The Knowledge Sharing Anomaly to Improve Organizational
Citizenship Behavior
MOCHAMAD SOELTON1, MARTA1, PAIJAN1, MUHAMMAD SHIRHAN THOULLON2,
TINE YULIANTINI1, EKO TAMA PUTRA SARATIAN1, HAREFAN ARIEF1
1Lecturer, Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Business,
Universitas Mercu Buana
2International Class Management Students, Faculty of Economics and Business,
Universitas Mercu Buana
Jl. Meruya Selatan No. 1, Meruya, Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11650 (+62215840816)
INDONESIA
Abstract: Companies need skilled and qualified human resources in the competitive business world
because human resources need to be well organized and developed to complete their work optimally so
that human resources provide maximum contribution to produce high performance for progress. The
purpose of this research is to determine the influence of self-efficacy and knowledge sharing on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) in mediating job satisfaction. This research uses a
quantitative descriptive approach with a permanent employee population of 50 people. This research uses
the Smart-PLS 3.3.9 analysis method. The data collection technique was carried out using a
questionnaire. The research results show that self-efficacy has no effect on OCB, knowledge sharing has
a positive and significant effect on OCB, self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect on job
satisfaction and knowledge-sharing affects job satisfaction. Job satisfaction influences OCB, and job
satisfaction can partially mediate the influence of knowledge sharing on OCB, and job satisfaction can
mediate the influence of self-efficacy on OCB. An interesting finding, where self-efficacy is not
significant to OCB, Negative self-efficacy is not able to improve relationships between employees in
forming OCB behavior, so it cannot improve employee performance as a group or individually. In this
case it can be seen from the behavior of employees collectively, they are unable to develop or are not
moving towards development ideal behavior both individually and in groups of employees to produce
performance the organization is not getting any better either.
Keywords: Self Efficacy, Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Job Satisfaction
Received: June 19, 2022. Revised: August 11, 2023. Accepted: October 2, 2023. Published: November 1, 2023.
1 Introduction
Human resources is an important component in a
company that must be managed properly to
achieve goals that are structured in the
company's vision and mission [92], [2].
Companies need human resources who are
skilled and qualified in the competitive world of
business because HR needs to be properly
organized and nurtured so that they can
complete their work to the maximum extent
possible and so that HR contributes optimally to
produce high performance for the progress of the
company [48], [96], [1], [43].
In line with the development of
knowledge and technology that is increasingly
advanced and rapid, every individual is
inevitably required to always follow the current
development trends. As is the case with
employees at PT. Meyz Business Strategy, apart
from carrying out their duties according to the
job description, they are also required to find
any latest information regarding the regulations
made by the Indonesian government regarding
foreigners entering Indonesia during the
COVID-19 pandemic [50], [72], [41]. So in this
case, there is a need for the role of self-efficacy
to improve work performance and knowledge
sharing between employees in the company. But
companies need to remember that pressing
employees to do something that is outside the
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
326
Volume 1, 2023
job description will lead to job dissatisfaction
with the company, resulting in decreased
employee organizational citizenship behavior
(OCB), which can reduce teamwork [49], [83],
[45], [51], [88].
Organizational citizenship behavior
(OCB) is behavior that appears at the discretion
of an employee and is carried out voluntarily
and without coercion. This behavior goes
beyond the formal demands of a job or Smith's
formal job description [37], [32]. According to
[41], in Soelton (2021), the role of OCB is one
of the factors that most determines the success
of a company. Besides OCB, job satisfaction can
also affect the company's management system.
According to [41], [43], [2], and [24], job
satisfaction is a worker's assessment of how well
their work as a whole meets their needs [46],
[59].
We got this phenomenon based on
interviews from the official PT. Meyz Business
Strategy, one of which is the existence of
problems related to the sincere behavior of
employees, and it is seen that there is a decrease
in cooperation and mutual envy, as well as a
decrease in the sense of responsibility of some
employees for their respective duties and a lack
of empathy for co-workers, which results in a
decrease in OCB and a low level of job
satisfaction owned by employees. Therefore, the
importance of education about the development
of self-efficacy and knowledge sharing for
employees is to have a positive impact so that
they can be responsible again for their respective
duties and have awareness to help co-workers a
little bit.
The company needs to remember that
creating the maximum possible job satisfaction
will greatly affect the inventiveness of
employees and the survival of the company.
With increased ability, confidence, and
knowledge among fellow employees in carrying
out their duties, the level of self-efficacy and
knowledge sharing will increase, so that their
job satisfaction will also increase. Job
satisfaction is not only achieved by providing
sufficient rest time for employees but can also
be realized by carrying out two-way
communication and providing compensation that
is commensurate with what they do.
Research Gaps. Several previous studies
have been conducted on organizational
citizenship behavior with various variables.
Previous research states that organizational
communication has a positive and substantial
influence on organizational citizenship behavior,
which indicates that the better organizational
communication is implemented, the greater the
organizational citizenship behavior
demonstrated by employees [41], [37], [32], [6],
and [34]. This is in line with research conducted
[34]. It implies that motivation has a big and
good influence on organizational citizenship
behavior [55]. The positive and significant effect
of motivation on organizational citizenship
behavior means that if the basic needs, safety
and security guarantees, social security, and
appreciation felt by employees are fulfilled,
organizational citizenship behavior will increase.
[7], [30].
Meanwhile, previous research [36], [37],
identifies that the perception of organizational
support does not affect organizational
citizenship behavior. Sometimes employees
need appreciation in the form of material, not
only in the form of morals, so it can be
interpreted that the perception of organizational
support does not affect organizational
citizenship behavior [8], [36], [37], [41], [37],
[32].
2 Literature Review
2.1 Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Extra-role behavior refers to an employee's
readiness to take on a role greater than his
primary function in an organization. This is
referred to as extra-role behavior [4], [41].
Organizations with good personnel will have
greater job performance. Work conduct that
surpasses particular performance requirements is
referred to as "extra-role behavior." Because it
pertains to the work conduct of employees
connected to the organization and other
coworkers, extra-role behavior has significant
repercussions for the organization [53], [44], and
[65]. Furthermore, the employee's good attitude
toward extra-role conduct has a beneficial
influence on the efficiency and effectiveness of
the organization's overall performance [9], [14].
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
327
Volume 1, 2023
2.2 Job Satisfaction
Communication in organizations is a science
that studies how to interact within an
organization [54, [103]. Communication is an
integral part of an organization to help sustain
organizational activities [10]. According to
experts, the following is the definition:
Organizational communication is the display
and understanding of communication among
communication units within an organization
[10], [40]. Communication is the process of
effectively transmitting and receiving
information or messages between two or more
individuals so that the intended message is
comprehended. An organization is made up of
communication units that have hierarchical
connections with one another and perform
activities in a given context [57]. From these
definitions, it can be seen that organizational
communication is interrelated [82].
Communication is a tool for building a good
organization. If there is an error in the
interpretation of communication, it will affect
the goals of the organization. So that existing
human resources are required to understand
and carry out the tasks that are informed or
given. Then it is necessary to understand the
function of communication in organizations,
which will be discussed in the next theory
[84], [99], and [104].
2.3 Self-Efficacy
According to [41], self-efficacy is defined as
people's beliefs about the extent of their abilities
that can bring about changes to desired outcomes.
