The Role of Innovative Technologies in Reducing the Load on
Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Cities of the Republic of
Kazakhstan
LYDIA BEKENOVA1, AKSANA PANZABEKOVA2, IRINA SHTYKOVA3,
NATALIA KUZMINA3
1Almaty University of Humanities and Economics,
Almaty,
REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
2Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Economics of the Republic of Kazakhstan
REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
3Rudny Industrial University,
Kostanay Region, Rudny,
REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
Abstract: - This article highlights an important aspect of modern management of urban wastewater treatment
plants in the cities of the Republic of Kazakhstan, focusing on economic assessment of the effectiveness of
integrated use of ecosystem solutions for surface (atmospheric) water collection. The study presents an analysis
of the impact of such solutions on reducing the burden on wastewater treatment plants and optimizing operating
costs. The authors consider different technologies and methods for surface water harvesting, including the use
of green spaces, ecosystem elements, and innovative engineering solutions. The paper emphasizes the
importance of considering economic aspects when deciding on the implementation of such ecosystem
approaches. It presents examples of countries that have implemented, or are currently implementing integrated
surface water management and the methods of ecosystem solutions that have shown the most positive
ecological and economic effects after their implementation. In addition, the work considers and calculates the
main components and concentrations of pollutants entering water bodies from urban areas. The authors
conclude that the integrated use of ecosystem solutions for surface water harvesting is a promising approach
that will not only reduce the burden on wastewater treatment plants but also contribute to the creation of more
sustainable and cost-effective water management systems in the cities of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Key-Words: - Ecosystem, atmosphere, ecosystem elements, water bodies, integrated management, treatment
plants, surface (atmospheric) waters, concentrations of pollutants.
Received: May 16, 2024. Revised: September 27, 2024. Accepted: October 29, 2024. Published: November 26, 2024.
1 Introduction
Water is one of the most important natural
resources, both for human domestic needs and as a
habitat for a wide range of organisms. However,
population growth, industrial development,
agricultural expansion, and infrastructure
improvements are increasing the challenges of
water supply. The effective management of
atmospheric water is becoming increasingly
important for the infrastructure of cities and for the
safety of their inhabitants.
There are a number of problems with the
sewerage system in Kazakhstan, particularly in the
small towns and rural areas. This article highlights
the main methods of atmospheric water disposal
and analyses the status of the country's wastewater
treatment facilities. It also presents methods of
reducing the burden on wastewater treatment plants
using innovative technologies. A lack of organized
drainage of atmospheric water can lead to flooding
of streets and disruption of traffic and pedestrian
movement, as well as destruction of road surfaces
and deterioration of sanitary conditions. It is
therefore important to pay special attention to water
management issues when planning and rebuilding
urban and industrial facilities.
The drainage system in residential and
industrial areas has evolved with the development
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
672
Volume 20, 2024
of infrastructure and the improvement of local
amenities.
Depending on the volume of wastewater and
the organization's costs, one can choose different
types of storm drainage. They include open, closed,
and combined options. Open systems are outdoor
networks of open channels with protective grates,
often made of plastic or concrete, and are mainly
used in pedestrian areas or on roads in historic city
centers. Closed systems, on the other hand, involve
the use of inlets and underground pipework and are
recommended for large cities because of their
durability and safety. Combined systems unite the
advantages of both types. Depending on the
connection and treatment requirements, connection
to the systems can be centralized, local, or a
combination of the two. In world practice, there are
three types of surface wastewater harvesting:
combined, separate and semi-separate systems, [1].
The original type of sewer system that was
used in cities is combined. Nowadays, it is mainly
used in historical parts of cities. It is characterized
by the fact that all types of wastewater are
discharged into a single sewerage network to a
common treatment plant. During periods of heavy
rainfall, water can be discharged into water basins
to reduce the load on the system. However, this
approach is not always in line with the principles of
sustainable urban development and environmental
safety.
Separate sewerage systems use distinct
pipelines to segregate domestic, industrial, and
rainwater sewage. There are two types of such
systems: complete and incomplete. The main
difference between them is whether the rainwater is
treated or not.
In the case of an incomplete separate system,
rainwater can be discharged directly into the water
body through the ground or special holes in the
pipes.
A semi-separate wastewater system is an
infrastructure designed to collect and dispose of
wastewater by combining rainwater and domestic
wastewater into a single network for further
disposal. Such systems may include elements of
both a combined system (where rainwater and
domestic wastewater are combined) and a separate
system (where the sewers are separated). Semi-
separate systems are often used in older sections of
cities where limited space makes it difficult to
create separate networks for rainwater and
domestic wastewater collection, [2], [3].
In semi-separate storm drainage, domestic and
industrial wastewater is combined into one
collector, while rainwater is directed to a separate
collector. This method helps to relieve the system
during periods of heavy rainfall by separating the
flow and improving the efficiency of surface water
treatment. The system redistributes part of the
precipitation to a collector with domestic and
industrial wastewater through special separation
chambers.
According to the Water Code and the
Environmental Code of the Republic of
Kazakhstan, it is prohibited to discharge untreated
rainwater, snowmelt, and irrigation water from
agricultural areas and enterprises into water bodies,
[4]. The most polluted portion of surface runoff
from rain, snowmelt, and road washing must be
directed to treatment facilities. At least 70% of the
annual runoff from agricultural land and similarly
polluting industries, and all runoff from industries
where hazardous substances or organic compounds
may be used, should be directed to treatment
facilities. If we calculate the capacity of treatment
facilities for runoff from light, and frequent rainfall
with an intensity period of 0.05 to 0.10 years, most
settlements in the country meet these requirements.
When determining the conditions for
discharging surface runoff from residential and
industrial areas into water bodies, it is necessary to
comply with the standards established by the
legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan for urban
wastewater discharge. Where separate sewerage
systems are used, surface water from the urban area
should be treated at local or centralized treatment
plants. Mechanical cleaning methods such as
grates, sand traps, settling tanks, and filters are
often used for this purpose. In some cases, it is
possible to treat surface, domestic, and industrial
wastewater together in a single treatment plant.
During periods of minimal urban wastewater
inflow, it is important to collect surface wastewater
in tanks and direct it to the sewer system. In a semi-
separated wastewater system, where surface water
is mixed with domestic and industrial wastewater,
the treatment process should follow the standard
methods used for municipal wastewater. The load
on the sewage treatment plant can be reduced by
the use of regulating tanks. The choice of surface
runoff diversion and treatment scheme and the
design of treatment facilities should be based on
qualitative and quantitative characteristics and
discharge conditions, taking into account the
technical and economic assessment of different
options.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
673
Volume 20, 2024
2 Hydrotechnical Support of
Kazakhstan Cities: Analysis of
Storm Drainage Systems,
Precipitation Composition, and
Seasonal Variations
2.1 Storm Drainage
Kazakhstan began building wastewater treatment
plants in the 1950s. Since then, mechanical
treatment plants have been put into operation in
major cities. Previously, wastewater was disposed
of in fields for filtration or discharged into water
bodies. Since the beginning of the 1970s, the first
sedimentation tanks have been built. To date, 62 of
Kazakhstan's 89 cities have wastewater treatment
plants.
