Higher Education in Ethics and Deontology
Student’s Perspective Survey
JORGE BARBOSA
Department of Informatics and Systems Engineering,
Polytechnic University of Coimbra,
Rua Pedro Nunes, 3030-199, Coimbra,
PORTUGAL
Abstract: - In many countries, particularly European ones, there are professions such as Engineering, Medicine,
Law, and other professional areas that work as regulated professions; that is, they are professions that have an
organization behind them, either public or private, but in this case of public interest and framed by national
laws, which regulate these professions through the establishment of Codes of Ethics and Deontology. These
organizations require their associated professionals to comply with, in the exercise of their respective
professions, under penalty of being professionally sanctioned if they do not do it. Therefore, professionals in
these areas must be trained in Ethics and Deontology. However, in some countries, in terms of higher
education, great importance is not given to raising students' awareness of issues related to Ethics and
Deontology, particularly in some courses, even at the undergraduate level. Although it seems that training in
Ethics and Deontology is of great interest to any higher education student, regardless of the training area,
considering this training in courses related to the so-called "regulated professions" is essential. However,
specific considerations make it difficult to generalize training in these matters. In this article, we will, therefore,
address these issues and carry out a study in a specific situation regarding their consideration in Informatics
Engineering courses, a professional area whose professional exercise of specific engineering acts related to this
profession is regulated but which is very difficult to regulate. Therefore, it is necessary to make these
professionals aware of the need to comply with Ethics and Deontology in the exercise of their profession.
Higher Education is essential in transmitting these concepts to its students, who will exercise these regulated
professions. However, we also consider it essential that the basic concepts of ethics and deontology are taught
in all higher education courses. To understand the students' perspective on this topic, we will analyze the
responses that Ethics and Deontology students from Informatics Engineering Degree courses gave to a survey
about the training they had in this curricular unit and try to understand what their perception was of the area and
their interest and which was passed on to them in classes and lectures on that subject.
Key-Words: - Ethics, Deontology, Higher Education, Soft Skills, Regulated Professions, Engineering ethics.
5HFHLYHG0DUFK5HYLVHG6HSWHPEHU$FFHSWHG2FWREHU3XEOLVKHG1RYHPEHU
1 Introduction
In this paper, we analyze the results of a survey
applied to students of a curricular unity about Ethics
and Deontology in a Bachelor' s-level course.
This survey was conducted with 106 students of a
three-year Informatics Engineering Bachelor's
Course. This sample includes female and male
students, and the course has three modes of
functioning: Daytime, After Work, and a third
course, a transnational and multi-degree course in
partnership with several European Universities and
Polytechnics. This unit has five classes and ten
lectures, totaling 45 hours.
The difference with this curricular unit is that in
addition to classes, students receive lectures given by
renowned external entities. Therefore, one of the
objectives of this research is also to understand how
students perceive this mixed model of classes and
lectures.
At this level of education, a bachelor's degree is
not usually for students to have lectures, so it was
essential to know the receptivity and interest students
saw in this mixed model.
1.1 The need for Codes of Ethics and
Deontology
The need to know the basic concepts of Ethics is
fundamental for everyone, even allowing inter-
personal relationships and society to exist.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
128
Volume 21, 2024
It is also essential to know the deontological
principles, based on ethics, that should govern the
exercise of a profession.
In the particular case of so-called regulated
professions, such as Engineering, Medicine, and
Law, it is even fundamental and mandatory for the
good functioning of these professions and the
excellent understanding and relationships between
their members and clients.
These professions value being considered a
"Profession of Public Trust", a perspective they want
society to have towards this profession and its
members. For this to be possible, it is therefore
essential that all its members have irreproachable
ethical and deontological behavior that makes society
accept them and fully trust its members as
professionals. Being regulated professions have
behind them an organization, public or private, but
with public utility status, which, through its own and
specific legislation, fights for the proper functioning
of the profession as a whole and the professionals
associated with it, regulating based on a code of
Ethics and Deontology in the exercise of this
profession. Therefore, all professionals linked to a
regulated profession must be fully aware of this code
that allows the regulation of their profession.
Knowledge of and strict compliance with this code is
for the good of society but also very much for the
professionals themselves as it allows for the
establishment of trust not only among their peers but
also among society from the perspective of
considering them a “Profession of Public Trust”, as
already mentioned.
