Short Review on organic food supply chain management in Malaysia
ABDULLAH E M F ALRASHIDI1, WALEED FEKRY FARIS1, AHMAD M S ARAFAT 2
1 Department Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)
2 Management, Limkokwing University
MALAYSIA
Abstract: - The organic food market has not reached its maturity yet in Malaysia. Consumers of organic food
have increased in the last year. The development of organic food supply chain management shows substantial
opportunities. Although it is only a small part of the food market, it gains the interest of consumers researchers
and businessmen. Consumers became interested to know if the food they purchase is fully organic and what are
the activities involved in the supply chain management of the organic food. This paper will discuss the factor that
affects organic food supply chain management in Malaysia. In addition to that, the study discusses Malaysia’s
policy in certifying organic food and standards. Also, the challenges facing food supply chain management. This
paper will give a short review of the importance of organic food supply chain management in Malaysia which
will give the reader a clear view of the standards and concepts of organic food in Malaysia.
Key-Words: - Supply chain management, organic food, Malaysia, organic food policy.
Received: August 19, 2021. Revised: June 3, 2022. Accepted: June 14, 2022. Published: June 27, 2022.
1 Background of the study
Organic food and drinks are the new trends
nowadays. people are concerned for their health and
what they eat. Organic food can be defined as food
that is grown without using artificial chemicals or
hormones antibiotics or genetically modified
organisms. Organic foods also include fresh produce,
meats, and dairy products as well as processed foods
such as crackers, drinks, and frozen meals.
Organic foods are fresh foods like dairy, meats, and
freshly processed foods. Unlike genetically modified
organisms, organic foods are grown and processed
without synthetic fertilizers and chemicals. Organic
agriculture relies on the health of ecosystems and
soils. The supply chain value of these foods lies in
tradition, science, and innovation, looking up to
benefit the environment and people. Organic
producers have production norms upheld in all
stages, from seeding, and processing, to packaging
for consumers [1][2][3]. The process of natural and
organic farming has been becoming popular among
developing nations. North America is the largest
organic domestic market, and Europe is the largest
producer. The Middle East and Asia are third-world
countries where organic foods are broadly demanded
to eliminate poverty.
Because of the increasing population in the Middle
East, demand for food and beverages has increased.
Despite the expansion in population, people are still
looking for healthy and fresh foods over GMOs. The
GCC is the leading organic food market in the region,
mainly Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Informal content
creators and social media use has inspired the value
of staying healthy and immunity. Organic products
and chemical-free foods have become parts of
extensive conversations as people look to consume
plant-based foods [4][5][6].
The government in the UAE is focused on supporting
local organic foods. The ministry of environment in
the nation is committed to analyzing the soil,
improving farming quality, and verifying the absence
of chemicals twice a year. Positive attitudes toward
organic foods have improved organic farming, and
public institutions support the supply chain process.
End customers include restaurants that have
established their independent farms to ensure direct
sourcing of organic raw materials for their
specialized menus. Consumer perceptions are the
driving factors in the organic foods supply chain
Fig.1.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.89
Abdullah E. M. F. Alrashidi,
Waleed Fekry Faris, Ahmad M. S. Arafat
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
937
Volume 18, 2022
Fig.1: Consumption of Organic Food in the UAE [7]
Organic food production and agriculture in Asia have
substantially grown. Corporate agri-food actors have
evolved through discursive and structural power
forms. Distribution in the region is domestic and
international because the rates of productivity growth
have created room for exports. The development of
the urban middle class in Southeast Asia has
popularized organic foods in the corporate retail
sector. With the government’s support, small-scale
farmers have gotten certifications and increased
access to the markets [8][9][10]. Corporate retailers
are used as intermediaries to like farmers to be local
and commercial markets. Certification and
commercialization of organic foods have attracted
more organic food suppliers and farmers in Asia.
Indonesia and China have the most prominent export-
oriented and domestic organic foods market.
Certification in Indonesia has led to organic
production of $250 million, increasing exports and
streamlining the supply chain [11][12][13][14]. EU
regulations and local government certification
regulate organic land in China. Private standards
have made regulatory agencies and governments a
part of the organic production supply chain. Organic
food has helped eliminate poverty in China [15][16].
Overpopulation created a food crisis and poverty, but
the growth of organic fresh foods provides domestic
consumption and generates revenue through exports.
Main exported organic products include soybeans,
herbal beans, green tea, and processed vegetables.
