Considering Responsibilities: The Indonesian Government at the
Intersect of Environmental Damage and Sustainable Development
Goals
YOHANES SUHARDIN1,*, RUDY HAPOSAN SIAHAAN2, ROLIB SITORUS3,
YUDHI PRIYO AMBORO4
1Faculty of Law,
Catholic University of Santo Thomas,
Jalan Setia Budi Nomor 479-F Tanjungsari Medan,
INDONESIA
2Faculty of Law,
University of North Sumatra,
Jalan Dr.T.Mansur No.9, Kampus Padang Bulan Medan,
INDONESIA
3Faculty of Law,
Pelita Harapan University Medan,
Jl. Imam Bonjol No. 6,  Medan,
INDONESIA
4Faculty of Law,
Batam Internasional University,
l. Gajah Mada, Baloi Sei Ladi Batam,
INDONESIA
*Corresponding Author
Abstract: - The purpose of this study is to investigate a pressing policy concern for the Indonesian government:
environmental degradation. The study will focus on the law and its more advanced principles within the context
of contemporary legal theory. Research methodology is known as yuridis normatif, which entails a focused
examination of relevant documents to determine the relevant principles, standards, and guidelines, as well as
theoretical frameworks and administrative regulations. The findings of this study suggest that governments
should integrate environmental principles into environmental programs to avert ecological crises, update
development policies to place equal emphasis on economic, social, cultural, and environmental factors, and
reconstruct environmental law as a solution to environmental problems. The hope is that the research will
contribute to a more thorough understanding of environmental law in the context of contemporary
jurisprudence and shed light on pressing issues of government transparency and accountability in Indonesia. It
is hoped that this research will provide a solid foundation for improving Indonesia's legal framework and legal
practice to be more comprehensive and environmentally conscious.
Key-Words: - Environmental degradation, Gol policy, environmental law, ecological crisis solution, sustainable
development policy, government transparency, legal framework improvement.
Received: August 25, 2023. Revised: June 2, 2024. Accepted: July 11, 2024. Published: September 2, 2024.
1 Introduction
At the 1972 United Nations Conference on the
Human Environment (UNCHE) in Stockholm, the
Declaration on the Human Environment was the
main topic of discussion. There are 27 future
principles outlined in the Rio Declaration on
Sustainable Development; this text incorporates 26
of those ideas, [1].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
424
Volume 20, 2024
The Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable
Development, adopted by the global community
during the World Summit on Sustainable
Development, affirms their commitment to
sustainable development policies that protect the
environment and its resources, [2]. In the years
following the Stockholm Declaration of 1972, there
was an initial global dialogue about environmental
protection, economic growth, and sustainable
development. The Environmental Protection
Agency of the United Nations This led to the
creation of both the program and Earth Day.
Presidential decrees, political consensus, and the
establishment of the State Ministry of Development
and Environmental Supervision are just a few of the
numerous ways the convention has impacted
national policy.
For the first time in the second decade (1982–
1992), the United Nations Conference on the
Human Environment gathered in Nairobi, Kenya, to
celebrate its tenth anniversary. During this decade,
Indonesia ratified several international treaties, such
as the Conservation of World Cultural and National
Heritage Convention (No. 26) in 1989, the Law on
the Law of the Sea (No. 17) in 1985, and the Law on
Environmental Protection (No. 4) in 1982. [3], this
presidential decree has now made the 1965 ASEAN
Agreement on the Preservation of Natural Resources
and Environment, inked in Bangkok, a law, [4], we
established the Environmental Impact Control
Agency (Bapedal), the Environmental Studies
Center (PSL), and nine programs: the Kalpataru
program, the EIA program, the Clean River program
(Prokasih), and the Adipura program, [5].
Furthermore, the Rio de Janeiro declaration,
which included 26 principles, was established at the
Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992,
marking the beginning of the third decade (1992–
2002). Current birthrates, sustainable development
concepts (such as the "forestry principle," "Agenda
21," and "the framework convention on climate
change"), [6], Changes to Law 4 of 1982 and Law
23 of 1997; Law 5 of 1990 on Climate Change; Law
No. 5 of 1994 on Ratification of the Convention on
Biological Diversity; Law No. 6 of 1994 on
Ratification of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change; Law No. 41 of
1999 on Forestry; and Presidential Decree No. 48 of
1991 on Forestry are all examples of regulatory
developments, implementations, and
accomplishments in Indonesia during this decade,
[7], Eighth, Presidential Decree No. 4 of 1995
ratifying the International Tropical Timber
Agreement; Ninth, Proclamation No. 19/1999 on
Pollution Control and/or Marine Destruction; Tenth,
Proclamation No. 41/1999 on Air Pollution Control;
Eleventh, Proclamation No. 7/1999 on the
preservation of plant and animal species; Twelfth,
Proclamation No. 8/1999 on the utilization of wild
flora and fauna; Thirteenth, the incorporation of [8].
The Johannesburg Declaration, issued after the
World Summit in 2002, lays out plans for protecting
the environment from the negative effects of human
activity on a global, national, and regional scale to
foster sustainable development, [9]. There have
been several major environmental laws passed in
Indonesia during this decade, including: (1) Law
No. 21 of 2004 ratifying the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety; (2) Law No. 47 of 2005 ratifying the
Basel Convention on Transboundary Movement of
Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal; (3) Law No.
18 of 2008 on Waste Management; and (4) Law No.
19 of 2009 ratifying the Stockholm Convention on
Persistent Organic Pollutants, [10]; (5) Saka
Kalpataru was created; (6) Law No. 23 of 1997 was
amended to become Law No. 32 of 2009 on
Environmental Protection and Management, and (7)
Environmental Judges were appointed, [11].
President Joko Widodo oversaw progress in
forestry and environmental protection throughout
the country in the fifth decade (2012-2022).
Challenges on a worldwide scale, such as the Paris
Agreement, shaped this era, [12] and plans to
address global warming. Clear instructions, specific
instruments, regulations on peat and mangroves,
community involvement, and environmental
restoration investments are essential for
environmental development. During this time frame,
the Paris Agreement and the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change were
formally adopted, [13]. As a result of this
ratification, the ratification of the Minamata
Convention (Law No. 11 of 2017) and the Job
Creation Act of 2020 (Law No. 11 of 2020) were
enacted. (1) Law No. 11 of 2017 about the
ratification of the Minamata Convention; and (2) the
Job Creation Act of 2020 (Law No. 11 of 2020),
which prioritizes environmental and forestry
sustainability concerns alongside business
friendliness and job growth, [14].
The Indonesian government has implemented
several regulations in an attempt to curb
environmental destruction, but the rate at which the
problem is worsening is inversely proportionate to
the number of cases of environmental devastation
that have occurred in recent years:
a. Indonesia's deforestation rate hit 1.8 million
hectares per year, resulting in a loss of 21%
of the country's total forest area of 133
million hectares. A decline in environmental
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
425
Volume 20, 2024
quality, an increase in the frequency of
natural disasters, and a threat to the survival
of flora and animals are all consequences of
deforestation, [15].
b. Damage to Indonesia's coral reefs has
reached 30%, or 750 thousand acres, [16].
Coral reef destruction heightens coastal
communities' vulnerability to natural
disasters, imperils marine life, [17] and
slows down the marine fishery industry,
[18].
c. Extremely polluted air, [19], Indonesia has
problems with water pollution, soil
pollution, and marine pollution, [20]. The
Citarum River was identified as the world's
most contaminated waterway in 2010, [21],
online publication Huffington Post. After
Beijing, New Delhi, and Mexico City, the
World Bank identified Jakarta as the city
with the third-highest pollution levels.
d. There are hundreds of species of endangered
plants and animals native to Indonesia.
According to the IUCN Red List, 76 animal
species and 127 plant species in Indonesia
are in the most vulnerable category,
Critically Endangered. Another 205 animal
species and 88 plant species are listed as
endangered. Finally, 557 animal species and
256 plant species are listed as vulnerable,
[22].
Continuing environmental concerns in
Indonesia are attributed to illegal gold mining and
government control. Indigenous efforts to safeguard
woods and rivers were thwarted by officials accused
of guarding against unlawful mining techniques, and
neither the 1945 Constitution nor local rules made a
serious effort to address environmental harm.
Stone's "Should the trees stand?" sparked a
revolution in legal theory, and the author uses that to
justify his need for increased environmental
protection, [23]. This article examines the human
rights provisions in the Constitution and the
recognition of environmental rights. The idea of
ecocracy influences environmental legal disputes
worldwide, as seen in cases such as Sierra Club vs.
Morton and Wheeler vs. Government of Roja
province. This can be seen most clearly in
Indonesia's philosophical and theoretical circles,
[24]. The instances demonstrate the importance of
the doctrine in environmental ethics and ecocratic
constructionism by exposing the idea of nature as
the holder of legal rights. All of nature will gain
from this strategy since it will institutionalize
environmental rights and refresh their legal standing
in disputes, [25].