In addition to members of regulated professions,
all members of any civil society, whether or not they
are members of a regulated profession, must know
and behave ethically.
1.2 The Role of Higher Education
From the outset and when training professionals,
train them in this area and not just in the hard skills
of any profession; it is mandatory and fundamental
that educational institutions, notably Higher
Education, are also concerned with the training of
these professionals in soft skills, namely in Ethics
and Deontology. Otherwise, they are training
“incomplete” professionals.
Therefore, Higher Education institutions must
integrate soft skills into the curriculum of their
courses, whatever they may be, to allow them to train
competent citizens and professionals who are also
severe and ethical. In the particular case of
Engineering, as this is generally regulated, this is
fundamental. This Ethics and Deontology training
should not replace training in the area that the
profession's regulatory organizations also generally
promote among their members but rather be a
complement to this specific training that the
profession's regulatory organizations will give in the
future. Therefore, the perspective of training in
Higher Education institutions must be more
comprehensive, more holistic, not only focusing on
the Ethical and, in particular, Deontological aspects
of a given profession, [1], [2].
In this article, we will present and analyze, in
particular, the training given by a higher education
institution to Informatics Engineering students and
potential future Informatics Engineers. The approach
followed sought to be based on the holistic
perspective outlined above.
2 The Engineering Profession
In Portugal and many other countries, particularly
European ones, the exercise of the profession of
Engineer is subject to mandatory registration with a
professional organization called the Order of
Engineers, [3]. Therefore, the Engineering
Profession is regulated, as this order regulates the
profession's exercise in compliance with ethical and
deontological duties and obligations. This order even
has a Code of Ethics and Deontology, [4], to which
any engineer must adhere, know, respect, and act
professionally.
Any non-compliance with this code by an
Engineer as a professional when communicated to the
order is analyzed by disciplinary councils that
evaluate the situation and in case of non-compliance
with any of the duties inherent to the exercise of the
profession of Engineer, they are punished in
accordance with the provisions of a Disciplinary
Regulation.
Another important aspect is, as mentioned, to
exercise the profession of Engineer in Portugal, it is
legally mandatory to register with the order. If this
does not happen, the offender is subject to legal
penalties provided for in the Portuguese Penal Code,
[3]. The same happens with other regulated
professions such as Medicine, Law, Architecture, and
others.
Penalties can essentially result from two types of
non-compliance [4]:
1. Those individuals who, although not having or
even have any academic qualification in the
field of engineering, for example, a degree in
engineering, bear the Professional Title of
Engineer on their own and are not regularly
registered with the Order of Engineers or who
do not comply with equivalent legal obligations
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
129
Volume 21, 2024
incur the so-called Crime of Usurpation of
Functions.
In other words, they cannot even bear the title
of Engineer or allow themselves to be treated as
such if they are not members of the Order of
Engineers!
2. Those individuals who, although registered
with the Order of Engineers, practice
Engineering Acts in other Engineering
specialties than their own.
In other words, they are only qualified to deal
with technical situations related to their
engineering specialty despite being Engineers,
that is, despite being members of the order.
Many young engineering graduates and holders of
a Degree in Engineering of any specialty are unaware
that there is a considerable difference from the legal
point of view between the Academic Titles of
Bachelor, Licensed, Master, or Doctor, which are
granted by a Higher Education Institution such as
Universities and Polytechnics, and the Professional
Titles of Engineer, which can only be granted by the
Order of Engineers.
So, Academic titles and Professional Titles are
very different and are awarded by entirely different
entities, academic and professional!
For example, if they designate themselves as
Engineers in any situation or circumstance, including
on social networks, whether they do so with names in
Portuguese or any other language, such as English,
without being members of the Order of Engineers,
they are legally penalized. As the Professional Title of
Engineer can only be granted by the Order of
Engineers, by doing this, these people are committing
a crime of usurpation of functions.
This difference between Academic Titles and
Professional Titles is substantial, meaning someone
can have a degree in Engineering from a higher
education institution qualified for this and yet not be
an "Engineer" if they are not a member of that order.
This difference, which, as mentioned, is substantial, is
also unknown to many people, namely young
engineering graduates, who may, without intent, fail
to comply with these legal obligations resulting from
this non-compliance and, therefore, be legally
penalized.
