River Restoration and Revitalisation in Urban Areas:
Exploring Opportunities for the Elassonitis River in Elassona, Greece
NIKOLAOS SAMARAS1, EVRYDIKI TSOLA2, CHRISTOS SAMARAS3, ARIS SAPOUNAKIS4
1Department of Planning and Regional Development,
University of Thessaly,
Volos,
GREECE
2Faculty of Spatial Planning, Technical University of Dortmund,
Dortmund,
GERMANY
3Department of Architecture, University of Patras,
Patras,
GREECE
4University of Thessaly,
Volos,
GREECE
Abstract: - Throughout history, the role of rivers in urban areas has been vital and complex. Water elements
have defined and embodied urban areas' structure, character, growth, economic relations, and social and
environmental dynamics. Today, local authorities focus on restoration and revitalization projects in urban rivers
as key urban elements for sustainable development. These efforts aim to enhance citizens' cultural memory and
integrate rivers as essential elements of urban environments. The paper argues the importance of water
elements in urban regeneration projects. It explores the possibilities for river restoration and revitalization
through a case study of the Elassonitis River in the urban area of Elassona, Greece. We aim to identify the
river's role in the community's life and the opportunities arising from its restoration. The methods used include
surveys with the local community. The surveys detail the community's perceptions, needs, and expectations
regarding river restoration. Lastly, it highlights the benefits of integrating water elements into urban
regeneration, including environmental, social, and economic benefits. The case study of the Elassonitis River
can influence similar projects in other regions, demonstrating the potential for rivers to become central
elements of sustainable urban development.
Key-Words: - river, restoration, revitalization, regeneration, sustainable development, urban areas, Greece.
5HFHLYHG-XQH5HYLVHG2FWREHU$FFHSWHG1RYHPEHU3XEOLVKHG'HFHPEHU
1 Introduction
Water has historically played an important role in
the structure and development of urban areas. Many
of the world's civilizations were set up near rivers,
using these water sources for subsistence and
economic growth. Rivers' proximity to urban areas
supports transport and commercial activities, vital
for economic relationships and cultural exchanges,
[1]. In addition, rivers have influenced urban areas'
cultural and artistic quality, functionality, and scale,
[2].
In Europe, urban areas are often located close to
rivers, which define the urban landscape and have
historically acted as a source of energy for industrial
activities, [3]. However, rivers also began to act as
landmarks for urban areas, with buildings of
significant architectural importance often located
close to them. This contributed to the city's cultural
identity, [4].
Greece is characterized by diverse and highly
fragmented smallto medium-sized rivers and
streams flowing through steep, narrow valleys.
However, settlements were established in dry
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
745
Volume 20, 2024
climates to reduce the risks associated with diseases
and extreme weather conditions, such as floods,
intense rainfall events, and sudden snow or melt in
high mountainous areas, [5].
In recent years, rapid urbanization and climate
change have led to significant transformations of
riversides in urban areas, [6]. These efforts
primarily address social and environmental issues,
contributing to and increasing the resilience of the
river environment and broader urban areas, [7].
Modern water legislation aims to protect and
restore rivers and their surroundings through
sustainable water resource management, [8].
However, urban rivers are also prone to pollution
that is related to household and industrial waste, [9].
Restoration of river ecosystems, enhancement of
cultural and recreational value, improvement of
water quality, development of green infrastructure,
and adaptation to climate change are among the key
outcomes of these revitalization and restoration
projects, [10]. Riverside revitalization and
restoration can be traced back to the regeneration
projects in Paris in the 19th century. These projects
aimed to revitalize degraded riverbanks by creating
open green spaces and enhancing the quality of
urban life within urban areas, [11]. As various
scholars have demonstrated, rivers across the globe
have been characterized by pollution and
deterioration, [12]. The prevailing approach was
transforming these spaces into new central areas to
influence urban fabrics through regeneration
projects. Western European countries, including
Germany, France, the UK, Spain, and the
Netherlands, promoted riverfront regeneration
projects to improve the rivers and their surrounding
areas, [13].
One of the most comparable examples of a river
restoration project is the River Skerne in the UK. It
was conducted by the River Restoration Project
(RRP) between 1995 and 1998. The restoration
project aimed to transform the abandoned urban
industrial landscape into a riverside that the local
community could use. The restoration focused on
river morphology, using historical maps to guide the
reintroduction of natural features. It is essential to
mention that the restoration involved various
organizations and stakeholders to ensure the river's
aesthetic character and functionality, [14]. Another
case is the Emscher River restoration project in the
Ruhr Metropolitan Area, Germany, which aimed to
transform the river from a heavily modified
wastewater channel into a near-natural stream
system. The project started in 1990; the 30-year
project is driven by the need to comply with the
European Water Framework Directive and enhance
the river system's ecological and human benefits,
[15]. In this project, several public engagement
strategies were implemented. These comprise
interactive areas along the river, information events,
entertainment events, and follow-up information
disseminated via various online platforms. These
initiatives aim to inform and involve the local
community, thereby raising general awareness about
water management, [16].