When every worker has a high level of self-
efficiency, it is automatic. This can contribute to
job satisfaction. According to [9], [12], and [25],
the more someone has low self-efficacy, the more
the individual They have low self-confidence in
their ability to complete the task well. Self-
efficacy can influence discipline, performance,
and the enthusiasm of a worker to complete tasks.
Self-efficacy describes the behavior by which an
individual will be aware of their ability to go deep
toward achieving certain goals. Self-efficacy also
shows how capable an individual is to behave and
act, adapting in certain situations as well as in the
face of failure or difficulties [18], [37], From this
quote, it can be concluded that self-efficacy is
very necessary for the development of every
individual to become a better person. So
confidence in yourself will help individuals
achieve the goals they want to achieve [105].
2.4 Knowledge Sharing
Knowledge sharing is an interaction and
knowledge-sharing activity carried out between
individuals in a community through virtual space
or face-to-face. The main focus of knowledge
sharing is people who are willing to exchange
information and knowledge, whether with other
people, groups, or organizations [56], [85], [106].
Knowledge sharing will be carried out in many
ways, for example, face-to-face, such as through
discussions, meetings, training, or even using
internet media, as stated in research [74].
According to [33], [94], and [94], there are
several dimensions determining knowledge
sharing, including extrinsic motivation, ability to
absorb, richness of communication media, sense
of self-worth, role behavior (in role behavior),
and knowledge sharing attitudes [33], [94], and
[94].
3. Hypothesis and Research
Framework
The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior
Self-efficacy is a belief that is embedded in the
individual, which defines that the individual can
do their job optimistically. According to
research conducted [58], [101], there is a
positive, strong, and significant relationship
between self-efficacy and organizational
citizenship behavior (OCB) [78], [93].
H1: Self-efficacy has a positive effect on
organizational citizenship behavior.
The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Companies need to know the extent to which
knowledge sharing and organizational
citizenship behavior (OCB) have a positive
effect and play a role in increasing job
satisfaction. According to research conducted
[1], there is a significant positive effect of
knowledge sharing on organizational citizenship
behavior (OCB). According to a statement [79],
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
328
Volume 1, 2023
[90], knowledge sharing is a process in which an
individual collectively interactively refines a
thought, suggestion, or idea according to
experience instructions [109].
H2: Knowledge sharing has a positive effect on
organizational citizenship behavior.
The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Job Satisfaction
According to [41], [70], and [95], a positive
relationship between self-efficacy and job
satisfaction was found in types of work that
require a high level of self-efficacy, such as
teachers, lecturers, and researchers, bank
frontliners, and salespeople. The higher the level
of self-efficacy, the higher the level of job
satisfaction, especially on the dimensions related
to emotional factors, namely satisfaction with
the achievements obtained [1], [37], [32], [41],
[11].
H3: Self-efficacy has a positive effect on job
satisfaction.
The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on Job
Satisfaction
According to research conducted [12], [37],
[32], and [41], It shows that the relationship
between knowledge sharing and job satisfaction
with knowledge has a significant direct
relationship. Basically, knowledge sharing is a
result of employee job satisfaction in the
organization. This has the impact that job
satisfaction makes employees share knowledge
with other employees [12], [23], [13], [20].
H4: Knowledge sharing has a positive effect on
job satisfaction.
The Effect of Job Satisfaction on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
In research conducted [15], [18], [32], and [41],
it was found that job satisfaction affects
organizational citizenship behavior (OCB).
Another study conducted [32], [41] found that
job satisfaction affects organizational citizenship
behavior (OCB).
H5: Job satisfaction has a positive effect on
organizational citizenship behavior.
The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior Through Job
Satisfaction
According to [60], [98], and [107], it is proven
that job satisfaction has a very strong influence
on self-efficacy. From this statement, it can be
concluded that job satisfaction is a positive
attitude shown by individuals towards their
duties so that individuals can work gracefully
without coercion from any party and can provide
optimal results for the company [16], [17], [71].
H6: Job satisfaction can mediate self-efficacy
life has a positive effect on organizational
citizenship behavior.
The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior through
Job Satisfaction
According to [18], [73], job satisfaction is an
employee who feels satisfied, tends to be absent
less often, makes a positive contribution, and
stays in the company. In contrast, a dissatisfied
employee may be absent more frequently, may
experience stress that annoys co-workers, and
may continually seek another job. The research
conducted [90] states that job satisfaction has a
positive and significant effect on knowledge
sharing [19] and [42].
H7: Job satisfaction can mediate knowledge-
sharing has a positive effect on organizational
citizenship behavior.
H1
H5
H6
H7
H2
Self-Efficacy (X1)
Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (Y)
Knowledge Sharing
(X2)
H3
Job Satisfaction (M)
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
329
Volume 1, 2023
Figure 1: Research Framework
4. Research Methods
The research design begins with
identifying problems in research locations,
formulating problems, and developing basic
theories to strengthen the basis for each variable.
So, the sampling technique in this study is a
saturated sample, namely a sample treatment
where all members of the population are used as
samples. This study used a quantitative
approach, where the survey was conducted using
the questionnaire method with the SEM (partial
least squares) methodology. The population in
this study are employees of PT. Meyz Business
Strategy, namely as many as 40 people.
This study uses primary and secondary
data collected through a questionnaire with a
Likert scale. The Likert scale is used to measure
the attitudes, opinions, and perceptions of a
person or group of people about social
phenomena. In research, this social phenomenon
has been specifically defined by researchers,
which are hereinafter referred to as research
variables [31]. With a Likert scale, the variables
to be measured are translated into variable
dimensions and indicators. Then these indicators
are used as a starting point for compiling
instrument items, which can be in the form of
statements or questions. Meanwhile, this study
measures self-efficacy as measured by indicators
of equal compensation, a safe environment,
career development, employee participation,
pride, wellness, conflict resolution, and
communication. Knowledge sharing is measured
by indicators of personal knowledge, work
procedures, and technology. Organizational
citizenship behavior is measured by indicators of
altruism, conscientiousness, sportsmanship,
courtesy, and civic virtue. Job satisfaction is
measured by indicators of achievement of work
results, awards, responsibilities, the work itself,
and development.
This research method uses data analysis
methods using SmartPLS 3.0. PLS is a variant-
based SEM statistical method designed to solve
multiple regression when specific data problems
occur. PLS (Partial Least Square) is a powerful
factor indeterminacy analysis method; therefore,
it does not assume the data must be of a certain
scale of measurement, and the number of
samples is small. PLS can also be used for
theory confirmation. Compared to covariance-
based SEM (which is represented by
LISRELEQS, or AMOS), the component-based
PLS can avoid two major problems faced by
covariance-based (CBSEM), namely
inadmissible solutions. For prediction purposes,
the PLS approach is more suitable because, with
the PLS approach, it is assumed that all variance
measures are useful variances to explain. PLS
provides a general model that includes canonical
correlation techniques, redundancy, multiple
regression, multivariate analysis of variance
(MANOVA), and principles component analysis
[31].
The purpose of PLS is to help
researchers get latent variable values for
prediction purposes. The model formula
originally defined the latent variable as a linear
aggregate of the indicators. The analysis was
performed using inferential statistical analysis.
Inferential statistics are statistical techniques
used to analyze sample data, and the results are
applied to the population.