While government laws in Indonesia may be
wishful thinking, environmental civil responsibility
to the government attempts to address rising
environmental issues. For the sake of future
generations and the health of the planet,
acidification must be both complex and structured.
The researcher began by introducing two
studies that offered different viewpoints on
environmental sustainability and economic
development. The first study was conducted by [26],
focused on the role of environmentally friendly
finance in achieving the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) in Indonesia through village funds.
The second study, [27], offered a legal framework
for environmental management in Indonesia.
The first research looks at how green finance
can help promote economic and environmental
sustainability through green technology and
innovative micro-enterprises; the second study looks
at how environmental law and policy in Indonesia
affect the conflict between economic interests and
environmental preservation. The planned research,
titled "Considering Responsibility: the GoI at the
Intersection of environmental damage and the
Sustainable Development Goals," aims to
investigate how legislation functions in addressing
the complexities of environmental damage.
To find a solution to environmental problems,
this study will use a normative juridical approach to
examine legal documents and modern legal theory.
Its goals are to (1) highlight the importance of
incorporating environmental principles into
government programs, (2) promote development
policies that are balanced and consider various
social factors, and (3) suggest rebuilding
environmental law. In the long run, this research
hopes to help strengthen Indonesia's legal
framework and environmental management
practices by shedding light on important parts of
government transparency and accountability and
expanding our knowledge of environmental law in
contemporary jurisprudence.
2 Problem Formulation
The formulation of the research problem are: (1)
What role does the civil liability of the Indonesian
government play in environmental destruction? and
(2) When applying the principles of the
contemporary legal framework, how do we apply
the theory of sustainable law?
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
426
Volume 20, 2024
3 Method
This article compiles the findings of a study titled
"Environmental Civil Liability to the Government
Related to Environmental Destruction in Indonesia".
As this study takes a quantitative problem-solving
approach to existing legal issues, it employs a
juridical normative IE research methodology based
on document studies that center on a critical
examination of guiding principles, norms, concepts,
theories, and enactment. [28], specifically in the
context of environmental law, in terms of resolving
existing issues and identifying new ones,
With an emphasis on a comprehensive analysis
of legal principles, norms, ideas, and theories as
they pertain to environmental law, the study titled
"Environmental Civil Liability to the Government
Related to Environmental Destruction in Indonesia"
offers valuable insights gleaned from normative
juridical research methodology. Using this
methodology, we can examine the current
legislative framework and how well it handles
environmental issues, while also finding out what
other obstacles are out there.
This report is useful because it provides a critical
assessment of the legal frameworks in place to hold
governments accountable for environmental harm.
This research adds to the existing literature on
environmental law and governance while also
offering concrete suggestions for how lawmakers
and lawyers might strengthen environmental
protection measures. The analytical approach,
detailed in the expanded techniques section, further
supported the results. This provides a better
foundation for future studies and changes to
environmental civil liability laws.
4 Problem Solution
4.1 Environmental Destruction in
Indonesia and Civil Liability
Claims against the Government
Management and policy of the environment are
entirely within the purview of the state, as stated in
Article 33, Paragraph 3, of the Constitution of 1945.
To maximize the utilization of Indonesia's land,
water, and other natural resources for the benefit of
the people, the government imposes regulations on
them.
The Indonesian government is in charge of
environmental management and must ensure that it
is both effective and sustainable. The government
must investigate the material origins, manufacturing
methods, and viability of potential mitigation
techniques. The presidency is in charge of a
government with a sophisticated structure that
allows for thorough monitoring. The Minister of the
Environment, like all other government
subordinates, is required to report on the results of
their work.
However, society, the environment, or other
parties may complain if the government is careless
in carrying out its responsibilities. The Table 1
(Appendix) illustrates some of the conditions and
features that can arise in civil disputes.
Tort cases seek compensation for harm done to
individuals, while class action lawsuits represent the
interests of larger groups. Judicial review challenges
the validity of statutes, whereas non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) protect citizens' rights.
Individuals or non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) sue state authorities for failing to meet
certain legal responsibilities, while citizen lawsuits
seek to correct policies that harm the public interest.
Legal actions of every stripe aim to correct
injustices and protect vulnerable populations.
Damages that an individual or business must
pay as a result of a civil wrong are known as
"damages". Responsibility is the source of civil
culpability, yet it lacks a precise definition of illegal
behavior. Articles 1365 and 1366 spell out the
compensation for injuries sustained as a result of
someone else's negligence.
Awareness of the available methods to address a
wide variety of legal problems and complaints
requires a critical awareness of the distinctions
between various legal proceedings, such as standard
civil lawsuits, class action lawsuits, standing cases,
judicial review, and citizen lawsuits. Persons in
typical civil litigation pursue monetary damages for
actual, physical harm caused by someone else's
illegal actions. On the other hand, a class action
lawsuit seeks to streamline legal processes, quickly
address broad problems, and symbolize a collective
rejection of individualism by combining similar
individual claims into a single case.
Judicial review covers both direct and indirect
interests, challenging the validity of laws and
protecting citizens' constitutional rights. Initiated by
NGOs, legal standing claims do not necessitate
direct vested interests; rather, they seek to safeguard
the public's rights and interests, reflecting NGOs'
role as guardians of society. Citizen lawsuits
emphasize the execution of legal responsibilities by
state organizations rather than direct and
quantifiable interests, enabling individuals or NGOs
to hold state administrators accountable for
decisions perceived as harmful to the public interest.
From individual grievances to more systemic
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
427
Volume 20, 2024
concerns of public and constitutional interest, these
legal processes highlight a multipronged strategy for
attaining justice.
If the following conditions are met, the act may
be deemed illegal:
a. Illegal Thing Happened.
b. There Was an Issue.
c. It Has Its Drawbacks.
d. The experience of a loss can motivate one
to take corrective measures 4.
The three main types of lawsuits in civil law are
contract, tort, and statutory. The harmed party may
file a lawsuit if there is no contractual tie to
safeguard them. The subject of law takes rights and
obligations, representing himself through legal
activities, to assert the responsibility of the
government. There are two categories of people:
a. Human.
b. Legal Entity.
People can face legal consequences for their
illegal actions or inactions, [29]. Public associations
such as provinces, counties, and municipalities are
recognized as legal entities under Article 1653 of
the Civil Code. These organizations are judicial
subjects, meaning they can be sued for their actions,
[30].
Due to its official representatives and their
ability to carry out legal acts, the government enjoys
the status of a legal body, [31]. Its roots are deep in
the past, and as a result, it is now recognized as a
public, legally recognized body. The government is
a legal body since it can enforce civil law and must
abide by all applicable regulations. By the acts of
jure gestionis, it also engages in commercial
activities, [32].
Environmental firms can be sued for damages
by the public or legal entities, and it is the
government's responsibility to ensure that these
companies are held accountable. Anyone who
causes harm to another person is obligated to
recompense for that harm, according to Article 1365
of the Civil Code, [33]. Money, damages in kind,
prohibition, cancellation, or notice of remedies are
among the several forms of prosecution available
under Article 1365 of the Criminal Code, [31]. A
decent and healthy environment, as well as access to
medical care, are guaranteed under the Indonesian
constitution. Human rights and environmental
protection are inseparable, as stated in Article 1 of
Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection
and Management. Everyone has the right to a decent
and healthy living environment, as stated in Article
9 paragraph (3) of Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human
Rights, and Article 3 letter b of the same document
ensures safety, health, and human life, [34].
Environmental Protection and Management
Law No. 32 of 2009, Article 88, lays out strict
accountability for contamination or damage to the
environment. Absent evidence of wrongdoing, the
person or people whose actions cause B3 waste and
constitute a serious danger to the environment
should be held fully responsible for the damages
that have occurred. No evidence of misconduct is
necessary to support damage awards under the
notion of strict responsibility. This provision is a
specialty of tort law, [35].
One can seek compensation for damages to the
environment due to pollution or destruction by
applying civil responsibility, a concept from the
field of civil law. Absolute or stringent liability does
not require guilt but is the opposite of fault-based
liability, which requires proof of wrongdoing. Proof
of guilt is necessary for illegal activities, and
restitution is available right away. The speed at
which science and technology are progressing
complicates risk assessment in manufacturing. The
need to prove negligence or culpability creates
difficulties for authorities trying to enforce
environmental laws. Careful polluters can avoid
legal consequences for their actions. In 2009, the
concept of absolute accountability was established,
holding everyone and everything accountable for
their actions, including the government. This
relieves affected parties of the responsibility of
establishing causation and makes polluters more
conscientious about their actions. Trials have been
held on international environmental issues, and the
United States has instituted the power to punish
environmental offenders, [36]. An Indian citizen
files a lawsuit against the government for polluting
the Ganges, a sacred river in Hinduism, [37]. The
Indian government has outlawed polluting industries
along the Ganges, [38]. Similar environmental
issues, such as deforestation, occurred in Indonesia
[39]:
a. The governor of Riau Rusli Zainal has awarded
environmental permits for forest concessions
that have been linked to pollution and
corruption. The Supreme Court overturned
Zainal's sentence of 14 years in jail and a fine of
Rp. 1,000,000,000. The case raises important
questions about the regulation of environmental
licenses.
b. Suspected rule-breaking occurred during the
issuance of Industrial Plantation Forest (HTI)
licenses to PT. Lestari Unggul Makmur in the
Tebing Tinggi District, Bengkalis Regency,
Riau. Vice Regent of Bengkalis, Normansyah
Abdul Wahab, disregarded Rokemendasi, a
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
428
Volume 20, 2024
requirement for the issuance of HTI licenses by
the Minister of Forestry.
c. The National Training Education Center and
Sports School in Hambalang, Bogor, West Java,
had building flaws, according to the Audit
Board. According to the plaintiffs, the location
permits and the project site plans contradict
Bogor Regional Regulation No. 12 of 2009 on
Environmental Protection and Management.
d. In violation of Presidential Instruction No. 10 of
2011, Governor Irwandi Yusuf of Aceh issued a
permit to turn the area into Kalista Alam. There
are now just 17 health centers with wastewater
management systems, but the Surabaya City
Health Office has plans to construct WWTPs for
45 more in 2015.