Based on the above, participatory approaches
are essential for incorporating diverse stakeholder
perspectives and identifying collaborative solutions
best suited for local cultures and societies. The
involvement of different actors, especially the local
community, can achieve better local economic and
social outcomes, enhanced livelihoods,
and mitigation of climate change, [17].
Fig. 1: The riverside of Elassonitis River
Our case study is about Elassona, a town in the
southern region of Thessaly, Greece, located at the
base of Mount Othrys. The municipality is primarily
rural but also has some urban characteristics. The
Elassonitis River, an important tributary of the
Pineios River, divides the town of Elassona into two
districts: the historic old city and the new town. The
river plays a vital role in the Elassona environment,
as its riverside includes diverse flora and fauna,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
746
Volume 20, 2024
[18]. In addition, the river is linked to significant
architectural and cultural elements of interest, such
as the Stone Bridge and the Muslim Mosque.
However, several issues, such as flooding and
pollution from local industries, have affected the
river. Furthermore, some riverside parts are vacant,
abandoned, and inaccessible to the local community.
The lack of restoration and management affects the
local economy, environment, and social fabric, [19].
Our paper aims to examine the potential
opportunities and strengths of the Elassonitis River
in Greece, focusing on the perspectives of the local
community. In particular, surveys were conducted
with the local community to gain insight into the
complex issues that are arising in the city of
Elassona due to the river and to ascertain the river's
role in the local community.
2 Methodology
The methodology carried out was field research,
which is a qualitative method involving direct
observations in the case study area and interactions
with participants, [20]. This method focuses on the
possibilities of upgrading the centers of settlements
through the exploitation of the water element,
through typical examples in Greece and abroad, and
fieldwork that concerns the detection of the opinions
of residents, entrepreneurs, and visitors of the city in
the direction of exploring the potential of the
Elassonitis River in Elassona, Greece, and the
expectations of citizens from the regeneration of the
river. The results based on the interviews will be
analyzed through a correlation test that will be
carried out between the responses of the citizens,
visitors, and entrepreneurs. The One-Way ANOVA
method was used, applying Tukey's test, [21].
The survey consists of two phases. During
Phase A of the research, a 12-question structured
questionnaire was addressed to a random sample of
35 visitors, 35 residents, and 20 entrepreneurs
(Table 1) of the city of Elassona in September 2020,
and it was completed face-to-face in the city of
Elassona.
The questionnaire was repeated in Phase B,
from 26/1 to 6/2/2021, to record possible changes in
participants' perception of the Elassonitis River due
to the mobility and publicity surrounding the
announcement of the Architectural Competition for
the riverside redevelopment. Due to the emergency
measures in place to limit the transmission of
COVID-19, this second Phase was completed by
completing an online questionnaire using Google
Forms. A total of 291 questionnaires were
answered: 181 from residents of Elassona, 88 from
visitors to the city, and 22 from entrepreneurs of the
town.
Table 1. Questionnaire for the residents, the
entrepreneurs, and the visitors of the city of
Elassona
Questionnaire for the
residents of the city
Questionnaire for the
visitors to the city
Demographic Information
Questions regarding the gender, age, and the
educational level
Questions About Living in
Elassona
Questions About Visiting
Elassona
Were you born in
Elassona? If not, why did
you move to Elassona?
How long have you lived
in Elassona?
Where do you live? Why
did you visit Elassona?
(Please specify the purpose
of your visit)
In which neighborhood do
you live in Elassona?
How many times have you
visited the city of
Elassona?
What do you like about the city of Elassona?
What do you dislike about the city of Elassona?
Would you recommend living in the city of Elassona to
someone else?
Would you recommend visiting the city of Elassona to
someone else?
City Characteristics
Could you specify seven important characteristics
related to the city of Elassona?
Elassonitis River
Does the Elassonitis River play a vital role in the
character of the city? If yes, why?
What would you like to be maintained or preserved in
the Elassonitis River during the
restoration/revitalization process?
What is the most distracting or annoying thing for you
about the Elassonitis River that should be changed in
the revitalization process?
How often do you visit the Elassonitis River? (e.g.,
very often, rarely, etc.)
