How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect Corporate Cash Holdings
Determinants? An Applied Study on Saudi Arabia Firms
DABBOUSSI MOEZ1, BADRELDIN MOHAMED AHMED ABDULRAHMAN2
1Department of Finance and Investment,
College of Business, Jouf University,
SAUDI ARABIA
2Department of Business Administration,
College of Business, Jouf University,
SAUDI ARABIA
1ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7325-2108
2ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-1150
Abstract: - The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced substantial uncertainty and economic disruptions, prompting
numerous firms to increase their cash reserves as a significant advantage to enable effective management of
exogenous shocks. Using a sample of 120 non-financial firms listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange between 2012
and 2022, we examine the determinants of cash holdings. By dividing the sample into two sub-periods: pre-Covid
and under Covid and applying the panel data approach, the results show a significant difference between the
determinants of cash holdings of the two groups of firms. During the COVID-19 pandemic, cash holding has
increased with firm size, cash flow, Cost of Capital, and net working capital, while it has decreased with dividend
payment, and return on invested capital. The research provides support for the pecking order theory, indicating that
Saudi firms have maintained relatively stable cash management policies and remained unaffected throughout the
pandemic. This study sheds light on the supportive role of the Saudi government in assisting firms facing liquidity
challenges, offering a comprehensive understanding of the subject. Furthermore, it contributes to the existing
literature on corporate finance by exploring new factors that drive cash management decisions.
Key-Words: - Cash holdings Determinant, COVID-19 pandemic, Saudi listed firms, Firm Size, Dividend Payments,
Capital Expenditure, Networking Capital, Cash Flow Ratio, Return on Invested Capital, Cost of
Capital.
Received: June 17, 2023. Revised: March 9, 2024. Accepted: April 13, 2024. Published: May 16, 2024.
1 Introduction
The continuous growth in corporate cash reserves
worldwide has generated a growing interest among
researchers and scholars, [1], [2], [3], focusing on the
need to study and understand the dynamics of
corporate cash holdings. This part of financial assets
held by the firm as cash or near-cash instruments are
easily convertible into cash without incurring
significant losses. These holdings are documented as
a separate line item on the firm's current assets,
reflecting the amount of readily available cash
resources.
The existing literature on cash holdings has
identified several motives behind firms' decisions to
hold cash, including precautionary [4], speculative,
transaction [5], agency [6] and tax motives [7].
However, policymakers and researchers are still
exploring the exact reasons for the increase in cash
reserves observed globally and particularly in the
aftermath of the major crises that have shaped the
world like the Global Financial Crisis (2007-2008)
and, recently, the unexpected shocks caused by the
Covid-19 crisis. This pandemic has exerted a
significant influence on firms' cash holdings
strategies.
Few studies have attempted to clarify the
relationship between Covid-19 and cash holdings.
For example, [8], argues that the corporate cash
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
173
Volume 20, 2024
management was not influenced by the Covid-19
pandemic in Korea. Similarly, [9], reports a negative
relationship between firms’ Covid exposure and cash
holding. Using 3,924 Chinese firms, the authors
show that this negative correlation is observed in
firms that experience high financial frictions and lack
a diversification strategy.
The present study concentrates on Saudi Arabian
firms considering the crucial role that cash holdings
play in providing financial stability, flexibility, and
the ability to meet short-term obligations. Due to the
precautionary measures linked to the Covid-19,
Saudi-listed firms experienced a decrease in their
revenues as well as their investments, [10]. As a
result, the Saudi government has undertaken various
decisions that are designed to provide a favorable
environment for Saudi firms to manage their cash
positions effectively. Therefore, it is crucial to
examine the determinants that influence firms'
decisions regarding cash holdings in response to the
specific measures and initiatives implemented during
the Pandemic.
This study contributes to the extant literature in
two ways. First, we advance our knowledge
regarding the motives behind firms' decisions to hold
cash during the Pandemic period. Second, we
introduce new determinants of corporate cash
holding that can better explain the strategies adopted
by Saudi firms to prioritize cash management at the
boardroom level.
Following this structure, we aim to present a
coherent and logical progression of information. In
section 2, we review the relevant theory and develop
the research hypothesis. Section 3 describes the
research methods. Section 4 presents a synthesis of
the key findings and their broader implications, while
the last Section concludes the paper.
