Zeolitic Imidazolate/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite for Removal of Polystyrene
and 4-tert-butylphenol via Adsorption
DELİA TERESA SPONZA*, RUKİYE ÖZTEKİN
Department of Environmental Engineering,
Dokuz Eylül University,
Tınaztepe Campus, 35160 Buca/Izmir,
TURKEY
*Corresponding Author
Abstract: - Simultaneous removal of microplastics and endocrine disruptors was performed with high yields
using Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. Polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol were used to indicate the
microplastic and endocrine disruptors. Under optimal conditions for maximum yields, the matrix was as
follows: 1.5 mg/l Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite, 30 min adsorption time at a Zeolitic imidazolate
to Fe3O4 ratio of 1/1, and 6 mg/l individual polystyrene 4-tert-butylphenol concentrations. Under these
conditions, 99% and 98% removals were detected for polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol, respectively via
adsorption. An excellent reproducibility was found for Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite under steady-
state operational conditions. The FESEM analyses showed that Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite
diameter was around 30 nm at a Zeolitic imidazolate to Fe3O4 nanocomposite ratio of 1/1 while some larger
dodecahedral particles size was 300 nm. N2 adsorption–desorption measurements exhibited the porosity of
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite and the decrease of size is attributed to the incorporation of a
nonporous magnetic phase via the addition of Fe2+ to the nanocomposite. BET results showed a specific surface
area with a BET isotherm of 5000 m2/g, and a pore size of 30 nm for Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite. In the XRD spectra of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite, the structure of
nanocomposite was not changed by the addition of imidazolate and Fe3O4 nanocomposite. HRTEM analysis
indicated some crystal agglomerations by doping of zeolitic imidazolate to Fe3O4. The reusability of the
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was excellent even after 60 times utilization. The yields were 88%
and 85% after 60 runs while the nanocomposite was reused 20 times during runs with yields as high as 97%
and 98%.
Key-Words: - Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite; Polystyrene; 4-tert-butylphenol; Adsorption;
Microroplastics; Endocrine disruptors.
Received: May 29, 2023. Revised: August 9, 2023. Accepted: October 5, 2023. Published: October 17, 2023.
1 Introduction
Microplastics have been detected in rivers, deep
oceans, marine sediments, and the atmosphere, [1].
However, microplastics also have the ability to
adsorb other harmful organic pollutants and trace
metals, [2], [3], from the environment onto their
surface, resulting in the transportation of these
pollutants, [3]. As well as adsorbing pollutants from
the environment, microplastics can also release
other organic species including, plastic components
and additives such as endocrine disruptors
(bisphenol A and 4-tert-butylphenol) released
during the degradation process of waste plastics.
These plastic components/additives are themselves
environmental contaminants and present a risk to
humans as endocrine disruptors, [4]. The prevalence
of microplastic and its relationship with other
pollutants poses a risk to the environment as marine
life readily consumes microplastic causing harm
directly through physical interactions or by the
adsorbed toxins and bacteria, [5]. Microplastics are
consumed by humans via contaminated food and
drinks, or via breathing contaminated air, [6], [7].
Conventional methods for the removal of
microplastics have been reviewed extensively and
generally fall within three classes: physical
separation, chemical separation, and biological
separation, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].
4-tert-butylphenol is a representative alkylphenol
that has been widely used as an important raw
material in the chemical industry for the synthesis of
phenolic resins, fragrances, lubricants, pour-point
depressors, and demulsifying agents, [8]. During the
manufacturing and use process, a considerable
amount of 4-tert-butylphenol is released into the
environment, and thus this compound is frequently
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1071
Volume 19, 2023
detected at relatively high concentrations in
environmental media such as rivers, seawaters, and
aquatic animals, [8]. Even more, the concentration
of 4-tert-butylphenol may reach 6.7 μg/l in urine
samples collected from people painting their houses
with paint products, [8]. Laboratory toxicological
studies have shown that 4-tert-butylphenol could
cause endocrine disruption, morphologic,
functional, and behavioral anomalies, and metabolic
changes in exposed animals, [9]. For environmental
safety and human health, it is highly desirable to
develop a simple and efficient method to eliminate
4-tert-butylphenol from contaminated sites.
Microplastics and endocrine disruptors,
potentially threatening new types of pollutants, are
widely dispersed in water and can come into contact
with humans through tap water. Among the removal
processes of microplastics and endocrine disruptors
in water treatment plants coagulation is not
completely clear. Furthermore, polyaromatic carbon
(PAC) and FeCl3 coagulation were not very
effective in the removals of both pollutants studied,
[10].
Conventional methods for the removal of
microplastics have been reviewed extensively and
generally, the relevant 3 classes were not effective:
physical separation, chemical separation, and
biological separation, [11], [12], [13], [14], [15],
[16], [17]. Physical separation includes techniques
such as filtration, sedimentation, and density
flotation, [18]. These methods are often able to
achieve high removal efficiencies but suffer from
drawbacks such as high energy and material cost for
filtration due to membrane fouling, or
ineffectiveness against smaller particles (< 100 µm)
for sedimentation and flotation, [19], [20], [21].
