Effect of Superplasticizers to Enhance the Properties of Concrete
SALAHALDEIN ALSADEY1, ABDELNASER OMRAN2
1Faculty of Engineering, Bani Waleed University, Bani Walid City, LIBYA
2Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Bright Star University, El-Breqa City, LIBYA
Abstract: This study aimed to study the effects of asuperplasticizing admixture, namely, Sikament-
NN superplasticizer, on concrete properties, such as workability and compressive strength.
Experiments were performed on different concrete mixes with water–cement ratios of 0.50, 0.55,
and 0.60. The superplasticizer dosages by weight of cement were 0%, 0.8%, 1%, and 1.2%. The
experiments were classified into two phases: the first phase focused on the effects of
superplasticizer admixture on workability and compressive strength, and the second phase
determined the influence of superplasticizer admixture on concrete quality by reducing the amount
of mixing water. Results showed that the addition of superplasticizer admixture improved
workability and compressive strength. The experiment program included tests on workability,
slump test, and flow table. For hardened concrete’s compressive strength test, we compared the
properties of superplasticizer-based concrete with those of concrete without superplasticizer. The
superplasticizer led to a significant water reduction but maintained workability.
Keywords: Superplasticizer, compressive strength, slump, workability, admixture.
Received: June 7, 2021. Revised: January 12, 2022. Accepted: February 10, 2022. Published: March 23, 2022.
1. Introduction
Concrete is one of the most commonly used
construction materials in the world. Concrete
technology has made enormous strides in the
past decade. Concrete is no longer a material
consisting of cement, aggregates, water, and
admixtures, but it is an engineered material
with several new constituents. Admixtures are
defined as materials other than cement, water,
and aggregates that are used as an ingredient
of concrete and added to the batch
immediately before or during mixing.
Admixtures are classified into two types:
mineral and chemical admixtures. Water-
reducing admixtures are chemical admixtures
that provide a wide advantage for concrete in
fresh and hardened states. Different water-
reducing admixtures are available in the
market; among them, high-range water-
reducing admixtures are also known as
superplasticizers. Numerous characteristics of
concrete are influenced by the ratio of water
to cementitious materials (w/cm) used in the
mixture. By reducing the amount of water, the
cement paste will have high density, which
results in high paste quality. An increase in
paste quality will yield high compressive
strength. A superplasticizer is an admixture
for concrete that is added to reduce the water
content in a mixture or to slow the setting rate
of concrete while retaining the flowing
properties of a concrete mixture. The use of a
superplasticizer will have positive effects on
the properties of concrete both in the fresh
and hardened states. In the fresh state, use of a
superplasticizer can reduce bleeding due to
the reduction in water–cement ratio or water
content of concrete. If the water–cement ratio
is maintained, then a superplasticizer can
extend the setting time of concrete as more
water is available to lubricate the mix. In the
case of hardened concrete, the use of a
superplasticizer will increase compressive
strength by enhancing the effectiveness of
compaction to produce dense concrete. In
addition, the carbonation rate becomes slower
when the water–cement ratio is decreased
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
84
Volume 2, 2022
with the presence of a superplasticizer [1].
The slump of fresh concrete can be optimally
controlled in all mix designs if reactive
Liboment–163 is added. Given that the
workability of concrete with low water–
cement ratio is difficult to control, the
addition of reactive Liboment–163 can
maintain the initial slump of mixed concrete.
Superplasticizers can produce good quality
concrete by increasing the density of concrete
through a significant reduction in water
requirement and slump loss [2]. Water-
reducing admixtures (superplasticizers) are
generally used in concrete to increase strength
with low water–cement ratios [3, 4].
However, the admixture dosage should be
determined in the laboratory prior to its
application as its excess might result in a
slight improvement or adverse effects on the
performance of roller-compacted concrete [5,
6]. Admixtures can provide considerable
physical and economic benefits with respect
to concrete. However, usage of admixture
does not cure concrete’s poor qualities due to
the use of incorrect mix amounts, poor
workmanship in concrete mixing, and
problems caused by low-quality raw
materials. Superplasticizers are used to
increase workability without changing the
water–cement ratio or increase the ultimate
strength of concrete by reducing the water
content while maintaining adequate
workability. This work was carried out to
study the effect of superplasticizer dosage on
the properties of concrete with reducing
water–cement ratios.
