Relevance of Responsible Consumption in Colombia and Its Alignment
at a Regional and Local Level
MARÍA EUGENIA BUITRAGO GONZÁLEZ, SANDRA SANTACOLOMA LONDOÑO,
MÓNICA ANDREA MARTÍNEZ MARTINA, VIVIAN MILEN OREJUELA RUÍZ,
ALEJANDRA MARÍA RODRÍGUEZ CORREA, JENNIFER SOTO LÓPEZ,
KAREN GRUESO ANGULO
Faculty of Engineering,
Central Unit of Valle del Cauca,
Carrera 27 A No. 48 -144 Kilometer 1 South Exit, Tuluá,
COLOMBIA
Abstract: - Responsible consumption is considered a primary objective for social and economic development
and at the same time essential for sustainable development. The purpose of this study is to analyze the
relevance of SDG-12, particularly in responsible consumption, in Colombia, Valle del Cauca, and Tuluá, to
establish the alignment of the goals that are presented at the national, regional, and local levels, and that
contributes to the country advances in the fulfillment of this objective. Initially, a theoretical analysis was
carried out where the main approaches that responsible consumption has had over time were identified;
subsequently, the analysis of the relevance of responsible consumption at different scales was carried out, for
which the adaptation of an alignment methodology of the SDGs was carried out, using the Rapid Integrated
Assessment tool RIA; SPSS software was used for data analysis. The above, made it possible to establish the
contribution made from the national to the local level, for the fulfillment of the goals of SDG-12. It was
identified that in the country all the goals of SDG 12 were prioritized, although several have a low level of
coverage; in Valle del Cauca and Tuluá, some goals are not prioritized.
Key-Words: - responsible consumption, sustainable development, environmental deterioration, environmental
indicators, natural resources
Received: March 21, 2023. Revised: June 23, 2023. Accepted: August 25, 2023. Published: September 13, 2023.
1 Introduction
Since the 1970s, with the Stockholm conference in
1972, it has been established that unsustainable
models of production and consumption present a
high risk to the stability of environmental goods and
services. In addition, it was emphasized that, if the
current form of consumption was maintained,
renewable resources would be depleted. In this
conference, the analysis of the forms of
consumption was recommended to contribute to
laying the foundations for a better use of natural
resources in the world, considering the
environmental impacts of their production and use,
[1]. Later in Tbilisi, the significant influence of the
media on consumer behavior was considered, and in
turn how this behavior influences natural resources
and the environment. Also, the responsibility of
those who produce goods and advertise them, to the
negative consequences on the environment was
recognized, [2].
Subsequently, in 1992, the Earth Summit in Rio
stated among its principles that, to contribute to
peoples quality of life of the population, in turn,
move towards sustainable development, countries
would have to change unsustainable forms of
production and consumption. With Agenda 21, a
global process focused on cleaner production began,
with the permanent development of preventive
strategies, to reduce environmental risks and
increase eco-efficiency by integrating it into
processes, products, and services. In this sense, it
was sought to orient production and consumption
towards responsible management of the
environment, [3].
In 2002, in Johannesburg, at The United Nations
World Summit for Sustainable Development,
pointed out that the highest income nations were
responsible for the largest percentage of
consumption worldwide, in contrast to the lowest
income countries that are only responsible for a
smaller percentage. At this summit, global attention
was drawn to the need to transform unsustainable
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
852
Volume 19, 2023
patterns of production and consumption. The
implementation of a ten-year program to rapidly
transform consumption and production patterns
towards sustainable ones, known as 10YFP, [4], was
also proposed. And in 2003, within the framework
of the ten-year program, the Marrakech process
began to help in the execution of policies and pilot
projects at the international level on sustainable
consumption and production, [5].
At Rio+20 in 2012, urgent action was called for
an unsustainable pattern of production and
consumption. The need to address environmental
sustainability was also recalled, recognizing that
significant transformations, in the way in which
societies produce and consume, to achieve
sustainable development, [6].
Finally, the United Nations, [7], approved the
2030 Agenda which proposes 17 Sustainable
Development Goals, including goal 12 on
responsible production and consumption, [8], which
aims to guarantee that these are sustainable. In this
sense, among other goals, the ordering and use of
natural resources in a sustainable manner, the
incorporation of sustainable actions, and the
substantial decrease in waste production have been
proposed.
50 years after the first summit, and despite the
actions taken to address this situation, the pressures
on ecosystems derived from consumption and
production models continue, and environmental
deterioration continues to increase. A situation to
which Colombia is no stranger, where intense
pressure is being generated on the natural
component due to unsustainable production and
consumption models, leading to the deterioration of
environmental quality and harming the development
of the country's productive sector, causing
imbalances that must be addressed and corrected,
[9]. In addition to this, in the country, the
generation of knowledge and research in responsible
production and consumption presents considerable
limitations. The challenges posed by the SDGs for
Colombia are accentuated by its low research
capacity, [10].