When governments make mistakes in awarding
environmental licenses that lead to pollution, they
become legally responsible for cleaning up the mess
they've made. R. L. Rudiger:
In light of rising government involvement in
environmental protection, it is possible that the
state could be held liable for environmental
damage in some cases. Extra responsibility
arises only in the absence of proper
authorization. Administrative law can help, and
there may be legal recourse for improper
licensing or oversight”, [40].
According to Hikmahanto Juwana, "government
agencies are often entangled in disputes due to
issuing permits and licenses for company
operations," suggesting that the government can be
included as a defendant in environmental dispute
lawsuits. "For the sake of the public good, courts
have the authority to withdraw permits and licenses
without requiring payment of damages”, [41].
Due to loopholes in its implementation,
environmental law frequently leads to government
engagement in litigation, whether in the role of
plaintiff, enforcer, or defendant, [42]. At least until
it's put into action. Based on the author's research, it
is the duty of the state (and the government
specifically) to guarantee that its inhabitants can
reside in an environment free from hazards. The
duty of the state (and the government specifically)
to guarantee that its inhabitants can reside in an
environment free from hazards is ratified by
government regulation instead of Law No. 2 of 2022
on job development ("law 32/2009"), which
guarantees that "everyone has the right to a good
and healthy living environment as part of human
rights". The term "air pollution" is defined as "the
entry or inclusion of substances, energy, and/or
other components into the ambient air by human
activities, so that the ambient air quality drops to a
certain level that causes the ambient air to not fulfill
its function," according to Government Regulation
No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control ("PP
41/1999").
Air pollution from forest and land fires has led
to a smog calamity, producing ambiguous air that is
unable to do its job. Article 1365 of the Civil Code
establishes citizens' entitlement to a safe and healthy
environment as a tort actionable against the state or
government.
In this particular citizen litigation, the plaintiffs
are a group of Palangka Raya city residents who are
Indonesian nationals. These defendants are the
President (defendant I), the Minister of Environment
and Forestry (defendant II), the Minister of
Agriculture (defendant III), the Minister of Agrarian
and Spatial Planning (defendant IV), the Minister of
Health (defendant V), the Governor of Central
Kalimantan (defendant VI), and the Provincial
Parliament of Central Kalimantan (defendant VII) of
the Republic of Indonesia.
In the massive forest fires that have occurred
since 1997, the most recent of which occurred in
2015, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants have
been negligent in carrying out their duties or
mandates as rulers or state officials, resulting in
losses, both material and immaterial, ranging from
the presence of sick people to deaths due to haze,
[43].
The factors in Article 1365 of the Criminal
Code were utilized as a basis for the judge's
evaluation of the issue of smog coming from forest
fires in Central Kalimantan in 2015. Some of the
components considered in Article 1365 of the
Criminal Code include:
a. Illegal acts: The defendants—the president,
numerous ministers, the governor of Central
Kalimantan, and the DPRD—were blamed for
the repeated forest fires due to their subpar
efforts in preventing and combating the blazes.
b. Disadvantages: Smog disrupts a variety of
community activities, including schools and
airports, and links to a variety of health issues,
including respiratory distress syndrome and
diarrhea.
c. Error: consists of the defendant's carelessness
in performing obligations under the law.
d. Causal relationship (causality): The
defendants negligence worsened the forest fires,
leading to a smog calamity that had far-reaching
effects on the community.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
429
Volume 20, 2024
4.2 Legal Construction of Sustainable
Principles based on the Principles of
the Modern Legal Environment
towards Legal Construction
(Theoretical Approach Study)
4.2.1 Sustainable Principles of Legal Theory
based on the Principles of the Modern
Legal Environment
According to [44], there is a nested structure of
valid legal norms, with hypothetical and fictive
"basic norms" at the bottom of the pyramid. Similar
to the positivist school of thought, the H group
emphasizes internal coherence between standards
based on a hierarchy of rules, [45], as a
representative of the Positivist School attempting to
account for contemporary judicial developments,
[46], where rules set the tone for people's daily
lives. Societal or lifestyle shifts result from the
interplay between "primary rules of obligation"
(naturally enacted laws) and "secondary rules of
obligation" (the formal framework of legislation),
[47]. Adapt to the current legal system, [48].
According to [49], "Modernism" is a
philosophical movement and worldview that was
sparked by Descartes and bolstered by the
Enlightenment (Enlightenment/Aufklarung)
movement. Praxis's dualism sees the world in terms
of subject and object, which in turn leads to over-
objectification and resource depletion that
ultimately leads to ecological disaster. His
characterizes modern philosophy as an Anglo-Saxon
discipline that is empirical, analytical, dominant,
and universally acknowledged. [50], which is a
topic with serious enough issues to prompt
philosophers (and not just philosophers) to think
carefully about the issue at hand, consider
alternative perspectives, and put forth novel
arguments and conclusions. It is possible that the
environmental disaster originated from a lack of
knowledge of nature, which in turn caused people to
spend too little time in nature. [51], our scientific
understanding and worldview are at the heart of the
problem. If we change our perspective and
behaviour towards nature, we may discover a
solution to the problem, [52].
To lessen environmental damage and boost the
prospect of a sustainable future, the author stresses
the significance of incorporating theories into the
design of Environmental Law systems.
a. Politics Of Environmental Law.
Concerns about the environment are at the
heart of sustainable legal policies. Political
power, institutional authority, and
environmental policy. In Indonesia, the
environment suffers more from the
carelessness of the state than from
individual citizens. [53], the term "politics
of environmental law" describes the course
of legal policy in the area of environmental
sustainability. [54], the politics of
environmental law describe the overall
trajectory of legal policy in the area of
environmental sustainability. State policies
for environmental protection and
management are guided by environmental
law; however, these policies often fail to
adequately address environmental
challenges due to a lack of knowledge,
application, and enforcement of underlying
concepts and norms. [54], for the sake of
future generations' survival and the
environment's carrying capacity,
environmental policy should give top
priority to ecologically benign development
and the Sustainable Development
Principles, [55]. Governments frequently
commit environmental injustices, such as
disputes in the mining industry. In many
cases, people's calls for justice hit a brick
wall, while official government policy
declarations foster a condescending
mentality that prioritizes corporate profits
and investment rationale over alleviating
poverty on the ground.
b. Traditional knowledge and Local
Environmental Wisdom.
Traditional knowledge from indigenous and
non-indigenous peoples alike shapes how
we interact with the natural world, [56]. The
government's disregard for indigenous ideas
leaves the environment vulnerable to
destruction from individuals, groups, and
countries, even though indigenous
environmental law systems are preferable to
government-created ones.
c. Morals and Ethics for the environment.
The environmental injustice in Indonesia
has moved from the realm of abstraction to
the realm of ethics, necessitating a holistic
and all-encompassing approach to its
settlement. Lawrence M. Friedman defines
morality as the disposition to act following
social norms for no other reason than that
doing so is God's will, ethical, or religiously
obligatory. [57], a philosophical tradition
that opposes modernism and its results by
emphasising on human relationships and the
interplay between humans and their natural
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
430
Volume 20, 2024
surroundings.
d. Deep Ecology.
According to Fritjof Capra's article "Deep
Ecology: A New Paradigm,"
anthropocentrism is ecology because it
recognizes the intrinsic value of all living
things and sees the universe as a network of
interconnected and interdependent events.
This new ecological paradigm addresses
ethical concerns that systematically
endanger non-human life. The outdated
worldview cannot handle the complex
ethical issues of today, [58].
