Sustainable Development of Territories during the Period of Post-War
Environmental Restoration
IRYNA ALIEKSIEIENKO1, VIKTORIIA KOLTUN2, NATALIIA GRYNCHUK2,
VOLODYMYR VAKULENKO2, OKSANA KOHUT2
1Educational and Scientific Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service,
Kyiv Taras Shevchenko National University,
12/2 Akademika Romodanova str., 04050, Kyiv,
UKRAINE
2Department of Regional Policy,
Educational and Scientific Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service,
Kyiv Taras Shevchenko National University,
12/2 Akademika Romodanova str., 04050, Kyiv,
UKRAINE
Abstract: - The aim of the article was to substantiate the transformations of the conceptual foundations of
sustainable development of territories during the period of post-war ecological restoration of states. The main
methodological tools were the methods of modelling, experiment, and morphological analysis. The research
showed that countries faced a globally important task in the ecological restoration of territories in the post-war
period. The destruction of the environment and its pollution caused by military actions sharply reduce the
positive indicators of the state of the environment. It was proved that sustainable development goals act as
effective vectors for improving the state of the environment in the period of post-war ecological recovery. The
implementation of ecologically significant actions during the post-war ecological recovery in Bosnia and
Herzegovina shows that this process is complex and difficult. The problems of contradictory decisions,
corruption, and lack of transparency should be considered. The environmental strategy of BiH ESAP 2030+ of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, developed by the SDG, can be an example of the corresponding legislative regulation
in Ukraine. The UNDP’s project Sustainability of Protected Areas (SPA) implemented in Bosnia and
Herzegovina in the context of popularizing ecotourism is also worth noting. A similar project can be
implemented in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development of the country during the period of post-war
ecological restoration. The main long-term problem in the territory of Ukraine is the demining of regions,
which will also determine the terms of implementation of recovery procedures.
Key-Words: - Territorial Development, Sustainable Development, Public Management and Administration,
Post-War Reconstruction, Local Self-Government, Environment, National Security.
Received: October 19, 2022. Revised: February 23, 2023. Accepted: March 20, 2023. Published: April 21, 2023.
1 Introduction
Territorial space as a carrier of human activity
consists of the ecosystem, people, and their
interactions. A responsible attitude is necessary to
effectively harness the potential of territories
through sustainable technologies to address ongoing
planetary crises, [1]. Every region of the world
strives to make every effort to achieve positive
results in achieving a high level of sustainable
development. Climate change, urge towards
reducing fossil fuel emissions, the transition to
renewable energy sources, and a closed-loop
economy have fuelled striving for sustainable
development, [2]. However, these territories also
face unique challenges that affect the achievement
of their respective goals. Humanity has become
increasingly immersed in major environmental,
social, and economic problems worldwide, [3]. Such
problems more and more often result from military
conflicts, which inevitably cause the destruction of
the environment.
Armed conflicts produce direct and indirect
effects on the environment. Nature is being
devastated by military operations. Military
operations involve intensive shooting with a large
number of industrial risks. Industrial complexes,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
350
Volume 19, 2023
combustible storage facilities, and processing plants
are at risk. The hostilities cause water and soil
pollution, the release of pollutants into the
atmosphere, and the irreversible degradation of
biodiversity. Militarization, and corresponding
changes in the management system, economy, and
settlements, worsen the condition of the population
and habitat of wild animals. All the above reasons
contribute to long-term damage to the environment.
Post-war countries face a situation where the
achievement of peaceful objectives is far beyond the
cessation of hostilities, [4]. Among other things, the
population of those territories faces damage caused
to the environment. Wars and natural disasters cause
the devastation of territories and communities,
which leads to a decrease in the quality of life of
people in view of instability. The return of the
population to the territory of residence, new
challenges in land use planning lead to the
transformation of the environment, and the
extraction of natural resources increases
significantly, [5]. Land-use deforestation is a
frequent consequence in post-war scenarios, [6].
The reduced institutional capacity to manage the
environment further exacerbates the damage and
impedes recovery long after the end of the conflict.
An important task is the ecological restoration of
territories, which is the process of reproducing the
structure and functions of ecosystems that have been
degraded or destroyed, [7]. There are many
approaches to environmental management to
contribute to conflict prevention, mitigation,
resolution, and recovery. The realities of
settlements, societies, and the environment can be
improved through restoration in accordance with
sustainable development principles, [8]. It is
necessary to carefully study the existing experience
of recovery after military conflicts, paying special
attention to the solution to environmental problems.
