Improvement of Productivity by Using Means of Lean Manufacturing,
Just in Time, and Production Technology in Thai SMEs Manufacturing
Industry
PIYACHAT BURAWAT
Faculty of Business Administration
Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Pathumthani,
THAILAND
Abstract: - This study investigated the current situations, opportunities, and obstacles in manufacturing industry,
and to create a model for improving the efficiency while reducing the levels of inventory. This study gathered
information from in-depth interview using snowball sampling from 20 manufacturing companies in Thailand.
The results revealed that the organization has implemented lean production principles as a strategic initiative to
mitigate losses. The implementation of comprehensive work manuals, offered in diverse languages such as Thai,
Burmese, Japanese, and English, serves as an additional mechanism to mitigate losses by ensuring clarity and
understanding among the workforce. Furthermore, the integration of modern technologies, encompassing
machine technology, robotics and artificial intelligence, is actively pursued to streamline production processes
and consequently reduce losses. The results presented that companies refrain from adopting Just-In-Time
production systems due to operational challenges associated with fulfilling customer orders. Specifically,
frequent machine shutdowns for adjustments are necessitated, leading to elevated unit costs. Manufacturing
companies in Thailand continue to harbor potential for growth, despite the inevitable rise in employee wages
leading to increased operational costs. To navigate this challenging landscape, companies must remain adaptive,
responding not only to shifts in customer preferences but also to advancements in technology, proactive
examination of customer needs prior to initiating the production process, a paradigm shift from low-cost
production to the premium-grade products addresses the demands of customers seeking superior product quality,
and the process of broadening customer bases both overseas and globally, and the analysis of distinct customer
groups in identifying new target demographics.
Key-Words: - Productivity, Lean Manufacturing, Just in Time, Modern Production Technology, Manufacturing
Industry
Received: February 21, 2024. Revised: August 19, 2024. Accepted: September 13, 2024. Published: October 15, 2024.
1 Introduction
In the current era of globalization, streamlined
communication and business operations have
intensified competition, necessitating manufacturing
and service companies to devise strategies for
gaining competitive advantage. Intense competition
pervades across all sectors, with manufacturing
companies particularly focused on delivering high-
quality products, competitive pricing, prompt
delivery, and adherence to customer specifications.
Moreover, the success of businesses is contingent
upon various global economic factors such as product
demand, trade policies, market liberalization, and the
proliferation of free trade zones worldwide. These
factors compel organizations to undergo
transformation in order to adapt to evolving
organizational landscapes. Recently, there has been a
burgeoning emphasis on knowledge-based
approaches to confront changing customer demands,
necessitating robust management methodologies.
Over successive periods, modern management
theories and principles have continuously evolved,
with a particular emphasis on novel concepts aimed
at enhancing quality and productivity. Furthermore,
there is a growing recognition of the significance of
technology and information systems in augmenting
productivity and quality, prompting increased
attention towards their integration into organizational
processes.
Labor productivity stands as a pivotal determinant
of competitiveness within industries. Not only does it
foster enhanced sustainable revenue streams, but it
also serves as a critical factor in sustaining
competitiveness. Enterprises burdened with elevated
operational costs face diminished competitiveness,
inevitably leading to financial losses and potential
business withdrawal. Thailand's labor productivity
growth has been modest, averaging a 2% annual
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2024.4.11
Piyachat Burawat
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
102
Volume 4, 2024
increase, notably lower compared to countries such
as Vietnam and China, where productivity has surged
by 4% and 10% respectively [1]. Concurrently,
Thailand has witnessed a 3% rise in unit labor costs,
while Indonesia has experienced a notable 12%
reduction in the same metric [1]. This combination of
subdued productivity growth and escalating unit
labor costs inevitably diminishes Thailand's overall
competitiveness in the global market landscape.
While approximately 70% of manufacturing firms
prioritize lean manufacturing, only 26% achieve
significant success [2]. Many companies attribute
unsatisfactory outcomes to inadequate focus on the
supply chain and insufficient encouragement for lean
practices implementation. Moreover, some firms,
despite winning prestigious awards such as the
Shingo Prize, fail to sustain lean programs, resulting
in the inability to maintain sustainable results [2].
Successful lean program implementation correlates
with several factors, including management
attention, goal clarity, active involvement and
commitment from all members, empowerment of
employees, clear performance metrics, and a well-
defined plan for process improvement [3].
