Assessment of Potential SMEs Projects to Sustainable Success
WASANA SINRUNGTAM1, CHITRALADA TRISAKHON2,
KRISADA CHIENWATTANASOOK2*
1Department of International Business, Faculty of Business Administration,
Rajamangala University of Technology,
Thanyaburi,
THAILAND
2Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration,
Rajamangala University of Technology,
Thanyaburi,
THAILAND
*Corresponding Author
Abstract: - This research aims to evaluate the project's success from the stakeholders in creating sustainable
outcomes and identify the problems and obstacles in the development of online marketing projects. The study
takes a mixed-method approach, obtaining information from three distinct groups of people: customers
(through qualitative research), business owners (through quantitative research), and government officials and
municipal administrators (through qualitative research). This study highlights the imperative of incorporating
the collective efforts of all three groups to enhance the likelihood of achieving success and maintaining the
project's long-term viability. Previously, the absence of collaborative management has resulted in the
misallocation of resources toward resolving issues that were not aligned with the intended objectives. Upon
examination of the business owners, it was discovered that implementing additional sales channels gave a
notable and favorable outcome. The project evaluation using the CIPP model revealed that the processes
implemented for customer management were deemed of exceptional quality. Critical difficulties and challenges
were also noted, such as the requirement for business owners to possess IT skills to produce compelling media
and the customers' desire for a user-friendly platform design. In the public sector, it is found that the
government should evaluate entrepreneurial endeavors to find those deserving of continued development. Other
recommendations for this study include offering support as a best practice and developing long-term evaluation
standards.
Key-Words: - Community Enterprise, Project Evaluation, Sustainable Success
Received: March 12, 2023. Revised: August 14, 2023. Accepted: October 7, 2023. Published: October 17, 2023.
1 Introduction
The COVID-19 crisis is a big wave that has caused
significant disruption and has had a substantial
impact on the economy. It affects the supply chains
of companies dependent on income from other
countries, such as tourism, imports, and exports,
and it has also had the same effect on community
businesses. They immediately adjusted and were on
the lookout for fresh possibilities. Both
communities and community enterprises will
benefit if community enterprises can adapt to this
wave of COVID-19 sustainably. Many towns and
businesses know this, particularly food-related and
food-processing firms that are assumed to be
prepared for adjustments to survive the crisis. They
are also attempting to persuade the community to take
a new path, which they call the "online path." This is
their take on a format that some community members
may not be familiar with, such as buying food online
and having it delivered by one of the many popular
courier services. In addition to this, they have devised
methods for posting information regarding product
sales and routes of distribution that are recommended.
The brains of communities have been opened up to
new ideas, and technological advancements have
been made to enhance distribution routes, even while
the communities have maintained their physical
isolation. Because of this, they can transform their
company throughout the New Normal and sustainably
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1103
Volume 19, 2023
emerge victorious from the crisis. Online sales during
COVID-19 allow businesses to publish product sales
24 hours a day, providing flexibility for both sellers
and customers while removing the need for a physical
storefront entirely.
Through a strategy for economic recovery, the
government is attempting to expedite the
implementation of assistance policies as quickly as
possible. The primary emphasis of the plan is to help
local businesses resolve difficulties relating to the
quality of raw materials and their processing,
production, and product backlog issues in the region,
as well as issues with the distribution and export of
goods in the region. This is done with the goals of
revitalizing the area and producing cash, establishing
new local enterprises, stimulating more learning and
innovation in commerce on digital market platforms
online, and fostering the growth of the local economy.
The process of utilizing agricultural items as
significant production inputs is the process that is
known as the food industry. Some examples of
agricultural products are grains, animals, and
fisheries. During manufacturing, various
technologies are utilized to create consumer-
friendly items or commodities that can be put to
further productive use. In addition, it involves
prolonging the shelf life of agricultural products by
initial or intermediate processing, semi-finished, or
finished goods processing. In the province of
Chachoengsao, this industry is one of the sectors
that has the potential to experience growth in the
years to come. It includes all aspects of the food
processing industry.
As a result, the primary focus of this article will
be an evaluation of the project's overall
performance across all three components. The
following are the components of each course: To
begin, it is necessary to discover people who are
interested in running successful community
companies that deal with food and train them how
to do it. Hands-on business training is frequently
delivered through digital mediums such as
websites, Facebook, and Line OA. Second,
developing various digital data sources and offering
strategic marketing guidance. Third, increasing
brand awareness and customer awareness by
promoting and disseminating information through
various online platforms. Prioritizing long-term
viability increases the likelihood that business
owners can continue operating after completing the
formal project.
This investigation's primary objective is to
develop a method for efficiently obtaining detailed
information from project stakeholders and
evaluating how far along the project is. Everyone
participating in the project will be kept informed of
any restrictions or challenges that may arise
throughout its execution, and they will work
together to figure out solutions to these problems
while the project is still in progress. This activity is
a way of organizing efforts collectively rather than
leaving it as the responsibility of one party as a way
to avoid duplication of work. It is recommended to
have an independent third party be in charge of
performing assessments to maintain openness.
These evaluations should be based on requirements
and the effectiveness of the budget.
1.1 The Objectives of the Research are as
Follows:
1) To assess the project's success from stakeholders
to create sustainability.
2) To determine the issues and challenges of
creating the internet marketing project.
