Problem of Determining the Density of Sources in a Multidimensional
Heat Equation with the Caputo Time Fractional Derivative
DURDIMUROD DURDIEV
Bukhara Branch of Romanovskii Institute of Mathematics,
Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences,
UZBEKISTAN
also with
Differential Equations, Bukhara State University,
11 M. Ikbal St. Bukhara 200100, Bukhara,
UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: - In this paper, we propose a new formula for representing the solution of the third initial-boundary
value problem for multidimensional fractional heat equation with the Caputo derivative. This formula is
obtained by the continuation method used in the theory of partial differential equations with integer
derivatives. The Green’s function of the problem is also constructed in terms of the Fox function.
Involving the results of solving a direct problem and the overdetermination condition, a uniqueness theorem for
the definition of the spatial part of the multidimensional source function is proved.
Key-Words: - Fractional heat equation, Robin boundary condition, Green’s function, Fox function,
fundamental solution, direct problem, inverse problem, uniqueness.
1 Formulation of the Problems
We consider the following multidimensional
fractional heat equation in a half space:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
the solution of which satisfies the initial condition
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇝󰇞󰇛󰇜
and the boundary condition
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇝󰇝󰇞󰇞󰇛󰇜
where
󰇝󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇞 the Caputo fractional differential
operator of the order is defined by [1,
pp. 90-99]: 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜


󰇛󰇜 is the Riemann–Liouville fractional
integral of the function 󰇛󰇜 with respect to 
is the Laplace operator concerning the variables 
and is a given finite number.
For the given functions 󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜 the
problem of finding the solution to the initial -
boundary problem (1) - (3) will be called the direct
problem. A regular solution of this problem consists
of determining the function 󰇛󰇜 such that
1) 󰇛󰇜 is twice continuously differentiable in
 for each 
2) for each 󰇛󰇜
 function 󰇛󰇜 is
continuous in for and its fractional
integral
󰇛
󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
is continuously differentiable in for 
3) 󰇛󰇜 satisfies (1)- (3) in classical sense.
In inverse problem, assuming 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 on the right side of (1), where 󰇛󰇜 is a
known function, we are interested in finding the
function 󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜
, if the solution to
problem (1)-(3) satisfies the following
overdetermination condition:
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜
Received: April 19, 2023. Revised: August 16, 2023. Accepted: November 11, 2023. Published: December 5, 2023.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
90
Volume 18, 2023
󰇛󰇜 is a given function.
At the present time, fractional PDEs have been
found as useful and applicable tools in applied
sciences. The processes of heat transfer and
diffusion phenomena in media with a fractal
structure are called anomalous, [1], [2]. The
mathematical modeling for describing transport
processes in such media is well developed based on
fractional calculus, [1], [2], [3], [4].
In the literature, inverse problems for classical
second order differential equations of parabolic type
have been studied quite deeply. There are the linear
inverse source and nonlinear inverse coefficient
problems for heat equations with different types of
the initial and initial-boundary problems (direct
problems) and over-determination conditions, [5]. In
this direction we note that the works, [6], [7], [8],
are concerned with inverse memory recovery
problems in parabolic integro-differential equations
of the second order with integral terms of
convolution type. In, [9], [10], there were proven
that if the kernel of convolution integral in a
classical integro–differential diffusion equation
coincides with the two parametric Mittag–Leffler
function of the special argument then this equation
describes the anomalously diffusive transport of
solute in heterogeneous porous media, [11]. The
methods for solving various initial-boundary value
problems for differential equations with fractional
time derivatives in the sense of Riemann-Liouville
and Caputo using functions of the Mittag-Leffler
type are given in the well-known monograph, [3],
and article, [12].
In recent years, fractional differential equations
have attracted much attention and some analytical
methods for solutions of the initial and initial-
boundary problems for such equations have been
proposed, [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19],
[20]. In works, [21], [22], the author obtained the
exact solution of the fractional diffusion equation in
half-space with the Dirichlet boundary condition. In,
[23], the fractional diffusion equation in half-space
was subject to the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary
condition and the homogeneous Neumann boundary
condition. The fractional diffusion equation in half-
space with the Robin boundary condition was
considered in, [24]. Using the integral transform
methods, including the Laplace transform and the
Fourier transform it was obtained the exact solution
of the problem.
Among the inverse problems for the fractional
diffusion equation with Riemann-Liouville and
Caputo type derivatives, the very common are
inverse source problems with different over-
determination conditions, [25], [26], [27], [28], [29],
[30], [31], and the literature in them). In the work,
[29], there also were only obtained the uniqueness
theorem for the inverse problem of determining the
various time-independent smooth coefficients
appearing in time fractional diffusion equations,
from measurements of the solution on a certain
subset at fixed time.
The inverse problem discussed here can be
treated as that of determining the density of heat
sources, which is described by the function 󰇛󰇜
acting in the semispace  This problem has a
very definite physical sense in applications: if the
function to take as 󰇛󰇜 it is associated
with problem of finding the density of radioactive
heat sources by the thermal radiation on the Earth’s
surface (condition (5)). In this case the number
defines the half-life of a radioactive element.
In this work, we construct the exact solution of
the multidimensional fractional heat (diffusion)
equation in half space with Robin type boundary
conditions. This formula is obtained by the
continuation method used in the theory of PDEs
with integer derivatives. The Green’s function of the
problem is constructed in terms of the Fox
function, [32]. Using these results we prove the
uniqueness of the solution to the inverse problem.
2 Cauchy Problem and Auxiliary
Lemma
In the beginning, we will deal with determining a
solution to the following Cauchy problem:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
The solution to the problem (6) and (7) is
determined by the formula, [17], [33]:
󰇛󰇜

