Application 3D Forensic Science in a Criminal Investigation
IRENA DROFOVA, MILAN ADAMEK, PAVEL STOKLASEK, MARTIN FICEK,
JAN VALOUCH
Faculty of Applied Informatics,
Tomas Bata University in Zlin,
Nad Stranemi 4511, Zlin 760 05,
CZECH REPUBLIC
Abstract: - This manuscript discusses the modern approach and application of 3D digital imaging in forensic
science. It presents the basic principles and approaches of 3D modeling methods. Selected methods of image
capture and its subsequent processing into a 3D model are applied to a specific object. This object is captured
by a mobile phone camera, a LiDar sensor, and a 3D scanner for further image processing for different desired
image outputs. The text describes the photogrammetry method, the workflow with the LiDar sensor, and the 3D
model of the object intended for 3D printing. The paper discusses the potential of the selected methods and
their application in forensic sciences.
Key-Words: - forensic science, criminal investigation, 3D model, photogrammetry, LiDar sensor, 3D print
Received: April 28, 2022. Revised: January 12, 2023. Accepted: February 7, 2023. Published: March 2, 2023.
1 Introduction
Modern digital methods of displaying objects and
scenes find application in many fields. Digital image
data capture reality or faithfully create a new reality.
3D modeling methods are currently commonly
encountered in many commercial and scientific
fields. 3D visualization and virtual and augmented
reality (VR/AR) are used today in music, [1],
architecture, [2], art, [3], medicine, [4], forensics
science, [5], advertising, military, industrial design,
and agriculture, for capturing and digitizing cultural
heritage and forgeries. Many methods of 3D
modeling and visualization find their application
across the fields of human activity.
Modern procedures and methods of 2D and 3D
visualization are also applied in criminology and
forensic sciences, [6]. Currently, 3D reconstructions
of objects are used in courts, [7]. Investigators use
them to support evidence from the crime scene and
are also used in expert opinions. Thus, a specific
branch of forensic science emerged: 3D forensic
science (3DFS), [8]. This new field provides new
perspectives in forensic art and technology. 3D
scanning methods and visualization can faithfully
reconstruct the appearance of the victim of a crime,
the crime scene, and the evidence found at that
location, [9]. 3DFS can also be used for the
reconstruction of historical image 2D data. It is
essential to mention that this is a virtual
representation of the data; therefore, the outputs
from the 3DFS methods are only supplementary in
case of investigation. Nevertheless, the use of 3DFS
methods is also in great demand in court
proceedings. The created 3D objects are used for
display on court monitors and for creating a
database of evidence in criminal proceedings, [8].
The issue of 3DFS connects many fields. These
are mainly computer graphics, computer vision,
machine learning, image capture and display, and
other scientific disciplines. The output can be a
virtual digital image for display on screens or in
virtual and augmented reality. Image data can be
used for 3D printing, [10]. Selective image capture
and image data processing procedures are chosen
depending on the type of output. Individual
procedures differ slightly, especially for the display
of material and its accurate, realistic display.
Reconstruction of metallic materials with a high
gloss level tends to be problematic. Structured
materials also often require an individual approach
when processing image data, [11]. Therefore, when
investigating a crime and securing evidence using
3DFS, emphasis is placed on optimizing the entire
process and speed of managing input image data.
This manuscript presents selected basic methods
of 3D reconstruction of a real object for 3D
visualization and obtaining a virtual model for 3D
printing purposes. The experiment uses the method
of photogrammetry and 3D scanning. The
experiment's goal is to rapidly process image data
into a 3D model for further use based on the
required outputs. A smartphone is used in this
experiment. These devices are currently equipped
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.8
Irena Drofova, Milan Adamek,
Pavel Stoklasek, Martin Ficek,
Jan Valouch
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
59
Volume 20, 2023
with a standard camera for obtaining high-quality
photos. The object scanned by the smartphone was
transformed into a 3D model using the
photogrammetry method. Next, a LiDar sensor was
used to capture the same object. This sensor was
part of only highly professional and costly devices
in the past. Currently, it has reached the higher class
of tablets for ordinary users. These two devices can
replace classic cameras and streamline the work of
technicians and processing image data from the
crime scene. The object was then scanned with a
scanner for 3D printing output. Here, high and
accurate quality of the reproduction of the details of
the object's defects is assumed. This work aims to
demonstrate the contribution of new modern devices
and their application in criminalistics. Especially at
the crime scene as a tool to secure evidence and
quickly transform it into a digital 3D environment.
