Effect of Workplace Diversity on Employee Performance in DSIBS in
Nigeria
JOAN EKHOMEH EHILEBO, HAUWA LAMIDO - ABUBAKAR, DANIEL OGOHI CROSS
Department of Business Administration
Nile University of Nigeria
NIGERIA
Abstract: - The increase in diversity among employees has prompted organizations to begin to craft their
human resource strategy towards better diversity management which in turn will lead to greater employee
performance. This research seeks to investigate the effect of workforce diversity (age, gender and experience)
on employee performance (employee engagement and employee satisfaction) in the five (5) Domestic
Systemically Important Banks (DSIBs) in Nigeria. The study adopted survey research design as its
methodology. Data was collected from 1881 employees in the 5 DSIBs from the six (6) geo-political zones in
Nigeria using questionnaires. Regression analysis and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Maximum
Likelihood was used for data analysis. The results showed a significant positive relationship between workforce
diversity (age, gender and experience) and employee performance. The findings of this study will give
guidelines on the management of workforce diversity in the Banking and financial sector towards improved
employee performance. This study examines the effect of workforce diversity on employee performance in
DSIBs in Nigeria which is a gap that the study sought to fill.
Key-Words: - Workforce Diversity, Age Diversity, Experience Diversity, Gender Diversity, Employee
satisfaction, Employee engagement and Employee performance
Received: August 14, 2021. Revised: May 26, 2022. Accepted: June 11, 2022. Published: June 24, 2022.
1 Introduction
Economic interdependency, immigration and
globalization among others have heralded and
unequivocally justified the continuous propensity of
workplace diversity globally [1], [2]. Workforce
Diversity (WD) refers to acknowledging,
understanding, promoting, appreciating, and
celebrating the multiplicity of workforce identity-
based demographics [3]. According to [4]
performance can be described as the execution of a
task; how well a job is efficiently and effectively
discharged to achieve the desired result. Employee
performance therefore is the efficient and effective
utilization of resources in a dynamic working
environment [1]. It is the measure of output of an
employee relative to inputs while efficiently and
effectively utilizing available resources within the
changing work environment. [5] deduces that an
increase in employee performance will lead to
organizational growth and profitability.
Notwithstanding the inevitability and reality of
workplace diversity globally, documented studies
have longed been contending its significance on
Employee Performance (EP). Some researchers
have constantly stressed the existence of symbiotic
relationship between WD and EP. According to
these studies, recognizing and promoting mosaic of
employees’ workplace visible, invisible and latent
social identities/demographics presents an
organization with a pool of skills, competencies and
knowledgeable staff, promotes creativity, activates
problem-solving, increases commitment, catalyzes
employee satisfaction, reduces absenteeism,
strengthens competitive-edge and engenders
innovation, among others [4], [6][8].
The study highlights the impact of workforce
diversity on employee performance in the selected
five (5) domestic systemically important banks
(DSIBs) in Nigeria. These DSIBs are Zenith Bank;
Guaranty Trust Bank, Access Bank, First Bank and
United Bank of Africa. The Nigerian financial
sector which has been a major contributor to the
growth of the economy, grew by 28.41% (in real
terms) in Q2, 2020 despite the economy contracting
by 6.1%. The DSIBs are defined as "financial
institutions whose distress or disorderly failure,
because of their size, complexity and systemic
interconnectedness, can cause significant disruption
to the wider financial system and economic activity"
of the country. Several researchers have investigated
the workforce diversity employee performance
linkage considering various combination of proxies
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
908
Volume 18, 2022
of workforce diversity from the social category
dimension (gender, age, academic qualification, and
ethnicity) as shown in works by [3], [9][12]. None
of the literatures reviewed have specifically
researched on the effect of WD on the DSIBs in
Nigeria hence the need for this study.
2 Literature Review
2.1 Workforce Diversity
Workforce diversity refers to the similarities and
dissimilarities amongst workers within an
organization from different socio-cultural
backgrounds such as age, gender, ethnicity,
disability, origin, religion etc. [7]. It can be defined
as a strategy which promotes the integration of
various human differences, and the use of diversity
and inclusion polices as a guide in the workplace
[13].
This study adoptd Jehn et al., (1999) diversity
framework (as shown in figure 1 below) which
comprises of three-dimensional layers: Social
Category Diversity (SCD), Informational Category
Diversity (ICD) and Value Diversity (VD). Age,
experience, and gender diversities are used as
proxies of workplace diversity in this study. These
proxies cut across the Social Category Diversity
(SCD) and Informational Category Diversity.