According to a report by the Public Accounts
Committee for 2019, the average level of wear and
tear on sewer networks across the country was
52.2%. In some regions, including East Kazakhstan
Region, Karaganda Region, and Pavlodar Region,
this indicator is significantly higher than the
average level. For example, in the cities of
Kokshetau, Shalkar, Kapshagai, Semey, Ridder,
Karatau, Saran, Arkalyk, and Ekibastuz, the level
of wear and tear exceeds 90%.
The town of Taraz, in the south of the country,
has no sewage treatment facilities, and waste water
is dumped on fields to be filtered. In 2022, in
response to the issue of deteriorating sewerage
systems and treatment facilities, Kazakhstan
suggested a project aimed at constructing and
reconstructing sewerage systems in 53 cities across
the country. This project will be financed using
loan funds provided by the Asian Development
Bank (ADB) and the European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The
Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure
Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan is
responsible for its implementation.
Rainwater drainage systems are
underdeveloped or non-existent in many cities in
Kazakhstan. In particular, Almaty lacks
engineering facilities to treat surface runoff,
resulting in polluted water being discharged into
rivers, including the Bolshaya and Malaya
Almatinka, Esentai, Aschibulak, Terenkara, Aksai,
Kargalinka, Kazachka and some smaller rivers, [5],
[6].
In Astana, the stormwater drainage system
consists of 18 treatment plants and one storage
pond. The total length of the main collectors of the
stormwater, drainage, and ditch sewerage network
is 610.8 kilometers. These networks are designed to
divert surface runoff from the territory of more than
16,700 hectares. Nevertheless, these measures
prove to be insufficient. In this regard, in 2021, the
local administration decided to implement the Road
Map on the instructions of the head of state, which
provides for the construction of stormwater
drainage in the capital from 2021 to 2025.
The constructed wastewater treatment plants
were commissioned in autumn 2022 and completed
with landscape improvements in 2023. They are
designed to treat rain and snowmelt water before it
is discharged into the Esil River, replacing the
previous direct discharge. As the structure is
underground, a public garden has been created
above and the area has been landscaped.
The problems with stormwater drainage in the
special-purpose cities are indicative of the serious
problems in the single-industry cities of
Kazakhstan. For example, the city of Rudny has
only 4.6 kilometerskilometers of storm water
drainage, while the average annual volume of urban
water runoff is 3,938,434.5 cubic meters, [7].
2.2 Waste Water Composition
Let us consider the composition of pollutants and
their concentration entering water bodies from
urbanized areas.
The composition of pollutants present in the
surface runoff of residential areas includes:
natural mineral and organic impurities
resulting from absorption of gases from the
atmosphere and soil erosion, including dissolved
organic and mineral substances, as well as coarse
particulate matter such as sand particles, clay, and
humus;
anthropogenic substances originating
from various industrial enterprises, including
petroleum products, road pavement components,
heavy metal compounds, and other substances
depending on the specialization of the local
industry;
bacterial contaminants that may enter
drains when the sanitary condition of the territory
and sewerage networks is not satisfactory and when
maximum flow rates are exceeded.
The qualitative and quantitative compositions of
surface runoff are affected by:
degree of area improvement;
traffic intensity;
population density.
The composition of surface runoff, including
various elements such as suspended solids, BOD20,
and petroleum products, is a key factor in selecting
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
674
Volume 20, 2024
the optimal treatment technology, according to the
Recommendations of the Construction Regulations
of the Republic of Kazakhstan 4.01-03-2011 Water
Drainage. Outdoor networks and structures on the
surface of residential areas, [8], [9]. These
parameters vary depending on various conditions,
such as the level of landscaping, road surface
cleaning, the presence of main streets with heavy
traffic, adjacent industrial facilities, and the degree
of contamination of roofs of buildings and
structures.
The amount of surface runoff from residential
and industrial areas during rainfall, snowmelt, and
street washing in each city in Kazakhstan varies
depending on the amount of rainfall in different
seasons, surface characteristics, and the volume of
the watercourse. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show a
graph of the approximate composition of surface
runoff of rain and snowmelt water from residential
areas.
Fig. 1: Content of pollutants carried by rainwater runoff from residential areas
Fig. 2: Content of pollutants carried by snowmelt runoff from residential areas
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Residential areas
with a high level
of improvement
Modern
residential
development
Main streets with
heavy traffic
Territories
adjacent to
industrial
facilities
Roofs of
buildings and
structures
Territories with a
predominance of
individual
residential
development;
lawns and green
spaces
Rainwater runoff
Suspended solids, mg/dm3 BOD20, kg/dm3 Petroleum products, mg/dm3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Residential areas
with a high level
of improvement
Modern
residential
development
Main streets with
heavy traffic
Territories
adjacent to
industrial
facilities
Roofs of
buildings and
structures
Territories with a
predominance of
individual
residential
development;
lawns and green
spaces
Snowmelt runoff
Suspended solids, mg/dm3 BOD20, kg/dm3 Petroleum products, mg/dm3
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
675
Volume 20, 2024
The graphs show that significant excesses of
the MPC for pollutants exceeding the norms during
the formation of surface water flow are suspended
substances. The largest quantities are found on
main streets with intensive traffic and areas
adjacent to industrial facilities.
Usually, the highest values of these indicators
are characteristic of meltwater, which can be
comparable to untreated domestic wastewater in
terms of BOD20 content.
Surface runoff from urban areas can lead to
pollution and contamination of river and lake
waters that serve as a source of drinking water and
recreational areas and leads to an intensification of
the flooding process in urbanized areas.
When pre-treating rain and snowmelt water, the
effect of reducing the concentration of suspended
solids and petroleum products by delaying the flow
in the storage tank for 1-3 days can reach 80-90%,
whereas the concentration of dissolved organic
matter will be reduced by 60-80% for BOD20 and
by 8-90% for COD. Due to the high content of fine
impurities in the surface runoff with hydraulic size
less than 0.2 mm/s, the concentration of suspended
solids in the residual water may vary from 50 to
200 mg/dm3, whereas the concentration of
petroleum products varies from 2 to 10 mg/dm3
from residential areas and up to 10-50 mg/dm3 from
industrial sites. The residual content of dissolved
compounds in terms of COD and BOD20 may be
50-100 and 20-30 mg/dm3 respectively, [10].
