Advancing Disaster Resilience through Targeted Training:
An Interdisciplinary Approach to Developing and Educating Safety and
Security Personnel
MICHAIL CHALARIS1,*, MARIA ROUSSI1, DIMITRA PINOTSI2, PARASKEVI GEORGIADOU2,
ANTONIS TARGOUTZIDIS2
1Department of Chemistry,
Democritus University of Thrace,
Saint Loukas Campus, Kavala,
GREECE
2Hellenic Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (ELINYAE),
143 Liosion & 6 Thirsiou, 104 45, Athens,
GREECE
*Corresponding Author
Abstract:- Responding to the continuing growth of protection complexity and/or private sector issues pertaining to
safety and security, continuous training revisions are mandatory. The SETOFF project deals with this need,
enhancing the preparedness of the targeted personnel through this particular e-training program. The SETOFF
project employs a comprehensive needs analysis, and focuses on the treatment of specific skill gaps so as to create
an e-training procedure, transversally designed, and specially oriented to all safety and security personnel involved
in natural disaster management. The present study reveals critical aspects of personnel’s skills inadequacies and
false assessment of the triggering primary causes. Training expectations usually diverge from the actual needs due
to inappropriate/misleading analysis of natural and man-made disasters, inefficient assessment of the evolving
dynamics, deficit with respect to training tactics, and limited access to actual disaster management drills. The
particular transversal approach pursues that training content is adaptive and comprehensive, effectively dealing
with issues of varying conditions which Safety and Security personnel are expected to encounter with success,
maintaining at the same time the cohesive framework of the SETOFF Project. The findings of the present
study/research are expected to provide valuable guidance for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners,
establishing a sustainable and resilient operating frame in natural disaster training for the future.
Key-Words: - Environmental emergencies, natural disasters, resilience, training, needs analysis, Civil Protection
Personnel.
Received: August 15, 2023. Revised: May 24, 2024. Accepted: June 26, 2024. Published: July 26, 2024.
1 Introduction
The responsibilities of those involved in Safety and
Security within Civil Protection and the private
sector have evolved significantly. This evolution
demands continuous improvements in training
methodologies and content to keep up with the
changing landscape. The SETOFF Project (Smart
Education and Training Program For central and
local Government servants: Embrace vulnerability as
our greatest strength and innovative tools For risk
management title, No 2021-1-EL-KA220-VET-
000033026) aims to boost disaster prevention,
preparation, and response systems enhancing
preparedness and occupational safety for civil
protection personnel, as well as individuals in public
and private sectors responsible for Safety and
Security during crises and national disasters. The
project plans to create an innovative e-training
program based on a proven simulation model and the
latest scientific knowledge. This program addresses
specific skill gaps identified through extensive
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
397
Volume 20, 2024
analyses across partner countries. Various
cases/findings stress the need for such initiatives.
They point out deficiencies and limitations in
understanding the nature and mechanisms of natural
and man-made disasters, inefficient assessment of the
evolving dynamics, deficit with respect to training
tactics, and limited access to actual disaster
management drills. Therefore, an in-depth training
needs analysis was conducted across partner
countries during the project’s initial phase. The goal
is to understand participants' profiles, task
requirements, and areas for skill development and
improvement. Despite the fact that SETOFF Project
encompasses a comprehensive needs analysis across
the four partner countries, the present paper zeroes on
Greece, enlightens the trainees, researchers,
policymakers, first responders, end-users, etc., on the
unique demanding conditions, and «grey» areas
within Safety and Security resilience (flexibility).
Focusing firmly on Greece’s demands and case
studies offers a vital component, forming the
structure of the SETOFF e-training program. By
inspecting the specific differences either of minor or
major importance within Greece’s civil protection
landscape, the present paper aims to stress the
importance of fitting the e-training content within the
above-mentioned unique requirements. The findings
of the work outlined in this paper reveal valuable
insights into Greece’s particular training demands
and additionally play a pivotal role in developing a
transversal training program that considers diverse
needs across partner countries allowing at the same
time an adaptive training for various categories of
personnel involved in Safety and Security operations
according to their profile and demands.
The insights derived from the analysis pertained
to Greece’s case provide a detailed canvas of the
country’s distinct challenges and also serve as a
guiding compass in developing an e-training program
that includes and addresses specialized needs. The
transversal approach seeks to provide adaptive and
comprehensive training content that effectively
addresses the diverse needs of Safety and Security
personnel and at the same time maintains a cohesive
framework that that aligns with the overall goals of
the SETOFF Project.
