
Table 2. KPI before/after Constructing Robot System
Key
Performance
Indicator
5 Conclusion
In this paper, we proposed Painting and
Replacement Automation Robot System in Spindle
Line using an articulated robot. For the experiment,
we successfully implemented a painting robot
system in the cosmetic case painting process. In
order to realize the optimal painting quality using
robots, the spraying trajectory was optimized, the
amount of paint was controlled and Auto Color
Change was applied to realize an efficient
production environment.
Through the proposed system, production speed
and painting automation at the level required in
actual manufacturing sites are possible, and the
research results will be used as important data to
improve process efficiency and product quality.
Robots that perform human-body driving functions
are expected to be needed in various industrial fields
in the future. We plan to research applications that
can disseminate and expand the technology in
various areas such as smart factories, smart cities,
and smart farms that require the role of robots.
Acknowledgment:
This work was supported by the Technology
Development Program (Project Number:
1425163235, S3261275) funded by Ministry of
SMEs and Startups(MSS, Korea)
Corresponding author: Professor Jongpil Jeong
References:
[1]
Y.H. Han and J.P. Jeong, “Real-Time
Inspection of Multi-sided Surface Defects
Based on PANet Model”, Proc. Conf.
International Conference on Computational
Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), vol.
12250, pp. 623-633, Oct. 2020.
[2]
S.-H. Suh, I.-K. Woo and S.-K. Noh,
”Development of an automatic trajectory
planning system (ATPS) for spray painting
robots”, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom.,
pp. 1948-1955, Apr. 1991.
[3]
J. K. Antonio, ”Optimal trajectory planning
for spray coating”, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf.
Robot. Autom., pp. 2570-2577, May 1994..
[4]
H. Chen, W. Sheng, N. Xi, M. Song and Y.
Chen, ”Automated robot trajectory planning
for spray painting of free-form surfaces in
automotive manufacturing”, , Proc. IEEE Int.
Conf. Robot. Autom., vol. 1, pp. 450-455,
May 2002.
[5]
P. N. Atkar, H. Choset and A. A. Rizzi,
”Towards optimal coverage of 2-dimensional
surfaces embedded in IR³: Choice of start
curve ”,, Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell.
Robots Syst. (IROS), vol. 4, pp. 3581-3587,
Oct. 2003.
[6]
W. Sheng, H. Chen, N. Xi and Y. Chen,
”Tool path planning for compound surfaces
in spray forming processes”, , IEEE Trans.
Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 240-249,
Jul. 2005.
[7]
W. Chen and D. Zhao, ”Path planning for
spray painting robot of workpiece surfaces”, ,
Math. Problems Eng., vol. 2013, Aug. 2013.
[8]
Sj¨odin, D.R., Parida, V., Leksell, M.,
Petrovic, A., ”Smart Factory Implementation
and Process Innovation: A Preliminary
Maturity Model for Leveraging Digitalization
in ManufacturingMoving to smart factories
presents specific challenges that can be
addressed through a structured approach
focused on people, processes, and
technologies.”, Res. Technol. Manag., 2018,
61, 22–31.
[9]
Klaus-Dieter Thoben, Stefan Wiesner, and
Thorsten Wuest, “Industrie 4.0 and Smart
Manufacturing – A Review of Research
Issues and Application Examples”, ” Int. J.
Automation Technol., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 4-16,
2017.
[10]
Martin, Bradley, et al. ”A strategic
assessment of the future of us navy ship
maintenance: challenges and opportunities.”,
2017.
[11]
Osterrieder, P.; Budde, L.; Friedli, T. ”The
smart factory as a key construct of industry
4.0: A systematic literature review.”, Int. J.
Prod. Econ. , 2020, 221, 107476.
[12]
Wang. B., Tao. F., Fang. X., Liu. C., Liu.
Y. Freiheit. T.,”Smart Manufacturing and
Intelligent Manufacturing: A Comparative
Review.”, Engineering 2021, 2021, 7, 738–
757.
[13]
Mittal. S., Khan. M.A., Romero. D., Wuest.
T., ”Smart manufacturing: Characteristics,
technologies and enabling factors.”, Proc.
Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2019,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ELECTRONICS
DOI: 10.37394/232017.2023.14.1
Oungsub Kim, Yohan Han, Jongpil Jeong