2 Literature Review
2.1 Evaluation Approaches (CIPP Model)
According to, [1], evaluation is the process of
describing, accumulating, and analyzing data to
make appropriate decisions based on the data. The
"CIPP" Evaluation Model is a four-dimensional
system assessment, [2]. The CIPP Model is applied
to analyze system-related processes to the quality,
merit, and relevance of the issue being examined for
decision-making. During the process's evaluation
phase, some factors considered include precision,
practicability, appropriateness, and utility, [3]. The
client or other stakeholders, as well as the
evaluators, are obligated to collaborate on matters
relating to the requirements of evaluation consumers
and the concerns of the beneficiaries. The
investigation considers four issues, each of which
will be discussed in more detail below.
C: Context evaluation is an analysis of the data
pertinent to determining the most important values to
consider while establishing objectives. Beneficiaries'
requirements, assets, and problems in the surrounding
environment are assessed. Additionally, [4], proposes
including input from industry experts, academics, and
policymakers in the review procedure.
I: Input evaluation is an assessment of
preliminary factors or inputs during project
implementation and the adequacy of resources
used, such as personnel, materials, time, as well as
technology and operational plans, [5], for planning
(plans) and selecting strategies that meet the needs
and are feasible, as well as the budgets related to
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1104
Volume 19, 2023
the project plan (budgets of the Selected approach),
[6].
P: Process evaluation is an evaluation of the
operational procedures utilized by the project. This
evaluation may include monitoring and
documenting various actions and the resources
being utilized by the project. According to, [7],
suggest that this should be recorded as proof at
every step to be used as data for further
development, improved efficiency, and higher
productivity. As a result, doing so is quite helpful
in determining the aspects of the successful project
and those that want improvement.
P: Product evaluation is an assessment of the
outcomes of a project, as described by, [8], who
mentioned the usage of the CIPP Model to evaluate
and compare against the objectives, aims, or
predetermined expectations of the project. P: Product
evaluation is an assessment of the outcomes of a
project. This involves the evaluation of the project's
impact, effectiveness (evaluating the quality and
relevance of the outcomes), sustainability (rating the
project's success and continuity), and transportability
(evaluating the potential to adapt the project's success
to other initiatives).
As a result, the concepts and strengths of the
CIPP Model can be separated into two distinct
roles. It is a reliable, complete evaluation method
comprising both formative and summative
evaluation, as stated in a summary supplied by, [6].
The study, [9], uses the role of formative
assessment as a guide to aid in decision-making to
create and refine continuing operations. This
ensures that the project will have a high level of
quality. In addition, [10], analyzes the quality of the
project, as well as its cost-effectiveness and general
significance, using the data from the CIPP. This
evaluation can be seen here. The CIPP Model
should be evaluated once the project has been
finished so that a determination can be made
regarding the quality and the value of the work
done on the project.
The CIPP Model distinguishes itself from
traditional evaluation methods by incorporating a
comprehensive assessment approach. Unlike
conventional evaluations that solely focus on the
outcomes of a project, the CIPP Model evaluates
the project by considering the entire process,
encompassing the input stage through to the
resulting outcomes. If any aspect of the project has
deficiencies, it can be swiftly detected and
remedied.
2.2 Concepts Related to the Success of
Community Enterprises Include the
Following:
When examining the impact of community-based
enterprises on a country's GDP and their
contribution to a nation's journey toward
prosperity, [11], elucidated that community
enterprises possess the capacity to generate both
social and economic value. These organizations
have demonstrated the ability to attain scalability
and sustainability within developing economies.
Community enterprises are widely recognized as a
crucial sector that receives significant
governmental assistance. These firms, operating at
the community level, encounter several hurdles in
performing their commercial activities, primarily
stemming from limited resources such as cash,
knowledge, networks, and marketing channels.
Moreover, the pursuit of sustainable development is
often deemed to be achieved by cultivating the
economy at the grassroots level. This approach is
regarded as genuine due to the pivotal role played
by community companies, which operate
distinctively from conventional profit-oriented
commercial units. Community enterprises aim to
facilitate reciprocal support and assistance within
the local community. According to, [12], achieving
business success is defined as managing activities
in line with the goals. The aims that have been
established for the organization. In other words,
business success is managing activities according
to the organization's goals and aims.
According to, [13], the perceptual evaluation of
business performance can be measured in three
different ways: growth measurement, which includes
measuring revenue, branch expansion, employee
numbers, market share, and profit from operations;
profitability measurement, which includes
measuring profit rates; and survival measurement,
which includes measuring how long the business has
been open, [14]. The research conducted by, [15],
utilized a multidimensional dynamic performance
measuring approach that included the following five
dimensions to evaluate the levels of achievement
attained by groups and organizations.
1) Financial dimensions include capital, sales
volume, net profit, and revenue growth.
2) Marketing dimensions include customer
satisfaction, customer retention rate, and service
quality, [16].
3) Processes and production dimensions include
the time it takes for new products and services to
access the market and the quality of developing
new products and project management processes.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1105
Volume 19, 2023
4) Labor and people development dimensions
include the retention rate of highly skilled
individuals, technical and skill development, and the
quality of leadership development within the
business, [17].
5) Future dimensions involve depth and quality
in strategic planning and preparedness for external
environmental changes, [18].
Indicators of success for community enterprises
highlighted by, [19] are input, process, and output
factors.
1) Input factors for effective management and
administration include accountability and honesty.
The availability of essential resources and skilled
labor in the area also has a role.
2) Process factors (determining the success or
failure of community businesses) include
management, personnel system, leadership,
workforce, and member participation.
