
to wind-driven rain (WDR). Semi-empirical
equations have been proposed in the literature to
compute the amount of wind-driven rain (WDR)
incident on a wall.
The amount of WDR, for a selected rainy
period, could be calculated using a semi-empirical
approach of the ISO model, [18], which is based on
the physical correlation of WDR, wind speed, and
horizontal rain (Rwdr = α. U10 . (Rℎ) 0.88 . cos θ -
where α is the WDR coefficient, U10 is the wind
speed measured 10 m above the ground (m/s), Rh is
the horizontal rainfall intensity (mm) and θ is the
angle between the wind direction and the normal to
the building facade; α, is computed as α
=0.222.CR.CT.O.W - where CR and CT are the
roughness and topography coefficients, respectively,
while O is the obstruction factor and W is the wall
factor. CR is calculated on the basis of height above
the ground (z) and the minimum height (zmin)
parameters).
In another approach the WDR load, IWDR
(kg/m2s), at building facades, can be obtained by
multiplying the horizontal rainfall intensity Ih
(kg/m2 s) by a parameter η (IWDR=Ih× η (θ, Uref, Ih),
where η is a function of the angle θ (°) between
reference wind direction and orientation of the wall,
reference wind speed Uref (m/s) and Ih, all obtained
from meteorological data, [19], [20]. That parameter
η could be obtained from measurements, empirical
relations, or numerical simulations. Moisture
presence caused by WDR can negatively affect the
durability of building facades due to degradation of
surface material, cracking (especially relevant for
larger crack width, and interior damage, [17]. And
considering some of the variables involved in the
computation of WDR, particularly related to
geographical localization of the buildings, it could
be inferred that the local implantation of the
building probably should condition the potential use
of UPV testing, being more useful in case of severe
environmental conditions that propitiates the
formation of cracking, as well as water penetration
through that cracking.
In the evaluation of the risk of water penetration
across the existing cracking in the envelope of a
building, specifically should be assessed the extent
of facade area affected by the cracks, the cracking
patterns and the maximum width of the cracks.
If there are only very slight cracks in the URM
infill wall (crack width less than 0.1 mm), the sheet
of constant and uniform runoff water passes through
them without penetrating them, and the portion to be
absorbed by the walls is foremost due to the
capillarity of the constituent materials of the wall. In
these cases, the wind associated with the incident
rain acts on the wall creating a pressure difference
between the wall and the sheet of runoff water, [16].
Thus, this sheet is, by this effect, forced to penetrate
the wall; the most significant portion of the water
migration to the interior of the wall is then
processed through cracks with significant crack
width (greater than 0.1 mm), through which the
sheet of runoff water passes in its downward
trajectory. These cracks are most often located in
the area of vertical and horizontal mortar joints. It
should be noted that, at the end of the precipitation
period (rain), a considerable part of the moisture
absorbed by the surface layer of the wall evaporates
through a drying process, the speed of which
depends on the climatic conditions (temperature,
wind, relative humidity of ambient air). In case of
elements of the building envelope of solid material
such as solid bricks (non-perforated bricks) or
concrete, generally the presence of humidity in the
very small voids of the solid material, possibly,
increases the speed of propagation of ultrasound in
relation to the correspondent values of the dry
material, considering that the path of longitudinal
waves has less alterations that in case of dry
material. And, regarding the use of UPV testing for
detection of cracks in these solid materials, the
presence of humidity in the cracks can lead to
misleading results in what concern the detection of
these cracks and the estimation of their depth.
Therefore, it is important to study more deeply the
applicability of UPV testing for the accessing the
cracks filled with humidity.
In case of building vertical envelope with
absence of defects or pores larger than 1 mm, the
pressure difference across the facade (difference of
indoor and outdoor wind pressure) is the most
sensitive factor related to water penetration,
regardless of the existing water supply, [21].
However, in case of building vertical envelope with
defects, pores, or larger cracks (>5 mm), water is
able to penetrate the facade, even without high wind
pressure. For facades with defects, pores, and cracks
of less than 1 mm, the influence of wind pressure in
water penetration is dominant, while, in the case of
damaged or poorly maintained facades, the major
influence in the penetration process is the amount of
water falling on the facade, [21]. Experimental
studies, [16] indicated that, for values of incident
water flow (“iwf”) in walls ranging between 100 l/h
and 240 l/h, the infiltrated water flow (“fiw”) in
walls could tend to be higher in horizontal mortar
joints (“hmj”), than in vertical mortar joints (“vmj”).
In vertical joints “fiw” could be, likely, lower for a
crack width of 0,7 mm, when compared to a crack
width of 1 mm to 2 mm, which indicates that UPV
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.87