Chemical separation techniques include coagulation
and flocculation and photodegradation, [22]. These
techniques can achieve high removal efficiency,
however, in the case of coagulation and
flocculation, they can also be inefficient for the
removal of smaller particles and those with a certain
shape, and in the case of photodegradation there is
an increased risk of releasing metabolite
contaminants in the environment, [23].
Biodegradation also exhibits lower efficiencies
since these pollutants are recalcitrant, [20], [21],
[22], [23].
Magnetic nanoparticles have emerged as an
alternative for the removal of microplastics, [24]. In
this method a magnetic sorbent is added to the
polluted water and the analyte is adsorbed by the
magnetic material which is then removed via an
external magnet. This method offers high
microplastic removal rates, simple implementation,
and highly efficient removal of smaller
microplastics, [25]. A range of nanomaterials has
been employed for the removal of microplastics and
endocrine disruptors with the most common type
being functionalized magnetic iron or iron oxide
nanoparticles, [26]. Other magnetic materials based
on biochar, zeolite can be also used. However, there
is a lack of magnetic nanomaterials that enable the
efficient and simultaneous removal of microplastics
and endocrine disruptors and their released small
organic molecule-based components/additives.
Zeolitic imidazolate compounds are porous
crystalline metal–organic framework materials made
up of tetrahedral metal nodes and imidazolate
linkers, [27]. Their high chemical and thermal
stability, large surface area, microporous structure,
and shape and pore size tunability make them
promising materials for a range of applications
including separations, [28], and catalysis, [29].
Amongst them, in the zeolytic amediazole the
relationships between Zn(II) and 2-methylimidazole
are well-known because of their adsorptive ability
and high stability, [30]. ZIF-8 synthesis can be
completed via a one-step, one-pot, room
temperature synthesis in an aqueous medium, from
cheap and low-toxic precursors and low crystal size
to increase adsorption efficiency for dyes and
pollutants, [31].
Magnetic metal–organic frameworks are
excellent materials for a range of applications, [32],
including the efficient extraction of environmental
pollutants, [33]. For example, magnetic have been
applied for the removal of diverse pollutants
including arsenic, [34], uranyl ions, [35], or organic
compounds like norfloxacin, [36]. The efficient
removal of organic pollutants from water has been
also enhanced by exploring the synergies of
magnetic with other materials, resulting in
composites such as Fe3O4-poly(styrenesulfonate) for
the removal of methyl orange, [35], or combining
magnetic ZIF-8 with amine-functionalized carbon
nanotubes for the removal of malachite green and
rhodamine B, [36].
Among various methods, adsorption is widely
used in wastewater treatment. Adsorption is usually
used as an advanced and terminal treatment for
residual small molecular pollutants in water.
Compared with other methods, adsorption has the
advantages of convenient operation, high
purification rate, low energy consumption, and low
cost, [32]. Studying the removal of microplastics
and endocrine disruptors in water by adsorption is of
practical value. Currently, several studies have been
conducted on the degradation of 4-tert-butylphenol
in aqueous solution, mainly including
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1072
Volume 19, 2023
biodegradation and photochemical methods, [8].
The treatment efficiency of biodegradation
technology is generally very low, and a relatively
long time period is needed for the complete removal
of 4-tert-butylphenol, [8]. The degradation
efficiency of 4-tert-butylphenol in UV, UV/H2O2,
and UV/S2O82– systems, and almost complete
removal was achieved in 4050 min in the two
Photo-Fenton-like processes. However, the
mineralization efficiency was not high, with only
30 % removal of the initial total organic carbon
(TOC) after 16 h of irradiation. It was reported that
during 4-tert-butylphenol degradation the
transformation metabolites were not removed
effectively, [30].
A Zeolitic imidazolate composite with Fe3O4
material for the simultaneous removal of small
molecule plastic components/additives and
microplastics and endocrine disruptors has not been
yet reported in detail.
Therefore, in this study a nanocomposite namely
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was
produced under laboratory conditions to remove a
microplastic (polystyrene) and an endocrine
disruptor chemical (4-tert-butylphenol) from
wastewaters. The effects of increasing amount of
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite
concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 4.0
mg/l) and increasing ratios of Zeolitic imidazolate to
Fe3O4 (1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4) and polystyrene and 4-tert-
butylphenol concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5,
3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 mg/l) at different pH (3.0, 7.0,
9.0 and 10.0) on the removals of polystyrene and 4-
tert-butylphenol was investigated. The
physicochemical analysis was performed by EDS,
Raman spectra, XRD, HRTEM, FESEM, N2
adsorption/desorption, and BET surface and pore
assays. The resusability of the nanocomposite was
investigated during 20 and 60 runs.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate/Fe3O4
Nanocomposite
2.1.1 Production of Zeolitic Imidazolate
In the preparation of Zeolitic imidazolate 5 ml
aqueous solutions of Zn(OAc)2.2H2O (0.6 g, 3.3
mmol) and 2-methylimidazole (2.24 g, 27.3 mmol)
were mixed at 25oC room temperature. The mixture
was incubated at 25oC for 24 h. The settled crystals
were collected via centrifugation at 4500 g for 30
min. The supernatant was discarded, then the
material was collected and washed with deionized
water and methanol. The solid mixture was dried for
12 h at 70oC.