There are several methods of measuring the
progress of the SDGs, [11], [12], among which is
the indicator measurement method, and the
measurement of the distance towards the SDG
goals. The indicator measurement method has a
wide scope and is suitable for monitoring the SDGs
at the national level, some indicators can be directly
adopted from the global framework. However, this
method presents some problems such as numerous
indicators, limited description of objectives and
targets, duplicate or overlapping indicators, and
poor clarity in groupings, [11].
In the case of the methodology for measuring
the distance to the SDG targets, [13], it seeks to
measure the distance to achieve the SDG targets in
the country. Use a simple geometric growth model
to assess the direction and pace of recent changes in
SDG progress. Among the main difficulties of this
methodology is the availability of data to establish
the distances to travel to achieve the goals, there are
gaps in the data, and it does not make a direct
estimate of the value of the indicator for 2030.
Considering the limitations of these methodologies,
it is necessary to work on a process of relevance or
localization of the SDGs, which can be applied at
the subnational or regional level to find additional
ways to measure the progress of the SDGs, to
support the information system that the country has,
due to the challenges represented by the monitoring
of its goals and indicators, [14]. Another challenge
that arises is the alignment at different territorial
levels of the SDGs, for the clear identification of
their progress, [15].
In this context, it is important to establish the
relevance of responsible consumption to contribute
to the efficient use of resources and mitigation of
the environmental impact generated by human
activities, [16]. To achieve this, research is required
to enable the identification of actions in responsible
consumption adopted at different scales, and in the
country to attend to the call made by the National
Planning Department (DNP), by establishing the
need to work on the issue of consumption
responsible to reduce the extraction of resources,
food waste, increase recycling rates, between others,
determining it as a pending task, [17].
This study presents the adaptation of the SDG
follow-up methodology, rapid integrated assessment
- RIA, at a regional and local level, to establish the
contribution that is made from these planning levels
to the country's progress in achieving the goals of
the SDGs, since most of the methodologies reported
in the literature for monitoring the SDGs are
oriented only at the national level.
Also, this study shows the application of this
monitoring methodology to a specific SDG, SDG-
12, in a department and city of the country. Its
application makes it possible to identify the
alignment between the different levels, regarding
the fulfillment of the SDG-12 goals. The
contributions found report the general application of
the methodologies to all the SDGs, with currently
limited studies that specify SDG-12 at subnational
levels.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
853
Volume 19, 2023
This study serves as a reference for the analysis
of the relevance of SDG 12 and the other SDGs, at
the subnational level, in other countries. In addition,
it provides information that favors the development
of national, regional, and local strategies to advance
SDG 12, based on the alignment between the
different levels.
The main objective of this research is to analyze
the relevance of SDG-12, specifically in
Responsible Consumption, in Colombia, Valle del
Cauca, and Tuluá.
2 Problem Formulation
2.1 Methodology
According to the problem posed, the following
methodology was carried out:
2.1.1 Determination of the Main Approaches
Established in Responsible Consumption
Worldwide
This stage was carried out to establish the guiding
elements that responsible consumption has had since
its beginning, entrenchment, and progress and that
have contributed to the design of planning strategies
in this topic in the country. At this stage, the
approaches to responsible consumption at a global
level are established in international conferences on
the environment that have addressed responsible
consumption and in institutions that advance,
coordinate, support, and guide strategies on this
issue worldwide.
For the analysis of the orientations or
approaches on the subject of Sustainable
Consumption, the search, review, evaluation, and
systematization of information was carried out in
the Conferences of Stockholm, Belgrade, Tbilisi,
Rio, Johannesburg, Rio+20, Stockholm+50 among
others. And in Institutions such as the UN, UNEP,
and UNESCO.
The analysis identified the main aspects raised
in responsible consumption in each of the
conferences and the international institutional
guidelines on the subject. This made it possible to
establish a global panorama of responsible
consumption.
2.1.2 Analysis of the Relevance of Responsible
Consumption at a National, Regional, and Local
Level
For the development of this stage, the Rapid
Integrated Assessment tool -RIA, [12], [18], was
adopted, which provides an indicative vision of the
level of alignment of the country with the goals of
the sustainable development objective (SDG) 12 on
responsible consumption and production. Initially,
the goals of this SDG were mapped in accordance
with the country's priorities established for this topic
in the National Development Plan 2018-2022, [19],
where the main thematic areas in which planning is
supported at the national level were identified (for
example, economic growth, protection and social
challenges, health, education, good governance,
renewable natural resources, environment
conservation, among others), and subsequently, the
goals of SDG-12 were related to these areas. This
information made it possible to establish how SGD-
12 is reflected in the national goals and targets.
Also, to establish the coherence and relevance that
is presented at the country level in responsible
consumption, concerning the approaches established
at the global level obtained in the results of the first
stage.