2 Problem Formulation
Man-made or natural disasters can cause severe
damage to individuals, communities, economies,
supply chains, and the environment. Moreover, they
may trigger secondary disasters, aggravating initial
impacts. Such type incidents in the previous decades,
clearly illustrate the urgent need to tackle these
hazards within the overall frame of inclusive disaster
risk management. Furthermore, the cost of disasters
worldwide has risen from previous years and
continues to grow due to increasing disaster risk as a
result of factors such as climate crisis, rapid
urbanization, and industrialization. SETOFF Project
will contribute to improving the management of these
risks and strengthening resilience. The objective of
this effort is to offer a targeted set of both scientific
and practical activities for implementation at national
and local levels contribution and to support training
and capacity building and to raise awareness of the
risks and impacts of man-made and natural disasters.
Civil Protection Personnel face important challenges
due to the complexity and incidents’ increased
demands, while private sector Safety and Security
Personnel face relatively same challenges in
protecting the indoor estate. Under these
circumstances, both Civil Protection and private
sector personnel need to be able to evaluate critical
issues under complex conditions and make quick and
reasonable judgments based on sound scientific
knowledge and former experience in order to reduce
possibly occurring errors. Therefore, it is important to
provide more and diverse training and seek new and
improved ways to train target groups that optimize
the actual task performance, while minimizing
physical danger and financial cost.
The overarching goals of the SETOFF Project
include a sophisticated approach to enhance
preparedness and actionability when conducting
Safety and Security operations. These goals aim to
provide private sector and civil protection personnel
with top-class training to support readiness for crises
and disasters. In order to achieve goals an exhaustive
strategy was developed comprising several key
components. Above all the project seeks to identify
existing gaps concerning both knowledge and
performance based on meticulous needs assessments.
The aforementioned assessments were conducted in
Greece, the Republic of Northern Macedonia,
Belgium, and Spain. The assessments are mandatory
for pinpointing the deficiencies in current practices.
Based on the insights obtained from the assessments,
the project aimed to develop a unified e-training
curriculum. This curriculum is formed by the
findings of simulation exercises and it is designed to
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
398
Volume 20, 2024
specifically address the identified knowledge and
relevant performance gaps. The curriculum is
accessible via an e-platform so as to be rendered
available on portable devices encouraging a
community of learners to enhance skills in Safety and
Security management. In addition, the project
imposed a significant emphasis (emphasized) on
collaboration and resource optimization.
To facilitate trainees’ needs, the SETOFF project
aims to flexible training in a familiar and reliable
environment, without needing excessive resources.
Therefore, the e-platform was based on Google’s
Moodle platform. No extra security, bandwidth, or
reliability issues were assessed as critical to devote
further resources. SETOFF project aims to advance
the training of a wide range of first responders from
various countries. It does not aim to exchange critical
information in real-time in remote or disaster-prone
areas. Therefore, its resources were focused on
identifying the training needs and developing
competent material, rather than on high-end
technologies in telecommunications.
Therefore, the mainstream platform (Google’s
Moodle) was used. Issues of bandwidth and
reliability were tested in the pilot application without
any important findings. Regarding the security
measures taken for personal information, the
platform uses https protocol, which is used for secure
and encrypted communication. The use of Wireless
networks, especially public ones, is always a security
factor that can lead to information leaks (personal
and/or company data), which is beyond the control of
the project and the responsibility lies with the
institutions applying the training. Being security-
critical organizations, they are all aware of these
issues and have certain policies.
The knowledge base (fundamental knowledge) is
enriched through the creation and improvement of
simulation scenarios developed by professionals from
different countries. Moreover, resource availability
problems and challenges were compensated by
sharing existing installations, and on-site and
distance learning approaches. A crucial aspect of the
project’s strategy involved the utilization and further
mainstreaming of successfully developed training
models. Maximizing the benefits of these models the
project aimed to validate field-acquired practices and
thus support professionals with respect to their
endeavors. In alignment with these overarching
objectives, an in-depth assessment and analysis of
training needs were meticulously conducted.
This assessment was used as a fundamental
element in forming the subsequent training program,
ensuring that it was fit to address the specific
requirements and challenges identified across the
participating countries and sectors involved in Safety
and Security operations. The exhaustive analysis
includes three phases, involving quantitative data
collection, literature review, and detailed qualitative
analysis. Target audience analysis was also
undertaken to align educational material with
individual learner requirements.
2.1 Needs Analysis Conduct
To this purpose, a training needs analysis was
performed during the first six months of the project,
in three phases, the first targeting quantitative data
coupled with literature research and review, and the
third using qualitative data that finetuned particular
aspects of the findings. A target audience and data
collection analysis has also been conducted, since the
design and delivery of educational material would be
influenced by key characteristics of the learners and
their individual requirements, among others, the
identification and classification of the training
content.
2.1.1 Literature Review
The bibliographic research was carried out by setting
the research questions related to the thematic areas
and modules that should be included in the training
program, the content of each module, the
particularities to take into account in order to cover
the various training needs, such as different
beneficiaries in terms of skills, knowledge,
operational input, etc., distance learning methodology
parameters and official recognition through the
European Credit System for Vocational Education
and Training (ECVET system).
