Internet of Things in Education:
Teachers’ Perspectives, Practices and Challenges
FAISAL ALOUFI1, MOHAMMAD A. TASHTOUSH2,3, NAWAL SHIRAWIA3,
RAMI A. TASHTOUSH4,5, EMAD A. AZ-ZO’BI6
1Bukayriyah Education,
Ministry of Education,
Bukayriyah,
SAUDIA ARABIA
2Department of Basic Sciences,
AL-Huson University College,
AL-Balqa Applied University,
Al-Salt,
JORDAN
3Department of Mathematics Education
Faculty of Education & Arts,
Sohar University,
Sohar,
OMAN
4Department of Psychology
Faculty of Educational Sciences,
Sultan Qaboos University,
Muscat,
OMAN
5Department of Counselling & Educational Psychology
Faculty of Educational Sciences,
Yarmouk University,
Irbid,
JORDAN
6Department of Mathematics,
Faculty of Sciences,
Mutah University,
Karak,
JORDAN
Abstract: - The current study aims to detect the level of challenges facing teachers in applying the Internet of
Things (IoT) in the educational process. It also investigates the teachers' perceptions regarding the importance of
using IoT in the educational process. This study adopts a quantitative approach to analyze the use of IoT amongst
Saudi secondary school teachers. The study recruited (142) teachers in schools in the Riyadh region. A
questionnaire with (26) Likert Scale items was distributed electronically to the participants. Results indicated that
Saudi teachers still face high challenges in applying IoT in teaching and learning, they also report a high
importance of using IoT. Results also showed that specialization, year of service, and the training technical
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
429
Volume 12, 2024
programs played a significant role in the perceptions of Saudi teachers. Specifically, computer science teachers
have less challenge in applying IoT when compared to teachers from other specializations. Furthermore, the study
showed that teachers with less experience had higher means, indicating their enthusiasm for utilizing modern
technological tools in education. Finally, the study showed that teachers who had completed more technical
training programs had less difficulty in applying IoT. The study recommends integrating IoT technologies into the
educational system. It also proposes conducting research to standardize IoT applications for different teaching
materials and all levels of schooling.
Key-Words: - Challenges, Communications Network, Education, Importance, Internet of Things, Practices,
Computing Systems, Importance of IoT.
1 Introduction
We are currently witnessing a substantial revolution
in information and technology that has deeply
influenced our daily lives. The technological
revolution has transformed various fields. It brings
up new opportunities for development. Beginning
with the era of computing and personal computers in
the 1980s and 1990s, and evolving into the mobile
era with the launch of the iPhone in 2007, computing
has entered a new phase. Internet technology has
progressed, making communication and interaction
among individuals easier, [1], [2]. The rapid
evolution of internet usage has opened up new
chances for incorporating the internet into our daily
lives, making smart devices interact more easily with
each other. The main goal is to create an improved
reality where individuals can communicate and
interact with devices and tools based on their
preferences and needs, without the constraints of
physical presence in a specific time or location, [3].
Upon initial examination, it is evident that the
concept of internet-connected devices or things has
given rise to a new iteration of the internet, leading to
a greater dependence on it. This allows anything to
be connected to the internet and imbued with
intelligence. Connected devices are capable of
communication, information sharing, exchange,
processing, and even decision-making. This concept
is known as the Internet of Things (henceforth, IoT),
which is seen as the imminent major technological
frontier that will pave the way for a revolution in
various areas of our lives, [4].
IoT refers to the emerging and evolving new
generation of information and communication
technologies that enhance the ability of physical
objects and machines to connect and exchange data
through internet connectivity, [5], [6]. This
development provides high-quality systems and
technologies that increase productivity, create
modern business, industrial, and educational models,
generate new sources of income, and represent the
most significant features of the Fourth Industrial
Revolution. The IoT has great potential to integrate
all aspects of natural and digital life in fields such as
commerce, industry, medicine, agriculture, and
education, which has had a profound impact on
changing the current lifestyle. Similar to the previous
three industrial revolutions, the IoT is changing the
pattern of human life, [7], [8].