The aim of such a study should be to outline the
appropriate principles for the future recovery of
affected countries, such as Ukraine. It is important
to consider the experience of countries that are
moving towards EU accession. They have the
necessary experience in restoring the environment
after military conflicts. It is necessary to study the
experience of implementing appropriate restoration
programmes, inflow of foreign capital and
technology transfer. It is important to study
examples of restoration using the principle of a
carbon-free future.
The aim of the article is to substantiate the
transformations of the conceptual model of
sustainable development of territories in the period
of post-war ecological restoration of states. In this
regard, it was necessary to fulfill the following
research objectives: 1) summarize the main vectors
of transformations in the field of sustainable
ecological development of territories, 2) consider
the current state, the main problems, and prospects
for the implementation of sustainable development
goals during the post-war ecological restoration of
the territories on the example of Bosnia and
Herzegovina with the aim of a possible
implementation of relevant strategies for the post-
war ecological restoration of Ukraine.
2 Literature Review
The study by Elder and Olsen was the main
instrument of this research, [3]. The authors studied
the environment-related objectives in the
Sustainable Development Goals. The paper
identified the main factors for achieving an
integrated approach to the environment at the level
of goals and objectives, and the importance of this
issue. The research of Ozili influenced the authors
position on the issue under study, [9]. The author
conducted a comprehensive analysis of aspects of
sustainable development and sustainability based on
the relevant literature. The fact that the inclusion of
sustainable development goals in environmental
management provides certain positive benefits was
emphasized. It should be noted that the work lacks
information about a sustainable solution to the
problem of post-war recovery of the country.
The findings of Khan in the field of comparison
of the main environmental consequences of war and
conflict were taken into account during the study,
[10]. A special place in the work is given to
consideration of the main direct and indirect effects
of war and/or conflict on the environment. Attention
was paid to the survey and comparison of the
literature related to the impact of conflict on the
environment in countries experiencing war or
conflict. The results obtained by O’Driscoll
regarding the analysis of best practices in post-
conflict recovery from academic, political and NGO
sources are of particular note, [11]. Questions were
raised as to whether a safe environment and the
support of the local population and government are
considered prerequisites for successful post-conflict
recovery.
The study by the author on connected systems of
man and nature necessary for supporting territorial
ecological recovery and promoting national and
regional high-quality development, is worth noting,
[7]. The author did not focus on post-war
environmental restoration. In the works, the
researchers discuss issues of sustainable
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
351
Volume 19, 2023
environmental development and related financing in
Bosnia and Herzegovina, [12]. The authors focused
on the need for adequate funding for environmental
protection, climate change, and sustainable
development, [13].
In turn, the authors studied the necessary
components for post-war ecological recovery in
Ukraine, [14]. It was concluded that the
achievement of sustainable development goals of
Ukraine during the period of post-war ecological
restoration can serve the sustainable development of
territories and acceleration of the countrys
accession to the EU. The study was used in shaping
the authors opinion, [6]. It emphasizes the
ecological consequences of intensive hostilities in
Ukraine. The authors made a detailed analysis of the
possibility of an ecological disaster and noted the
further significant uncertainty regarding the
consequences of military operations for the
environment and the population. In their work,
researchers analysed the possibility of adopting
sustainable development with its numerous
dimensions, [8]. The authors outline such relevant
vectors as objectivity, subjectivity, and
implementation in practice. The importance of each
of the organizational, institutional, and cultural
aspects of recovery is noted along with all
economic, social, and environmental aspects.
The study of the questions confirms that special
attention must be paid to the sustainable
development of territories during the period of post-
war ecological restoration. The diversity of
scientific research in this field is also noted.
Therefore, it is urgent to carry out research by
taking into account new research criteria.
3 Methods
Scientific and methodological tools were widely
used during the research, the results of which were
tested and reflected in the article. The research
design is shown in Figure 1.
Fig. 1: Research design
The 1ft stage of the
research
1) Identifying the main vectors
of research taking into account
the latest research of European
environmental and legal
scientific schools in the sphere
of sustainable development
and restoration of territories.
2) Primary comparative
analysis of the armed conflict
consequences in various
environmental spheres,
derivation of critical indicators
of non-recovery environent.
3) Drawing preliminary
conclusions based on the
results of the analysis of
literature.
The 2nd stage of the
research
1) Comparison of the legal
regulation of green post-war
restoration in Bosnia and
Herzegovina with the guiding
sustainable development goals
of the EU.