 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
where 
󰇛󰇜
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
91
Volume 18, 2023

󰇡󰇛󰇜󰇢
󰇩
󰈅󰇡
󰇢󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇪󰇛󰇜
is the fundamental solution of the fractional
diffusion operator  
󰇩

󰇪 is the
generalized hypergeometric function (Fox
function). For the definition and properties of this
function, [29].
The function  is infinitely differentiable at
󰇛󰇜 for  The regularity of the function
 and some of its derivatives at 󰇛󰇜 is
determined by the regularity of the function
and its derivatives. The appearance of singularities
of the fundamental solution and its derivatives for
󰇛󰇜 is an essential difference between the
fractional diffusion equation and the classical
equations of parabolic type.
From the asymptotic behavior of the
function for large values of the argument and the
formulas of differentiation functions, [17],
[19], [21], [32].
if then

󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇡
󰇛󰇜
󰇢󰇛󰇜
Here the letters  denote various positive
constants and 



The following statement is true:
Lemma 1. Let the function 󰇛󰇜 be defined and
have bounded derivatives up to the order
inclusive, for 󰇛󰇜 and a linear
combination

 󰇛󰇜 where 
is odd with respect to the point for a fixed
Then the function
󰇛󰇜

 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
satisfies the condition
 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
To prove this, we note that the following equalities
are true:

󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
In view of (10) and the conditions of the lemma,
one can differentiate (11) times under the integral
sign. As a result, we get:
 󰇛󰇜

 󰇛󰇜
 
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
Integrating by parts on the right side of this
equality, we “throw over” the derivatives
 to the
function 󰇛󰇜 At the same time, taking into
account that the non-integral terms vanish in
accordance with (10), we obtain:
 󰇛󰇜
 
 󰇛󰇜
 󰇛󰇜

Under the conditions of lemma the integrand in
the last formula is odd with respect to at
 Therefore, the relation (12) is valid.
3 Solution of the Direct Problem
Lemma 1 allows us to solve the problem for the
homogeneous heat equation:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
with the initial condition:
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
and a homogeneous boundary condition of the form
 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
To do this, we continue the function 󰇛󰇜 for
 defining a new function 󰇛󰇜 which
satisfies conditions
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
92
Volume 18, 2023
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜at
 󰇛󰇜

 󰇛󰇜
at
(16)
and is continuous together with derivatives up to the
th order inclusive on at every fixed
We note that in the case of the homogeneous
boundary condition (3), in the formula (16) there
will be  and 
Suppose that the function 󰇛󰇜 satisfies the
matching condition: 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
According to Lemma 1, it is necessary to continue
the function 󰇛󰇜 for in such a way that
the function 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 (at every fixed
) is odd with respect to , where 󰇛󰇜 is
the continuation of the function 󰇛󰇜 on 
Obviously 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 for 󰇛󰇜
 For
determining the function 󰇛󰇜 for we
obtain the Cauchy problem for the following
differential equation:
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
where 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
Solving this problem, we find 󰇛󰇜 for
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
Thus, the 󰇛󰇜 function continues as follows:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
Writing now the solution to the problem
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
in the form of an analog of formula (8), where the
function 󰇛󰇜 is determined by the formula (17):
󰇛󰇜

