sentiment Analysis
Methods, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 49,
No. 2, 2016, pp. 141.
[25] Colliander, J., Dahlén, M., & Modig, E.,
Twitter for two: Investigating the effects of
dialogue with customers in social media.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
289
Volume 20, 2023
International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 34,
No. 2, 2015, pp. 181-194.
[26] Saffer, A. J., Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Taylor,
M., The effects of organizational Twitter
interactivity on organizationpublic
relationships. Public Relations Review, Vol.
39, No. 3, 2013, pp. 213-215.
[27] Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I.,
Marketing 4.0: Moving from traditional to
digital, Wiley, 2017.
[28] Joos, K. Convincing political stakeholders:
Successful lobbying through process
competence in the complex decision-making
system of the European Union, Wiley, 2016.
[29] Wang, Y., & Yang, Y., Dialogic
communication on social media: How
organizations use Twitter to build dialogic
relationships with their publics. Computers in
Human Behavior, Vol. 104, 2020, pp. 1-8.
[30] Culnan, M. J., McHugh, P. J., & Zubillaga, J.
I., How large US companies can use Twitter
and other social media to gain business value,
MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2010,
pp. 243-259.
[31] Armstrong, C. L., & Gao, F., Now tweet this:
How news organizations use Twitter,
Electronic News, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2010, pp. 218-
235.
[32] Wang, Y., US State education agencies’ use
of Twitter: Mission accomplished?, Sage
Open, Vol. 6, No.1, 2016, pp.1-12.
[33] Collins, M., & Karami, A., Social media
analysis for organizations: Us northeastern
public and state libraries case study. In
Proceedings of the Southern Association for
Information Systems (SAIS), pp. 1-5, 2018.
[34] Kydros, D., Vrana, V., & Kehris, E., Social
networks, politics and public views: an
analysis of the term “Macedonia” in Twitter,
Social Networking, Vol. 8, 2019, pp. 1-8.
[35] Kydros, D., Twitting bad rumours - The grexit
case International Journal of Web Based
Communities, Vol. 14, No.1, 2018, Article 4.
[36] Borah, A., & Singh, S. R., Investigating
political polarization in India through the lens
of Twitter. Social Network Analysis and
Mining, Vol.12, No.1, 2022, pp. 1-26.
[37] Rahmat, A.F. & Rafi, M., Social Media
Network Analysis on Twitter Users Network
to the Pension Plan Policy, Communicare:
Journal of Communication Studies, Vol. 9,
No. 1, 2022, pp. 62-76.
[38] Recuero, R., Zago, G., & Soares, F., Using
social network analysis and social capital to
identify user roles on polarized political
conversations on Twitter, Social Media+
Society, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, Article:
2056305119848745.
[39] Casero-Ripollés, A., Influencers in the
political conversation on Twitter: Identifying
digital authority with big data, Sustainability,
Vol.13, No. 5, 2021, Article: 2851.
[40] Choy, M., Cheong, M. L., Laik, M. N., &
Shung, K. P., A sentiment analysis of
Singapore Presidential Election 2011 using
Twitter data with census correction. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1108.5520, 2011.
[41] Choy, M. J., Cheong, M. L. F., Ma, N. L., &
Koo, P. S., A Sentiment Analysis of
Singapore Presidential Election 2011 using
Twitter Data with Census Correction. (2012).
Research Collection School of Information
Systems, 2020.
[42] Mishra, P., Rajnish, R., & Kumar, P.,
Sentiment analysis of Twitter data: Case study
on digital India. In 2016 International
Conference on Information Technology
(InCITe)-The Next Generation IT Summit on
the Theme-Internet of Things: Connect your
Worlds, pp. 148-153. IEEE. October, 2016.
[43] Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F.,
& Narayanan, S., A system for real-time
twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 us
presidential election cycle. In Proceedings of
the ACL 2012 system demonstrations, pp.
115-120, July 2012.
[44] Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M.,
New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of
Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch
general election campaigns, New media &
society, Vol. 18, No.5, 2016, pp. 765-783.
[45] Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H., Studying political
microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010
Swedish election campaign, New media &
society, Vol.14, No. 5, 2012, pp. 729-747.
