The Drag coefficient (CD) of TPC and MSC
airfoils is almost similar in all tested AOA.
The Hybrid airfoil showed lesser CD among
the other two airfoils ranging from 20-30%
at different AOA.
The aerodynamic performance (CL/CD) of
the Hybrid airfoil increased to 10 at 4
degrees AOA and then falls sharply to 2 at
20 degrees AOA. The other two corrugated
airfoils showed similar CL/CD up to 8
degrees AOA. Beyond 16 degree AOA, the
MSC airfoil outperformed the remaining
two airfoils.
The longitudinal static stability of all
airfoils increased with an increase in AOA
up to 12 degrees and hence the dCM/dα is
positive. However, beyond 12 degrees
AOA, the CM of Hybrid and TPC airfoils
started falling. The CM of the MSC airfoil
increased continuously up to the tested
maximum AOA of 20 degrees. This showed
that the Hybrid and TPC airfoils are
unstable up to 12 degrees AOA. The MSC
airfoil showed always unstable and no
effects of AOA were felt in this airfoil.
All these above conclusions are easily
visualized by the computational simulation
by noticing leading-edge vortices, pressure
and velocity variations, and trapped vortices
inside the valleys of the corrugation. The
results are also validated by experimental
work and with the existing previous work of
Murphy and Hu [6].
References:
[1] K. Kawachi, “Flight Mechanism of Insect.
From Standpoint of View of Bio-
Fluiddynamics.,” Seibutsu Butsuri, vol. 39, no.
5, Sep. (1999), DOI: 10.2142/biophys.39.279.
[2] B. Newman, S. Savage, and D. Schouella,
“Model Test on a Wing Section of an Aeschna
Dragonfly,” Scale effects in animal locomotion,
pp. 445–477, (1997).
[3] J. Wakeling and C. Ellington, “Dragonfly
flight. I. Gliding flight and steady-state
aerodynamic forces.,” Journal of Experimental
Biology, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 543–556, Feb.
(1997), DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.3.543.
[4] C. J. C. REES, “Form and function in
corrugated insect wings,” Nature, vol. 256, no.
5514, pp. 200–203, Jul. (1975), DOI:
10.1038/256200a0.
[5] M. Okamoto, K. Yasuda, and A. Azuma,
“Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and
body of a dragonfly,” Journal of Experimental
Biology, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 281–294, Feb.
(1996), DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.2.281.
[6] J. T. Murphy and H. Hu, “An experimental
study of a bio-inspired corrugated airfoil for
micro air vehicle applications,” Experiments in
Fluids, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 531–546, Aug.
(2010), DOI: 10.1007/s00348-010-0826-z.
[7] Tsuzuki N, “A study on a miniature rotary-
wing vehicle for mars exploration: its
feasibility and aerodynamic characteristics of
the rotor,” (2005).
[8] M. Tamai, Z. Wang, G. Rajagopalan, H. Hu,
and G. He, “Aerodynamic Performance of a
Corrugated Dragonfly Airfoil Compared with
Smooth Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers,”
(2007).
[9] A. Obata and S. Shinohara, “Flow visualization
study of the aerodynamics of modeled
dragonfly wings,” AIAA Journal, vol. 47, no.
12, pp. 3043–3047, Dec. (2009), DOI:
10.2514/1.43836.
[10] C. J. Barnes and M. R. Visbal, “Numerical
exploration of the origin of aerodynamic
enhancements in [low-Reynolds number]
corrugated airfoils,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 25,
no. 11, Aug. (2013), DOI: 10.1063/1.4832655.
[11] D. E. Levy and A. Seifert, “Simplified
dragonfly airfoil aerodynamics at Reynolds
numbers below 8000,” Physics of Fluids, vol.
21, no. 7, (2009), DOI: 10.1063/1.3166867.
[12] A. Kesel. Aerodynamic Characteristics of
Dragonfly Wing Sections Compared with
Technical Airfoils. J Exp Biol; 203: 3125–3135
(2000)
[13] A. Vargas, R. Mittal, and H. Dong, “A
computational study of the aerodynamic
performance of a dragonfly wing section in
gliding flight.,” Bio inspiration & bio mimetics,
vol. 3, no. 2, p. 26004, (2008), DOI:
10.1088/1748-3182/3/2/026004.
[14] É. Mangeol, D. Ishiwaki, N. Wallisky, K. Asai,
and T. Nonomura, “Compressibility effects on
flat-plates with serrated leading-edges at a low
Reynolds number,” Experiments in Fluids, vol.
58, no. 11, Nov. (2017), DOI: 10.1007/s00348-
017-2443-6.
[15] Y. D. Dwivedi and Y B Sudhir Sastry, “An
experimental flow field study of a bio-inspired
corrugated wing at low Reynolds number,”
INCAS Bulletin, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 55–65,
(2019), DOI: 10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.3.5.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on FLUID MECHANICS
DOI: 10.37394/232013.2022.17.12
Yagya Dutta Dwivedi, Sudhir Sastry Y. B.,
Bdy Sunil, Ch. V. K. N. S. N. Moorthy,
K. Viswanath Allamraju