This statistic will be suitable for use if
the sample is taken from a clear population and
the sampling technique from that population is
carried out randomly [31]. By the hypothesis
that has been formulated, in this study, statistical
data analysis was measured using SmartPLS
software, starting with model measurement
(outer model), model structure (inner model),
and hypothesis testing. PLS (Partial Least
Square) uses the principles component analysis
method in the measurement model, namely the
variant extraction block, to see the relationship
between indicators and their latent constructs by
calculating the total variance, which consists of
common variance, specific variance, and error
variance, so that the total variance becomes
high.
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
330
Volume 1, 2023
5. Results and Discussion
5.1 Results
Based on the results of data processing in the
table, it shows that out of 50 respondents, there
were 21 (42.0%) male respondents and 29
(58.0%) female respondents. The highest
number of respondents were aged between 25
and 30 years, namely 16 (32.0%) respondents,
and the lowest were respondents aged >40 years,
2 (4%) respondents. The highest education level
was diploma, with 20 (40%) respondents, and
the lowest education level was 4 (8%)
respondents. While employees with the longest
tenure of 3-5 years are 19 (38%) respondents,
those with the lowest tenure >5 years are 5
(10%) respondents based on (R2 ) tested R-
Square (Goodness of Fit / GoF).
Table 1. Characteristics of Respondents
No.
Gender
Age
Level of education
Years of service
1.
Male = 21 (42,0%)
20 – 25 = 11 (22.0%)
Sn High School = 15
(30%)
< 1 year = 10 (20%)
2.
Female = 29 (58,0%)
25 – 30 = 16 (32,0%)
Diploma = 20 (40%)
1-3 years = 16 (32%)
3.
30 – 35 = 14 (28,0%)
S1 = 11 (22%)
3 – 5 years = 19
(38%)
4.
35 – 40 = 7 (14,0%)
Others = 4 (8%)
> 5 years = 5 (10%)
5.
> 40 = 2 (4%)
Source: Process Data
Based on (R2 ) tested R-Square (Goodness of Fit/
GoF ). To assess this model using PLS, one
starts observing R2 for any assigned latent
variable. According, to [31], an R2 value of 0.75
indicates strong, 0.50 indicates moderate and
0.25 indicates weak. The relevance of the
predicted value (Q-squared) is 0.02 which means
small, 0.35 means medium, and 0.35 means
large. Testing the GOF/Goodness of Fit model
uses Predictive Relevance (Q2) on the inner
model. The value (Q2 /Q-square) must be greater
than zero (0) which indicates the model has
predictive relevance.
Table 2. Model of Goodness of Fit
Variable
AVE
Composite
Reliability
Alpha
Cronbach
R- Square
Job satisfaction
0.652
0.937
0.923
0.920
Knowledge Sharing
0.694
0.931
0.911
0.926
Organizational Citizenship
Behavior
0.658
0.958
0.953
Self-efficacy
0.620
0.919
0.897
Source: PLS Output, 2023
The estimated values for the path
relationships in the structural model must be
significant. The significance value of this
hypothesis can be obtained by the bootstrapping
procedure. See the significance of the hypothesis
by looking at the parameter coefficient values
and the significance value of the T-statistic on
the bootstrapping report algorithm. To find out
whether it is significant or not can be seen from
the T-table at alpha 0.05 (5%) = 1.96, then the
T-table is compared with the T-count (T-
statistics). The following table shows that
hypothesis testing shows that: Self Efficacy does
not have a significant effect on organizational
citizenship behavior, Knowledge Sharing has a
significant positive effect on organizational
citizenship behavior, Self Efficacy has a
significant positive effect on job satisfaction,
Knowledge Sharing has a significant positive
effect on job satisfaction, job satisfaction has a
significant positive effect on organizational
citizenship behavior, Self Efficacy has a
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
331
Volume 1, 2023
significant positive effect on organizational
citizenship behavior through job satisfaction,
and Knowledge Sharing has a significant
positive effect on organizational citizenship
behavior through job satisfaction.
Table 3. Hypothesis Testing Results
Original
Sample
Standard
Deviation
T-Statistics
P Values
Description
Self-efficacy
Organizational
citizenship behavior
0.205
0.119
1.815
0.070
Not significant
Knowledge sharing
Organizational
citizenship behavior
0.188
0.095
1.984
0.048
Positive - significant
Self-efficacy Job
Satisfaction
0.564
0.085
6.652
0.000
Positive
significant
Knowledge sharing
Job Satisfaction
0.420
0.087
4.808
0.000
Positive
significant
Job Satisfaction
Organizational
citizenship behavior
0.589
0.128
4.592
0.000
Positive
significant
Mediating
Knowledge sharing
Job Satisfaction
Organizational
citizenship behavior
0.247
0.071
3.466
0.001
Mediated
Self-efficacy Job
Satisfaction
Organizational
citizenship behavior
0.332
0.093
3.556
0.000
Mediated
Source: Process Data, 2023
Mediation Analysis
The mediation analysis was performed using the
results from the PLS-SEM algorithm and the
bootstrapping procedure, applying direct, total
specific indirect, and total effect
values. The mediating effect of job satisfaction
on Self-efficacy and Knowledge Sharing on
organizational citizenship behavior is analyzed
and tabulated in Table 4.
Table 4. Mediating Effect Analysis
Knowledge sharing
Self-efficacy
Direct w/o Med
0.188
0.205
Direct w/Med
0.247
0.332
IV > Med Beta
0.408
0.515
Med > DV Beta
0.214
0.274
IV > Med SE
0.030
0.034
Med > DV SE
0.042
0.055
Sobel test statistic
2.806
3.240
One-tailed probability
0.000
0.000
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
332
Volume 1, 2023
Two-tailed probability
0.000
0.000
Result
Significant
Significant
Note: *p<. 05, **p<.01, ***p<0.001
Hypothesis H6 shows that
Transformational Leadership (β = 0.073 and t =
0.458) does not affect organizational citizenship
behavior, but organizational learning mediates
the relationship between Transformational
Leadership and organizational citizenship
behavior. This is supported by the Sobel test
(independent vs. mediated and dependent), with
a significant mediating effect of 3,908. The
direct effect model shows that organizational
learning is mediated significantly between
transformational leadership jobs and
organizational citizenship behavior. This is
because the coefficients of X to M and M to Y
are significant in both relationships.
Hypothesis H7 shows that Work
Engagement (β = 0.297 and t = 3.569) positively
influences organizational citizenship behavior,
and organization learning mediates the
relationship between Work Engagement and
organizational citizenship behavior. This is
supported by the Sobel test (independent vs.
mediated and dependent), with a significant
mediating effect of 4,244. The direct effect
model indicates that organizational learning is
mediated significantly between work
engagement and organizational citizenship
behavior. This is because the coefficients of X to
M and M to Y are significant in both
relationships.
Source: Process Data, 2023 Figure 1. Bootstrap Test Results
Measurement is an analysis model to
test the reliability and validity of each dimension
and the indicators used to measure each variable
that was built previously. The dimensional
analysis of the model can be defined by
explaining the discriminant validity value by
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
333
Volume 1, 2023
assessing the square root value of AVE
(Average Variance Extracted) with a boost value
of more than 0.5 and a loading factor of more
than 0.5, construct validity, and Cronbach Alpha
because the composite reliability must be higher
from 0.70.