In the same way, the relevance of responsible
consumption was analyzed at the regional level in
Valle del Cauca, for which the goals of SDG 12
were mapped in accordance with the department's
priorities, established for this SDG in the
Development Plan for Valle del Cauca (2020-2023),
[20], and at the local level in the city of Tuluá, the
mapping of the goals of SDG 12 was carried out in
accordance with the priorities of the city, established
for this SDG in the Development Plan for the
municipality of Tuluá (2020-2023), [21]. For each
level, the goals were related to the thematic
planning areas identified.
These mappings were contrasted with the results
of the analysis of the relevance of responsible
consumption for the country, to establish the
alignment between the different levels. This was
done to find out the priorities at the regional and
local levels in responsible consumption in relation
to the priorities set at the national level, [22]. In the
information processing, the SPSS software was
used.
3 Problem Solution
3.1 Results and Discussion
3.1.1 Main Approaches to Responsible
Consumption Worldwide
The guidelines on responsible consumption
established by international environmental
conferences such as the Stockholm Earth Summit,
the Tbilisi Conference, the Rio Summit, the
Johannesburg Summit, the Marrakech Process, the
Rio+20 Conference, and Stockholm+50 have
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
854
Volume 19, 2023
oriented the guidelines on the subject. In Stockholm,
[1], the importance of considering the
environmental impacts of the production and use of
energy resources compared to consumption was
highlighted, to contribute to establishing the
principles for better use. Later in Tbilisi, [2], the
responsibility of consumers was considered, with
their behavior regarding the use of resources, and
their repercussions on the environment, recognizing
that they are influenced by the media.
At the Rio conference, responsible consumption
was explicitly addressed for the first time; there it
was established that, worldwide, mainly in
developed countries, unsustainable production and
consumption are the main cause of environmental
damage, [23], a condition that threatens the
continuity of several environmental goods and
services that allow the development of productive
activities and the improvement of the quality of life
of the population. Subsequently, in Johannesburg,
[4], necessary guidelines were proposed to
transform unsustainable production and
consumption models, establishing that to achieve
sustainable development on a global scale, it is
necessary to make changes in the way societies
produce and consume. Similarly, a framework
agreement was generated with actions to be carried
out in the next 10 years in responsible production
and consumption. This sought to strengthen
international cooperation and increase access to
information, required to favor the implementation of
programs at the national and regional levels that
would promote responsible production and
consumption.
Following the Marrakech process, [24], the
execution of policies and projects on a pilot scale,
on sustainable consumption and production was
sought, supporting initiatives to promote changes in
the framework of global processes and contributing
to the design of 10-year programs, for this, the
process considered the identification of needs and
priorities in sustainable consumption and
production.
Later, at Rio+20, [6], the importance of
promoting sustainable consumption and production
patterns was reaffirmed as one of the objectives and
essential requirements to achieve sustainable
development. Similarly, it was insisted that to
achieve sustainable development worldwide, it is
essential to carry out a significant transformation in
how society consumes and produces. Finally, in
Stockholm+50, [25], the need to speed up
compliance with the goals of SDG 12 through the
efficient use of resources and the circular economy
was repeatedly emphasized; also promoting more
responsible lifestyles and consumption through,
among other things, the provision of consumer
information and better labeling. It was stressed that
responsible consumption and production should be
at the center of environmental solutions.
The United Nations (UN) is among the
institutions that at the international level address
responsible consumption in different areas,
contributing to its dissemination and the
development of programs that handle the issue, such
as the Program for the Environment (UNEP), for
Education (UNESCO), and Development (UNDP).
UNESCO and UNEP, [26], have recognized that
today's young people represent a considerable group
within the consumer society, and the behaviors that
they develop now will have a decisive role in future
consumption habits. As consumers, their decisions
increasingly influence markets and lifestyles. These
consumers recognize that many future decisions will
be in their hands, and some of them already show
responsible and positive attitudes towards caring for
the environment, [27]. On the other hand, it
emphasizes the relevance of education to shape
behaviors, attitudes, and values, and at the same
time promotes the development of skills, abilities,
and commitment required to contribute to a
sustainable future.
In relation to responsible consumption,
education is sought that contributes to the
satisfaction of the fundamental needs of the global
population, the reduction of excesses, and the
minimization of environmental damage. Through
education, the population can be provided with
mechanisms that promote responsible consumption,
which implies a commitment from the entire
community. Education responsible consumption is
required to contribute to change in society, [28].
The UNEP, [29], considers that responsible
consumption refers to the use of goods and services
to respond to basic needs and contribute to
improving the quality of life; seeks to
simultaneously reduce the use of natural heritage
and toxic components, as well as exposure to waste
and polluting materials. Responsible consumption,
from an integrated approach with sustainable
production, contributes to achieving the goals of
development plans, minimizing future social,
economic, and environmental costs, in addition to
reducing poverty and strengthening economic
competitiveness. Also, in this program it is
established that measures must be taken to change
the current patterns of unsustainable production and
consumption, motivating the nations to work
together in the development and admission of an
integrated policy of responsible production and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
855
Volume 19, 2023
consumption and the strengthening of the dialogue,
cooperation and participation of all interested
parties, and thus achieve progress.