2) Establishing the cause-and-
effect relationship between the
low efficiency of national
reforms and the level of
sustainable development of
territories in the period of
post-war restoration of states.
3) Processing of obtained data
and their generalization.
Main experimnent
Making the author's
generalized list of the
basic leading vectors of
post-war ecological
recovery reforms in the
context of sustainable
development and the
leading environmental
goals of the European
Union, taking into
account the scientific
debatability of the issue
under research and law
enforcement practice.
Analysis of the obtained
results.
Analytical stage
Obtaining substantiated
and confirmed
theoretical and practical
conclusions and making
proposals for
implementation in legal
regulation and law
enforcement practice of
Ukraine during the post-
war recovery period.
Ascertained the main
long-term problem on the
territory of Ukraine is the
demining of territories,
which will also
determine the terms of
implementation of
recovery procedures.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
352
Volume 19, 2023
Modeling was the main practical research
method, which provided an opportunity to
investigate the internationally declared ideal
sustainable development model based on abstract
and logical thinking based on the principles of
visibility and objectivity of the phased
implementation of sustainable development goals on
the territory of Europe. This method will help to
build an updated conceptual model of the
foundations of sustainable development of
territories in the period of post-war ecological
restoration of states within the scope of further
research.
The method of experiment was applied to make
the author’s generalized list of the basic leading
vectors of post-war ecological recovery reforms in
the context of sustainable development and the
leading environmental goals of the European Union,
taking into account the scientific debatability of the
issue under research and law enforcement practice.
The observation was another practical method,
which was used to consider the leading features of
the post-war restoration of the territory of Bosnia
and Herzegovina in the context of EU membership.
This method helped to make the authors list of the
main reforming transformations of post-war
environmental restoration, which are of fundamental
importance for ensuring the sustainable
development of territories.
The axiological method served as a basis for an
idea of value orientations in society in the context of
sustainable development. On the basis of known
data, the method of extrapolation was used to build
a theoretical framework for transformations of the
conceptual model of sustainable development of
territories in the period of post-war ecological
restoration of states, explaining the influence of
various factors, the nature of their interaction during
of military conflicts.
The method of comparison was used when
analysing the legal regulation of the restoration of
the natural environment and cleaning the territories
of states from pollution after the active hostilities,
both statically and dynamically. This method was
also applied to learn the general and distinctive
properties of the constituent elements of the studied
legal norms. Comparison helped to compare the
qualitative characteristics of the environment after
the active phase of hostilities and forming a
comprehensive view of the effectiveness of law
enforcement practice. This method showed that the
lack of comprehensive approaches of the EU
member states to the approval of the sustainable
development goals in the context of ensuring
effective post-war ecological recovery of the EU
membership candidates leads to the superficial
implementation of the declared goals at the national
level. The levelling of overcoming the corruption
component can produce a negative impact on the
post-war ecological recovery as a whole, and can
potentially lead to artificial trends and distortion of
the real state of environmental pollution. The results
of applying this method gave grounds to state that
the existing negative consequences of military
actions on the territory of states are a complex task
at the cross-border level, which must be fulfilled
globally through coordinated reform innovations
and a balanced approach to the introduction of
sustainable development into the process of post-
war ecological recovery. The doctrinal approach and
morphological analysis helped to find out and
interpret the content of the regulatory acts and
documents in the area under research, to establish
the most adaptive combination of legal norms for
post-war ecological restoration. The application of
the method of historical analysis contributed to a
more effective forecasting of the ways of further
improvement of post-war ecological restoration in
the territory of Ukraine, taking into account the
experience of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This method
enabled looking at the trends of the efficiency of
sustainable development in the period of post-war
recovery through a historical perspective. Structural
and genetic analysis and synthesis were used to
identify promising reformed elements of the essence
of the object under study by means of the selection
of components of transformational processes of
sustainable development. The cause-and-effect
analysis identified the current factors influencing the
concept of sustainable development and predicted
the consequences from a global perspective.
The forecasting method was used to identify the
problem of organizational support for the strategy of
humanity’s sustainable development in the context
of effective post-war recovery. This requires the
implementation of a dynamic system of managing
global processes using a cybernetic feedback control
model, a balanced system of indicators of the
current state, and coordinated methods of
responding to the growth of negative trends that
affect human safety. Such a system will require new
institutions or the reorganization of existing ones.