To protect key components of sustainable
development, the authors argue that environmental
regulations should be accidental, commensalist,
partial, sectoral, and bypass. To ensure that
environmental law safeguards all facets of
ecologically sustainable development, the authors
propose applying these four factors to canonical
legal sources:
a. An environmental policy is a set of rules
whose sole purpose is to establish order
among the various components of the
natural world.
b. Rules are an essential aspect of any
policy. However, various articles on
conservation and environmental
protection are studied and formed, even
though the non-environmental sector is
the primary focus of this type of
legislation. Environmental policies will
not conflict with any new or revised laws
or regulations that are mutually beneficial
and aligned. Each piece of legislation
should be reflective of the synthesis of
existing environmental policy patterns.
c. To encourage more people to get involved
in environmental development, laws go
above and beyond mere policy in the
sense that they are enforceable in all
industries.
As resource depletion, environmental
deterioration, and ecological collapse are all
potential outcomes of unchecked resource
extraction, modern environmental law places a
premium on sustainability as a guiding regulatory
principle. Ecologically responsible growth must be a
top economic priority. Since the environment and
natural resources are seen as both a capital for
economic expansion (a resource-based economy)
and a life-supporting system by those who practice
sustainable development, their functionality and
carrying capacity must be protected, Ecocentrism,
the philosophy of environmentally sound legal
concepts, has emerged as a result of recent
advancements in environmental ethics. [59], the
authors argue that the most recent environmental
rules should be based on some modern legal ideas
related to environmental protection:
a. Honoring Mother Nature
All major environmental law theories agree
that a healthy respect for nature is essential.
Humans, as the dominant species on Earth,
have a responsibility to treat all members of
the biosphere with dignity and compassion.
Traditional laws and their consideration of
ecological concerns stem from this guiding
idea.
b. Moral Obligation Towards Nature, often
known as the Principle of Environmental
Responsibility.
Since man is a cog in the cosmic wheel, he
must help keep it in working order. All
members of society share this duty. Man is
responsible for the environmental
devastation he causes. According to the
author's conceptualization, the state of the
environment is ultimately the fault of the
humans who control the planet's natural
systems. As a result, legal concepts such as
the polluter-pays principle and the principle
of absolute responsibility (strict liability)
have emerged in the field of environmental
law.
c. Principles of Environmental Care (Caring
for Nature)
This principle is motivated by a genuine
concern for the benefit of the natural world,
rather than self-interest. When people show
more concern for the natural world, it helps
them develop into self-aware, responsible
adults.
d. The Principle of Non-Breakability (Harm)
One must show responsibility, solidarity,
and care by, at the very least, avoiding any
actions that could endanger the lives of
other sentient beings in the cosmos. Caring
for, protecting, preserving, and restoring the
natural world, and refraining from acts like
cutting down trees and littering, are all
commensurate with moral duty and
responsibility.
e. Principles of life and harmony with nature
(Eco-life)
This guiding concept puts the spotlight on
what matters in life—not gluttony or
greed—but on value, quality, and a good
way of life. Worthy human existence in
harmony with the natural world has its
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
431
Volume 20, 2024
limits.
f. Principles of Environmental Justice
(Environmental Justice)
It is important to ensure that all members of
society have equal opportunities to
participate in discussions on the
management, preservation, and utilization of
resources. Because of the inherent inequity
between modern society and traditional
societies in terms of access to and control
over natural resources, the interests of
Indigenous Peoples require special
consideration under this guiding principle.
g. The Principle of Moral Integrity (Moral
Integrity)
To protect the interests of the planet, public
authorities should have an honorable
attitude and behave by the moral standards
that secure the public interest, as outlined in
this concept.
Because crises, ecological challenges, and
disasters are fundamentally caused by
misunderstandings, several number of principles
defined in environmental ethics must be pursued
and implemented in human life. To put it another
way, nature is something that can be manipulated
and used however one pleases. There must be a
conscious shift away from the current development
pattern. In addition to meeting people's material
needs, development must also protect and preserve
their social, cultural, and natural environments. The
consequences of our actions today will be felt not
only by us but by future generations as well.
Considering environmental ethics transforms
our understanding of the cosmos and our place in it.
As the most numerous and pervasive species on the
planet, humans are obligated to protect the
environment. This principle is foundational to
modern ecological law and has its roots in
customary law. Everyone has a role to play in
protecting the environment. This is why we must all
see environmental destruction as a shared
responsibility. Legal theories such as the "polluter-
pays principle" and "strict liability" represent the
belief that those responsible for harm should bear
the financial burden.
Caring about the environment goes beyond just
looking out for number one. A more self-aware and
mature human being has heightened their sense of
awareness of their immediate environment. The "Do
No Harm" principle emphasizes the importance of
not hurting other organisms, which aligns with our
moral code. Destroying the environment serves no
useful purpose, as our moral code makes clear.
We are urged by the "eco-life" ideology to
honor the limitations imposed by nature on our way
of life. Rather than focusing on material
accumulation, this lifestyle prioritizes a harmonious
coexistence with the natural world. Nevertheless,
environmental justice ensures equal opportunity for
all individuals, particularly Indigenous
communities, to access and utilize these resources.
More advanced societies should not forget or
overlook them. Moral integrity, especially among
public officials, ensures that environmental concerns
receive top priority. It stresses the significance of
holding beliefs and engaging in actions that
prioritize and safeguard the public interest,
particularly in the area of environmental protection.
In conclusion, we must no longer use
knowledge of nature indefinitely for human benefit.
There needs to be a broader consideration of
environmental, cultural, and social factors in our
approach to development. Future generations will
also feel the harm we create if we do not change our
ways.
4.2.2 Remedy for Environmental Law's Failure
to Protect Natural Rights Through
Construction
When there is a gap in the law, construction
(engineering) law steps in to provide guiding
principles and legal anchors. There are three distinct
types of construction (engineering law), [60]:
a. Analogy (abstraction). In law, an analogy occurs
when a rule is applied to a circumstance that is
almost identical to one that is explicitly
governed by the rule in question but for which
the outward manifestation (legal form) is
different.
b. Determination of Law). The law can be refined
by not applying it at all, applying it in a way
that differs from the requirements of the existing
written law, or handling it in such a way (subtly)
that no party is at fault.
c. The third type of argument is called a "contrario
argument," and it involves denying something
true, [61].
The author's earlier description of legal
construction must align with the law's interpretation,
namely:
a. A grammatical interpretation (grammatical
intepretatie) of a text. Regular people determine
the interpretation of the provisions or norms of
law (written) based on their understanding of
the language being used.
b. Relating to or based on the past. The history of
general law and, more specifically, the history
of lawmaking, clearly demonstrate its
historicity.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
432
Volume 20, 2024
c. Third, when we talk about systematic
interpretation, we're talking about an
interpretation that makes links between different
sections of the law or different pieces of
legislation.
d. Meaning as interpreted by society An
interpretation from a sociological perspective
takes into account the current social climate.
e. Original meaning Official interpretation (in
Dutch: authentieke interpretatie) is synonymous
with "authentic interpretation”.
f. A contrasting reading The term "comparative
interpretation" refers to the practice of deducing
meaning from different bodies of legislation by
contrasting and contrasting them.
There is less of an incentive for government
employees to prevent environmental damage due to
the proliferation of environmental standards that
overlap with one another, both in Indonesia and
around the world. To deal with potential issues in
the future, it is important to establish explicit rules
of environmental law. Integration, sustainable
usage, intergenerational fairness, and
intergenerational justice are important tenets of
sustainable development, which is still based on
anthropocentric concepts, [62].
As a generalization, protecting nature serves
human interests at the expense of the environment.
As with any kind of dominance or exploitation,
abstraction inevitably leads to abuse. It is crucial to
analyze how the law has been used to settle
environmental disputes, [63].
When abstracting from the reduction of value
and reality, it is important not to apply laws
mechanically. Taking such a path would elevate the
concept of legal certainty above justice itself. [64],
tragedies ensue, and the law is legitimately used to
oppress and plunder the natural world. [65], the goal
of progressive law is to move away from a
mechanical approach to the judicial process. The
affirmative (allowing the use of alternative
measures) progressive mode of judgment is not
submissive (completely subordinate to the
procedure). Taking affirmative action will result in
numerous constitutional violations, [66]. To violate
the rules, one must meet many conditions, including
[67]:
a. One should not consider the law as something
autonomous that exists outside of context, but
rather read it as such. Therefore, the law should
not be static but rather interpreted dynamically
and comprehensively, taking into account the
surrounding circumstances.
b. To comprehend the value and actuality of the
law, one must read it not only grammatically
(text) but also socially (context) and even
hermeneutically (interpretation of the deepest
meaning).
c. Bringing justice to the natural world requires
not simply following the letter of the law (rule
and logic), but also common sense, honesty,
wisdom, sensitivity, empathy, and dedication.
By ignoring established norms, progressive
legal theory ushers in a more flexible and
adaptable approach to jurisprudence, [68].
In progressive law, breaching the rules can lead
to a breakthrough in the reconstruction of existing
environmental law. Keep in mind that the officers in
charge of carrying out the plan must not only have a
high IQ (intelligence quotient) but also a high EQ
(emotional quotient) and IQ (spiritual quotient) to
be effective, [69].
