Some Questions of Computational Models in Continuum Mechanics
EVELINA PROZOROVA
Mathematical-Mechanical Department
St. Petersburg State University
Av. 28 , Peterhof, 198504
RUSSIA
Abstract: The aim of the work is to study some issues of establishing the generality of experimental
and numerical methods, the possibilities of describing a continuous medium using discrete
representations of computational mathematics, the influence of the choice of basis functions on
calculation errors. The previously proposed model of continuum mechanics is discussed, including
the general action of forces and distributed moments of forces, as well as the role of boundary
conditions in Hamiltonian mechanics, especially in frequently used computational solutions to
problems in mechanics. The Runge-Kutta difference scheme for a system of partial differential
equations is analyzed. Examples are given.
Keywords: angular momentum, conservation laws, no symmetrical stress tensor, open systems,
Runge-Kutta method, open system
Received: May 19, 2022. Revised: July 21, 2023. Accepted: August 23, 2023. Published: September 15, 2023.
1. Introduction
The purpose of the work is to establish the
generality of experimental and numerical
methods, the adequacy of the description of
the continuum using discrete representations
of computational mathematics, and the study
of the choice of basis functions for
calculation errors. A possible reason for the
fact that the impossibility of description using
regular theories is practically recognized lies
in the imperfection of mathematical models
and calculation algorithms. The experiment
deals with material objects, i.e. the results are
averaged data over the elementary volumes,
which can be presented in the form of an
integral form. Computational mathematics
always deals with dimensional quantities.
Differential equations are related to the field
representation of physical quantities and are
obtained from integral equations under the
additional condition that functions are
smooth, i.e., the space of piecewise
continuous functions becomes the space of
smooth functions. Therefore,
mathematically, we are dealing with another
space, i.e., instead of discrete space (for
example, piecewise-continuous), we work in
a narrower-continuous one. These spaces
have different representations when
expanded in a Fourier series. The first can be
represented by a Fourier series only in the
region of smoothness (in difference schemes,
between nodes with stitching at the nodes), in
the second case, in the entire region. This
means that an exact adequate representation
of functions using difference schemes is
impossible even for schemes of a high order
of accuracy You can only count on the
optimal solution to the problem. Currently,
there are two areas of research: one is related
to the development and use of computational
programs without proper detailed analysis,
the other involves the use of the apparatus of
mathematical physics without checking the
convergence of the obtained asymptotic
formulas and their practical verification by
numbers. However, a mixed approach is
needed. It is impossible to start solving a
problem without an analytical study of the
problem, at least on the simplest reference
problems. Physics dictates the solution
method and the choice of numerical scheme.
This should be done especially carefully
when calculating on parallel computers.
Verification of the results of numerical
studies by analytical methods and
comparison with experiment make it possible
to guarantee the reliability of the results.
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
88
Volume 5, 2023
Most problems are non-linear. This does not
allow proving theorems and writing the
theory in a general form. That is why the role
of mathematical analysis and the construction
of reference problems of the required type,
containing the main features of the problems
being solved, increases. Analysis is very
important in constructing a physical picture
of a phenomenon based on the results
obtained by previous researchers by
numerical or asymptotic methods. Errors in
solving more "rough" problems can be an
order of magnitude larger or of the same
order as the desired values The question of
building a model is very important. Closed
systems and representations of fields are
currently being investigated. The theory is
based on Hamilton's formalism and
Liouville's formula for a closed system.
Mathematical properties are studied without
boundary conditions [1-3] The
phenomenological representation was also
used: normal flows, volume and surface
effects were evaluated, all forces were
considered additive. Dimensions rushed to
zero. It was at this stage that the
phenomenological consideration of the
observed changes in the modules of
quantities for elementary volumes
established the symmetry of the tensor for
equilibrium conditions. Since
mathematicians worked with one-
dimensional and two-dimensional systems,
everyone was satisfied with the idea of the
symmetry of the tensor: at relatively low
speeds, the results of determining quantities
important for practice coincided with the
experiment. Separate phenomena did not fit
into the theory, in particular, turbulence,
description of processes in nanostructures,
and others. Experimental results have
appeared that speak about the influence of not
only the physical quantities themselves, but
also their gradients
[4,5]. In mechanics, it is customary to
consider the Lagrange function for non-
interacting and collectively interacting
particles for closed and open systems in the
same way, which is doubtful, especially for
metallic and ionic bonds. It is believed that
the reliability of classical mechanics has been
verified by experiment and kinetic theory. To
rely on the kinetic theory, which gives the
same results as continuum mechanics, do not
allow the hypotheses underlying the kinetic
theory. The theory is statistical and is suitable
for a large number of particles. The
distribution function depends on time
through the time dependence of macro
parameters. Hilbert's hypothesis is fulfilled,
the consequence of which is the symmetry of
the stress tensor. In all works, including the
works of N.N. Bogolyubov [3], this