The primary advantages commonly attributed to
lean manufacturing encompass enhancements in
labor productivity, product quality, and reductions in
lead time to customers, cycle time, and production
costs [4]. However, divergent findings emerge from
studies exploring the relationship between lean
manufacturing and organizational performance.
While some research suggests a positive association
between certain aspects of lean manufacturing and
organizational performance, others indicate a lack of
correlation [5][6]. Furthermore, certain studies
indicate that lean manufacturing influences financial
performance through its impact on operational
performance [7][8].
Inventory stands as a significant asset for
numerous companies, often constituting up to 50% of
total invested capital. Given its substantial financial
implications, effective inventory management is
widely acknowledged as pivotal by managers. While
reducing inventory can lead to cost savings, the
downside entails potential production halts and
customer dissatisfaction in instances of stockouts [9].
Companies that have embraced integrated
technologies demonstrate notably elevated levels of
effort in strategic planning and team-based project
management, consequently attaining superior
performance across diverse performance metrics
compared to their counterparts. Moreover, firms
emphasizing the development of human factors
appear to reap greater benefits from advanced
manufacturing technology implementation [10].
This study endeavors to investigate productivity
enhancement within the Thai SME manufacturing
industry through the implementation of lean
manufacturing, just-in-time practices, and modern
production technology. The aim is to provide
guidelines for productivity improvement and waste
reduction, ultimately enabling enterprises to achieve
heightened competitiveness within the
manufacturing sector
2 Literature Review
This section elucidates the significance of the
research model by elucidating its alignment with
established theoretical frameworks pertaining to
productivity, just-in-time practices, production
technology, and the manufacturing industry.
2.1 Productivity
Productivity is commonly defined as the ratio of
outputs or products generated by a manufacturing or
service process to the inputs or resources utilized to
attain these outputs [11]. Accordingly, productivity
entails the efficient utilization of inputs such as labor,
machinery, materials, finances, land, information,
energy, and management in the production of diverse
outputs, encompassing both services and products
[12]. Moreover, heightened productivity levels
denote achieving greater output quantities or superior
product quality with the same input resources [13].
Additionally, productivity can be perceived as the
effectiveness and efficiency in job performance [12].
In response to the pervasive and relentless
competition spurred by globalization, scholars have
argued that the conventional definition of
productivity, solely focusing on the quantitative
relationship between outputs and resources, is
inadequate for assessing organizational effectiveness
in contemporary contexts [14][15]. Recent
perspectives on productivity advocate for a broader
framework that incorporates considerations such as
social and ecological costs, adaptability to evolving
customer demands, value creation for all
stakeholders in the supply chain, resilience in fiercely
competitive environments, and agility in responding
to customer needs [15][16].
2.2 Just in Time
Just-In-Time (JIT) production is a manufacturing
strategy centered on minimizing material inventory
by introducing necessary raw materials or
components into the production process precisely
when needed and in the required quantity. This
method avoids warehousing finished products.
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2024.4.11
Piyachat Burawat
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
103
Volume 4, 2024
Successful JIT implementation requires
synchronizing the production system to ensure
balanced operations across each stage, evenly
distributing working hours. Timely introduction of
raw materials is crucial, requiring collaboration with
suppliers [17].
The effective operation of JIT production hinges
upon establishing strong relationships among raw
material suppliers, production lines, and marketing
units. A cohesive network ensures timely raw
material delivery, enhancing overall production chain
efficiency. Any component or process failure has
significant ramifications, impeding prompt product
production and highlighting the interdependence
among involved entities. Thus, the absence of timely
input disrupts the delicate balance of the JIT system,
hindering production workflow and compromising
the objective of timely product delivery [9].
2.3 Production Technology
Technology plays a critical role in modern
production methods, driving efficiency, cost
reduction, and product quality enhancement. In
today's business landscape, technology is
indispensable, exerting a significant influence on
production methodologies. It has transformed
business operations, fostering the emergence of more
streamlined and economical production processes.
Automation stands out as a prominent manifestation
of technological advancement in production.
Leveraging robotics and artificial intelligence,
automation has supplanted manual labor across
various industries, resulting in heightened
productivity and diminished labor expenses. For
example, within the automotive sector, robots
deployed in assembly lines execute repetitive tasks
with precision and swiftness, amplifying output and
minimizing errors.
Furthermore, technology has facilitated the
implementation of advanced production techniques
such as Just-In-Time (JIT) and lean manufacturing.