Priority was given to the study of research
reports from European and international
organizations such as the European Union (EU),
United Nations (UN), International Labour
Organization (ILO), World Health Organization
(WHO), European Agency for Health and Safety at
Work (EuOSHA), as well as relevant reports from the
relevant authorities of America, Australia, etc.
Scientific databases such as Scopus were
searched to find articles published after 2012 in
scientific journals and conference proceedings. Also,
research was carried out on websites of European,
international, and national organizations that contain
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
399
Volume 20, 2024
information for training programs in the field of civil
protection.
Natural and man-made disasters can have very
serious effects on the lives and health of citizens, the
economy, and the environment. Today’s hazards such
as biological, environmental, geological, hydro-
meteorological, and technological processes and
phenomena (as mentioned in the Sendai Framework
for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030) pose a major
threat to humans and the environment, [1]. New risks
should be also taken into consideration such as war
and threats created by new technologies (e.g. CBRN,
cyber, hybrid), [2]. New difficulties due to the use of
new equipment are also mentioned in the literature
(e.g. difficulties in extinguishing fires in electric
vehicles due to lithium batteries), especially if we
take into account the interactions between risk factors
has been emphasized by introducing the concept of
“multi-hazard”.
In relation to strengthening resilience against
natural and technological disasters and other threats,
the need to invest in systems and infrastructures
clearly emerges.
The importance of training for civil protection
personnel and first responders for disaster risk
reduction in relation to natural or man-made origin
disasters is underlined by a number of studies and
reports, [3], [4], [5]. However, the weaknesses that
still exist at the level of training and the large
differences between countries are pointed out [4], [6],
[7], [8].
In the event of major emergencies, the European
Civil Protection Mechanism was established in 2001
to aid in the mobilization of emergency assistance
from Participating States, [9]. In order to improve
disaster response, preparedness, and prevention by
enhancing the expertise of the experts involved and
ensuring compatibility and complementarity between
intervention teams and other intervention support, a
training program has been established for civil
protection and emergency management personnel.
A key aspect that emerged from the qualitative field
research in our project is the need to train those
involved in civil protection on issues related to the
protection of their health and safety, and in particular
on aspects related to occupational risk assessment,
personal protective equipment, medical examinations
for health protection, etc. This is a very important
issue as those involved in civil protection face serious
risks to their health and safety leading to accidents
and occupational diseases.
For the integrated construction of the training
program that takes into account the particularities of
each country and its special needs, research was
carried out in bibliographic sources on civil
protection priorities and on relevant training
programs and awareness-raising actions in the 4
countries participating in the project (Greece,
Belgium, Spain, North Macedonia).
Especially in Greece, due to past disasters,
special emphasis is placed on wildfires (e.g.
Peloponnese in 2007, Mati in Attica region in 2018,
Evia in 2021), floods (e.g. central and Evros region in
2015, Mandra region of Attica in 2017) and
earthquakes, given that there have been several
catastrophic earthquakes in the past.
2.1.2 Needs Assessment - Quantitative Phase
The quantitative phase collected and recorded data
via an online survey, obtaining relevant responses
from 511 participants across the participant countries.
Subsequent qualitative research is oriented to explore
critical factors impacting disaster management,
including service protocols, personnel characteristics,
and diverse disaster environments. The quantitative
phase involved in-depth Focus Group interviews in
each country, engaging 45 participants in 8 sessions
(2 per country, representing public and private
sectors). Additionally, a thorough examination of best
practices applied to the EU and other countries
investigated the impact of training simulations on
effectiveness and adaptability concerning disaster
situations. The generated robust datasets guided the
design of training modules, both in content and
methodology.
In order to conduct a field study investigating the
training needs, an anonymous online instrument was
established, taking into account the objectives of the
SETOFF project, the results of the qualitative field
research carried out through interviews with
stakeholders, and the research tools mentioned in the
literature, [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17],
[18], [19], [20].
The instrument was initially in English, then it
was translated by native speakers into four languages
(Greek, Spanish, French, and North Macedonian),
and then again it was translated into English to
achieve its validation per language. The outcomes we
recollected online in Greece, Belgium, Spain, and
North Macedonia from June to August 2022.
Recipients of the instruments were employees in
various services and organizations related to civil
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
400
Volume 20, 2024
protection, such as Civil protection organizations
(municipality, regional unity, central government),
Fire service, Police, Emergency medical service,
Coast guard, Security service, as well as individuals
with Safety Engineer duties, trainers in training
programs, civil protection experts, volunteers, etc.
The instrument was distributed to more than 100
recipients per participating country using a snowball
sampling method [21] due to convenience. Thus, the
data collected constitute a quasi-sample mainly
representing a random sample in time and not a
representative sample to achieve generalization of the
outcomes. The response rate varied greatly by
country. To use the research tool, all the terms related
to the protection of personal data complied with the
legislation. Statistical tests were performed on the
"sample". The confidence level was a=0.05.