For the United Nations, [30], the modes of
consumption and responsible production include
issues from different sectors that acquire a
comprehensive perspective and consider
environmental, social, and economic aspects of
sustainable development, in a balanced way.
Likewise, it considers that production and
consumption activities are fundamental in the world
economy, but current patterns are rapidly ending
natural wealth, deteriorating ecosystem services,
and exhausting the possibilities of nations to
respond to their needs sustainably. The
transformation in production and consumption
trends is necessary so that the ecological footprint
decreases and leads to economic growth within the
framework of sustainable development. In the
same way, companies and the consumer society
must heed the call to reduce waste and increase
recycling. Additionally, to achieve the proposals
raised by 2030, it is required to accompany
developing countries so that they can move forward
with the incorporation of sustainable production and
consumption practices, [16].
3.2 Relevance of Responsible Consumption
at the National, Regional and Local Level
The analysis of planning documents in the country,
such as the National Development Plan 2018-2022,
[14], allowed to establish the goals related to
responsible consumption that Colombia planned for
this period of time, finding, among them: promoting
responsible and sustainable tourism, create
environments healthy food, increase the hectares of
sustainable production systems, implement
sustainable production alternatives for the
conservation of strategic environmental areas,
implement actions for the reconversion and
development of sustainable production processes,
advance in the system of socially and
environmentally sustainable purchases, carry out
sustainable management of the water sources of the
Pacific region, potentiate the entrepreneurship of
green businesses and the sustainable use of marine
ecosystems, promote the conservation and
sustainable use of natural capital.
The contrast of this information with the goals
set for SDG-12 allowed its classification according
to the main sectors considered in planning such as
economic growth, protection and social challenges,
health, education, development and management of
resources, employment, renewable natural
resources, good governance, tourism and sustainable
development, trade, industry and mining,
hydroelectric power, renewable energy, preservation
and promotion of culture, ICT and media,
competitiveness, settlements and housing,
construction, and conservation of the atmosphere.
Among the goals prioritized in the country by
multiple sectors are goal 12.5 Prevention, reduction,
recycling, and reuse of waste; target 12.6 Adoption
of sustainable practices in companies; and target
12.7 Sustainable public procurement, coinciding
with what was reported by the DNP in the progress
reports of the Colombia SDGs, [31], [32]. The
Country has worked on this last goal since the
National Policy on Sustainable Production and
Consumption was implemented in 2010,
recognizing the importance of considering
sustainable criteria for the acquisition of products
and services in the public sector, promoting
sustainable public purchases, when considering the
great purchasing power that the State has, this being
a key scenario to accelerate the achievement of SDG
12, [33]. In this sense, Colombia proposed a
conceptual and methodological guide for carrying
out sustainable public procurement that has been
tested by different countries, [34].
The sectors at the national level that prioritized
the most SDG-12 goals were Commerce, Industry,
and Mining; Economic growth; and environmental
conservation. Among the goals prioritized by these
sectors are the common 12.1 Application of the
Ten-Year Framework programs on sustainable
production and consumption modalities; 12.5
Prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse of waste;
target 12.6 Adoption of sustainable practices in
companies; target 12.7 Sustainable public
procurement; and 12. b Sustainable tourism.
In the mapping carried out, no goals were
presented without prioritizing, however, several of
them require greater coverage, such as goal 12.4
Ecological management of chemical products and
waste, and goal 12. b Sustainable tourism. In the
same way, the sustainable Tourism sectors; and
Settlements and housing were the goals that
prioritized the least.
In the same way, as at the national level, the
analysis of the Development Plan for Valle del
Cauca (2020-2023), [20], and the Development Plan
for the municipality of Tuluá (2020-2023), [21],
allowed the mapping of responsible consumption
goals at the regional and local levels.
At the departmental level, its development plan
highlights the promotion of clean production and
responsible consumption practices, support and
incentives for circular economy, solid waste
management, sustainable tourism, food security,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
856
Volume 19, 2023
environmental management, and sustainable use of
biodiversity, among others. At the municipal level,
priorities are presented such as the conservation of
natural resources, comprehensive management of
solid waste, and sustainable agricultural
development, amongst others.
Between the goals prioritized in the department
by multiple sectors are goals 12.3 Reduction of food
waste; 12.5 Prevention, reduction, recycling, and
reuse of waste; and 12. b Achieve sustainable
tourism.
The sectors that prioritized the most SDG-12
goals were Development and resource management,
and Conservation of the environment. Amongst the
goals prioritized by these sectors are 12.2
Sustainable management and efficient use of natural
resources; 12.3 Reduction of food waste; 12.4
Ecological management of chemical products; 12.5
Prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse of waste;
and 12.8 Ensure education for sustainable
development.