R2 (R-square) indicates a strong
creation. So, the proposed model is supported by
empirical research identified as the correct
model. Likewise, the AVE value > 0.5 indicates
that each variable in the model meets the
standard of discriminant validity. Composite
reliability and Cronbach Alpha value for each
variable is greater than 0.7 (> 0.70), meaning
that each variable is considered reliable. The
measurement results based on fact analysis
processing on dimensional model-based
indicators show that each indicator processed in
Table 2 above is categorized as invalid where
most of the loading issue values are more than >
0.50 (more than 0.50).
5.2. Discussion
The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior
Based on the hypothesis testing in this study, the
results obtained were a T-statistic value of
1.185, an original sample value of 0.205, and a P
value of 0.070. The T-statistic value is less than
the T-table value of 1.96, and the P values show
more than 0.05. These results indicate that self-
efficacy does not affect organizational
citizenship behavior. This study shows that self-
efficacy in employees varies; high or low self-
efficacy in this company does not affect
organizational citizenship behavior at work. This
study supports the research [90], [94], [95], and
[98], which found that self-efficacy is not
significant to organizational citizenship behavior
[32], [43].
The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Based on the hypothesis testing in this
study, the results obtained were a T-statistic
value of 1,984, an original sample value of
0,188, and a P value of 0,048. The T-statistic
value shows more than the T-table value of 1.96,
the original sample value shows positive, and
the P values show less than 0.05. These results
indicate that knowledge sharing has a positive
and significant effect on organizational
citizenship behavior. This study shows that
knowledge sharing has a positive impact on
increasing organizational citizenship behavior
within a company. Knowledge sharing is a
process in which an individual collectively and
interactively refines a thought, suggestion, or
idea according to experience instructions. This
can be seen in the sharing behavior among
fellow employees, which encourages
organizational citizenship behavior at work. This
research supports [95] and [98], which found
that knowledge sharing has a positive and
significant effect on organizational citizenship
behavior [26], [41], [43], and [37].
The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Job Satisfaction
Based on the hypothesis testing in this study, the
results obtained were a T-statistic value of
6,652, an original sample value of 0,564, and a P
value of 0.000. The T-statistic value shows more
than the T-table value of 1.96, the original
sample value shows positive, and the P values
show less than 0.05. This result indicates that
self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect
on job satisfaction. This company requires a
high level of self-efficacy; the higher the level of
self-efficacy, the higher the level of job
satisfaction, especially on dimensions related to
emotional factors, namely satisfaction with the
achievements obtained. If the employee's self-
efficacy is high, it will also create a high sense
of job satisfaction within the employee. In
addition, employees with high self-efficacy have
superior work abilities and can increase job
satisfaction obtained from their work. This
research is in line with Shinta's research (2021),
which found that self-efficacy has a positive
impact on job satisfaction in employees [91],
[92], [94], [96].
The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on Job
Satisfaction
Based on the hypothesis testing in this
study, the results obtained were a T-statistic
value of 4,808, an original sample value of
0,420, and a P value of 0,000. The T-statistic
value shows more than the T-table value of 1.96,
the original sample value shows positive, and
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
334
Volume 1, 2023
the P values show less than 0.05. This result
indicates that knowledge sharing has a positive
and significant effect on job satisfaction. of
employee job satisfaction in the organization.
This has the impact of job satisfaction makes
employees share knowledge with other
employees. Employees sharing among
colleagues will lead to satisfaction at work. This
research supports research conducted by [101],
showing a relationship between knowledge
sharing and job satisfaction by having a direct,
significant positive relationship [41], [81], [87].
The Effect of Job Satisfaction on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Based on the hypothesis testing in this study, the
results obtained were a T-statistic value of
4,592, an original sample value of 0,589, and a P
value of 0,000. The T-statistic value shows more
than the T-table value of 1.96, the original
sample value shows positive, and the P values
show less than 0.05. This result indicates that
job satisfaction has a positive and significant
effect on organizational citizenship behavior.
This research proves that an employee who has
job satisfaction will have a willingness to do
more things beyond his formal responsibilities.
This willingness is then known as organizational
citizenship behavior (OCB). Satisfied employees
are more likely to do their job beyond the proper
job description because they want to repay their
positive experience at work. In research
conducted [91], it was found that job satisfaction
affects organizational citizenship behavior
(OCB). Another study conducted by the results
showed that job satisfaction affects
organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) [28],
[31], [32], [89].
The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior Through Job
Satisfaction
Based on the hypothesis testing in this
study, the results obtained were a T-statistic
value of 3,466, an original sample value of
0,247, and a P value of 0,001. The T-statistic
value is greater than the T-table value of 1.96,
the original sample value shows a positive value,
and the P values show less than 0.05. These
results indicate that job satisfaction can mediate
the effect of knowledge sharing on
organizational citizenship behavior. This
research proves that employees who are willing
to share knowledge with fellow employees will
have self-satisfaction, so they want to work on
and help fellow employees working even outside
their job desk. This research supports [95] [98],
research which proves that job satisfaction can
support the effect of knowledge sharing on
organizational citizenship behavior [97], [41],
[90], [94], and [95].
The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior through
Job Satisfaction
Based on the hypothesis testing in this study,
the results obtained were a T-statistic value of
3,556, an original sample value of 0,332, and a P
value of 0,000. The T-statistic value is greater
than the T-table value of 1.96, the original
sample value shows a positive value, and the P
values show less than 0.05. These results
indicate that job satisfaction can mediate the
effect of self-efficacy on organizational
citizenship behavior. This study shows that
employees who have high self-efficacy will have
high job satisfaction, and high employee job
satisfaction will increase the voluntary attitude
of employees who do work outside the proper
job description.
This research is in line with the research
[67], and [37], which state that job satisfaction
can mediate the effect of self-efficacy on
organizational citizenship behavior [97], and
[32].
6. Conclusion and Recommendation
This research analyzes variables related to self-
efficacy, knowledge sharing, job satisfaction,
and organizational citizenship behavior. From
the results of the calculations in this research,
the following conclusions can be drawn:
An interesting finding from this research is that
self-efficacy has no influence on the formation
of OCB so that it cannot improve individually.
However, self-efficacy as seen from the
collective behavior of employees is able to
increase and can form ideal employee group
behavior so that it will be able to improve
organizational performance more effectively.
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
335
Volume 1, 2023
Knowledge sharing has a significant positive
effect on organizational citizenship behavior,
which means that the more often employees
share knowledge, the better the organizational
citizenship behavior shown by their employees.
The self-efficacy variable has a significant
positive effect on job satisfaction. It can be
explained that if employee self-efficacy is good,
job satisfaction will be created in each
employee. Meanwhile, knowledge sharing has a
significant positive effect on job satisfaction,
meaning that the more frequently employees
share knowledge, the more job satisfaction will
increase.
For the job satisfaction variable, it has a
significant positive effect on organizational
citizenship behavior. If employee job
satisfaction is high, the organizational
citizenship behavior shown by employees will
increase. Job satisfaction can mediate the
influence of knowledge sharing and self-efficacy
on organizational citizenship behavior.
An interesting finding is that, where self-
efficacy is not significant to OCB, negative self-
efficacy is not able to improve relationships
between employees in forming OCB behavior,
so it cannot improve employee performance as a
group or individually. In this case, it can be seen
from the behavior of employees collectively that
they are unable to develop or are not moving
towards development ideal behavior both
individually and in groups of employees to
produce performance. The organization isn't
getting any better either. The research results
show that theoretically, the indicators are, the
highest lies in the sportsmanship indicator, while
in practical terms it is the indicator the highest is
an indicator of caution. This also illustrates this
Even though the sportsmanship attitude of
employees determines OCB, this is not the case.