What uses would you like to see the riverside gain
through the revitalization/restoration process? (e.g.,
public space, athletic facilities, cultural and artistic
venues)
Would you like to add any comments or suggestions
regarding the Elassonitis River?
The Phase A questionnaire, completed in
person, was structured in two distinct parts. Part 1
was about Elassona, while Part 2 was about the
Elassonitis River and its imminent regeneration. The
questions of Part 2 of the Questionnaire: "What
would you like to be maintained or preserved in the
Elassonitis River during the restoration
/revitalization process?" and "What is the most
distracting or annoying thing for you about the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
747
Volume 20, 2024
Elassonitis River?", in the process of a
redevelopment, were 'open-ended' and allowed for a
spontaneous response, freely formulated by the
respondents, residents, visitors and entrepreneurs of
the city. We asked the respondents to tell us what
they thought were the best and worst things about
the Elassonitis River.
The six answers that gathered the highest
percentages among the answers of Phase A to the
question about the Positive Elements of the
Elassonitis River were the six choices in the
corresponding question of Phase B, which was now
formulated as a closed-ended questionnaire since the
impossibility of completing the questionnaire by the
face-to-face procedure could not ensure conditions
of spontaneity in the answers. Similarly, the seven
responses that scored the highest percentages among
the reactions of Phase A to the question on the
Negative Elements of the Elassonitis River
constituted the seven choices in the corresponding
closed-ended question of Phase B.
The IBM SPSS Statistics statistical processing
program was utilized to analyse the results of the
respondents' answers and characteristics
combinations to identify statistically significant
correlations. Correlation tests were conducted to
ascertain the relationship between the responses of
the three groups.
3 Results
The questions in Part 2 of the questionnaire: "What
would you like to be maintained or preserved in the
Elassonitis River during the
restoration/revitalization process?" and "What is the
most distracting or annoying thing for you about the
Elassonitis River that should be changed in the
revitalization process?" were 'open-ended' and
allowed for a spontaneous response. The statistical
analysis of the reactions is reflected below in Table
2, Table 3, Table 4 and Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5
(for positive items) and in Table 5, Table 6, Table 7
and Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 (for negative items)
for the Elassonitis River. Thus, among the responses
of the city residents, in terms of what they like most
about the Elassonitis River and would like to see
preserved in the process of an upcoming
redevelopment, 'The Riverside Vegetation' emerged
1st with 45%, 2nd 'The Stone Bridge' with 26%, 3rd
'The Natural Element' with 23% and 4th 'The Water
Element' with 3%. 3% of respondents answered 'No
Element'. Among the responses of visitors to the
city, in terms of what they like most about the
Elassonitis River and would like to see preserved in
the process of an upcoming revitalisation, 'The
Stone Bridge' was ranked 1st with a percentage of
31%, along with 'The Riverside Vegetation' and
'The Natural Element' in 2nd place with a
percentage of 29% and 'The Water Element' in 4th
place with a percentage of 3%. A percentage of 5%
of the respondents answered 'Never Heard of It', and
3% of the respondents answered 'No Element'.
Among the responses of the city's entrepreneurs, in
terms of what they like most about the Elassonitis
River and would like to see preserved in the process
of an upcoming redevelopment, 'The Riverside
Vegetation' was ranked 1st with 40%, 'The Natural
Element' was ranked 2nd with 30%, and 'The Stone
Bridge' was ranked 3rd with 20%. A percentage of
10% of respondents answered 'No Element'.
Table 2. The positive elements of the river should be
preserved during its redevelopment, according to
residents
Frequency
Percent
9
26%
16
45%
8
23%
1
3%
1
3%
35
100%
Fig. 3: The positive elements of the river that should
be preserved during its redevelopment, according to
residents.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
748
Volume 20, 2024
Table 3. The positive elements of the river should be
preserved during its redevelopment, according to
visitors
Element
Frequency
Percent
The Stone Bridge
11
31%
The Riverside
Vegetation
10
29%
The Natural Element
10
29%
The Water Element
1
3%
Never Heard of It
2
5%
No Element
1
3%
Total
35
100%
Fig. 4: The positive elements of the river that should
be preserved during its redevelopment, according to
visitors
Table 4. The positive elements of the river should be
preserved during its redevelopment, according to
entrepreneurs
Element
Frequency
Percent
The Stone Bridge
4
20%
The Riverside
Vegetation
8
40%
The Natural Element
6
30%
No Element
2
10%
Total
20
100%
Fig. 5: The positive elements of the river that should
be preserved during its redevelopment, according to
entrepreneurs
As for the responses of the residents and visitors
of the city, the statistical correlations (x²) gave no
result to indicate that: "What they would like to be
maintained or preserved in the Elassonitis River
during the restoration/revitalization process" relates
to some of the "characteristics of the interviewed
residents/visitors". The gender, age, occupation, and
level of education of the interviewed residents and
visitors did not differentiate the answers. With
regard to the responses of the entrepreneurs in the
city, the statistical correlation (x²) was unable to
demonstrate a relationship between the desire to
maintain or preserve aspects of the Elassonitis River
during the restoration and revitalization process and
the type of economic activity.