2 Literature Review and Hypotheses
2.1 Background of Corporate Cash Holdings
The level of cash holdings can be influenced by
numerous factors such as industry characteristics,
financial stability, investment opportunities, risk
management strategies, and the overall financial
health and objectives of the organization. According
to the literature, there are three theories concerned
with cash holding determinants. First, the tradeoff
theory made by [11], argues that firms perceive the
marginal benefits and cost of holding cash to
maximize the shareholder's value. The benefits of
cash holding stem from Keynesian Economics
Theory which explains the motives for holding liquid
assets. These motives are related to the transaction
cost, the precautionary, and the speculative. In line
with the transaction cost motive, holding cash allows
firms to minimize the costs of exchange to liquidate
assets. More specifically, firms hold the cash only to
surpass the higher opportunity cost in case of a lower
cash level. The second motive assumes that holding
cash by firms, to cover their financial needs,
constitutes a precautionary strategy to safeguard
against the inability to raise funds at a lower cost,
[12]. Finally, the speculative motives consider that
cash holding serves as a financing source for future
investment opportunities, [13] and [14].
The Pecking Order Theory implies that firms with
higher cash holdings prioritize the financing of their
investments and operations using internal funds (such
as retained earnings) rather than external financing.
According to this theory, external financing, such as
issuing new equity or debt, is considered a last resort
when internal funds are insufficient. Depending on
their cash reserves, such businesses may avoid the
expenses and possible problems associated with
external borrowing. Therefore, cash reserves may
conform to the Pecking Order Theory by supplying
companies with internal resources to pay for their
operations. Nevertheless, it is crucial to effectively
control the ideal amount of cash reserves to strike a
balance between the advantages of using internal
funds and the possible drawbacks of amassing
excessive cash.
The Free Cash Flow Theory suggests that a
company's operational cash flows shape its cash
reserves, which it uses to cover operating expenses,
finance investments, and safeguard against financial
risks. Therefore, companies need to guarantee
enough liquid assets to meet their operational costs
and take advantage of potential investment prospects.
Emerging economies and established markets
have lots of characteristics that affect coin holdings.
As part of its Vision 2030 purpose to decrease
reliance on oil, Saudi Arabia, the largest economic
system in the Middle East and heavily dependent on
the oil industry, has assigned monetary
diversification tasks. In recent years, the non-oil
sector has shown signs of growth, driven by sectors
such as construction, tourism, and entertainment.
However, oil production and prices remain crucial
factors influencing the overall economic
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
174
Volume 20, 2024
performance. Furthermore, cash holdings continue to
retain importance for Saudi firms as part of their
overall financial management strategy and risk
mitigation efforts. Therefore, they continually assess
and manage their cash based on their specific
circumstances and financial objectives.
Several researchers have studied the
determinants of cash holdings in the Saudi context.
Using a sample of 70 firms listed on the Saudi Stock
Exchange for the period 2006-2014, [15], found that
several firm sizes, leverage, capital expenditure, net
working capital, and cash flow volatility, play
significant roles in determining the level of cash
holdings among these firms. Similarly, [16],
examined the cash holding decisions of Shariah-
compliant firms in six GCC markets during the
period 2005 to 2019. The authors provided support
that the cash holding decisions can be best explained
using the pecking order theory. This result reveals
that Shariah-compliant firms rely on liquid assets as
their first financing option. Based on a sample of the
largest 50 firms listed in the Saudi stock market
during the Covid-19 period, [17], demonstrates a
positive correlation between corporate cash holdings
and factors such as leverage and ownership
concentration. Also, the authors report that cash
holding is negatively correlated with firm size, cash
flow, growth opportunities, working capital, and
dividends. Similarly, [18], investigates how corporate
cash management practices adapt and respond to the
shifts in cash flow uncertainty and financing
challenges that have arisen due to the Covid-19
crisis. The authors found that in 2020, firms impacted
by the Covid-19 crisis responded to heightened
uncertainty by increasing their cash reserves.
Additionally, unaffected firms, which had a large size
and better access to financial markets and internal
capital sources, also exhibited an increase in their
cash holdings. This implies that even firms with
relatively stable operations recognized the
importance of building up cash reserves as a
precautionary measure during uncertain times.
2.2 Determinants of Corporate Cash Holdings
2.2.1 Firm Size
Firm size is a widely examined determinant of a
firm's cash holdings. According to [19], larger firms
typically encounter fewer financial barriers and enjoy
enhanced access to external financing sources. As a
result, they are less reliant on internal resources to
meet their liquidity needs. Moreover, their
considerable size and market presence often generate
more consistent and substantial cash flows.
Consequently, it is generally expected that, according
to the trade-off theory, there is a negative correlation
between liquidity and firm size. Oppositely, the
pecking order theory asserts that Cash holdings tend
to be positively correlated with firm size as larger
firms are typically associated with higher historical
profitability and, consequently, a greater
accumulation of cash. We contend that firm size is a
significant factor influencing cash holdings. Hence,
such influence can differ both to before and during
the Covid-19 pandemic. before the Covid-19
pandemic, larger firms typically maintained higher
cash holdings in comparison to smaller firms. This
disparity can be attributed to the advantages enjoyed
by larger firms. During the COVID-19 pandemic,
numerous firms encountered significant disruptions
in their cash flows, coupled with increased
operational costs and a pressing need to preserve
liquidity. Consequently, both large and small firms
likely intensified their focus on cash management
and liquidity preservation measures. Therefore, we
retain the pecking order theory to formulate our first
hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1: During COVID-19, there is a positive
relationship between firm size and cash holding.