2.3 Seasonal Variation of Precipitation
Due to climate change, the Republic of Kazakhstan
is experiencing changes in the seasonal
precipitation pattern. These changes may vary from
region to region, but in general, they have an
impact on water resources and ecosystems.
On average, precipitation in Kazakhstan is
above the norm in spring and autumn - 113.6% and
112.2%, and below the norm in winter and summer
- 92.8% and 78.4%, respectively. In winter
2021/2022 (December 2021 - February 2022), the
average winter precipitation in Kazakhstan was
92.8 % of the norm. In the most part of the country,
precipitation was more than 80 % of the norm,
which is shown in Figure 3.
The largest amount of precipitation (more than
120% of the norm) was recorded in the western
regions of the country (122-187%), in the northern
regions (124-176%), and in some southern areas
(122-134%). Particularly significant excesses of the
norm were noted at the meteorological stations of
Zhetykonur in the Ulytau region (165%) and
Karauyl in the Abay region (196%). These
indicators, as well as data from a number of
meteorological stations in the Kostanay and Atyrau
regions, allow characterizing the winter season in
these regions as "extremely wet".
At the same time, in the Mangistau region (33-
71%), southern regions (41-79%), Karaganda
region (55-79%), in the east of the country (55-
79%), and in some north areas (44-78%) there was
a deficit of precipitation, which led to extremely
dry conditions in a number of territories.
The spring season of 2022 also brought
interesting changes: on average, precipitation in
Kazakhstan was 114% of the norm. The
precipitation excess was especially felt in the
western and southern regions, with the exception of
the Kyzylorda region. In the western regions,
precipitation was twice as high as normal, reaching
204-280%. In the southern regions of Turkestan,
Zhambyl, Almaty, and Zhetysu regions, significant
excess precipitation was also recorded (122-195%),
as at the Aral Tenizi weather station in the
Kyzylorda region (179%).
In the spring of 2022, new precipitation records
were set, including 270.7 mm at the Zhalanash
weather station in the Almaty region and 151.1 mm
at the Chapayevo weather station in the West
Kazakhstan region. Nevertheless, precipitation
deficits continued to prevail in the north and east of
the country, where the amount was only 26-79% of
the norm.
Insufficient precipitation was also observed in
some areas of the Kyzylorda and Karaganda
regions, confirming the complex climate dynamics
in Kazakhstan in recent years.
The summer and autumn seasons in
Kazakhstan showed significant changes in
precipitation patterns, which are part of the overall
climate dynamics in the country.
In summer, the average precipitation across the
territory was only 78% of the norm, indicating a
dry season with a 13% probability of below-normal
precipitation. Most of Kazakhstan's territory
experienced a precipitation deficit, with some
regions experiencing precipitation below 80% of
the norm. Particularly dry zones (less than 20% of
the norm) were recorded in Mangistau (only 9% of
the norm), Aktobe (15%), Kyzylorda (15-18%),
and Turkestan (12-15%) regions. A new minimum
of only 82.7 mm of precipitation was recorded at
the Narynkol weather station. In some parts of the
country, conditions were so extreme that they could
be described as “extremely dry”. Only in certain
regions of the western (136-276% of the norm),
southern (137-274%) and northern (128-156%)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
676
Volume 20, 2024
parts of the country there was excess precipitation,
[11].
Autumn, on the contrary, brought more
moisture. The average level of precipitation across
Kazakhstan was 112% of the norm. In the northern
regions, such as Kostanay (122-190%), North
Kazakhstan (121-145%), and Akmola (126-162%)
regions, there was a significant excess of
precipitation. In the western part of the country,
including West Kazakhstan (132-188%) and
Mangistau (155-198%) regions, there was also an
excess of moisture. The southern regions did not
remain on the sidelines: in the Kyzylorda region,
the amount of precipitation reached 211% of the
norm, in Turkestan - 140-277%, in Zhambyl - 133-
167%, in Almaty - 136-191%, in Zhetysu region -
130-178% of the norm. As a result, according to
data from sixteen weather stations located in the
western, southern, and northern regions, autumn
2022 was marked as “extremely wet”, [12].
Snow cover is an important climatic factor.
Observation and study of snow cover is important
for various types of economic activities. The great
length of Kazakhstan's territory and a variety of
physical and geographical conditions determine
different humidity and snow cover conditions.
Kazgidromet Republican State Enterprise carries
out observations of snow cover at meteorological
sites and on snow measuring routes and also uses
remote sensing methods (RS).
Changes in snow cover characteristics were
analyzed using NASA FEWS NET Land Data
Assimilation System (FLDAS) data. The system
provides open access to a set of snow cover
characterization products. The products have a
daily update period, spatial resolution of 1 km, and
an archive since 2000. Among the most informative
products for the conditions of Kazakhstan are:
Daily Snow Depth, Daily Snow Depth Anomaly,
Snow Water Equivalent, and Daily Snow Water
Equivalent Anomaly. Average values of snow
cover characteristics for the region(s) are based on
calculations using data determined on a regular grid
with a step of 1 km.
The pattern of the average snow depth during
the cold period (November - April) of the season
2021/2022 and for the previous cold period
2020/2021, averaged over the territory of
Kazakhstan as a whole is presented in Figure 4.
Spatial distribution of the daily snow depth pattern
in Kazakhstan in the 2021/2022 season as of 21-31
March 2022.
Fig. 3: Geographical distribution of seasonal precipitation in Kazakhstan in 2022, in % of the norm for
the base period 1961-1990
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
677
Volume 20, 2024
Fig. 4: Average snow depth pattern
Table 1. Ten-day values of share (%) of snow coverage in the regions of Kazakhstan and its changes for the
period from 31 December 2021 to 31 March 2022. to 31 March 2022
Region
31/12
31/01
1002
20/02
28/02
10/03
20/03
31/03
Kazakhstan
83
92
92
84
75
71
81
58
West Kazakhstan
100
100
100
100
79
98
100
49
Atyrau
86
100
100
57
27
42
92
0
Mangystau
8
38
29
0
0
5
12
0
Kostanay
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Aktobe
81
100
100
96
88
90
100
78
Akmola
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
North Kazakhstan
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Pavlodar
100
100
100
100
100
96
100
89
Karaganda
100
100
100
100
100
91
100
66
East Kazakhstan
100
100
100
100
100
98
100
90
Turkestan
49
54
56
42
26
11
28
11
Kyzylorda
61
95
84
51
30
12
42
0
Almaty
77
91
98
93
70
6
61
30
Zhambyl
42
80
78
63
33
42
46
9
Note: Kazgidromet materials, [11]
Table 1 presents ten-day values of the share
(%) of snow coverage in the regions of Kazakhstan
and its changes for the period from 31 December
2021 to 31 March 2022.