The benefits of employing IoT in education
include personalized learning experiences, improved
classroom management, and increased efficiency in
administrative tasks. The Intentional Conference on
IoT proposes the incorporation of IoT into learning
institutions as such integration develops learning
outcomes and equips students with skills required for
the digital future. Nevertheless, such integration is
not without potential challenges, including privacy
concerns, security as well as the necessity for
adequate infrastructure and educator training, [9]. In
Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, there is a
growing interest in using IoT in education, but there
are still obstacles that hinder its widespread adoption.
Overall, the use of IoT in education has the potential
to improve learning outcomes and the quality of the
educational process by providing real-time data and
personalized support for learners.
Based on the recommendations of the World IoT
Conference held in Saudi Arabia in December 2019,
which focused on the significance of employing IoT
in the educational process, and due to the rapid
progress in the information and technological
revolution in the field of education. Furthermore, the
Received: February 12, 2024. Revised: July 12, 2024. Accepted: August 12, 2024. Published: September 27, 2024.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
430
Volume 12, 2024
lack of studies that have examined the importance of
using IoT in education in Arab countries in general,
and Saudi Arabia in particular. Still, the urgent need
to update the skills, experiences, and orientations of
students to enable them to deal with the information
and technological revolution in education. All these
factors urged the researcher to bridge such a gap by
detecting the level of importance and challenges that
Saudi teachers have while utilizing IoT and using it
in different educational environments significantly
contributes to the quality of the educational process
and improves learning outcomes. Therefore, this
study is important to answer the questions:
RQ1. What is the level of challenges facing Saudi
teachers in applying IoT in the educational
process?
RQ2. To what extent do Saudi teachers perceive the
significance of using IoT in the educational
process?
RQ3. Are there statistically significant differences in
teachers' perspectives about the significance of
using IoT and the challenges they face
attributed to specialization, years of service,
and technical training programs?.
2 Literature Review
The IoT has been defined variously among
researchers and experts. For instance, [10], defined it
as an interactive internet connection between
computers, smart devices, and many other objects,
enabling them to transmit and receive data, [11],
Viewed IoT as the active connection of many
everyday items and objects to the internet, such as
alarms, mirrors, rain umbrellas, shoes, and others, to
create a better living environment and accomplish
easier tasks. Meanwhile, IoT was perceived as the
communication and control of objects equipped with
suitable sensors through a network connection to
accomplish specific tasks, [12], [13].
In the context of the IoT, the term "Things"
refers to the objects that can be identified and
connected to the internet using established internet
protocols. These objects communicate and share with
each other over the internet without direct human
interaction, utilizing a common language of
communication. Each of these objects is assigned its
own unique internet protocol (IP). Interestingly, even
humans can be considered as "Things" if they are
attached to a specific IP address, such as through
wearable devices like glasses, watches, bracelets, or
electronic clothing. These connected "Things" are
equipped with advanced capabilities in
understanding, analyzing, and processing
information. They respond to commands, analyze
data, generate insights, and can issue commands or
perform actions based on their high-level
technological skills, [14].
In this study, IoT is procedurally defined as a
group of updated devices, software, and connected
remote sensors via the Internet, making them capable
of sending and receiving data and interacting with
them by humans. Furthermore, the challenges of
implementing IoT are seen as a set of difficulties and
obstacles facing teachers, both male and female,
during the application of the IoT, which prevent the
optimal use of it in teaching.
IoT has led to the emergence of smart
environments that include various household
appliances, security systems, building entrances, air
conditioning systems, and commercial goods. This
technology has revolutionized several settings,
including homes, companies, factories, farms,
universities, hospitals, and laboratories, [15]. IoT
consists of three main elements: things, which refer
to everything that can be connected to the internet
through a small data chip without human interaction,
such as household appliances, cars, transportation,
energy, food, and even the human or animal body.
The second element is communication networks that
connect these things, and the last element is
computing systems that process the data sent and
received by the things, [16], [17]. Figure 1 illustrates
these components.
IoT is a means of communication between
interconnected devices through sensors, actuators,
and various artificial intelligence tools. It operates
within the advancements in data transmission
generation like 5G, satellite software development,
and remote sensing. Operating IoT requires
establishing a set of rules that govern device
communication, along with defining cloud storage
points and developing web-based platforms to
provide advanced systems and technologies for
enhanced productivity, [18], [19].