Regarding what is most distracting in the
Elassonitis River and should be corrected in the
process of an upcoming redevelopment, among the
residents of the city, 'The Industrial Pollution' and
'The Lack of Cleanliness' came in 1st place with a
combined 34%, 'The Difficulty of Access' came in
3rd with 17%, 'The Unsteady Water Flow' came in
4th with 12%, and 'The City Divide' came in 5th
with 3%. Among the responses from visitors to the
city, in terms of what is most disturbing about the
Elassonitis River that they would like to see
corrected in the process of an upcoming
redevelopment, 'The Unsteady Water Flow' came
1st with 34%, 2nd 'The Lack of Cleanliness' with
25%, 3rd 'The Difficulty of Access' with 14%, 4th
'The Industrial Pollution' with 9%, 5th 'The
Unsightly Image' with 3%. A percentage of 6% of
the respondents answered 'Never Heard of It', and
9% of the respondents answered 'No Element'.
Among the responses of the entrepreneurs, in terms
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
749
Volume 20, 2024
of what is most distracting about the Elassonitis
River and what they would like to see changed
during the process of an upcoming redevelopment,
'The Unsteady Water Flow' emerged 1st with a
percentage of 30% along with 'The Industrial
Pollution' and 'The Difficulty of Access' in 2nd
place with 20%, 'The Unsightly Image' in 4th place
with 15%, 'The Lack of Cleanliness' in 5th place
with 10% and 'The City Divide' in 6th place with
5%.
Table 5. The negative elements of the river should
be preserved during its redevelopment, according to
residents
Element
Frequency
Percent
The Industrial Pollution
12
34%
The Lack of
Cleanliness
12
34%
The City Divide
1
3%
The Difficulty of
Access
6
17%
The Unsteady Water
Flow
4
12%
Total
35
100%
Fig. 6: The negative elements of the river that
should be preserved during its redevelopment,
according to residents
Table 6. The negative elements of the river should
be preserved during its redevelopment, according to
visitors
Element
Frequency
Percent
The Industrial Pollution
3
9%
The Lack of Cleanliness
9
25%
The Difficulty of Access
5
14%
The Unsteady Water
Flow
12
34%
Never Heard of It
2
6%
The Unsightly Image
1
3%
No Element
3
9%
Total
35
100%
Fig. 7: The negative elements of the river that
should be preserved during its redevelopment,
according to visitors
Table 7. The negative elements of the river should
be preserved during its redevelopment, according to
entrepreneurs
Element
Frequency
Percent
The Industrial Pollution
4
20%
The Lack of Cleanliness
2
10%
The City Divide
1
5%
The Difficulty of
Access
4
20%
The Unsteady Water
Flow
6
30%
The Unsightly Image
3
15%
Total
20
100%
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
750
Volume 20, 2024
Fig. 8: The negative elements of the river that
should be preserved during its redevelopment,
according to entrepreneurs
Regarding the answers of the residents and
visitors of the city referring to the harmful elements
of the river, the statistical correlations (x²) gave no
result to indicate that: "What they consider as most
distracting in the Elassonitis River and should be
corrected in the process of an upcoming
redevelopment" relates to some of the
"characteristics of the interviewed
residents/visitors". The gender, age, occupation, and
level of education of the interviewed residents and
visitors did not differentiate the answers. As for the
responses of the entrepreneurs of the city, the
statistical correlation (x²) did not work to show that:
"What they consider as most distracting in the
Elassonitis River and should be corrected in the
process of an upcoming redevelopment" relates to
"the type of economic activity".
When the entrepreneurs of the city were asked
the question: 'Do you think that the existence of the
Elassonitis river helps in some way to carry out your
business activity?' out of a total of 20 entrepreneurs
interviewed, only 2 (10%) answered YES and 18
(90%) answered NO. Interestingly, the next 'open-
ended' question is: 'Do you think the Elassonitis
River, once redeveloped, could contribute to your
business? If YES, in what way?', among the 18
entrepreneurs who answered NO to the previous
question, 10 (56%) answered 'By attracting
customers', 2 (11%) answered 'By expanding
commercial activity to the countryside', and 6 (33%)
said that they did not think that the river could
contribute to their business activity 'But they want it
to be redeveloped' (Figure 9).