 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
 
 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
after transformations, we get
󰇛󰇜
󰇟
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜󰇠
󰇛󰇜
As a result, we obtain an expression for the Green’s
function of the Robin problem for the fractional heat
equation on the half-line:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜
or, taking into account the formula (9)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
93
Volume 18, 2023

󰇛󰇜
󰇡󰇛󰇛󰇜󰇜󰇢
󰇩󰇛󰇜
󰈅󰇡
󰇢󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇪
󰇡󰇛󰇛󰇜󰇜󰇢
󰇩󰇛󰇜
󰈅󰇡
󰇢󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇪

󰇡󰇛󰇛󰇜󰇜󰇢

󰇩󰇛󰇜
󰈅󰇡
󰇢󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇪
(18)
Using the Duhamel’s principle the constructed
above Green’s function 
󰇛󰇜 one can
find a solution to the problem (1)-(3) (on the
Duhamel’s principle for the fractional diffusion
equation see, for example, [34]):
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
where 
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
4 Particular Case of the Green’s
Function
Representing the function by means of a
Mellin-Barnes type integral in the following form,
[32]: 
󰇩
󰈅󰇡
󰇢󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇪
󰇡
󰇢󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜

 󰇧
󰇨
with 󰇛󰇜 the fundamental solution (9) can
be rewritten as
󰇛󰇜
󰇡󰇛󰇜󰇢
󰇡
󰇢󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜

 󰇧
󰇨
(21)
In particular, (classical heat equation)
the representation (21) takes the form
󰇛󰇜
󰇡󰇛󰇜󰇢



󰇧
 󰇨



 󰇛󰇜󰇧
 󰇨
The contour of integration in the integral of the
last formula can be transformed to the loop 
which is started and ended at  encircling all
poles  of the function 󰇛󰇜 In
view of the Jordan lemma, the Cauchy residue
theorem and the formula 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 we get the following
equality: 󰇛󰇜



 󰇛󰇜󰇧
 󰇨
󰇛󰇜

 󰇧
 󰇨
Thus the fundamental solution  to the heat
equation takes its classical form
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜

 󰇧
 󰇨
󰇧
 󰇨
Then, as follow from the formula (20) the Green
function of the problem (1)-(3) in the case of
(i.e. (1) is a multidimensional classical
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
94
Volume 18, 2023
inhomogeneous heat equation) has the following
form: 
󰇛󰇜
󰇟󰇧󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇨
󰇧󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇨

󰇧󰇛󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇨󰇠
5 Investigation of Inverse Problem
Let 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 There holds the
following statement about the uniqueness of the
solution of the inverse problem.
Theorem. Let 󰇛󰇜 󰇟󰇜 is a bounded
function, 󰇛󰇜 is a bounded function, having at
every a finite Fourier transform
󰆻󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
depending on in a continuous way. In this case the
function 󰇛󰇜 is uniquely defined by the given
function 󰇛󰇜
Proof. Under fulfilling the conditions of Theorem,
the solution to the direct problem (1) - (3)
accordance with the formula (19) on based of the
estimates (10) satisfies the conditions of
applicability the Fourier-Laplace transform:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

After applying this transformation, the equations (1)
- (3) and (5) are reduced to the form
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰆻󰇛󰇜
 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
where 󰇛󰇜 is the Laplace transform of the function
󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
At every fixed value of the parameters and
(22) is a boundary value problem for an ordinary
differential equation with respect to A bounded
solution to this problem can be easily constructed
using the Green’s function 󰇛󰇜
for problem (22). With respect to the
variable this function is continuous and bounded
on the segment 󰇟󰇠and satisfies (in the
generalized sense) the relations:
󰇛󰇜


where 󰇛󰇜 is Dirac’s delta function.
One can easily show that the function 󰇛󰇜 has
the form 󰇛󰇜



 󰇛󰇜
In view of Green’s function the solution to the
inverse problem (22), (23) is written in the
following form
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰆻󰇛󰇜
Setting here  we obtain the Laplas equation
for 󰆻󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰆻󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
In this equation is as a parameter. The
function 󰇛󰇜 being analytical in the domain
󰇛󰇜 it can be zero only at isolated points.
Therefore (25) can be rewritten in the following
form 
󰆻󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
where the function
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
95
Volume 18, 2023
󰇛󰇜
󰇡󰇛󰇜
󰇢
󰇛󰇜󰇡󰇛󰇜󰇢