European organic foods are distributed through
different retail sectors. Some of the retail outlets
include supermarkets in France and Belgium. Spain,
Greece, and Ireland. There are specialized shops for
distributing organic foods. Discount stores are also
standard in Austrian and German markets for selling
organic foods. There are still struggles with market
realities discrepancies and value chain delivery
systems in the organic food industry [17][18]. Long
retail chains are used to add value to the products and
increase the distribution density. These are the most
common channels for retail food exports from
Europe. Short channels add value through sustainable
production methods, and food is sourced from the
producers directly Fig 2. The region has been
working to overcome supply chain challenges like
poor reliability, lack of alignment, different values,
and limited chain members’ collaboration.
Fig.2 sales channels proffered for organic food
purchase [19]
Organic farming has grown in popularity, and they
are a sustainable means for empowering middle-class
consumers and local farmers in Europe, Asia, and the
Middle East. Most of these regions have improved
organic production beyond domestic markets. Direct
channels are used to supply to grocery and speciality
stores. Conventional marketing channels have
become popular as supermarkets and hypermarkets
are used to increase organic food sales. The value
chain of organic foods depends on the products'
composition, quality, prices, and convenience.
The organic food market has not reached its maturity
yet. It is growing and developing especially in Asian
countries. Malaysia is one of the countries that’s
known for its agriculture [20][21].
2 Overview of organic food supply
chain management (OFSCM)
The main reasons behind using organic food are
human health and environmental sustainability. The
main challenge of organic food is the gain of people's
trust that the food is organically grown. The
certification and labels are given to prove what makes
a successful business in this area. The organic food
industry grew from small niche stores into
mainstream markets. The distribution channel
numbers depend on the increasing numbers of stores
that accept to promote organic food at a competitive
price. Also, the consumers' opinions matter a lot in
the case of organic food. Especially that processed
organic food has a long way to compete with the
artificially processed food that is cheaper and easily
the taste can satisfy the consumers [22][23][24].
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
YES NO
Consumption of Organic Food
Producer
31%
Pharmacy
20%
Supermarket
25%
Specialized Store
23%
Elsewhere
1%
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.89
Abdullah E. M. F. Alrashidi,
Waleed Fekry Faris, Ahmad M. S. Arafat
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
938
Volume 18, 2022
3 Factors enhancing organic food
supply chain management in Malaysia
Organic food production is linked to a healthy
agricultural ecosystem. Instead of using modified
chemical fertilizers, organic farmers rely on dynamic
organic cycles, rich biodiversity, and biotic soil
activities. Using synthetic fertilizers is polluting the
environment, so organic farmers go for
environmentally friendly means. Consumers around
the world are increasingly choosing organic foods
because it is a safer healthier option despite costing
20%100% more than conventional foods. Organic
food demand is a new concept in Malaysia, although
60% of organic products are imported, there is rapid
growth in the market of organic food in Malaysia.
Local demand has increased due to an increase in
consumers’ interest in organic foods, especially after
the pandemic crisis [25][26][27]. Health
consciousness has become a significant motivator for
organic food purchases. Malaysia has created
agricultural policies that regulate farming and
promote organic food production. Public trust for
organic foods has increased after introducing
certification and food standards for organic farmers
and distributors. The paper discusses the Malaysian
certificate and standard for organic food. Malaysia
uses its certification policy and regulatory measures
to manage organic food after increased local
consumption and increasing export efforts [28][29].
3.1 Organic Food Certificate
Certification of organic farming and food began with
the Malaysia Organic Certification Scheme known as
the MS 1529. The scheme provided the specific
standards to be followed and a logo to show that the
products meet organic standards. The MOS logo was
for plant-based food products, excluding livestock
and processed food. Farmers conducting primary
fresh organic foods production participated in this
certification scheme. Trained officers would inspect
farms to ensure compliance with organic standards. It
was the certification system that began the
development of Malaysian organic agriculture.
Farmers received MOS accreditation for local and
export organic products.
The Malaysian Organic Certification Program
expanded after organic food has gained popularity in
the country. The agriculture department created the
Malaysian Standard MS1529:2001 to regulate all
organic plant and animal-based products. The four
principles for the certification program are care,
fairness, ecology, and health. Farmers have to grow
food that promotes the health of plants, soils, and
humans. Meeting the balance and fairness of an
ecological ecosystem makes producers in Malaysia
MOS certified. The certification follows the EU
organic certification principles that define organic
production as a farming and food production system
that follows climate action regulations and
environmental standards. The Malaysian government
is prioritizing the production of foods using natural
processes and substances (Sulaiman, 2020). Between
2016 and 2020, the government managed to improve
organic farmers’ income by 26.7%. Organic
production has become a dual social role where it
responds to the increasing demand for natural
products while responding to animal welfare,
environmental protection, and national development
efforts.