Table 8. The contribution of the Elassonitis River,
once redeveloped, to business activity, according to
entrepreneurs
Way of contribution
Frequency
Percent
The redevelopment
Will Attract Customers
10
56%
By Expanding
Commercial Activity to
the Countryside
2
11%
Will not Assist me But I
Want it to be
Redeveloped
6
33%
Total
18
100%
Fig. 9. The contribution of the Elassonitis River,
once redeveloped, to business activity, according to
entrepreneurs
A correlation test was conducted between the
responses of the residents, visitors, and
entrepreneurs to analyze the results of the three
groups of respondents to the questions concerning
the perceived positive and negative aspects of the
Elassonitis River (Table 8). The One-Way ANOVA
method was used, applying Tukey's test (Table 9).
The comparison between the responses of the three
groups of respondents indicated statistically
significant differences in the question concerning
the negative elements of the river, between the
responses of residents and visitors, and between
residents and entrepreneurs, but no statistically
significant differences between the reactions of
visitors and entrepreneurs.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
751
Volume 20, 2024
Table 9. Multiple Comparisons between the
responses of the three groups of respondents
(residents/group 1, visitors/group 2, and
entrepreneurs/group 3), about the Positive aspects
and the Negative elements of the Elassonitis River,
using the One-Way ANOVA method and applying
Tukey's test
The comparison between the answers of the
three groups of participants did not reveal any
statistically significant differences in the question
concerning the Positive aspects of the river. Indeed,
among the answers of all three groups of
respondents (residents, entrepreneurs, and visitors of
the city), regarding what they like most about the
Elassonitis River and would not want to see lost in
the process of a forthcoming redevelopment, the
first three positions emerged with exceptionally high
percentages (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Figure 1,
Figure 2 and Figure 3), 'The Riverside Vegetation'
(45% of residents, 40% of entrepreneurs, 29% of
visitors), 'The Natural Element' (30% of
entrepreneurs, 29% of visitors, 23% of residents),
and 'The Stone Bridge' (31% of visitors, 26% of
residents, 20% of entrepreneurs).
The observed increase in the percentage of
responses 'The Riverside Vegetation', 'The Stone
Bridge', 'The Natural Element' and 'The Water
Element', and the corresponding decrease in the
responses 'Never Heard of It' and 'No Element',
from Phase A to Phase B, may not necessarily
represent a change in people's perception of the
Elassonitis River, due to the mobility and publicity
surrounding the announcement of the Architectural
Competition for the redevelopment of the river's
riparian zone, and may be because these options
were now among the proposed six responses.
However, it is noteworthy that there is a
convergence among the three groups of respondents
(residents, entrepreneurs, and visitors to the city) in
their top 3 responses in terms of what they like most
about the Elassonitis River and would not want to
see it lost in the process of an upcoming
redevelopment.
4 Discussion
The relationship between rivers, cities, and
surrounding landscapes has evolved. Rivers have
consistently played a vital role in freshwater
provision, sewage disposal, irrigation,
transportation, and defense. People have frequently
used rivers for specific needs, [22]. In the
contemporary era, rivers are connected to leisure
activities, societal norms, and cultural aspects within
urban environments, [23]. However, several issues
have emerged regarding riversides that need to be
considered. The literature shows the importance of
restoration and regeneration projects in riverside
areas, addressing the challenges posed by climate
change and high-density urbanization and providing
suitable living environments and urban spaces, [24].
This paper aimed to examine the potential for
restoration and revitalization of the Elassonitis River
in Elassona, Greece. To this end, field research was
conducted, focusing on surveys of the citizens of
Elassona, the local entrepreneurs, and visitors to the
area. The surveys tried to investigate the role of the
Elassonitis River in the urban environment, its
connection with other elements, and its strengths
and weaknesses, as perceived by the participants.
Exploring the views of residents and
entrepreneurs on "what they want their city to be
like in the future" is a prerequisite for determining
the objective goals of city marketing, [25]. The
British and broader European experience highlights
the vital role that civil society plays in the spaces
that people manage. These places develop through
use - rather than based on function - that promote
inclusive collaboration and participation, are open to
new members, and have the infrastructure for
bottom-up management, [26]. Moreover, the
involvement of residents in the place branding
process is considered necessary, with three different
roles they play: as an integral part of the place
through their characteristics and behavior, as
ambassadors with unquestioned credibility in
communicating the message, and as citizens and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
752
Volume 20, 2024
voters for political legitimacy. These three roles
make residents a significant target group since only
conscious participation and consultation can
produce effective and sustainable - rather than an
'artificial' - place branding, which utilizes and
reinforces, among other things, a lived - rather than
an invented tradition, [27], [28]. They are also
prerequisites for marketing as a long-term process: a
collective understanding and appreciation of
place/city marketing and the achievement of broad
cooperation with a clear division of roles, [29].