Their functional duties will be developing and
implementing of a sustainable development
programme using a systemic approach, ensuring the
functioning of transparent monitoring, control
systems, and prompt response to the challenges of
post-war recovery.
In addition to the above-mentioned methods, the
methods of classification and typology were used to
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
353
Volume 19, 2023
generalize the results of environmental reforms
aimed at the accelerated recovery of the territories
of states affected by armed conflicts. The logical
method was applied as a universal means of
argumentation of the conclusions in the area under
research in the context of the outlined problem.
The used methodology is determined by the aim
of the article and the outlined objectives. It helped to
reveal the issues outlined in the article as much as
possible and to offer a proper solution to the
problems that arise during law enforcement in the
current realities.
4 Results
Sustainable development is a carefully planned
approach, the principle of growth with more
efficient use of resources. The sustainable
development goals are to ensure a balance between
economic growth, environmental protection, social
well-being, and effective governance. This approach
is essential to ensure that resources are available and
sufficient for all generations. The report of the
Brundtland Commission, formerly the World
Commission on Environment and Development was
necessary for the implementation of strategies to
prevent the deterioration of the environment. It has
become important to study how environmental
restrictions affect energy efficiency and the
development of the global economy. The Political
Declaration and Implementation Plan were adopted
at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable
Development in Johannesburg. They include
provisions covering a range of measures to be taken
to achieve sustainable environmental development.
Sustainable development has come to be considered
the ultimate goal of the United Nations' plan for the
planet.
Economic, environmental, and social factors
must be balanced to achieve sustainability. It is
necessary to ensure sustainable consumption of
natural resources, such as materials, fuel, land,
water, etc. This should be done by reducing risks
and measuring the impact of companies’ operations
on the environment. In 2015, all UN member states
adopted a 15-year plan to achieve the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), [15]. The result of
fulfilling 17 goals and 169 objectives should be to
end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure the
improvement of life and prospects of the population.
According to the 2022 UN Sustainable
Development Goals Report, interrelated crises
seriously threaten the achievement of the 2030
Sustainable Development Goals. A quarter of the
world’s population lives in conflict-torn countries,
and 100 million people have been forcibly displaced
worldwide, [16]. In this context, the World Bank
has defined the idea of post-war recovery as the
creation of the social and economic background of
society. The modern restoration of post-war
territories is based on the restoration of social,
economic, and ecological potentials with the
introduction of sustainable development.
Environmental management occupies a special place
in this process. Sustainable post-war recovery must
be adjusted to manage natural resources and waste.
Bosnia and Herzegovina can be an example of
the implementation of sustainable development
goals in the process of post-war ecological
restoration of territories. The EU was concerned that
other powers, such as Russia or China, might extend
their influence into the Balkans. The EU leaders
clearly stated that the promotion of EU expansion
towards the Western Balkans is of significant
importance in the context of the decision to grant
candidate status to Ukraine and Moldova in 2022.
the promotion of EU expansion towards the Western
Balkans is of significant importance The member
states agreed on December 15, 2022, to grant Bosnia
and Herzegovina an EU membership candidate
status. The candidate status was a clear signal to the
government agencies of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
which now have a full mandate to carry out as many
reforms as possible.
The step was made despite the fact that the
country with a population of three million people
has been saddled with a difficult environmental
situation since a devastating war three decades ago.
That is why the example of the post-war recovery of
this state in the context of Ukraine’s European path
is of great importance to be taken into account in the
processes of this country after the end of Russian
aggression. The impact on the environment during
the Bosnian war depended on the format of
hostilities in the region. About 45% of industrial
enterprises were destroyed during the war, including
about 75% of oil refineries. Damage to transport
infrastructure accounted for 35% of major roads and
40% of bridges, [17]. The war in Bosnia ended with
an international conflict-settling agreement. In 2002,
the National Steering Committee for Environment
and Sustainable Development was established in the
country. Bosnia and Herzegovina has started
preparations for joining the EU. Bosnia and
Herzegovina received $ 545.6 million in
environmental financing between 2015 and 2020,
[18].