hypothesis underlies the theory. The
hypothesis assumes that the values of
macroparameters can be calculated from the
zeroth approximation for the equilibrium
distribution function. Therefore, according to
the hypothesis, the values for the equilibrium
distribution function with the
macroparameters found from the Euler
equations and the Navier-Stokes equations
coincide. As is known, the differences are
significant in areas with large slopes. Any
equilibrium distribution function ensures the
symmetry of the stress tensor and the absence
of the influence of the angular momentum. In
the classical approach, the law of
conservation of angular momentum is
constructed, but not applied. Theoretically,
this is due to the incomplete taking of the
integral by parts when obtaining conservation
laws and ignoring the out-integral term
present in the Ostrogradsky-Gauss theorem
[6]. The symmetry of the stress tensor leads
to a violation of the “continuity” of the
medium. Mathematically, this circumstance
follows from the choice of the conditions for
the balance of forces as the conditions for the
equilibrium of an elementary volume.
The choice of joint conditions for the balance
of forces and moments of forces leads to new
formulations of the equations. Consequently,
under the condition of the balance of forces,
we arrive at one or another classical
formulation of continuum mechanics.
The transition to differential equations is
carried out in two ways: using the main
lemma (the theory of elasticity) or taking the
integral by parts. When taking the integral by
parts, as already noted, in addition to the
well-known classical integrals of mechanics,
an external integral term (the Ostrogradsky-
Gauss theorem) should have appeared, but in
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
89
Volume 5, 2023
mechanics it was ignored. The possibility of
using the Ostrogradsky-Gauss theorem when
constructing the stress tensor only in the
normal direction has not been substantiated.
There is no reason to choose a pressure equal
to one third of the normal pressures on the
sides of an elementary volume; Pascal's law
for the equilibrium case is transferred to the
non-equilibrium one.
Physical models differ from mathematical
ones by replacing a point with finite objects,
that is, open non-stationary systems that are
close to reality are investigated. The
openness of the system and the exchange of
physical quantities changes the equations.
The dimension of elementary volumes
brings computational and physical models
closer to real objects.
In addition to continuum models, stochastic
methods are often used in mechanics and
physics. Historically, methods for describing
physical processes using distribution
functions (Boltzmann's equations, the
Leontovich kinetic equation, the Langevin
method, the Fokker-Planck equation, the
Wigner functions, etc.) arose first. Methods
of molecular dynamics and Byrd's method
appeared later, with the growth of the
possibilities of technology, although
Newton's equation was always used. Then the
question arises about the computational
method (analytical methods can rarely be
used) based on the integral representation of
the problem or on the differential
formulation. The most well-known methods
with an integral statement belong to the group
of variational methods. More often-finite
element method. The choice of basis function
is important here. Approximation within the
selected elementary volume is different for
different methods. For systems of equations,
transformations are sometimes made in order
to obtain one equation from the system, albeit
of a high order. The transition requires
additional differentiation of the equations.
Thus, once again the domain of definition of
the problem changes.
Difference schemes can be constructed using
variational principles or using direct
approximation of differential equations. In
the first case, as a rule, simple basis functions
that are not smooth are used. In the
variational formulation of the problem, the
main attention is paid to the preliminary
planned approximation of the function on a
given subdomain (on a selected element); in
the second case, for difference schemes, an
approximation on a subdomain (selected grid
cell) is built after solving the problem. From
the integral formulation of the problem
obtained in the experiment, one can obtain
various differential equations. The equations
are identical and transform into each other
with a continuous distribution of quantities,
which is what we have in field theory, but
when passing to a discrete description, they
differ from each other and do not transform
into each other by any transformations,
except for special cases. Sometimes it is
possible to bring the results closer by
applying the Lagrangian formulation of the
problem and constructing conservative
difference schemes. It is impossible to build
a completely conservative difference scheme
in the Cartesian coordinate system, but one
can approach such a scheme [7]. For
example, in the theory of elasticity or
aeromechanics. In this case, additional
requirements for the boundary conditions
arise. It turns out a wide matrix even with the
simplest approximation. They are currently
trying to apply the Rune-Kutta method to
solve a system of partial differential
equations. An analysis of the error at the
"claimed accuracy" of a fourth-order solution
yields only second-order accuracy. It should
be borne in mind that the most common
difference scheme, the flow method, despite
the integral formulation, does not correspond
to the original formulation of the problem,
since it proceeds from equations with a
symmetric tensor.
2. A little about the models.
The role of the Ostrogradsky-Gauss theorem
was discussed earlier in [6]. Here we will
focus on the phenomenological derivation of
the momentum conservation law. In the
phenomenological definition of the action of
forces, the condition of equilibrium of an
immobile elementary volume (without
liquid) is used. The static distribution of
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
90
Volume 5, 2023
forces is used (Fig. 1) and the equation of
projections on the axes of Cartesian
coordinates [8]
   ,
   ,
  . (1)
Based on this, it is concluded that
 .
  