2.2.2 Dividends Payment
Based on the mixed findings from previous research,
the association between cash levels and dividend
payments is hypothesized to be ambiguous. Some
studies confirm the trade-off theory and suggest a
negative association between dividend payments and
corporate cash levels. Accordingly, firms reduce
dividend payments to retain more earnings internally,
thereby increasing their cash reserves. This increased
availability of cash can enhance the firm's financial
flexibility and reduce the need to rely on external
sources of funding, such as debt or equity issuance.
Other studies have observed a positive relationship,
suggesting that shareholders may allow management
to retain more cash for future opportunities.
Therefore, the overall direction of the relationship
between cash levels and dividend payments remains
uncertain. However, the effect of dividend payments
on cash holdings during the COVID-19 pandemic
can be influenced by various factors and may vary
across different firms and industries. The firm who's
severely affected by the pandemic's economic
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
175
Volume 20, 2024
disruptions, opted to reduce or suspend dividend
payments altogether. This decision was driven by the
need to conserve cash and maintain liquidity during a
period of heightened uncertainty. Besides,
Shareholders may have recognized the importance of
cash retention during the pandemic and supported
management's decisions to retain cash to ensure the
long-term viability and the firm's growth. Therefore,
Therefore, we retain the trade-off theory to formulate
our second hypothesis:
Hypothesis 2: During COVID-19, there is a
negative relationship between dividend payout and
cash holding.
2.2.3 Cash Flow
Cash flow and cash holdings are inherently
interconnected. The surplus generated from cash flow
plays a crucial role in determining the firm's cash
holdings. Besides, positive cash flow allows for the
accumulation of cash reserves, which can be used for
investments, meeting financial obligations, and
supporting various operational and strategic
initiatives. Conversely, a negative or insufficient cash
flow may impede a firm's ability to maintain
adequate cash holdings or require the utilization of
existing reserves. Thus, the agency theory of [20],
suggests that when cash flow improves, there is an
increased risk of agency costs arising from
management's inclination to maximize their interests
by accumulating more liquid assets instead of
utilizing them optimally. Therefore, it is proposed
that there exists a positive relationship between cash
flow, and cash holdings, [21].
During the Covid-19 pandemic, firms
experienced a significant disruption in cash flow,
including declines in revenue and increases in
expenses. Therefore, holding higher levels of cash
can be useful for navigating these uncertainties,
mitigating financial risks, and providing a cushion
against short-term financial difficulties. In this
regard, we formulate the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 3: During COVID-19, there is a positive
relationship between cash flow and cash holding.
2.2.4 Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Academic Finance considers the weighted average
cost of capital (WACC) remains as a timely area of
interest during a volatile environment and, especially,
during the Covid-19 crisis, [22]. This measure of a
firm's cost of capital presents a combination between
the cost of debt and the cost of equity that firms are
supposed to ensure its alignment with capital
structure and create value for stakeholders. When a
firm identifies that its cost of capital is high, it prefers
to be more demanding in terms of investment
choices. Moreover, they can even lead to the
abandonment of certain projects. In this case, firms
may retain less cash for investments and retain more
cash holdings to improve liquidity, [23]. In addition,
a higher WACC capital is generally associated with
minimal dependence on external sources of finance
such as debt or equity issuance. By persevering in a
higher level of cash, firms attempt to improve their
financial stability by achieving an optimal level of
financial structure.
The specialists consider that the increase in
WACC during the crisis period can be explained by
the elevated expected return on equity. Based on a
sample of 30 Danish quoted firms from 2003 to
2010, [24], reports that investors stipulate more risk
premium during the pre-crisis period, which
increases the WACC. Thus, firms will be compelled
to ensure liquidity and address the risks associated
with limited access to external financing. Therefore,
we expect that, during COVID-19, Saudi firms may
choose the precautionary measure by maintaining
more cash holdings. Therefore, we formulate the
following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 4: During COVID-19, there is a positive
relationship between WACC and cash holding.
2.2.5 Return on Invested Capital
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is an
indicator of the firm ability to create value.