The conditions for the production of renewable
energy have been defined in accordance with the EU
directives on sustainable development according to
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
354
Volume 19, 2023
the 2016 Renewable Energy Action Plan of Bosnia
and Herzegovina. The country has begun to pass
legislation on the construction of wind farms, as the
country has significant potential for this source of
renewable energy. The country sought to build 300
hydroelectric power plants due to the country’s large
technical hydropower potential. However, the
hydropower-related sustainability goals have been
distorted as they have become conflated with
hydropower projects embedded in complex
bureaucratic systems. Corruption was widespread in
the country, as evidenced by data from the
Corruption Perception Index in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, [19] (Table 1):
Table 1. Indicators of the corruption rate in Bosnia and Herzegovina according to the assessment of the
corruption perception for the last 9 years
2013
2014
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
0 highly corrupt,
100 very clean
42
39
39
38
38
36
35
35
Place among the
countries
72 out
of 177
80 out
of 175
83 out
of 176
91 out
of 180
89 out
of 180
101 out
of 180
111 out
of 180
110 out
of 180
Moreover, from 2013 to 2020, the situation with
the corrupt elements in the country worsened and
stabilized only in 2021. In Bosnia and Herzegovina,
social norms have undergone changes due to the
position of the oligarchy to reflect new
configurations of power. Obtaining a concession for
a hydropower project required permits from
different authorities. There was also a question
about the poor quality of the relevant environmental
examinations. The local population did not support
projects of the construction of small hydroelectric
power plants. They focused on environmental
protection and insisted on the possibility of negative
effects of hydroelectric power plants on the
microclimate. In June 2022, the Federation of
Bosnia and Herzegovina amended the Law on
Electricity. It was prohibited to build small
hydroelectric plants because they harm rivers and
biodiversity. Compared to other countries, Bosnia
and Herzegovina has a particularly rich biodiversity.
This makes the country one of the most attractive
for the development of ecotourism in Europe, which
is the driving force of sustainable development in
Bosnia and Herzegovina. National parks were
created in order to develop this sector. In September
2022, UND presented a new project Sustainability
of Protected Areas (SPA) in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, [20].
The goal is to achieve sustainable management
of protected areas and the conservation of
biodiversity. The popularization of ecotourism is
one of the project activities. Bosnia and
Herzegovina still faces several serious
environmental challenges, [21], as presented in
Figure 2.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
355
Volume 19, 2023
Fig. 2: The main environmental problems of post-war restoration in Bosnia and Herzegovina
As of 2022, Bosnia and Herzegovina is in the
early stages of preparation for EU accession in an
area related to the Green Agenda and sustainable
development. Bosnia and Herzegovina should focus
efforts on the development of the legislative
framework, administrative capacity, and monitoring
system. Particular attention should be paid to the
development of interagency coordination. In 2019,
Bosnia and Herzegovina started preparing the
Bosnia and Herzegovina Environmental Strategy
and Action Plan 2030+ with the support of the
Stockholm Environment Institute, [22]. The
objectives include providing the country’s
environmental protection agencies with strategic
goals and thematic tasks. The content of the BiH
ESAP 2030+ will cover seven important areas of
EU environmental policy in accordance with the
sustainable development goals (Figure 3).
The above-mentioned document will clearly
define actions to achieve environmental
sustainability and improve the health of citizens,
unification of the country’s administrative units for
environmental protection. The adoption of the
Federal Environmental Strategy by the government
of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina on
August 25, 2022, was a positive point. The
Environmental Strategy of the Brčko District for
2022-2032 was adopted on November 2, 2022, and
the Environmental Strategy of the Republic of
Srpska was adopted on November 17, 2022. The
film BiH ESAP 2030+ was created to popularize
this environmental initiative in Bosnia and
Herzegovina. This film is shown to students,
followed by a productive discussion with
environmental experts. To move to the next stage of
formal EU accession negotiations, Bosnia and
Herzegovina must make progress on many of the
reform priorities set out by the European
Commission.
Fig. 3: The main areas of EU environmental policy
in accordance with the sustainable development
goals
Before the start of hostilities in 2022, according
to the SDG Index, Ukraine ranked 37th out of 163
countries with a score of 75.7 points out of 100
possible, [16]. Public administration in the field of
environmental protection required reform, especially
in the area of law enforcement and control.