The non-prioritized goals were 12.6 Adoption of
sustainable practices in companies; 12.
Strengthening of science and technology for
sustainability; and 12. c Regulation of fossil fuel
subsidies.
At the local level, amongst the goals prioritized
in the municipality by multiple sectors are goals
12.1 Application of the Ten-Year Framework
programs on sustainable production and
consumption modalities; 12.7 Sustainable public
procurement; and 12.8 Ensure education for
sustainable development.
The sectors that prioritized the most SDG-12
goals were Development and resource management,
Protection, and social challenges. Between the goals
prioritized by these sectors are 12.2 Sustainable
management and efficient use of natural resources;
12.5 Prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse of
waste; 12.6. Adoption of sustainable practices in
companies; 12.7 Sustainable public procurement
and 12.8 Ensure education for sustainable
development.
The non-prioritized goals were 12.3 Food waste
reduction; 12. Strengthening of science and
technology for sustainability; 12. b Achieve
sustainable tourism and 12. c Regulation of fossil
fuel subsidies.
At the local level, institutions such as the
Central University of Valle del Cauca-UCEVA,
[35], the Regional Autonomous Corporation of
Valle del Cauca - CVC, [36] center-north, and the
Secretary of Agricultural Assistance and the
Environment- SEDAMA, [37], have worked on the
issue of responsible consumption, assuming it as a
transversal theme that permeates all environmental
components, such as water resources, soil, air, since
the excess demand for natural resources affects the
quality of life; and have acted on issues related to
the goals on waste management, including
hazardous waste, in terms of generation, use,
recycling, final disposal, and circular economy.
These activities have been carried out in a
participatory manner, involved the community in
the development of these, and routes have been
established for the implementation of actions in
environmental education around the promotion of a
culture of responsible consumption.
Together with different actors who are
responsible for the issue of solid waste, such as the
mayor's office, the company that provides the
cleaning service, and community organizations, they
permanently carry out activities to raise awareness
and educate people on the subject; training sessions
are also held, as well as practical recycling
workshops, post-consumer waste collection
sessions, and the construction of agroecological
gardens, among others, these sustainable practices
impact compliance with SDG 12, [38].
The actions have been oriented with an
environmental educational approach and with
important work on the issue of solid waste
management and food safety; work that is carried
out jointly between public and private entities, and
that includes the community to promote a
sustainable lifestyle, considering the importance of
the local context and sociocultural aspects in the
development of activities and practices in
responsible consumption, [39]. This is in line with
the recommendations to achieve the goals of SDG
12, such as cooperation between actors, and
consumer awareness through education on
sustainable lifestyles, [40], this environmental
knowledge facilitates compliance with the goals
established in SGD 12, [41].
Following the above and in contrast to what is
established in the relevance of responsible
consumption in the country, it is observed that goals
such as 12.5 (Prevention, reduction, recycling, and
reuse of waste) is the one that has been worked on
the most and has oriented towards the formation of
responsible consumption habits in the population
through environmental education, this goal being
prioritized at the national level and also addressed at
the departmental and municipal levels. That is, the
activities carried out on these scales contribute to
the fulfillment of the goal in the country. In this
sense, the importance of joint work is highlighted to
understand the challenges and how it is collectively
contributed through the different levels, [42], and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
857
Volume 19, 2023
across sectors to do more, efficiently and
effectively, to accelerate progress towards the
achievement of the SDGs by 2030, [22], including
SDG-12.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate the summary of
the Rapid Integrated Assessment- RIA is carried out
at the national, regional, and local levels. In the
mapping it was identified that in the country all the
SDG-12 targets analyzed were prioritized, however,
several of them present a low level of coverage.
At the departmental and municipal levels, some
goals of SDG-12 are not prioritized. Similarly, the
mapping made it possible to establish that in
Colombia all the sectors analyzed have prioritized
goals of SDG-12, finding several sectors with a low
level of prioritization such as Settlements and
Housing. And correspondingly, for the department
of Valle del Cauca, and the city of Tuluá, in this
sector, SDG-12 targets were not prioritized.
Fig. 1: Rapid Integrated assessment of SDG-12
targets prioritized at the national, regional, and local
levels.
Fig. 2: Rapid Integrated assessment of SDG-12
targets prioritized by sectors at the national,
regional, and local levels.
In contrast to the approaches established at the
global level on responsible consumption, coherence,
and relevance to the prioritized goals of SDG-12 at
the national, regional, and local levels are observed.
However, as evidenced in the mapping, some goals
were not prioritized at the regional and municipal
levels, which is why a higher level of alignment is
required in planning at all levels with the goals
established in SDG-12, which will allow a better
performance of the country compared to its
contributions in the achievement of these goals at a
global level. Likewise, it is important to bear in
mind that the scope of the goals in responsible
production and consumption at the different levels
also depends on the synergistic interactions with
other SDGs, [43], that contribute to their progress,
[44], and that they need to be analyzed.