According to [25], this financial measure
demonstrates the efficiency in the use of capital by
managers. About COVID-19, firms experienced a
notable drop in income. The study of [26], supports
this idea. By using a sample of 27,944 listed firms in
78 countries, the authors have noted that the cause of
the decrease in investment opportunities during the
pandemic is primarily related to the reduced
sensitivity of investment expenditures to the
internally generated cash flows. This decline may
affect the internally generated cash flows to finance
investment and, in turn, the firm ability to generate
returns on invested capital. Based on these
considerations, firms that quickly adapted to the
Covid-19 pandemic may have minimized the
negative impact on their ROIC, while those that
faced difficulty in adapting to the circumstances may
have faced challenges in maintaining profitability.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
176
Volume 20, 2024
In the Saudi Context, [27] and [28], found that the
Covid-19 pandemic had a negative influence on the
total firm's investments and total revenues. To sum
up, we expect that, during the pandemic, Saudi firms
that face a decrease in return on invested capital may
opt to hold more cash as a precautionary measure. In
uncertain times, these firms may increase their cash
holdings to ensure they have sufficient liquidity to
meet operational needs, fulfill debt obligations, and
capitalize on potential investment opportunities.
Under such arguments, we assume that:
Hypothesis 5: During COVID-19, there is a positive
relationship between Return on Invested Capital
and cash holding.
2.2.6 Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures refer to the funds invested in
long-term assets to support a firm's operations and
generate future income. Generally, capital
investments are made using the available cash or
money borrowed. In this case, the firm's cash
holdings would decrease as it is being a relatively
cheaper source to finance the capital expenditures.
Focusing on a sample of 4107 firms in emerging
economies for the period 2010-2018, [29], argues
that cash accumulation in times of crisis is oriented to
capital expenditures. Conversely, some researchers
stated that there is no significant relationship between
the two variables during the crisis period.
Regarding capital expenditures and cash holdings
during the Covid-19 pandemic, firms experienced a
decline in cash holdings as they redirected funds
toward capital expenditures. The decision to invest in
capital projects during the pandemic required firms to
allocate cash resources for long-term investments,
which could lead to a decrease in their immediate
cash reserves. This discussion leads to the following
hypothesis:
Hypothesis 6: During COVID-19, there is a
negative relationship between capital expenditures
and cash holding.
2.2.7 Net Working Capital
Net working capital primarily comprises liquid assets
that act as substitutes for cash. It is used in
supporting the optimal balance of current liabilities.
The interplay between net working capital and cash
holdings offers a nuanced perspective on how firms
manage their short-term liquidity requirements.
Thus, the trade-off theory proposes that there is an
inverse relationship between cash and net working
capital. Hence, more the efficient of working capital
management, the lesser the requirement for cash
holding.
Moreover, recent research has discovered a
negative correlation between cash holdings and net
working capital. This inverse relationship challenges
the traditional trade-off theory. Focusing on a sample
of Saudi firms during the period 2006-2014, [30],
shows a negative relationship between net working
capital and cash holdings, implying that firms can
convert their higher liquid assets into cash.
Consequently, they have less need to hold cash.
In contrast to these studies, [31], find a positive
relationship between these two variables. Using 164
Brazilian listed firms. A higher net working capital
leads to higher profitability. Thus, the profit
generated will be used for holding cash.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, we argue that
the negative relationship between net working capital
and cash holdings can be attributed to firms'
proactive efforts to streamline their operations,
reduce working capital inefficiencies, and maintain
financial stability. Further, the economic downturn
and disruptions in supply chains may have
necessitated a more cautious approach to cash
management. About this, we construct the following
hypothesis:
Hypothesis 7: During covid-19, there is a negative
relationship between a firm's cash holdings and its
net working capital.
3 Research Methods
3.1 Data
In our empirical analysis, we have collected data
from a sample of 120 companies listed on the Saudi
Stock Exchange (Tadawul) from 2012 to 2022. It is
worth mentioning that we excluded financial
institutions from our sample because they are subject
to specific rules and regulations that distinguish them
from other industries. The declaration of the COVID-
19 outbreaks as a Public Health Emergency of
International Concern by the World Health
Organization (WHO) on January 30, 2020, led us to
divide our sample into two groups: one before
COVID-19 (from 2012 to 2019) and one after Covid-
19 (from 2020 to 2022). The Table 1 presents
showcases the ranking of the sample according to
their respective industries.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
177
Volume 20, 2024
Table 1. Classification of firms by sectors
Sectors
No. Firms
Materials
37
Industrials
24
Consumer Discretionary
19
Consumer Staples
16
Real Estate
8
Health Care
7
Energy
5
Telecommunication
Services
4
3.2 Variables Measurement and Research
Model
We used a panel data approach to estimate the model,
incorporating both cross-sectional and time series
dimensions. We performed diagnostic tests to review
the problems of heteroscedasticity and
multicollinearity. The Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey test
was employed to detect the presence of
heteroskedasticity problems. Thus, the results
indicated a rejection of the homoscedasticity
hypothesis. besides, the Wooldridge (2002) test
revealed a significant presence of first-order
autocorrelation in the error terms. Thus, we
recommend utilizing the Generalized Least Squares
(GLS) method. Our model is defined as follows:
𝐶𝐴𝑆𝐻𝑖,𝑡 = 𝛽0+ 𝛽1𝑆𝐼𝑍𝐸𝑖,𝑡 + 𝛽2𝐷𝐼𝑉
𝑖,𝑡 + 𝛽3𝐶𝐹𝑖,𝑡 +
𝛽4𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶𝑖,𝑡 + 𝛽5𝑅𝑂𝐼𝐶𝑖,𝑡 + 𝛽6𝐶𝐴𝑃𝐸𝑋𝑖,𝑡 +
𝛽6𝑁𝑊𝐶𝑖,𝑡 + 𝜀𝑖𝑡
(1)
Where, i and t refer to firm and time.