󰇛󰇜
is known in the domain 󰇛󰇜󰇛
󰇜󰇛󰇜
The function 󰇛󰇜 as we can see from (26), at
every fixed is a Laplace transform with respect to
the variable of the function 󰆻󰇛󰇜 But the
function 󰆻󰇛󰇜 is uniquely determined by the
Laplace transform values within the domain 󰇛󰇜
for instance, it can be found by the formula, [35].
󰆻󰇛󰇜

󰇩󰇛󰇜
 
󰇛󰇜󰇪
Since 󰆻󰇛󰇜 uniquely defines 󰇛󰇜
then Theorem is proven.
6 Conclusion
In this paper, the technique of the continuation
method of the solution from the infinite axis was
applied to derive an explicit solution to the third
initial-boundary problems for multidimensional
time-fractional heat equation with the Caputo
fractional derivative of the order ().
This formula for solution contains the Green’s
function Robin boundary condition. The Green’s
function of the problem is constructed in terms of
the Fox function, which is popular in the theory
of fractional calculus. It is shown, the obtained
formula coincides with the well-known formula for
solving the corresponding problem for 
Based on the results of solving a direct problem and
the overdetermination condition, a uniqueness
theorem for the definition of the spatial part of the
multidimensional source function is proved.
It is of interest both theoretically and practically
to obtain exact formulas for solutions to the
multidimensional time- and space-fractional
diffusion-wave equations (in the case of the
fractional Laplacian 󰇛󰇜 with ) in
half-space with the Dirichlet, Neumann, Robin
boundary conditions. So far, such problems are
open.
Acknowledgement:
The author thanks the anonymous reviewers who,
after reading the article, made very useful
comments.
References:
[1] Podlubny I, Fractional Differential Equations,
Academic, San Diego, 1999.
[2] Hilfer R, Applications of Fractional Calculus
in Physics, World Scientific: Singapore, 2000.
[3] Kilbas A.A., Srivastava H.M., Trujillo JJ,
Theory and application of fractional
differential equations. NorthHolland
Mathematical Studies, Amsterdam: Elsevier,
2006.
[4] Samko S.G., Kilbas A.A., Marichev OI,
Fractional integrals and derivatives. Theory
and applications. Gordon and Breach Science
Publishers, Yveron, 1993.
[5] Huashui Zhan, How to Determine the
Boundary Condition of a Strongly Degenerate
Parabolic Equation, WSEAS Transactions on
Mathematics, Vol.16, 2017, No.50, pp.471-
484.
[6] Avdonin S, Ivanov S, Wang J, Inverse
problems for the heat equation with memory.
Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2019, Vol. 13,
No. 1, pp. 31-38.
[7] Wu B, Gao Y, Yan L, et al., Existence and
Uniqueness of an Inverse Memory Kernel for
an Integro-Differential Parabolic Equation
with Free Boundary, J. Dyn. Control Syst.,
2018, Vol. 24, pp. 237-252.
[8] Durdiev D.K, Zhumaev Zh.Zh, Problem of
Determining the Thermal Memory of a
Conducting Medium Differential Equations,
Differential Equations, 2020, Vol. 56, No. 6,
pp. 785-796.
[9] Durdiev D.K., Shishkina E, Sitnik S., The
explicit formula for solution of anomalous
diffusion equation in the multi-dimensional
space, Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics,
2021, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1264-1273.
[10] Sultanov M.A., Durdiev D.K., Rahmonov
A.A., Construction of an explicit solution of a
time fractional multidimensional differential
equation, Mathematics, 2021, Vol. 9, No. 17,
2052.
[11] Schumer R, Benson D.A, Meerschaert M.M,
and Baeumer B, Frmobile/immobile solute
Transport, Water Resour. Res., 2003, Vol. 39,
pp. 1-12.
[12] Francesco Mainardi, A Tutorial on the Basic
Special Functions of Fractional Calculus,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
96
Volume 18, 2023
WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 2020,
Vol. 19, 2020, No. 8, pp. 74-98.
[13] Miller K.S., Ross B, An Introduction to the
Fractional Calculus and Fractional
Differential Equations, Wiley, New York,
1993.
[14] Mainardi F, Fractional Calculus and Waves
in Linear Viscoelasticity, Imperial College,
London, 2010.