3) Output factors include diverse production,
increasing new items, and gaining certification by
community and market criteria. Members of the
group are pleased, and the number of members
grows. Furthermore, benefits are distributed in a
timely and equitable manner.
As a result, the true success of a community
enterprise also depends on four significant factors:
the leadership and ethical conduct of the
community enterprise leaders, the participation of
members within the group, [20], the group learning
of all members within the organization, as
emphasized by, [21], which focuses on setting clear
goals and criteria, and the ability to rely on oneself,
leading members to be aware of desires, roles, and
goals that they are working toward through the
community enterprise. Support from an external
network for learning, the development of thinking
processes, training, and the study of exemplary
practices related to technology and marketing as the
basis for developing innovative products directly
contributing to financial success, [22], including
the creation of another generation of members in
the short and long terms. This will instruct other
communities, convey their expertise, and share
what has been learned by the community.
According to, [23], these variables determine
whether or not a community company may
continue operating without the participation of its
founding members.
2.3 Conceptual Framework on the
Sustainability of Community Enterprises
The operating expenses, labor productivity,
production capacity, land use, profitability,
performance results, growth rates, and
competitiveness of a company are all factors that
are considered when determining its potential for
long-term success, [24]. The ability of a
community company to create money, sustainably
increase income, and provide employment
opportunities for members of the local population
is, nonetheless, the fundamental aspect of a
community company that can be used to evaluate
its long-term viability. It is impossible to
overestimate the significance of three important
aspects, [25].
The economic pillars strive to achieve three
overarching objectives: more production, increased
gratification of core wants, and increased equity in
allocating wealth. Developing a vibrant economy is
another important factor in ensuring long-term
existence. To foster innovation, [26], emphasizes
the need to achieve two goals: increasing
competitiveness and independence. A higher
standard of living, increased stability, and increased
independence are positive developments for the
general population.
The social pillars incorporate the twin tenets of
justice and equality to foster sustainable growth.
According to, [27], argue that equality in people's
ability to participate in society and access its
resources and opportunities is essential.
The environmental pillars consist of things like
sustainable resource utilization and the preservation of
natural capital, both of which have to be preserved
and handed down to subsequent generations, [28].
For community entrepreneurs to achieve
progress toward the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs), they must emphasize collaboration
and the application of innovative technology in the
operations of community companies, [29].
Community enterprises should constantly evolve
their business, especially their products, to meet
rapidly changing customer needs. Accessing Big
Data from an e-commerce system is also a priority.
In addition, the customer's perspective should be
incorporated into the design of packaging that is
clean, safe, and extends shelf life, which will help
make the community enterprise's products more
attractive and easier to market, [30]. Only then can
they make the development that will allow them to
move closer to achieving the SDGs. Community
companies were not properly equipped to respond
to technology-driven web marketing when
businesses worldwide were hit by the COVID-19
pandemic, [31]. Providing assistance and advice to
business owners is one of the government's
priorities in its effort to encourage the growth of
companies in a sustainable manner. Because of this,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1106
Volume 19, 2023
community enterprises can generate cash and offer
employment possibilities at the local level.
Within the framework of community businesses,
the principles of sufficiency economics have been
implemented in Thailand to achieve sustainable
local development. The method in question is
referred to as "sustainable development." This
activity seeks to improve people's livelihoods
without having a harmful influence on the
environment; the increase in individual happiness is
the ultimate goal of this attempt. Software
developers must have love, compassion,
responsibility, and respect for other humans despite
this. It should be no surprise that human flourishing
is intimately tied to progress. According to, [32],
research, the following three concepts serve as the
guiding force for development:
Understanding entails using already collected
data, looking for and exploiting contextual
information, conducting research and analysis, and
conducting experiments until meaningful outcomes
are realized.
Access implies internal explosion, social
intelligence development, and target group
knowledge.
Development refers to work done by the people
themselves, with their support, and through a
system for sharing knowledge that others can
understand and use.
Consequently, the "Royal Principle" is an
excellent path to take for development, as it
addresses societal crises and endeavors to raise
incomes through the pursuit of knowledge until one
reaches a level of self-sufficiency. This level of
self-sufficiency is a significant goal to spread
stability, prosperity, and sustainability at the
individual, community, societal, and national levels
in the future.
Nevertheless, achieving sustainable development
is not entirely dependent on external assistance, such
as financial backing from the government, as it
cannot provide seamless progress due to the absence
of consistent governmental policies. Hence,
community companies ought to depend on self-
sufficiency by employing the subsequent methods:
According to, [33], the critical factors for success in
a group setting include the establishment of robust
cooperative groups, the presence of competent group
leaders, the creation of distinctive products, the
utilization of innovation and technology for product
development, and the establishment of collaborative
networks to enhance the group's internal strength.
2.4 Research Framework
The scope of the research consists of three
main activities (Figure 1).
Fig. 1: Scope of the research
3 Research Methodology
For the objectives of this study, qualitative and
quantitative data were gathered and analyzed using
a mixed methods approach. This research
methodology is called a blended methods approach,
[34]. The research is conducted using the
Convergent Parallel Design, [35], which involves
evaluating the project in two distinct ways:
quantitatively, through the use of surveys as a tool,
and qualitatively, through the conduct of interviews
with stakeholders discussing the project's
completed results. The Convergent Parallel Design
was created by, [35], in 2011.