Based on several previous empirical works
dealing with the determinants of cash holding, our
variables are defined as follows (Table 2).
Table 2. Variable definitions and sources
Variable
Acronym
Estimation
Cash holding
CASH
Cash and equivalents/ (Total assets – Cash and equivalents).
Firm size
SIZE
The logarithm of total assets
Dividend Payments
DIV
DIV = (total dividends paid - special dividends) ÷ (shares outstanding)
Cash Flow ratio
CF
cash flow to net assets
Weighted Average
Cost of Capital
WACC
Equity/ (Equity + Debt) *Cost of Equity + Debt / (Equity + Debt) *Cost of
Debt* (1 - Tax Rate)
Return on Invested
Capital
ROIC
EBIT x (1 – tax rate) / Invested Capital
Capital expenditures
CAPEX
Capital expenditures divided by total assets
Net working capital
NWC
((Current assets - Cash and equivalents) – Current liabilities) /Total assets
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
178
Volume 20, 2024
4 Results
4.1 Summary Statistics
Table 3 presents a comprehensive analysis of the
statistical measures. We note that the average cash
holding level for the entire period under examination
is 12%. However, during the Covid-19 period, there
was a specific decline in this variable from 13% to
11%. This indicates that Saudi firms had less
available cash during that particular time. Moreover,
the size of the firms remained consistent before and
after the COVID-19 period, indicating no significant
fluctuations in their size. Notably, the average
dividend payout for Saudi firms increased from 30%
to 32%. This suggests positive financial performance
or sufficient cash reserves to distribute higher
dividends to shareholders. The research reveals that
Saudi firms experienced a decrease in cash flow
during the COVID-19 period, with the average
declining from 11% to 9%. This result can be linked
to the economic disruptions caused by the pandemic.
It also can be seen that the average WACC decreased
from 8% to 6%. This result proves the effectiveness
of measures implemented by the Saudi government
to mitigate the epidemic and reduce its Outbreak.
Similarly, the results show that the average ROIC
remains unchanged during the two periods, implying
that Saudi firms have quickly adapted to the Covid-
19 pandemic and have minimized the negative
impact on their ROIC. the descriptive Analysis
demonstrates that Saudi firms experienced a
reduction in capital expenditures from 8% to 6%,
which proves that Saudi firms had postponed planned
capital expenditures during the epidemic. In addition,
was a result of increased caution and prioritization of
cash preservation, leading to a delay or reduction in
long-term asset investments. Finally, the descriptive
statistics highlight the stability of NWC throughout
the entire study period.
Table shows that the highest correlation
coefficient observed among the variables is 0.52. This
correlation is specifically between the WACC and the
return on the invested ratio. These findings suggest
that the explanatory variables are relatively
independent of each other, which strengthens the
reliability of the results. By examining the Variance
Inflation Factor (VIF) scores associated with the
correlation coefficients, Table 4 confirmed that there
are no significant issues of multicollinearity. This
suggests that the independent variables included in
the analysis are not highly correlated with each other.
Table 4. Pearson Correlation matrix and Variance
Inflation Factor (VIF)
SIZE
DIV
CF
WACC
ROIC
Capex
NWC
SIZE
1
DIV
0.010
1
CF
-0.027
0.236
1
WACC
0.004
0.156
0.379
1
ROIC
-0.062
0.314
0.504
0.527
1
Capex
0.008
-0.012
0.236
0.095
0.095
1
NWC
-0.259
0.193
0.110
0.139
0.326
-0.253
1
Variance Inflation Factor
SIZE
DIV
CF
WACC
ROIC
Capex
NWC
VIF
1.08
1.14
1.46
1.42
1.86
1.17
1.34
1/ VIF
0.92
0.87
0.68
0.70
0.53
0.85
0.74
4.2 Regression Analysis
Table 5 shows the Generalized Least Square (GLS)
estimators for our regression models.