Fig. 1: An adopted framework of Jehn et al (1990)
Workforce Diversity Model
2.1.1 Gender Diversity
Gender-diversity which belongs to the generic
demographic attributes of SCD) can be defined as
physiological conclusion of being a female or male
[14]. Gender describes the masculinity and
femininity of an individual [5], [11]. The study of
gender diversity places emphasis on how male and
female differ in an organization and the variation
that influences the way they react in situations.
Gender diversity has become a trending issue
between academics and practitioners [15]. It focuses
on the differences between male and female and
how these differences affect the manner with which
individuals react to the behaviors of others in the
workplace. Gender diversity, which is the main
source of socially complex and intangible resources
helps to improve creativity, problem-solving and
employee performance [5], [14]. A major
determinant of how successful a team can be is in its
gender diversity because a mixed gender team
possesses a combination of knowledge, skills and
competence which brings about better output [10].
When an organization comprises of employees from
different gender it produces unique experiences and
information when performing tasks [15].
2.1.2 Age Diversity
Age-diversity (which belongs to generic
demographic attributes of SCD) connotes
differences and similarity regarding individual ages.
It is the extent of heterogeneity in a team with
respect to age [16][18]. Age diversity has become
an inevitable part of organizations [19]. An age
diverse workforce is a prerequisite for innovation
and creativity because of the varying values,
knowledge and perspectives it brings in comparison
to a homogenous workforce. In the workplace, age-
group diversity refers to the existence of mixed-age
work teams; whereby different age categories (both
younger and older) or different generations (the
silent-generation 1925-1945, baby-boomers 1946-
1964, generation X 1965-1980, generation Y 1981-
1995 and Generation Z 1996 till date) of employees
can work side-by-side [20]. Value differences in the
various age groups present in the workplace
complement each other which in turn leads to high
performance [21].
2.1.3 Experience Diversity
Experience-diversity (which belongs to Information
Diversity) alludes to heterogeneity of individual’s
stock of past accumulated related occupational
knowledge and skills. It refers to the varying
perspective and knowledge that individuals bring on
board as a result of differences in training, work
experience and educational qualification (Jehn et al.,
1999). It is the processes that promote the
differences, exchange and integration of knowledge
[18], [22]. When groups are formed to solve
problems, the group members come with varying
perspectives and opinions which is important in
improving the team’s creativity [2], [3]. Employees
gather this type of diversity from working in various
organizations over time [13].
In the workplace, experience diversity describes the
knowledge, skills and abilities one acquires while
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
909
Volume 18, 2022
working in a specific field or occupation, usually
from similar previous jobs [23]. Employees should
have knowledge coming from different business
areas. Diversity based on experience brings about
innovation [23]. The variety of experience that
employees have in the organization which is
embedded in social contexts and interactions is
captured in experience diversity [23]. Experience
diversity brings about a wide range of diverse
views, opinions, perspectives and heterogeneity to
the organization [17].
2.2 Employee Performance (EP)
Conceptualizing employee performance has been
highly contentious between theorists and researchers
due to the existence of different index across various
disciplines for its conceptualization. This has led to
lack of consensual clarification, theoretically and
practically in business scholarly literatures. For
instance, it is pervasively defined by some studies
[7], [8], [24], [25] as an “employee’s actual
output/results obtained when measured against its
intended outputs (goals and objectives)”. Major
features of employee performance are input, output,
quality and quality. Some studies [2], [4] noted that
employee performance is not about actual output or
results, but the accomplishment of set targets that
are in alignment with its orientations. It is
considered dependent on organizational dimensions
(wages, job security, job satisfaction) and the
environment where the organization finds itself [7],
[24].
Effective performance is a major factor to the
attainment of business objectives [10], [23], [26]. A
performance appraisal system used to manage
employee performance in the workplace, should be
objective and relevant to the job and the strategic
goals and objectives of the organization. An
organization’s performance is tied to the
performance of the individual members of the firm
[23] so the consequence of workforce diversity at
the employee level is that it has a direct connection
with the progress and development of the
organization. Employee engagement and employee
satisfaction have been chosen for the study as key
indicators of employee performance at work.
2.2.1 Employee Engagement
Engagement refers to the relationship an employee
has with the organization (Collini, 2013). It is a
pragmatic and cognitive state characterized by
diligence, commitment, and enthusiasm (Hapsari et
al., 2019). The connection employees feel towards
their job and their organization which in turn leads
to higher employee performance and productivity is
referred to as employee engagement [8], [27].
Employee engagement can be described as the
degree of dedication, loyalty, and involvement an
employee has towards an organization. It is the
readiness of employees to use their skills and
competence towards the desired growth of the
organization. Employees are willing and
enthusiastic towards giving more effort to the
organization [12], [28].