Therefore, training in ethics and deontology is
mandatory to register with the order and exercise the
profession. Consequently, higher education
institutions must provide this training to engineering
students when they attend their courses. The Order of
Engineers and some other orders require, following
legislation, the attendance of an Ethics and
Deontology Course taught by that order.
Other institutions, such as ACM and IEEE, also
have their codes of ethics, [5] and [6], related to the
performance, in these cases, of the profession of
software developers.
However, we understand that this course should
complement the Ethics and Deontology training taken
in higher education and not be the only training in the
area that future members of the order, that is,
Engineers, have.
Similar legal provisions apply to technical
engineers, and the Order of Technical Engineers
regulates the exercise of this profession.
These legal aspects and the legal obligation to
comply with them place more pressure on higher
education institutions regarding training their
Engineering graduates in Ethics and Deontology, [7],
[8] and [9].
In addition to the citations already made about the
development of curricula for teaching ethics and
professional deontology in higher education,
particularly in engineering courses, none of the
studies that we found and analyzed measure,
considering students' points of view, the "quality" and
"interest" that students see in these curricula.
This perception and the fact that we wanted to
avoid the training we provided being inconsequential
with the study and the current reality in other
universities also led us to consider carrying out the
analysis presented here and its extension to other
universities, higher education courses, and
institutions. In addition to this consideration from the
student's point of view, we also sought more recent
perspectives on analyzing training curricula in this
area and higher education, so we then looked for
current studies, [10], [11] and [12], that, together with
the survey we carried out, would allow us to improve
and adapt the future training.
3 Training in Ethics and Deontology
3.1 Target Audience
This training in Ethics and Deontology is included in
the curriculum of three Bachelor's Degrees in
Informatics Engineering taught at a public Portuguese
higher education institution that offers several
engineering courses at the bachelor's and master's
levels, with technical-professional courses also
available in some areas.
Two of the three Degree Courses in Informatics
Engineering are similar; the only difference is that one
operates during the Daytime, LEI-D, and the other
After Work, LEI-PL. The third, designated by LEI-
European Computer Science Course, LEI-ECS, is
based on the curriculum of the other two already
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
130
Volume 21, 2024
mentioned but presents some differences as it is a
transnational and multi-degree course taught by a
group of European universities and polytechnics that
joined together for its creation and operation and the
institution where this training was developed is one of
the partners in this European consortium. In addition
to the regular students of these courses, there are also
some ERASMUS students attending them, as well as
in the case of the LEI-ECS, students from partner
institutions who attend this institution under the
partnership agreement for the third and final year of
their curriculum in the LEI-ECS.
Most students are young adults, with some older
students, particularly in the after-work course. Many
of these students, also mainly in the after-work
course, are working students, which allows them to
have a deeper awareness of the need for Ethics and
Deontology in interpersonal and professional
relationships, particularly in the work context in
which they operate.
As this curricular unit in Ethics and Deontology is
a curricular unit of the last academic semester, it
works alongside the Internship curricular unit,
meaning that practically all students attending this
curricular unit are inserted in companies or
institutions or, as already mentioned, they are student
workers or because they are undertaking the curricular
Internship.
The existence of these working and internship
students enables them to understand better whether or
not this training is necessary and better enables them
to assess how it works.
3.2 How Training Works
This training and the model adopted, division of the
planned classes between "traditional" classes and
lectures, has been going on for five years, and the
teacher's perception of this organization and
methodology used was very satisfactory. However, he
understood that after these five years, it should be to
evaluate the training and its operating model, which
occurred at the end of the current academic year with
the results shown below.
The "traditional" classes were taught by a teacher
from a higher education institution, and the lectures
were given by entities external to the educational
institution of recognized academic and professional
merit.
In classes, the subjects taught were the concepts
of Ethics and Deontology, the Codes of Ethics and
Deontology of the Order of Engineers and the Order
of Technical Engineers, and other subjects related to
Ethics in ICT, its particularities, and consequences for
users of such technologies.
Throughout the five Cycles of Lectures that have
taken place over the last five years, speakers were
invited to talk about various subjects complementary
to ethics, such as cybersecurity, the Portuguese legal
framework, data protection and copyright, social
solidarity, organization and functioning of the Order
of Engineers and professional legal issues, career
development of an engineer and other matters
adjacent to ethics and related to it and that could
contribute to better preparation of the students as a
good person and ethical professional.