1) Quantitative research is a survey-based
methodology that employs cross-sectional data. In
this study, the researchers employed structured
questionnaires to acquire survey data from 125
business representatives who are entrepreneurs.
2) Qualitative research is a method of
investigation that entails conducting in-depth
interviews with 25 individuals chosen by
convenience sampling to supplement and support
quantitative research.
In the context of this analysis, the term
"triangulation" refers to developing an all-
encompassing comprehension of a phenomenon
through applying different approaches or sources of
data in quantitative and qualitative research, [36].
Triangulation analysis is also seen as a qualitative
research tool for checking accuracy by combining
data from multiple sources, as, [36], [37], proposed.
This approach combines data from multiple
sources. In this article, a triangle format is
presented, which is comprised of the following
three key assessment data sources:
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1107
Volume 19, 2023
1. Evaluation of the company's sales success
during the project by a group of customers utilizing
qualitative research in the form of interviews with
consumers and analysis using the Grounded Theory
method. The Atlas ti software is what is utilized.
2. Evaluation of the project's overall success by
a group of business owners using quantitative
research in the form of questionnaires and
analyzing the data with confirmatory factor
analysis.
3. Evaluation of the project's performance by
conducting interviews with representatives of
important government agencies to evaluate the
project results and identify challenges and
impediments to online marketing. This is a
qualitative study that was carried out by conducting
consumer interviews and then analyzing the results
using the Grounded Theory methodology. The
Atlas.ti software is what is utilized.
4 Research Findings
The findings of the study can be categorized into
three different categories, namely, the group of
customers, the group of business owners, and the
group of relevant government officials.
Group 1: Customer Group: Perform a
qualitative analysis of the data obtained from the
consumer groups and evaluate the results. The
following analysis diagram demonstrates the
evaluation findings conducted on the business sales
made during the project that the client group
presented (Figure 2).
From a high-level perspective, it can be broken
down into the following two sub-issues:
1. The problem of making recommendations for
increasing the effectiveness of online sales may be
explained using the image, which consists of 12
components grouped in order of decreasing
importance as follows.
Ranking 1: Customers should be able to easily
access media data on the platform, even if they
need to learn more about technology. This could be
done by making buttons or icons on websites that
make it easy for customers who don't know much
about technology; Ranking 2: Business owners
should make static images and videos that look
good and are creative, and that successfully show
how high-quality their products are; Ranking 3:
Having similar goods that don't stand out and don't
have the desired identity is a big problem for online
businesses; Ranking 4: Products should be
improved, such as by using technology to make
them, to make them last longer and be more
durable; Ranking 5: Businesses should expand their
sales outlets across different platforms, like
TikTok, Lazada, Shopee, and Amazon, because
different customer groups are interested in different
platforms; Ranking 6: Business owners should post
text, photos, and videos at regular intervals to keep
customers interested and raise recognition; Ranking
7: Businesses should take part in events like OTOP
exhibitions that are put on by government bodies;
Ranking 8: People who own businesses should
have good transport services and good packaging;
Ranking 9: business owners should have
promotions all year long to boost sales; Ranking
10: Businesses should have unique goods, but they
should also tell stories to show what they do well;
and Ranking 11: Businesses should sell food that is
special to their area and worth promoting and
selling online.
12: The product's design should have a unique and
distinct identity that distinguishes it from other
products (Figure 3, Figure 4).
Fig. 2: Findings of the evaluation conducted on the business sales made during the project from the customer's
perspective (Demand side)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1108
Volume 19, 2023
Fig. 3: Problem of making recommendations for increasing the effectiveness of online sales
Fig. 4: Customer's view on satisfaction and project
outcomesRank 1: Most consumers are pleased with
the project's online sales support and advice.
Rank 2 : Most customers say the project was
successful and generated satisfactory outcomes.
2. Evaluating results from business operators' data
through quantitative analysis.
Group 2, consisting of business owners who are
part of the community enterprise involved in the
project, has undertaken project assessments utilizing
the CIPP Model. This model emphasizes evaluating
the project over its entire lifecycle, from its initiation
to its culmination. In this phase, quantitative research
methods will be utilized to gather data, analyze it
using descriptive statistics, and employ confirmatory
factor analysis. The data on the demographics are
presented in Table 1.
According to Table 2, most participating
business owners are female. They are over the age
of 50, have a bachelor's degree, have been in
business for more than 10 years, and their average
monthly revenue from product sales is less than
10,000 Baht. Additionally, they have been in
business for more than 10 years. These are the
qualities shared by the proprietors of the businesses
taking part.
Table 1. Data on the demographics
Demographic Factors
Frequency
Percentage
(%)
Gender
Male
28
Female
99
Age
Below 20 years old
2
1.6 %
21–30 years old
12
9.6 %
31-40 years old
8
6.4 %
41-50 years old
17
13.6 %
Above 50 years old
66
68.8 %
Education
Below bachelor’s degree
53
42.4 %
Bachelor’s degree
56
44.8 %
Above bachelor’s degree
16
12.8 %
Occupation period
Less than 1 year
10
8.0 %
1-3 years
16
12.8 %
4-6 year
7
5.6 %
7-9 year
20
16.0 %
10 years or above
72
57.6 %
Income (Month)
Less than 10,000 baht
61
48.8 %
10,001-20,000 baht
48
38.4 %
20,001-30,000 baht
8
6.4 %
More than 30,001 baht
8
6.4 %
Total
125
100.0 %
Table 2 shows that a variety of factors
influence project success. The import factors have
the highest average value of 4.55. The composition
factors are the second factor, with a value of 4.50.