The entire organic food value chain is regulated from
any harmful practices. Qualified products are
completely synthetic-free. Local farmers are
increasing investing in organic farming because it is
natural and cost-friendly. In addition to that, 87% of
consumers prefer certified organic foods because
they are healthier [31]. Certification helps build
consumer trust because it is proof that the food
products are free from synthetic additives,
irradiation, and harmful industrial solvents [32]. The
regulatory framework is stringent, and the label is
reassuring to consumers. The entire organic food
supply chain feels responsible for protecting the
environment by consuming foods without chemical
residues. Certification is proof of non-toxicity in the
organic food produced by the farmers or exported
from abroad.
The Malaysian certification standard covers all stages
in the value chain. The logo is included in the
production, handling, marketing, and labelling of
organic products because it is proof of compliance.
Certification protects consumers and producers from
fraud and deception through unsubstantiated claims.
Malaysia has been increasingly exporting organic
products, and the certification shows a focus on
international standards. The certification is given
after three years of producing and processing organic
foods. Farmers should apply ethical farming
practices like mulching, crop revolution, hand
weeding, intercropping, thick planting, and other
practices that improve soil health [33]. With the
department of agriculture implementing and
monitoring standards, all organic food producers
must adhere to all standards. Certified farms are
examined by the Malaysian DOA each year and 240
have been certified by 2020 [34]. The government
interest and participation in the organic food supply
chain means there will be accreditation scheme
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.89
Abdullah E. M. F. Alrashidi,
Waleed Fekry Faris, Ahmad M. S. Arafat
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
939
Volume 18, 2022
changes to respond to new standards and
preferences.
3.2 Organic Food Standards
The government’s commitment to organic food
production has led to the introduction of the organic
agricultural practice. There is a standard built for the
Farm Certification Scheme for good practices.
Malaysia has an integrated system that manages any
production hazards that deal with the farm, input,
process, and output of organic agricultural
production. The standard ensures that anyone offered
the certification scheme maintains sustainability, and
productivity and provides socially acceptable
products [35]. The standards are measured during
every inspection to ensure all processes are followed,
and foods meet safety and quality standards.
Malaysian Standard MS1784 follows national hazard
control laws related to food safety, consumer health,
and environmental protection.
The standard document is crucial because it is used
as a reference point by key organic production
players like farmers and producers. The guiding rules
lie under a ‘must’ and ‘encouraged’ spectrum. Some
of the rules are mandatory and certified members
must follow them to achieve Good Agricultural
Practice objectives. Farmers must strictly follow the
standards because they are the first step in the supply
chain [36][37]. Non-compliance means losing
certification and facing sustainability and food safety
legal action from the department of agriculture.
Encouraged rules are not mandatory in organic food
production, but they make the process better. Impacts
are not hazardous if these rules are not followed.
They are ethical organic agriculture practices like
hand weeding and intercropping. If the encouraged
standards are ignored, it is not a threat to food safety,
environmental well-being, and ecosystem
sustainability. Good Agricultural Practice has
become a priority in Malaysia as the awareness about
organic foods improved and production expanded to
an international scale.
Increased local production and government
involvement in Malaysian agricultural practices has
popularized organic supply chain certification and
regulation standards. Although organic agriculture is
still a new concept in Malaysia, it has made massive
progress through consumer awareness and
government recognition. The regulatory system
creates a solid organic food supply chain system and
achieves national agriculture objectives. Although
the certification process might be too complex for
small-scale farmers, they have made notable progress
in familiarizing themselves with the process
[38][39][40]. The certification and standards are
necessary to ensure organic farmers and retailers
meet food quality and safety standards. The
Malaysian Department of agriculture needs to
identify small-scale organic farmers who might need
assistance understanding and meeting organic
certification and Good Agricultural Practice
standards [41].
4 Supply chain management
challenges in the Malaysian organic
food market
Malaysia’s organic food sector-main problem is the
Inconsistency between market realities, the value
delivery system and the value chain. For organic food
in Malaysia the separate distribution can be described
as long channels and short channels, where in long
channels the retail chains add the value through the
price and high distribution intensity, while in short
channels directly from the producers, they add value
through manufacture methods and sustainably
practices [42].