2.1.2 Preparation of Fe3O4 Nanocomposite
5 g of Fe3O4 was mixed in 12 ml hexane and then
added to a solution of 50/50 acetonitrile/ethyl
acetate. 0.5 ml NaIO4 was added and the mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 1 h until the
particles moved to the aqueous layer. After the
addition of 80 ml of deionized water, the organic
compounds were decanted. The aqueous layer was
centrifuged and the supernatant was discarded and
the remaining solid particles were washed with
deionized water and ethanol.
2.2 Production of Zeolitic Imidazolate/Fe3O4
Nanocomposite
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was
prepared by mixing 5 ml of FeSO4.7H2O solution, 5
ml of Zn(OAc)2, and 5 ml of 2-methylimidazole.
The Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was
prepared This material was collected via an external
magnet and then washed with water and methanol
and was dried at 60oC overnight.
2.3 Physicochemical Analysis of Zeolitic
Imidazolate/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite
The morphology of the Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite was studied via a field emission
scanning electron microscope (FESEM). To
determine the particle structure of the
nanocomposite energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (EDS) and high-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM)
analyses were performed. Nitrogen adsorption–
desorption isotherms were obtained via a surface
area and porosity analyzer. The Brunauer-Emmett-
Teller (BET) method was used to calculate surface
area and pore size using experimental points.
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were
obtained using a diffractometer with a Co X-ray.
2.4 Preparation of Polystyrene Microplastic
and Its Removal
Samples of 1.1 µm polystyrene microsphere
solutions (10 ml) with a concentration of 25 mg/l or
50 mg/l were added to a 20 ml glass vial with
increasing amount of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 4.0
mg/l) and increasing ratios of Zeolitic imidazolate to
Fe3O4 (1/1, 1/2, 1/3 and 1/4) and polystyrene
concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0
and 6.0 µg/l). The samples were stirred at a rpm of
700 rpm for 60 min. The microplastics/Zeolitic
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1073
Volume 19, 2023
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite aggregates were
removed from the samples via an external
neodymium magnet. The efficiency of the removal
of polystyrene was monitored.
2.5 Preparation of 4-tert-butylphenol and Its
Removal
A 200 mg/l solution of the 4-tert-butylphenol was
prepared by dilution of the stock solutions with
water. 10 ml of 2 mg/l 4-tert-butylphenol was mixed
with increasing Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 4.0
mg/l) concentrations and increasing Zeolitic
imidazolate to Fe3O4 ratios (1/1, 1/2, 1/3 and 1/4).
The samples were mixed at increasing speeds (400,
1000, 1500, 3000, 5000, and 7000 rpm), at
increasing times (1.0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min). The
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was
removed from the samples via an external magnet,
and samples were passed through a 0.45 µm
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter prior
to analysis.
2.6 Analytical Procedures
4-tert-butylphenol concentrations were determined
via high-performance liquid chromatography -
ultraviolet spectroscopy (HPLC-UV) using a
Dionex 120 silica-C18 4.6 × 150 mm column with a
particle size of 5 µm, with a 4.6 × 10 mm guard
column. A detection wavelength of 280 nm was
used. Removal efficiency was determined via a
comparison of 4-tert-butylphenol before and after
extraction.
Polystyrene measurements were performed in a
UV spectrophotometer, following the decrease of
the turbidity by the forming of the settled colloidal
polystyrene at a wavelength of 500 nm.
Iron and zinc content in the prepared
nanocomposite were determined using a Varian
atomic absorption spectrometer equipped with iron
and zinc hollow cathode ray neon-filled lamps.
2.7 Assays for Simultaneous Removal of
Polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol
Simultaneous removal of polystyrene microplastic
and 4-tert-butylphenol was carried out in a solution
with a volume of 40 ml containing 40 mg/l of
polystyrene microplastic and 4 mg/l of 4-tert-
butylphenol. Dry samples were dispersed in 1 ml
acetonitrile and sonicated for 5 seconds. Acetonitrile
was decanted (materials held via a magnet) and the
material was washed with 5 ml of deionized water
before the pollutant sample was added.
3 Results and Discussions
3.1 FESEM Analysis Results
FESEM analyses exhibited that the produced
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite diameter
was around 145 nm at a Zeolitic imidazolate to
Fe3O4 nanocomposite ratio of 1/1 the produced
nanocomposite exhibited dodecahedral particles
with a size of 100 nm in diameter (Figure 1a).
Furthermore, some larger dodecahedral particles
300 nm in diameter were also observed (Figure 1b).
This indicates the doping of Fe3O4 with the 2-
methylimidazole for Zn2+ binding sites, terminating
with a crystal structure. The presence of larger
crystals can be attributed to an insufficient bonding
of the Fe3O4. To overcome this, the ratio of Zeolitic
imidazolate to Fe3O4 nanocomposite in the
nanocomposite was increased. With a ratio of 1/2, a
significant decrease in the larger crystals was
detected (Figure 1c). The bigger dodecahedral
nanoparticles in the Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite decreased at a Zeolitic imidazolate
to Fe3O4 ratio of 1/4 compared with large (Figure
1d) nanoparticles.