The quantitative training needs study was carried
out based on the following pivotal axes:
Firstly, the survey seeks insights on the thematic
modules vital for inclusion in the training program
and the specific content necessary within each
module to adequately fulfill fundamental training
needs. Additionally, it explores the optimal duration
for each training module, aiming to strike a balance
between depth of learning and practicality.
Moreover, the survey examines the necessary
particularities for customizing the program to meet
diverse training needs and in the end to take into
account the differences among end users and the
variations of the specific requirements bound to each
country. In accordance with modern evolving
educational methodologies, the survey pursues the
identification of the most suitable methods, tools, and
best practices for distance learning. Simultaneously,
the survey examines the primary challenges
pertaining to distance learning implementation and
strategies to overcome these obstacles effectively.
Lastly, the survey deals with the crucial issue of
certification. It examines various methods to ensure
validation and certification of the obtained
knowledge providing evidence about the skills gained
through the training program.
2.1.3 Needs Assessment - Qualitative Phase
Moreover, aiming for a better investigation of the
needs, qualitative research was conducted by
interviewing the potential beneficiaries of the project
in the 4 countries. Particularly, in each country, 2
Focus Groups were created, based on the division
between private sector and public sector employees.
The aim was to use a participatory-based approach to
investigate and describe the needs of target groups
(first focus group), as well as online learning best
practices, barriers, and recommendations to
overcome them (second focus group). Participants
included relevant stakeholders and academic faculty
from the participating institutions.
A tailored Focus Groupe Guide was created to
facilitate data collection, aspiring to help understand
the critical factors that affect disaster management
such as service organization and procedures,
personnel characteristics (skills, experience,
demographics, etc.), as well as disaster environments
(different type, complexity, etc.).
The interviews were conducted according to the
following principles:
A. Voluntary Participation
Individuals agreed to participate in the research of
their own free will. It was essential for participants to
understand that their participation was voluntary and
that there would be no consequences for refusing to
take part in the study or to answer specific questions.
Researchers explained the nature of the study openly
and honestly and in a way that was understandable to
the participants. The researchers ensured that the
participants understood the nature of the research, its
purposes, the potential risks and benefits to the
participation, and the fact that they could withdraw
from participation at any time. It was made sure that
there was adequate time to answer any questions that
an individual might have before and during the focus
group.
B. Confidentiality
Researchers agreed to keep any personal information
that has been revealed to them confidential. This
means that no specific contents were shared with
anyone except another researcher on the project, nor
any that would allow another researcher or outsider
to know who participated in the study. Researchers
clearly explained how confidentiality would be
protected. No information would be publicly reported
that would identify them as a participant in the study.
C. Respect for People's Rights, Dignity, and Diversity
It has been made sure that researchers and their work
respected the rights, dignity, and worth of all people,
without any discrimination based on gender, religion,
or culture. Through the focus group interviews,
researchers were respectful of the rights of others to
hold values, attitudes, and opinions that differed from
their own.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
401
Volume 20, 2024
3 Needs Analysis Results Focus on
Greece
The survey included participants mostly in their late
40s, with a slightly higher percentage representation
of males. There was a significant participation of
individuals with advanced educational profiles and
remarkable experience, particularly from the public
sector. The distribution of participants with degrees
pertained to civil protection was relatively balanced,
providing diverse perspectives with the survey data.
Table 1 shows the summary statistics of the
demographics.
Table 1. Demographic information about Greece’s
participants (n=347)
Demographics
Percentage
Gender
Female
40.7%
Male
59.3%
Educational level
Master's Degree
53.6%
PhD
3.8%
Working position
Permanent in the Public Sector
50.3%
Contract in Public Sector
7.5%
Self-Employed
20.3%
Private Sector Employment
12.5%
Work experience
Over 10 Years
51.9%
5-10 Years
19.2%
Relevant University Degree
Yes
44.2%
No
47.3%
The increased representation of women in roles
related to civil protection denotes a welcoming and
more inclusive environment promoting gender
equality as well as bringing to light diverse
perspectives, skills, and expertise to the sector. The
observed gender distribution in the civil protection
sector, compared to a higher representation of males
historically, reflects a positive shift towards greater
inclusivity and diversity. The increased percentage of
women represented in the survey indicates that the
civil protection working environment tends towards
more inclusive working practices, promoting gender
equality and welcoming new, diverse perspectives,
skills, and expertise. Compared to the historical male
dominance in the sector, the current increase in
female participation, here denoted by 40.7% of the
participants, anticipates an even greater diversity and
inclusivity.