  
   (2)
Fig. 1. Elementary volume used in the
construction of a theory.
On the basis of this tensor for an equilibrium
system, the equations of motion are written in
integral form and the Ostrogradsky-Gauss
theorem is used without an external integral
term. A conclusion is also made about the
symmetry of the stress tensor and the
predominance of surface effects compared to
volume ones. All continuum mechanics is
based on these conclusions. The kinetic
theory is based on a closed volume.
Accordingly, flows through the boundary of
the elementary volume are not taken into
account. The Liouville equation, from which
the rest of the equations are derived, is
written for a closed system.
In [9-15], an algorithm for constructing a
solution to a problem with an no symmetric
tensor is given if the solution to the problem
with a symmetric tensor is known. We give
examples of solutions.
3. Influence of the moment in
the Couette flow.
Consider a flow between two parallel flat
walls, one of which rests, and the other
moves in its plane with a constant speed 

 is a given function [8]. Further, u is the
speed, y is the normal coordinate, h is the
distance between the planes.
Let us trace the change of the solution taking
into account the influence of the moment in
comparison with the classical one.
When considering the fluid flow near an
infinite plate, for our case we obtain
󰇡
󰇢
󰇛
) =0. (3)
 
  
, h
Integration gives

 + 
= const. =
Due to the boundary conditions the constant
is equal to and, as in a turbulent layer, the
constant must be specified. Then
i
 (4)
A possible variant of satisfying the boundary
conditions on the wall is that at
,
where,

󰇛
󰇜 , large, but
the zero velocities at the two boundaries of
the wall layer do not allow flow in the
opposite direction. The thickness of the
"resting" liquid at Reynolds numbers is 10-3
cm. Indeed,  A further decrease
in velocity occurs before it vanishes, the
derivative becomes very large for air at one
atmosphere, when the plate moves at a speed
of 300 km / h at a distance of 0.2 m with a
total plate length of  for / s.
It should be noted that such a profile will
always be present inside the boundary layer
and corresponds to the inertial interval (A. N.
Kolmogorov). It should be noted that there is
no asymptotic transition from a solution for a
semi-infinite plate to a solution for an infinite
plate. For a semi-infinite plate, friction at
infinity tends to zero and at = 0 one can
obtain the Prandtl-Karman mixing length.
The classical version corresponds to the
linear profile. Hence it can be concluded that
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
91
Volume 5, 2023
the viscosity should work in two areas:
directly near the surface and at the outer
boundary. In the stationary case, the amount
of dissipated energy near the external
boundary will be equal to the amount of this
energy near the wall. The behavior of the
velocity will depend mainly on the vertical
component of the velocity and the
perturbations of the longitudinal velocity at
the outer boundary.
For our case, the classical equation and
solution have the form
󰇡
󰇢
 , for 



󰇡
󰇢 (5)
Equation with moment
󰇡
󰇢
󰇡
󰇢
 (6)