Absolute responsibility is the standard in
corrections. Legislation based on crystal-clear
idelaitas (environmental species identification),
[70]. By combining them, law enforcement
personnel will develop a more enlightened mindset
and approach, It helps law enforcement agencies
think critically (in a unified way) so that they can
deliver substantive justice that goes beyond
formalities and legal texts, [71]. This method of
analysis and evaluation is the key to achieving
environmental justice on a global scale. But it's not
simple to evolve into a cutting-edge lawyer, [72]. A
comprehensive, progressive law has the potential to
solve the problem. The law should be applied
progressively from an abstract anthropocentric
perspective. We can break the rules with the
progressive justice of love, [73]. Concern for the
natural world can inspire us to make value
judgments that go beyond the written word and the
purely mechanical. The interests of natural rights
can be protected by a progressive legal system that
provides substantive justice for nature, [74]. Finally,
we'll adopt a more ecologically-minded,
interdisciplinary approach to evaluation. This means
that concern for the environment and the pursuit of
justice are both crucial.
Table 2 (Appendix) presents the context of
Indonesian legislation, Law of the Republic of
Indonesia number 6 of 2023 concerning the
determination of government regulations in lieu of
Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning job creation
causes ambiguity in the criteria for important impact
activities that require Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA). The solution to this is the
establishment of a new, clearer legal basis that
prioritises environmental protection. Article 52 of
Law No. 5 of 1960 on the basic regulation of
agrarian subjects is also considered to be vague and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
433
Volume 20, 2024
tends to override environmental protection,
requiring significant changes to more severe
sanctions for perpetrators of environmental damage.
In the context of forest management, articles 50 and
78 of Law No. 41 of 1999 handed over the forest
management licence completely to the central
government without regard to the local sector, so the
removal of central authority in sustainable forest
management was necessary. For Article 51-58 of
Law No. 22 of 2001 on oil and gas, where a crime is
committed by a business entity, the sanction is only
a fine, indicating the need for non-discriminatory
and even harsher enforcement, especially for
elements of the government that commit crimes.
Finally, Article 39 of Law No. 18 of 2008 on Waste
Management has a definition of imported waste that
is still too vague, demanding clarity and firmness in
regulation.
Since the Constitution of 1945, government
environmental legislation has been faulty, with
various restrictions and fines aimed at bettering the
economy while exempting the environment. Long-
term damage and implications for the ecosystem
have resulted from a lack of attention to
environmental protection. The government must set
strict environmental penalties, quantify the cost of
the damage in terms of human lives and material
goods, and take appropriate action to address this
problem. Re-adopting Indonesia's customary legal
system, which emphasizes accountability for
environmental upkeep and restoration as well as the
exclusion of wrongdoers, can reduce the occurrence
of environmental degradation.
To ensure the long-term health of the global
economy and the diversity of life on Earth, the
government must also implement a comprehensive
system of renewable environmental regulations and
environmentally beneficial investments. This
method has the highest rate of growth in global
financial markets and has a beneficial effect on both
the environment and society. Integrating local
customs with worldwide environmental protection
issues can lead to the development of clear and
definitive laws for protecting the environment.
5 Conclusion
Preventing ecological disasters, caused by humans'
mistaken view of nature as a resource for their gain,
requires the government to implement strict
environmental regulations into existing programs.
This research highlights the critical need to update
development plans to balance environmental, social,
cultural, and economic concerns; doing so will
protect the legacy for the next generation and restore
public trust in the government as an advocate for
environmental protection rather than an adversary.
The present lack of sufficient environmental
regulations, marked by weak administrative
penalties that do not match the seriousness of
ecological harm, necessitates the passage of strong
laws similar to those dealing with drugs and
corruption, guaranteeing strong penalties for
environmental violations.
The findings of this study have important
ramifications for the future of environmental and
community activism in the fight against short-
sighted development ambitions and for the shift in
policymaking paradigms within governments
towards greater restraint and ecological harmony.
Future research should delve further into the
complexities of the effectiveness of environmental
policies and the methods of legal enforcement, as
this study does have some limitations. To promote a
culture of responsibility and environmental
protection, as well as to set Indonesia on a path
toward sustainable development and ecological
resilience, this study's recommendations call for a
complete revision of environmental laws, with a
focus on the implementation of severe punishments
for environmental violations.
References:
[1] P. W. Birnie dan A. E. Boyle, International
Law & The Environment. Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1992.
[2] G. Mayeda, “Where Should Johannesburg
Take Us? Ethical and Legal Approaches to
Sustainable Development in the Context of
International Environmental Law,” Colo J.
Int. Law Policy, vol. 15, no. 1, 2004.
[3] F. and A. Organization, “FAO, Rome &
AGP, & Convention, Government & (Italy,
Rome & Nov,. (2023). Report of the
Government Consultation on the
International Plant Protection Convention,
Rome, Italy, 15-19 November 1976,” Rome,
2023.
[4] V. H. Duong, “Green Countervailing Duites
For Natural Resource Conservation,” dalam
1st Conference on Innovative Philosophy and
Law: Rethinking Life and Normative Order
in a World of Conflicting Values:
Transdisciplinary Perspectives from Asia,
Ho Chi Minh City, 2022, pp.363-377.
[5] S. Palutturi, “Comparison between healthy
cities and Adipura in Indonesia,” Malays. J.
Med. Health Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp.35-43,
2013.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
434
Volume 20, 2024
[6] S. Hoban dkk., “Genetic Diversity Targets
and Indicators In The CBD Post-2020 Global
Biodiversity Framework Must Be
Improved,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 248, 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654
.
[7] E. Bristol-Alagbariya, “UN Convention to
Combat Desertification as an International
Environmental Regulatory Framework for
Protecting and Restoring the World’s Land
towards a Safer, More Just and Sustainable
Future. 11, 132, Int. J. Energy Environ. Res.,
vol. 11, no. 1, pp.1-32, 2023,
https://doi.org/10.37745/ijeer.13/vol11n1132
.
[8] P. Senna, A. da C. Reis, I. L. Santos, dan A.
C. Dias, “Healthcare supply chain risk
management in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: What
is the current situation?,” Work, vol. 72, no.
2, pp.511–527, 2022,
https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-205216.
[9] L. Hens dan B. Nath, The World Summit on
Sustainable Development: The Johannesburg
Conference. Springer Dordrecht, 2005,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3653-1.
[10] Y. Zhang, Z. Peng, Z. Dong, M. Wang, dan
C. Jiang, “Twenty years of achievements in
China’s implementation of the Stockholm
Convention,” Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., vol.
16, no. 12, 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-022-1587-7.
[11] B. E. Umukoro, “Revisiting the non-
justiciability issue in environmental rights
dialogue in Nigeria,” Environ. Law Rev., vol.
25, no. 2, hlm. 101–119, 2023,
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529231168491.
[12] S. of the U. N. F. C. on C. Change, “Climate
Change Education as an Integral Part of the
United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change,” J. Educ. Sustain. Dev., vol.
6, no. 2, hlm. 237–239, 2012,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475203.
[13] T. Hickmann, O. Widerberg, M. Lederer, dan
P. Pattberg, “The United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as
an orchestrator in global climate
policymaking,” Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 87,
no. 1, hlm. 21–38, 2021,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319840425.
[14] D. A. Bakung, V. S. Putri, M. H. Muhtar, W.
A. Dungga, dan N. Junus, “Criticizing
potential deviations in the role of
environmental impact analysis after the
enactment of the job creation law,” E3S Web
Conf., vol. 506, hlm. 06005, 2024, doi:
10.1051/e3sconf/202450606005.
[15] M. H. Rahman, D. Naito, M. Moeliono, Y.
Mitani, dan A. I. Susaeta, “Oil palm and
rubber-driven deforestation in Indonesia and
Malaysia (2000-2021) and efforts toward
zero deforestation commitments,” 2023,
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2945587/v1.
[16] T. B. Razak, L. Boström-Einarsson, C. A. G.
Alisa, R. T. Vida, dan T. A. Lamont, “Coral
reef restoration in Indonesia: A review of
policies and projects,” Mar. Policy, vol. 137,
2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.10494
0.
[17] M. Syukri, M. S. Mawardi, L. Amelia, A. N.
Asyah, dan M. A. Iswara, “Balancing
Conservation and Community Welfare:
Enhancing the Management of Marine
Protected Areas in Indonesia,” Work. Pap.,
Art. no. 006bf288-32fd-448d-bce4-
473379bcd056, [Online].
https://ideas.repec.org//p/avg/wpaper/en1638
4.html (Accessed Date: March 2, 2024).
[18] A. B. Sambah, M. F. F. Fardilah, M. A. Z.
Fuad, dan M. A. Rahman, “Fishing Ground
Mapping of Demersal Fish in The Riau
Islands Province Waters Related to the
Oceanographic Factors,” IOP Conf. Ser.
Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 934, no. 1,
pp.012061, Nov 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-
1315/934/1/012061.
[19] Y. Kim dan V. Radoias, “Severe Air
Pollution Exposure and Long-Term Health
Outcomes,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public.
Health, vol. 19, no. 21, pp.14019, 2022,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114019.