During the spring and autumn seasons, the
average amount of precipitation across the country
is above normal, indicating a tendency for wetter
conditions during these periods. In contrast, the
winter and summer months are characterized by a
deficit of precipitation, especially in summer,
leading to dry conditions in some regions.
The most notable deviations from the norm are
observed both increasing and decreasing in
precipitation. In some regions, such as the western
and southern regions, precipitation is significantly
above normal, leading to extremely wet conditions
that may pose additional challenges to water
management and agriculture. On the other hand, in
some parts of the country, particularly in the south
and west, extremely dry conditions are observed,
with precipitation significantly below normal,
increasing the risk of droughts and reducing water
availability.
Changes in seasonal precipitation patterns can
entail various challenges such as water
management, dealing with droughts or excessive
precipitation, and adapting agriculture to new
conditions.
Analyses of the quality of surface wastewater
collected in large cities have revealed a high level
of pollution. The degree and nature of this pollution
depend on several factors, including the sanitary
condition and the level of improvement of the
territory where the wastewater is collected.
Precipitation, its intensity and duration, droughts
and the intensity of snowmelt have the greatest
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
678
Volume 20, 2024
impact. The amount of pollution entering surface
runoff water depends on the population, the degree
of landscaping, the frequency of street cleaning and
watering, and the condition of road surfaces. As the
number of cars on city streets increases, there is an
increase in the pollution of rain and meltwater
runoff with petroleum products.
As the history of major spring floods in
Kazakhstan and around the world shows, they can
cause major flooding, destruction of irrigation
systems, breaches of dams, levees, and other
hydraulic structures, and millions of tenges in
damage. Breakthroughs destroy houses,
households, and industrial buildings, and can even
lead to loss of life.
Over the past decade, our country has
experienced many large, destructive floods.
In 2011, 38 settlements in five districts of
the West Kazakhstan region were flooded, 2,600
residential houses, 7,146 summer houses were
damaged, and hundreds of cattle fell.
In 2012, 23 settlements in nine districts of the
South Kazakhstan region were flooded, affecting
254 houses and a thousand private farms.
In 2013, the dam of the reservoir in Kokpekty
village of Bukhar-Zhyrau district of the Karaganda
region burst due to a sharp inflow of meltwater.
In 2014, flood waters came to 13 settlements
located in five districts of Akmola region, flooding
about 430 residential houses.
In 2015, the regional center, the cities of
Temirtau, Shakhtinsk, and almost 50 settlements,
and two wintering areas in nine districts of
Karaganda region were flooded. More than 170 out
of 1,120 flooded houses were destroyed, a large
number of livestock fell.
In 2017, large floods occurred in North
Kazakhstan, East Kazakhstan, Almaty, Zhambyl,
Kostanay and Aktobe regions.
In 2018, a similar situation occurred here. In
East Kazakhstan alone, the damage totaled KZT
2,205,000,000.
In May 2020, due to heavy rains, the dam of
the Sardoba reservoir in Uzbekistan burst, bringing
a large flood to the Maktaaral district of Turkestan
region.
In 2022, 185 dwellings were flooded by
meltwater in Aktobe, West Kazakhstan, Pavlodar
and Karaganda regions.
Meanwhile, according to Kazgidromet, the area
of Kazakhstan covered with snow is 72%. By
analyzing the values of precipitation, water reserves
in snow, autumn soil moisture, soil freezing depth,
as well as the ice conditions of rivers, one could
give a preliminary assessment of flood-prone
regions. These include, first of all, ten regions:
Karaganda, Akmola, North Kazakhstan, Kostanay,
Aktobe, West Kazakhstan, East Kazakhstan, Abay,
Almaty and Zhetysu. The remaining seven are in
areas with medium and low risks.
As shown by long-term observations at weather
stations, in March and April a monthly norm of
precipitation can fall in a day, which can lead to the
occurrence of dangerous natural
hydrometeorological phenomena, Figure 5.
Fig. 5: Flooding of houses
Working with statistical data for Kazakhstan it
is possible to propose new technologies and
methods of surface water harvesting, including the
use of green spaces, ecosystem elements, and
innovative engineering solutions.
3 Ecosystem Elements and
Innovative Engineering Solutions
In the context of a changing climate, it is becoming
increasingly urgent to review and find optimal
methods of water utilization and stormwater
management. Stormwater flows, mixed with
rubbish, heavy metals, and other pollutants, pose a
serious problem requiring immediate intervention.
Green infrastructure such as green roofs, permeable
pavements, bioswales, rainwater harvesting
systems, green alleys, stormwater parks, and
reserves effectively counter stormwater pollution
and reduce flood risk while providing open spaces
for recreation and living, improving air quality,
regulating climate and contributing to an attractive
environment.
3.1 Rain Gardens
Rain gardens are an important component of a
sustainable stormwater management system,
helping to reduce the load on main sewer systems
and making landscapes aesthetically pleasing.
In various countries around the world, such as
the US, UK, Australia, and Ukraine, as well as in
northern regions including Norway, Sweden, and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
679
Volume 20, 2024
Finland, rain gardens are widespread and utilized as
an important element of sustainable urban
development. Rain gardens play a key role in such
programs as Environmental Stormwater
Management (ESM) and Low Impact Development
(LID) in the US, Sustainable Drainage Systems
(SuDS) in the UK, and Water Saving Urban Design
(WSUD) in Australia.
However, in countries with northern climates
characterized by low winter temperatures and
significant snowfall, rain gardens need to be
adapted to the local weather conditions and use
plants that are well adapted to the local
environment.
To create a rain garden in Kazakhstan, the
following shrubs and herbs can be used to "drink"
excess water, facilitating the work of urban
drainage systems, [13]:
A combination of different types of plants and
shrubs can give a rain garden diversity, beauty, and
functionality. Here are some idea combinations:
Elderberry and Lavender:
Elderberry will provide height and texture to
the garden and attract birds and insects. Lavender
adds fragrance and color to the garden and is a
source of nectar for bees and other beneficial
insects.
Verbena and Melissa:
These plants love moist conditions and attract
butterflies and other beneficial insects. Verbena,
with its bright flowers, creates a beautiful
backdrop, while melissa adds fragrance and texture
to a rain garden.
Virginia Cypress and Lily of the Valley:
Virginia cypress will give the garden structure
and a green backdrop, while the lily of the valley
with its fragrant flowers will beautify the garden
and add notes of delicacy.
Silverberry and Almond:
Silverberry, with its beautiful autumn foliage,
will create interesting contrasts in your garden
throughout the year. Almond, with its fresh
fragrance and green leaves, enhances the beauty of
the silverberry and adds an extra element of
decoration.
Willow and Daylily:
Willow, with its curved branches, will create a
cozy space in the rain garden and protect it from
the wind. The daylily, with its bright colors,
and flexible leaves, will add elegance and charm to
a rain garden.