(a)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1074
Volume 19, 2023
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 1: FESEM analysis results in (a) Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with a size of
300 nm, (b) nanoparticles 800 nm, (c) Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with a Zeolitic
imidazolate to Fe3O4 ratio of 1/3 and (d) Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with a Zeolitic
imidazolate to Fe3O4 ratio of 1/4.
3.2 N2 AdsorptionDesorption
Measurements
The porosity of the Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite was investigated with N2
adsorption–desorption measurements. Sharp
increases in adsorption at lower relative pressures
were detected in the isotherms of Zeolitic
imidazolate and Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite indicating the presence of
micropores (Figure 2), and they were small. This
decrease in the size is attributed to the incorporation
of a nonporous magnetic phase, via the addition of
Fe2+ to the Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite. An increase in elevated relative
pressures during adsorption indicates the possible
presence of interparticle mesopores and micropores
in the structure of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite. The smaller crystal size in this
nanocomposite indicates the presence of new larger
pores due to nanoparticle agglomeration.
Fig. 2: Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of
Zeolitic imidazolate and zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite.
3.3 BET Analyses Results
The specific surface area obtained based on the BET
isotherm which is accounted as 5000 m2/g, and the
pore size of the zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite was 30 nm. It was found that
Zeolitic imidazolate has a low BET isotherm area
(2800 m2/g) and high pore size (140 nm) (Table 1
and Figure 3).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1075
Volume 19, 2023
Table 1. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis
results
S BET
(m2/g)
Mean pore
diameter (nm)
5000
130
2800
30
Fig. 3: BET analysis results for Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite (blue circle) and
Zeolitic imidazolate (red circle).
3.4 XRD Analysis Results
In the XRD spectra of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite peaks can be seen at = 7.90o,
10.80o, 12.20o, 14.60o, 16.90o and 18.90o,
respectively. These peaks correspond to planes of
(112), (204), (216), (225) and (318), respectively
(Figure 4). These data showed that the structure of
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was not
changed by the addition of imidazole and Fe3O4.
Peaks at 30.90o, 35.80o, 43.90o, 53.20o, 58.00o and
62.60o, respectively, can be attributed to planes of
(223), (318), (406), (429), (514) and (446),
respectively (Figure 4). The presence of weaker
diffraction bands that correspond to the
incorporation of zinc ferrite into the Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was detected.
Fig. 4: XRD patterns of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite at different planes
3.5 Raman Analysis Results
In Figure 5, the Raman spectrum was recorded for a
superstructure obtained for Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. Finally,
topography investigations of the heights of objects
by AFM led to a mean value of 130 nm and a profile
in perfect agreement with the channel diameter for a
nanocomposite. This indicates the superstructures of
the nanocomposite do not collapse when they are
released from the matrix.
Fig. 5: Raman spectra of Zeolitic imidazolate and
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite.
3.6 HRTEM Analysis Results
Examination of superstructures at the single object
level using high-resolution transition electronic
microscopy confirmed the doping of zeolitic
imidazolate to form some agglomerations by
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1076
Volume 19, 2023
intergrown crystals. The diameter of the
nanocomposite varied between 110 nm (Figure 6a)
and 130 nm (Figure 6b).
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6: HRTEM analysis in Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with (a) small and
(b) large diameter
3.7 EDS Spectra Results
To clarify the elemental distribution, EDS was used
in an individual Zeolitic imidazolate particle. Figure
7 shows that the elemental composition of the
Zeolitic imidazolate consists of Zn, N, and, C. These
metals were dispersed evenly in the shell layer
(Figure 7). In the Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite, Fe and O can be ascribed to Fe3O4
with Zn, N, and C (Figure 8). The presence of a
small amount of oxygen atoms can be due to the
presence of some water molecules encapsulated in
the nanocomposite cavities.
It can be concluded that the Zeolitic imidazolate
has an outer layer coated with the inner part of
Fe3O4 and distributed homogeneously on the crystal
nanocomposite structure.
Fig. 7: C, N, and Zn distributions in the Zeolitic
imidazolate
Fig. 8: C, N, O, Fe, Co, and Zn distributions in the
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite
3.8 FESEM Analysis Results
In Figure 9a and Figure 9b, the FESEM image
shows the morphology of the selected polystyrene
microspheres in detail. The dried pure microplastics
used are uniform in their shape and size with a mean
diameter of 100 nm for Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite and 33 nm for Zeolitic imidazolate
(Figure 9a and Figure 9b). The particles were tightly
packed on the surface of the spheres. FESEM
images of the aggregate were magnetically removed
after microplastic extraction. This clearly shows that
the magnetic nanocomposite particles and the
polystyrene beads can be seen embedded in the
aggregates.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1077
Volume 19, 2023
(a)
(b)
Fig. 9: FESEM images of (a) Zeolitic imidazolate
and (b) Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite.