Implementation was to be based on the best
practices of the European Union and OECD
countries, [23]. It was also necessary to improve the
technical regulations based on implemented market
“polluter pays” principles, [24]. It is worth noting
that the information on many trends of the Central
Bank in 2022 is unavailable because of the military
operations on the territory of Ukraine. New
significant risks for the environment and public
health have appeared since the beginning of the
military aggression of the Russian Federation in
Ukraine in 2022. As of May 23, 2022, more than 6
million people from Ukraine have moved to other
countries to escape the conflict. At the same time, at
least 8 million people were displaced inside the
country, [16]. Russia’s full-scale invasion of
Ukraine is characterized by the seizure of the
Zaporizhzhia NPP, strikes on cities, TPPs, and
industrial enterprises with dangerous facilities. This
Abundantly mined territories
Air pollution
Illegal deforestation
Inefficient waste management
Stagnation in increasing the size of protected areas
Water resources
Waste
Biodiversity and nature protection
Air quality, climate and energy
Chemical safety and noise
Sustainable resource management
Environmental management
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
356
Volume 19, 2023
damage has affected the provision and access to
energy, water, food, sanitation, and hygiene.
Damage to the water supply infrastructure has
left about 1.4 million people in Ukraine unable to
use safe water, [24]. Russia’s military operations
have caused damage to 900 protected natural
territories of Ukraine. Their area is about 1.2 million
hectares, [25]. Almost 3 million hectares of forest in
Ukraine became the site of hostilities. Bombing,
trenching, and tunneling have a negative impact on
chernozem. In July 2022, in Ukraine, the National
Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the
Consequences of War developed the Draft Plan for
the Recovery of Ukraine, [26]. Accordingly, five
priority directions were determined (Figure 4).
Fig. 4: Priority areas of post-war environmental restoration of Ukraine
The first direction is aimed at the policy of
mitigating the consequences of climate change and
adapting to them. The second direction includes
environmental safety and effective waste
management. The next direction is focused on the
sustainable use of natural resources. The fourth
priority direction is the preservation of natural
ecosystems, biological diversity, restoration, and
development of protected areas. The fifth direction
is aimed at reforming state management of
environmental protection activities, [26].
5 Discussion
It can be concluded that sustainable development
has been an important political goal in different
countries for more than thirty years. Policy in this
area should be aimed at reducing or eliminating
gaps in space, time, functions, and relationships,
[27]. It is necessary to be careful regarding current
attempts to better define what is sustainable and
how to measure it, [12]. According to researchers,
the stability of the term sustainability is not
always ambiguous, but may even be appropriate in
some circumstances.
It can be stated that the SDGs have important
ecological content, and many environmental targets
are very progressive. As a result of this approach,
the environment has been considered the main
component of development, [3]. It can be concluded
that the environmental components of military
conflicts are attracting more and more attention
from governments, academic circles, and politicians.
Efforts are directed at addressing the environmental
issues throughout the conflict cycle, with a
particular focus on environmental components as a
tool for post-conflict recovery, [28].
It was found that post-war recovery can have
many negative consequences for the environment.
These effects must be addressed and mitigated
where possible, especially as war itself causes
enormous environmental damage, [11]. It is
necessary to create a sustainable environment in
view of the ecological aspect, [8]. The
environmental sustainability aspect should be
included in the post-conflict policy to the maximum
possible extent. Moreover, the responsibility for
ensuring environmental sustainability should be a
national consensus and a requirement of the
international community, [5].
It can be concluded that it is necessary to ensure
adequate funding for environmental protection, a
thorough study of climate change, and the
implementation of sustainable development. Seven
sectors of the environmental policy of Bosnia and
Herzegovina received environmental funding.
Biodiversity, nature conservation, and resource
management received scant funding compared to the
water supply and waste disposal sectors, [13].
According to researchers, decision-making bodies
Preservation of natural ecosystems, biological diversity, restoration and development of protected areas
Mitigation of the consequences of climate change and adaptation to them
Environmental safety and effective waste management
Reforming the state management of environmental protection activities
Sustainable use of natural resources
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
357
Volume 19, 2023
should reorient to obtaining more funding in the
future for sectors that lack financial support.
It can be stated that sustainable development
initiatives can best be implemented by the joint
efforts of the local community. They are based on
social, political, structural, institutional, and
economic dimensions, [9]. Improving shared
governance and strengthening local institutions are
key approaches to developing a variety of
environmental projects during the conflicts and in
the post-war recovery period.
It was established that the war in Ukraine will
lead to inevitable humanitarian and economic
consequences. However, the negative environmental
transformations during the war are dominant,
permanent, and often inevitable for the planet, [10].