.
Near the surface, you can use the
representation of ln y in a row.
󰇟
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜 (7)
Near the wall, where the velocities are small
or zero, the solution becomes classical (no
torque). An important factor is the identity of
the formulas for laminar and turbulent
motions. Let us consider a variant of
movement at a low given speed of movement
of the lower plate.
. is small
Friction must also be specified on this
boundary. It can be assumed that since the
velocity near the wall is small, there is an
excess of boundary conditions, then to
determine the constants it will be necessary
to solve a system of equations and one of the
solutions will be the value of friction without
taking into account the moment.
4. Influence of the asymmetric
stress tensor in the problem of
steady oscillations of
viscoelastic rectangular plates.
The purpose of this part of the work is to
illustrate a method for solving a three-
dimensional problem with an no symmetric
stress tensor [9,10]. Some provisions of the
theory of elasticity are no longer valid for an
no symmetric stress tensor. For example, for
two opposite sides of an elementary volume,
we obtain our own direction of principal
stresses
 
 ,  
 (8)
and since , we get different results.
Thus, at each point there is a main direction
of stresses. The common principal axis can
only be determined in terms of integrals.
The problem of vibrational bending of
viscoelastic rectangular plates and round
cylindrical shells was solved in [16]. The
basic formulas and equations are given,
which are based on Kirchhoff's hypotheses
for plates, deformations are considered small
and obey the linear law of viscoelasticity.
Here, the influence of the no symmetric
stress tensor on the acting forces is traced. In
the work
󰇛󰇜󰇟
 󰇛󰇜
(󰇜] 󰇛󰇜 (9)

󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
 
Solutions of problems on steady-state
oscillations under the action of a load of the
form
󰇛󰇜=
 󰇛󰇜 󰇟󰇛󰇜
󰇠 (10)
for a rectangular plate of finite dimensions, in
which two opposite sides are hinged, and the
other two are arbitrary. We have chosen a
problem to illustrate the method for
determining the no symmetry of the stress
tensor. Even when using the Kirchhoff
hypothesis without taking into account the
deformation of the sections, the effect of the
no symmetry of the stress tensor is
significant. Consider a plate of small
thickness, in the Cartesian
coordinate system, the Oxy plane of which is
aligned with the middle plane of the plate.
The plate is deformed by transverse load
distributed over the face 
󰇛󰇜󰇟󰇛󰇜󰇠
󰇛󰇜
󰇟󰇛󰇜
󰇠
 󰇛󰇜
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
92
Volume 5, 2023
For projections of the displacement vector,
according to the Kirchhoff hypothesis, we
have
󰇛󰇜
 , 

= -z
 , = -z
 ,  = -2z
 .
It is assumed that the plate material obeys the
linear viscoelastic law

󰇛󰇜󰇟
 (󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
 d, (12)
where is Poisson's ratio and material
properties do not increase with temperature.
Deflection 󰇛󰇜 is sought in the
form 󰇛󰇜󰇟󰇛󰇜󰇠
󰇞
󰇥
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇦
󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜= -z
 , 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 = -
2z
 (13)
󰇛󰇜

󰇛
(󰇜

󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜

󰇡
󰇢 (14)
󰇛 󰇜 = 󰇛󰇜
 

󰇛󰇜
Enter bending and torque moments
󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜
 (15)
󰇛󰇜 
󰇛󰇜




󰇥󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇦
reduced shear force, determined by the
relation
 
 ,
The quantities
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
are functions  For
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 we have
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇛
+
󰇜, 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛
󰇜 , (16)
󰇛󰇜=
󰇛󰇜
 

󰇛
󰇜
Equations of motion of a plate element for
bending vibrations

 
 
= 󰇛󰇜 (17)

 
  
 

plate material density.
󰇛󰇜
 󰇛󰇜
 +  = 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
 󰇛󰇜
 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
 󰇛󰇜
 󰇛󰇜.
In our case, we add the equation for the
moment
󰇞
󰇥
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜󰇦
󰇛
 
 
 󰇜󰇛
 


 󰇜 
We write the equation in standard form

 +=
󰇛
 
 
 󰇜
󰇛
 
 󰇜 (18)
 

 
 
=
󰇛
 


 󰇜󰇛
 
 󰇜
󰇛󰇛


󰇛


 
 󰇜󰇛
 
 󰇜󰇜󰇜
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
93
Volume 5, 2023
 =
󰇛󰇜
Finally we get
  󰇛
 
 
 󰇜
󰇛
 
 
 󰇜
We use the results of the solution for the
symmetric tensor; if we take  as a basis,
then the first item disappears.
  󰇛
 