[46] Kušen, E., & Strembeck, M., Politics,
sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis
of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian
Presidential Elections. Online Social
Networks and Media, Vol. 5, 2018, pp. 37-50.
[47] Jain, A. P., & Dandannavar, P., Text analytics
framework using Apache spark and
combination of lexical and machine learning
techniques, Journal of Applied Information
Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2016, pp. 31-36.
[48] Ansari, M. Z., Aziz, M. B., Siddiqui, M. O.,
Mehra, H., & Singh, K. P., Analysis of
political sentiment orientations on twitter,
Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 167, 2020,
pp. 1821-1828.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
290
Volume 20, 2023
[49] Chaudhry, H. N., Javed, Y., Kulsoom, F.,
Mehmood, Z., Khan, Z. I., Shoaib, U., &
Janjua, S. H., Sentiment analysis of before
and after elections: Twitter data of US
election 2020, Electronics, Vol. 10, No. 17,
2021, Article: 2082.
[50] Panizo-LLedot, A., Torregrosa, J., Bello-
Orgaz, G., Thorburn, J., & Camacho, D.,
Describing alt-right communities and their
discourse on twitter during the 2018 us mid-
term elections. In International conference on
complex networks and their applications, pp.
427-439, Springer, Cham, December 2019.
[51] Jaki, S., & De Smedt, T., Right-wing German
hate speech on Twitter: Analysis and
automatic detection, arXiv preprint
arXiv:1910.07518, 2019.
[52] Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Casero-Ripollés, A.,
Communication of European populist leaders
on Twitter: Agenda setting and the ‘more is
less’ effect. El profesional de la información,
Vol. 27, No. 6, 2018, pp. 1193-1202.
[53] Dwianto, R. A., Nurmandi, A., & Salahudin,
S., The Sentiments Analysis of Donald Trump
and Jokowi's Twitters on Covid-19 Policy
Dissemination. Webology, Vol.18, No. 1,
2021, pp. 389-405.
[54] Lucić, D., Katalinić, J., & Dokman, T.,
Sentiment Analysis of the Syrian Conflict on
Twitter. Media Studies, Vol.11, No. 22, 2020,
pp. 46-61.
[55] Putraa, F. M., & Santiyasaa, I. W., Sentiment
Analysis of the Indonesian Health Ministry
Performance in Covid-19 Crisis using Support
Vector Machine (SVM), Jurnal Elektronik
Ilmu Komputer Udayana p-ISSN, 2301, 2021,
Article 5373
[56] Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M.
A., Analyzing social media networks with
NodeXL: Insights from a connected world,
Morgan Kaufmann, 2010.
[57] Danowski, J. A. Social media network size
and semantic networks for collaboration in
design. International Journal of
Organisational Design and Engineering, Vol.
2, No.4, 2012, p.343-361.
[58] Popping, R., Computer-assisted text analysis,
Sage Publications, 2000.
[59] Tsakalidis, A., Papadopoulos, S., Voskaki, R.,
Ioannidou, K., Boididou, C., Cristea, A. I.,
Liakata, M., & Kompatsiaris, Y., Building and
evaluating resources for sentiment analysis in
the Greek language. Language Resources and
Evaluation, Vol. 52, No.4, 2018, pp. 1021
1044.
[60] Alshaabi, T., Dewhurst, D. R., Minot, J. R.,
Arnold, M. V., Adams, J. L., Danforth, C. M.,
& Dodds, P. S., The growing amplification of
social media: Measuring temporal and social
contagion dynamics for over 150 languages
on Twitter for 20092020, EPJ Data Science,
Vol. 10, No.1, 2021, Article: 15.
[61] Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P., NRC Word-
Emotion Association Lexicon (aka EmoLex).
Saifmohammad, https://saifmohammad.comn/
WebPages/NRC-Emotion-Lexicon.htm, 2022.
[62] Babalioutas, L., Reforms of Staffing in
Primary and Secondary Education in Greece,
In L. Babalioutas, Oxford Research
Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford
University Press, 2020.
[63] Tsakiris, T., Greece and the energy
geopolitics of the Eastern Mediterranean. LSE
IDEAS. 2014.