Therefore, IoT is an important modern
technology that has brought about a significant
revolution in the tech world. It can be used to
enhance the teaching process by providing a variety
of applications that can greatly improve the
attainment of educational objectives and boost the
performance of both students and teachers, [20], [21].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
431
Volume 12, 2024
Fig. 1: Components of IoT
The proliferation of internet-connected devices is
rapidly increasing, leading many experts research
institutions, and analysts to predict the IoT future and
its pivotal impact on internet networks. Juniper
Research Group in 2015 revealed that there were an
estimated 13.4 billion devices linked to the internet;
this exceeds the world population at the study time.
According to Gartner's statistics for 2021, the new
devices which link the internet amount to 21.8
billion. As per Gartner's 2021 statistics,
approximately 21.8 billion new devices were
connected to the internet. Additionally, a Machine
Research study in 2023 projected that the number of
internet-connected devices would exceed 28 billion.
Furthermore, a study by Machine Research in 2023
predicted that 28 billion devices would be linked to
the internet, [22]. Experts such as, [10], [17], have
highlighted the vast potential of IoT perceiving it as a
field that encompasses billions of connected devices.
IoT uses both hardware and software components to
exchange data through a variety of communication
protocols. The applications of IoT span across
various domains including medical, industrial,
agricultural, economic, and educational fields.
Human creativity fuels the boundless potential for
applying IoT in many sectors, such as healthcare,
smart homes, agriculture, smart cities, and education
as seen in Figure 2.
2.1 IoT in Education
Education has been revolutionized using technology.
It innovatively provides ways to engage students in
the learning process. IoT was widely adopted and
extended its impact on various areas of life where
education is one aspect. This motivates many
individual and institutional research efforts to
propping the significance of such efforts. Scientific
events and blogs extensively discuss the potential of
IoT in education. The focus pinpoints the advantages
of IoT as well as areas of further investigation, [13].
IoT potentially participates in developing the system
of education in its various stages. Not only students
but also teachers and institutions felt the privilege of
IoT due to the shift it results while ceasing traditional
teaching and encouraging high tech-based teaching.
It also helps in improving the infrastructures of
schooling worldwide. To sum up, IoT shapes the
ways in which we as teachers teach as well as the
ways how our students learn, [22].
Fig. 2: Areas of IoT
2.2 Advantages of Using IoT in Education
IoT has been found to have numerous advantages in
the field of education. In education, IoT has been
reported to have various benefits. It encourages
virtual learning which enables students to learn at a
time and place suitable for them according to some
studies. Students' engagement is prestigious in this
teaching mode. Thus, students can check their
progress due to the feedback they immediately
receive from their teachers, [20], [23]. Furthermore,
IoT celebrates lifelong learning. Students can enroll
in online programs and receive their degrees. They
can participate in online learning to enhance their
qualification. Teachers still make use of the IoT
features. They can get access to various
learning/teaching materials related to their
curriculum. They can also design their course
contents using various applications. Teachers can
contact their students at any time. Monitors can also
easily attend virtual classrooms to evaluation the
teaching/learning process, [20], [21]. IoT is possibly
incorporated in the process of education, [24].
Teachers can facilitate students retrieving the
learning materials virtually using the instructional
plan.
Smart Home
Health Care
Smart CitiesAgriculture
Teaching and
Learning
Areas
of IoT
IoT
Things
Commenications
Network
Computing Systems
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
432
Volume 12, 2024
Collaborative learning is an interesting
environment that teachers can utilize by leveraging
interactive applications. Teaching materials based on
three dimensions can be created via IoT which
enables both teachers and students to surf the internet
electronically. IoT applications can be incorporated
to save students' privacy and risk that they may
encounter in physical classrooms. These applications
are voice communication tools, 3D location tracking
technologies, wireless watches, and smart cameras.
Furthermore, [25], [26], studied the privilege of using
IoT technology to develop the system of education.
They found that IoT can participate in creating a
motivational learning environment; it can also
develop education services virtually for students and
instructors. New opportunities for improving the
learning/teaching process can be sought due to the
incorporation of IoT in academia.