Practical presence and employee compliance
with company regulations can be achieved to
increase OCB. So that the higher the
sportsmanship attitude, the higher the level of
OCB employee
Recommendation
Suggestions for future researchers who will
conduct research on the same topic and use this
research as a reference: it is necessary to review
it again to add a wider sample. It is hoped that
this can provide a more ideal picture of research
construction.
References
[1] Soelton, M., Ramli, Y., Ali, J.A., Arief,
H., Saratian, E.T.P., Pasaribu, E. 2020.
To Imply the Organizational Citizenship
Behavior in the Work Place to Improve
Employee Performance. International
Journal of Business, Economics and
Law. Volume 21, Issue 3, April 2020.
Page 70-82. ISSN No:-2289-1552.
[2] Soelton, M., Noermijati, N., Rohman,
F., Mugiono, M. 2021. Improving The
Performance of Non-Profit
Organizations? Academy of Strategic
Management Journal, Vol 20, (2021): 1-
13
[3] Sanusi, A.C., Ariana, N., & Ariani,
N.M. (2018). Organizational Citizenship
Behavior Level at Four Points
Seminyak. Jurnal Kepariwisataan dan
Hospitalitas. 61-83.
[4] Lestari, E.R., & Ghaby, N.K.F. (2018).
The Effect of Organizational Citizenship
Behavior on Job Satisfaction and
Employee Performance. Industria:
Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen
Agroindustri.116-123.
[5] Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M., &
MacKenzie, S.B.(2006).
Organizational Citizenship Behavior:
It’s Nature, Antecedents, and
Consequences. CA: Sage
[6] Triyanthi, M., & Subudi, M. (2018). The
Effect of Organizational
Communication, Transformational
Leadership, and Organizational Justice
on Organizational Citizenship Behavior
and their Impact on Organizational
Performance and Commitment. E-
Journal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas
Udayana. 837-868.
[7] Danendra, A.A.N.B. & Mujiati, N.W.
(2016). The Effect of Motivation,
Compensation and Organizational
Commitment on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior. E-Jurnal
Manajemen Unud. Vol 5. 6229-6259
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
336
Volume 1, 2023
[8] Hayati, N. (2020). The Influence of
Perceived Organizational Support and
Organizational Culture on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
through Job Satisfaction. Equilibrium:
Jurnal Ekonomi-Manajemen-
Akuntansi.54-61
[9] Adewale, A. S., Jamil, H., & Khadijah,
A. S. (2019). Leadership self-efficacy,
change oriented behavior and
organizational citizenship behavior: The
moderating effect of experience.
International Journal of Higher
Education, 8(4), 36–51.
https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p36.
[10] Almahdali, F., Natsir, S., Hasanuddin,
B., & Husnah. (2021). The Effect of
Servant Leadership, Emotional
Intelligence, and Self-Efficacy on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior and
Employee Performance of State-Owned
Banks in Palu City. International Journal
of Multicultural and Multireligious
Understanding, 8(5), 682–694.
[11] Sari, W.S. & Putri, Y.R. (2019). The
Effect of Organizational Communication
on Employee Work Motivation of
Education Fund Management
Institutions. e-Proceeding of
Management. 1656-1664.
[12] Ludiya, H. (2017). The Impact of the
Work Environment and Organizational
Support on Employee Work Motivation
at PT Maruwa Batam. Jurnal Terapan
Manajemen dan Bisnis. 21-41.
[13] Putra, I.,P.,A.,K., & Sudibya, I., G., A
(2018). The Effect of Job Satisfaction,
Organizational Commitment and Work
Motivation on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior. E-Jurnal
Manajemen Unud. 4447-4474.
[14] Simon, A., & Naftalia S.G. (2016).
Analysis of the Effect of Work
Motivation on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior through Job
Satisfaction of Karawan at Halim
Restaurant Surabaya.Jurnal Hospitality
dan Manajemen Jasa. 374-361.
[15] Gondowahjudi, L.E., Ratri, D.R., &
Hakim, L. (2018). The Effect of
Organizational Communication on the
Performance of Health Workers
Mediated by Motivation in Malang City
Hospital. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi
Publik (JIAP). 331-342.
[16] Casu, G., Mariani, M. G., Chiesa, R.,
Guglielmi, D., & Gremigni, P. (2021).
The role of organizational citizenship
behavior and gender between job
satisfaction and task performance.
International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 18(18).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189499.
[17] Curado, C., Gonçalves, T., & Ribeiro, C.
(2023). Validating Sustainable Career
Indicators: A Case Study in a European
Energy Company. Merits, 3(1), 230
247.
https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3010014.
[18] Azhar, A., Sari, E.Y.D., & Anam, C.
(2019). Effect of Perceived
Organizational Support and job
satisfaction on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior with
organizational commitment as a
mediator Variable. Akuntabel. 36-46.
[19] Erum, H., Abid, G., Contreras, F., &
Islam, T. (2020). Role of family
motivation, workplace civility and self-
efficacy in developing affective
commitment and organizational
citizenship behavior. European Journal
of Investigation in Health, Psychology
and Education, 10(1), 358–374.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010027.
[20] Azizah, N., Pringgabayu, D., Keizer,
H.D. (2021). The Influence of
Motivation, Competence, and Work
Environment on Employee Performance
of Private Polytechnics in Bandung. 42-
27.
[21] Bari, S., & Nisa, Y.C. (2017). The
Effect of Career Development and Work
Motivation on Employee Job
Satisfaction. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen
& Bisnis.
[22] Wibowo, T.W.P. (2019). The Effect of
Perceived Organizational Support on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior in
Mediation by Affective Commitment
(Study at PT Poly Meditra Indonesia
Karanganyar). Prosiding Seminar
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
337
Volume 1, 2023
Nasional dan Call for Papers Fakultas
Ekonomi Universitas Tidar. 418-424.
[23] Farooq, N., Studies, B., & Wali, A.
(2021). Impact of Knowledge Sharing
Culture on Organizational Citizenship
Behavior Mediating Role of
Organizational Commitment. Ilkogretim
Online - Elementary Education Online,
20(5), 4584–4591.
https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.
05.506ng.
[24] Ficapal-Cusí, P., Enache-Zegheru, M.,
& Torrent-Sellens, J. (2020). Linking
perceived organizational support,
affective commitment, and knowledge
sharing with prosocial organizational
behavior of altruism and civic virtue.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1
20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410289.
[25] Jang, J., & Juliana, J. (2020). The
Influence of Perception of
Organizational Support and Work
Center on Work Commitment and
Organizational Citizenship Behavior of
Millennial Generation in the Education
Industry Jurnal Ilmiah MEA
(Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Akuntansi).
141-160.
[26] Katuuk, O.M., Mewengkang, N., &
Kalsaran, E.R. (2016). The Role of
Organizational Communication in
Improving the Existence of the Vox
Angelica Art Studio. e-journal "Acta
Diurna". 1-10.
[27] Freire, C., & Pieta, P. (2022). The
Impact of Green Human Resource
Management on Organizational
Citizenship Behaviors: The Mediating
Role of Organizational Identification
and Job Satisfaction. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 14(13).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137557.