2 3DFS Methods and Procedures
This chapter presents the basic 3DFS methods and
procedures for obtaining a 3D model of an object.
The object for 3D reconstruction is the spent charge.
The object is made of plastic and metal, with a relief
marking the charge. The experimentally created
models are presented in the following chapters.
2.1 Image Capture
Several imaging devices were used in this
experiment. The following devices were used to
obtain a digital image for the subsequent
reconstruction of the object using the
photogrammetry method:
• Cubot X30 mobile phone
• iPad 11 Pro with LiDar sensor
To 3D model for subsequent output in the model to
3D printing, the following equipment was used:
• 3D scanner Atos Triplescan II 5M / GOM
It is clear from the listed image capture devices that
these are three different devices. In the case of a
mobile phone and tablet with a LiDar scanning
function, it is possible to easily create data for
output through 3D printing. Acquiring a 3D model
with an Atos scanner and transforming it into a 3D
color model is complicated by the absence of color
in the base 3D model.
2.1.1 Photogrammetry Method
This method was applied and perfected already at
the time of analog image processing. With the
development of digitization, this method finds other,
more comprehensive applications. That is a method
that is not demanding in the requirements of the
sensing device.
In this experiment, the method of multi-frame
ground photogrammetry was used. The principle of
this method is to calculate the object's location in
3D space based on the description of the
information obtained from individual images of the
object. The algorithm finds a common point based
on triangulation. It then calculates the individual
positions of the sensing device around the scanned
object. By subsequent calculation of the point cloud,
each point gets its own x, y, z coordinate and thus
defines the basic information about the position,
size, and geometry of the object located in 3D
space, [12]. The following Figure 1 shows the basic
point cloud and the position of individual points in
3D space. Figure 1 shows the basic shape of the
reconstructed object, and at this stage of the process,
it is ready for further processing into a 3D model.
Fig. 1: The basic principle of the photogrammetry
method.
2.1.2 LiDar Technology
This technology has been used since the 1960s.
LiDar (Light Detection and Ranging) is a standard
sensor nowadays. However, not all capturing
devices have it yet. Only the latest Apple devices
use LiDar technology, which is available to the
average user today. As the technology has advanced
over the years, LiDar has been used by many other
experts and scientists in agriculture, archaeology,
automation, mapping, and scientific fields. Use of
this technology, it is possible to determine the
distance between objects in space. LiDar also
enables a 3D representation of space and objects in
it, [13], [14].
In the experiment presented in this manuscript,
the emphasis is on the specific object and the quality
of the generated actual 3D model.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.8
Irena Drofova, Milan Adamek,
Pavel Stoklasek, Martin Ficek,
Jan Valouch
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
60
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 2: The 3D object visualization using LiDar
technology.
Figure 2 shows the experimental 3DFS imaging
of an object by LiDar technology. This method of
displaying scanned data is described in more detail
in the chapter presenting the experimental results of
selected 3DFS methods.
The obtained image data from the sensing
mentioned above devices were subsequently
processed in the professional 3D modeling software
Agisoft Metashape Professional, [15]. The object
was photographed indoors with standard cold light
discharge lighting. Figure 2 shows the shine of the
wooden material on which the object was
photographed. In this case, however, the scanned
material is of a larger display of the metal part. The
degree of its shine is due to the lighting of the space
and its surroundings.