2. Experimental Program
This study aimed to compare the properties of
concrete produced with and without using
Sikament-NN-based superplasticizing
admixture and investigative the effects of
different dosages of Sikament-NN-based
superplasticizing admixture on workability
and strength of concrete.
2.1 Materials Used and Properties
The materials used in this study were cement,
fine, coarse aggregates, and water. A
chemical admixture (superplasticizer) was
added to change the properties of concrete for
certain applications. Materials are important
in determining the quality of the produced
concrete, so they should be properly selected
and chosen before the beginning of the
experiment.
2.1.1 Ordinary Portland cement
Ordinary Portland cement (50 kg) was used
for the entire investigation. The cement used
in this study was a product from A Zlitan
Cement Industries, Libya, where it is widely
used in general construction such as in
buildings, bridges, and other precast concrete
products. Ordinary Portland cement Type-I
used in this experiment conformed to IS.
2.1.2 Fine and Coarse Aggregates
Aggregates are important because they
occupy about 65%–75% of the volume of
concrete. In general, two types of aggregates
are used in concrete, namely,fine and coarse
aggregates. Many parameters need to be
considered in the selection of aggregates, such
as types of aggregate, size and shape of
particles, and strength of aggregates. All
aggregates must be free from dust as dust may
affect the bond between the aggregate and
cement particles. Locally available sea sand
was passed through a sieve of 6mm and used
as fine aggregate in this study. By contrast,
crashed stone with a maximum size of 20 mm
was used as coarse aggregate. Aggregates
were cleaned before mixing to wash away the
fine particles on the surface of the aggregates.
2.1.3 Mixing Water
Water is important to ensure continuous
hydration. Tap water was used for mixing and
curing of concrete. Water must be free from
reactive elements such as reactive ions and
impurities to guarantee the quality of
concrete.
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
85
Volume 2, 2022
2.1.4 Superplasticizer
The superplasticizer used in this study was
Sikament-NN, which is a high-range water-
reducing admixture. One of its benefits is its
ability to develop both early and final
strength. Slump retention and workability of
concrete can also be improved by using
Sikament-NN superplasticizer.
2.2 Proportions for Experimentation
To analyze performance, three design mixes
of concrete with different water–cement ratios
of 0.50, 0.55, and 0.60 and three
superplasticizer dosages of 0.8%, 1%, and
1.2% of cement content required for mix of
normal concrete were prepared. These mixes
were cast in standard concrete cubes. Tests
were conducted with three cubes for one
batch, and the average strength of three cubes
was considered for one proportion. The
various quantities of materials are shown in
Tables 1–3. These three mixes of concrete are
abbreviated in Tables 4 and 5 for further
discussion and interpretation with respect to
normal concrete.
Table 1. Materials Proportion for w/c ratio 0.60
Table 2. Materials Proportion for w/c ratio 0.55
Table 3. Materials Proportion for w/c ratio 0.50
No. of Mix
Dimension (mm)
L×B×H
Concrete Mix
Fine
aggregate
Coarse
aggregate
Water
SP
W/C
kg/m3
kg/m3
kg/m3
%
Mc-1
150×150×150
670
1200
210
0
0.60
MS-2
150×150×150
670
1200
210
0.8
0.60
MS-3
150×150×150
670
1200
210
1.0
0.60
MS-4
150×150×150
670
1200
210
1.2
0.60
No. of Mix
Dimension (mm)
L×B×H
Concrete Mix
Cement
Fine
aggregate
Coarse
aggregate
Water
SP
W/C
kg/m3
kg/m3
kg/m3
kg/m3
%
Mc-1
150×150×150
350
670
1200
192.5
0
0.55
MS-2
150×150×150
350
670
1200
192.5
0.8
0.55
MS-3
150×150×150
350
670
1200
192.5
1.0
0.55
MS-4
150×150×150
350
670
1200
192.5
1.2
0.55
No. of Mix
Dimension (mm)
L×B×H
Concrete Mix
Cement
Fine
aggregate
Coarse
aggregate
Water
SP
W/C
kg/m3
kg/m3
kg/m3
kg/m3
%
Mc-1
150×150×150
350
670
1200
175
0
0.50
MS-2
150×150×150
350
670
1200
175
0.8
0.50
MS-3
150×150×150
350
670
1200
175
1.0
0.50
MS-4
150×150×150
350
670
1200
175
1.2
0.50
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
86
Volume 2, 2022
3. Results and Discussions
This study analyzed the influence of
increasing water reduction with different
dosages of superplasticizer (Sikament-NN
superplasticizer of the weight of cementitious
material) on the characteristics of concrete
with and without superplasticizer.