[28] Wahjusaputri, S. (2018, July). Job
Satisfaction As A Predictor Of
Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
Indonesian Journal of Education
Review, 5(1), 167-173.
[29] Labrague, L. J., McEnroe, P., D. M.,
Leocadio, M.C., Van Bogaert, P., &
Tsaras, K. (2018). Perceptions of
organizational support and its impact on
nurses’ job outcomes. Nursing Forum,
53(3), 339–347.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12260
[30] Sukarman Purba, E. R. (2020). Perilaku
Organisasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita
Menulis
[31] Sugiyono. (2017). Qualitative
Quantitative Research Methods and
R&D. Alfabeta: Bandung.
[32] Soelton, M., Wahyono, T., Arief, H.,
Saratian, E.T.P., Setiady, K., Syah,
T.Y.R., Erlangga, A. 2021. Exploring
Factors That Influence Organizational
Performance in Non-Profit Institutions
at South Sulawesi Indonesia.
International Journal of Innovative
Science and Research Technology.
Volume 6, Issue 3, March 2021. Page
973-981. ISSN No:-2456-2165.
[33] Han, H., Ariza-Montes, A., Giorgi, G.,
& Lee, S. (2020). Utilizing green design
as workplace innovation to relieve
service employee stress in the luxury
hotel sector. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public
Health, 17(12), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124527.
[34] Haskasap, E., Saner, T., Eyupoglu, S., &
Gunsel Haskasap, C. S. (2023).
Influence of Organizational Democracy
on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
in Digital Transformation: Mediating
Effects of Job Satisfaction and
Organizational Commitment for Smart
Services. Sustainability (Switzerland),
15(1).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010452.
[35] Negara, Y.D. (2019). The Influence of
Perceived Organizational Support and
Organizational Justice on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior with
Organizational Commitment as a
Mediation Variable (Empirical Study at
PT Merpati Gemilang Mandiri Surya
Artha). Skripsi Program Studi
Manajemen Fakultas Universitas
Muhammadiyah Magelang.
[36] Numeiri, M.A.G. (2020). The Influence
of Perceived Organizational Support and
Work Environment on Performance with
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
338
Volume 1, 2023
Work Motivation as a Mediation
Variable (Study at the Office of the
Library and Archives of Kutai
Kartanegeara Regency). Tesis Program
Magister Managemen Universitas Islam
Indonesia Yogyakarta.
[37] Soelton, M., Astuti, P., Naswardi,
Susilowati, E. & Nugrahati, T. (2021).
How Workload and Work Stress Affect
Employee Performance with Burnout as
a Mediation Variable.For Paper -
Conference Economic Business
Innovation. 1-14.
[38] Hsu, W., & Yang, F. C. (2022). Factors
Associated with Home Health Aides’
Turnover Intention and Organizational
Citizenship Behavior in Long-Term
Care Services. Healthcare (Switzerland),
10(9).
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091
743.
[39] Prabasari, I.G.A.M., Martini, L.K.B, &
Suardika, N. (2018). The Effect of
Communication and Employee
Engagement on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior and Employee
Performance in Employees PT Pln
(Persero) Distribution of Bali.
International Journal of Contemporary
Research and Review. 21014-21025.
[40] Kang, J. H., Ji, Y. H., Baek, W. Y., &
Byon, K. K. (2020). Structural
relationship among physical self-
efficacy, psychological well-being, and
organizational citizenship behavior
among hotel employees: Moderating
effects of leisure-time physical activity.
International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 17(23), 1–
14.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238856.
[41] Soelton, Mochamad, Noermijati,
Noermijati, Rohman, Fatchur, Mugiono,
Mugiono. 2021. Conceptualizing the
Role of Organizational Performance in
Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance,
Economics and Business. Vol 8 No 6
(2021) 1151–1160 1151 Print ISSN:
2288-4637 / Online ISSN 2288-4645.
doi:10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.1151
[42] Raineri, N., Mejía-Morelos, J. H.,
Francoeur, V., & Paillé, P. (2016).
Employee eco-initiatives and the
workplace social exchange network.
European Management Journal, 34(1),
47–58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.10.00
6
[43] Soelton, M., Noermijati, N., Rohman,
F., Mugiono, M. 2021. Improving The
Performance of Non-Profit
Organizations? Academy of Strategic
Management Journal, Vol 20, (2021): 1-
13
[44] Kim, J., Jung, S., Seok, B., & Choi, H.
(2022). The Relationship among Four
Lifestyles of Workers amid the
COVID-19 Pandemic (Work–Life
Balance, YOLO, Minimal Life, and
Staycation) and Organizational
Effectiveness: With a Focus on Four
Countries. Sustainability, 14(21),
14059.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114059.
[45] Lopez-Martin, E., & Topa, G. (2019).
Organizational culture and job demands
and resources: Their impact on
employees’ wellbeing in a multivariate
multilevel model. International Journal
of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 16(17).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173006.
[46] Mustofa, & Eko Nugroho, J. L. (2023).
The Effect of Organizational Learning
Culture, Self-efficacy, and
Organizational Citizenship Behavior on
Knowledge Sharing Behavior (Vol. 2).
Atlantis Press International BV.
https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-
008-4_61.
[47] Na-Nan, K., Kanthong, S., &
Joungtrakul, J. (2021). An empirical
study on the model of self-efficacy and
organizational citizenship behavior
transmitted through employee
engagement, organizational commitment
and job satisfaction in the thai
automobile parts manufacturing
industry. Journal of Open Innovation:
Technology, Market, and Complexity,
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
339
Volume 1, 2023
7(3).
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030170.
[48] Na-Nan, K., Kanthong, S., Joungtrakul,
J., & Smith, I. D. (2020). Mediating
effects of job satisfaction and
organizational commitment between
problems with performance appraisal
and organizational citizenship behavior.
Journal of Open Innovation:
Technology, Market, and Complexity,
6(3).
https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC603006
4.
[49] Net, W. W. W. P., Setyaningsih, S.,
City, B., & Province, W. (2023). An
Analysis of the Transformational
Leadership Style and Self-Efficacy
Effects on Elementary School Teachers’
Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
Pegem Journal of Education and
Instruction, 13(3), 403–414.
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.
41.
[50] Nurjanah, S., Pebianti, V., & Handaru,
A. W. (2020). The influence of
transformational leadership, job
satisfaction, and organizational
commitments on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (OCB) in the
inspectorate general of the Ministry of
Education and Culture. Cogent Business
and Management, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.
1793521.
[51] Paliga, M. (2023). The Relationships of
Human-Cobot Interaction Fluency with
Job Performance and Job Satisfaction
among Cobot Operators—The
Moderating Role of Workload.
International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 20(6).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065111.
[52] Phetsombat, P., & Na-Nan, K. (2023). A
Causal Model of Ethical Leadership
Affecting the Organizational Citizenship
Behavior of Teachers in the Office of
the Basic Education Commission.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086656.
[53] Riyanto, S. (2022). The Influence of
Principal Servant Leadership, Self-
Efficacy and Teacher Work Involvement
on Organizational Citizenship Behavior
(OCB) in Improving Teacher Work
Performance at the Yayasan Abdi Karya
Elementary Education Level.
International Journal of Current Science
Research and Review, 05(02), 383–389.
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v5-i2-11.