Approaches for processing the materials of a real
object into a 3D model currently represent
challenges in image processing. Especially since
each material has different surface properties, these
properties can also be seen in the environment
where the object artifacts are manipulated and
behaved. In the new case studies, the procedures
involve the use of CAD 3D models, which can lead
to incorrect simulation results. New alternative
methods are thus created to generate the most
accurate 3D models with retopological procedures
to simplify the model for further processing. These
procedures find application in digitization and 3D
modeling of large objects, [16].
2.1.3 Capture an Image for 3D Printing an
Object
The method for capturing and processing the image
for 3D printing is different in this experiment, [17].
A 3D scanner Atos Triplescan II 5M / GOM was
used to obtain a virtual 3D model of the object.
Figure 3 shows the resulting 3D model of the object.
Fig. 3: The 3D object model intended for 3D
printing.
In this case, the 3D model of the object is
scanned without the ability to define the object's
colors. That is a 3D model intended for 3D printing;
there is no information about the primary colors of
an object.
3 Experimental Results of 3DFS
In this experiment, a small object was chosen in the
form of a spent charge. The deformation of its shape
characterizes this object due to shooting. The
object's material is plastic with a black description
and metal with an engraved marking. In the 3D
modeling process, the influence of the shine from
the metallic material on the process display is
assumed. This effect is due to the cool discharge
light in the room. The object and the effect of light
can be seen in Figure 4.
Fig. 4: An object intended for 3DFS display.
3.1 3DFS Imaging Process
The hands-on experiment that this manuscript
describes is based on the sensing of several types of
sensing devices. A 3D scanner, a mobile phone
camera, and a tablet with a LiDar sensor are used.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.8
Irena Drofova, Milan Adamek,
Pavel Stoklasek, Martin Ficek,
Jan Valouch
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
61
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 5: The 3DFS basic methods image processing.
All the mentioned types of sensing devices
require a different approach for capturing turnover
data and image processing for the final output. The
possibilities in the field of 3DFS are very extensive.
Figure 5 describes the basic procedures of image
data processing by individual input devices for
obtaining image data.Figure 5 describes the image
processing process of individual scanning devices.
Images captured by a mobile phone and processed
using photogrammetry have six basic steps. The first
step is to generate a point cloud from captured
photos and then process it into a 3D dense cloud
model. After this image processing, a 3D network
model can be created. This model provides the basis
for generating a solid, shadow, or textured 3D
model. The type of 3D model is chosen according to
the desired final output. The 3D model created in
this way can be transformed into a virtual reality
environment or for 3D printing.
By using a scanning device with a LiDar sensor,
some image processing steps can be omitted.
Although it is possible to generate point clouds in
some applications, in the case of the application
used in this study, a 3D polygonal mesh was
generated from a direct textured 3D model. The next
step is to generate a 3D model for the desired
output. This procedure significantly reduces the
time for creating a 3D model of an object without
using high-performance computing equipment.
The third type of 3D model discussed in this text
is an object model created by a 3D scanner to apply
the output to a 3D object by 3D print. This
procedure is swift. That is practically a direct route.
The disadvantage is the generated 3D model without
textures and colors, as seen in Figures 3 and 8. This
problem can be solved by creating a custom color
texture model to the 3D model if the goal is a 3D
digital model applied in a digital, online, or virtual
environment. A 3D model created by 3D printing
can then be created manually with a colored texture.
However, this procedure is time-consuming and
requires skill.
In the next chapter, individual 3D models are
visually compared.
3.2 The 3D Forensic Imaging Process
Visualizations of individual types of 3D models and
final models with texture are in the following
images.