The third factor, with a value of 4.49, is production
factors. The fourth element, with a value of 4.32, is
process factors. The fifth component, impact, and
benefits, also have a value of 4.32. Finally, the
contextual components of the problem have a value
of 4.05.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1109
Volume 19, 2023
Table 2. Data and descriptions from descriptive statistics
Variables
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Rank
Context evaluation
1.00
5.00
4.05
0.66
6
Input evaluation
3.67
5.00
4.55
0.43
1
Component evaluation
3.80
5.00
4.50
0.45
2
Process evaluation
3.00
5.00
4.32
0.53
4
Output evaluation
3.00
5.00
4.49
0.55
3
Outcome evaluation
2.75
5.00
4.31
0.55
5
4.1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model
Fig. 5: Confirmatory factor analysis model
Table 3. Confirmatory factor analysis result
Variables
No. of Item
Cronbach’s Alpha
Standardized
Regression Weights
p-value
Rank
Context evaluation
4
0.798
0.183
0.047*
6
Input evaluation
3
0.875
0.886
0.000*
2
Component evaluation
5
0.902
0.908
0.000*
1
Process evaluation
6
0.939
0.847
0.000*
3
Output evaluation
3
0.916
0.748
0.000*
4
Outcome evaluation
4
0.901
0.717
-
5
* p-value less than 0.05
Table 3 shows that the findings of the
Confirmatory Factor Analysis model have t-values
larger than 1.96 and p-values less than 0.05,
indicating that all factors can be utilized to confirm
the model's accuracy (Figure 5).
Following is a list of the most significant factors
that have been identified to contribute to the
successful completion of the project, as determined
by the findings of the analysis: 1) Component
evaluation, which analyzes each component of the
project to determine how much of a contribution it
makes to the overall success of the endeavor; 2)
Input evaluation, which evaluates the readiness of
the project in terms of necessary resources; 3)
Process evaluation, which focuses on the activities
and techniques of the project from the beginning to
the end; and 4) Output evaluation, which examines
the results of the project. An assessment of the
project's results, which involves determining
whether or not the endeavor was successful in
accomplishing the goals it set out to accomplish
and generating the outputs that were envisioned; )
Outcome evaluation, which discusses the overall
results of the project and how they affect all
stakeholders; and 6) Context evaluation, which
examines the necessary needs for project planning
by taking into account external conditions and
anticipated problems.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1110
Volume 19, 2023
Table 4. Goodness of Fit for Measurement Model
Index
Acceptable Values
Statistical Values
p-value
≥ 0.05, [38]
.703
CMIN/DF
< 3.00, [39]
4.647 / 7 = 0.664
GFI
≥ 0.85, [40]
.988
AGFI
≥ 0.80, [40]
.964
NFI
≥ 0.80, [41]
.990
CFI
≥ 0.80, [42]
.999
TLI
≥ 0.80, [43]
.999
RMSEA
< 0.08, [44]
.000
Model Summary: Acceptable Model Fit
Remark: CMIN/DF = The ratio of the chi-square value to the degree of freedom, GFI = Goodness-of-fit index,
AGFI = Adjusted goodness-of-fit index, NFI = Normed fit index, CFI = Comparative fit index,
TLI = Tucker-Lewis index, and RMSEA = Root mean square error of approximation.
Fig. 6: Evaluation results of the business sales in the project
Table 4 shows that the empirical data and the
model are compatible with one another throughout
all of the indicators. As a direct result of the
requirements for testing developed by confirmatory
factor analysis, the model can, consequently, be
considered accurate.
Group 3: Government agencies and provincial-
level supporting organizations: A qualitative
analysis was used to evaluate the data provided by
public sector organizations and executives working
for local governments.
The following analysis diagram provides a
visual representation of the evaluation results of the
business sales in the project that executives from
the public sector and local government presented
(Figure 6).
The following is an explanation of the most
important aspects to consider while evaluating the
project, based on the image, arranged in decreasing
order of significance:
1) Entrepreneurs stand to gain a lot from
participating in this effort.
2) It gives business owners the ability to
broaden their sales channels to include Internet
platforms in addition to traditional retail outlets;
3) It assists business owners in the creation of
their content, which may include writing,
photographs, and media;
4) Representatives from the government and
officials at the local level think that this is a
fantastic concept;
5) This effort emphasizes the significance of
making sales on the Internet to business owners;
6) The procedure for the project is well-defined
and easy to understand;
7) The changes brought about by the digital era
are reflected in this project;
8) It is beneficial to the tourism industry of the
country;
9) It paves the way for long-term growth in all
aspects of society, including the economy and
environment;
10) The income of business owners is boosted
as a result.
5 Discussion of the Results
In direct response to the COVID-19 epidemic in
Thailand, numerous programs were launched to
support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
When an evaluation strategy has been implemented
to determine the outcome of anything, it is necessary
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1111
Volume 19, 2023
to take remedial action and launch new initiatives
similar to those already implemented. Since, [45],
states that "in the era of the global economy, SMEs
are recognized as a mechanism for sustainable
economic development," it is safe to say that this
project will continue to be successful for
entrepreneurs in the future and will help improve
distribution channels through the use of technology
and improved skills of entrepreneurs. In addition,
this project is likely to contribute to the growth of
the global economy. There are three main areas
where small and medium enterprises (SMEs) face
challenges: Environmental issues, global
competition, and technological improvements. Two
technological requirements for successful adaptation
in the small and medium enterprise (SME) sector in
today's globalized economy are the readiness of a
technologically skilled workforce within the
economic system and the identification of
opportunities for new technologies to compete
within the macroeconomic environment. Both are
prerequisites for successful technological adaptation.