3.3 Model and Process of the Training
According to those mentioned above, five classes and
ten lectures occurred in the current academic year.
Students could choose between two assessment
models: Continuous Assessment with Exam or
Assessment by Practical Work with Exam. In either of
the two assessment models, students were free to
attend classes or not.
In the Continuous Assessment with Examination
model, students were required to attend a minimum
number of lectures and make a minimum number of
reports on lectures they attended. These reports were
evaluated and, together with lecture attendance,
constituted the attendance grade. This grade was then
added to the grade obtained in a written exam on the
subject of the classes, thus obtaining the final grade
for the curricular unit.
In the model of Assessment by Practical Work
with Exam, students had to prepare a Practical Work
in which they wrote a report analyzing a scientific
article related to Ethics and Deontology provided to
them and other similar articles they had to research.
After a public defense, they were given a grade for
this work, which would then be added to the grade of
an exam different from the first type of assessment,
obtaining the final grade.
Most students chose the first assessment model
and some the second.
As this curricular unit was given alongside the
Internship curricular unit, carried out in companies or
institutions, many students were away from school.
For this reason, classes could not take place in person,
so a platform for teleclasses was adopted.
This teleclass option was also essential for
attracting speakers for lectures as it did not require
them to travel, which made accepting invitations and
diversifying speakers much more accessible. A hybrid
operation, in person and online, was also possible, and
some speakers opted for this hybrid operation.
The class material and some of the presentations
made in the lectures were made available to students
on a computer platform.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
131
Volume 21, 2024
4 Measurement of Results
4.1 Evaluation by Students of Functioning
and Model
This training worked well overall in the various
aspects in which it was developed: lectures, lecture
reports, classes, and academic assessment tests.
In lectures, although students only have to attend
a predetermined minimum number of lectures, a large
majority of students attended all or almost all lectures.
Student attendance at the lectures was relatively high,
reflected in the high average number of attendees.
Student participation in the final part, a period
reserved for interaction with the speaker through
questions and answers, was reasonably good.
Class participation was similar to lectures, with an
average participation rate that was also relatively
high.
The reports prepared were of an acceptable
average quality, reflected in the grades obtained in
this sub-component.
There was a small number of students who,
despite being enrolled, did not attend this curricular
unit.
All other students who attended the curricular
unit, whether they chose the first or the second
assessment method, had a positive assessment in the
frequency assessment component. The average grade
for this component was high.
Table 1 (Appendix) shows the distribution by
gender and enrollment number of the 106 students
who responded to the survey. As the classes and
lectures were common to the three courses, this table
does not show the division of students between the
different courses.
The study considered this division of students by
gender to try to understand whether the gender of the
respondent influenced the answers obtained.
Likewise, the division of students by the number
of enrollments was considered to assess whether a
more significant number of years studying in higher
education would have influenced the responses.
In the assessment of the written exam component,
the grades obtained by the students were lower than in
the assessment by frequency component. However, all
students completed the curricular unit successfully.
Given these results of the knowledge assessment,
we consider that the primary objectives of the
curricular unit were the transmission of knowledge
about the concepts of Ethics, the notions of
Professional Deontology of Engineers, reflected in the
Code of Ethics and Deontology and in the Statutes of
the Order of Engineers, the transmission of
experiences and knowledge by the speakers was fully
achieved, meaning that these students will have
obtained knowledge that will be very useful to them
when they practice their profession.
However, these academic assessment results are
in line with those of the same type carried out in the
previous four years, although in these previous years,
there could have been some influence from teaching
and assessment conditions due to functional changes
resulting from COVID-19.
Therefore, the students were expected to assess
the model and functioning of the curricular unit,
which they also did. The results of the first analysis
are shown in the following section.
4.2 Academic Measurement of Knowledge
with Assessment Tests
4.2.1 Student Assessment Model
Given the objectives of obtaining an evaluation by
students of the functioning and model of this
curricular unit, we developed a survey to be
completed by students, which asked a set of questions
with several answer options that students selected.
These surveys were distributed to students when
taking the written exam and students were invited to
fill them out and submit them when the written exam
was delivered.