These methodologies heavily rely on sophisticated
software systems for inventory management,
scheduling, and quality control. For instance, JIT,
which aims to minimize waste by producing goods
only when needed, necessitates accurate forecasting
and real-time tracking of inventory levels, made
feasible by technology. Moreover, technology plays
a crucial role in enhancing product quality.
Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Computer-
Aided Manufacturing (CAM) enable precise design
and production, reducing the likelihood of defects
and ensuring consistency in product quality.
Additionally, technology enables stringent quality
control through automated inspection systems
capable of detecting flaws that may elude human
inspectors. Furthermore, technology has enabled the
adoption of flexible manufacturing systems,
permitting the production of a variety of products on
the same production line. This flexibility is
particularly advantageous in industries where
product differentiation is pivotal for competitive
advantage. For instance, in the electronics sector,
companies can swiftly transition from producing one
type of device to another, responding promptly to
shifts in market demand [18].
Advanced digital production technologies
encompass a wide array of innovations, including
new materials, the Internet of Things (IoT), big data
analysis, advanced robotics, cloud computing,
additive manufacturing, artificial intelligence (AI)
supported manufacturing, nano and biotechnological
production. These emerging technologies are poised
to impact numerous sectors in the future, albeit not
instantaneously. The integration of these
technologies into industries is expected to occur
gradually and organically. Once production facilities
incorporate technology into their workflows, smart
production platforms will emerge, characterized by
data sharing, deep learning networks, AI, IoT, and
remote-controlled machine and hardware integration.
Consequently, traditional production areas and
machines are anticipated to occupy a smaller
percentage of factories [18].
2.4 Manufacturing Industry
The manufacturing industry encompasses sectors
involved in the production and processing of goods,
contributing to either the creation of new
commodities or value addition. This sector holds a
substantial share of the industrial sector in developed
countries, with final products serving as finished
goods for sale to customers or intermediate goods for
use in further production processes.
In 2021, Thailand's GDP structure delineated the
service sector as the predominant economic activity,
comprising 60% of the GDP, followed by the
manufacturing and agriculture sectors, constituting
32% and 8%, respectively [19]. The GDP of the SME
sector in 2022, categorized by SME sizes, amounted
to 6,105,604 million baht, representing 34.5% of total
GDP [20]. Further analysis of the GDP structure for
small and medium-sized businesses revealed the
service sector as the most significant activity,
accounting for 43.6%, followed by the manufacturing
sector at 35.4%. The retail and wholesale sector and
the agricultural business sector represented
proportions of 20.5% and 0.5%, respectively [20].
The study revealed that Thailand is ranked 35th in
terms of industrial potential, with seven Thai
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2024.4.11
Piyachat Burawat
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
104
Volume 4, 2024
industries positioned among the top 15 globally.
These include the coking coal and oil refining
products industry (9th), the rubber and plastic
industry (9th), the food and beverage production
industry (11th), the health industry (11th), the
recreation industry (13th), the retail and wholesale
industry (14th), and the textile industry (15th).
Conversely, Thai industries positioned in the bottom
three globally encompass the construction industry
(64th), the education industry (60th), and the IT
industry (61st) [21].
Interestingly, other ASEAN countries also exhibit
industries with significant potential, with Vietnam
excelling in the clothing and textile industry,
Singapore leading in financial and computer-related
affairs, and Indonesia ranking fifth in food and drink
proficiency. This data suggests that neighboring
countries may experience rapid development, posing
increased competition for Thailand in the coming
years [21]. Given the aforementioned context, the
sample population for this study comprised
executives and managers employed within the
manufacturing industry in Thailand.
In conclusion, lean manufacturing, just-in-time
practices, and advanced digital production
technologies play a pivotal role in modern production
methods. These methodologies enhance efficiency,
reduce costs, and improve product quality, thereby
enabling businesses to maintain competitiveness in
the dynamic global market landscape.
3 Research Methodology
The study employed a qualitative approach, utilizing
in-depth interviews conducted through snowball
sampling with 20 participants comprising managing
directors, executives, production managers, and sales
managers from 20 companies. Data collection took
place from March 2023 to March 2024, and analysis
was conducted using content analysis techniques.