[20] R. Putri, I. Idris, R. G. Catur, dan I.
Immamulhadi, “Strategies to Overcome
Marine Pollution Caused by Plastic Waste to
Protect Marine Environment in Indonesia,”
Kosmik Huk., vol. 21, no. 3, 182, 2021, doi:
10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i3.12047.
[21] M. Ariyani dkk., “Pyrethroid residues in
Indonesian river Citarum: A simple
analytical method applied for an ecological
and human health risk assessment,”
Chemosphere, vol. 335, 139067, 2023, doi:
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139067.
[22] P. Darmawel, “Usability Analysis On The
Endangered Indonesian Animals And Plants
Augmented Reality Application,” J. Techno
Nusa Mandiri, vol. 17, no. 2, pp.79-86, 2020,
doi: 10.33480/techno.v17i2.1458.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
435
Volume 20, 2024
[23] C. D. Stone, “Should Trees have
Standing?— Toward Legal Rights for
Natural Objects,” South. Calif. Law Rev.,
vol. 45, pp.450-501, 1972.
[24] M. Harvey, “Citizen Justice: The
Environmental Legacy of William O.
Douglas—Public Advocate and Conservation
Champion. By M. Margaret McKeown,”
West. Hist. Q., vol. 54, no. 3, pp.253-254,
2023, https://doi.org/10.1093/whq/whad055.
[25] I. R. RS, M. H. Muhtar, A. A. Harun, D. A.
Bakung, dan N. Junus, “Protection of Human
Rights Against the Environment in the
Indonesian Legal System,” J. Law Sustain.
Dev., vol. 11, no. 10, pp.e570–e570, 2023.
[26] R. Ronaldo dan T. Suryanto, “Green finance
and sustainability development goals in
Indonesian Fund Village,” Resour. Policy,
vol. 78, 102839, Sep 2022, doi:
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102839.
[27] E. R. Mahardika dan M. A. Bayu, “Legal
Politics of Indonesian Environmental
Management: Discourse between
Maintaining Environmental Sustainability
and Economic Interests,” Indones. J.
Environ. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1,
Art. no. 1, Jan 2022, doi:
10.15294/ijel.v1i1.56781.
[28] E. D. Indriati, S. Ana, dan N. Nugroho,
“Philosophy Of Law And The Development
Of Law As A Normative Legal Science,” Int.
J. Educ. Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no.
1, Feb 2022, doi: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.293.
[29] A. Askari, “Balancing Civil and Political
Rights: Constitutional Court Powers in
Indonesia and Austria,” J. Indones. Leg.
Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp.1311–1360, 2023.
[30] M. A. Pickering, “The Company as a
Separate Legal Entity,” Mod. Law Rev., vol.
31, no. 5, pp.481–511, 1968, doi:
10.1111/j.1468-2230.1968.tb01206.x.
[31] I. Suryani, M. H. Muhtar, Y. M. Rahman, B.
P. M. Jaya, dan A. A. Khalaf, “Integration of
Islamic Law in Regional Development in
Indonesia,” JURIS J. Ilm. Syariah, vol. 22,
no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr 2023, doi:
10.31958/juris.v22i1.8770.
[32] P. Harris, An Introduction to Law.
Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[33] W. A. Dungga, M. H. Muhtar, dan L.
Djaafar, “The Assessment of Indonesia’s
Religious Courts in Resolving Shari’ah
Banking Disputes According to the
Principles of Justice,” Manch. J. Transnatl.
Islam. Law Amp Pract., vol. 19, no. 3, 179,
Sep 2023, [Online].
https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:1
74026164?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsc
o:gcd:174026164 (Accessed Date: March 2,
2024).
[34] D. Perkumienė, R. Pranskūnienė, M.
Vienažindienė, dan J. Grigienė, “The Right
to A Clean Environment: Considering Green
Logistics and Sustainable Tourism,” Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 17, no. 9,
Art. no. 9, Jan 2020, doi:
10.3390/ijerph17093254.
[35] R. N. Azhari, “Understanding the Contents
of Indonesian Civil Law,” J. Indones. Leg.
Stud., vol. 5, hlm. 263, 2020.
[36] E. K. Purwendah, Rusito, A. Awaludin, dan
I. D. S. Triana, “Public Participation in
Environmental Protection: Citizen Law Suits
in the Indonesian Civil Justice System,” IOP
Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1030, no.
1, 012022, Jun 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-
1315/1030/1/012022.
[37] MC.Mehta v.Union of India, AIR 1988 SC
1037 Gangga Pollution (Tanneries) Case.
[38] R. Pant, “From Communities Hands to
MNCs’ BOOTs: A Case Study from India on
Right to Water,” United Kingdom, 2003.
[39] M. H. Muhtar, A. A. Harun, V. S. Putri, A.
Apripari, dan M. R. Moha, “Addressing the
paradox: Why environmental
constitutionalism is more than just rights?,”
E3S Web Conf., vol. 506, 06004, 2024, doi:
10.1051/e3sconf/202450606004.
[40] R. Lummert, “Changes in Civil Liability
Concept,” dalam IUCN, Trends in
Environmental Policy and Law, Berlin: Erich
Schmidt Verlag, 1980, pp.245–252.
[41] H. Juwana, “Dispute Resolution Process in
Indonesia,” dalam IDE Asian Series No.21
Dispute Resolution Process in Asia
(Indonesia), Japan: Institute of Developing
Economies (IDE-JETRO), 2003, 90.
[42] H. Hickok, Introduction to Environmental
Law. United States of America: Delmar
Publishers, 1996.
[43] Z. Abdussamad, A. A. Harun, M. H. Muhtar,
F. U. Puluhulawa, V. Swarianata, dan N. F.
Elfikri, “Constitutional balance:
Synchronizing energy and environmental
policies with socio-economic mandates,”
E3S Web Conf., vol. 506, 06006, 2024, doi:
10.1051/e3sconf/202450606006.
[44] H. Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State.
New York: Russell & Russell, 1945.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
436
Volume 20, 2024
[45] H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law. London:
Oxford University Press, 1972.
[46] M. Zaid, H. Hartiwiningsih, dan M.
Rustamaji, “Legal Framework for the
Development of the Indonesian Economy:
Mochtar Kusumaatmadja’s Perspective,”
dipresentasikan pada International
Conference on Law, Economic & Good
Governance (IC-LAW 2023), Atlantis Press,
Feb 2024, pp.51–56. doi: 10.2991/978-2-
38476-218-7_9.
[47] R. M. Unger, Law and Modern Society,
Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New
Yok: The Free Press, 1976.
[48] E. Ehrlich dan K. A. Ziegert, Fundamental
Principles of the Sociology of Law. New
York: Routledge, 2001. doi:
10.4324/9780203791127.
[49] M. Kato, “Challenges of environmental
problems to the philosophy of education,”
Policy Futur. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp.7–19,
Jan 2015, doi: 10.1177/1478210314566728.
[50] P. M. S. Hacker, Wittgenstein: Comparisons
and Context. OUP Oxford, 2013.
[51] M. E. Phillips, “Reconnecting with nature: an
ecofeminist view of environmental
management,” Geogr. Res., vol. 58, no. 2,
pp.154–166, 2020, doi: 10.1111/1745-
5871.12388.
[52] W.-T. Fang, A. Hassan, dan B. A. LePage,
“Environmental Ethics: Modelling for
Values and Choices,” dalam The Living
Environmental Education: Sound Science
toward a Cleaner, Safer, and Healthier
Future, W.-T. Fang, A. Hassan, dan B. A.
LePage, Ed., Singapore: Springer Nature,
2023, pp.151–174. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-
4234-1_6.
[53] M. S. Islam, “Sustainability through the Lens
of Environmental Sociology: An
Introduction,” Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 3,
Art. no. 3, Mar 2017, doi:
10.3390/su9030474.
[54] N. Listiyani dan M. Y. Said, “Political Law
on the Environment: The Authority of the
Government and Local Government to File
Litigation in Law Number 32 Year 2009 on
Environmental Protection and Management,”
Resources, vol. 7, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Des
2018, doi: 10.3390/resources7040077.
[55] S. Hamidah, M. Bakri, A. R. Budiono, dan
B. Winarno, “the Analysis of Islamic
Economy in the Constitution of Indonesia,”
Brawijaya Law J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp.59–76,
2017,
http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.0
1.03.
[56] F. A. A. Ifrani, A. H. Barkatullah, Y.
Nurhayati, dan M. Y. Said, “Forest
management based on local culture of Dayak
Kotabaru in the perspective of customary law
for a sustainable future and prosperity of the
local community,” Resources, vol. 8, no. 2,
pp.1–17, 2019, doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020078.
[57] L. M. Friedman, The Legal System: A Social
Science Perspective. Russell Sage
Foundation, 1975.
[58] F. Capra, The Web of Life: A New Scientific
Understanding of Living Systems. New York:
Doubleday, 1996.