Students were informed that the surveys were
anonymous and optional.
One hundred-six responses to the surveys were
obtained from 110 students present for the exam.
These numbers indicate that the students themselves
were interested in participating in this process, thus
contributing to the success of the action and extending
the teaching of subjects related to Ethics and
Deontology to the remaining courses.
These surveys were treated by obtaining response
graphs, which were created for simple and compound
questions. In these compound questions, students
were asked a basic question, and then, if they
answered affirmatively to that question, they filled out
a Likert scale grading their feelings regarding the
basic question from 1 to 5.
Also, the questions asked allow us to obtain
correlations between data that will later be treated and
presented in a new and subsequent article.
4.2.2 Survey Structure
The survey design consisted of ten questions divided
into three large groups.
The first group consisted of questions to
characterize the sample, such as gender, the course to
which they belonged, and the number of course
enrollments already made. The second group,
consisting of three simple, specific questions, aimed
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
132
Volume 21, 2024
to characterize the action. The third group, consisting
of four compound questions, also characterized the
action.
The questions were prepared to obtain
correlations between the data, such as considering the
respondent's gender and trying to conclude whether
the answers followed a specific trend of that gender
and/or the number of enrollments already carried out
and whether these factors would also be correlated
with the other responses obtained.
The compound questions were considered to the
students had to grade their perception of that
particular aspect in addition to answering a basic
question to understand and classify more correctly
how the student felt about the issue presented in the
basic question. This grading was done by presenting
students with a Likert Scale with values from 1 to 5,
in which students indicated a value on this scale if
they answered Yes to the first part of the question.
The analysis of these possible correlations has yet
to be carried out in its entirety, which is why it will
not be presented in this first article about this study
but in a subsequent one.
Therefore, the questions asked were the following:
1. First group of questions Sample
Characterization
a. gender:
Male
Female
Other
b. Course:
LEI Daytime
LEI After-work
LEI European Course / Erasmus Student
c. Number of Course Enrollments:
First Enrollment
Second Enrollment
Third or more Enrollment
2. Second group of questions Characterization
of the Experience
a. Do you understand the concepts of Ethics and
Deontology?
No
Yes
b. Have you had any training in this area?
No
Yes
c. Do you believe that this subject should be part
of the curricula of Higher Education courses?
No
Yes
d. Do you consider that giving lectures on Ethics
and Deontology was useful for your training in the
area?
No
Yes - If yes, how much?
1= a little, 5 = a lot
e. Do you understand that the training in Ethics
and Deontology you received will allow you to be
a better professional?
No
Yes - If yes, how much?
1= a little, 5 = a lot
f. Do you consider it useful to have Codes of
Ethics and Deontology in the various professions?
No
Yes - If yes, how much?
1= a little, 5 = a lot
g. In your perception, do you consider yourself an
Ethical citizen towards society?
No
Yes - If yes, how much?
1 = a little, 5 = a lot
4.2.3 Data Correlation
Through this set of questions, we will correlate the
data provided to obtain information and extract
knowledge, considering different combinations of
answers given depending on the type of respondents
to the survey, such as gender, course, number of
enrollments, whether or not you have already had
training in the area, and other considerations.
From this study presented here, some lessons
were drawn regarding the correlations that could and
should be considered.
Therefore, this aspect of correlations will be
improved in the subsequent phases of the study. The
objective will be to obtain, based on other data
combinations, the possibility of considering more
correlations to obtain more information and extract
other knowledge.
We will only analyze some of the correlations in
this analysis of results, although some can already be
done and will be presented in future articles.
4.2.4 Analysis of Survey Results
In Figure 1, we show the results of the question, Do
you understand the concepts of Ethics and
Deontology?”. This predominance of “Yes responses
was expected, given that these student respondents
had training in the area!
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
133
Volume 21, 2024
Fig. 1: Do you understand the concepts of Ethics and Deontology?
Fig. 2: Have you had any previous training in this area?
Fig. 3: Have you had any previous training in this area?
Figure 2 shows the data obtained from the
question, Have you had any previous training in this
area? It would be expected that the predominance of
"Yes" answers would be total or almost total or in line
with the answers obtained in the previous question
and for the same reasons presented there. However, a
relatively large number of "No" responses were still
obtained, given the context.