4 Research Results
The study comprised primarily companies from the
automotive industry (20), followed by the food and
beverage industry (5), construction industry (3),
electric and electronic industry (3), garment and
textile industry (2), plastic industry (1), energy
industry (1), rubber industry (1), cosmetic industry
(1), machinery industry (1), and thermoplastic paint
industry (1).
4.1 Lean Manufacturing Practices
Participants reported that their organizations have
adopted lean production principles strategically to
mitigate losses, focusing on minimizing losses
attributed to employee errors and machine
inefficiencies during production. Various
methodologies have been deployed to address
employee-related losses, including rigorous quality
assessments of raw materials, thorough scrutiny of
work processes, and meticulous inspection of
machinery and equipment. Additionally, measures
such as employee training programs are emphasized
to enhance skills and bolster pre-production
preparedness, further contributing to loss prevention
efforts.
The provision of comprehensive work manuals,
available in multiple languages including Thai,
Burmese, Japanese, and English, is employed as a
supplementary measure to mitigate losses by
promoting clarity and comprehension among the
workforce. Additionally, the incorporation of modern
technologies such as robotics and artificial
intelligence (AI) is actively pursued to optimize
production processes and minimize losses. This
multifaceted approach highlights the organization's
dedication to adopting contemporary tools and
methodologies to enhance resilience against losses
incurred during the production phase.
Addressing losses stemming from machine failures
necessitates a multifaceted approach, including
robust employee training initiatives. These programs
aim to equip personnel with essential skills for
proficient machinery operation and basic
maintenance tasks. Encouraging employee
engagement in ongoing machine monitoring,
alongside a streamlined reporting system for
identified issues, facilitates swift problem resolution.
Moreover, promoting a culture of employee
engagement in ongoing machine monitoring, coupled
with a responsive reporting mechanism for identified
issues, facilitates prompt problem resolution.
The proactive involvement described above
demonstrates its effectiveness in swiftly resolving
machine problems, resulting in a reduction of
associated losses. Central to this strategy is
addressing the challenge of producing substandard
products, with artificial intelligence (AI) playing a
pivotal role. AI technologies are utilized to analyze
machine-generated data, enabling precise diagnostics
of problems. Subsequent repairs are aligned with
identified machine issues, thereby minimizing losses
related to the production of inferior-quality products.
Moreover, the incorporation of AI enables nuanced
analysis to formulate strategic plans for timely and
appropriate maintenance interventions. This forward-
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2024.4.11
Piyachat Burawat
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
105
Volume 4, 2024
looking approach optimizes maintenance schedules,
ensuring that corrective actions are implemented
judiciously, thereby reinforcing the organization's
resilience against losses resulting from machine
failures.
4.2 Just in Time Practices
Participants revealed that the organization has
implemented a Just-In-Time (JIT) production system
strategically to improve operational efficiency by
minimizing or eliminating inventory and ensuring
timely deliveries to customers. Orders from
customers are typically placed within a 10-15 day
window before the designated delivery date. Unlike
conventional practices, where production planning
begins post-receipt of customer orders, the company
adopts a proactive approach to streamline production
processes. Upon order receipt, the purchasing
department initiates raw material procurement,
coordinating deliveries from suppliers at a frequency
of 1-2 rounds per day. This scheduling minimizes
raw material storage space in the warehouse,
reducing associated costs and time spent locating
materials. The production department, informed by
customer orders, dispenses raw materials in required
quantities.
Concurrently, the shipping or distribution department
meticulously plans truck routes to optimize
efficiency, coordinating routes to prevent
unnecessary diversions and ensure coherent paths.
Such strategic route planning is crucial in avoiding
redundant detours and associated time wastage.
Moreover, goods are loaded during both outbound
and return truck journeys to prevent empty vehicle
returns to the company premises. This concerted
effort aligns with the JIT philosophy, contributing to
the organization's goal of waste reduction and
logistical efficiency enhancement across the supply
chain.
Concurrently with production processes, the shipping
or distribution department carefully strategizes truck
routes to maximize efficiency, ensuring coherent
paths and minimizing unnecessary diversions. This
strategic route planning is essential to avoid
redundant detours and time wastage. Additionally,
goods loading is coordinated during both outbound
and return truck journeys to avoid empty vehicle
returns to the company premises. This concerted
effort aligns with the Just-In-Time (JIT) philosophy,
supporting the organization's objective of waste
minimization and logistical efficiency improvement
across the supply chain.
