
For the theoretical treatise to be feasible, we
develop a much simplified flow model. In the inlet
region, the air flow is assumed to be radial and
uniformly distributed on the azimuthal plane. The
flow velocity is inversely proportional to
. Within
the rotor channel, too, the air flow is assumed to be
purely radial and uniform. Its velocity is computed
from the continuity equation. Since the area of the
channel is reduced further due to the finite thickness
of the blades, the velocity is suddenly increased at
the interface,
, while the fluid enters the
channel. In the core, the air flow must be upward to
be drawn to the outlet. So, in this region we propose
an axi-symmetric flow model, where the vertical
velocity component is taken to be proportional to
and is dependent on t he radial position by a cubic
polynomial function of
, from which the radial
velocity component is decided from the continuity
equation. On the other hand, the azimuthal
component is determined from the principle of
conservation of angular momentum applied
throughout the core region. In the region connected
to the outlet from there, the vertical component is
taken to be independent of
and so the radial
component is zero and the azimuthal component
still follows the angular momentum conservation.
In terms of the inertial frame of reference, the
particle motion is governed by the Newton’s 2nd
law of motion, where the air drag force acts along
the air’s relative velocity referred to the particle
velocity, and the gravitational force acts downward
with a constant magnitude. The air drag coefficient
is given from
0.06
1.52
6 Re
24 0.194 Re
Re 11.55 Re
p
Dp
pp
c=++
+
(1)
where Re /
p ap p
= is the particle Reynolds
number,
the air density,
the magnitude of the
relative velocity of air,
the particle diameter, and
the dynamic viscosity of air. Since cylindrical
coordinates are used in the expression of the particle
motion, both the centripetal and Coriolis accelera-
tion terms appear on the left-hand side of the
equations, but these are moved to the right-hand
side and are treated as t he centrifugal and Coriolis
forces, respectively, for better understanding of the
physics to be given in the discussion.
Two kinds of analysis for the particle motion
have been conducted in this study; the first one is
the quasi-stagnant analysis and the second one the
numerical analysis with the full equations for the
motion of a particle. In the first kind, the particle is
assumed to be stagnant in the radial motion (but is
allowed to rotate) and simultaneously sum of the
horizontal forces (air drag plus centrifugal force) is
assumed to be zero as the basic state. Then a small
perturbation in its location is applied to determine
the basic state’s stability. In the second, after the
particle is introduced at the inlet, its trajectory is
followed with purely numerical integration of the
equations for the particle motion in time so that we
can confirm if the stability predicted in the first
analysis is indeed relevant. Such a s table quasi-
stagnant orbit of a particle turns out to be a crucial
element in understanding the superior capability of
the paste separation provided by the newly
developed separator.
3 Results and Discussion
Figure 2 shows the radial distribution of the air drag,
, and the centrifugal force,
, acting on a
particle at a quasi-stagnant state. At the outlet of the
rotor channel,
, the drag force D
f− is larger
than
inside the channel, so that the particle tends
to move toward the outlet. On the other hand,
is smaller than ce
f outside the channel, so that the
particle tends to move toward the outlet, too. This
implies that the particle’s quasi-stagnant state is
stable, and so the particle tends to accumulate there.
During that time the gravitational force will make
the particle fall down and be withdrawn through a
hole on the bottom plate of the rotor. Such scenario
is a fundamental route to understanding the superior
capability of the paste separation. On the other hand,
another quasi-stagnant state at the channel inlet,
, is unstable because
is larger than
inside the channel.
Fig. 2 Typical distribution of air drag and
centrifugal forces along the radial position.
r [m]
- f
D
, f
ce
[N/kg]
0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
r=R
b2
r=R
b1
f
ce
- f
D
N=102 rpm
Q=8m
3
/s
d
p
=0.5mm
EQUATIONS
DOI: 10.37394/232021.2022.2.3
Sung Uk Park, Young Su Kang,
Sangmo Kang, Yong Kweon Suh