3.1 Effect of Superplasticizer with Reduced
WaterCement Ratio on Workability
The results for slump and flow of
superplasticizer concrete are shown in Table
4. The data show the relation between dosages
of superplasticizer and slump and flow. The
values of slump and flow for different
superplasticizer dosages were then plotted as
a graph (Figures 1 and 2). The graph shows
the slump and flow against different
superplasticizer dosages. The slump and flow
increased with increasing superplasticizer
dosages. Moreover, increasing the dosage of
superplasticizer increased the workability of
concrete, because the superplasticizer helped
retain the concrete in liquid state for a long
time and reduced slump loss during the
transportation of concrete to the site.
However, overdosage of superplasticizer
could lead to high workability, which would
not yield the true expected and desired slump.
The superplasticizer significantly increased
the workability of concrete due to
deflocculation and adsorption of highly
negative charges on cement particles. Before
adding the superplasticizer, the concrete was
less cohesive and presented a small diameter
(less than 500mm). According to BS 1881:
Part 105: 1984, concrete can only be
considered uniform and cohesive when it
possesses a diameter between 500 and 650
mm. After adding the superplasticizer, this
desired diameter was achieved. Hence,
superplasticizer concrete was cohesive in
accordance with BS 1881.
Table 4. Workability Obtained for various ratios during the experiment
No.
Proportions
Slump (mm)
Flow (mm)
1
Control Mix, For w/c -0.60
130
455
2
w/c-0.60 & SP-0.8
150
530
3
w/c-0.60 & SP-1.0
240
625
4
w/c-0.60 & SP-1.2
250
660
5
Control Mix, For w/c -0.55
90
365
6
w/c-0.55 & SP-0.8
130
480
7
w/c-0.55 & SP-1.0
200
540
8
w/c-0.55 & SP-1.2
220
575
9
Control Mix, For w/c -0.50
50
305
10
w/c-0.50 & SP-0.8
110
405
11
w/c-0.50 & SP-1.0
130
445
12
w/c-0.50 & SP-1.2
140
490
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
87
Volume 2, 2022
Fig. 1. Combination of graphs showing the results of slump at different w/c ratio of concrete by
using three different dosages of superplasticizer and a conventional concrete
Fig. 2. Test result showing effect of superplasticizer on water reduction and flow table test at
different w/c ratio of concrete
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
88
Volume 2, 2022
3.2 Effect of Superplasticizer with Reduced
WaterCement Ratio on Compressive
Strength
The compressive strength of concrete with
different superplasticizer dosages with
reduced water–cement ratio is shown in Table
5. This test was performed for 28 days. The
values of compressive strength for different
superplasticizer dosages were plotted as a
graph in Figure 3. The graph of compressive
strength versus water–cement ratio of
concrete revealed that the compressive
strength of the chemical admixture increased
with reducing water–cement ratio compared
with that of the control mix. In terms of the
influenceof the admixturedosage, the
superplasticizer presented different effects on
the compressive strength of concrete.
Increasing superplasticizer dosage elevated
the compressive strength for all mixes
compared with the control mix. Theaddition
of superplasticizer providedadditionalwater
for concrete mixing, and the hydration
process was accelerated by the additional
water from deflocculation of cement particles.
Hence, increase in dosage could increase the
entrapped water and promote the hydration of
cement. Although increasing the dosage of
admixture couldenhance the compressive
strength, an optimum limit was found for the
usage of admixture. When the dosages
exceeded this limit, an increase in dosage only
reduced the compressive strength. This
phenomenon occurred because overdosage of
superplasticizer could cause bleeding and
segregation, thereby affecting the
cohessiveness and uniformity of concrete.