A significant barrier to the success of community
enterprises, especially in developing countries, is the
need for access to education and economic
resources. Most entrepreneurs need more skills and
capital, [46]. According to [46], found that the main
obstacle is the need for adequate knowledge,
especially in technology and information systems,
which leads to delays in accessing and using digital
marketing. However, if entrepreneurs have a strong
drive, they will eventually be able to succeed in
community business.
Moreover, quantitative research shows that
process factors are most important from the
entrepreneurs' perspective. This is evident from the
relative importance of the various considerations.
According to [47], explained that this means that
projects follow a standard format, how they are
communicated, how long they last, how motivation
grows during the project, what tasks are completed,
and how success is determined. They pointed out
that evaluating project processes is an essential part
of a suitable evaluation tool, as it helps business
owners spot opportunities to improve processes in
subsequent projects. They also noted that reliable
assessment tools have commonalities.
Consideration of problem background is the least
important and least significant factor. Whether it is
the result of a pandemic or the current context of
fierce competition, it suggests that entrepreneurs
have yet to experience the impact on their business.
The results of the [48], study are consistent with the
technological changes that business leaders must
adapt to. They concluded that the evaluation
process used by SME owners with the dual purpose
of learning and quality control is a critical factor in
the success of SMEs. The second factor is the high
entry barrier when considering IT spending due to
the need for a more strategic vision and the
uncertainty of the long-term impact of such
investments on the business. The lack of education
is responsible for this hurdle.
According to [49], it was stated that
entrepreneurs should create a user-friendly menu
and have talent in developing effective media to
warn customers about the problems and obstacles
that the project will encounter. The willingness of
managers to use technology in their personal lives
and the commercial skills of small and medium-
sized enterprise (SME) managers are two broad
categories that can be used to classify essential
skills. According to the results of the research
conducted by [50], small and medium-sized
enterprises (SMEs) should be assessed against four
criteria using the development framework
developed for large organizations. The most
pressing problems are related to the availability of
human resources and the integration of new
technologies.
Another major problem for Internet businesses
is the sale of similar goods that are similar to
others. Therefore, new products should be created,
such as using technologies for processing food to
extend its shelf life. This is in line with the findings
of [51], who found that to be successful, one must
create products that are unique and have a faster
development and launch time. Consequently,
entrepreneurs are advised to pay particular attention
to how quickly they implement technologies that
give them an edge over their competitors.
The comprehensive and impartial evaluation of
initiatives is another intriguing issue. For instance,
they were assessing project outcomes by involving
stakeholders directly. In the past, the government
prioritized project efficacy based on its objectives
and the key performance indicators established by
its agencies. This approach occasionally lacked an
integrated view of the performance requirements of
stakeholders, which hindered real collaboration.
According to [52], confirmed that complete
collaboration between community enterprises, the
government, and the private sector in the execution
of any project leads to success, efficiency, and
effectiveness.
5.1 Recommendations for Policy
1. The government should study community-run
businesses to identify the most successful
businesspeople and encourage the growth of their
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1112
Volume 19, 2023
businesses to increase the capacity to produce
higher standard goods. This can be achieved by
providing grants or low-interest loans and frequent
evaluations after assistance is provided.
2. The government should have transparent and
consistent regulations to evaluate the effectiveness
of Internet marketing. These policies should focus
on the skills entrepreneurs must have or how to use
sophisticated technologies to grow their businesses
sustainably and profitably.
3. The government sector should work with the
Ministry of Commerce, provincial development
agencies, and local governments to ensure
transparency in assessing community businesses.
4. New and improved indicators are needed
superior to the CIPP model that represents project
performance on non-monetary factors. These
indicators should also reflect progress concerning
society, communities, and the environment.
5) The person responsible for the project from
the government sector should delegate the task to a
central agency or an external representative (or a
third party) to be responsible for evaluating the
performance of the project to reduce corruption,
promote transparency, and identify the real issues
that can be dealt with appropriately.
5.2 Recommendations for Community
Enterprises
1. Community businesses need to be made aware of
the problems that will arise from significant,
uncontrollable changes in the business
environment, and they need to respond quickly.
They will eventually have to go out of business if
they do not adapt.
2. Community businesses should improve their
offerings to satisfy consumers' shifting wants. They
should not market comparable goods. To make
their items stand out, they could want fresh
concepts.
3. Entrepreneurs must have a strong sense of self-
motivation because, with it, it is easier to succeed,
even with support from the public and private
sectors.
Acknowledgments:
This research was supported by the Science,
Research, and Innovation Promotion Funding
(TSRI) (Grant No. FRB650070/0168). This
research block grant was managed under
Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
(FRB65E0506K.4).
References:
[1] Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of
the CIPP evaluation model for educational
accountability. Journal of Research and
Development in Education, 5, 19-25.
[2] Ho, W. W., Chen, W. J., Ho, C. K., Lee, M.
B., Chen, C. C., & Chou, F. H. C. (2011).
Evaluation of the suicide prevention program
in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, using the CIPP
evaluation model. Community Mental Health
Journal, 47(5), 542-550.
