
incur the so-called “Crime of Usurpation of
Functions”.
In other words, they cannot even bear the title
of Engineer or allow themselves to be treated as
such if they are not members of the Order of
Engineers!
2. Those individuals who, although registered
with the Order of Engineers, practice
“Engineering Acts” in other Engineering
specialties than their own.
In other words, they are only qualified to deal
with technical situations related to their
engineering specialty despite being Engineers,
that is, despite being members of the order.
Many young engineering graduates and holders of
a Degree in Engineering of any specialty are unaware
that there is a considerable difference from the legal
point of view between the Academic Titles of
Bachelor, Licensed, Master, or Doctor, which are
granted by a Higher Education Institution such as
Universities and Polytechnics, and the Professional
Titles of Engineer, which can only be granted by the
Order of Engineers.
So, Academic titles and Professional Titles are
very different and are awarded by entirely different
entities, academic and professional!
For example, if they designate themselves as
Engineers in any situation or circumstance, including
on social networks, whether they do so with names in
Portuguese or any other language, such as English,
without being members of the Order of Engineers,
they are legally penalized. As the Professional Title of
Engineer can only be granted by the Order of
Engineers, by doing this, these people are committing
a crime of usurpation of functions.
This difference between Academic Titles and
Professional Titles is substantial, meaning someone
can have a degree in Engineering from a higher
education institution qualified for this and yet not be
an "Engineer" if they are not a member of that order.
This difference, which, as mentioned, is substantial, is
also unknown to many people, namely young
engineering graduates, who may, without intent, fail
to comply with these legal obligations resulting from
this non-compliance and, therefore, be legally
penalized.
Therefore, training in ethics and deontology is
mandatory to register with the order and exercise the
profession. Consequently, higher education
institutions must provide this training to engineering
students when they attend their courses. The Order of
Engineers and some other orders require, following
legislation, the attendance of an Ethics and
Deontology Course taught by that order.
Other institutions, such as ACM and IEEE, also
have their codes of ethics, [5] and [6], related to the
performance, in these cases, of the profession of
software developers.
However, we understand that this course should
complement the Ethics and Deontology training taken
in higher education and not be the only training in the
area that future members of the order, that is,
Engineers, have.
Similar legal provisions apply to technical
engineers, and the Order of Technical Engineers
regulates the exercise of this profession.
These legal aspects and the legal obligation to
comply with them place more pressure on higher
education institutions regarding training their
Engineering graduates in Ethics and Deontology, [7],
[8] and [9].
In addition to the citations already made about the
development of curricula for teaching ethics and
professional deontology in higher education,
particularly in engineering courses, none of the
studies that we found and analyzed measure,
considering students' points of view, the "quality" and
"interest" that students see in these curricula.
This perception and the fact that we wanted to
avoid the training we provided being inconsequential
with the study and the current reality in other
universities also led us to consider carrying out the
analysis presented here and its extension to other
universities, higher education courses, and
institutions. In addition to this consideration from the
student's point of view, we also sought more recent
perspectives on analyzing training curricula in this
area and higher education, so we then looked for
current studies, [10], [11] and [12], that, together with
the survey we carried out, would allow us to improve
and adapt the future training.
3 Training in Ethics and Deontology
3.1 Target Audience
This training in Ethics and Deontology is included in
the curriculum of three Bachelor's Degrees in
Informatics Engineering taught at a public Portuguese
higher education institution that offers several
engineering courses at the bachelor's and master's
levels, with technical-professional courses also
available in some areas.
Two of the three Degree Courses in Informatics
Engineering are similar; the only difference is that one
operates during the Daytime, LEI-D, and the other
After Work, LEI-PL. The third, designated by LEI-
European Computer Science Course, LEI-ECS, is
based on the curriculum of the other two already
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16