It is seen as a major source of competitive
advantage, retention of talent, innovation,
organizational effectiveness and helps improve the
performance of an organization [7], [25]. Employees
display their authentic selves and show mental and
emotional absorption when they are fully engaged
[5], [23]. Key drivers of employee engagement
which are organization specific include: feeling
valued and being involved [9]. Components of these
drivers include work environment, leadership, team
and co-worker, training and career, communication,
health and safety, co-operation, compensation,
organizational policies, and workplace well-being
[21], [29]. [28] describes employee engagement as a
major basis for employee performance and team
performance.
2.2.2 Employee Satisfaction
Employee Satisfaction (ES) is defined as a positive
or pleasant emotional state resulting from a person’s
appreciation of his/her own job or experience” [10],
[30]. It is a favorable and positive disposition
towards something because of the expectation
placed on it. It stands for the wholeness of the job in
terms of the employee’s expectations and how
various components of the work environment are
perceived [23], [28]. Whether employees are happy
matters for large multinational firms, small and
medium-sized organizations alike. Employees that
are satisfied with their jobs engage in more
citizenship behavior and are more likely to commit
to remaining in the organization [23]. Employee
satisfaction is significant when it comes to defining
organizational success, particularly in the banking
industry. The need to enhance employee satisfaction
is critical because it is the key to better business
operations as it increases long-term employee
productivity [19], [28]. Employee satisfaction can
therefore be described as an optimistic state which is
a result of the appraisal from the employee’s job.
There are numerous theories that accurately
theorized WD-EP relation. The rationale behind
WD is to ensure workforce competence (through
improved skills, knowledge, competence level,
capabilities and abilities) which is needed for
competitiveness and competitive edge in the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
910
Volume 18, 2022
present-day rapidly dynamic business environment.
Resource-Based Theory is used to underpin this
study. Resource Based Theory postulated [7],
reinforced by [2], [27] is a popular theoretical
framework in management. It purposes that
organizations’ resources is a key factor for
achieving sustainable competitive advantage and
high organizational performance when they posses
certain unique characteristics such as: being rare,
valuable and imitable (Delery and Roumpi, 2017).
Criticisms of the RBT is that it does not consider the
influence of the external environment and that
holding valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-
substitutable resources is necessary but not
sufficient enough for firms to achieve a competitive
advantage (Sirmon et al.,2007).
2.3 Workforce Diversity and Employee
Performance
Previous studies analyzed the effect of workforce
diversity on employee performance. Shrestha and
Parajuli (2021) in their study on the impact of
workforce diversity on employee performance using
four commercial banks in Nepal with proxies for
workforce diversity being age, gender, education
and ethnicity revealed that gender and age have a
positive impact on employee performance. While
[8], [17] in their research on the effect of workforce
diversity on performance found that ethnicity, age
and education diversity also have a positive effect
on performance. Similarly, [18] also undertook a
study on the effect of workforce diversity and
employee performance in the oil and gas sector and
it was concluded that gender and age diversities
have a positive relationship with employee
performance.
[6] in their work on the role of gender and ethnicity
diversity on performance of employees from five (5)
IT companies in Delhi and NCR revealed that there
is a significant positive impact of gender and
ethnicity diversity on the performance of employees
in the organization. Similarly, [17] in researching on
the effect of workforce diversity on employee
performance in Nigerian Banking industry found a
positive relationship between educational
background diversity and employee performance.
[19] researched on workforce diversity management
and employee performance in Pharmacy and
Poisons Board Kenya. The proxies for diversity
considered were gender, educational level and
ethnicity and the findings of this research revealed
that gender, ethnicity, and level of education all
have positive significant effect on employee
performance in regulatory institutions.
On the contrary, some studies concluded that
diversity variables (gender, ethnicity, and
educational diversity) do not affect employee
performance such as [24] in his research on the
county government of [6], [9], [21] also researched
on the impact of workforce diversity and employee
performance at the National Biosafety Authority,
Kenya using age, marital status, educational
background and gender as proxies for diversity and
efficiency, quality of work and output per employee
were the proxies for employee performance. The
study revealed that age, education and gender
impacts on employee performance while marital
status did not have much impact on employee
performance.
All the previous research reviewed within the
Nigerian banking sector, none focused on the
Domestic Systemically Important Banks (DSIBs)
which according to Central Bank of Nigeria Annual
report controls 63.8% of the industry total asset and
65.23% of the industry total deposit. These banks
control a major share of the banking sector in
Nigeria hence the interest to examine the impact of
workforce diversity on their employee performance
knowing that any finding on this research will be
applicable to others within the industry. This gap,
thus, necessitated the present study. This study was
guided by the following hypotheses:
H01: Age-diversity has no significant effect on
employee engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
H02: Experience -diversity has no significant effect
on employee engagement in the DSIBs in
Nigeria.