These combinations can only serve as a starting
point. It is important to consider local conditions,
water availability, and lighting when selecting
plants and shrubs for a rain garden, [14], [15].
As well as being aesthetically pleasing, rain
gardens remove coarse pollutants by filtering
runoff through the load, providing up to 95%
removal of suspended solids. As many heavy
metals and petroleum products are associated with
suspended solids, their concentrations are also
reduced by the removal of coarse impurities.
Sorption and ion exchange processes on the
filter media particles remove dissolved substances
in the surface runoff. Biological absorption,
decomposition, and binding of pollutants by plants
and biofilm, which is formed in the filter media and
on plant roots, play an important role in treatment.
During dry periods, the ultraviolet part of the sun's
rays helps to break down trapped organic
compounds and also has a disinfectant effect. The
main mechanisms for the extraction of dissolved
impurities in rain gardens are shown in Figure 6.
Fig. 6: Main mechanisms of dissolved impurities extraction in rain gardens
Scheme of dissolved impurities extraction in rain gardens
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
680
Volume 20, 2024
The combination of the described processes
provides high efficiency in the removal of various
pollutants: petroleum products: at the level of 90%,
organic substances (by BOD): at the level of 70%,
zinc, lead, and cadmium: at the level of 90%,
copper: at the level of 80%. Total nitrogen removal
is 75%, nitrite and nitrate removal is 80% and
phosphorus removal is 90%. However, under
certain conditions, nitrogen and phosphorus can be
released from organic debris and dead plant parts,
which can increase their initial concentration in
runoff after passing through the rain garden.
To improve the efficiency of removing
dissolved pollutants from water, rain gardens can
use fillers with high sorption and ion exchange
activity, such as zeolite, vermiculite, perlite, and
activated carbon. These materials have unique
properties that help improve the quality of water
filtration and purification. Zeolite, a natural mineral
with high porosity, is able to effectively absorb and
retain various pollutants. Due to its ion exchange
properties, zeolite can replace harmful ions, such as
ammonium and heavy metals, with less dangerous
analogs. Vermiculite, a layered mineral, is able to
absorb water and hold various pollutants in its
layers. It also helps retain moisture in the rain
garden, which improves conditions for biological
processes and regulates soil moisture. Perlite, a
lightweight and porous material, helps improve
water filtration. Its structure allows for the even
distribution of water across the entire surface of the
rain garden, increasing the interaction of water with
other fillers, which increases the overall efficiency
of the treatment system. These materials
significantly reduce the concentration of harmful
substances in surface runoff, preventing
environmental pollution, [16]. In moderate climates
where cold temperatures can slow down biological
cleaning processes, these media provide reliable
filtration and contaminant absorption, maintaining
the effectiveness of the rain garden. Due to their
properties, media reduces the load on the soil and
plants, which helps prevent clogging and
degradation, ensuring long-term and stable
operation of the system.
3.2 Water Permeable Pavements
The rapid increase in the use of impermeable
building materials in transport infrastructure and
agricultural construction reduces the infiltration of
rainwater into the soil. In a natural ecosystem,
water evaporation is 73%, exceeding runoff and
leakage, but in urban environments, outflow (55%)
dominates compared to evaporation and leakage.
There is therefore a need to develop water
management systems in the construction industry.
One method of addressing this problem is the use
of water-permeable concrete pavements.
Water permeable concrete was introduced back
in the 1980s and has been successfully used in
various areas including the US, Japan, Western
Europe, and Scandinavian countries due to its many
advantages. Today, this material is widely used in
the construction of private roads, car parks,
footpaths, pavements, courtyard driveways, cycle
and pedestrian paths, golf courses, and other
facilities, Figure 7.
Currently, this construction material continues
to attract the attention of many research centers
around the world. In fact, the same base materials
are used to produce permeable concrete as for
conventional concrete, except that fine aggregate is
often eliminated completely and the dosage of
coarse aggregate (crushed stone, gravel) is carefully
adjusted to improve curing properties. The result is
a mix that requires special skills in mixing, placing,
compacting, and curing. Although the water-
repellent properties of this concrete mix are slightly
inferior to those of conventional concrete mixes,
the dosage of all components must be strictly
controlled to achieve the desired results.
Fig. 7: Footpaths
The use of permeable concrete primarily
reduces the drainage of water into the sewerage
system, thereby naturally recharging the water table
and, as a result, eliminating pollutants such as
hydrocarbons, de-icing agents, oils, fuels and
lubricants, which pollute river basins and damage
the ecosystem, as in the case of artificial rainwater
harvesting and mass discharges into watercourses
(research shows that 97-99% of oils injected into
permeable concrete are captured and naturally
biodegraded), Figure 8.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
681
Volume 20, 2024
Fig. 8: Application of permeable concretes
The tiles with the highest permeability have an
appearance similar to that of popcorn. Uniformly
distributed aggregates of the same size, used in
close proximity, produce concrete with open voids
that promote rapid drainage of large volumes of
water. Some people like the natural, rough look of
plain permeable concrete. However, there are
several ways to improve its aesthetics for those
who prefer a different style. Improvements can
include coloring, stamping, jointing, and grinding.
Water-permeable concrete is a more
economical option for pavement construction,
Figure 9. Pavements made from this material have
lower initial construction costs because there is no
need for a rainwater drainage system, reducing the
cost of installing underground pipes and gutters,
[17]. In addition, there is no need to invest in land
for the construction of retention ponds or filtration
systems. As a result, land owners can utilize the
surrounding area much more efficiently.
Fig. 9: Water permeable concretes
However, pavements made of permeable
concrete can withstand significant loads exceeding
20 MPa, i.e. they are strong enough for the possible
entry of a fire truck or heavy construction
equipment. If these loads are not intensive, there
will be no damage to the road surface. From the
driver's point of view, the texture of permeable
concrete pavements also has advantages. When
driving in difficult weather conditions such as rain
or snow, permeable concrete improves road safety.
Rain and snow melt are absorbed into the concrete
and do not remain on the surface, eliminating water
accumulation and significantly reducing the risk of
aquaplaning on wet roads, [18], [19].
4 Application of Ecosystem
Approaches in Countries:
Experience and Methodologies
The London Transport Strategy 2018 sets a target
of reducing impervious surfaces by more than 5
hectares annually. In addition, the city is actively
educating residents on the implementation of
SUDS elements: developing guidelines and
providing grants for residents and communities
wishing to utilize SUDS on their sites.
In Sydney, the domestic and storm sewer
systems operate separately. Half of the stormwater
system is managed by Sydney Water and the other
half is managed by the city's municipalities.
Landowners are responsible for managing
stormwater on their properties, [20].