These results need to be better analyzed.
However, one cause may be that the responding
students needed to understand the question correctly
and confused the action referred to in the question
with other training than the training they had in this
curricular unit.
The graph in Figure .3 shows the data for the
question, Do you believe that this subject should be
part of the curricula of higher education courses?
These results were also not precisely expected
because, considering several aspects of the
development of this curricular unit, a percentage of
responses very close to 100% was expected. Despite
being a high value, the percentage of "Yes" responses
was 88.7%. A more careful study of this question and
the answers obtained will also be carried out, possibly
considering the correlations that can be made here.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
134
Volume 21, 2024
a) Basic Question b) Graduating Question
Fig. 4: Do you consider that giving lectures on Ethics and Deontology was useful for your training in the area?
a) Basic Question
b) Graduating Question
Fig. 5: Do you understand that the training in Ethics and Deontology you received will allow you to be a better
professional?
These results are shown in Figure 4, although
there were some "No" responses, which were as
expected, considering the number of students in the
lectures. 88.7% of students answered "Yes"!
However, we expected some "No Response
NR" responses here because although there were not
many, some students chose the second type of
assessment.
This aspect needs to be considered in future
surveys.
Overall, and once again considering the high
number of "Yes" responses, 88.7%, we consider that
holding classes and lectures meets what students
prefer and desire in this type of curricular unit where
soft skills are considered, in this case, Ethics and
Deontology.
The graph in Figure 5 refers to the possible
influence of the Ethics and Deontology concepts that
students learn in this training on their future
professional lives.
We had some expectations about the answers that
would be given to this question because it, in a way,
condenses all the perceptions that the students had
about the concepts of Ethics and Deontology and the
need and interest or not of them for their professional
life and that were transmitted to them both in classes
and in lectures.
The high number of positive responses, 90.6%,
reflects that the expectations were correct and that the
students understood that these concepts were
fundamental for a correct, healthy, and positive
professional life for their relationships with peers and
society.
The results of the graduation of "Yes" answers
corroborate our interpretation that the students
considered the concepts that were transmitted to them
to be fundamental to their professional lives. In
addition to the high number of "Yes" answers, 70.8%
of these answers were valued at "4" or "5," the two
highest values on this grading scale.
The answers to the question Do you consider it
useful to have Codes of Ethics and Deontology in the
various professions?”, whose results are shown in
Figure 6, were also very interesting and reinforce our
conviction that the students found this training very
interesting both for their personal and professional
development, to the point of considering it essential
for other colleagues in other professions. The number
of "Yes" responses was very high, 98.2% of the total
responses.
The grades given by those who answered "Yes" to
the fundamental question were also very high. There
was no assignment of the lowest grading values, "1"
and "2", with the majority of grading values given,
91.3%, being responses with the values "4" and "5".
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
135
Volume 21, 2024
Even the intermediate value "3", often given in this
type of graduation for convenience or uncertainty, had
a relatively low percentage of assignments, 8.7%.
In Figure 7, we show a graphic of the results of
the answers to the question, In your perception, do
you consider yourself an Ethical citizen towards
society?” With this question, we wanted to deflect
false answers in the sense of positivity regarding
Ethics and Deontology on the part of the students.
Our perception of all the answers to the previous
questions was very positive, indicating the students'
genuine interest in this training.
These answers and the very high number of "Yes"
answers translated into the high percentage of positive
answers, 99.1%, only confirm what we had noticed
with the answers to the previous questions as we
understand that if such a high percentage of students
want to be an "Ethical Citizen", is because they
consider being "Ethical" to be very positive and
interesting to the point that they want to be so too.
Also, when grading these "Yes" answers given in
this question, a large majority, 96.2%, of students, in
addition to grading their answer with at least the
average value "3", do so in a peremptory way as
86.7% assign one of the maximum graduation values,
"4" or "5", which is revealing of the fact that they
want to be "Ethical Citizens" or at least consider that
they want to or should be.
5 Conclusion
We conclude that the class-and-lecture approach to
teaching Ethics and Deontology soft skills is correct
and adjusted to the student's desires.
However, we will conduct more refined data
analyses, particularly considering some correlations,
to obtain more precise information and more concise
knowledge.