Table 5. Results of FGLS Estimates
Before COVID-19
Under COVID-19
Variables
Coef
Sig
Coef
Sig
SIZE
0.032
0.000***
0.085
0.005**
DIV
- 0.031
0.000***
- 0.013
0.011**
CF
0.078
0.008***
0.057
0.003***
WACC
- 0.060
0.134
0.090
0.062*
ROIC
0.042
0.232
- 0.055
0.031*
CAPEX
0.108
0.000***
0.019
0.397
NWC
0.399
0.000***
0.358
0.000***
Wald
chi2(7)
803.66
801.18
Prob> chi2
0.0000
0.0000
No.obs
821
360
Note: *, ** and *** illustrate a significance level at 1%, 5%,
and 10% respectively.
5 Discussions
The results from Table 5 reveal a noteworthy finding
regarding the relationship between firm size and cash
holdings level before and during the COVID-19
Table 3. Descriptive statistics
Variables
Whole sample
Before COVID-
19
Under COVID-
19
Mean
Std.
Dev
Mean
Std.
Dev
Mean
Std.
Dev
CASH
0.12
0.14
0.13
0.15
0.11
0.13
SIZE
8.73
0.68
8.69
0.67
8.81
0.69
DIV
0.29
0.32
0.30
0.31
0.32
0.33
CF
0.11
0.10
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.09
WACC
0.08
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.05
ROIC
0.09
0.12
0.09
0.12
0.09
0.12
Capex
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.06
0.07
NWC
0.14
0.19
0.14
0.19
0.14
0.18
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
179
Volume 20, 2024
pandemic. We find a significant and positive
correlation, consistent with the findings of [18] and
the predictions of the pecking order theory. Therefore,
our Hypothesis 1 is accepted. Besides, the coefficient
between these variables has increased from 3.2% to
8.5% during the Pandemic. This result confirmed that
the considerable size and market presence of Saudi
firms enable them to adapt rapidly to economic
shocks and generate more consistent and substantial
cash flows.
A significant and negative association was found
between dividend payment and cash holdings levels
before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore,
our Hypothesis 2 is accepted. This finding is
consistent with the results of [6] and [21] who
observe that firms decrease dividend payments to
retain more earnings internally, leading to an increase
in cash reserves. Similarly, the coefficient between
these variables has decreased from 3.1% to 1.3%.
This outcome confirms the trade-off theory,
suggesting that Saudi firms have preferred to reduce
dividend payments during COVID-19 to hold more
cash.
The results indicate that cash flow is significantly
and positively correlated with cash holdings in all two
sub-periods. Even though the coefficient between the
two variables has decreased from 7.8% to 5.7%, the
result indicates that Saudi firms have strategically
mitigated the risks of the uncertainties of the
pandemic by maintaining higher cash holding through
cash flow and, as a consequence, protecting
themselves against short-term financial challenges.
This finding provides support for the pecking order
theory and converges with that of [8] and [21].
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital exhibits a
positive coefficient during the pandemic. Thus,
Hypothesis 4 is proven. This outcome converges with
that of [24], who explains that investors stipulate
more risk premium during the pre-crisis period, which
increases the WACC. Consequently, firms must hold
more cash and address the risks associated with
limited access to external financing. More specially,
Saudi firms have minimized their dependence on
external financing during the crisis period. The cost of
equity tends to increase due to higher perceived risks
and market uncertainties. In turn, investors requested
a higher return on their equity to compensate for the
increased risk, leading to a higher cost of equity.
Additionally, lenders and investors perceive
heightened risks and uncertainties during the COVID-
19 pandemic, resulting in higher borrowing costs to
compensate for the increased credit risk. Therefore,
the higher cost of debt or equity financing can make it
more expensive to raise external funds. In such
circumstances, Saudi firms have chosen to maintain
higher levels of cash holdings to reduce their
dependence on external financing and mitigate
potential liquidity risks.
As seen in Table 5, the impact of return on invested
capital is statistically significant and negatively
related to cash holding during the Pandemic, leading
to the rejection of Hypothesis 5. This finding is
consistent with the results of [10] and [27], who found
that the Covid-19 pandemic had a negative influence
on firms' total investment and revenue. More
specifically, when Saudi firms have achieved a higher
return on invested capital before and during the
pandemic, it indicates that their investments are
generating greater profits and returns. Therefore, they
have chosen to allocate their excess cash towards new
investment opportunities rather than holding it as
cash. This result confirms the free cash flow theory
which implies that managers must utilize the cash
reserves to create Shareholders' wealth.
When we interact capital expenditures with cash
holding, we find that the coefficient on the
interaction term is positive (0.108) and significant at
the 5% level before the Covid-19 pandemic, but the
value is not significant during the pandemic period.
This result is consistent with the finding of literature
in the context of Omani firms, leading us to reject
Hypothesis 6.