3.2.1 The 3D Model by Photogrammetry
Method
A mobile phone with a camera, which was used to
create a 3D model using the photogrammetry
method, is a commonly available device. A
significant advantage is the speed of use in the case
of photography. It is possible that taking pictures in
the dark can be difficult when most current cameras
on mobile phones do not have a flash of sufficient
quality. In this experiment, 47 images were used for
the 3D modeling of the object using the
photogrammetry method. Figure 6 shows the 3D
processing of an object image into outputs obtained
by photogrammetry for forensic investigation.
a) b) c) d)
e) f) g) h)
Fig. 6: 3DFS model of the object by
photogrammetry method: a) 3D model of the
primary point cloud, b) addition of points in the
form of a dense cloud model, c) 3D object model
wireframe, d) resulting 3D model with material
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.8
Irena Drofova, Milan Adamek,
Pavel Stoklasek, Martin Ficek,
Jan Valouch
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
62
Volume 20, 2023
texture, e)-h) detail the 3D model of the metal part
of the object in the same image processing
procedure.
As can be seen from Figure 6, the
photogrammetry method is suitable for modeling
this object. It is more time-consuming for the entire
process and the quality requirements of all images
from which the model is created. However, the great
advantage of this method appears to be the
possibility of editing image information already in
the first two stages of image processing, Figure 6 a),
b), e), f). When this method is applied correctly, the
3D model of the metal part of the object can be
successfully modeled, as seen in Figure 6 h).
3.2.2 The 3D Model using by LiDar Sensor
A tablet with a LiDar function provides a primary
image. That function allows us to work with both
video formats and photos; both outputs can also be
combined. The photos taken can be modeled using
the photogrammetry method. It is also possible to
determine the captured video into individual
sequences and photographs. In this experiment, the
entire image was acquired in one step.
The freely available Scaniverse Pro application
was used in this experiment. This application
enables the direct transformation of the scanned
object into a 3D wireframe model. However, it does
not allow working with the model in the form of
point clouds. The scanned model was exported to
the professional modeling software Agisoft
Metashape Professional to compare the created 3D
object with the 3D object created by the
photogrammetry method.
a) b) c)
Fig. 7: The 3DFS model of the object by LiDar
sensor: a) 3D wireframe model, b) 3D model with
material texture, e) and d) detail of the 3D model of
the metal part of the object.
From the set of images 6 and 7, it can be seen
that different sensors of the sensing devices also
provide a different result in the final display of the
3D model of the object. Differences are also visible
in the polygonal network density (wireframe)
connecting individual points in the object. In Figure
7 a), it is seen that the 3D wireframe model contains
a significantly higher density of polygonal mesh
structure. With this phenomenon, the requirements
for the capacity of computing technology in image
processing and final display in a virtual environment
also grow.
3.2.3 The 3D Object Model for 3D Print
This process of capturing the image for the final 3D
model is different from the previous two cases of
3D modeling. A 3D scanner scans an object with
higher accuracy but without information about the
color and structure of the object. Currently, 3D
printing cannot work with this attribute. As Figures
3 and 8 shows, the shape of the 3D model for the
final print output contains a minimum of defects.
However, the difference in the materials of the
object is not noticeable.
Fig. 8: Detail of the 3D object model intended for
3D printing.
The advantage of the 3D printed model is the
detailed capture of the deformation of the cartridge
case material. The metal part of the object and its
relief are also clearly visible. In a forensic
investigation, these models can simulate the original
object to find another fact when analyzing the
evidence. In this digital 3D model, the deformation
of the material due to mechanical damage to the
object can be marked in more detail during further
image processing. These procedures can be applied
to the digital archiving of evidence. The
disadvantage is losing image information about
color, material, and texture.
4 Discussion
Modern procedures in the area of forensic science,
but also in many other scientific fields, require the
flexibility of approach and solving given problems.
Especially in the progressive, dynamic pace of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.8
Irena Drofova, Milan Adamek,
Pavel Stoklasek, Martin Ficek,
Jan Valouch
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
63
Volume 20, 2023
digitization and work with acquired information and
data.
The details that lead to a successful solution are
often crucial in criminal investigations, trials, and
expert opinions. Modern forensic art today works
with a wide variety of tools and procedures. A 3D
forensic science (3DFS) currently has a rather
complementary character. The created 3D models
must be understood as a secondary tool designed to
present and demonstrate given facts. The created
models cannot be perceived as a primary means of
evidence because they are a virtual representation of
the natural environment, object, or evidence. These
models do not have a physical character, and neither
do 3D printing reproductions of the object are not
objective facts. Nevertheless, this discipline can
significantly help in an investigation or a criminal
case.