 
 󰇜 (19)
We need to write next equation for other
coordinates. If there is a force, the parenthesis
is replaced by that force. An iterative
procedure is performed.
5. About some difference
schemes
An important role, in addition to choosing a
model, is the choice of a solution method.
When solving problems of aeromechanics,
the control volume method is often used at
present by using for approcsimation on time
Runge-Kutta schemes with various
modifications [17,18]. The finite volume
method is an integral method. If it comes
from the initial experimental setting, then it
grasps all the components involved in the
change in value physical values in the
volume. However, now the method is being
built on the basis of existing differential
equations. In addition, the method uses the
values of functions on time layers without
passing to intermediate points in time.
Intermediate values are replaced by the
introduction of additional coefficients. We
give two versions of schemes that, after
excluding intermediate calculations, do not
lead to the Taylor series. Schemes are three-
layer on time, explicit. The latter gives them
an advantage over implicit ones. The latter
gives them an advantage over implicit ones,
but it is not to get a higher order than
traditional explicitly implicit ones.
First, consider the classic version of the
method
󰆒 = 󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 (20)
󰇟󰇠.
 ,
󰇛󰇜
󰇛

󰇜
󰇛

󰇜
 󰇛 󰇜
 
󰇛
󰇜
In the work, the implementation of the
method is as follows

󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇡
󰇛󰇜󰇢

󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜 
󰇟
󰇛󰇜 +󰇛
󰇛󰇜󰇜󰇠)

󰇛󰇜

󰇛󰇜 
󰇟
󰇛󰇜 +󰇛
󰇛󰇜󰇜󰇠)
󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜 (21)
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇟󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜󰇠
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇟󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜
󰇝
󰇛󰇜
󰇟󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜󰇞
However, after expanding into a series and
performing the summation, we have
󰇛󰇜 󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜  (22)
The following term is equal to the coefficient
1/2 times 󰇛󰇜 Therefore, we do not
get the Taylor series.
It follows that the circuit has a second order
of accuracy, but its stability increases.
Consider the simplest version of the linear
approximation. Equation of a line passing
through two points

 
 .
By definition of the derivative on the right
and on the left
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
94
Volume 5, 2023
󰇧
󰇨


For
we have Dirichlet conditions: a
function satisfies the Dirichlet conditions in
the interval (-π, π) if it is either continuous in
this interval or has a finite number of
discontinuities of the first kind, and if, in
addition, the interval (-π, π) can be divided
into tinite number such intervals, in each of
which f(x) changes monotonically. In general
case, the conditions are not met.
6. Correspondence between
variational and difference
formulations of problems in the
theory of elasticity
In the theory of elasticity, when passing to a
differential formulation of the problem, the
equations are transformed in order to simplify
them, acting on the resulting equations with
the operators rot, div, which require
differentiation of functions. For example,
when obtaining a biharmonic equation.
Namely, the main task of the theory of
elasticity (written in integral form, is the
minimization of energy (the notation is
standard : –velocity, 󰇛󰇜function, 
tensor of stress [19]
󰇛󰇜
󰇝󰇛󰇜
󰇡󰇛󰇜󰇢
 󰇞
󰇡

󰇢
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇜 (23)
In space
󰇛󰇛󰇜󰇜 on 
allowable displacements, and the
corresponding boundary value problem has
the form
(λ+μ)grad div  в 
на .