4 Conclusion
An important contribution to studying the progress
in responsible consumption in the country was the
analysis of world conferences on the environment,
and of the institutions that address responsible
consumption, which allowed establishing the main
approaches to responsible consumption worldwide,
among which it highlights its transversally and the
importance it has in meeting the development goals
of the countries, in reducing environmental,
economic and social costs, in reducing poverty and
in improving economic competitiveness.
In establishing the relevance of responsible
consumption for the country, it was possible to
show that Colombia has considered SDG-12 in its
development plan, finding that three goals of this
SDG were prioritized to a greater extent, 12.5; 12.6
and 12.7, which refer to the prevention, reduction,
recycling, and reuse of waste; the adoption of
sustainable practices in companies; and sustainable
public procurement, respectively. It was also
possible to establish that there is a lack of greater
alignment with the ecological management of
chemical products and waste (goal 12.4), and
sustainable tourism (goal 12. b). The sectors that
prioritized a greater number of SDG-12 targets were
environmental conservation, and resource
development and management.
From the regional and local level, it has
contributed to goal 12.5 on prevention, reduction,
recycling, and reuse of waste, which was prioritized
at the national level. This has been one of the goals
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
858
Volume 19, 2023
in which more studies and activities have been
carried out in Valle del Cauca and Tuluá, which
represents a significant contribution to its fulfillment
in the country. Similarly, the identification of the
actions carried out in responsible consumption
allowed for establishing that a better alignment is
required between the different levels in the planning
of the country, the department and the municipality
with respect to the goals of SDG-12.
References:
[1] United Nations (1972). Report of the United
Nations Conference on the Human
Environment Stockholm 1972.
https://documents-dds-
ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/NL7/300/05/PD
F/NL730005.pdf?OpenElement
[2] UNESCO (1977). Intergovernmental
Conference on Environmental Education
Tbilisi 1977. Final Report.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000
032763
[3] United Nations (1992). Report of the United
Nations Conference on Environment and
Development Rio de Janeiro 1992.
https://documents-dds-
ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N92/836/55/PD
F/N9283655.pdf?OpenElement
[4] United Nations. (2002). Report of the World
Summit on Sustainable Development
Johannesburg 2002. https://documents-dds-
ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N02/636/93/PD
F/ N0263693.pdf?OpenElement
[5] United Nations Environment programme
UNEP (2011). Paving the Way for
Sustainable Consumption and Production the
Marrakech Process- Progress Report.
https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/
33113
[6] United Nations. (2012). Report of the United
Nations. Conference on Sustainable
Development Rio de Janeiro 2012.
https://documents-dds-
ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N12/461/64/PD
F/N1246164.pdf? OpenElement
[7] United Nations. (2015). Resolution adopted
by the General Assembly on 25 September
2015. 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development.
https://documents-dds-
ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PD
F/N1529189.pdf? OpenElement
[8] Segovia-
Hernández J.G.;Hernández S.; Cossío-
Vargas E.; Sánchez-Ramírez E.(2023).
Challenges and opportunities in process
intensification to achieve the UN's 2030
agenda: Goals 6, 7, 9, 12 and 13. Chemical
Engineering and Processing - Process
Intensification. Vol 192, 109507; Doi:
10.1016/j.cep.2023.109507
[9] Ministry of Environment and Sustainable
Development. (2010). National Sustainable
Production and Consumption Policy. Bogota.
Presidency of the Republic. Ministerio de
Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Política
Nacional de Producción y Consumo
sostenible. Bogotá. Presidencia de la
Republica.
[10] Chavarro, D., Vélez, M., Tovar, G.,
Montenegro, I., Hernández, A., Olaya, A.
(2017). The Sustainable Development Goals
in Colombia and the contribution of science,
technology and innovation. Colciencias.
Colombia. Los Objetivos de Desarrollo
Sostenible en Colombia y el aporte de la
ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación.
Colciencias. Colombia. Doi:
10.13140/RG.2.2.31118.87368
[11] Liu S., Bai J., Chen J. (2019). Measuring SDG
15 at the County Scale: Localization and
Practice of SDGs Indicators Based on
Geospatial Information. International Journal
of Geo-information 8(11), 515; Doi:
10.3390/ijgi8110515
[12] Freigedo M., Milanesi A., Ferreira C. (2020).
Applying RIA methodology for SDGs
monitoring at a local level. Claeh Notebooks.
Cuadernos del Claeh, 39 (112), 119-132.
Doi: 10.29192/claeh.39.2.8
[13] Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development-OECD.(2022). Measuring the
distance to achieve the goals of the SDGs
Colombia. https://www.oecd. -
ilibrary.org/sites/397d9d96-
en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/39
7d9d96-
en#:~:text=Colombia%20has%20already%20
achieved%2011,by%202030%20
(Figure%201).
