
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
|
∇
P
|
a
t
= 450
s
t
= 900
s
t
= 1350
s
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.30
mb
t
= 450
s
t
= 900
s
t
= 1350
s
Figure 4: Profiles of |∇P|(a) and m(b) at ρ(1)
p1=
0.03,ρ(2)
p1= 0.015.
An effective algorithm has been developed on the ba-
sis of finite difference method. It is shown that tak-
ing into account the multi-stage nature of deposition
formation leads to situations that are not observed in
single-step kinetics. In particular, non-monotonicity
was observed in the dynamics of deposition formation
at certain points.
The authors need to clarify and explain the differ-
ence between the current study with the available lit-
erature, as well as the main contribution of the study
in order to emphasize the main research outcomes of
the paper.
The unique aspect of filtering two-component sus-
pensions in porous media lies in the possibility of the
deposition of first component within the passive zone,
surpassing the environmental capacity designated for
it. This scenario arises as the deposition of the first
component intensifies, not solely due to the presence
of the second component, but also because the capac-
ity reserved for the second component can be partially
occupied by the first component.
In the future works this model will be improved for
ncomponent suspension filtration. Also it will be bet-
ter to conduct laboratory experiments to estimate the
adequateness of the developed mathematical model.
References:
[1] Kanti Sen, T., Kartic, C.K., Review on sub-
surface colloids and colloid-associated con-
taminant transport in saturated porous me-
dia, Advances in Colloid and Interface Sci-
ence, Vol. 119, No. 2-3, 2006, pp. 71–96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2005.09.001.
[2] Aim, R.B., Vigneswaran, S., Prasanthi, H., Je-
gatheesan, V., Influence of Particle Size and
Size Distribution in Granular Bed Filtration
and Dynamic Microfiltration, Water Science and
Technology, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2013, pp. 56–65.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.10.018
[3] Sadiq, R., Husain, T., Al-Zahrani, A.M., Sheikh,
A.K., Farooq, S., Secondary effluent treatment by
slow sand filters: performance and risk analysis.
Water Air Soil Pollut, Vol. 143, 2003, pp. 41–63.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022894531638
[4] Feia S.,J-C. Dupla, J. Sulem, S. Ghabezloo, J.
Canou, A. Onaisi, H. L., Transport and deposition
of solid particles in uncemented petroleum reser-
voirs.21st French Congress of Mechanics., 2013.
[5] Khuzhaerov, B., Effects of blockage and erosion
on the filtration of suspensions.Journal of En-
gineering Physics, Vol. 58, 1990, pp. 185–190.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872845
[6] Al-Fares, W., Contribution of the geophysical
methods in characterizing the water leakage in
Afamia B dam, Syria.Journal of Applied Geo-
physics, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2011, pp. 464–471.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.07.014
[7] Tien C., Ramarao B.V., Granular Filtration of
Aerosols and Hydrosols 2nd ed, Elsevier, Ams-
terdam, 2007.
[8] Elimelech M., Gregory J., Jia X., Williams R.A.,
Particle Deposition and Aggregation: Mea-
surement, Modelling, and Simulation. Colloid
and Surface Engineering Series, Butterworth-
Heinemann, Oxford, 1989.
[9] Khuzhayorov B., A model of multicomponent
grouting and suffosion filtration, Journal of En-
gineering Physics and Thermophysics, Vol. 66,
1994, pp. 373-379; doi:10.1007/BF00853459.
[10] Khuzhayorov B., Model of colmatage-suffosion
filtration of disperse systems in a porous
medium, Journal of Engineering Physics and
Thermophysics, Vol. 73, 2000, pp. 668-673;
doi:10.1007/s10891-000-0073-x
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on FLUID MECHANICS
DOI: 10.37394/232013.2023.18.20
Bekzodjon Fayziev, Jamol Makhmudov,
Jabbor Mustofoqulov, Tulkin Begmatov, Rakhmon Safarov