3.9 Effects of Zeolitic Imidazolate/Fe3O4
Nanocomposite Concentrations on the
Removals of Polystyrene and 4-tert-
butylphenol
Increasing Zeolitic Imidazolate/Fe3O4
Nanocomposite (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0)
and increasing Zeolitic imidazolate to Fe3O4 ratios
(1/1, 1/2, 1/3 and 1/4) concentrations were prepared.
The samples were mixed at increasing speeds (400,
1000, 1500, 3000, 5000 and 7000 rpm) and at
increasing times (1.0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 min).
The effect of the catalyst’s concentration
experiments was carried out by taking different
amounts of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0
mg/l) concentrations to detect the optimum
operational conditions for maximum polystyrene
and 4-tert-butylphenol yields. The polystyrene and
4-tert-butylphenol concentrations were kept constant
at 4 mg/l.
The removal efficiency increased from 65%-70%
up to 96% and 97% in both pollutants as the
nanocomposite concentration was increased from
0.5 to 1.5 mg/l (Table 2). Further, the increase of the
nanocomposite did not elevate the yields in both
pollutants. Beyond 2.0-2.5 mg/l Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite dose for the
available pollutant molecules may not be sufficient
for adsorption by the increased number of Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. Hence, the
additional catalyst powder did not elevate the
catalysis activity of nanocomposite and the rate does
not increase with an increase in the amount of
catalyst. At higher nanocomposite concentrations,
the particles may aggregate, which reduces the
interfacial area between the reaction solution and
the photocatalyst. Thus, the number of active sites
on the catalyst surface effectively decreases. The
surplus addition of nanocomposite makes the
solution more turbid and the reduction in
degradation efficiency may be due to the scattering
of light with a surplus amount of Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. 1.5 mg/l of
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was
found to be the optimum catalyst concentration for
maximum degradation of 4 mg/l polystyrene and 4-
tert-butylphenol concentrations.
Table 2. Effect of increasing Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite concentrations on
the removal yields of polystyrene and 4-tert-
butylphenol
Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite dose
(mg/l)
Polystyrene
removal
efficiency
(%)
4-tert-
butylphenol
removal
efficiency (%)
0.5
67
70
1.0
87
88
1.5
99
98
2.0
98
97
2.5
97
96
3.0
97
97
4.0
96
96
3.10 Effects of Increasing Polystyrene and 4-
tert-butylphenol Concentrations on Their
Removal Yields
The rate of degradation is found to increase with
increasing concentration of individual polystyrene
and 4-tert-butylphenol concentrations from 2 mg/l
up to 6 mg/l. Further increase in pollutant
concentration decreases the rate of degradation
(Table 3). On the initial increase of the
concentration of polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol;
the reaction rate increases as more molecules of the
pollutant are available for degradation. However,
with a further increase of polystyrene and 4-tert-
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1078
Volume 19, 2023
butylphenol concentration, the solution becomes
more intense, and the turbidity increases. Under
these conditions, the path length of photons entering
the solution is decreased thereby fewer photons are
able to reach the catalyst surface. Hence, less
production of hydroxyl (OH) and superoxide (O2
) radicals leads to a reduction in photodegradation
efficiency. Moreover, at higher polystyrene and 4-
tert-butylphenol concentrations (7, 10 mg/l) the
number of collisions between pollutant molecules
increases whereas the number of collisions between
pollutant molecules and OH radical decreases.
Consequently, the rate of reaction is retarded.
Therefore, the optimized individual polystyrene and
4-tert-butylphenol concentrations should not be
more than 6 mg/l for maximum yields.
Table 3. Effects of increasing polystyrene and 4-
tert-butylphenol concentrations on their removal
yields at 1.5 mg/l Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite.
Polystyrene
concentration (mg/l)
2
3
4
5
6
7
Polystyrene yield (%)
67
73
79
83
99
95
4-tert-butylphenol
concentration (mg/l)
2
3
4
5
6
7
4-tert-butylphenol yield
(%)
66
72
80
84
99
93
The adsorption of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite onto polystyrene and 4-tert-
butylphenol is proposed to be due to hydrophobic
interactions between the pollutants and the
hydrophobic surface of the Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite to the 2-
methylimidazole. The larger size in the Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite provides the
available effective surface for interaction with the
dispersed pollutants. The improvements in the
removal efficiency were attributed mainly to the
optimum particle size of the Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with a size of 30
nm, leading to a larger effective area of interaction
between the nanocomposite crystals and the
polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol.
3.11 Effect of pH Values on the Yields of
Polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol Removal
Yields
The pH was adjusted from 3.0 up to 10.0 to detect
the effect of pH on the photodegradation of
microplastic and endocrine-disrupting samples. At
neutral pH, the polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol
had the highest adsorption capacity to the Zeolitic
imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite (Table 4). At high
pH values and acidic conditions, the nanocomposite
adsorbed, substantially fewer pollutants were
removed and the adsorption capacity decreased due
to the formation of acidic and alkaline containing
groups on the surface of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite. Under these conditions, the
hydrophobicity and the hydrophobic interaction
between nanocomposite and pollutants was lowered.
The hydrophobicity of both nanocomposite and
pollutants was less affected under alkaline
conditions compared to acidic conditions.