As part of the Sydney 2030 strategy, an
Environmental Action 2016-2021 Strategy and
Action Plan has been developed. The document
envisages connecting various facilities and parks to
alternative sources of water supply, including
rainwater harvesting, as well as upgrading park
irrigation systems, introducing rain gardens, and
replacing impermeable pavements with green
spaces, [21].
Among the implemented projects, the Green
Square Stormwater Drain Project is noteworthy.
This project created a 2.5-kilometer-long surface
runoff drainage system equipped with 1,800 mm
diameter pipes and used green infrastructure to
clean the runoff from debris. After treatment, the
water is collected in tanks under the Matron Ruby
Grant Park and then piped to the residences for use
in flushing toilets and watering plants.
Sydney has also introduced a system of rates
for surface water drainage services depending on
the type of property. There is a flat fee for
residential property owners, which varies by
property type. For example, owners of single-
family homes pay a rate of AUD 20.78 per quarter
and flat owners pay a rate of AUD 6.64. Table 2
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
682
Volume 20, 2024
shows the stormwater disposal rates for residential
properties in Sydney, Australia, for 2021-2023,
[22].
Table 2. Stormwater rates for residential properties
in Sydney, Australia, for 2021-2023.
Type of property
Rate in
2021-2022,
AUD per 4
months
Rate in 2022-
2023, AUD per
4 months
Residential property
(single-family
house)
19.76
20.78
Residential property
with a discount
(single-family
house)
6.32
6.34
Residential property
(flat/apartment)
6.32
6.64
Source: [23]
The billing system provides discounts for
reduced runoff volumes. If residents of single-
family dwellings reduce their runoff volume, they
receive the same flat rate as residents of multi-
family dwellings. Various methods can be used to
achieve this goal, such as:
Installing large rainwater tanks that collect
water from the roof and divert it for domestic use.
The use of infiltration systems such as rain
gardens that trap stormwater and prevent it from
entering the storm drainage system.
Use of permeable surfaces for pavements and
pathways.
The "sponge city" concept has been
successfully implemented in Wuhan and Beijing.
This concept includes a surface runoff drainage
system, associated green areas, and water bodies. In
2020, the system effectively coped with the
increase in rainfall, reducing the number of flooded
points from 162 to 30 compared to previous years,
such as in 2016. Researchers at the University of
Leeds estimated that the implementation of the
sponge city concept in Wuhan saved around €510
million.
Improving and restoring the natural
environment in cities contributes to CO2
sequestration and improved adaptation to climate
change. Urban natural solutions such as green roofs
and water wetlands contribute to cooling cities,
improving water quality and flood protection.
In the US, Seattle is implementing an
Integrated Plan program to address combined sewer
overflows and surface runoff pollution. The Capitol
Hill Water Quality project is an example of a
successful implementation of this program,
incorporating biofiltration facilities to treat
stormwater flowing into Lake Union. The project
takes into account the topography of the city: water
passes through a diversion basin, is treated in
drainage ditches, and passes through grassy areas to
filter out impurities.
5 Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of
an Integrated Approach to Surface
Water Management through
Ecosystem Solutions
According to the Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment (MA) programme announced back in
2000 by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan,
ecosystem services can be categorized into 4 types,
[24]:
provisioning services;
regulating services;
cultural services;
supporting services.
Supporting ecosystem services stand out from
other types of ecosystem services - provisioning,
regulating, and cultural - because their impacts on
people are indirect and can persist over long
periods of time. For example, the process of soil
formation can take many decades or even centuries.
The other types of ecosystem services depend on
supporting services because they are usually
interconnected and have different physical,
chemical, and biological underpinnings, [25].
Supporting services relate to certain
biophysical structures or processes of ecosystems
such as soil, trees, and other plants that play a key
role in maintaining water balance. These services
are also the basis for the provision of other services
directly important to people, such as improving
water quality, cleaning the air, securing wood
supplies, and providing food from wildlife. The
benefits of such ecosystem services can be seen, for
example, in reduced flood risk, [25].
Let us consider the relationship between
ecosystems, services, and benefits in Figure 10.
Organizations, cities, and infrastructure
projects can also benefit from ecosystem services
through the use of resources such as water or
protection from natural disasters such as flooding.
In certain cases, this may provide an opportunity to
utilize more efficient alternative methods instead of
more costly technical solutions, [26].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
683
Volume 20, 2024
Fig.10: Relationship between ecosystems, services, and benefits
The ideas of natural solutions and the
ecosystem approach are becoming increasingly
common in national planning and regulatory
documents, reflecting the general trend towards a
green economy. This interest on the part of
governments is driven by the recognition of the
importance of conserving and sustainably
managing natural resources in the context of
combating climate change, as well as the
recognition that national economies are highly
dependent on natural resources. Estimates by the
International Expert Council on Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Services (IPCC) indicate that more than
half of the world's GDP relies heavily on ecosystem
services, in both developed and developing
countries. Examples of support for natural solutions
include initiatives in the Netherlands, such as the
allocation of funds from the city budget for rain
garden projects in Rotterdam in 2016, and the
issuance of USD 5 billion green bonds by the
Ministry of Finance in 2019 to finance riverine
natural solutions projects.
A comparative study of two options for
deploying infrastructure to manage stormwater
runoff: the traditional (grey) scenario and the
ecological (green) scenario based on the use of
ecosystem services. The traditional scenario
involves the installation of engineering systems to
drain rainwater and the construction of treatment
plants, after which the treated water is discharged
into the river. The ecological scenario of "city in a
garden" includes rainwater runoff management
using nature-like technologies and green
infrastructure such as bio-drainage ditches,
rainwater harvesting in tanks for domestic needs,
and the creation of an artificial reservoir in the city,
[27].
The economic comparison of stormwater
management options is presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Economic comparison of stormwater
management options
Technical
Solution
Traditional
approach
City in the
Garden
project
differenc
e, %
Pond
construction
119,700,00
0
Rain
gardens
247,740,00
0
Bio-
drainage
ditches
325,000,00
0
Constructio
n of local
sewage
treatment
plants
1,250,000,00
0
Constructio
n of storm
drainage
390,000,000
0
Total
capital
expenditure
s, KZT
1,640,000,00
0
692,443,00
0
-57%
Repair and
maintenanc
e costs,
KZT, per
year
54,666,665
34,622,150
-36.7%
The analysis of the data from Table 3 allows us
to draw the following conclusions:
The application of green infrastructure to
manage rainwater runoff in low-density cities
significantly reduces both capital and operating
costs compared to the traditional approach (by a
factor of 1.6-2.4), [28].
In the garden city scenario, greenhouse gas
emissions were 1.5% lower than in the traditional
scenario. With an increase in the carbon price,
which is typical for the world practice and can be
implemented in Russia as well, the difference in
costs can be significant. In addition, cooling costs
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
684
Volume 20, 2024
in the garden city project were 27% lower
compared to the traditional project.