The structure and performance of organic food
supply chain management is the main concern of
most studies. Issues concerning structure and
performance are high operating cost, poor reliability
of supply, lack of collaboration among chain
members, the sources of motivation are different for
the people who represent the chain and the values as
well and most importantly lack of information flow.
In addition to that, supply chain management (SCM)
faces challenges regarding the food origin and
distance to import it, the size of the farms and the
market unpredictability. The distance from the place
of production until it reaches the consumer affects the
idea of organic food which in many cases it can be
ruined if the time of production and transportation is
long. Such as some types of vegetables where it
cannot last as long as the non-organic. In this regards
the origin of organic food plays a big role in the
predictive and confidence value of the product. The
organic food sector is mainly owned by privet
businesses such as families that manage small farms.
Usually, these farms are affected majorly by the
economic scale [43].
The instability of organic food is defined by the
fact that fresh produce is perishable, also they are
seasonal, in addition to the fact they depend on the
change in the climate. These characteristics affect the
certainty of the market price and quantities highly.
This has discouraged the organic food owners from
getting into contracts in the produce trade.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.89
Abdullah E. M. F. Alrashidi,
Waleed Fekry Faris, Ahmad M. S. Arafat
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
940
Volume 18, 2022
In regard to the distribution of the organic food
strategies, there are two types of sales channels. The
first one is the hypermarkets which are the most
popular in Malaysia, and the second one is a direct
sale where the organic product is sold directly
through specialist stores [44][45].
The market for organic food is growing in Malaysia.
And the number of stores and organic brands is
increasing. Malaysia's market also depends on
exporting organic products from neighbouring
countries such as Australia.
The operating price of organic products is very high
compared with non-organic products. this affects the
supply chain management of organic food. Also, the
weak communication between supply chain members
slows down the process of OFSCM [46].
5 Conclusion
This paper discussed the challenges and concept of
organic food supply chain management. Growing
organic food requires traditional methods that do not
include using artificial chemicals. Traditional
methods require more manpower and time. This
plays a big part in the supply chain management of
organic food. In order to meet the demand of the
customers, the food must be available as a
replacement for non-organic. While nowadays food
is produced in large number and artificial methods
are practised, which require a market of organic food
that interest a small number of customers people in
the present. This market can grow although the
population is growing, due to the increasing
awareness of health and the bad effect of non-organic
food in Malaysia. Many challenges face the supply
chain of organic food in Malaysia.
Including producing an organic product that
competes with the non-organic which is 20%-100%
cheaper than organic food. Malaysia’s supply chain
management must be improved in terms of
shortening the time transporting the product from the
farm to the shelf and reducing the price of organic
products. Communication between retail and farmers
must be improved. And the production of organic
products must increase locally instead of exporting
from abroad. It is suggested to work on supply chain
mapping and traceability to improve the OFSCM.
References:
[1] Al-Taie, W. A., Rahal, M. K., AL-Sudani, A.
S., & AL-Farsi, K. A. (2015). Exploring the
consumption of organic foods in the United Arab
Emirates. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015592001
[2] Dovleac, L. (2016). An overview on the
supply chain for European organic food market.
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov,
9(58), 325-330.
http://webbut.unitbv.ro/BU2016/Series%20V/BULE
TIN%20I/33_Dovleac.pdf
[3] Qiao, Y., Martin, F., Cook, S., He, X.,
Halberg, N., Scott, S., & Pan, X. (2018). Certified
organic agriculture as an alternative livelihood
strategy for small-scale farmers in China: A case
study in Wanzai County, Jiangxi province.
Ecological Economics, 145, 301-307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.025
[4] Schreer, V., & Padmanabhan, M. (2019).
The many meanings of organic farming: Framing
food security and food sovereignty in Indonesia.
Organic Agriculture, 10(3), 327-338.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00277-z
[5] Vieira, L. M., Barcellos, M. D., Hoppe, A.,
& Silva, S. B. (2013). An analysis of value in an
organic food supply chain. British Food Journal,
115(10), 1454-1472. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-06-
2011-0160
[6] Wang, C. (2019). Performing and counter‐
performing organic food markets in East Asia: The
role of ahimsa, scientific knowledge and faith groups.
The Geographical Journal, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12338
[7] Rahmat, S. R., Khan, H. H., Radin
Badaruddin, R. F., Mohamad, M. F., & Samsurijan,
M. S. (2021). A Review of Organic Agriculture
Industry in Malaysia and Gross Margin between
Organic and Conventional Plantation. Journal of
Contemporary Issues in Business and Government,
27(3), 329-338.