H03: Gender-diversity has no significant effect on
employee engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
H04: Age-diversity has no significant effect on
employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
H05: Experience-diversity has no significant effect
on employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in
Nigeria.
H06: Gender-diversity has no significant effect on
employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
911
Volume 18, 2022
Fig. 2: Conceptual Framework
3 Problem Solution
3.1 Data Collection and Sample
Representation
Data for this study was collected from different
categories of employees of the five (5) DSIBs in
Nigeria through a well-structured questionnaire on a
five-point Likert scale. A total of 2086
questionnaires were administered to the respondents
of the 5 DSIBs in the senior, middle and junior
cadres. A total of 1881 valid questionnaires were
returned for final analysis which accounted for
90.2% response rate. The data collected was
processed and analyzed using Structural Equation
Modelling (SEM) Maximum Likelihood.
4 Analysis and Results
Partial Least Square (PLS)- Structural Equation
Modeling software was used to test the proposed
model. PLS is considered more suitable that other
method of analysis especially when the conceptual
model is considered complex and includes many
constructs with formative indicators.
4.1 Hypothesis Testing
Table 4. Correlation Table
Correlations
AGD
GED
EMS
EME
AGD
r
1
EXD
r
.465**
GED
r
.382**
1
EMS
r
.320**
.414**
1
EME
r
.300**
.524**
.611**
1
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Fig. 3: Model Structural Design
As seen in Table 4, Age diversity has a weak
relationship with Experience diversity (0.465),
Gender diversity (0.382), Employee Satisfaction
(0.320) and Employee engagement (0.300).
Experience Diversity has a weak relationship with
Gender diversity (0.470), Employee Satisfaction
(0.413) and Employee engagement (0.423). In the
same vein, Gender diversity has a weak relationship
with Employee satisfaction (0.414) but a strong
relationship with Employee engagement (0.524).
Employee Satisfaction has a Strong relationship
with Employee engagement.
Fig. 4: Model Parameter Estimate
H01: Age-diversity has no significant effect on
employee engagement in the DSIBs in
Nigeria.
The variable age-diversity has a regression
coefficient 0.0490885. This implies that the age-
diversity has a positive impact on the employee
EME.93
ε1.35
AGD.46
4
EXD .38
4.2
GED.58
4.1
EMS.77
ε2.46
.049
.25
.38
.13
.31
.27
LR test of model vs. saturated: chi2(1) = 476.98, Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
var(e.EMS) .4641585 .0151352 .4354222 .4947913
var(e.EME) .3509001 .0114421 .3291757 .3740583
_cons .7742621 .1225662 6.32 0.000 .5340367 1.014487
GED .2663113 .0238731 11.16 0.000 .2195208 .3131018
EXD .3057789 .030977 9.87 0.000 .245065 .3664928
AGD .1263818 .0267936 4.72 0.000 .0738673 .1788962
EMS
_cons .9270839 .1065686 8.70 0.000 .7182132 1.135955
GED .3823454 .0207572 18.42 0.000 .3416621 .4230286
EXD .2456696 .0269339 9.12 0.000 .1928802 .298459
AGD .0490885 .0232964 2.11 0.035 .0034283 .0947487
EME
Structural
Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
OIM
Log likelihood = -8969.1103
Estimation method = ml
Structural equation model Number of obs = 1,881
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
912
Volume 18, 2022
engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria. Thus,
suggesting that an increase/change in age-diversity
of the DSIBs, could result to about 0.0490885 unit
increase in the level of employee engagement as a
measure of the employee performance as perceived
by the employees. Furthermore, the age-diversity
has a p-value of 0.035 which is less than 0.05 (5%)
level of significance thus implies that the coefficient
is statistically significant. Hence, the null hypothesis
“Age-diversity has no significant effect on
employee engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria” is
REJECTED. We therefore conclude that age-
diversity has a positive significant relationship with
employee engagement which is a measure of
employee performance in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
This is in line with the findings of the research by
Ekwochi et al., (2018) who concluded that age has a
positive and significant effect on the performance of
organization. Other research works that align with
this conclusion that age is positively correlated and
significantly related to employee engagement
include Gowrishankar et al., (2017); Odita and
Egbule (2015); Ehimare and Ogaga-Oghene (2011).
H02: Experience-diversity has no significant
effect on employee engagement in the DSIBs in
Nigeria.
The variable experience-diversity has a regression
coefficient 0.2456696. This implies that the
experience-diversity has a positive impact on the
employee engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
Thus, suggesting that an increase/change in
experience-diversity of the DSIBs, could result to
about 0.2456696 unit increase in the level of
employee engagement as a measure of the employee
performance as perceived by the employees.
