Fig. 9. Voltage transmission characteristics of dual thresholds to achieve
street lamp control.
at all levels. Students will discuss and analyze, calculate
appropriate capacitance and resistance values, use Multisim
circuit simulation software for simulation and team up to
complete hardware production. The teacher guides students
to divide the curriculum knowledge into pieces, combine the
knowledge they have learned to solve practical problems,
and cultivate their ability to independently analyze circuit
principles. An example of the circuit is shown in Fig. 10. The
introduction of engineering examples is conducive to further
improving students’ ability to master and learn new knowl-
edge. In the process of circuit simulation and hardware design,
students can obtain intuitive perceptual cognition and reduce
the difficulty of abstract thinking. Implementing hierarchical
education, teaching students in accordance with their aptitude,
and expanding training content can allow students with strong
learning abilities to master more knowledge and improve
their abilities. At the same time, the model of teamwork
also provides a very good learning platform for students
with poor foundations. This active learning environment can
improve students’ self-confidence and desire for performance
[6]–[10], which greatly improves the efficiency of learning.
The importance of teaching summary is self-evident. You can
1
S
2
S
comparator
C
R
1
10k
R
3
620k
R
Fig. 10. Timing alarm circuit.
summarize and sort out the previous content, review important
knowledge, deepen students’ understanding of knowledge, and
have a positive effect on students’ full circuit design methods.
In this case, the classroom becomes a place to solve problems,
propose concepts and participate in collaborative learning.
By taking the teaching stage of voltage comparator as an
example, this article analyzes some problems in the theory,
practice and content of the electronic circuit course, and puts
forward effective methods for the problems. When teaching,
the teacher starts from the actual situation of the students, runs
through the classroom with an inquiry-based teaching method,
optimizes and innovates the content, and combines theory and
practice reasonably. The ultimate goal is to improve students’
ability to analyze and apply circuits, and train them to adapt
to the times.
The work of Hua Fan was supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant
62371109, supported by Sichuan Science and Technolo-
gy Program under Grant 2022YFG0164, supported by the
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
under Grant ZYGX2021YGLH203, supported by general
project of Chongqing Natural Science Foundation under
Grant 2022NSCQ-MSX5348, and supported by Guangdong
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation under Grant
2023A1515010041.
[1] K. Konishi, T. Tanaka, and T. Koide, “Power electronics education using
the integrated circuit consistent education system and tcad,” in Frontiers
in Education Conference, 2013.
[2] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. A. Lundeberg, and C. F. Bunting, “Problem-
based learning: Influence on students’ learning in an electrical engi-
neering course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp.
253–280, 2011.
[3] A. A. Gokhale, “Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking,”
Journal of Technology Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 1995.
[4] L. L. Watai, A. J. Brodersen, and S. P. Brophy, “[ieee 2007 37th
annual frontiers in education conference - global engineering: knowledge
without borders, opportunities without passports - milwaukee, wi, usa
(2007.10.10-2007.10.13)] 2007 37th annual frontiers in education con-
ference - global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities
without passports - designing effective laboratory courses in electrical
engineering: Challenge-based model that reflects engineering process,”
pp. F2C–7–F2C–12, 2007.
[5] W. Dehaene, G. Gielen, G. Deconinck, J. Driesen, M. Moonen,
B. Nauwelaers, C. V. Hoof, and P. Wambacq, “Circuits and systems engi-
neering education through interdisciplinary team-based design projects,”
in IEEE International Symposium of Circuits and Systems, 2011.
[6] Tien-Yu, Hsu, Chuang-Kai, Chiou, Judy, R. C., Tseng, Gwo-Jen, and
Hwang, “Development and evaluation of an active learning support
system for context-aware ubiquitous learning,” IEEE Transactions on
Learning Technologies, 2015.
[7] Jorge, E., Gomez, Juan, F., Huete, Velssy, L., and Hernandez, “A con-
textualized system for supporting active learning,” IEEE Transactions
on Learning Technologies, 2016.
[8] F. Grunewald and C. Meinel, “Implementation and evaluation of digital
e-lecture annotation in learning groups to foster active learning,” IEEE
Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 286–298, 2015.
[9] M. Dal, “Teaching electric drives control course: Incorporation of active
learning into the classroom,” pp. 459–469, 2013.
[10] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S.
Kennedy, “Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy:
A validation study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2,
pp. 366–395, 2016.
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgement
References
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI: 10.37394/232010.2023.20.12