[54] Sa’adah, N., & Rijanti, T. (2022). The
Role of Knowledge Sharing , Leader-
Member Exchange (LMX) on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior and
Employee Performance : An Empirical
Study on Public Health Center of Pati 1,
Pati 2 and Trangkil in Central Java.
International Journal of Social and
Management Studies, 3(1), 112–131.
[55] Situngkir, S. (1923). The Influence of
Sustainable Human Resources
Information System, Self-Efficacy, and
Organizational Citizenship Behavior on
the Civil Servant’s Performance of The
Ministry of State Secretary of the
Republic of Indonesia. OIDA
International Journal of Sustainable
Developmen. ISSN 1923-6654 (print)
ISSN 1923-6662.
[56] Tagliabue, M., Sigurjonsdottir, S. S., &
Sandaker, I. (2020). The effects of
performance feedback on organizational
citizenship behaviour: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. European
Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, 29(6), 841–861.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.
1796647.
[57] Urbini, F., Chirumbolo, A., & Callea, A.
(2020). Promoting individual and
organizational ocbs: The mediating role
of work engagement. Behavioral
Sciences, 10(9), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10090138.
[58] Zhang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2022). The
Influence of Workplace Friendship on
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
from the Perspective of Human
Resource Management: The Regulating
Effect of Workplace Social Self-
efficacy. ACM International Conference
Proceeding Series, 441–447.
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
340
Volume 1, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1145/3556089.355617
8.
[59] Alvin, K. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan
Prinsip–Prinsip Good Corporate
Governance Terhadap Organizational
Citizenship Behavior. Agora, 2(1), 528-
535..
[60] Anhar, I. N. U. (2020). Kerangka
Konseptual Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja
Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap
Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
Youth & Islamic Economic, 1(02), 1-8.
[61] Chang, W.-J., Liao, S.-H., Lee, Y.-J., &
Lo, W.-P. (2015). Organizational
commitment, knowledge sharing and
organizational citizenship behaviour: the
case of the Taiwanese semiconductor
industry. Knowledge Management
Research & Practice, 13(3), 299–310.
https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.51.
[62] Cheng, Q. (2009). Notice of Retraction:
Educational Professionals: The Effects
of Work Ethic on Organizational
Citizenship Behaviors. 2009
International Conference on
Computational Intelligence and
Software Engineering, 1–4.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2009.5363
525.
[63] Dipaola, M., & Tschannen-Moran, M.
(2001). Organizational Citizenship
Behavior in Schools and Its Relationship
to School Climate. Journal of School
Leadership, 11(5), 424–447.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684601011
00503
[64] Charmiati, P. G. H. A., & Surya, I. B. K.
(2019). Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja
terhadap Organizational Citizenship
Behavior dengan Komitmen
Organisasional Sebagai Variabel
Mediasi (Doctoral dissertation, Udayana
University).
[65] Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2010).
Knowledge management practices in
Indian industries—A comparative study.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 14,
708–725.10.1108/13673271011074854.
[66] Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2009).
Strategic human resource practices and
innovation performance—The mediating
role of knowledge management
capacity. Journal of Business Research,
62, 104–
114.10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.016.
[67] Chen, Y. Y., & Huang, H. L. (2012).
Knowledge management fit and its
implications for business performance:
A profile deviation analysis.
Knowledge-Based Systems, 27, 262–
270.10.1016/j.knosys.2011.11.012.
[68] Darroch, J. (2003). Developing a
measure of knowledge management
behaviors and practices. Journal of
Knowledge Management, 7, 41–
54.10.1108/13673270310505377.
[69] Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge
management, innovation and firm
performance. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 9, 101–
115.10.1108/13673270510602809.
[70] Davenport, E., & Cronin, B. (2000).
Knowledge management: Semantic drift
or conceptual shift? Journal of
Education for Library and Information
Science, 41(4), 294–306.
https://doi.org/10.2307/40324047.
[71] Odu Plessis, M. (2007). The role of
knowledge management in innovation.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 11,
20–29.10.1108/13673270710762684.
[72] Durst, S., & Edvardsson, I. R. (2012).
Knowledge management in SMEs: A
literature review. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 16, 879–
903.10.1108/13673271211276173.
[73] Demirdag, S. (2015). Assessing Teacher
Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction:
Middle School Teachers. Journal of
Educational and Instructional Studies in
the World, August, 2146–7463.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2359.53
64.
[74] Gustari, I., & Widodo, W. (2020).
Exploring the effect of empowerment
and GCG on OCB: Mediating by job
satisfaction. Journal of Xi'an University
of Architecture & Technology, 12(5),
753-761.
[75] Iqbal, H. K., Aziz, U., & Tasawar, A.
(2012). Impact of organizational justice
on organizational citizenship behavior:
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
341
Volume 1, 2023
An empirical evidence from Pakistan.
World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(9),
1348–1354.
https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.
19.09.750.
[76] Kaur, P., Malhotra, K., & Sharma, S. K.
(2020). Employer branding and
organizational citizenship behavior: The
mediating role of job satisfaction. Asia-
Pacific Journal of Management
Research and Innovation, 16(2), 122-
131.
[77] Kunda, M. M., Ataman, G., & Behram,
N. K. (2019). Corporate social
responsibility and organizational
citizenship behavior: The mediating role
of job satisfaction. Journal of Global
Responsibility.
[78] Kurniawan, F. (2018). Pengaruh
Knowledge Management Dan
Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja
Karyawan Dengan Kepuasan Kerja
Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi
Pada Tenaga Kependidikan Universitas
X Yogyakarta) (Doctoral dissertation,
Universitas Islam Indonesia).
[79] Ng, L.-P., Choong, Y.-O., Kuar, L.-S.,
Tan, C.-E., & Teoh, S.-Y. (2021). Job
satisfaction and organizational
citizenship behaviour amongst health
professionals: The mediating role of
work engagement. International Journal
of Healthcare Management, 14(3), 797–
804.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2019.
1698850.
[80] Ode, E., & Ayavoo, R. (2020).
The Mediating Role Of Knowledge
Application In The Relationshipbetween
Knowledge Management Practices And
Firm Innovation. Journal of Innovation
& Knowledge 5, 209–217.
[81] Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational
Citizenship Behavior: It’s Construct
Clean-Up Time. Human Performance,
10(2), 85–97.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup10
02_2.
[82] Putra, I. P. A. K., Kusuma, P. A., &
Sudibya, I. G. A. (2018). Pengaruh
Kepuasan Kerja, Komitmen
Organisasional Dan Motivasi Kerja
Terhadap Organizational Citizenship
Behavior. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud,
7(8), 4447-4474.
[83] Restyorini, D. F. (2019). Pengaruh
Knowledge Management Terhadap
Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Pada Pt.
Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
(Doctoral dissertation, Universitas
Airlangga).
[84] Ridzuan, A. A., Sam, H. K., & Adanan,
M. A. (2008). Knowledge management
practices in higher learning institutions
in Sarawak. Asian Journal of University
Education, 4(1), 69–89.
https://education.uitm.edu.my/ajue/wp-
content/uploads/2019/04/Chapter-6-
Knowledge-Management-Practices-in-
Higher-Learning-Institutions-in-
Sarawak.pdf.
[85] Rulianti, E. (2022). Pengaruh Komitmen
Organisasional, Kepuasan Kerja, Dan
Budaya Organisasi Terhadap
Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
Eqien-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 10(1),
341-350..