With this new stage, it will be possible to assess
better whether any changes to the model used until
now are necessary to improve it by incorporating the
knowledge now extracted.
It is also planned to extend this study to several
other courses and higher education institutions to
avoid bias by focusing the survey on students who
had specific training in the area. Based on this target
audience expansion, we will have more robust results
than expected from students.
a) Basic Question b) Graduating Question
Fig. 6: Do you consider it useful to have Codes of Ethics and Deontology in the various professions?
a) Basic Question
b) Graduating Question
Fig. 7: In your perception, do you consider yourself an Ethical citizen towards society?
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
136
Volume 21, 2024
Acknowledgment:
The author thanks all the students and teachers who
participated in this study, who responded to the
surveys or collaborated in their distribution and
collection of results, as well as his higher education
institution.
References:
[1]
F. A. Carreira , M. A. Guedes and M. C.
Aleixo, "Can we teach Ethics and Professional
Deontology? An Empirical Study regarding the
Accounting and Finance degree," Social
Responsibility Journal, March 2008.
[2]
Y. A. Khulief,, "Ethics Education for
Engineering Students," in 2nd Conference on
Planning & Development of Education &
Scientific Research in the Arab State, Dhahran
- Saudi Arabia, 2008.
[3]
Ordem dos Engenheiros, Estatuto da Ordem
dos Engenheiros - Lei n 11/2024 de 19 de
janeiro (Portuguese Law), Lisboa, 2024.
[4]
Ordem dos Engenheiros, Código de Ética e
Deontologia Profissional, Lisboa: Ordem dos
Engenheiros, 2016, p. 9.
[5]
D. Gotrerbarn, K. Miller and S. Rogerson,
Software Engineering Code of Ethics, Vols.
Vol. 40, No. 11, A. &. I. C. Society, Ed.,
Communications of the ACM, 1997, pp. 110-
118.
[6]
K. D. Plemmons and B. Taebi, Software
engineering code of ethics and professional
practice, vol. SCI ENG ETHICS 7, I. J. T. F. o.
S. E. E. a. P. Practices, Ed., Springer, June
2001, p. pages 231238.
[7]
A. Rego and J. Braga, Ethics for Engineers,
Lidel (Ética Para Engenheiros, Lidel), 2014,
p. 268.
[8]
Z. J. Mohammed, A. J. Alsadaji, S. F. Al-Saadi
and S. Al-Fayyadh, "Components of Soft
Skills for University Students in the 21st
Century: An Overview of Literature Review,"
Medical Education Bulletin, Vols. Vol.4, N.1,
Serial No.11, pp. 601-609, Mar. 2023.
[9]
D. A. Martin, E. Conlon and B. Bowe, "A
Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics
Education: Towards a Socio-technical
Orientation of Engineering Education for
Ethics," in Science and Engineering Ethics ,
vol. 27, 2021.
[10]
D. Singh and C. Stückelberger, Eds., Ethics in
Higher Education, vol. Education Ethics No.
1, Globethics.net, 2017.
[11]
E. Saepudin and P. Roza, "The Strategy of Soft
Skills Development in Higher Education," in
Proceedings of the Conference on Digital
Humanities 2022 (CODH 2022), Bandung,
Indonesia, November 3-5, 2022, DOI:
10.2991/978-2-494069-69-5_10.
[12]
T. R. Kuntz, Ethics in Higher Education:
Promoting Equity and Inclusion Through
Case-Based Inquiry, P. Ltd, Ed., London:
Harvard Education Press, 2022.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The article was created by a single author, and
therefore, there were no contributions from any other
author at all stages, from the formulation of the
survey to the final findings.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that
are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_
US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
137
Volume 21, 2024
APPENDIX
Table 1. Distribution of Ethics and Deontology Students
Students of Ethics and Deontology Course
Females
Males
Total
Enrollments
1st
Enroll
2nd
Enroll
3rd
Enroll
Subtotal
1st
Enroll
2nd
Enroll
3rd
Enroll
Subtotal
1st
Enroll
2nd
Enroll
3rd
Enroll
Grand
Total
Number of
Responses
4
0
8
12
13
4
77
94
21
4
92
106
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2024.21.16
Jorge Barbosa
E-ISSN: 2224-3410
138
Volume 21, 2024