[3] Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J.
(2007). Evaluation theory, models and
applications. Jossey-Bass.
[4] Chen, W., & Dai, F. (2021). Evaluation of
Talent Cultivation Quality of Modern
Apprenticeship Based on Context-Input-
Process-Product Model. International
Journal of Emerging Technologies in
Learning, 16(14).
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.24053
[5] Tuna, H., & Başdal, M. (2021). Curriculum
evaluation of tourism undergraduate
programs in Turkey: A CIPP model-based
framework. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure,
Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100324.
[6] Neyazi, N., Arab, M., Farzianpour, F., &
Majdabadi, M. M. (2016). Evaluation of
selected faculties at Tehran University of
Medical Sciences using CIPP model in
students' and graduates' point of view.
Evaluation and program planning, 59, 88-93.
[7] Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z.
(2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for
Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case
Study. Journal of Education and Educational
Development, 5(1), 189-206.
[8] Karatas, H., & Fer, S. (2009). Evaluation of
English curriculum at Yildiz Technical
University using CIPP model. Egitim ve
Bilim, 34(153), 47.
[9] Burke, E., & Hennessy, M. (2021).
Evaluation of an early career clinical
academic training programme using the CIPP
model. BMJ open, 11(11), e052965.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-
052965
[10] Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014).
Evaluation theory, models, and applications
(Vol. 50). John Wiley & Sons.
[11] Mair, J. and Schoen, O. (2007), Successful
social entrepreneurial business models in the
context of developing economies: An
explorative study, International Journal of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1113
Volume 19, 2023
Emerging Markets, 2(1), pp. 54-68.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17468800710718895
[12] Jennings, P., & Beaver, G. (1997). The
performance and competitive advantage of
small firms: a management perspective.
International small business journal, 15(2),
63-75.
[13] Pasanen, M. (2003). Multiple
entrepreneurships among successful SMEs in
peripheral locations. Journal of small
business and enterprise development,
10(4):418-425.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000310504729
[14] Pardalis, G., Mahapatra, K., & Mainali, B.
(2022, September). A business model canvas
framework for sustainable one-stop-shops. In
IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science, (1085, No. 1,
012048). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-
1315/1085/1/012048
[15] Maltz, A. C., Shenhar, A. J., & Reilly, R. R.
(2003). Beyond the balanced scorecard:
Refining the search for organizational
success measures. Long range planning,
36(2), 187-204.
[16] Napolitano, M. R., Marino, V., & Ojala, J.
(2015). In search of an integrated framework
of business longevity. Business History,
57(7), 955-69.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2014.9936
13
[17] Alaqeel, O. (2022). Impact of leadership
skills on entrepreneurs business success in
Saudi Arabia. Theses and Dissertations.
1247.
https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/1
247
[18] Galadanchi, H., & Bakar, L. J. (2018). A
study of factors that support longevity of
business enterprises. IOSR Journal of
Business and Management, 20(1), 53-59.
[19] Zajkowski, R., Safin, K., & Stańczyk, E.
(2022). The success factors of family and
non-family firms: Similarities and
differences. Entrepreneurial Business and
Economics Review, 10(3), 51-72.
https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100304
[20] Wronka, M. (2013). Analyzing the Success
of Social Enterprises Critical Success
Factors Perspective. Management, Knoeledge
and Learning International Conference 2013
pp. 593-602. Zadar, Croatia.
[21] Amato, C., Baron, R. A., Barbieri, B.,
Bélanger, J. J., & Pierro, A. (2017).
Regulatory modes and entrepreneurship: The
mediational role of alertness in small
business success. Journal of Small Business
Management, 55(sup1), 27–42.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12255
[22] Chaniago, H. (2022). The effect innovation
cloning to small business success:
entrepreneurial perspective. Journal of
Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 1-
18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-
00245-0. Epub 2022 Oct 5. PMID:
36211714; PMCID: PMC9532829.
[23] Al-Baghdadi, E. N., Alrub, A. A., & Rjoub,
H. (2021). Sustainable Business Model and
Corporate Performance: The Mediating Role
of Sustainable Orientation and Management
Accounting Control in the United Arab
Emirates. Sustainability, 13(16), 8947.
[24] Muhamad, S. F., Zain, F. A. M., Samad, N.
S. A., Rahman, A. H. A., & Yasoa, M. R.
(2022, November). Measuring Sustainable
Performance of Islamic Banks: Integrating
the Principles of Environmental, Social and
Governance (ESG) and Maqasid Shari’ah. In
IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science, 1102(1), p. 012080).
IOP Publishing.
[25] Lim, W. M. (2022). The sustainability
pyramid: A hierarchical approach to greater
sustainability and the United Nations
Sustainable Development Goals with
Implications for marketing theory, practice,
and public policy. Australasian Marketing
Journal, 30(2), 142-150.
https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211069152
[26] Yang, M., Jaafar, N., Al Mamun, A.,
Salameh, A. A., & Nawi, N. C. (2022).
Modelling the significance of strategic
orientation for competitive advantage and
economic sustainability: the use of hybrid
SEM–neural network analysis. Journal of
Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(44), 1-
28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-
00232-5
[27] Dollery, B., Crase, L., & Grant, B. (2011).
The local capacity, local community, and
local governance dimensions of sustainability
in Australian local government.
Commonwealth Journal of Local
Governance, (8/9), 162-183.
[28] Ngoc-Hong Duong. (2022). Relationship of
social sustainability, operational
performance, and economic performance in
sustainable supply chain management.