Furthermore, experience-diversity has a p-value of
0.000 which is less than 0.05 (5%) level of
significance thus implies that the coefficient is
statistically significant. Hence, the null hypothesis
“Experience-diversity has no significant effect on
employee engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria” is
REJECTED. We therefore conclude that
experience-diversity has a positive significant effect
on employee engagement which is a measure of
employee performance in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
The findings of this research question are in
consonance with the works of Osibanjo et al.,
(2020) and Ogbo et al., (2014) who found that work
experience has a positive significant relationship
with employee engagement.
H03: Gender-diversity has no significant effect on
employee engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
The variable gender-diversity has a regression
coefficient 0.3823454. This implies that the gender-
diversity has a positive impact on the employee
engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria. Thus,
suggesting that an increase/change in gender-
diversity of the DSIBs, could result to about
0.3823454 unit increase in the level of employee
engagement as a measure of the employee
performance as perceived by the employees.
Furthermore, the gender-diversity has a p-value of
0.000 which is less than 0.05 (5%) level of
significance thus implies that the coefficient is
statistically significant. Hence, the null hypothesis
“Gender-diversity has no significant effect on
employee engagement in the DSIBs in Nigeria” is
REJECTED. We therefore conclude that gender
diversity has a positive significant effect on
employee engagement which is a measure of
employee performance in the DSIBs in Nigeria. [4],
[6], [11] in their research work described gender as
having a positively significant effect on employee
engagement.
H04: Age-diversity has no significant effect on
employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
The variable age-diversity has a regression
coefficient 0.1263818. This implies that the age-
diversity has a positive impact on the employee
satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria. Thus,
suggesting that an increase/change in age-diversity
of the DSIBs, could result to about 0.1263818 unit
increase in the level of employee satisfaction as a
measure of the employee performance as perceived
by the employees.
Furthermore, age-diversity has a p-value of 0.000
which is less than 0.05 (5%) level of significance
thus implies that the coefficient is statistically
significant. Hence, the null hypothesis “Age-
diversity has no significant effect on employee
satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria” is
REJECTED. We therefore conclude that age-
diversity has a positive significant effect on
employee satisfaction which is a measure of
employee performance in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
Several researchers have found similar correlation
between age diversity and employee satisfaction
some of which are [8], [30].
Ho5: Experience-diversity has no significant
effect on employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in
Nigeria.
The variable experience-diversity has a regression
coefficient 0.3057789. This implies that the
experience-diversity has a positive impact on the
employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
913
Volume 18, 2022
Thus, suggesting that an increase/change in
experience-diversity of the DSIBs, could result to
about 0.3057789 unit increase in the level of
employee satisfaction as a measure of the employee
performance as perceived by the employees.
Furthermore, the age-diversity has a p-value of
0.000 which is less than 0.05 (5%) level of
significance thus implies that the coefficient is
statistically significant. Hence, the null hypothesis
“Experience-diversity has no significant effect on
employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria” is
REJECTED. We therefore conclude that
experience diversity has a positive significant effect
on employee satisfaction which is a measure of
employee performance in the DSIBs in Nigeria. The
findings agree with the research work of [5], [10],
[11], [14], [31], [31].
H06: Gender-diversity has no significant effect on
employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
The variable gender-diversity has a regression
coefficient 0.2663113. This implies that the gender-
diversity has a positive impact on the employee
satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria. Thus,
suggesting that, with an increase/change in gender-
diversity of the DSIBs, could result to about
0.2663113 unit increase in the level of employee
satisfaction as a measure of the employee
performance as perceived by the employees.
Furthermore, the gender-diversity has a p-value of
0.000 which is less than 0.05 (5%) level of
significance thus implies that the coefficient is
statistically significant. Hence, the null hypothesis
“Gender-diversity has no significant effect on
employee satisfaction in the DSIBs in Nigeria” is
REJECTED. We therefore conclude that gender-
diversity has a positive significant effect on
employee satisfaction which is a measure of
employee performance in the DSIBs in Nigeria.
This agrees with research work of [1][3], [9], [27].
5 Conclusion
From the findings of this study, it can be reasonably
concluded that the workforce diversity proxies
examined (age, gender, and experience) have
significant positive impact on employee
performance (employee engagement and employee
satisfaction) in DSIBs in Nigeria.
Banks operating in competitive markets seek to
continually enhance their performance [4], [6]. The
factors that support the enhancement of such
performance occupies the strategic management
literature. Scholars have recognized the important
role that the management of diversity plays towards
driving employee performance in the organization.