Therefore, compressive strength
decreasedwhenthe used dosage exceeded the
optimum dosage. The optimum dosage of
superplasticizer was based on the highest
ultimate strength at 28 days. The graph
demonstrated that the optimum dosage for the
admixture was 0.8% by weight of cement.
Any dosage higher than this optimum value
couldreduce the compressive strength,which
wasstill higher than that of the control mix.
For accurate and precise results, additional
dosages with small intervals should be
investigated for a curve with the best fit.
Table 5.Compressive strength and Density
Sr No.
Proportions
Density
g/cm3
Compressive Strength (Map)
28 Days
1
Control Mix, For w/c -0.60
2.389
27.3
2
w/c-0.60 & SP-0.8
2.328
35.13
3
w/c-0.60 & SP-1.0
2.283
31.56
4
w/c-0.60 & SP-1.2
2.248
29.56
5
Control Mix, For w/c -0.55
2.397
30.6
6
w/c-0.55 & SP-0.8
2.289
38.76
7
w/c-0.55 & SP-1.0
2.277
33
8
w/c-0.55 & SP-1.2
2.266
31.9
9
Control Mix, For w/c -0.50
2.397
36.3
10
w/c-0.50 & SP-0.8
2.401
44.7
11
w/c-0.50 & SP-1.0
2.327
39.2
12
w/c-0.50 & SP-1.2
2.325
38.4
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
89
Volume 2, 2022
Fig. 3. Test result of the graph showing compressive strength at different w/c ratio of concrete with
superplasticizer dosages
4. Conclusion
This study was conducted to study the effect
of a superplasticizer on the properties of
concrete. The properties examined were
workability (slump) and compressive
strength. Results demonstrated that the
properties of concrete in fresh and hardened
stages were enhanced with the addition of
superplasticizer for all nominal mixes of
concrete. Sikament-NN increased the
compressive strength, workability, and water
reduction requirements of concrete.
Moreover, the workability of concrete
increased with the addition of
superplasticizer. However, high dosages of
superplasticizer impaired the cohesiveness of
concrete. Slump was increased by using the
chemical admixture, but effectiveness was
high for superplasticizer concrete.
References
[1] Alsadey, S. Influence of Superplasticizer
on Strength of Concrete. International Journal
of Research in Engineering and
Technology,2012, 1(3):164-166.
[1] Alsadey, S. Effect of Superplasticizer on
Fresh and Hardened Properties of Concrete,
Journal of Agricultural Science and
Engineering, 2015, 1(2): 70-74.
[2] YoyokSetyo Hadiwidodo, S.B.M. Effect
Superplasticizer and Water-Binder Ratio on
Freshened Properties and Compressive
Strength of SCC. Journal of Engineering and
Applied Sciences,2009, 4: 232-235.
[3] Oyekan, G., Oyelade, O. Crushed Waste
Glass as a Partial Replacement of Cement in
Normal Concrete Production with Sugar
Added as an Admixture. Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences,2011, 6:
369-372.
[4] Fuhrman R. L. Engineering and design
roller compacted concrete, Department of the
army US Army Corps of Engineers. EM 1110-
2-2006. Washington DC, USA: U.S.
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers,
2000.
[5] Gregory, E., Halsted, P.E. Roller-
Compacted Concrete Pavements for
Highways and Streets. Annual Conference of
the Transportation Association of Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia. British
Columbia, Canada, 2009.
[6] British Standards Institution, BS 12;
Specifications for Portland cement, BSI,
London, 1996
[7] Building Research Establishment Report.
Design of normal concrete mixes, 1988
[8] BS1881-125: (method of mixing and
sampling fresh concrete in the
laboratory).
[9] British Standards Institution, BS Part
102. Testing Concrete, Method for
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
90
Volume 2, 2022
Determination of Slump, 1983, BSI, London,
1881.
[10] British Standard Institution, BS 1881:
Part 3. Methods of Making Curing and Test
Specimens, 1970.
[11] British Standard Institution, BS 1881:
Part 116. “Methods for Determination of
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cube”
BSI, London, 1983.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
DOI: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13
Salahaldein Alsadey, Abdelnaser Omran
E-ISSN: 2732-9984
91
Volume 2, 2022