[14] National Planning Department -NPD. (2018).
National Council of Economic and Social
Policy - CONPES 3918. Strategy for the
implementation of the sustainable
development goals (SDG) in Colombia.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación -DNP
(2018). Consejo Nacional de Política
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
859
Volume 19, 2023
Económica y Social - CONPES 3918.
Estrategia para la implementación de los
objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) en
Colombia.
https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/
Econ%C3%B3micos/3918.pdf
[15] Proantioquia (2021). Country challenges
facing the implementation of the 2030
Agenda. (Retos de país frente a la
implementación de la Agenda 2030)
https://www.proantioquia.org.co/retos-
agenda-2030
[16] Arora, N.K., Mishra, I. (2023). Responsible
consumption and production: a roadmap to
sustainable development. Environmental
Sustainability 6, 16. DOI: 10.1007/s42398-
023-00266-9
[17] United Nations Development Program
UNDP. (2018). SDG in Colombia. Challenges
for 2030. (Programa de las Naciones Unidas
para el Desarrollo- PNUD ODS en Colombia.
Retos para el 2030).
https://www.co.undp.org/content/colombia/es/
home/library/ods/ods-en-colombia--los-retos-
para-2030.html
[18] United Nations Development Program-
UNDP (2017). A Multi-Dimensional Focus
for the 2030 Agenda.
https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/
files/migration/latinamerica/a911f25b616fa77
2e370f0
b95c82647d5814c9d90ba071aa73b340e56bb8
f88e.pdf.
[19] National Planning Department -NPD. (2018).
National Development Plan 2018-2022 Pact
for Colombia-Pact for equity. (Departamento
Nacional de Planeación -DNP Plan de
Desarrollo Nacional 2018-2022 Pacto por
Colombia-Pacto por la equidad).
https://www.dnp.gov.co/DNPN/Paginas/Plan-
Nacional-de-Desarrollo.aspx
[20] Government of the Valle. (2020).
Departmental Development Plan 2020-2023
(Valle Invincible. Gobernación del Valle. Plan
de Desarrollo Departamental 2020-2023 Valle
Invencible).
https://www.valledelcauca.gov.co/loader.php?
lServicio=Tools2&lTipo=viewpdf&id=43404
[21] Municipal Mayor's Office of Tulua (2020).
Municipal Development Plan 2020-2023
(Tulua of the people for the people. Alcaldía
Municipal de Tuluá Plan de Desarrollo
Municipal 2020-2023 Tuluá de la gente para
la gente). https://tulua.gov.co/wp-
content/uploads/2020/11/Plan-de-Desarrollo-
2020-2023-Tulua-de-la-Gente-Para-La-
Gente.pdf
[22] Hinton, R., Armstrong, C., Asri, E. et
al. (2021). Specific considerations for
research on the effectiveness of multisectoral
collaboration: methods and lessons from 12
country case studies. Global Health 17(18),
1-11. Doi:10.1186/s12992-021-00664-w
[23] Glavič P. (2021). Evolution and Current
Challenges of Sustainable Consumption and
Production. Sustainability. 13(16):9379. Doi:
10.3390/su13169379
[24] United Nations Environment programme
UNEP (2007). Mechanisms Marrakech of the
process
https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/marrakech/gp
aper3.pdf
[25] United Nations (2022). Report-
Stockholm+50: a Healthy Planet for the
Prosperity of All Our Responsibility, Our
Opportunity 2022. https://documents-dds-
ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/K22/117/97/PD
F/K2211797.pdf?OpenElement
[26] United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization UNESCO; United
Nations Environment Programme UNEP
(2002). YouthXchange: towards sustainable
lifestyles; training kit on responsible
consumption, the guide.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000
124085
[27] Peñalosa, M., López, D., Fischer, L., &
Ortega, M. (2021). (Consumption in the
millennials in the time of covid-19 in Mexico,
Ecuador and Colombia. Consumo de los
millenias en tiempo de covid-19 en México,
Ecuador y Colombia). Venezolana De
Gerencia, 26(96), 1380-1395.
Doi:10.52080/rvgluz.26.96.24
[28] Martín, M., Casares, L., & Cáceres, J. (2021).
Education for sustainable consumption from
critical pedagogy. (Educación para el
consumo sostenible desde la pedagogía
crítica. Educacao e Pesquisa), 47, 1-17. Doi:
10.1590/S16784634202147235557
[29] United Nations Environment Programme
UNEP. (2010). ABC of SCP: Clarifying
Concepts on Sustainable Consumption and
Production
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content
/documents/945ABC_ENGLISH.pdf
[30] United Nations Environment Programme
UNEP. (2017). Consuming Differently,
Consuming Sustainably: Behavioural Insights
for Policymaking.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
860
Volume 19, 2023
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content
/documents/2404Behavioral%20Insights.pdf
[31] National Planning Department -NPD. (2021).