The findings of the field research showed that
the necessity of restoration and regeneration of the
riverside of Elassonitis is perceived by all
participants. Residents and visitors of the city of
Elassona expect, through an upcoming
redevelopment of the river, the improvement and
correction of negative elements such as 'Industrial
Pollution', 'Lack of Cleanliness', 'Difficulty of
Access', Unstable Water Flow', 'The Division of the
City'. The entrepreneurs of the city, even if they do
not believe that the river, after redevelopment, could
contribute to their business activity, 'Want it to be
Redeveloped'.
As in other case studies worldwide, the local
community and visitors recognized the riverside's
strengths and weaknesses within the urban area and
identified interactions between the natural and the
built environments, [24]. In particular, the
environmental elements, including the water
element, native vegetation, fauna, and flora, are
noteworthy and require maintenance and protection.
Furthermore, the participants acknowledged the
significance of the area's cultural heritage,
particularly the stone bridge as a prominent
landmark and an integral component of the riverside
landscape. Consequently, the cultural reclamation of
the river by connecting the riverside with the
cultural heritage of the area through paths and
public spaces can enhance the attractiveness of the
area and give a new image to the city of Elassona.
On the other hand, the survey participants
highlighted concerns regarding industrial and
household pollution in the riverside, as well as the
lack of cleanliness and accessibility in the riverside
area. All of these characteristics that have affected
the riversides are incorporated into restoration and
regeneration programs.
The waterfront areas should be designated as
recreational zones. The principal means of
achieving this objective can be categorized as
follows: firstly, the ecological functionality of the
watercourse as an ecosystem should be enhanced;
secondly, flood protection should be provided;
thirdly, the residential, cultural, and recreational
value of the area should be increased; and fourthly,
permanently sustainable use of watercourses and
their river valleys should be secured, [30].
Last but not least, it is crucial to emphasize the
significance of the involvement of civil society,
public administration, and individual citizens in
urban restoration and regeneration projects. The
decentralization of collective decision-making
throughout all societal levels, including local
communities, enables the acquisition of
participatory skills. This, in turn, facilitates effective
participation in the formulation of decisions that
affect these communities, as well as the
achievement of their aspirations and the
strengthening of the community fabric, [31].
5 Conclusion
This research aimed to explore the relationships,
influences, and opportunities arising from the
restoration and revitalization of rivers in urban
areas.
The study's results showed that most
participants recognize the riverside's ecological
features as strengths and opportunities to be
considered in the restoration and revitalization
process. Nevertheless, the riverside's pollution,
caused by the area's industries, and the lack of
accessibility and cleanliness are some of the
weaknesses that the participants have identified.
The restoration and revitalization of rivers
present challenges and opportunities important to
urban areas' sustainable development and resilience.
Due to their economic, cultural, and environmental
benefits, rivers have always been important for the
growth and development of civilizations. However,
several challenges have been created in urban areas,
such as rapid urbanization, and climate change,
which should be addressed with a holistic approach
based on the principles of sustainable development.
In particular, it is important to prioritize the
following objectives:
Ecological restoration
Enhancement of cultural and recreational
values
Improvement of water quality
Development of green infrastructure and
adaptation to climate change
Regarding river restoration projects, our case
study could showcase the importance of community
involvement and the influence of public opinion.
Future regeneration projects should examine the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
753
Volume 20, 2024
connection between the intervention area, the
surrounding area, and the main transport axes.
Furthermore, the integration of cultural and
historical elements should be considered. It is
essential to respect the landscape's character,
especially the role of ecosystems in the waterfront
areas, and to manage them sustainably. It's also
important to recognize the area's history, including
how we preserve and integrate some notable urban
elements. The materials used in the intervention
should be environmentally friendly and mitigate the
high temperatures. Bioclimatic design approaches
should ensure comfort and cooling conditions while
avoiding effects such as glare from material
reflections.
The present study has limitations. In particular,
we did not have the opportunity to collect as many
questionnaires as planned due to the COVID-19
restrictions. Lastly, given the methodological
challenges involved, further research should focus
on the impact of local community participation in
river restoration and regeneration projects.
Acknowledgement:
We would like to express our gratitude to all the
participants of the survey, as well as the public
administration, for their invaluable contributions to
the research process.