[59] I. M. G. B. W. Wibowo, “Legal Renewal:
The Relationship of Business Law, Local
Wisdom and The Tourism Industry,”
dipresentasikan pada International
Conference on “Changing of Law: Business
Law, Local Wisdom and Tourism Industry”
(ICCLB 2023), Atlantis Press, Des 2023,
pp.690–697. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-180-
7_74.
[60] L.-Y. He dan X.-F. Qi, “Environmental
Courts, Environment and Employment:
Evidence from China,” Sustainability, vol.
13, no. 11, Art. no. 11, Jan 2021, doi:
10.3390/su13116248.
[61] A. Wagner, W. Werner, dan D. Cao,
Interpretation, Law and the Construction of
Meaning. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands,
2007. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5320-7.
[62] V. J. P. D. Martinho dan A. J. D. Ferreira,
“Forest resources management and
sustainability: The specific case of european
union countries,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no.
1, 58, 2020, doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010058.
[63] K. E. Chuluu, “Environmental Justice in
Asia,” dalam The Palgrave Handbook of
Global Sustainability, Cham: Springer
International Publishing, 2020, pp.1-13. doi:
10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_76-3.
[64] F. Simlinger dan B. Mayer, “Legal
Responses to Climate Change Induced Loss
and Damage,” dalam Loss and Damage from
Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and
Policy Options, R. Mechler, L. M. Bouwer,
T. Schinko, S. Surminski, dan J. Linnerooth-
Bayer, Ed., Cham: Springer International
Publishing, 2019, pp.179–203. doi:
10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_7.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
437
Volume 20, 2024
[65] I. Wallimann-Helmer, L. Meyer, K. Mintz-
Woo, T. Schinko, dan O. Serdeczny, “The
Ethical Challenges in the Context of Climate
Loss and Damage,” dalam Loss and Damage
from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods
and Policy Options, R. Mechler, L. M.
Bouwer, T. Schinko, S. Surminski, dan J.
Linnerooth-Bayer, Ed., Cham: Springer
International Publishing, 2019, pp.39–62.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_2.
[66] J. Bai, L. Dou, X. Li, X. Ma, F. Lu, dan Z.
Han, “Evolution Laws of Stress–Energy and
Progressive Damage Mechanisms of
Surrounding Rock Induced by Mining
Disturbance,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 13, Art.
no. 13, Jan 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13137759.
[67] A. Banikhalid dan M. Rahbeh, “The Role of
the Law in Prompting Environmental
Stewardship for Farms Located Near
Phosphate Mines,” Sustainability, vol. 16,
no. 3, Art. no. 3, Jan 2024, doi:
10.3390/su16031140.
[68] H. Quane, “Legal Pluralism and International
Human Rights Law: Inherently Incompatible,
Mutually Reinforcing or Something in
Between?,” Oxf. J. Leg. Stud., vol. 33, no. 4,
pp.675–702, Des 2013, doi:
10.1093/ojls/gqt018.
[69] O. J. Gstrein, M. Fröhlich, C. van den Berg,
dan T. Giegerich, Modernising European
Legal Education (MELE): Innovative
Strategies to Address Urgent Cross-Cutting
Challenges. Springer Nature, 2023.
[70] A. P. Lavers dan D. E. Shiers, “Construction
law and environmental harm: The liability
interface,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 18,
no. 8, pp.893–902, 2000, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190010001201.
[71] K. Abbass, M. Z. Qasim, H. Song, M.
Murshed, H. Mahmood, dan I. Younis, “A
review of the global climate change impacts,
adaptation, and sustainable mitigation
measures,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol.
29, no. 28, pp.42539–42559, 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6.
[72] S. Asseng dkk., “Uncertainty in simulating
wheat yields under climate change,” Nat.
Clim. Change, vol. 3, no. 9, hlm. 827–832,
2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1916.
[73] C. Cooper, A. Booth, J. Varley-Campbell, N.
Britten, dan R. Garside, “Defining the
process to literature searching in systematic
reviews: a literature review of guidance and
supporting studies,” BMC Med. Res.
Methodol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp.1-14, 2018,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3.
[74] D. Balsalobre-Lorente, L. Ibáñez-Luzón, M.
Usman, dan M. Shahbaz, “The
environmental Kuznets curve, based on the
economic complexity, and the pollution
haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries,”
Renew. Energy, vol. 185, pp. 1441–1455,
2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.059.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
438
Volume 20, 2024
APPENDIX
Table 1. Differences in the characteristics of ordinary Civil Lawsuits, Class Action, Judicial Review, Legal
Standing, and Citizen Lawsuit
Characteristics
Ordinary Civil
Lawsuit
Class Action
Legal standing
Citizen Lawsuit
Terminology
Lawsuit for
Unlawful Actions
Class Action
Non-
Governmental
Organization
Lawsuit
Citizen Lawsuit
Philosophy
Fighting for
individual
interests
There is a lack of belief in
individualism and a need
to simplify the mechanism
for lawsuits with
representatives.
NGOs and non-
governmental
organizations as
guardians
Individuals fight for the public
interest so that state
administrators can improve
policies that are deemed
detrimental to the interests of
the public or citizens.
Relationship of
Interest
Direct, real, and
measurable
interests (real and
tangible)
Direct, real, and
measurable interests
(real and tangible)
Has no direct
interest
Does not have real and
measurable interests
Demands
Material
compensation for
specific actions
Material compensation and
specific actions
Certain actions
and out-of-pocket
expenses
Certain actions in the form of
the implementation of legal
obligations by the state
administration (ruling)
Subject
Plaintiff
Directly harmed
individuals
Class members and class
representatives play
important roles in the
class.
Organizations that
fulfill the specified
requirements
Citizens or non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) with
legal standing
Defendant
Individuals or
legal entities
Individuals or legal entities
Individuals, legal
entities, and state
administrators
State administrators (President,
Ministries, State-Owned
Enterprises)
Notifications
No notification is
required.
Notifications from class
representatives and class
members
No notification
required
Notification from the plaintiff
to the defendant
Table 2. Regulations that need to be revised
No
Problematic rules
Impact of the Problem
The solution
1.
Law of the Republic of
Indonesia Number 6 of 2023
concerning Stipulation of
Government Regulations in
Lieu of Law Number 2 of
2022 concerning Job Creation
Becomes Law
1. The criteria for important impact
activities that require AMDAL
(Environmental Impact Analysis)
are unclear.
2. The Amdal assessment has the
potential to lose its public character.
3. Public participation is significantly
reduced.
4. Eliminate environmental permits.
5. Replace it with an environmental
approval or business permit.
6. Potential for usurping the territory
of customary law communities.
A new legal foundation
is necessary to protect
and include clear
concepts of legal
principles and norms
related to the
environment through
regulations that are
clearer and parallel to
those that neglect
sustainable
environmental
protection.
2.
Article 52 of Law No. 5 of
1960 concerning Basic
Regulations on Agrarian
Principles (LN No. 104 of
1960; TLN No. 2043);
1. The article that defines the point of
paying attention to "economically weak
parties" is still too absurd and seems to
put aside environmental protection.
2. Relatively short shortfalls with fines that
still follow the previous exchange rate.
3. Collecting forest products or the like does
not require local wisdom but is based on
government decisions that do not know
the origins of customary land ownership
in several areas.
Significant changes need to be
made to the form of sanctions
that are more severe and firm
against perpetrators who cause
environmental damage,
ranging from the length of
imprisonment to fines. In
addition, it is crucial to shift
the environmental mindset
from supporting the economy
to prioritizing the economy for
the environment.
3.
Articles 50 and 78 of Law No.
41 of 1999 concerning
Forestry (LN No. 167 of 1999;
1. Forest management permits are only
given to the central government without
paying attention to the local sector as a
Central authority in
sustainable forest management
is eliminated but handed over
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
439
Volume 20, 2024
No
Problematic rules
Impact of the Problem
The solution
TLN No. 3888);
culture that develops in each region
2. Prison deductions, which can be replaced
by fines, So that perpetrators of
environmental damage do not receive a
deterrent effect from these regulations.
to the respective community
areas. The emphasis on
physical confinement is not to
be replaced by a fine but must
be accompanied by a fine so
that it does not reduce the
prison term when the
perpetrator has paid the fine.
4.
Articles 51–58 of Law No. 22
of 2001 concerning Oil and
Natural Gas
(LN No.104 of 1960; TLN
No.2043)
1. If a criminal act is committed by a
business entity or permanent
establishment, the penalty imposed on the
business entity or permanent
establishment is a fine, with the highest
provision being that the fine is increased
by one-third.
2. Every person who imitates or falsifies oil
and gas fuel and processed products as
intended in Article 28 paragraph (1) shall
be punished with imprisonment for a
maximum of six years and a maximum
fine of IDR 60,000,000,000.00 (sixty
billion rupiah).
Enforcement of punishment
for perpetrators of
environmental damage must
not be selective; it must be
given emphasis and even be
more severe if it is an element
of the government itself that
commits the crime.
Innovations carried out by the
community in managing
petroleum should not be
punished; instead, they should
be provided with clear
assistance and support so that
they can provide solutions in
the future.