However, this relationship is not yet well
understood, and studies have sought to examine
various contingencies that might mediate or
moderate this relationship.
This study investigated the impact of workforce
diversity variables particularly age, gender and
experience on employee performance relationship.
The study proposed a structural model that was
tested using primary data collected from a survey
instrument administered to five (5) DSIBs in
Nigeria. Regression analysis and PLS-SEM was
used to test the model hypotheses. A recent
procedure based on a modeling subsample and
holdout sub-sample was also used in this study to
assess the predictive validity of the PLS-SEM
model under investigation, and finally the causal
asymmetry analysis was performed.
From a practical viewpoint, the study suggests that
organization managers should be aware of the role
diversity management plays on employee
performance. It suggests that organization that
manages age, gender and experience diversity
ultimately promotes employee engagement and
satisfaction.
The study of employee engagement is a vibrant
topic in the current economic scenario because
engaged and satisfied employees contribute to high
performing organizations [8], [12], [17], [22]. The
study revealed that employee engagement is a good
indicator for success of any organization.
Organizations ought to concentrate on employee
engagement to boost their growth and create
competitive advantage. An engaged workplace
encourages commitment and energy among
employees of the organization to enhance
production and business performance. In
conclusion, we can say that high levels of
engagement and satisfaction in the banking sector
improves employee performance and ultimately
organizational performance. It is concerned about
maximum utilization of organization’s assets to
achieve competitive advantage in the marketplace.
The study summarizes that there is a great degree of
association between workplace diversity, employee
satisfaction and employee engagement.
5.1 Implications for Managers
Workforce diversity is a growing phenomenon in
the world today. This research has contributed to the
body of knowledge on the impact of workforce
diversity on employee performance in DSIBs in
Nigeria. It is necessary to note that some Banks in
Nigeria recognize and accept the need to have a
diverse workforce and have also crafted its diversity
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
914
Volume 18, 2022
policies towards ensuring improved performance.
However, not all organizations are aware of the
relevance of diversity in the workplace. It is
important for every organization to embrace
diversity, ensure that they harness every benefit that
comes from diversity and put machineries in place
to reduce the negative consequences that may arise
from group social categorization.
The findings of this study have provided evidence
that employee performance has a positive
correlation with workforce diversity variables such
as age, gender and experience. Therefore, it is
important for organizations to be conscious of the
need to deal with demographic characteristics of its
employees to gain competitive advantage.
Management should ensure that employees are
properly educated on the present or existing
initiatives and programs of diversity available and
its importance to the growth of the organization.
From literatures reviewed, it was discovered that
some organizations still have the glass ceiling that
prevents women from advancing into senior
positions in the organizations. From the result of
this study, it is evident that employees feel
motivated when they work with colleagues of
different gender as they perceive the opposite
gender as being capable of performing their job
effectively. As such, organizational leaders should
take off glass ceilings factor and review the pay
structure in the organization to promote equality in
pay as this will encourage improved employee
performance. Managements of the DSIBs should
uphold and continue to promote diversity policies
and practices in their operations given the
importance and benefits that diversity provides to
the organization. Promoting diversity within the
organization should be encouraged and rewarded.
On Gender Diversity: Management should continue
to promote equal employment and opportunity for
career growth for all gender. To encourage gender
diversity, managers should create flexible working
policies that can help female employees to manage
their work and their personal life (work-life balance)
without clashes. Management should create a metric
to check gender balancing in number, salary and
ranks in the organization.
On Age Diversity: Management should encourage
that teams should be made up of different age
groups. Younger employees are more skilled when
it comes to handling high business technologies e.g.,
webcasting, social networking. These skills if
shared, can boost performance of both the
employees and the organization. Older employees
are known to have more interpersonal and
traditional business skills. If these skills are
harnessed, the organization will be able to build
stronger communication and customer relationship
to increase customer loyalty. This shared knowledge
can enhance the performance of both group of
employees.
Also, Management should start embracing
knowledge skills and experience of employees to
enjoy the benefits of age diversity seeing that each
generation possess different skills and talent that
they come with into the organization. It will help the
organization stay relevant in the marketplace if
Management continues to promote age diversity.
Also offering internship opportunities are some of
the ways to bring in younger employees and
increase the benefits of age diversity. Managers or
recruiters of the bank should do away with personal
bias during recruitment. Management should offer
diversity training to all employees that will also deal
with implicit bias within employees. This training
with create awareness about the unconscious
behavior or attitude they showcase in the workplace
and will provide effective tools to help employees
change such behavior.