All stakeholders, both public and private, have to
undertake the largest reconstruction plan in Europe
since World War II, [14]. If sustainability underpins
recovery and reforms are implemented properly,
these efforts could become a unique opportunity for
Ukraine. Sustainable development in the context of
European integration is a strategic task for the
government of Ukraine, [29]. In the process of post-
war recovery, it is necessary to develop and
implement a new model of eco-social economy
aimed at comprehensively improving the quality of
human life. This will be the foundation for the
European integration process of Ukraine, as the
criteria for sustainable development and
environmental safety will be a top priority.
6 Conclusion
The environment was widely included in the SDGs.
The environmental SDGs include means to improve
the state of the environment. True sustainability and
a truly closed-loop economy can be achieved by
balancing the economic, social, and environmental
components.
Russia’s military aggression in Ukraine with the
use of heavy ground weapons caused casualties
among the population and negative changes in the
natural environment of Ukraine. The Environmental
Security section of the draft Plan for the Recovery
of Ukraine from the War provides an initial
background for sustainable post-war ecological
restoration. In the long run, the completion of the
process of post-war environmental development
should lead to a clean and safe environment. The
sustainable development of Ukraine during the post-
war ecological restoration will contribute to the
acceleration of Ukraine’s accession to the EU and
coordination with key European politicians.
This study has its limitations. For example, the
Bosnian War (1992-1995) used as an example is
significantly distant in time from the Russian-
Ukrainian War that started in 2022. During this
period, significant geopolitical changes have
occurred, complicating comparisons between the
two conflicts. Moreover, the Russian-Ukrainian war
is characterized by threats of a different level,
including environmental threats. To improve the
work and conduct a deeper comparison between the
two countries (Ukraine and Bosnia and
Herzegovina), it was also reasonable to compare
corruption indicators in these countries. High
corruption rates were identified as one of the main
factors in the slowed environmental recovery in
Bosnia and Herzegovina, so this risk needs to be
anticipated and taken into account in the Ukrainian
post-war recovery plans. Further research should
focus on the dynamics of achieving sustainable
development goals by Ukraine before and during the
conflict in order to determine the main direction of
the post-war environmental recovery.
References:
[1] Priyadarshini, P., Dubey, P. K., Singh, A.,
Chaurasia, R., Abhilash, P. C. The Dasgupta
Review: resetting the stage for a new
paradigm, Frontiers in Ecology and the
Environment, Vol. 20, 2021, pp. 240246,
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2451
[2] Aven, T. Climate change risk what is it and
how should it be expressed? Journal of Risk
Research, Vol. 23, No. 11, 2020, pp. 1387-
1404,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1687578
[3] Elder, M., Olsen, S. H. The design of
environmental priorities in the SDGs, Global
Policy, Vol. 10, No. S1, 2019, pp. 7082,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12596
[4] Mualla, W. Academic Research in Support of
Post-Conflict Recovery in Syria, In A. Badran,
E. Baydoun, J. R. Hillman (Eds.), Higher
Education in the Arab World: Research and
Development (pp. 297309), Springer, 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80122-9_17
[5] Suarez, A., Árias-Arévalo, P. A., Martínez-
Mera, E. Environmental sustainability in post-
conflict countries: insights for rural Colombia,
Environment, Development and Sustainability,
Vol. 20, No. 3, 2018, pp. 997-1015,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9925-9
[6] Pereira, P., Bašić, F., Bogunovic, I., Barcelo,
D. Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total
environment, Science of the Total
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
358
Volume 19, 2023
Environment, Vol. 837, 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155865
[7] Fu, B. Several Key Points in Territorial
Ecological Restoration, Bulletin of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2021,
Article 9, https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-
3045.20201222001
[8] Al-Samurai, A. A. R. M., Al-Qaraghuli, A. S.
R. Adopting sustainable development in
reconstruction Post War City of Mosul
Architecture-Case Study, IOP Conf. Series:
Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 754,
2021, pp. 012001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-
1315/754/1/012001
[9] Ozili, P. K. Sustainability and Sustainable
Development Research around the World,
Managing Global Transitions, Vol. 20, No. 3,
2022, pp. 259293,
https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.20.259-
293
[10] Khan, M. The environmental impacts of war
and conflict, K4D Helpdesk Report, Institute of
Development Studies, 2022,
https://doi.org/10.19088/K4D.2022.060
[11] O’Driscoll, D. Good Practice in Post-Conflict
Reconstruction. K4D Helpdesk. Institute of
Development Studies, 2018, Online available
from
https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.