5.
Article 39 of Law No. 18 of
2008 concerning Waste
Management (LN)
No. 69 of 2008; TLN No.
4851);
1. The definition of imported waste is still
too absurd.
2. The maximum prison sentence is 12
years, and the fine is only $5 billion
Clear confirmation regarding
waste imports and legal
sanctions must be maximized,
including fines, and
accompanied by international
sanctions for countries as
perpetrators.
6.
Articles 158–165 of Law No.
4 of 2009 concerning Mineral
and Coal Mining (LN No. 4 of
2009; TLN No. 4959);
1. Holders of IUP1, IUPK2, IPR3, or SIPB4
who deliberately submit reports as
intended in Article 70 letter e, Article 105
paragraph (4), Article 110, or Article 111
paragraph (1) incorrectly or submit false
information shall be punished with a
maximum prison sentence of five (five)
years and a maximum fine of Rp.
100,000,000,000.00 (one hundred billion
rupiah).
2. Any person whose IUP or IUPK is
revoked or expires and fails to perform:
a. reclamation and/or post-mining; and/or
b. placement of reclamation guarantee
funds and/or post-mining guarantee funds
will face a maximum imprisonment of
five (5) years and a maximum fine of
IDR 100,000,000,000 (one hundred
billion rupiah).
3. The provisions of Article 165 are deleted.
If a business license holder
makes a mistake, they must be
given imprisonment for more
than 10 years and a fine of
more than $100 billion. So
that it can protect a sustainable
environment and provide a
deterrent effect to perpetrators.
Reclamation and/or post-
mining; and/or b. placement of
reclamation guarantee funds
and/or post-mining guarantee
funds. The reclamation
guarantee funds and/or post-
mining guarantee funds must
be significantly larger than the
damage caused, as the
environment takes thousands
of years to repair itself.
7.
Article 64 of Law No. 10 of
2009 concerning Tourism (LN
No. 11)
The year 2009 (TLN No.
4966)
1. Anyone who intentionally and unlawfully
damages the physical tourist attraction as
stated in Article 27 will face a maximum
imprisonment of 7 (seven) years and a
maximum fine of IDR 10,000,000,000.00
(ten billion rupiah).
2. Any person who, through negligence and
against the law, physically damages or
reduces the value of a tourist attraction as
There needs to be a firm and
clear article regarding
environmental destroyers,
including tourism and ecology
in the area itself. Among them
are progressive sanctions not
only against the perpetrator
but also against related parties
who indirectly participated in
1
Mining License Terms of Production Operations
2
Special Mining Business License
3
A Space Utilization Permit is required.
4
Rock Mining License
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
440
Volume 20, 2024
No
Problematic rules
Impact of the Problem
The solution
intended in Article 27 shall be punished
by imprisonment for a maximum of 1
(one) year and/or a fine of a maximum of
IDR 5,000,000,000.00 (five billion
rupiah).
the act of destruction. So that
the domino effect of the norm
sanctions can be applied
efficiently.
8.
Article 98-120 of Law No. 32
of 2009 concerning
Environmental Protection and
Management (LN No. 140 of
2009; TLN No. 5059);
1. Every person who intentionally commits
an act that results in exceeding the
ambient air quality standards, water
quality standards, seawater quality
standards, or environmental damage
standard criteria shall be punished by
imprisonment for a minimum of 3 (three)
years and a maximum of 10 (ten) years
and a fine of at least IDR
3,000,000,000.00 (three billion rupiahs)
and a maximum of IDR
10,000,000,000.00 (ten billion rupiahs).
2. Every person who releases and/or
distributes genetic engineering products
to environmental media in violation of
statutory regulations or environmental
permits as intended in Article 69,
paragraph (1), letter g, shall be punished.
Implementation of regulations
for the protection of
environmental quality
standards needs to be
accompanied by the
implementation of regulations
that are deemed to be
inadequate in terms of human
resources and performance
support facilities, as well as
derivative regulations for
implementation and measures
for violations of quality
standards based on existing,
needed, and used criteria. Not
to be punished, but to give
space to parties, in this case,
the community, who can make
genetic engineering into
environmental media, which is
good for the environment.
9.
Articles 9 and 85 of Law No.
45 of 2009 concerning
Amendments to Law No. 31
of 2004 concerning Fisheries
(LN No. 154 of 2004; TIN No.
5073);
1. Ownership, control, carrying, and/or use
of fishing gear and/or fishing aids that
disturb and damage the sustainability of
fish resources on fishing vessels in the
fisheries management area of the
Republic of Indonesia are prohibited for
every person. (2) Provisions regarding
fishing gear and/or fishing aids that
disturb and damage the sustainability of
fish resources, as intended in paragraph
(1), are regulated by a Ministerial
Regulation.
Law enforcement should not
only be used when the
equipment is used but must
also be prevented from doing
so, namely by providing
regulations for parties who
store basic equipment to be
able and/or used to damage
environmental quality
standards. Regulations should
impose the same sanctions for
damage to quality standards
and fish resources in the
environment. marine,
brackish, and fresh waters.
10.
Articles 8, 12, 82-109, and so
on. Law No. 18 of 2013
concerning Prevention and
Eradication of Forest
Destruction (LN No. 130 of
2013; TLN No. 5432);
1. Everyone is prohibited from carrying out
activities in the forest that could disrupt
forest destruction
2. Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning the
Prevention and Eradication of Forest
Destruction, often referred to as the P3H
Law, is a special criminal law that is
intended to eradicate organized forest
crime and forest crime committed by
corporations.
3. no distinction between communities still
have a relationship with forests, in this
case, customary forests.
State losses, damage to socio-
cultural life and the
environment, and an increase
in global warming have all
resulted from forest
devastation, particularly in the
forms of illicit logging,
mining without permission,
and crops without permits.
Forest destruction has evolved
into a highly organized,
transnational, and
sophisticated crime that has
the potential to endanger
people's lives and undermine
efforts to prevent and
eradicate the practice.
Therefore, a solid legal
framework is necessary to
ensure the efficacy of law
enforcement in this fight.
11.
Article 49, Law No. 32 of
2014 concerning Maritime
Affairs (LN No. 294 of 2014;
TLN No. 5603);
1. Every person who makes permanent use
of marine space who does not have a
location permit as intended in Article 47,
paragraph (1), shall be punished with a
There must be confirmation
that is tailored to the needs
and wisdom of local
communities in handling
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
441
Volume 20, 2024
No
Problematic rules
Impact of the Problem
The solution
maximum imprisonment of six (six) years
and a maximum fine of Rp.
20,000,000,000.00 (two tens of billions
of rupiah).
licensing. 2. spatial planning
and zoning; 3. sanitation
provisions; 4. Reducing the
Authority/Role of Regional
Government; 5. Withdrawal of
Authority from the Minister to
the Central Government; 6.
Community Involvement; 7.
Foreign Investment or
Foreign-Owned Businesses; 8.
Provisions for Small
Fishermen; 9. Other
Obligations; 10. National
Commission for the
Assessment of Fish Resources
11. Provisions for Fishery
Quality Standards; and 12.
Changes in Other Document
Forms.
12.
Articles 26, 36, 68-74 of Law
No. 17 of 2019 concerning
Water Resources (LN)
No. 190 of 2019; TLN No.
6405).
1. Activities resulting in the following are
prohibited: a. disruption of the water
system conditions of the Suneai
Watershed; b. damage to water sources
and/or infrastructure; c. disruption of
water preservation efforts; and D. water
pollution.
2. Water conservation, as referred to in
environmental protection, is still too
expensive to be combined with
sustainable environmental protection.
3. The damage caused and its long-term
effects still outweigh the relatively low
sanctions and fines.
There must be an emphasis on
prohibiting the destruction of
water resources in an
unequivocal form and type.
The combination of
conservation, quality
standards, and environmental
sustainability of the basic
sources of one of the main
ecosystems of the
environment.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
- Yohanes Suhardin led the conceptualization of the
study, designed the methodology, and supervised
the entire research project. Yohanes also
contributed to the writing and substantial revision
of the abstract and conclusion sections, ensuring
the integrity of data analysis and interpretation.
- Rudy Haposan Siahaan was in charge of data
collection and normative legal analysis, as well as
writing sections on the application of
contemporary legal theory in the context of
Indonesian environmental degradation in
Indonesia.
- Rolib Sitorus contributed to research and analysis
related to more advanced principles of
environmental law principles, as well as
developing sections discussing legal solutions to
environmental issues.
- Yudhi Priyo Amboro focused on research related
to administrative framework and regulation, as
well as compiling sections discussing the
importance of government transparency and
accountability in the context of environmental
law.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
This research did not receive external funding. All
costs associated with this scientific article's research
and production of this scientific article were covered
by the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this
research. The research was conducted with complete
objectivity, without influence or pressure from any
party that could affect the research results.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.40
Yohanes Suhardin, Rudy Haposan Siahaan,
Rolib Sitorus, Yudhi Priyo Amboro
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
442
Volume 20, 2024