The full dataset used in Fig. 1 is at the Appendix
section. These rates are age-standardized, meaning
they assume a constant age structure of the
population: this allows for comparison between
countries and over time.
Organization guidelines for acceptable PM2.5
exposures. The observed average of PM2.5
exposures in Albania for the present year is 15.4
μg/m3 while the acceptable annual average
according to WHO should not exceed 10 μg/m3. Air
pollution is the result of many factors such, as the
reduction of urban green spaces, non-efficient waste
management, or the use of non-conventional fuel.
However, the main reason for air pollution in
Albania seems to be vehicle emissions, where old
diesel vehicles remain problematic. Different ways
have been explored to reduce air pollution,
especially in urban areas. One of these ways is
encouraging citizens to use public transport, [2].
However, in Albania and especially in the capital
city of Tirana. There is a very high level of use of
private cars. In 2020, Tirana is ranked first, among
the European capital with the most polluted air, [3].
This is also confirmed by the measurements of NO2
concentration. The main purpose article analyzes the
efficiency of 15 public transport lines and identifies
the factors that would improve their performance.
The efficiency analysis is conducted by using the
DEA mathematical model, which consists of the
results of the relative efficiency of similar units that
use some inputs and produce some inputs, [4]. To
estimate the pollution from public transportation, we
will use the Statistics in Tirana’s SDS indicate that
36% of residents are active users of public transport;
27% use their private cars; and the rest are classified
as using alternatives, such as bicycles, motorcycle,
and walking, [5]. The actual public transport fleet
consists of 305 buses, out of which only 65 buses
comply with Euro-V/VI standards on combustion
emissions. According to data provided by the
Municipality of Tirana, the combined public
transport capacity (seats and standing volume) is
30,365 passengers, with only 31% of this capacity
consisting.
2 Literature Review
To investigate the urban public route's efficiency
utilizing the "data envelopment analysis (DEA)"
technique. To analyze route performance, DEA is
using, and performance measures including route
design, cost, service, operation, and comfort
efficiency. Transit performance was studied by
many transportations, [6], showing that the DEA
application is very significant in the urban transport
area. Moreover, [7], applied a non-parametric DEA
procedure to estimate the productive efficiency of a
transit system. Furthermore, [8], used DEA to assess
the US transit systems' efficiency for five years;
they found the existence of positive relations
between efficiency and effectiveness Transit system
produces multiple outputs consuming multiple
inputs. There had been a debate about which of
those parameters defines the overall performance of
public transit. [9], used operation time, round-trip
distance, and the number of the bus stop as inputs to
measure operational efficiency whereas commuters
who use buses, population 65 and older, and persons
with disabilities were used as inputs to measure
spatial effectiveness. [10], used fuel consumption,
number of full-time workers, and number of
operating buses as the input variables. [11], used
average travel time per round trip, number of
vehicles, operators, and the total number of stops in
the round trip as input variables. Input variables can
be modified by the researchers as per the
requirements and scope of their study as long as
they include the major operating and maintenance
cost of the system. [12], used output variables: total
average number of passengers per day as an
effective measure and vehicle km per day as an
efficiency measure. The main purpose of this
article is to analyse the efficiency of 15 public
transport lines and to identify the factors that would
improve their performance. The efficiency analysis
is conducted by using the DEA mathematical model,
which consists of the results of the relative
efficiency of similar units that use some inputs and
produce some outputs. DEA can employ various
output variables as performance indicators as per the
scope of the study. Choosing the input and output
variables as being a critical state, special attention
should be given considering the direction of the
study. The model DEA not only enables us to
measure the performance of urban lines in the study,
but it also shows us the way to improve the
efficiency of the transport lines, which during the
study, resulted in relatively low performance. The
aim is of course to increase competition between
urban lines and encourage them to satisfy and fulfill
the needs and expectations of the population. The
results of the study serve as feedback to improve the
quality of public transport in the referred lines and
throughout the country.
3 Methodology
The DEA is a non-parametric method applied to
compare the efficiency measurement of several units
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2023.19.26
Mariana Nikolla, Jona Mulliri,
Artur Ribaj, Alba Tema