Regarding net working capital, the analysis rejects
the trade-off theory hypothesis. The coefficient is
positively and statistically significantly associated
with an increase in cash holdings during the Covid-
19 pandemic. Firms with higher liquidity are likelier
to hold high cash reserves. This result is consistent
with existing empirical research of [10] and [18],
which indicates that a higher net working capital
leads to higher profitability. Thus, the profit
generated will be used for holding cash. Particularly,
Saudi firms have recognized strategic investment
opportunities resulting from market disruptions or
distress in certain sectors. By taking advantage of
favorable valuations, they seek to enhance their long-
term growth prospects. These investments contribute
to the rise in cash holdings by improving revenue
generation and facilitating expansion activities.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
180
Volume 20, 2024
6 Conclusions
This empirical study examines the factors influencing
cash holdings during a pandemic by analyzing a
sample of 120 companies listed on the Saudi Stock
Exchange from 2012 to 2022. The sample is divided
into pre-Covid and Covid phases to investigate the
effects of the pandemic. We have selected the most
common determinant used in the literature review.
Furthermore, we have introduced the weighted
average cost of capital and the return on invested
capital ratio as new variables that can better explain
the motives for holding cash.
The results emphasize significant points based on
the summary statistics. During the COVID-19
pandemic, we provide evidence that Saudi firms
experienced a decrease in mean values of cash
holdings, cash flow, cost of capital, and Capital
expenditures. Conversely, firm size and dividend
payment recognized an increase in the same period.
However, net working capital and return on invested
capital remained unchanged.
By conducting our regressions on the sub-samples,
the results of the Generalized Least Square regression
indicate that the size of Saudi firms enables them to
adapt rapidly to economic shocks and generate more
consistent and substantial cash flows. In addition,
they have decided to reduce dividend payments
during COVID-19 to hold more cash. Research
results revealed that cash flow is significantly and
positively correlated with cash holdings, implying
that Saudi firms have mitigated the risks of the
uncertainties of the pandemic through cash flow to
maintain higher cash holdings.
The coefficient of cost of capital decreased from
8% before the pandemic to 6%, indicating that Saudi
firms have chosen to maintain higher levels of cash
holdings to reduce their dependence on external
financing. Additionally, the empirical evidence
shows a significant and negative association between
return on invested capital and cash holding during the
Pandemic. This result reveals that Saudi firms have
chosen to allocate their excess cash towards new
investment opportunities rather than holding it as
cash. Finally, we find that Saudi firms have
recognized strategic investment opportunities during
the pandemic which, in turn, contributed to an
increase in cash holdings. Overall, our study suggests
that Saudi firms have maintained consistent cash
management practices and have been relatively
unaffected by the outbreak.
The findings contribute to the existing knowledge
of corporate finance and provide insights into
additional factors influencing cash management
decisions. To conclude, the present study will have a
substantial impact on the academic accounting
literature by advancing our understanding of the
determinants and motivations that drive theories
about corporate cash holdings. Furthermore, it will
make a valuable contribution to the existing body of
literature concerning the precautionary measures
employed by the Saudi Arabian government to
safeguard Saudi firms amidst the COVID-19
pandemic. These contributions will provide
researchers and corporations' management with
valuable insights, facilitating a deeper
comprehension of the factors that shape cash
management strategies and aiding in the development
of effective crisis management and government
intervention strategies.
References:
[1] Opler, T. (1999). The determinants and
implications of corporate cash holdings.
Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3–46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00003-
3
[2] Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M.
(2008). Why Do U.S. Firms Hold so Much
More Cash than They Used to? SSRN
Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.927962
[3] Aftab, U., Javid, A. Y., & Akhter, W. (2018,
June 10). The Déterminants of Cash Holdings
around Different Regions of the World.
Business & Economic Review, 10(2), 151–182.
https://doi.org/10.22547/ber/10.2.7
[4] Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M.
S. (2004). The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash.
The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1777–1804.
[5] Miller, M.H., & Orr, D. (1966). A Model of the
Demand for Money by Firms. The Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 80(3), 413.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1880728
[6] Jensen, M. C. (1999). Agency Cost of Free
Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.
SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.99580
[7] Fritz Foley, C., Hartzell, J. C., Titman, S., &
Twite, G. (2007). Why do firms hold so much
cash? A tax-based explanation. Journal of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
181
Volume 20, 2024
Financial Economics, 86(3), 579–607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.006
[8] Chung, H. J., Jhang, H., & Ryu, D. (2023).
Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on corporate
cash holdings: Evidence from Korea. Emerging
Markets Review, 56, 101055.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101055
[9] He, Z., Suardi, S., Wang, K., & Zhao, Y.
(2022). Firms’ COVID-19 Pandemic Exposure
and Corporate Cash Policy: Evidence from
China. Economic Modelling, 116, 105999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.10599
9
[10] Makni, M. S. (2023). Analyzing the impact of
COVID-19 on the performance of listed firms
in Saudi market. Technological Forecasting
and Social Change, 187, 122171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122171
[11] Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate
borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics,
5(2), 147–175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(77)90015-0
[12] Potì, V., Pattitoni, P., & Petracci, B. (2020).