The high educational qualifications that emerge
from the survey suggest a trend among the
participants, that can be linked to an important
engagement in e-training programs within their
respective centers of interest (Figure 1). Their
academic credentials result in important skills and
competences relating to the need for training to the
use of digital resources. The high educational
background suggests that these individuals not only
reveal skills of adaptability and comfort in using and
interacting with digital resources and content present
in e-training educational materials but also indicate a
significant ease in navigating through autonomous
learning environments and successfully achieving the
courses.
Fig. 1: Formerly attended training programs
Another element that the survey revealed refers to
the number of public sector employees with
significant -over a decade- work experience, who are
still eager to participate in training programs. The
stated keenness resonates with a dedication to the
civil protection principles and commitment to lifelong
learning, especially in a sector that is subject to
continuous updating in terms of skills, materials,
techniques, and above all, readiness and
preparedness. Moreover, the fact that even seasoned
professionals affirm their zeal for continuous
education, speaks highly of their dedication to
service.
The Greek participants focus on training areas
"First aid," "Risk assessment and management,"
"Occupational health and safety," "Earthquakes,"
"Fires," and "Emergency plans", a trend that is fully
aligned with the challenges the country faces in terms
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
402
Volume 20, 2024
of manmade or natural disasters and consequently
reflect the main areas that training should address in
order to provide continuous skill development that
will strengthen preparedness and resilience. Meeting
and responding to the constantly changing needs in
the field of disaster management training is one of the
core goals of the SETOFF Project. The
interdisciplinary approach adopted while creating the
e-training resulted in the creation of adaptable,
inclusive, personalized training paths that aspire to
address the identified gaps in previous training. Thus,
the comprehensive training framework established
not only addresses the diverse needs of Safety and
Security personnel but also reinforces the countrys
preparedness and resilience against a wide range of
natural disasters.
The survey also reveals low percentages of
ECVET credits acquisition across various training
areas, despite the extended offer in training
initiatives. This deficit reflects the lack of
implementing VET policy within civil protection
training initiatives (Table 2). The SETOFF training
recognizes this need and aims to provide a horizontal,
customized training experience tailored to various
trainee needs and profiles. Accrediting recognition of
their efforts to keep pace with the everchanging needs
and challenges of disaster management reflects the
importance of lifelong learning and validates the
perseverance of the personnel.
Table 2. Training Participation and ECVET
Reception Among Participants (N = 347)
Training Areas
ECVET (%)
Risk Assessment/Management
3.7
Risk Communication
1.7
Emergency Planning
2.3
First Aid
2.9
Rescue
1.4
Fires
2.9
Earthquakes
2.3
Storms
2.9
Floods
2.3
Pandemics
1.2
Technological Accidents
2.3
Health and Safety
2.0
This approach facilitates trainees in
acknowledging and validating their acquired
knowledge, skills, and competencies in civil
protection within the established ECVET framework.
The certification offered by the SETOFF training
program enables trainees to gain formal recognition,
enhancing their mobility across borders, fostering
professional growth, and contributing to the
standardization and acknowledgment of training
within the civil protection field.
The survey participants reported the degree of
their skills in a list of tasks according to a Likert scale
of 1: No skill to 4: Fully skilled no/very little
improvement required and 5 was reported as it is not
applicable to my job.
Fig. 2: Degree of skills in relation to tasks
The highest skills degree was reported for “risk
assessment and management” and “occupational
safety and health” followed by “risk communication”
and “emergency plan”. Fires and earthquakes
constitute a popular educational topic among the
participants from Greece (Figure 2).
The preferences regarding the ideal duration of
training courses across various areas within the civil
protection domain reflect the perceived importance
and complexity of each topic. The participants chose
the optimal duration from 1 to more than three hours
of attendance. There appears to be an important
inclination toward longer-duration courses in crucial
areas such as emergency planning, risk assessment,
occupational safety and health rescue, disaster
recovery, and first aid. A considerable percentage of
respondents indicate the desire for in-depth training
(more than 3 hours), emphasizing the comprehensive
understanding required in these critical domains. This
inclination aligns with the areas where a larger
number of individuals have undergone training,
highlighting a potential correlation between
perceived importance and prior training experiences
(Figure 3).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
403
Volume 20, 2024
Fig. 3: Optimal duration of an online training
program
Correlation has been performed and has been
tested for its significance. In order to investigate the
association of duration reported due to skills and
attendance. Thus, conversely, for subjects like risk
communication, earthquakes, floods, and storms,
while there's a preference for longer courses, a
significant proportion also indicates the suitability of
shorter-duration training sessions. The variation
might reflect the diverse nature of these topics and
differing levels of prior training experiences among
respondents. As a matter of fact, there is a negative
correlation among duration and attendance (r=-0.557,
p<0.001 as well as among duration and prior skills
(r=-0.548, p<0.01).