500.12413/14263
[12] Dogmus, Ö. C., Nielsen, J. Ø. Defining
sustainability? Insights from a small village in
Bosnia and Herzegovina, GeoJournal, Vol. 86,
2020, pp. 21652181,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10181-9
[13] Causevic, A., Avdic, S., Padegimas, B.,
Macura, B. Analysis of international public
funding flows for the environment, climate
change, and sustainability: the case of Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Energy, Sustainability and
Society, Vol. 12, 2022, аrticle number: 34,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00359-z
[14] Beckmann, A., Lucius, I., Nantsou, T.,
Riabokin, T., Vykhor, B., Abbara, M., Aixala,
A., Corak, T., Hassan, F., Kachaner, N.
Ukraine - A Sustainable Economic Recovery
for People and Nature, WWF, CEE, BCG,
2022, Online available from
https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/
ukraine___a_sustainable_economic_recovery_
for_people_and_nature___wwf_bcg___sept_2
022_light.pdf
[15] UN Sustainable Development Summit.
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development, 2015, Online
available from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[16] UN SDGs Report. The Sustainable
Development Goals Report 2022, 2022, Online
available from
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/
[17] ECE. Environmental Performance Reviews.
Bosnia and Herzegovina, New York and
Geneva: United Nations, 2004, Online
available from
https://unece.org/DAM/env/epr/epr_studies/bos
nia_and_herzegovina.pdf
[18] IATI. Country development finance data.
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2022, Online
available from
https://countrydata.iatistandard.org/
[19] Transparency International. Corruption
Perceptions Index, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
2022, Online available from
https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2018/inde
x/bih
[20] UNDP. On the occasion of World Tourism
Day, UNDP officially presented the new
project “Sustainability of Protected Areas in
BiH SPA”, 2022, Online available from
https://www.undp.org/bosnia-
herzegovina/news/occasion-world-tourism-
day-undp-officially-presented-new-project-
sustainability-protected-areas-bih-spa
[21] UNECE. 3rd Environmental Performance
Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2018,
Online available from
https://unece.org/environment-
policy/publications/3rd-environmental-
performance-review-bosnia-and-herzegovina
[22] BiH ESAP 2030+. Development of the
Environmental Strategy and Action Plan of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Fact sheet, SEI,
2021, Online available from
https://www.sei.org/wp-
content/uploads/2019/11/bih-esap-2030-fact-
sheet.pdf
[23] European Commission. Ukraine: Commission
presents plans for the Union's immediate
response to address Ukraine's financing gap
and the longer-term reconstruction, 2022,
Online available from
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/de
tail/en/ip_22_3121
[24] OECD. Environmental impacts of the war in
Ukraine and prospects for a green
reconstruction, 2022, Online available from
https://www.oecd.org/ukraine-hub/policy-
responses/environmental-impacts-of-the-war-
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
359
Volume 19, 2023
in-ukraine-and-prospects-for-a-green-
reconstruction-9e86d691/
[25] Ministry of Environmental Protection and
Natural Resources of Ukraine. Briefing on the
environmental damage caused by the Russian
invasion of Ukraine, 2022, Online available
from https://mepr.gov.ua/en/news/39144.html
[26] National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine
from the War. Project of the Recovery Plan of
Ukraine. Materials of the working group
“Environmental safety”, 2022, Online
available from
https://www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/re
coveryrada/ua/environmental-safety-
assembly.pdf
[27] Bonnedahl, K. J., Heikkurinen, P., Paavola, J.
Strongly sustainable development goals:
Overcoming distances constraining responsible
action, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol.
129, 2022, pp. 150-158,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.004
[28] Buryak, E. V., Redko, K. Yu., Chornovol, A.
O., & Orlenko, O. V. (2022). Socio-economic
aspects of sustainable development of Ukraine
in the conditions of war (European integration
aspects). Scientific Notes of the Lviv University
of Business and Law. Economic series. Legal
Series, 34, 135143.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7221052
[29] Bliznjuk, O., Masalitina, N., Myronenko, L.,
Zhulinska, O., Denisenko, T., Nekrasov, S.,
Stankevych, S., Bragin, O., Romanov, O.,
Romanova, T. Determination of Rational
Conditions for Oil Extraction From Oil
Hydration Waste, Eastern-European Journal of
Enterprise Technologies, Vol. 1 (6 (115)),
2022, pp. 1723, Online available from
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4069061
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare
that is relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.31
Iryna Alieksieienko, Viktoriia Koltun,
Nataliia Grynchuk,
Volodymyr Vakulenko, Oksana Kohut
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
360
Volume 19, 2023