On Experience Diversity: from the findings, there is
a significant and positive correlation between
experience diversity and employee performance
(satisfaction and engagement). Experience diversity
comes with its benefits that can enhance employee
and organizational performance. Hence
management should encourage social interactions
between employees. With this, employees can
benefit from the experience of their fellow
colleagues. The experience carried on board by
other members of staff in the Banks can be of great
help to successfully deliver on a specific task that
requires such knowledge when the need arises.
Experience diversity can help the banks in quality
service delivery especially in operations where
colleagues have to work with customers with
different backgrounds and expectations, having a
diverse workforce with varying experience can help
improve performance.
Hence management should improve this awareness
amongst its employees. The work environment
should be made more welcoming for the employees
with various experience garnered from their former
places of work and of life as this will help minimize
misunderstandings and enhance performance. From
a practical viewpoint, the study suggests that
organization managers should be aware of the role
diversity management plays on employee
performance. It suggests that organization that
manage age, gender and experience diversity
ultimately promotes employee engagement and
satisfaction. The study of employee engagement is a
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
915
Volume 18, 2022
trending topic in the current economic scenario
because satisfied and engaged employees give rise
to high performing organizations [7], [8], [25].
This research reveals that employee engagement is a
good indicator for success of any organization.
Organizations need to pay attention to employee
engagement to boost their growth and create
competitive advantage. An engaged workplace
fosters commitment and energy among employees
of the organization to enhance production and
business performance. In concluding, we can say
that high levels of engagement and satisfaction in
the banking sector improves employee performance
and ultimately organizational performance. The
study summarizes that there is a great degree of
association between workforce diversity, employee
satisfaction and employee engagement.
Based on the findings of this research work, rather
than focus on just diversity management,
organizations should create an enabling
organizational culture that allows for harnessing the
benefits of age, gender, and experience diversity. It
must be noted that there are significant gains to be
made internally through strengthening internal
capabilities and taking advantage of them through
an innovative approach in the management of
human and material resources in the organization.
Acknowledgements:
We wish to acknowledge the Nile University of
Nigeria, Abuja for providing an enabling
environment for this study.
References:
[1] Y. Li et al., “Leveraging age diversity for
organizational performance: An intellectual
capital perspective.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol.
106, no. 1, p. 71, 2021.
[2] W. Li, X. Wang, M. J. Haque, M. N.
Shafique, and M. Z. Nawaz, Impact of
workforce diversity management on
employees’ outcomes: Testing the mediating
role of a person’s job match,” SAGE Open,
vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2158244020903402, 2020.
[3] T. Köllen and S. Kopf, “Ostracism and
nationalism in the workplace: discursive
exclusionary practices between cultural and
geographic neighbors,” Rev. Manag. Sci.,
vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 583615, 2022.
[4] S. Duchek, S. Raetze, and I. Scheuch, “The
role of diversity in organizational resilience:
a theoretical framework,” Bus. Res., vol. 13,
no. 2, pp. 387423, 2020.
[5] N. Gupta and V. Sharma, “Exploring
employee engagementA way to better
business performance,” Glob. Bus. Rev., vol.
17, no. 3_suppl, pp. 45S-63S, 2016.
[6] J. E. Delery and D. Roumpi, “Strategic
human resource management, human capital
and competitive advantage: is the field going
in circles?,” Hum. Resour. Manag. J., vol.
27, no. 1, pp. 121, 2017.
[7] W. E. Dahanayake, “Impact of Workforce
Diversity on Employee Performance in Sri
Lankan Construction Industry,” 2020.
[8] C.-W. Dai, W.-F. Ding, Y.-J. Zhu, J.-H. Xu,
and H.-W. Yu, “Grinding temperature and
power consumption in high speed grinding
of Inconel 718 nickel-based superalloy with
a vitrified CBN wheel,” Precis. Eng., vol.
52, pp. 192200, 2018.
[9] S. Kim and S. Park, “Diversity management
and fairness in public organizations,” Public
Organ. Rev., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 179193,
2017.
[10] M. S. Usmani, J. Wang, N. Ahmad, Z. Ullah,
M. Iqbal, and M. Ismail, “Establishing a
corporate social responsibility
implementation model for promoting
sustainability in the food sector: a hybrid
approach of expert mining and ISM
MICMAC,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol.
29, no. 6, pp. 88518872, 2022.
[11] A. Hsiao, C. Auld, and E. Ma, “Perceived
organizational diversity and employee
behavior,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 48, pp.
102112, 2015.
[12] S. Tamhankar, “USING INTERNET
REVIEW SITES TO CREATE
RESTAURANT BRANDS,” 2017.
[13] A. M. Alghazo and H. M. Al Shaiban, “The
effects of workforce diversity on employee
performance at an oil and gas company,”
Am. J. Bus. Soc., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 148153,
2016.