[8] Mohamad, S.S.; Rusdi, S.D.; Hashim, N.H.
Organic food consumption among urban consumers:
Preliminary results. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014,
130, 509514. [CrossRef]
[9] Dardak, R.A.; Abidin, A.Z.Z.; Ali, A.K.
Consumers’ perception, comsumption, and
preference on organic product: Malaysian
perspective. Econ. Technol. Manag. Rev. 2009, 4,
95107.
[10] A New Beginning for Organic Food
Industry. Available online:
http://www.asean.org/communities (accessed on 7
August 2015).
[11] Organic Food Standards and Labels: The
Facts. Available online: http://www.ams.usda.gov
(accessed on 6 August 2015).
[12] Willer, H.; Lernoud, J. The World of Organic
Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2015;
Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL):
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.89
Abdullah E. M. F. Alrashidi,
Waleed Fekry Faris, Ahmad M. S. Arafat
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
941
Volume 18, 2022
Frick, Switzerland; IFOAMOrganics
International: Bonn, Germany, 2015.
[13] Horticulturae 2016, 2, 12 5 of 5
[14] Tiraieyari, N.; Hamzah, A.; Samah, B.A.
Organic Farming and Sustainable Agriculture in
Malaysia: Organic Farmers’ Challenges towards
Adoption Asian Social Science. Asian Soc. Sci.
2014.
[15] Stanton, E.S. Malaysia’s Markets for
Functional Foods, Nutraceuticals and Organic Foods:
An Introduction for Canadian Producers and
Exporters. The Counsellor and Regional Agri-Food
Trade Commissioner, Southeast Asia, and the High
Commission of Canada in Malaysia; Agriculture and
Agri-Food Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2011.
[16] Saleki, Z.S.; Saleki, S.M.S. The main factors
influencing purchase behaviour of organic products
in Malaysia. Interdiscip. J. Contemp. Res. Bus. 2012,
4, 98116.
[17] Zhong R Y, Xu X and Wang L 2017 Food
supply chain management: systems,
implementations, and future research Ind. Manag.
Data Syst., 117 20852114
[18] Fritz M and Schiefer G 2008 Food chain
management for sustainable food system
development: A European research Agenda
Agribusiness 4 440452
[19] Yakovleva N 2007 Editorial introduction:
Measuring the sustainability of the food system,” J.
Environ. Policy Plan. 9 13
[20] Xu X and Gursoy D 2015 Influence of
sustainable hospitality supply chain management on
customers’ attitudes and behaviors Int. J. Hosp.
Manag. 49 105116
[21] Kim H and Lee C W 2018 The effects of
customer perception and participation in sustainable
supply chain management: A smartphone industry
study Sustainability 10 227190
[22] Lyons K, Burch D, Lawrence G A, and
Lockie S 2004 Contrasting paths of corporate
greening in Antipodean agriculture: organics and
green production Agribusiness and Society.
Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market
Opportunities and Public Regulation ed K. Jansen
and S. Vellema (London: Zed Books) pp. 91113.
[23] Vermeir I and Verbeke W 2006 Sustainable
food consumption: exploring the consumer ‘attitude
behavioral intention’ gap J. Agric. Environ. Ethics
19, 169194
[24] Shaharudin M R, Pani J, Mansor S W, and
Elias S 2010 Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of
Organic Food in Malaysia’s Kedah State Cross-
Cultural Commun. 6 105116
[25] Gupta V, Abidi N, and Bandyopadhayay A
2013 Supply Chain Management - A Three-
Dimensional Framework J. Manag. Res. 5 7697
[26] Ahmad S, Wong K Y, and Elahi H 2017
Sustainability assessment and analysis of Malaysian
food manufacturing sectorA move towards
sustainable development Adv. Sci. Lett. 23 894246
[27] Maestrini V, Luzzini D, Maccarrone P, and
Caniato F 2017 Supply chain performance
measurement systems: A systematic review and
research agenda Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183 299315
[28] Aramyan L H, Lansink A, van der Vorst J,
and van Kooten O 2007 Performance measurement
in agri-food supply chains: a case study Supply Chain
Manag. Int. J. 12 304315
[29] Coad A, de Haan P, and Woersdorfer J S
2009 Consumer support for environmental policies:
An application to purchases of green cars Ecol. Econ.