These data present a dual focus: the importance
of providing extensive training in fundamental areas
where participants demand a desire for longer
courses, and the need for adaptive training formats
for subjects where participants demonstrate mixed
preferences with respect to training duration. Such
perceptions stress the significance of tailoring
training programs to accommodate varying
preferences while ensuring comprehensive coverage
of critical topics within civil protection.
In the course of the focus group interviews
conducted, several crucial areas were investigated,
shedding light on crucial issues relevant to disaster
management and resilience training. The Focus
Group Interviews provided a structured framework of
five key area questions that allowed us to collect
insights from the participants and thus facilitate
profound understanding:
Key Area Question 1 - Current Work Status and
Training Background: Participants were encouraged
to describe their current professional profile in
relation to their former studies or training. The aim of
this key area question was to confirm the results of
the survey regarding the relevance and applicability
of their educational background to their current status
and responsibilities in terms of health, protection, and
safety in the work environment.
Key Area Question 2 - Experiences: Participants
were asked to share experiences that were successful
and others that were challenging and focus on the
significant role of training, or lack of it, in the
outcomes of these experiences. The aim of this key
area of questions was to link the statements to the
survey results and confirm the importance of
providing tailored made and individualized learning
paths through the e-training.
Key Area Question 3 - Curriculum Content
Preferences: The list of thematic areas related to
disaster risk and resilience training that was
presented in the survey was given to the focus Group
participants. They were then asked to prioritize these
areas on the basis of their perceived needs for further
delving. The aim of the key area question 3 was to
validate the training priorities that emerged from the
survey and possibly incorporate accompanying
elements, as well as to understand the stated
preferences in regard to the allocated duration of each
thematic area.
Key Area Question 4 - Tabletop Exercises (TTex)
and Simulations: Participants were provided a list of
additional tabletop exercises and simulations and
were asked to further one of them. Additionally, they
were invited to propose specific scenarios based on
their experiences and needs. The aim of this key area
question was to retrieve participants’ input and thus
contribute to the design and the improvement of
training simulations offered throughout the e-
training.
Key Area Question 5 - Platform Contents:
Participants were invited to suggest two specific
contents they wished to see included in the tools
section of the e-training platform. This question
aimed to identify and gather suggestions for the
desired supplementary resources or materials that
would be incorporated, as a collective effort and
would improve the learning experience and outcome
of the training, such as regulations, links to
guidelines, international directives, or other pertinent
tools.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
404
Volume 20, 2024
Table 3. Focus Groups interviews insights
Key
Areas
Public Sector
Participants
Private Sector
Participants
Participant
Demograp
hics
9 males and 2 females,
average age of 48, roles
in civil protection and
administrative
departments
2 males and 2 females,
average age of 50, roles in
safety, disaster
management, security, and
voluntary work
Experiences &
Training
Successful experience
in handling weather
events, blackouts,
floods, and forest fires.
Lacked training in
unsuccessful snowfall
management.
Managed forest fires, and
utilized fire protection
systems effectively. Lacked
training in incidents
involving electrocution
during flooding.
Course Content
Preferences
A strong penchant for
risk-related areas: risk
communication,
management processes,
perception, weather,
industrial accidents, and
first responders' health
and safety. Emphasis on
role identification in
incidents.
Emphasized comprehensive
training in risk areas:
introduction, management
processes, perception,
communication, health and
safety, industrial accidents,
fire, security, weather, and
epidemics.
Thematic Area
Preferences for
Simulations
Desired simulations
focused on risk
communication,
volcanos, industrial
accidents, fire, and
weather phenomena.
Emphasized multi-
hazard scenarios'
importance.
Echoed preferences for
simulations in risk areas,
including introduction,
management processes,
perception, communication,
health and safety, industrial
accidents, fire, security,
weather, and epidemics.
Project
Platform
Content
Requests
Requested exercise
videos, a repository of
good practices,
predictive models,
regulations/guidelines,
and distance learning
tools.
Desired training content on
industrial accidents,
occupational health and
safety, flood management,
and prevention strategies.
Other Insights
Underlined challenging
points such as
understaffing, lack of
training, and ineffective
emergency
mechanisms. Stressed
the need for additional
resources like drivers,
weather stations, and
voluntary sector
involvement.
Shared experiences of
effectively managing forest
fires and employing fire
protection systems.
Highlighted the need for
training in handling
electrocution incidents
during flooding.
Providing a structured approach to the Focus
Group Interviews through these 5 key areas allowed a
detailed exploration of the participants’ experiences,
preferences, and requirements concerning disaster,
risk, and resilience, as well as to investigate their
experiences, preferences, and needs in regards to
training in these areas.
Table 3 presents the key insights that were
gathered from participants belonging in the two
sectors (public and private). It gives specific
information in a comparative perspective about the
demographics, the experiences and training needs of
the participants, as well as their preferences when it
comes to simulation or the desired project platform
contents, and any additional perceptions the
participants related to challenges and resource
requirements.