In the experiment described in this manuscript,
there are several procedures for quickly and
efficiently creating a 3D model of an object. The
applied methods in this work can be considered fast
in securing evidence at the crime scene.
Nevertheless, the appropriate choice of the 3DFS
method depends on the desired output. Therefore, it
is necessary to approach them individually
depending on the purpose of their use. The choice of
the capture device, image processing, and final
output depends on the environment where the image
data is captured.
The object that is the subject of this experiment
is made of two materials and structures. As seen in
the set of figures 6 and 7, there is a material with a
high degree of variable physical-optical properties
in this subject. Generally, difficult materials and
structures for 3D modeling are, for example, metals,
glass, liquids, and gels. These are materials with
variable properties due to the influence of light,
temperature, weather conditions, and other
phenomena affecting the objects' shape, structure,
and material.
5 Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be stated that optimizing the
entire process of creating a 3D model or
environment is not simple and hides many
challenges for further research into 3D imaging of
natural objects or environments, especially
concerning the large quantities of problems that
occur in the entire image processing process. There
are significant potential and challenges for the
future in the field of forensic science hidden in this
issue. One can consider a very high degree of
application of machine learning within the
framework of image segmentation and other
computer and color vision methods.
Applying and using 3DFS in crime scene
investigations makes it possible to work with
evidence on a completely different scale. As a
complementary tool, 3DFS presents new challenges
in forensics. Simultaneously with the progressive
development of new technologies and devices, the
process of creating 3D models of objects or
environments can also be significantly shortened.
This trend is currently represented by commercial
devices that include the LiDar sensor. These devices
are affordable, easily portable, and easy to operate.
The scanning devices contain a high-quality camera
and a scanning sensor. Image acquisition and
processing are faster and easier than using classic
single-lens reflex cameras (DSLR) or mobile
devices without LiDar sensors. When reconstructing
an image from these devices using the
photogrammetry method, not only a large capacity
of external storage and high performance of
computing devices but also a significant time fund
for 3D reconstruction is required. Mobile devices
with the LiDar function represent a technology
where it is possible to eliminate some of the steps of
the image processing process and export the
resulting 3D model. A significant advantage is also
that it takes less time. However, it is also necessary
to consider the resulting quality of the 3D model for
the desired output. Therefore, further image
processing on a powerful computing device is not
entirely omitted. However, that technology fulfills
everything required by the photogrammetry method.
And for reconstructing a 3D object for output to a
3D printer too.
It can be stated that a device with a LiDar
sensor can, in some cases, replace entirely both
classic cameras, a mobile phone, and the mentioned
3D scanner. Nevertheless, this technology presents
additional challenges in sensor research, sensing
devices, and image processing. All these aspects
will be considered in further research in the 3D
reconstruction of objects in the field of 3DFS.
Attention will be focused mainly on working with
point clouds and 3D reconstruction of more
complex natural objects. Here, emphasis will be
placed on the processing of the object's realistic
colors, materials, and textures and its transformation
into a 3D and VR environment for use in forensic
science.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.8
Irena Drofova, Milan Adamek,
Pavel Stoklasek, Martin Ficek,
Jan Valouch
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
64
Volume 20, 2023
References:
[1] Bialkova S., Van Gisbergen M.S., When
sound modulates vision: VR applications for
art and entertainment, IEEE 3rd Workshop on
Everyday Virtual Reality (WEVR), 2017, pp.
1-6, doi: 10.1109/WEVR.2017.7957714.
[2] Middleton W., Shu Q., Ludwig F.,
Representing living architecture through
skeleton reconstruction from point clouds,
Scientific Reports, 12., 2022,
doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05194-y.
[3] Gultepe, E., Edward. Conturo, T., Makrehchi,
M., Predicting and grouping digitized
paintings by style using unsupervised feature
learning, Journal of Cultural Heritage 31, 13
23, 2018 doi.:10.1016/j.culher.2017.11.008.