Table 4. Effect of pH variations on the pollutant
yields
Pollutants
pH values
3.0
7.0
9.0
10.0
Polystyrene yield (%)
76
99
69
53
4-tert-butylphenol yield (%)
77
98
60
49
3.12 The Effect of Time on the Polystyrene
and 4-tert-butylphenol Removal Yields
The effect of the time on the pollutant removal
efficiencies was studied in the range of 10, 20, 30,
and 40 min. As shown in Table 5, the pollutant
removals increased as the time was increased to 30
min. Removal efficiency reached a maximum after
30 min at 4 mg/l individual polystyrene and 4-tert-
butylphenol concentrations. The maximum yields
were 99% and 98% for polystyrene and 4-tert-
butylphenol, respectively.
Table 5. Effect of time on the removals of pollutants
Pollutants
Time (min)
10
20
30
40
Polystyrene yield (%)
70
80
99
53
4-tert-butylphenol yield (%)
77
82
98
49
3.13 Effect of Temperature on the Yields of
Polystyrene and 4-tert-butylphenol Removal
Yields
In this study, the temperature was increased from 25
to 60oC to detect the performances. At high
temperatures (70 and 100oC) the yields increased to
100% (data not shown). Since the studies were
detected at 25oC room temperature and the pollutant
yields (98%-99%) were satisfactory no studies in
detail were conducted with high temperatures since
high temperatures cause excess spending and
elevate the treatment cost.
3.14 Recovery Zeolitic Imidazolate/Fe3O4
Nanocomposite
The nanocomposite with a concentration of 1.5 mg/l
was used 21 times to detect its reuse efficiency.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1079
Volume 19, 2023
After 21 runs the nanocomposite was recovered
with high yields (97% and 95%) (Table 6). It can be
used more than 60 times with yields varying
between 87% and 84%.
Table 6. Reusability of Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite
Runs
Pollutants Yields
Polystyrene yield
(%)
4-tert-butylphenol yield
(%)
1
99
99
2
99
99
3
99
99
4
99
99
5
99
99
6
99
99
7
99
99
8
99
99
9
99
99
10
99
99
11
99
99
12
99
99
13
99
99
14
99
99
15
99
99
16
99
99
17
99
99
18
99
99
19
99
99
20
99
98
21
97
95
50
90
90
55
88
87
60
87
84
4 Conclusion
In this research, Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4
nanocomposite crystals were prepared under
laboratory conditions with a simple cost-effective
method and environmentally friendly process. At
high Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite
concentration, the polystyrene and 4-tert-
butylphenol removals decreased. Time and
nanocomposite loading both increased removal
efficiency before reaching optimal values. The
optimal nanocomposite concentrations were
detected at 1.5 mg/l at a Zeolitic imidazolate to
Fe3O4 nanocomposite ratio of 1/4 after 30 min for 6
mg/l pollutant concentrations. It was detected that
the Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite
exhibited excellent removal efficiencies for
microplastic and endocrine disruptors. The magnetic
removal of microplastics and endocrine disruptors
lowered the separation cost.
Zeolitic imidazolate/Fe3O4 nanocomposite
exhibited high performance for the fast and efficient
removal of microplastic and endocrine disruptors.
This can be attributed to the synergistic effects of
imidazolate and Fe3O4 including π-π and
electrostatic interactions during adsorption of
pollutants.
Acknowledgement:
This research study was undertaken in the
Environmental Microbiology Laboratories at Dokuz
Eylül University Engineering Faculty
Environmental Engineering Department, İzmir,
Turkey. The authors would like to thank this body
for providing financial support.
References:
[1] K.S. Park, Z. Ni, A.P. Côté, J.Y. Choi, R.
Huang, F.J. Uribe-Romo, H.K. Chae, M.
O’Keeffe, O.M. Yaghi, Exceptional chemical
and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate
frameworks, Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, Vol.103, 2006, pp. 10186–10191.
[2] H. Wu, W. Zhou, T. Yildirim, Hydrogen
storage in a prototypical zeolitic imidazolate
framework-8, Journal of the American
Chemical Society, Vol.129, 2007, pp. 5314–
5315.
[3] J. Tian, A. Morozan, M.T. Sougrati, M.
Lefèvre, R. Chenitz, J.-P. Dodelet, D. Jones,
F. Jaouen, Optimized synthesis of Fe/N/C
cathode catalysts for PEM fuel cells: A matter
of iron—ligand coordination strength,
Angewandte Chemie International Edition,
Vol.52, 2013, pp. 6867–6870.
[4] K. Strickland, E. Miner, Q. Jia, U. Tylus, N.
Ramaswamy, W. Liang, M.-T. Sougrati, F.
Jaouen, S. Mukerjee, Highly active oxygen
reduction non-platinum group metal
electrocatalyst without direct metal-nitrogen
coordination, Nature Communications, Vol.6,
2015, pp. 7343.
[5] H.M. Barkholtz, L. Chong, Z.B. Kaiser, T.
Xu, D.J. Liu, Highly active non-PGM
catalysts prepared from metal organic
frameworks, Catalysts, Vol.5, 2015, pp. 955–
965.