2.3 Challenges in Using IoT in Education
Nevertheless, IoT is not without defects. A very high
percentage amounted to 75% of IoT-based projects
fail. The majority of these projects fail at the
application stages according to Cisco Networking
Academy. A primitive challenge stems from the
inability to produce IoT devices with low or
considerable prices. IoT spread is contingent on the
affordance of learning institutions to establish
communication devices that enable interacting
surrounds via actuators and sensors, [27]. Energy
consumption is another challenge for installing IoT
devices. Still, a third source of challenge results from
the available big data where IoT acts. These huge
data deprive IoT from participating effectively in
improving education, [28].
Several studies pinpointed the challenges
resulting from incorporating IoT, [26], [27], [28].
They listed them in disruptions, privacy violations,
data espionage, hacking, and weak internet
connection. Another plight to them is the resistances
that accompany change resulting from complexities
of IoT, technical vulnerabilities, insufficient
technological development, high energy
consumption, security vulnerabilities, weak
infrastructure, and human errors. Furthermore, the
social, psychological, and health challenges that
students face in using IoT technologies include
increased sedentary behavior, leading to health risks
like obesity, social isolation, and addiction. An
additional concern is the fear of job displacement due
to the reliance of most jobs on technology, raising
uncertainties about students' future prospects.
Finally, [29], [30], explored the concept of the IoT on
campus and the related infrastructure of the
university campus. The study concluded that it is
important to use new technologies through IoT
applications specific to the university campus to
achieve the concept of a smart university capable of
supporting senior management, educational
activities, research activities, increasing needs, and
environmental challenges.
2.4 IoT in Saudi Arabia
IoT has been examined in Saudi Arabia by a few
studies, 30, [31]. However, such studies whether
examined higher education facility members, for
example, [5], explored the potential benefits and
obstacles associated with using the Internet of Things
(IoT) in Saudi universities, as seen through the eyes
of faculty members from diverse sectors including
education and learning, human resources, energy,
transportation, public infrastructure, safety and
security, and data analysis. The study listed the
challenges in applying IoT by weak infrastructure,
data breaches and leaks, increased economic costs,
and privacy breaches. Another study focused on
students, investigated the efficacy of IoT
technologies in a personalized learning environment
for developing cognitive achievement in linear
programming skills in mathematics among female
middle school students. The study employed a
personalized learning environment and a cognitive
achievement test for linear programming skills as
research tools. Results indicated that the use of IoT
technologies was effective in improving cognitive
achievement in linear programming skills in
mathematics among the participants, [31].
On the other hand, [32], focused on the important
features and benefits of the used of IoT and its
contribution to educating and raising awareness
among learners about the advantages of using IoT
technologies in the learning and teaching process.
The study also addressed the major challenges and
obstacles that hinder the use of IoT in the learning
and teaching process. In other Arabic sittings, like
Jordan, [32], investigated the effectiveness of using
IoT to develop reading and writing skills among 7th-
grade female students. To achieve this, the
researchers prepared a test that was administered to
50 students. The study results showed the effects of
teaching using IoT technologies. Such studies
clarified the IoT in the Saudi context, however, there
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
433
Volume 12, 2024
is still a crucial need to explore the importance and
challenges of adopting IoT amongst Saudi secondary
schools in Riyadh as the previous studies were
conducted in other Saudi governorates.
3 Methodologies
3.1 Research Design
This study adopts an analytical descriptive approach
that is suitable for examining the IoT in education.
This approach is comprehensive and flexible. It
allows for the researchers to analyze and compare the
phenomenon with others, while also pinpointing the
causes of its emergence, this methodology enables
the accurate determination of results and conclusions.
This study was conducted in Saudi Arabia, for the
academic year 2022/2023.
3.2 Participants
The participants of this study consist of 142 teachers
(males and females) in schools in Riyadh Saudi
Arabia during the academic year 2022/2023. The
sample of the study was selected by using the simple
random method, and a questionnaire was distributed
electronically to the participants. Participants were
introduced to the aim of the study and asked whether
they could participate (Table 1, Figure 3, Figure 4
and Figure 5).