Annual report on progress in the
implementation of the SDGs in Colombia.
(Departamento Nacional de Planeación -DNP
Informe anual de avance en la
implementación de los ODS en Colombia).
https://assets.ctfassets.net/27p7ivvbl4bs/7myP
rzLxNgtrIV0ZZ9PLS6/4fcaa686e86371ab12d
e75c69f382571/2021-12-
29_Informe_final_2021.pdf
[32] National Planning Department -NPD; United
Nations Colombia. (2022). Progress report on
prioritized SDG indicators: first semester
2022. (Departamento Nacional de Planeación
-DNP, Naciones Unidas Colombia Reporte de
avance de indicadores ODS priorizados:
primer semestre 2022).
https://www.dane.gov.co/files/indicadores-
ods/2022-1-Reporte-avance-Indicadores-
ODS-prio.pdf
[33] Valverde, J., & Avilés-Palacios, C. (2021).
Circular economy as a catalyst for progress
towards the sustainable development goals: A
positive relationship between two self-
sufficient variables. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(22), 1-16.
Doi:10.3390/su132212652
[34] Jereissati, L. & Melo, A. (2020). Sustainable
public procurement and the implementation of
target 12.7 of the sustainable development
goals (SDGs) in Brazil: advances and
setbacks. (As contratações públicas
sustentáveis e a implementação da meta 12.7
dos objetivos para o desenvolvimento
sustentável (ODS) no Brasil: avanços e
retrocessos). Políticas Públicas, 10, n. 3. 491-
519. Doi: 10.5102/rbpp. v10i3.7237
[35] Central Unit of Valle del Cauca-UCEVA, -
Regional Autonomous Corporation of Valle
del Cauca- CVC. (2013). Environmental
educational strategy in sustainable
consumption habits. SAS Latin American
Leadership School and SAS Online
Educational Content. Colombia. (U. Central
del Valle del Cauca-UCEVA, - Corporación
Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca-
CVC. (2013). Estrategia educativo ambiental
en Hábitos de consumo sostenible. Escuela
Latinoamericana de liderazgo SAS y
Contenidos Educativos Online SAS.
Colombia).
[36] Regional Autonomous Corporation of Valle
del Cauca- CVC. (2020). Advances in
sustainable consumption. (Corporación
Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca
CVC. Avances en consumo sostenible).
[37] Secretariat of Agriculture and Environment -
SEDAMA Tulua (2020). Hincapié Vega, A.
Progress on Objective 12. Responsible
production and consumption. (Secretaría de
Agricultura y Medio Ambiente -SEDAMA
Tuluá. Hincap Vega, A. Avances del
Objetivo 12. Producción y consumo
responsable).
[38] Jacob-John, J., D’souza, C., Marjoribanks, T.,
& Singaraju, S. (2021). Synergistic
interactions of sdgs in food supply chains: A
review of responsible consumption and
production. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(16), 1-17.
Doi:10.3390/su13168809
[39] Liu, C., Valentine, G., Vanderbeck, R. M.,
McQuaid, K., & Diprose, K. (2019). Placing
‘sustainability’ in context: Narratives of
sustainable consumption in Nanjing, China.
Social and Cultural Geography, 20(9), 1307-
1324. Doi:10.1080/14649365.2018.1454978
[40] Economic Commission for Latin America and
the Caribbean-ECLAC (2019). SDG 12:
Responsible production and consumption.
(Comisión Económica para América Latina y
el Caribe-CEPAL. ODS 12: Producción y
consumo responsable).
https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/static/
files/sdg12_c1900730_web.pdf
[41] Aldieri L., Makkonen T., &Vinci C.P (2022).
Do research and development and
Environmental knowledge spillovers facilitate
meeting sustainable development goals for
resource efficiency?. Resources Policy, 76, 1-
9. Doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102603
[42] Taajamaa, V, Joensuu M., Karanian B., and
Bettencourt L. (2022). Seven Steps to
Strategic SDG Sensemaking for Cities.
Administrative Sciences 12(33), 1-15.
Doi:10.3390/admsci12010033
[43] Yizhong H., Yurong Y., Tao L., Mark B.,
(2021). A method for assessing the impacts of
an international agreement on regional
progress towards Sustainable Development
Goals, Science of The Total Environment.
Volume 785, 1-11.
Doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147336
[44] Ramos, C. M., & Laurenti, R. (2020).
Towards the agenda 2030: A quantitative
analysis of synergies and trade-offs between
the sdgs of spain during 2000
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
861
Volume 19, 2023
2019. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1-
14. Doi:10.3390/su122410506
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
Central Unit of Valle del Cauca.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International , CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.81
María Eugenia Buitrago González,
Sandra Santacoloma Londoño et al.
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
862
Volume 19, 2023