[64] Zeri, P., Tsekeris, C., & Tsekeris, T.,
Investigating the Macedonia Naming Dispute
in the Twitter Era: Implications for the Greek
Identity Crisis. Hellenic Observatory
Discussion Papers, 2018, Article: 127.
[65] Mehrl, M., & Choulis, I., Diversionary
Politics and Territorial Disputes: Evidence
from Turkish Airspace Incursions. Foreign
Policy Analysis, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2021, Article:
orab007.
[66] Ministry of Climate Crisis and Civil
Protection, Mission, 2022,
https://www.civilprotection.gr/ el/apostolic
[67] Tsounis, A., Sarafis, P., & D. Bamidis, P.,
Motivation among Physicians in Greek Public
Health-Care Sector, British Journal of
Medicine and Medical Research, Vol. 4, No.
5, 2014, pp. 10941105.
[68] Gazi, A., Museums and national cultural
property II. The Parthenon marbles, Museum
Management and Curatorship, Vol. 9, No. 3,
1990, pp. 241255.
[69] Toriumi, F., Sakaki, T., Shinoda, K., Kazama,
K., Kurihara, S., & Noda, I., Information
sharing on Twitter during the 2011
catastrophic earthquake, In Proceedings of the
22nd International Conference on World
Wide Web, pp. 1025-1028, May, 2013.
[70] Rosalia, F., Yulianto, Y., Kartika, T.,
Wulandari, J., & Maydiantoro, A., A
Network of Twitter User on Stunting Issue in
Lampung, Indonesia, WSEAS Transactions on
environment and development, Vol. 18, 2022,
pp. 1259-1266.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
291
Volume 20, 2023
[71] Wasserman, S., & Faust, K., Social network
analysis: Methods and applications,
Cambridge University Press,1994.
[72] Antonakopoulou, S., & Veglis, A., Twitter
engagement in media organizations: The case
of the Greek National Broadcasting
Corporation, Journalism and Media, Vol. 3,
No.1, 2022, pp. 66-80.
[73] Wojcik, S., & Hughes, A. Sizing up Twitter
users. PEW Research Center, Vol. 24, 2019,
pp. 1-23.
[74] Culmer, K., & Uhlmann, J., Examining
LDA2Vec and Tweet Pooling for Topic
Modeling on Twitter Data. WSEAS
Transactions on Information Science and
Applications, Vol. 18, 2021, pp. 102-115.
[75] Wang, X., Ow, T. T., Liu, L., Feng, Y., &
Liang, Y., Effects of peers and network
position on user participation in a firm-hosted
software community: the moderating role of
network centrality, European Journal of
Information Systems, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2020, pp.
521-544
[76] Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., &
Himelboim, I. Mapping Twitter topic
networks: From polarized crowds to
community clusters, PEW research center,
2014,
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02
/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-
polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/
[77] Boatwright, B. C., Exploring online opinion
leadership in the network paradigm: an
analysis of influential users on Twitter
shaping conversations around anthem protests
by prominent athletes, Public Relations
Review, Vol. 48, No, 4, 2022, 102229.
[78] Matsuoka, M., The role of informal political
actors in Japanese security policymaking: the
case of Kitaoka Shin’ichi, Australian Journal
of International Affairs, Vol. 74, No.6, 2020,
pp. 670-686.
[79] Arunachalam, R., & Sarkar, S., The new eye
of government: Citizen sentiment analysis in
social media. In Proceedings of the IJCNLP
2013 workshop on natural language
processing for social media (SocialNLP), pp.
23-28, October, 2013.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
- Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou and Ioanna Pechlivanaki
carried out Conceptualization.
- Dimitrios Kydros is responsible for data curation.
- Dimitrios Kydros and Ioanna Pechlivanaki carried
out data curation and implemented formal
analysis, methodology, and visualization.
- Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou, Ioanna Pechlivanaki
Dimitrios Kydros, and Vasiliki Vrana were
responsible for writing - the original draft and
writing - review & editing.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.31
Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou,
Ioanna Pechlivanaki,
Dimitrios Kydros, Vasiliki Vrana
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
292
Volume 20, 2023