
Consequently, the filtering process is becoming
unsteady as theoretically expected. This fraction of
time is related to the second stage of filtration for an
unsteady-state flow, [1], [2]. Considering the first
case, the unsteady filtering stage can be considered as
a series of settled states and then move on to solving
the problem as mentioned in the respective studies,
[3], [4], [5]. On the other hand, when the
hydrodynamic study of the well refers to the
unsteady regime for a relatively short time of process
development; then the implementation of the
unsteady filtering replacement method with a series
of steady stages, leads to hefty errors, [3], [4]. In
such conditions, it is obligatory and indispensable to
delve into this concern in more detail by employing
new mathematical approaches with more parameters
of influence.
Strongly affected by the above-mentioned issues
and uncertainties, then the exploitation of a layer
from a central well with constant flow in the filtration
conditions for unsteady flow regimes is suggested.
Afterwards using a new mathematical technique, the
terminal constant rate solution of the radial diffusion
equation is established. The solution of the diffusion
equation with constant terminal rate taking into
account the entire flowing time was first presented in
1949 [6] using Laplace transforms for both the
constant terminal [7] rate and constant terminal
pressure cases, as well as by [8] for a well situated
within a no-flow boundary for each flow time value,
as well as for all the geometrical configurations. In
the solution presented by them, three conditions are
considered; the initial state in which the pressure
anywhere within the drainage volume is equal to the
initial equilibrium pressure p, as well as two
boundary conditions which are:
The first is the pressure at the outer, infinite
boundary that is not affected by the pressure
disturbance at the wellbore and vice versa, and the
second is the line source inner boundary condition.
They also use the Boltzmann transformation, the
diffusivity constant and the substitution of the
parameters taken into consideration by them.
The approach presented and the conclusions
obtained from our analysis are based on the initial
condition given in expression (i), the boundary
condition given in expression (ii), the piezometric
conductivity, the parameter x which is expressed as a
ratio that relates the two variables r and i which is
given in Eq 5, the parameter y which expresses the
change in pressure depending on the parameter x, as
well as the three variables
and
All these parameters taken into consideration and
their mathematical relationship expressed based on
the physical concept of fluid mobility in the porous
medium make it possible not only to solve the
diffusion equation in a different and simple
mathematical method, but also the variables that take
parts in this equation, which are expressed as a
function of different variables, help to solve many
problems encountered in the testing and
hydrodynamic analysis of wells as given in the
studies, [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].
From the literature we know that the diffusivity
equation is a combination of three physical
principles; the continuity equation, Darcy’s law and
the equation of state regarding a slightly
compressible liquid, [14], [15], [16]. Employing the
continuity equation, we can express velocities of the
flowing fluid for the case of three-direction system
(Eq.2):
(1)
The differential forms of the equation of motion
for the case of three dimensional can be given from
mathematical expression in Eq.2:
;
;
;
Likewise, the equation of state for the case of a
fluid is given and represented by the mathematical
expression in Eq.3:
On the other hand, the formulation of the
equation for the filtration of slightly compressible
fluids in isotropic porous media is reached and can be
represented by the mathematical expression in Eq.4
merging Eq.1, Eq.2 and Eq.3. [2], [4], [17].
where:
represents piezometric
conductivity.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on FLUID MECHANICS
DOI: 10.37394/232013.2024.19.30