[6] J. Herranz, F. Jaouen, M. Lefèvre, U.I.
Kramm, E. Proietti, J.-P. Dodelet, P.
Bogdanoff, S. Fiechter, I. Abs-Wurmbach, P.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1080
Volume 19, 2023
Bertrand, T.M. Arruda, S. Mukerjee,
Unveiling N-protonation and anion-binding
effects on Fe/N/C catalysts for O2 reduction in
proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells,
Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Vol.115,
2011, pp. 16087–16097.
[7] N. Larouche, R. Chenitz, M. Lefèvre, E.
Proietti, J.P. Dodelet, Activity and stability in
proton exchange membrane fuel cells of iron-
based cathode catalysts synthesized with
addition of carbon fibers, Electrochimica
Acta, Vol.115, 2014, pp. 170–182.
[8] A.V. Barse, T. Chakrabarti, T.K. Ghosh, A.K.
Pal, S.B. Jadhao, One-tenth dose of LC50 of
4-tert-butylphenol causes endocrine
disruption and metabolic changes in Cyprinus
carpio, Pesticide Biochemistry and
Physiology, Vol.86, No.3, 2006, pp. 172-179.
[9] L. Yang, N. Larouche, R. Chenitz, G. Zhang,
M. Lefèvre, J.-P. Dodelet, Activity,
performance, and durability of for the
reduction of oxygen in PEM fuel cells, of
Fe/N/C electrocatalysts obtained from the
pyrolysis of metal-organic-framework and
iron porphyrin precursors, Electrochimica
Acta, Vol.159, 2015, pp. 184–197.
[10] G. Wu, K. Artyushkova, M. Ferrandon, A.J.
Kropf, D. Myers, P. Zelenay, Performance
durability of polyaniline-derived non-precious
cathode catalysts, Transactions of the
Electrochemical Society, Vol.25, 2009, pp.
1299–1311.
[11] V. Goellner, C. Baldizzone, A. Schuppert,
M.T. Sougrati, K. Mayrhofer, F. Jaouen,
Degradation of Fe/N/C catalysts upon high
polarization in acid medium, Physical
Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol.16, 2014,
pp. 18454–18462.
[12] U.I. Kramm, M. Lefèvre, N. Larouche, D.
Schmeisser, J.P. Dodelet, Correlations
between mass activity and physicochemical
properties of Fe/N/C catalysts for the ORR in
PEM fuel cell via 57Fe Mössbauer
spectroscopy and other techniques, Journal of
the American Chemical Society, Vol.136,
2013, pp. 978–985.
[13] A. Morozan, M.T. Sougrati, V. Goellner, D.
Jones, L. Stievano, F. Jaouen, Effect of
furfuryl alcohol on metal organic framework-
based Fe/N/C electrocatalysts for polymer
electrolyte membrane fuel cells,
Electrochimica Acta, Vol.119, 2014, pp. 192–
205.
[14] W. Xia, J. Zhu, W. Guo, L. An, D. Xia, R.
Zou, Well-defined carbon polyhedrons
prepared from nano metal-organic
frameworks for oxygen reduction, Journal of
Materials Chemistry A, Vol.2, 2014, pp.
11606–11613.
[15] L. Zhang, Z. Su, F. Jiang, L. Yang, J. Qian,
Y. Zhou, W. Li, M. Hong, Highly graphitized
nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanopolyhedra
derived from ZIF-8 nanocrystals as efficient
electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction
reactions, Nanoscale, Vol.6, 2014, pp. 6590–
6602.
[16] J. Cravillon, S. Münzer, S.-J. Lohmeier, A.
Feldhoff, K. Huber, M. Wiebcke, Rapid
room-temperature synthesis and
characterization of nanocrystals of a
prototypical zeolitic imidazolate framework,
Chemistry of Materials, Vol.21, 2009, pp.
1410–1412.
[17] D. Zacher, R. Nayuk, R. Schweins, R.A.
Fischer, K. Huber, Monitoring the
coordination modulator shell at MOF
nanocrystals, Crystal Growth & Design,
Vol.14, 2014, pp. 4859–4863.
[18] M. Sindoro, N. Yanai, A.-J. Jee, S. Granick,
Colloidal-sized metal organic frameworks:
synthesis and applications, Accounts of
Chemical Research, Vol.47, 2014, pp. 459–
469.
[19] X. Fan, W. Wang, W.; Li, J. Zhou, B. Wang,
J. Zheng, X. Li, Highly porous ZIF-8
nanocrystals prepared by a surfactant
mediated method in aqueous solution with
enhanced adsorption kinetics, ACS Applied
Materials & Interfaces, Vol.6, 2014, pp.
14994–14999.
[20] S. Diring, S. Furukawa, Y. Takashima, T.
Tsuruoka, S. Kitagawa, Controlled multiscale
synthesis of porous coordination polymer in
nano/micro regimes, Chemistry of Materials,
Vol.22, 2010, pp. 4531–4538.
[21] K. Kida, M. Okita, K. Fujita, S. Tanaka, Y.
Miyake, Formation of high crystalline ZIF-8
in an aqueous solution, CrystEngComm,
Vol.15, 2013, pp. 1794–1801.