[86] Setiawan, M. H., Prayekti, P., &
Kurniawan, I. S. (2020). Faktor Yang
Mepengaruhi Organizational Citizenship
Behavior Badan Usaha Milik Desa.
JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis: Teori dan
Implementasi, 11(1), 23-34.
[87] Suriyana, N., Wijaya, R. A., &
Kumbara, V. B. (2020). Pengaruh
Tingkat Quality Of Work Life (Qwl),
Dan Knowledge Management Terhadap
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai
Variabel Intervening Pada PT. Graindo
Mediatama. Jurnal manajemen
pendidikan dan ilmu sosial, 1(2), 548-
559..
[88] Susi, D., & Hermawan, H. A. (2022).
Pengaruh Knowledge Management,
Skills, Attitude, Dan Penerapan Sistem
Informasi Akuntansi Terhadap Kinerja
Karyawan (Studi Pada Kantor Wilayah
VI PT. Bank Mandiri (persero) Tbk)
(Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas
Ekonomi dan Bisnis).
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
342
Volume 1, 2023
[89] Turulja, L., & Bajgoric, N. (2018).
Information technology, knowledge
management and human resource
management. VINE Journal of
Information and Knowledge
Management Systems, 48(2), 255–276.
https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-
2017-0035.
[90] Wang, Y.-D., & Sung, W.-C. (2016).
Predictors of Organizational Citizenship
Behavior: Ethical Leadership and
Workplace Jealousy. Journal of Business
Ethics, 135(1), 117–128.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-
2480-5.
[91] Wahyuningsih, W., Lukiana, N., &
Irwanto, J. (2019, July). Pengaruh
Kepuasan Kerja Dan Komitmen
Organisasi Terhadap Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (Studi Kasus pada
Karyawan Koperasi Serambi Dana
Lumajang). In Proceedings Progress
Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 467-474).
[92] Widodo Widodo, Sulistiasih Sulistiasih.
2021. Vitalizing organizational justice in
mediating effect of good corporate
governance on teacher’s organizational
citizenship behavior. Jurnal Konseling
dan Pendidikan. Vol. 9, No. 2, 2021, pp.
164-170. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29210/155200. ISSN:
2337-6740 (Print) ISSN: 2337-6880
(Electronic).
[93] Muzakki & Hakyesg, G, L, M (2022).
Role of Organization Citizenship
Behavior Mediation In Work Motivation
Relationship To Employee Performance:
Empirical Study. Ecobisma (Jurnal
Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen),
Vol.09, No.01, 2022, 26-27.
[94] Podsakoff, P., & MacKensie, S. (1994).
Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
and Sales Unit Effectiveness. Journal of
Marketing Research, 31, 351-363.
[95] Podsakoff, P., MacKensie, S., Paine, J.,
& Bachrach, D. (2000). Organizational
Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical
Review of the Theoretical and
Empirical Literature and Suggestions
for Future Research. Journal of
Management, 26, 513-563.
[96] Wulandary, G (2021). Pengaruh Self
Efficacy Dan Organizational Citizenship
Behavior Terhadap Knowledge Sharing
Dimediasi Abusive Supervision Survey
Pada Karyawan Perusahaan Sekuritas
Anggota Bursa Efek Indonesia Yang
Berlokasi Di Jawa Tengah Dan Diy.
Yogyakarta: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/
[97] Wulandary, Ratna (2019) Pengaruh
Kepemimpinan Transformasional Dan
Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai
Variabel Intervening. Tesis Skripsi,
Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang:
http://eprintslib.ummgl.ac.id/id/eprint/93
3
[98] Eko, A., & Tristiana, R. (2023).
Pengaruh Knowledge Sharing Dan
Komitmen Organisasional Terhadap
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai
Variabel Mediasi (Studi Pada Pegawai
KPP Madya Semarang). Journal Dikti
Ekonomik. Vol 1, No,1 Februari 2023,
pp 01-17 http://journal.lldikti9.id/
Ekonomika
[99] Jumadi., Soelton, Mochamad.,
Nugrahati, Tati. (2018). The Implication
Of Job Satisfaction That Influence
Workers To Practice Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (OCB) In The
Workplace. Archives of Business
Research, 8(5), 33-48.
[100] M Mugiono, BH Purwoko, M Soelton,
R Yuvitasari. 2020. Recognizing How
the Job Involvement, Burnout, and Self-
Efficacy Work Influences the Work
Stress at International Hospitals. 4th
International Conference on
Management, Economics and Business
(ICMEB 2019). 2020/2 (264-270).
www.atlantis-press.com
[101] Soelton, M., Inge Hutagalung, Ayu
Octaviani. (2020a). The role of work-life
balance for organizational commitment.
Management Science Letters, 10 (2020),
3693–3700.
[102] Trinovela, S & Vera, S, S,T. (2021).
Pengaruh Knowledge Sharing Dan
Employee Engagement Terhadap
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
343
Volume 1, 2023
Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Narma
Toserba, Narogong Bogor. Jurnal
Inovatif Mahasiswa Manajemen, Vol.2,
No.1, November 2021, 43-45.
[103] Ukkas, Latif (2017). The Implication Of
Job Satisfaction That Influence Workers
To Practice Organizational Citizenship
Behavior (OCB) In The Workplace.
Archives of Business Research, 8(5), 33-
48.
[104] Na-Nan, K., Kanthong, S., Joungtrakul,
J., & Smith, I. D. (2020). Mediating
effects of job satisfaction and
organizational commitment between
problems with performance appraisal
and organizational citizenship behavior.
Journal of Open Innovation:
Technology, Market, and Complexity,
6(3).
https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC603006
4.
[105] Net, W. W. W. P., Setyaningsih, S.,
City, B., & Province, W. (2023). An
Analysis of the Transformational
Leadership Style and Self-Efficacy
Effects on Elementary School Teachers
Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
Pegem Journal of Education and
Instruction, 13(3), 403–414.
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.
41.
[106] Nurjanah, S., Pebianti, V., & Handaru,
A. W. (2020). The influence of
transformational leadership, job
satisfaction, and organizational
commitments on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (OCB) in the
inspectorate general of the Ministry of
Education and Culture. Cogent Business
and Management, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.
1793521.
[107] Paliga, M. (2023). The Relationships of
Human-Cobot Interaction Fluency with
Job Performance and Job Satisfaction
among Cobot Operators—The
Moderating Role of Workload.
International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 20(6).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065111.
[108] Phetsombat, P., & Na-Nan, K. (2023). A
Causal Model of Ethical Leadership
Affecting the Organizational Citizenship
Behavior of Teachers in the Office of
the Basic Education Commission.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086656.
[109] Riyanto, S. (2022). The Influence of
Principal Servant Leadership, Self-
Efficacy and Teacher Work Involvement
on Organizational Citizenship Behavior
(OCB) in Improving Teacher Work
Performance at the Yayasan Abdi Karya
Elementary Education Level.
International Journal of Current Science
Research and Review, 05(02), 383–389.
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v5-i2-11.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
Financial Engineering
DOI: 10.37394/232032.2023.1.31
Mochamad Soelton, Marta, Paijan,
Muhammad Shirhan Thoullon,
Tine Yuliantini, Eko Tama Putra Saratian, Harefan Arief
E-ISSN: 2945-1140
344
Volume 1, 2023