Participants from both private and public sectors
pointed out how important inclusive training can be
as it can correspond to various risk areas, as well as it
can cover effective communication strategies
throughout emergency cases. Participants highlighted
the understaffing and lack of training among other
challenges, and concluded to the need for immediate
improvements in training programs. They also noted
the need to allocate resources in order to reinforce
emergency response strategies in both sectors as part
of the ever-updating training components. As of
public sector participants, they insisted on the need to
further focus on training areas such as risk
communication, risk management, and weather-
related disaster scenarios. Lastly, the participants
emphasized the need for transversal and tailored
training, such as the SETOFF.
Correspondingly, private sector participants also
convey the need for specialized training, that covers
various areas including risk introduction, health and
safety, and epidemic management. Their input
reflects the findings of the survey in that they
highlight mismatches between training expectations
and actual needs.
Overall, the focus Group Interviews highlighted
the importance of constant training updates in order
to adapt to the evolving challenges posed by natural
disasters within the fields of safety and security. They
also highlight the various challenges that the
personnel of the public and private sector face,
including restricted resources, limited training
opportunities, and deficiencies in skills and
knowledge, with emphasis on the need for innovative
training, like the SETOFF. The focus group
interviews ultimately propose additional valuable
guidance in shaping a more effective, responsive and
individualized training program.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
405
Volume 20, 2024
The SETOFF training proposes a transversal
approach in accordance with the identified needs of
Civil Protection, Safety, and Security personnel.
While seeking to cover skill gaps, as well as to adapt
training content to personalized needs, it maintains a
consistent framework that aligns with the project's
goal of providing adaptable and comprehensive
training. These findings are essential for developing a
resilient, updated, and sustainable training landscape
for natural disasters, from which policymakers,
researchers, and practitioners alike can largely
benefit.
4 Conclusions
The preliminary results derived from the SETOFF
program so far proved to have a significant impact in
developing a reliable training platform for a
successful confrontation of manmade and natural
disasters, based on a suitable selection of the
personnel involved. First, a survey was conducted in
four countries in order to reveal and demonstrate
practices that are applied to human or natural disaster
confrontation depending on the gained experience so
far and the educational or other background of the
personnel involved. The survey took into account
individuals from both the public and private sectors.
Then, a study followed revealing common points and
diversities that can lead to a safe design and
development of an adaptive methodology and e-
learning platform, maximizing in this way, the
engagement in knowledge and ensuring at the same
time the successful involvement of the relevant
personnel. By addressing these identified needs and
divergences through a transversal training approach,
the SETOFF project establishes a training program
that not only meets the specific demands of safety
and security personnel but also contributes to a
resilient and effective disaster management
landscape.
There is still an ongoing effort for further
improvement and in the future, upon the completion
of the program, more detailed and extensive results
will be presented, including comparative results from
the needs analysis and the trainees’ final assessment,
in order to check if the initial needs were met. Also,
as the SETOFF training is developed in five
languages and available to users at an international
level, qualitative analysis will be applied of various
factors and indicators concerning the differences in
training from the multilingual and multicultural
perspectives.
References:
[1] UNDRR. Sendai framework for disaster risk
reduction 2015 2030. United Nations Office
for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), 2015,
[Online].
https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-
framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
(Accessed Date: February 2, 2024).
[2] European Commission. 7th European Civil
Protection Forum 2022, Final
Report. Brussels, Belgium, 2022, [Online].
https://civil-protection-humanitarian-
aid.ec.europa.eu/partnerships/civil-protection-
partners/7th-european-civil-protection-
forum_en (Accessed Date: June 3, 2024).
[3] Casajus Valles, A., Marin Ferrer, M.,
Poljanšek, K., Clark, I. (eds.). Science for
disaster risk management 2020: acting today,
protecting tomorrow. Publications Office of the
European Union, 2020. DOI: 10.2760/571085.
[4] Bonelli, M.d.G., Damacena, F., Silveira Viana,
A., Gambardella, A.D., Marchezini, V.
Challenges for professionalism in civil defense
and protection. Disaster Prevention and
Management, 31(5), 2022, pp. 565-580. DOI:
10.1108/DPM-03-2022-0057.
[5] European Commission. Evaluation of the
European Commission's civil protection
prevention and preparedness projects (2014-
2020). Final report. Publications Office of the
European Union, 2021,
[Online]. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2795/01
355 (Accessed Date: February 2, 2024).
[6] Khorram-Manesh, A., Ashkenazi, M., Djalali,
A., Ingrassia, P.L., Friedl, T., Von Armin, G.,
Lupesco, O., Kaptan, K., Arculeo, C.,
Hreckovski, B., Komadina, R., Fisher, P.,
Voigt, S., James, J., Gursky, E. Education in
disaster management and emergencies:
defining a new European course. Disaster
Medicine and Public Health Preparedness,
9(3), 2015, pp. 245-255. DOI:
10.1017/dmp.2015.9.