[14] A. E. Omankhanlen and J. Ogaga-Oghene,
“The impact of workforce diversity on
organizational effectiveness: a study of a
Nigerian bank,” Ann. Univ. Petroşani, Econ.,
vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 93110, 2011.
[15] M. del C. Triana, T. L. Miller, and T. M.
Trzebiatowski, “The double-edged nature of
board gender diversity: Diversity, firm
performance, and the power of women
directors as predictors of strategic change,”
Organ. Sci., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 609632,
2014.
[16] K. W. Phillips, D. Medin, C. D. Lee, M.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
916
Volume 18, 2022
Bang, S. Bishop, and D. N. Lee, “How
diversity works,” Sci. Am., vol. 311, no. 4,
pp. 4247, 2014.
[17] E. Pillay and S. Singh, “The Impact of
employee engagement on organisational
performancea case of an Insurance
Brokerage company in Gauteng,” J. Bus.
Manag., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 6676, 2018.
[18] S. Rehman, R. Mohamed, and H. Ayoup,
“The mediating role of organizational
capabilities between organizational
performance and its determinants,” J. Glob.
Entrep. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 123, 2019.
[19] F. O. Ogunsanwo, A. I. Adelugba, and A. S.
Obarfo, “Effects of Workforce Diversity on
Employee Performance of Universities in
Ekiti State, Nigeria,” FUDMA J. Manag.
Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 350361, 2021.
[20] J. K. Obamiro, B. O. Kumolu-Johnson, and
J. C. Ngwamaj, “Workforce Diversity and
Employees’ Performance: Evidence from a
Nigerian Bank,” Int. J. Econ. Behav., vol. 9,
no. 1, pp. 1326, 2019.
[21] M. D. MUTHONI, “Workforce Diversity
Management and Employee Performance in
National Biosafety Authority, Kenya.”
Master’s Thesis, Kenyatta University, 2017.
[22] S. Tasheva and A. J. Hillman, “Integrating
diversity at different levels: Multilevel
human capital, social capital, and
demographic diversity and their implications
for team effectiveness,” Acad. Manag. Rev.,
vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 746765, 2019.
[23] U. Makhdoomi, F. N.-A. G. B. Review, and
undefined 2017, “Workforce diversity and
employee performance: An empirical study
of telecom organizations,” researchgate.net,
Accessed: May 06, 2022. [Online].
Available:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria-
Pressentin/publication/350940549_Rethinkin
g_Human_Resources_for_Social_Innovation
_in_Business_Trends_-_Leadership_-
_Action_Plan/links/607a67f22fb9097c0cecb
58b/Rethinking-Human-Resources-for-
Social-Innovation-in-Business-Trends-
Leadership-Action-Plan.pdf#page=108
[24] N. M. I. Al-Habib, “Leadership and
organizational performance: Is it essential in
healthcare systems improvement? A review
of literature,” Saudi J. Anaesth., vol. 14, no.
1, p. 69, 2020.
[25] J. B. Barney, “Is the resource-based view’ a
useful perspective for strategic management
research? Yes,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 26,
no. 1, pp. 4156, 2001.
[26] C. S. O. Nnadi and U. A. Chinedu, “Effect of
Diversity Management Strategies on
Employee Retention among Staff of Nigeria
Deposit Insurance Corporation,” Int. J. Acad.
Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 999
1019, 2019.
[27] W. M. Lim, “An equity theory perspective of
online group buying,” J. Retail. Consum.
Serv., vol. 54, p. 101729, 2020.
[28] P. Shrestha and D. Parajuli, “Impact of
Workforce Diversity on Employee
Performance,” Int. J. Manag., vol. 12, no. 2,
pp. 8695, 2021.
[29] A. S. Mwatumwa, “Effect of workforce
diversity on employee work performance: a
study of the county government of
Mombasa,” 2016.
[30] S. Z. Zamani, “Small and Medium
Enterprises (SMEs) facing an evolving
technological era: a systematic literature
review on the adoption of technologies in
SMEs,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., no. ahead-of-
print, 2022.
[31] A. K. Gupta, D. D. Bhatta, and S. P. Bhatt,
“Does Workforce Diversity Influence
Employee Performance? An Empirical
Analysis of Nepali Civil Service”.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
1. Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo Supervision of
Ph.D. work, Conceptualization,
Methodology, Discussion, and
proofreading.
2. Hauwa Lamido - Abubakar - Writing of
Original Draft, Literature Review & Data
Analysis.
3. Daniel Ogohi Cross was responsible for
the Statistics.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT
DOI: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.86
Joan Ekhomeh Ehilebo,
Hauwa Lamido-Abubakar, Daniel Ogohi Cross
E-ISSN: 2224-3496
917
Volume 18, 2022