Participants highlighted that some companies
hesitate to adopt Just-In-Time (JIT) production
systems due to operational hurdles in meeting
customer orders. Notably, frequent machine
shutdowns for adjustments incur higher unit costs.
Additionally, the procurement of raw materials from
suppliers presents challenges, as it mandates meeting
minimum purchase requirements stipulated by the
suppliers, thus necessitating the acquisition of larger
quantities of raw materials to comply with supplier
conditions.
To tackle these challenges, one alternative strategy
involves establishing a production contract between
the company and its customer. In this framework, the
customer forecasts production orders in advance,
enabling proactive planning by the company for raw
material procurement and production scheduling.
This approach allows the company to place bulk
orders for raw materials and conduct large-scale
production runs, ultimately reducing unit production
costs. However, it also leads to increased inventory
storage costs due to the higher volume of goods held
in storage.
In essence, the negotiated production contract serves
as a strategic compromise, enabling the company to
balance considerations of unit production costs with
inventory storage expenses. This tailored approach
aims to optimize operational efficiency and cost-
effectiveness, navigating the complex trade-offs
inherent in JIT production systems and their
implications for the overall economic viability of the
production process.
4.3 Production Technology Applications
Participants underscored contemporary challenges
encountered by production companies, especially
those heavily dependent on human labor, including
rising labor costs resulting in workforce reductions.
Despite increased labor mobility facilitated by
ASEAN integration, particularly through the
ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), escalating
wages and labor shortages persist as critical concerns
for manufacturing entities.
To tackle these challenges, companies primarily rely
on machine technology as their primary production
methodology. Automated machinery, controlled by
computer systems, is favored to mitigate errors
associated with human labor. Complementing this
automation, the integration of sensor systems assists
in both production processes and product quality
inspection. The incorporation of software is
instrumental in organizational resource management,
helping to mitigate operational errors. The real-time
and current data updates facilitated by these
technologies contribute to enhanced
interdepartmental coordination.
Moreover, the integration of Artificial Intelligence
(AI) into production processes and machinery
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2024.4.11
Piyachat Burawat
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
106
Volume 4, 2024
functions as an advanced analytical tool. AI plays a
crucial role in accurately identifying and analyzing
problems, providing timely and effective solutions.
This multifaceted technological integration not only
improves the precision of issue detection but also
streamlines the problem-solving process,
exemplifying a comprehensive approach to
addressing challenges in both production and
machinery domains.
5 Discussions and Conclusions
Manufacturing companies in Thailand retain growth
potential despite rising employee wages, which
elevate operational costs. To navigate this
challenging scenario, companies must remain
adaptive, responding to both customer preferences
and technological advancements [22]. A key aspect
of adaptability is proactively assessing customer
needs before commencing the production process.
Through comprehensive surveys, companies can
glean valuable insights into evolving customer
requirements.
Moreover, investing in research and development to
explore innovative product formats facilitates market
expansion, particularly in international arenas,
streamlining the process of broadening customer
bases both overseas and globally. Analyzing distinct
customer groups is imperative in identifying new
target demographics. Additionally, shifting focus
from traditional goals of low-cost production to
creating premium-grade products addresses the
demands of customers seeking superior product
quality.
In looking towards the future, the integration of
advanced production technologies such as robotics
and Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerges as a strategic
imperative [23]. These technologies offer a dual
advantage by reducing production costs and
enhancing competitiveness. As manufacturing
enterprises in Thailand realign their strategies in
response to dynamic market forces and technological
advancements, the prudent adoption of these
innovations is poised to play a pivotal role in
sustaining and advancing their competitiveness in the
global marketplace.
Acknowledgement:
The author extends appreciation to all participants
from 20 organizations for granting permission that
facilitated the successful completion of this research.
Furthermore, gratitude is expressed to each
participant for providing invaluable information for
this study, as well as to the anonymous reviewers
whose feedback further enhanced the quality of this
research.
References:
[1] Tansakul, S. & Sutthiwatanaruputh, S. (2014). 7
causes of low level of productivity in Thai labor.
Retrieved from
http://www.thailandfuturefoundation.org/uploa
d/reports/300%20baht_final.pdf
[2] Pay, R. (2006). Everybody’s jumping on the
lean bandwagon, but many are being taken for a
ride lean might not always produce the expected
benefits and here’s why. IndustryWeek, March
11.
[3] Smalley, A. (2005). The starting point for lean
manufacturing: achieving basic stability.
Management Services, 49(4), 8-11.