[4] Selivanova and col., 3D visualization of
human body internal structures surface during
stereo-endoscopic operations using computer
vision techniques, Przegląd
Elektrotechniczny, ISSN 0033-2097, 97, nr. 9,
30-33, 2021, doi:10.15199/48.2021.09.06.
[5] Huskova V., Adamova V., Boc K., Use of 3D
Screening Technology Traks in the Process
Criminal Identification (SK), 2021, Young
Science Conference 2021, Tomas Bata
University in Zlin, Faculty of Applied
Informatics, Trilobit, 2021, [online].
[6] Min Zhang, Forensic Imaging: A Powerful
Tool in Modern Forensic
Investigation, Forensic Sciences Research,
Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp. 385392,
2022, doi.:10.1080/20961790.2021.2008705.
[7] Errickson, D., Fawcett, H., Thompson, T.J.U.,
Campbell, A., The effect of different imaging
techniques for the visualisation of evidence in
court on jury comprehension, International
Journal of Legal Medicine 134, 2020,
doi:10.1007/s00414-019-02221-y.
[8] Carew R. M., James French J., Morgan R. M.,
3D forensic science: A new field integrating
3D imaging and 3D printing in crime
reconstruction, Forensic Science
International: Synergy, Vol. 3, 2021, ISSN
2589-871X.
[9] Wilkinson C., Neave R., Skull re-assembly
and the implications for forensic facial
reconstruction, Science & Justice, Vol. 41,
Issue 3, p. 233-234, ISSN 1355-0306, 2001,
doi.:10.1016/S1355-0306(01)71902-8.
[10] Yamasaki T., Toba S., Sanders S. P., Carreon
Ch. K.,Perfusion-distention fixation of heart
specimens: a key step in immortalizing heart
specimens for wax infiltration and generating
3D imaging data sets for reconstruction and
printed 3D models, Cardiovascular
Pathology, Vol. 58, 107404, ISSN 1054-8807,
2022, doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2021.107404.
[11] Drofova I., Adamek M., Analysis of the
structure material of the bronze object in 3D
models point cloud, Przegląd
Elektrotechniczny, 98(3), pp. 98-101, 2022,
doi.:10.15199/48.2022.03.22.
[12] Pavelka K., Fotogrammetrie 1, České vysoké
učení technické v Praze, 2009, ISBN 978-80-
01-04249-6.
[13] Pramod K., Akshay M. C., LiDar Technology,
International Journal for Research in Applied
Science & Engineering Technology, Vol. 10,
Issue V., ISSN: 2321-9653, 2022,
doi:10.22214/ijraset.2022.43007.
[14] Mikita, T., Krausková, D., Hrůza, P., Cibulka,
M., Patočka, Z., Forest Road Wearing Course
Damage Assessment Possibilities with
Different Types of Laser Scanning Methods
including New iPhone LiDAR Scanning
Apps, Forests, 2022, doi.:10.3390/f13111763.
[15] Agisoft, 2023, https://www.agisoft.com/
[16] Gonizzi Barsanti S., Guagliano M., Rossi A.,
3D Reality-Based Survey and Retopology for
Structural Analysis of Cultural
Heritage, Sensors, 2022,
doi.:10.3390/s22249593.
[17] Pavlovich, S., Same source profiling of 3D
printed firearms using deposition striae: a
discussion, Australian Journal of Forensic
Sciences, 2022,
DOI:10.1080/00450618.2022.2131910.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
This research was based on the support of the
International Grand Agency of Tomas Bata
University in Zlín, No. IGA/CebiaTech/2022/004,
and the Department of Security Engineering,
Faculty of Applied Informatics.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on INFORMATION SCIENCE and APPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/23209.2023.20.8
Irena Drofova, Milan Adamek,
Pavel Stoklasek, Martin Ficek,
Jan Valouch
E-ISSN: 2224-3402
Volume 20, 2023
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US