Global Business & Finance Review, 27(4),
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1114
Volume 19, 2023
46-64.
https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2022.27.4.46
[29] UN Global Compact Network Thailand,
(2022). Sustainability for everyone.
https://www.globalcompact-th.com/unite-
bulletin/detail/11 (Accessed Date:
13/10/2023)
[30] Chienwattanasook, K., Jarinto, K., & Sulong,
M. (2023). The Development of Community
Enterprise Entrepreneurs in the Crop
Production Sector for Entry into e-
Commerce. WSEAS Transactions on
Business and Economics, 20, 541-548.
https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.49
[31] Sastararuji, D., Hoonsopon, D., Pitchayadol,
P., & Chiwamit, P. (2022). Cloud accounting
adoption in Thai SMEs amid the COVID-19
pandemic: An explanatory case study.
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,
11(43), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-
022-00234-3
[32] Payogo, S. D., Phumphongkhochasorn, P.,
Songsraboon, R., & Thongtao, J. (2021). The
Development of a Large Schools
Management According to the King’s
Philosophy Model. Psychology and
Education Journal, 58(1), 1615-1621.
[33] Guritno, P. D., Suyono, H., & Sunarjo, S.
(2019). Competency Model of Social
Entrepreneurs: Learning from Successful
Indonesian Social Entrepreneurs.
International Journal of Research in
Business and Social Science, (2147- 4478),
8(3), pp.94–110.
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.256
[34] Bowers, B., Cohen, L. W., Elliot, A. E.,
Grabowski, D. C., Fishman, N. W., Sharkey,
S. S., ... & Kemper, P. (2013). Creating and
supporting a mixed methods health services
research team. Health Serv Res, 2013
Dec;48(6 Pt 2): 2157-80.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12118.
[35] Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2011).
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods
Research. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications.
[36] Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality
and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health
Sciences Research, 34, 1189-1208.
https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.955
[37] Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods:
A sourcebook. McGraw-Hill.
[38] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., &
Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data
Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed.).
Pearson Education.
[39] Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R.,
& Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data
Analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
[40] Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian
versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and
the Beck Depression Inventory-II:
Psychometric properties and discriminant
power. In M.A. Lange (Ed.), Leading-Edge
Psychological Tests and Testing Research
(pp. 27-50). Nova.
[41] Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring
KMS success: A re-specification of the
DeLone and McLean’s model. Information
and Management, 43(6), 728–739.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
[42] Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit
indexes in structural models. Psychological
Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[43] Sharma, G. P., Verma, R. C., & Pathare, P.
(2005). Mathematical modelling of infrared
radiation thin layer drying of onion slices.
Journal of Food Engineering, 71(3), 282–
286.
[44] Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L.,
Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J.,
Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016).
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the
crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of
Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40.
[45] Prasanna R, Jayasundara J, Naradda Gamage
SK, Ekanayake E, Rajapakshe P, Abeyrathne
G. (2019). Sustainability of SMEs in the
Competition: A Systemic Review on
Technological Challenges and SME
Performance. Journal of Open Innovation:
Technology, Market, and Complexity,
5(4):100.
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040100
[46] Sulong, M., Jarinto, K., & Chienwattanasook,
K. (2023). Income Generation Through
Online Marketing After the COVID-19 Crisis
in Community Enterprise, Wicker Products,
and Souvenirs. Journal of Namibian Studies,
33(2023), 2253–2270.
https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.619
[47] Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J., & Probert, D.
(2006). A tool to evaluate design
performance in SMEs. International Journal
of Productivity and Performance
Management, 55(3-4), 184–216.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610653192
[48] Love, P. E. D., & Irani, Z. (2004). An
exploratory study of information technology
evaluation and benefits management
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1115
Volume 19, 2023
practices of SMEs in the construction
industry. Information & Management, 42(1),
227-242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.011
[49] McLarty, R. (2000). Evaluating graduate
skills in SMEs: The value chain impact.
Journal of Management Development, 19(7),
615-628.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710010373287
[50] Costello, P., Sloane, A., & Moreton, R.
(2007). IT Evaluation Frameworks—Do
They Make a Valuable Contribution? A
Critique of Some of the Classic Models for
Use by SMEs. Electronic Journal of
Information Systems Evaluation, 10(1), 57-
64.
[51] Moreno-Moya, M., & Munuera-Aleman, J.
L. (2016). The differential effect of
development speed and launching speed on
new product performance: An analysis in
SMEs. Journal of Small Business
Management, 54(2), 750-770.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12170
[52] Gigauri, Iza & Damenia, Nino. (2020).
Cooperation between Social Entrepreneurs
and Government to Develop Solutions to
Social Problems. Business and Economic
Research, 10. 116. 10.5296/ber.v10i3.17383.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article Ghostwriting
Policy)
- Wasana Sinrungtam: Project administration,
Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology,
Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Writing
– original draft.
- Krisada Chienwattanasook: Supervision,
Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Analysis,
Validation, Investigation, Writing original
draft, Writing – review & editing.
- Chitralada Trisakhon: Data curation.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
This research was supported by the Science,
Research, and Innovation Promotion Funding
(TSRI) (Grant No. FRB650070/0168). This
research block grant was managed under
Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
(FRB65E0506K.4).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.e
n_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.103
Wasana Sinrungtam, Chitralada Trisakhon,
Krisada Chienwattanasook
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1116
Volume 19, 2023