[4] Marynell, T.M. (2013). Leadership for success
with lean manufacturing: the relationship
between style and successful implementation
(PhD dissertation). Capella University:
Minneapolis, MN.
[5] Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1992). The
balanced scorecard: measures that drive
performance. Harvard Business School Press:
Boston, MA.
[6] Hibadullah, S.N., Fuzi, N.M., ChiekDesa,
A.F.N. & Zamri, F.I.M. (2013). Lean
manufacturing practices and environmental
performance in Malaysian automotive industry.
Asian Journal of Financial & Accounting, 5(1),
462-471.
[7] Fullerton, R.R. & Wempe, W.F. (2009). Lean
manufacturing, non-financial performance
measures, and financial performance.
International Journal of Operation &
Production Management, 29(3), 214-240.
[8] Burawat, P. (2017). The relationships among
lean production, operational performance, and
financial performance in Thai manufacturing
industry. Rajamangala University of
Technology Thanyaburi: Pathumthani,
Thailand.
[9] Heizer, J., Render, B. & Munson, C. (2023).
Operations Management: Sustainability and
Supply Chain Management (14th ed.). Pearson
Education Limited; Harlow.
[10] Yasin, M., & Small, M. (1997). Advanced
Manufacturing Technology: Implementation
Policy and Performance. Journal of Operations
Management, 15, 349-370.
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2024.4.11
Piyachat Burawat
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
107
Volume 4, 2024
[11] Prokopenko, J. (1987). Productivity
management: A practical hand book.
International Labour Office: Geneva.
[12] Drucker, P.F. (1999). Management challenges
for the 21st century. Harper Collins: New York.
[13] Kafile, M. & Fore, S. (2018). Effects of
procurement processes on project execution in a
project management company in Cape Town,
South Africa. International Journal of Business
and Administrative Studies, 4(4), 176-186.
[14] Nissa, N. U., Jhatial, A. A., Nawaz, M., &
Halepota, J. A. (2018). Conflict management
styles (dominating and compromising) of
academic administration and its impact on
faculty job satisfaction and turnover intention.
International Journal of Business and
Administrative Studies, 4(5), 187-196.
[15] Lammon, D. (2010). An examination of
productivity in the utility industry (thesis master
of Arts). Empire State College, State University
of New York: New York.
[16] Riza, A.R. (2011). Methodology development
for calculating productivity and its losses to
determine optimization regime in assembly line
(thesis master of Science). School of
Manufacturing Engineering, University of
Malaysia Perlis: Malaysia.
[17] Stevenson, W.J. (2021). Operations
management (14th ed.). McGraw Hill: New
York, NY.
[18] Arman Design. (1 May 2023). Advanced
production technologies and industry 4.0.
Retrieved from
https://www.armandesign.com/advanced-
production-technologies/
[19] Office of Industrial Economics. (2022). GDP
forecast for the industrial sector. Retrieved from,
https://www.oie.go.th/assets/portals/1/fileups/2/
files/ArticlesAnalysis/Industrial_GDP_Forecast
.pdf
[20] Office of Small and Medium Enterprise
Promotion. (2023). MSME situation report for
2023. Retrieved from,
https://bds.sme.go.th/Files/f5e20d92-138e-
48f2-a29f-5a6c3a37cfd0.pdf
[21] Bangkokbiznews. (2 September 2021). 4 Thai
industries: thriving but not yet fading. Retrieved
from,
https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/blogs/colum
nist/128207
[22] Wahab, N.Y.A.., Musa, R. & Yusoff, S.H.M.
(2021). Measurement validation of factors
influence SME business performance in
Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and
Economics, 18, 1489-1497.
[23] Arumugam, A., Khazaei, H., Bhaumik, A. &
Kanesan, T. (2022). Analysing the factors
influencing digital technology adoption in
manufacturing sectors: leadership effectiveness
as a mediator. WSEAS Transactions on Business
and Economics, 19, 1765-1787.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
Assistant Professor Burawat Piyachat, Ph.D.
Lecturer in management, Rajamangala University of
Technology Thanyaburi
Mailing address: 4th Building, 6th Floor, Faculty of
Business Administration, Major Management,
Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi,
39 Moo1, Klong6, Thanyaburi, Pathumthani,
Thailand, 12110, piyachat_b@rmutt.ac.th
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2024.4.11
Piyachat Burawat
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
108
Volume 4, 2024
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US