Let us now to show that the operator contracts
the distance between elements of the ball
To prove this, we take any two elements
and estimate the norm of the difference
between their images For this purpose,
using (17) we have the inequality
Here to estimate the expression
we use
inequality
which holds for arbitrary
Continuing the estimate (20), we get
We choose so that the inequality
holds, then the operator U contracts the distance
between elements of the ball This
condition is satisfied by where
Let Since
then, it is easy to see that
Hence, the operator for
performs a contraction mapping of
the ball to itself. Hence, according to
the contraction mapping principle, equation
(16) defines a unique solution
Theorem 2 is proved.
After finding the function the functions
is determined by the formula (15).
Thus the following assertion is valid:
Theorem 3. Let conditions (B1)-(B3) be satisfied
and Then, the formula (15) defines
on any fixed segment
4 Conclusion
In this paper, the solvability of the inverse problem
associated with the search for an unknown
coefficient at the lowest term of a mixed parabolic-
hyperbolic type equation with a non-characteristic
line of type change is investigated. In the direct
problem, an analog of the Tricomi problem for this
equation with a nonlocal condition on the
characteristics in the hyperbolic part and initial-
boundary conditions in the parabolic part of the
domain is considered. To determine the unknown
coefficient, with respect to the solution of the direct
problem, defined in the parabolic part of the
domain, the integral overdetermination condition is
specified. The unique solvability of the inverse
problem in the sense of the classical solution is
proved.
Note that the zero-coefficient of the parabolic
equation is defined here. Many applied problems
require consideration of more general equations than
(1) and determination of other coefficients in both
parabolic and hyperbolic equations. Similar
problems and the numerical study of the inverse
problem considered in this article are open
problems.
Acknowledgement:
The author thanks the anonymous reviewers
who, after reading the article, made very useful
comments.
References:
[1] Babich V.M., Kapilevich M.B., Mikhlin S.G.,
Natanson G.I., Riz P.M., Slabodetskii L.N.,
Smirnov M.M., Linear Equations of
Mathematical Physics. Reference
Mathematical Library. Moscow: Science,
1964. [Babich V.M., Kapilevich M.B.,
Mikhlin S.G., Natanson G.I., Riz P.M.,
Slabodetskii L.N., Smirnov M.M., Lineinye
uravneniya matematicheskoi fiziki.
Spravochnaya matematicheskaya biblioteka,
Moskva: Nauka, 1964.]
[2] Gel’fand I.M., Some questions of analysis and
differential equations, Usp. Mat. Nauk, vol.
14, no. 3, 1959, pp. 3-19.
[3] Tikhonov A.N., Samarskii A.A. Equations of
Mathematical Physics. Oxford: Pergamon
Press, 1963.
[4] Zolina L.A., Boundary value problem for the
model equation of the hyperbolic-parabolic
type, U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math.
Phys., vol. 6, no. 6, 1966, pp. 63–78 [Zolina
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.18