Precautionary motives for private firms’ cash
holdings. International Review of Economics &
Finance, 68, 150–166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.03.003
[13] Yilmaz, I., & Samour, A. (2024). The Effect of
Cash Holdings on Financial Performance:
Evidence from Middle Eastern and North
African Countries. Journal of Risk and
Financial Management, 17(2), 53.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17020053
[14] Abdulrahman, B. M. A., Yahia, A. E.,
Abdalrhman, H. A., & Helal, T. O. A. (2020).
The Effect of Debts on Economic
Development. Academy of Accounting and
Financial Studies Journal, 24(3), 1-8.
[15] Guizani, M. (2017). The financial determinants
of corporate cash holdings in an oil rich
country: Evidence from Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 133–
143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.05.003
[16] Alnori, F., Bugshan, A., & Bakry, W. (2021).
The determinants of corporate cash holdings:
evidence from Shariah-compliant and non-
Shariah-compliant corporations. Managerial
Finance, 48(3), 429–450.
https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-02-2021-0085
[17] Aldoseri, M. M., Albaz, M. M., & Ghali, A. A.
(2022). The Impact of Organizational
Characteristics on Corporate Cash Holdings :
Evidence from Saudi Arabia During COVID-
19 Period. Information Sciences Letters, 11(4),
1131–1136.
https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/110415
[18] Diaw, A. (2021). Corporate cash holdings in
emerging markets. Borsa Istanbul Review,
21(2), 139–148.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.09.005
[19] Jebran, K., Iqbal, A., Bhat, K. U., Khan, M. A.,
& Hayat, M. (2019). Determinants of corporate
cash holdings in tranquil and turbulent period:
evidence from an emerging economy.
Financial Innovation, 5(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-018-0116-y
[20] Ozkan, A., & Ozkan, N. (2004). Corporate
cash holdings: An empirical investigation of
UK companies. Journal of Banking & Finance,
28(9), 2103–2134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.08.003
[21] Al-Najjar, B. (2013). The financial
determinants of corporate cash holdings:
Evidence from some emerging markets.
International Business Review, 22(1), 77–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.02.004
[22] Mouline, B., & Sadok, H. (2021). Corporate
Cash Holdings and Agency Conflicts:
Evidence from Moroccan Developing Market.
Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance,
9(1), 24–32.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090103
[23] Dobrowolski, Z., Drozdowski, G., Panait, M.,
& Apostu, S. A. (2022, September 12). The
Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Its
Universality in Crisis Times: Evidence from
the Energy Sector. Energies, 15(18), 6655.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186655
[24] Mortal, S., Nanda, V., & Reisel, N. (2020).
Why do private firms hold less cash than
public firms? International evidence on cash
holdings and borrowing costs. Journal of
Banking & Finance, 113, 105722.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105722
[25] Hundal, S., Sandstrom, A., & Uskumbayeva,
A. (2018). The Impact of The Financial Crisis
On Corporate Capital Structure Dynamics In
The Nordic Countries. Eurasian Journal of
Economics and Finance, 6(3), 34–51.
https://doi.org/10.15604/ejef.2018.06.03.003
[26] Tram Le, T. H. (2023). Return On Invested
Capital, Return on Investment, A Measure Of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
182
Volume 20, 2024
The Profitability Of Invested Capital, Research
Evidence At Song Hong Garment Joint Stock
Company. International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis,
06(08).
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i8-60
[27] Thai, T. H. A., Vo, T. T. A., & Mazur, M.
(2023). COVID-19 and investment–cash-flow
sensitivity: A cross-country analysis. Research
in International Business and Finance, 66,
102014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102014
[28] Alessa, A. A., Alotaibie, T.M., Elmoez, Z., &
Alhamad, H. E. (2021). Impact of COVID19
on entrepreneurship and consumer behavior: a
case study in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of
Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8 (5),
201- 210.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0
201
[29] Riddick, L. A., & Whited, T. M. (2009). The
Corporate Propensity to Save. The Journal of
Finance, 64(4), 1729–1766.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-
6261.2009.01478.x
[30] Al-Amarneh, A. (2015). Corporate Cash
Holdings and Financial Crisis: Evidence from
Jordan. International Business Research, 8(5).
https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n5p212
[31] Morais, F., Nave, A., & Rodrigues, R. G.
(2019). Cash Holdings Determinants from
Brazilian Listed Firms. Lecture Notes in
Electrical Engineering, 505, pp1043–1050.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed to the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_
US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2024.20.18
Dabboussi Moez,
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed Abdulrahman
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
183
Volume 20, 2024