[7] Koler, A., Ortner, S., Peters, M. Qualities and
fields of action of destination resilience: an
indicator analysis process. In: Destination
Resilience: challenges and opportunities for
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
406
Volume 20, 2024
destination management and governance,
Routledge, 2018, pp. 98-110.
[8] Al-Shamsi, M., Moitinho De Almeida, M.,
Nyanchoka, L., Guha-Sapir, D., Jennes, S.,
Assessment of the capacity and capability of
burn centers to respond to burn disasters in
Belgium: a mixed-method study. Journal of
Burn Care and Research, 40(6), 2019, pp. 869-
877. DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irz105.
[9] European Commission. The European civil
protection training programme. Publications
Office of the European Union, 2012,
[Online]. https://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/media/
publications/european_civil_protection_trainin
g_programme_en.pdf (Accessed Date:
February 2, 2024).
[10] Davis, A.L., Allen, J., Shepler, L., Resick, C.,
Lee, J., Marinucci, R., Taylor, J.A. Moving
FOCUS The Fire Service Organizational
Culture of Safety survey From research to
practice. Journal of Safety Research, 74, 2020,
pp. 233-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.011.
[11] Rose, C., Seater, R., Norige, A. Analysis of
decision making skills for large scale disaster
response. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Global
Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC
2015), Seattle, WA, USA, 2015, pp. 240-247.
DOI: 10.1109/GHTC.2015.7343979.
[12] Plotnick, L., Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R., Yang, L.,
Bañuls, V.A. Curriculum guidelines for
master's level programs in Information Systems
for Emergency Management. Proceedings of
the International ISCRAM Conference, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, 2016.
[13] Fernandez, A.R., Studnek, J.R., Margolis, G.S.,
Mac Crawford, J., Bentley, M.A., Marcozzi, D.
Disaster preparedness of nationally certified
emergency medical services
professionals. Academic Emergency Medicine,
18(4), 2011, pp. 403-412.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01030.x.
[14] Broach, J., Smith, M.E. Emergency
preparedness training preferences and
perceived barriers to training among various
healthcare providers and public health
practitioners in Massachusetts. American
Journal of Disaster Medicine, 12(2), 2017, pp.
85-106.
[15] Sharma, M., Netherton, A., McLarty K.,
Petrokofsky C., Chang M. Professional
workforce training needs for health impact
assessment in spatial planning: a cross-
sectional survey. Public Health in Practice, 3,
2022,100268.
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100268.
[16] Reese S.M. Journal club: a pilot gap analysis
survey of US emergency medical services
practitioners to determine training and
education needs pertaining to highly infectious
disease preparedness and response. American
Journal of Infection Control, 46(3), 2018, pp.
356-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.11.029.
[17] Skryabina, E.A., Betts, N., Reedy, G., Riley,
P., Amlôt, R. The role of emergency
preparedness exercises in the response to a
mass casualty terrorist incident: a mixed
methods study. International Journal of
Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR), 46, 2020,
101503. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101503.
[18] Gunay, E., Ersel, M., Yax, J.A., Sheele, J.M.,
Karakurt, G., Acar, K., Frank, S.H. Disaster
training needs and expectations among Turkish
emergency medicine physicians - A national
survey. Disaster Medicine and Public Health
Preparedness, 14(2), 2020, pp. 229-235.
DOI:10.1017/dmp.2019.50.
[19] Deitchman, S. Enhancing crisis leadership in
public health emergencies. Disaster Medicine
and Public Health Preparedness, 7(5), 2013,
pp. 534-540. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2013.81.
[20] Mortelmans, L.J.M., Lievers, J., Dieltiens, G.,
Sabbe, M.B. Are Belgian military students in
medical sciences better educated in disaster
medicine than their civilian
colleagues? Journal of the Royal Army Medical
Corps, 162(5), 2016, pp. 383-386. DOI:
10.1136/jramc-2015-000563.
[21] Leighton, K., Kardong-Edgren, S.,
Schneidereith, T., & Foisy-Doll, C. Using
social media and snowball sampling as an
alternative recruitment strategy for
research. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 55,
2021, pp. 37-42. DOI:
10.1016/j.ecns.2021.03.006.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
407
Volume 20, 2024
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
Michail Chalaris was responsible for the supervision.
The authors equally contributed to the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
ERASMUS KA220-VET Cooperation partnerships
in vocational education and training, ERASMUS
KA220, Grant Agreement No.: 2021-1-EL-KA220-
VET-000033026.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_
US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.37
Michail Chalaris, Maria Roussi, Dimitra Pinotsi,
Paraskevi Georgiadou, Antonis Targoutzidis
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
408
Volume 20, 2024