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted
Technologies in the Writing Process
During the preparation of this work the authors used
Grammarly for language editing. After using this
service, the authors reviewed and edited the content
as needed and take full responsibility for the content
of the publication.
References:
[1] L. H. Phong, ‘The Relationship Between
Rivers And Cities: Influences Of Urbanization
On The Riverine Zones A Case Study Of
Red River Zones In Hanoi, Vietnam’,
Sustainable Development and Planning, vol.
193, pp. 2743, 2015.
[2] E. Abshirini and D. Koch, ‘Rivers as
integration devices in cities’, City, Territory
and Architecture, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi:
10.1186/s40410-016-0030-4.
[3] European Environment Agency, ‘Rivers and
lakes in European cities’, European
Environment Agency, [Online].
https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/rivers
-and-lakes-in-cities (Accessed Date: June 26,
2024).
[4] M. Al Ani, ‘Place Identity in Defining Urban
Space of Border Rivers in Historical City
Centres’, University of Baghdad Engineering
Journal, ISSN: 1726-4073, vol. 20, no. 2, pp.
150168, 2014, doi:
10.31026/j.eng.2014.02.11.
[5] Mariolakos, I.D.. Ancient Greece and Water:
Climatic Changes, Extreme Events, Water
Management, and Rivers in Ancient Greece.
In: Skoulikidis, N., Dimitriou, E., Karaouzas,
I. (eds) The Rivers of Greece. The Handbook
of Environmental Chemistry, vol 59. Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017,
https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_474.
[6] M. Scott, M. Lennon, D. Haase, A.
Kazmierczak, G. Clabby, and T. Beatley,
‘Nature-based solutions for the contemporary
city/Re-naturing the city/Reflections on urban
landscapes, ecosystems services and nature-
based solutions in cities/Multifunctional green
infrastructure and climate change adaptation:
brownfield greening as an adaptation strategy
for vulnerable communities?/Delivering green
infrastructure through planning: insights from
practice in Fingal, Ireland/Planning for
biophilic cities: from theory to practice’,
Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 17, no. 2,
pp. 267300, 2016, doi:
10.1080/14649357.2016.1158907.
[7] P. Veelen, ‘Developing Resilient Urban
Waterfronts: Integrating Adaptation into
Urban Development and Management’, pp.
189218, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-
16759-2_9.
[8] J. Sendzimir and S. Schmutz, ‘Challenges in
Riverine Ecosystem Management’, in
Riverine Ecosystem Management: Science for
Governing Towards a Sustainable Future, S.
Schmutz and J. Sendzimir, Eds., Cham:
Springer International Publishing, pp. 116,
2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_1.
[9] F. Mihai, L. Apostol, A. Ursu, and P. Ichim,
‘Vulnerability of mountain rivers to waste
dumping from Neamț County,
Romania_Geographia Napocensis’,
Geographia Napocensis, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 51
59, 2012, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19126.
[10] L. Shi, S. Maruthaveeran, and M. J. Mohd
Yusof, The Usage and Constraints of Urban
River Corridor from a Socio-ecological
Perspective: a Systematic Review: A
Systematic Review’, Landscape Online, p.
1121, 2024, doi: 10.3097/LO.2024.1121.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
754
Volume 20, 2024
[11] K. Andersen, Spatial Equity in River Access.
Measuring the Public Space Potential of
Urban Riverbanks in Valdivia, Chile’,
International Journal of Sustainable
Development and Planning, vol. 17, no. 1, pp.
112, 2022, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.170101.
[12] R. K. Mishra, S. S. Mentha, Y. Misra, and N.
Dwivedi, ‘Emerging pollutants of severe
environmental concern in water and
wastewater: A comprehensive review on
current developments and future research’,
Water-Energy Nexus, vol. 6, pp. 7495, 2023,
doi: 10.1016/j.wen.2023.08.002.
[13] J. Tort-Donada, A. Santasusagna, S. Rode,
and M. T. Vadrí, ‘Bridging the gap between
city and water: A review of urban-river
regeneration projects in France and Spain’,
Science of The Total Environment, vol. 700, p.
134460, 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134460.
[14] J. Prior, ‘Urban river design and aesthetics: a
river restoration case study from the UK’,
Journal of Urban Design, vol. 21, no. 4, pp.
118, 2016, doi:
10.1080/13574809.2016.1187557.
[15] N. V. Gerner, I. Nafo, C. Winking, K.
Wencki, C. Strehl, T. Wortberg, A. Niemann,
G. Anzaldua, M. Lago, S. Birk., ‘Large-scale
river restoration pays off: A case study of
ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher
restoration generation project’, Ecosystem
Services, vol. 30, part B, pp. 327338, 2018,
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.020.