68 207886
[30] Shove E 2010 Beyond the ABC: Climate
change policy and theories of social change Environ.
Plan. A 42 127385
[31] Carter C R and Rogers D S 2008 A
framework of sustainable supply chain management:
Moving toward new theory Int. J. Phys. Distrib.
Logist. Manag. 38 360387
[32] Bourlakis M, Maglaras G, Aktas E, Gallear
D, and Fotopoulos C 2014 Firm size and sustainable
performance in food supply chains: Insights from
Greek SMEs Int. J. Prod. Econ. 152 112130
[33] Ahmad A, Hami A N, Shafie S, and Mat
Yamin F 2018 A proposed framework of sustainable
manufacturing practice and sustainability
performance among Malaysian SMEs in the
manufacturing sector Proceedings of the 2nd
Conference on Technology & Operations
Management pp. 159168.
[34] Abdul-Rashid S H, Sakundarini N, Raja
Ghazilla R A, and Thurasamy R 2017 The impact of
sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability
performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia Int.
J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37 182204
[35] Abdullah R, Hassan M G, and Johari N A
2014 Exploring the Linkage of Supply Chain
Integration between Green Supply Chain Practices
and Sustainable Performance: a Conceptual Link Int.
Proc. Chem. Biol. Environ. Eng. 61
[36] Handfield R, Sroufe R, and Walton S 2005
Integrating environmental management and supply
chain strategies Bus. Strateg. Environ., 14 1-19
37. Chopra S, Laux C, Schmidt E, and Rajan P
2017 Perception of Performance Indicators in an
Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Case Study of India’s
Public Distribution System Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 8
130145
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.89
Abdullah E. M. F. Alrashidi,
Waleed Fekry Faris, Ahmad M. S. Arafat
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
942
Volume 18, 2022
[38] Sari E, Shaharoun A M, and Ma’aram A
2014 Preliminary Framework of Sustainable
Maintenance Performance Measurement Systems for
Automotive Companies,” Adv. Mater. Res. 845 590
595
[39] Dong B, Sivakumar K, Evans K R, and Zou
S 2015 Effect of Customer Participation on Service
Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Participation
Readiness,” J. Serv. Res. 18 160176.
[40] Ashaolu, T. J., & Ashaolu, J. O. (2020).
Perspectives on the trends, challenges and benefits of
green, smart and organic (GSO) foods. International
Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100273
[41] Aziz, M. F., Mispan, M. S., & Don, F.
(2020). Organic Food Policy and Regulation in
Malaysia: Development and Challenges. In B. C.
GOH & R. Price (eds.). Regulatory issues in organic
food safety in the Asia Pacific (pp. 151-170).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3580-
2_10
[42] Kashif, U., Hong, C., Naseem, S., Khan, W.
A., & Akram, M. W. (2020). Consumer preferences
toward organic food and the moderating role of
knowledge: A case of Pakistan and Malaysia. Ciência
Rural, 50(5). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-
8478cr20190842
[43] Nathan, R. J., Soekmawati, Victor, V., Popp,
J., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Oláh, J. (2021). Food
innovation adoption and organic food
consumerismA cross-national study between
Malaysia and Hungary. Foods, 10(2).
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020363
[44] Putri, K., Abdullah, Z., Raza, S. H., &
Istiyanto, S. B. (2021). Contrariwise obesity through
organic food consumption in Malaysia: A signaling
theory perspective. Creative Commons Attribution
4.0. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-568134/v1
[45] Senawi, R., Rahman, N. K., Mansor, N., &
Kuntom, A. (2019). Transformation of oil palm
independent smallholders through Malaysian
sustainable palm oil. Journal of Oil Palm Research,
31(3), 496-507.
https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2019.0038
[46] Sulaiman, S. S. (2020). Regulating Good
Agriculture Practices (GAPs) in Enhancing
Sustainability of Halal Food: Malaysian Experience.
Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family
Economics, 24(2), 32-45.
https://www.majcafe.com/wp-
content/uploads/2020/10/Vol-24-S2-2020-Paper-
3.pdf
Contribution of individual authors to
the creation of a scientific article
Abdullah E M F Alrashidi carried out the writing
and research of the article, Waleed Fekry Faris
worked on the editing of the review paper, and
Ahmad M S Arafat was responsible for the
Statistics.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.89
Abdullah E. M. F. Alrashidi,
Waleed Fekry Faris, Ahmad M. S. Arafat
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
943
Volume 18, 2022
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US