The expansion of green spaces optimizes the
load on urban infrastructure and improves the
quality of life for city dwellers, with the type of
plants planted playing an important role. Trees help
improve air quality and are more effective in
reducing the island's heat island effect than grasses
and shrubs.
However, not all of the benefits of using
ecosystem services have been taken into account.
For example, reduced maintenance and
construction of sewers lead to reduced flood risk
and associated costs, but this was not considered in
this study.
Effective implementation of green
infrastructure requires significant amounts of
undeveloped land. Green infrastructure, including
parks, forest plantations, and water bodies, plays an
important role in improving the ecological
situation, reducing air pollution, and improving
water quality. In the context of urbanization, when
natural areas are limited, the use of undeveloped
land becomes key to creating large ecological
zones. These areas allow the integration of natural
elements into the urban environment, ensuring the
coherence and effectiveness of green infrastructure.
Careful design and long-term planning based on
sustainable development principles are necessary to
preserve biodiversity and adapt to changing
conditions. Green infrastructure also improves
quality of life, promotes tourism, and creates
comfortable conditions for residents. With a
shortage of undeveloped land in existing cities,
using undeveloped land helps avoid the demolition
of buildings and reduces the cost of implementing
projects, making them more cost-effective and
sustainable in the long term.
It is important to note that utilizing green
infrastructure requires careful design and the
availability of significant amounts of undeveloped
land. For example, the "city in a garden" project
requires the allocation of over 300 hectares of
additional land, the market price of which in Kazan
is approximately RUB 7.6 billion, [29].
Thus, the "garden city" project demonstrates
good economic performance (not taking into
account the cost of land). However, the high price
of land in large cities creates difficulties in
justifying such projects in terms of economic
feasibility. The inclusion of the "willingness to
pay" methodology in economic evaluations of
"green" projects in Kazakhstan is not always
adequate, as the majority of the population shows
a low willingness to pay for such services.
Nevertheless, the global experience of research
on the impact of environmental factors on property
prices shows that the creation of green areas can
significantly increase the value of land and property
in these areas. This is confirmed by various
valuation methods, such as geodynamic pricing for
the cities mentioned above. In this way, developers
are compensated for alienating additional land for
green infrastructure through higher property prices
and the willingness of future residents to pay for
this increase.
6 Conclusion
In the context of urbanization and high land costs,
the implementation of green infrastructure faces
serious economic barriers. Although the initial
costs may be high, ignoring the long-term benefits
such as improved air quality, lower temperatures,
and higher living standards may be a strategic
mistake. Integrating green infrastructure
management into urban planning and revising
urban development regulations can contribute to
more sustainable urban development. These
findings are relevant not only for Kazakhstan but
also for other countries where urbanization is
creating similar problems. Countries with highly
developed economies and rapidly growing cities,
such as the US, EU countries, and China, also face
difficulties in implementing green infrastructure
due to economic and planning barriers. Current
research confirms that investments in such projects
can significantly improve urban ecology and reduce
the load on utility systems, which emphasizes the
importance of considering the long-term benefits of
using green technologies. Future research should
focus on assessing the cost-effectiveness of new
technologies, developing models to predict the
performance of wastewater treatment plants,
creating rainwater collection and treatment
systems, and exploring the potential for recycling
treated water for technical purposes. This research
direction will help to better understand the potential
benefits and challenges of integrating green
infrastructure into urban management and planning.
This study provides a comprehensive overview of
the challenges and solutions associated with the
implementation of green infrastructure in
Kazakhstan and other urbanized regions, focusing
on specific issues such as deterioration of sewer
systems and insufficient development of storm
sewers. It offers specific recommendations for
improving urban ecology and infrastructure,
contributing to the development of more
sustainable solutions and creating a basis for further
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
685
Volume 20, 2024
research and practical actions in the field of
sustainable urban environment development.
Acknowledgments:
The article was prepared under the grant financing
of scientific projects of the Ministry of Science and
Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan
(AP19679641 "Integrated Urban Precipitation
Management: Model and Implementation
Mechanisms").
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted
Technologies in the Writing Process
In preparing this work, the authors utilized
ChatGPT to:
-refine wording and improve clarity of
presentation;
-review and enhance the logical structure of the
content.
After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed
and edited the content as needed and take full
responsibility for the content of the publication.
References:
[1] The complete guide to stormwater
management, 2018, [Online].
https://www.xylem.com/siteassets/campaigns
/stormwater-handbook-us_interactive.pdf
(Accessed Date: March 4, 2024).
[2] Younghan Edwin Jung, M. Myung Jeong,
Hwandon Jun, Trevor Smith. Contemplation
of Improvement Efforts to Manage
Combined Sewer Overflows. Infrastructures
2023, 8(10), 150.
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures810015
0.
[3] Emanuele Quaranta, Stephan Fuchs, Hendrik
Jan Liefting, Alma Schellart, Alberto
Pistocchi. Costs and beneits of combined
sewer overflow management strategies at the
European scale. Vol. 318, 15 September
2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.1156
29.
[4] Lund N.S.V., et al., Integrated stormwater
inflow control for sewers and green
structures in urban landscapes. Nature
Sustainability, 2019. 2(11): p. 1003–1010,
[Online].
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-
0392-1 (Accessed Date: March 17, 2024).
[5] Hasan Volkan Orala, Pedro Carvalho b,
Magdalena Gajewskac, Nadia Ursinod,
Fabio Masi e, Eric D. van Hullebusch f , Jan
K. Kazakg, Alfonso Expositoh, Giulia
Cipollettai , Theis Raaschou Andersen j ,
David Christian Fingerk, Lena Simperler l ,
Martin Regelsberger m, Vit Rousn, Matej
Radinjao, Gianluigi Buttiglieri p,q, Pawel
Krzeminski r . A review of nature-based
solutions for urban water management in
European circular cities: a critical
assessment based on case studies and
literature. Blue-Green Systems, Vol. 2, No.
1, 2020, doi: 10.2166/bgs.2020.932.
[6] Botturi, A., Ozbayram, E.G., Tondera, K.,
Gilbert, N.I., Rouault, P., Caradot, N.,
Gutierrez, O., Daneshgar, S., Frison, N.,
Akyol, Ç., Foglia, A., Eusebi, A.L., Fatone,
F. Combined sewer overflows: A critical
review on best practice and innovative
solutions to mitigate impacts on environment
and human health(Article), Vol. 51, Issue 15,
2021, pp. 1585-1618, [Online].
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?e
id=2-s2.0-
85084492922&origin=inward&txGid=67b26
028a95887a178deb4b05aea53a3 (Accessed
Date: February 2, 2024).