[22] T. Tsuruoka, S. Furukawa, Y. Takashima, K.
Yoshida, S. Isoda, S. Kitagawa, Nanoporous
nanorods fabricated by coordination
modulation and oriented attachment growth,
Angewandte Chemie International Edition,
Vol.48, 2009, pp. 4739–4743.
[23] J. Cravillon, R. Nayuk, S. Springer, A.
Feldhoff, K. Huber, M. Wiebcke, Controlling
zeolitic imidazolate framework nano- and
microcrystal formation: Insight into crystal
growth by time-resolved in situ static light
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1081
Volume 19, 2023
scattering, Chemistry of Materials, Vol.23,
No.8, 2011, pp. 2130–2141.
[24] Y. Pan, Y. Liu, G. Zeng, L. Zhao, Z. Lai,
Rapid synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate
framework-8 (ZIF-8) nanocrystals in an
aqueous system, Chemical Communications,
Vol.47, 2011, pp. 2071–2073.
[25] V. Goellner, V. Armel, A. Zitolo, E. Fonda,
F. Jaouen, Degradation by hydrogen peroxide
of metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts for oxygen
reduction, Journal of the Electrochemical
Society, Vol.162, 2015, pp. H403–H414.
[26] S. Yuan, J.-L. Shui, L. Grabstanowicz, C.
Chen, S. Commet, B. Reprogle, T. Xu, L. Yu,
D.-J. Liu, A highly active and support-free
oxygen reduction catalyst prepared from
ultrahigh-surface-area porous polyporphyrin,
Angewandte Chemie International Edition,
Vol.52, 2013, pp. 1–6.
[27] N. Cheng, L. Ren, X. Xu, Y. Du, S.X. Dou,
Recent development of zeolitic imidazolate
frameworks (ZIFs) derived porous carbon
based materials as electrocatalysts, Advanced
Energy Materials, Vol.8, 2018, pp. 1801257.
[28] G. Zhong, D. Liu, J. Zhang, The application
of ZIF-67 and its derivatives: Adsorption,
separation, electrochemistry and catalysts,
Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Vol.6,
2018, pp. 1887–1899.
[29] Y. Liu, H. Cheng, M. Cheng, Z. Liu, D.
Huang, G. Zhang, B. Shao, Q. Liang, S. Luo,
T. Wu, The application of zeolitic imidazolate
frameworks (ZIFs) and their derivatives based
materials for photocatalytic hydrogen
evolution and pollutants treatment, Chemical
Engineering Journal, Vol.417, 2021, pp.
127914.
[30] A. Phan, C.J. Doonan, F.J. Uribe-Romo, C.B.
Knobler, M. O’keeffe, O.M. Yaghi,
Synthesis, structure, and carbon dioxide
capture properties of zeolitic imidazolate
frameworks, Accounts of Chemical Research,
Vol.43, 2010, pp. 58–67.
[31] N. Hassan, A. Shahat, A. El-Didamony, M.
El-Desouky, A. El-Bindary, Synthesis and
characterization of ZnO nanoparticles via
zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 and its
application for removal of dyes, Journal of
Molecular Structure, Vol.1210, 2020, pp.
128029.
[32] N. Zhang, T. Zhou, M. Chen, H. Feng, R.
Yuan, W. Yan, Y. Tian, X. Wu, W. Chu, C.
Wu, High-purity pyrrole-type FeN4 sites as a
superior oxygen reduction electrocatalyst,
Energy and Environmental Sciences, 2020,
Vol.13, pp. 111–118.
[33] X.C. Huang, Y.Y. Lin, J.P. Zhang, X.M.
Chen, Ligand-directed strategy for zeolite-
type metal-organic frameworks: Zinc (II)
imidazolates with unusual zeolitic topologies,
Angewandte Chemie International Edition,
Vol.45, 2006, pp. 1557–1559.
[34] S.R. Venna, J.B. Jasinski, M.A. Carreon,
Structural evolution of zeolitic imidazolate
framework-8, Journal of the American
Chemical Society, Vol.132, 2010, pp. 18030–
18033.
[35] R. Banerjee, A. Phan, B. Wang, C. Knobler,
H. Furukawa, M. O’Keeffe, O.M.; Yaghi,
High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic
imidazolate frameworks and application to
CO2 capture, Science, Vol.319, 2008, pp.
939–943.
[36] R. Banerjee, H. Furukawa, D. Britt, C.
Knobler, M. O’Keeffe, O.M. Yaghi, Control
of pore size and functionality in isoreticular
zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and their
carbon dioxide selective capture properties,
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
Vol.131, 2009, pp. 3875–3877.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
Prof. Dr. Delia Teresa Sponza and Post-Dr. Rukiye
Öztekin took an active role in every stage of the
preparation of this article.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
This research study was undertaken in the
Environmental Microbiology Laboratories at Dokuz
Eylül University Engineering Faculty
Environmental Engineering Department, İzmir,
Turkey. The authors would like to thank this body
for providing financial support.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.101
Deli
a Teresa Sponza, Ruki
ye Özteki
n
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
1082
Volume 19, 2023