 󰇛󰇜 на 

as already noted, in the case of application of
surface forces, the div operation is applied to
the equation. The result is a biharmonic
equation
 (24)
At the same time, we narrow the class of
solutions, requiring greater smoothness of the
functions. This is especially important in the
numerical solution of the problem. The use of
smoother functions in the general case leads
to a more filled matrix with the same
requirements for the accuracy of the solution.
The biharmonic equation often underlies a
new variational formulation of the problem.
After that, the domains of definition of the
original problem and the new one are not
required to coincide. We think we are solving
the original problem. Therefore, in our
opinion, it is better to use, if a differential
statement is necessary, the representation of
the problem in the form of a system of
differential equations.
7. Conclusion
The paper presents studies of some issues
of establishing the generality of experimental
and numerical methods, the possibility of
describing a continuous medium using
discrete representations of computational
mathematics, the influence of the choice of
basis functions on calculation errors. The
previously proposed model of continuum
mechanics is discussed, including the
combined action of forces and distributed
moments of forces, the role of boundary
conditions in Hamiltonian mechanics, and
features of the most commonly used
computational methods for solving problems
in mechanics. The following cases are
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
95
Volume 5, 2023
chosen: the Couette problem and
consideration of the influence of the
asymmetric stress tensor in the problem of
establishing existing viscoelastic rectangular
plates.
References
[1].Yu.L. Klimontovich. Statistical theory of
open systems. M.: LENNARD, 2019. 524
[2]. R.Balescu. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium
statistic mechanics. A Wiley-Intersciences
Publication John Willey and Sons. New-yourk-
London…1975. 406
[3].N. N. Bogolyubov. Problems of dynamic
theory in statistical physics. Moscow:
Gostekhizdat, 1946. 146.
[4]. L.E. Panin, V.E. Panin. The effect of
"checkerboard" and mass transfer processes in
the front-end environments animate and
inanimate nature. Physical mesomechanics. T.
10, N6. 2020. 5-20.
[5].N.G .Kolbasnikov. Theory of metal pressure
treatment. Resistance to deformation and
ductility. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State
University Publishing House, 2000. 314. 21
[6]. Evelina Prozorova. Consequences of the
Ostrogradsky-Gauss theorem for numerical
simulation in aeromechanics. Elsever
Granthaalayah, Volume 8, Issue 6. 2020
[7]. A. A. Samarskii and Yu. P. Popov, Difference
Methods for Solving Problems of Gas Dynamics.
M .: Nauka. 1980. 352
[8]. L.G. Loytsyansky. Mechanics of liquid and
gas. M .: Nauka. 1970. 904
[9] Evelina V. Prozorova. Influence of the Delay
and Dispersion In mechanics. Journal of Modern
Physics, 2014, 5, 1796-1805
[10]. E.V. Prozorova . Features of the rarefied gas
description in terms of a distribution function.
APhM2018. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of
Physics: Conf. Series 1250 (2019) 012023. IOP
Publishing.
doi:10.1088/17426596/1250/1/012023
[11]. Evelina. Prozorova. The Law of
Conservation of Momentum and the Contribution
of No Potential Forces to the Equations for
Continuum Mechanics and Kinetics // Journal of
Applied Mathematics and Physics. 2022. 10,
https://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp ISSN
Online: 2327-4379 ISSN Print: 2327-4356.
[12].E.V.Prozorova. Features of the rarefied gas
description in terms of a distribution function //
APhM2018. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of
Physics: Conf. Series 1250 (2019) 012023. IOP
Publishing. doi:10.1088/17426596/1250/1/012023
[13] Evelina Prozorova. The Role of the Angular
Momentum in Shaping Collective Effects
14th Chaotic Modeling and Simulation
International Conference .Editors: Christos
H. Skiadas, Yiannis Dimotikalis Springer
Proceedings in Complexity (SPCOM). 347-360
https://media.springernature.com/w600/springer-
static/cover-hires/book/978-3-030-96964-6
[14].Evelina Prozorova . Some Consequences of
Mathematical Inaccuracies in Mechanics. WSEAS
Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, ISSN /
E-ISSN: 1991-8747 / 2224-3429, Volume 17, 2022, Art.
#17, p.124-131.
[15]. Prozorova Evelina. Influence of the
Moment in Mathematical Models for Open
Systems.
WSEAS Transactions on Applied and
Theoretical Mechanics, :
10.37394/232011.2021.16.28
[16]. PF. Nelorezov, N.M. Sirotkina. Numerical
methods for studying steady-state oscillations of
viscoelastic rectangular plates and round
cylindrical shells. Saratov. Saratov University
Press, 1997. 72
[17]. Antony Jameson, Wolfgang Schmidt, Eli
Turkel Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations
by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge-Kutta
Time-Stepping Schemes AIAA Paper
1981.1259
[18]. Pawel Buchmuller and Christiane Helzel.
Improved Accuracy of High-Order WENO Finite
Volume Methods on Cartesian Grids_
Department of Mathematics, Ruhr-University
Bochum. January 29, 2014
[19] V.M. Pestrikov, E.M. Morozov. Fracture
mechanics. St.Peterburg: EPC Professiya. 2012.
552
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The author contributed in the present research, at all
stages from the formulation of the problem to the
final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflict of interest to declare that
is relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
Engineering World
DOI:10.37394/232025.2023.5.10
Evelina Prozorova
E-ISSN: 2692-5079
96
Volume 5, 2023