[7] Shtykova I.V., and Kuzmina N.A., Analysis
of protection of the northern Kazakhstan
cities from surface runoff waters, E3S Web of
Conferences 395, 2023, 02006,
ETSAIC2023.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20233950200
6
[8] Alessandra Zanoletti, Elza Bontempi.
Editorial: Urban runoff of pollutants and their
treatment, Front. Environ. Chem., 07
February 2023, Sec. Chemical Treatments,
Vol. 4, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvc.2023.1151859.
[9] Wei, Z., Simin, L., and Fengbing, T. (2013).
Characterization of urban runoff pollution
between dissolved and particulate phases.
Sci. World J. 2013, pp.1–6. doi:
10.1155/2013/964737.
[10] Hong, N., Liu, A., Zhu, P., Zhao, X., Guan,
Y., Yang, M., Wang, H. Modelling benzene
series pollutants (BTEX) build-up loads on
urban roads and their human health risks:
Implications for stormwater reuse safety,
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,
164, 2018, pp. 234-242. Quoted 17 times.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.031.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
686
Volume 20, 2024
[11] RSE "KAZHYDROMET" Review of climate
features in Kazakhstan, Astana 2023,
[Online].
https://www.kazhydromet.kz/uploads/calenda
r/153/year_file/64507ef1d4a3cobzor-ob-
osoben-klimata_kazahstan-za-
2022.pdf?ysclid=m1gez0iqpc607369674
(Accessed Date: March 29, 2024).
[12] Oladejo, T.O., Balogun, F.O., Haruna, U.A.
et al. Climate change in Kazakhstan:
implications to population health. Bull Natl
Res. Cent. 47, 144 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01122-w.
[13] Laukli, K., Vinje, H., Haraldsen, T.K., Vike,
E. Plant selection for roadside rain gardens
in cold climates using real-scale studies of
thirty-one herbaceous perennials, Urban
Forestry and Urban Greening, Vol. 78,
2022, 127759. Quoted 1 DOI:
10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127759.
[14] Jennifer Morash,Amy Wright,Charlene
LeBleu,Amanda Meder,Raymond
Kessler,Eve Brantley and Julie Howe
(2019). Increasing Sustainability of
Residential Areas Using Rain Gardens to
Improve Pollutant Capture, Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Resilience.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123269.
[15] Gaineddinova, Sarah G. Bruner, Matthew I.
Palmer, Kevin L. Griffin, Shahid Naeem.
Planting design influences green
infrastructure performance: Plant species
identity and complementarity in rain gardens.
First published: 22, June 2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2902.
[16] Fu, X., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Wang, D., Shao,
W., Mei, C., Wang, J., Sang, Y.-F.
Quantifying and assessing the infiltration
potential of green infrastructure in urban
areas using a layered hydrological model,
Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 618, 2023,
128626. DOI:
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128626.
[17] Yashkov, Making the Case for Sustainable
Urban Drainage Systems as a Nature-Based
Solution to Urban Flooding,fest Online:02
September 2017,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-
5_8.
[18] Republican State Enterprise "Kazhydromet"
Review of the Specifics of the Climate in
Kazakhstan, Astana, 2024, [Online].
https://www.kazhydromet.kz/uploads/calenda
r/192/year_file/6646ff553af2710-05-
2024_obzor-osobennostey-
klimata_kazahstan-za-2023.pdf (Accessed
Date: March 4, 2024).
[19] Zölch, T., Henze, L., Keilholz, P., Pauleit, S.
Regulating urban surface runoff through
nature-based solutions – An assessment at the
micro-scale, Environmental Research, Vol.
157, 2017, pp. 135-144. Quoted 126 times.
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023.
[20] Lu, G.; Wang, L. An Integrated Framework
of Green Stormwater Infrastructure Planning
- A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13942.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413942.
[21] Md Sazan Rahman, Sarah MacPherson and
Mark Lefsrud. Prospects of porous concrete
as a plant-growing medium and structural
component for green roofs: a review.
Published online by Cambridge University
Press. Renewable Agriculture and Food
Systems, Vol. 37, Issue 5, October 2022, pp.
536-549
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170522000138.
[22] Green, O.O., Garmestani, A.S., Albro, S. et
al. Adaptive governance to promote
ecosystem services in urban green spaces.
Urban Ecosyst 19, pp.77–93 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0476-2.
[23] Taylor Coyne. Reimagining urban design of
stormwater infrastructure in settler-colonial
Sydney. Geographical Research, First
published: 22 April 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12645.
[24] Ersoy Mirici, M. The Ecosystem Services
and Green Infrastructure: A Systematic
Review and the Gap of Economic Valuation.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 517.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010517.
[25] Lucy Oates, Liping Dai, Andrew Sudmant
and Andy Gouldson Building climate
resilience and Water security in cities:
lessons from the sponge city of Wuhan,
China, [Online].
https://urbantransitions.global/wp-
content/uploads/2020/03/Building-climate-
resilience-and-water-security-in-cities-
lessons-from-the-Sponge-City-of-Wuhan-
China-final.pdf (Accessed Date: January 14,
2024).
[26] Xiong, Z., Wang, Y. Cross-Scaling
Approach for Water-Flow-Regulating
Ecosystem Services: A Trial in Bochum,
Germany (2022) Land, 11 (5), article
740, https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050740.
[27] Chao Guo, Jiake Li, Huaien Li, Bei
Zhang,Menghua Ma and Fan Li. Seven-Year
Running Effect Evaluation and Fate Analysis
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
687
Volume 20, 2024
of Rain Gardens in Xi’an, Northwest China.
Water 2018, 10(7), 944;
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070944.
[28] Banking on Green: A Look at How Green
Infrastructure Can Save Municipalities
Money and Provide Economic Benefits
Community-wide. April 2012. A Joint Report
by American Rivers, the Water Environment
Federation, the American Society of
Landscape Architects and ECONorthwest,
[Online].
https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/Go
vernment_Affairs/Federal_Government_Affa
irs/Banking%20on%20Green%20HighRes.pd
f (Accessed Date: March 15, 2024).
[29] Morash, J.; Wright, A.; LeBleu, C.; Meder,
A.; Kessler, R.; Brantley, E.; Howe, J.
Increasing Sustainability of Residential
Areas Using Rain Gardens to Improve
Pollutant Capture, Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Resilience. Sustainability 2019,
11, 3269.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123269.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
The article was prepared under the grant financing
of scientific projects of the Ministry of Science and
Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan
(AP19679641 "Integrated Urban Precipitation
Management: Model and Implementation
Mechanisms").
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.e
n_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.65
Lydia Bekenova, Aksana Panzabekova,
Irina Shtykova, Natalia Kuzmina
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
688
Volume 20, 2024