[16] J. Euler and S. Heldt, ‘From information to
participation and self-organization: Visions
for European river basin management’,
Science of The Total Environment, vol. 621,
no. 1, pp. 905914, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.072.
[17] S. Moore, ‘Researching Local Development
Cultures: Using the Qualitative Interview as
an Interpretive Lens’, International Planning
Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 390406, 2015,
doi: 10.1080/13563475.2015.1034253.
[18] N. Dimitrios, T. Souzana, and P. Stavroula,
‘Arch Stone Bridges: Procedures for
Evaluation of Structural Integrity’,
International Journal of Architectural
Heritage, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 14841504, 2023,
doi: 10.1080/15583058.2022.2042624.
[19] S. Sboras, S. Pavlides, A. Kilias, D.
Galanakis, A. Chatziioannou, and A.
Chatzipetros, ‘The Geological Structure and
Tectonic Complexity of Northern Thessaly
That Hosted the March 2021 Seismic Crisis’,
Geotechnics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 935960, 2022,
doi: 10.3390/geotechnics2040044.
[20] A. Tosun, A. Basar, B. Çağlayan, G. Çalikli,
and B. Turhan, ‘Field Studies’, in
Recommendation Systems in Software
Engineering, pp. 329355, 2014, doi:
10.1007/978-3-642-45135-5_13.
[21] A. Nanda, A. Mahapatra, and B. Mohapatra,
‘Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s
honestly significant difference (HSD): Do the
confident level control type I error’,
International Journal of Applied Mathematics
and Statistics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5965, 2021,
doi: 10.22271/maths.2021.v6.i1a.636.
[22] C. Hein, M. D’Agostino, C. Donkor, and Z.
Sliwinska, ‘Rivers as Connectors of Culture
and Nature’, Blue Papers, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6
9, 2024, doi: 10.58981/bluepapers.2024.1.ed.
[23] E. Anderson, S. Jackson, R.Tharme, M.
Douglas, J.Flotemersch, M.Zwarteveen, Chi
cu Lokgariwar, Mariana Montoya, Alaka
Wali, G. Tipa, T. Jardine, J. Olden, Lin
Cheng, J. Conallin, B. Cosens, C.
Dickens, D. Garrick, D. Groenfeldt, J.
Kabogo, D. Roux, A. Ruhí, A. Arthington,
‘Understanding rivers and their social
relations: A critical step to advance
environmental water management’, WIREs.
Water, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1-21, 2019.
[24] M. B. Schlee, K. R. Tamminga, and V. R.
Tangari, ‘A Method for Gauging Landscape
Change as a Prelude to Urban Watershed
Regeneration: The Case of the Carioca River,
Rio de Janeiro’, Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 9,
pp. 20542098, 2012, doi:
10.3390/su4092054.
[25] P. Kotler, C. Asplund, I. Rein, and D. Haider,
Marketing Places Europe: How to Attract
Investments, Industries, Residents and
Visitors to Cities, Communities, Regions, and
Nations in Europe. Financial Times, London,
1999.
[26] R. Gower, ‘People-managed places’, Journal
of Place Management and Development, vol.
1, no. 3, pp. 315321, 2008, doi:
10.1108/17538330810911299.
[27] E. Braun, M. Kavaratzis, and S. Zenker, ‘My
city - my brand: The different roles of
residents in place branding’, Journal of Place
Management and Development, vol. 6, no. 1,
pp. 18-28 2013, doi:
10.1108/17538331311306087.
[28] E. J. Hobsbawm, Ed., The invention of
tradition, Canto ed., 18. print. in Canto.
Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
755
Volume 20, 2024
[29] M. Kavaratzis and G. J. Ashworth, ‘Place
marketing: How did we get here and where
are we going?’, Journal of Place Management
and Development, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 150165,
Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1108/17538330810889989.
[30] T. Alokhina, ‘Rivers revitalisation:
approaches to decision’, E3S Web of
Conferences, vol. 166, no. 2, p. 01010, 2020,
doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202016601010.
[31] H. Sanoff, ‘Community participation in
riverfront development’, CoDesign:
International Journal of CoCreation in
Design and the Arts, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6178,
2010, doi: 10.1080/15710880512331326022.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed to the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
Report potential sources of funding if there are
any
The research project "Investigation of the
possibilities of upgrading the Elassonitis River, in
the city of Elassona" (Greece, October 2020 -
February 2021), was funded by the Municipality of
Elassona, with the administrative cooperation of the
Special Account for Research Funds of the
University of Thessaly.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.71
Nikolaos Samaras, Evrydiki Tsola,
Christos Samaras, Aris Sapounakis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
756
Volume 20, 2024