[15] Metzler R, Klafter J, The random walk’s
guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional
dynamics approach, Phys. Rep., 2000, Vol.
339, No. 1, pp. 1-77.
[16] Klafter J, Lim S.C, Metzler R, Fractional
Dynamics: Recent Advances, World
Scientific, Singapore, 2011.
[17] Eidelman S.D, Kochubei A.N, Cauchy
Problem for Fractional Diffusion Equations,
Journal of Differential Equations, 2004, Vol.
199, pp. 211-255.
[18] Agarwal R.P., Hristova S, Regan D.O’., Exact
solutions of linear Riemann–Liouville
fractional differential equations with
impulses, Rocky Mountain Journal of
Mathematics, 2020, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 779-
791.
[19] Hilfer R, Luchko Y, Tomovski Z, Operational
method for the solution of fractional
differential equations with generalized
Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives,
Frac. Calc. Appl. Anal, 2009, Vol. 12, No. 3,
pp. 299-318.
[20] Youwei Zhang, Time-Fractional Klein-
Gordon Equation: Formulation and Solution
Using Variational Methods, WSEAS
Transactions on Mathematics, Vol. 15, 2016,
No. 20, pp. 206-214.
[21] Mainardi F, Fractional relaxation-oscillation
and fractional diffusion-wave phenomena
Chaos, Solitons, Fractals, 1996, Vol. 7, No. 9,
pp. 1461-1477.
[22] Mainardi F, The fundamental solutions for the
fractional diffusion-wave equation, Applied
Mathematics Letters, 1996, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp.
23–28.
[23] Metzler R, Klafter J, Boundary value
problems for fractional diffusion equations,
Physica A , 2000, Vol. 278 pp. 107–125.
[24] Duan J.S, Wang Z, Fu S.Z, Fractional
diffusion equation in half-space with Robin
boundary Condition, Cent. Eur. J. Phys.,
2013, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 799–805.
[25] Almusalhi F, Kerbal S, Al-Salti N, Inverse
problems of a fractional differential equation
with Bessel operator, Math. Model. Nat.
Phenom., 2017, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 105-113.
[26] Fujishiro K, Kian Y, Determination of time
dependent factors of coefficients in fractional
diffusion equations, Mathematical Control
and Related Fields (MCRF), 2015, Vol. 6, No.
2, pp. 1-20.
[27] Sakamoto K, Yamamoto M, Inverse source
problem with a final overdetermination for a
fractional diffusion equation, Math. Control
Relat. Fields, 2011, Vol. 1, pp. 509-518.
[28] Zhang Y, Xu X, Inverse source problem for a
fractional diffusion equation, Inverse
Problems, - IOP Science, 2011, Vol. 27, No.
3, 035010.
[29] Kian Y, Yamamoto M, Global uniqueness in
an inverse problem for time fractional
diffusion Equations, Journal of Differential
Equations, 2018, Vol. 264, No. 2, pp. 1146-
1170.
[30] Asim Ilyas, Salman A. Malik, Summaya Saif,
Inverse problems for a multi-term time
fractional evolution equation with an
involution, Inverse Problems in Science and
Engineering, 2021, Vol. 29, No. 13, pp. 3377-
3405.
[31] Su L.D, Vasil’ev V.I, Jiang T.S, Wang G,
Identification of stationary source in the
anomalous diffusion equation, Inverse
Problems in Science and Engineering, 2021,
Vol. 29, No. 13, pp. 3406-3422.
[32] Mathai A.M, Saxena R.K, Haubold H.J, The
H-function: Theory and Application. Springer,
Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010.
[33] Schneider W.R, Wyss W. Fractional
diffusion and wave equations, J. Math. Phys.,
1989, Vol. 30, pp. 134-144.
[34] Umarov S, Saydamatov E. A fractional analog
of the Duhamel principle, Fractional Calculus
and Applied Analysis, 2006, , Vol. 9, No. 1,
pp. 57-69.
[35] Wiener N, Paley R. Fourier transform in a
complex domain. Nauka, Moscow, 1964.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
97
Volume 18, 2023
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The author contributed in the present research, at all
stages from the formulation of the problem to the
final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on HEAT and MASS TRANSFER
DOI: 10.37394/232012.2023.18.9
Durdimurod Durdiev
E-ISSN: 2224-3461
98
Volume 18, 2023