Table 1. Study Sample Distribution
Percentage
Frequency
Variable
32.4%
46
Specialization
34.5%
49
33.1%
47
41.5%
59
Years of
Service
32.5%
46
26%
37
24.6%
35
Technical
training
programs
33.1%
47
43.7%
62
Fig. 3: Participants according to the specialization
Fig. 4: Participants according to the number of years
of services
Fig. 5: Participants according to the technical training
programs
3.3 Instrument
A questionnaire was developed to measure the IoT,
drawing on relevant research studies, [33], [34]. The
questionnaire comprised 26 items divided into two
domains: (1) The challenges encountered by male
and female teachers when implementing the IoT in
the educational process, with 12 items, and (2) The
significance of utilizing the IoT in the educational
process, contained 14 items. The scale was built by a
32,4
34,5
33,1
Specialization
Math
Computer
Science
41,5
32,5
26
Numbers of Years of Services
Less than 7
Beteen 7 & 15
Gretear than 15
24,6
33,1
43,7
Numbers of Technical Programs
less than 3
Between 3 & 6
Gretear than 7
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
434
Volume 12, 2024
five-point scale Likert, with each item offering 5
answers: (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and
strongly dis-agree) and assigned values from five to
one, respectively.
The questionnaire validity was ensured by giving
feedback from some experts’ committees. Their
opinions were used to modify certain items of the
scale until its final form was achieved. In order to
ensure the questionnaire's reliability, the coefficient
of Cronbach's alpha was calculated for the overall
questionnaire for each domain, and for each
individual item. This was done by using an
exploratory sample consisting of 24 teachers. The
resulting values, ranging (from 0.73 - 0.92), and
(0.83, 0.86, 0.89) for the first, second, and for the
overall domains, confirm the reliability of the IoT
scale for achieving the study's objectives.
3.4 Statistical Analysis
The data was entered by using SPSS (Version 27),
and the arithmetic means; and standard deviations
were calculated for each paragraph of the
questionnaire. One-way analysis of variance
ANOVA tests were also used to detect significant
differences between the means of the study
participants' responses, since ANOVA test aimed at
comparing means or determining whether there are
significant differences among the arithmetic means
performances of groups subjected to different
treatments, with the aim of identifying factors that
cause one mean to differ from others.
4 Results
4.1 What is the Level of Challenges Facing
Saudi Teachers in Applying IoT in the
Educational Process?
Table 2 indicates that there is a high challenge
(M=4.13, SD=1.08) facing teachers when applying
the IoT in the educational process. The first rank
mean is 4.52 for the ninth item, with an SD is 1.19.
The second-rank mean is 4.51 for the second item,
with SD being 1.31. The third-rank mean is 4.44 for
the eighth item, with SD being 1.13. As for the last
ranking occupied by item six with mean is: 4.35 and
SD is: 0.96. These results show the most important
challenges facing mathematics teachers in their use
of IoT technologies were the lack of desire among
teachers to develop the educational process resulting
from the use of IoT technologies, and that the large
burdens placed on them prevent them from using
them, in addition to the difficulty of using them by
teachers and some students alike.
4.2 To What Extent Do Saudi Teachers
Perceive the Significance of using IoT?
The study's findings, as shown in Table 3, reveal that
Saudi teachers perceive highly the significance of
using IoT technologies, with an arithmetic mean of:
3.95 and SD is: 1.10. Notably, item 24 ranked first
with an arithmetic mean of: 4.38 and SD of: 1.22.
Item 26 ranked second with an arithmetic mean of:
4.22 and an SD of: 1.19. Similarly, item 15 ranked
third with an arithmetic mean of: 4.19 and SD of:
1.21. These results underscore the significance of
integrating IoT technologies into the educational
process to enhance teaching and learning outcomes.
By incorporating IoT technologies into the
curriculum, students are provided with opportunities
to develop critical thinking skills, engage in self-
learning, and experience a stimulating and
competitive learning environment. Additionally, item
20 received an arithmetic mean of: 3.52 and an SD
of: 0.88. In summary, these findings highlight the
potential benefits of leveraging IoT technologies in
education for improved instructional practices and
enhanced student outcomes.
4.3 Are There Statistically Significant
Differences in Teachers' Perspectives
about the Significance of IoT and the
Challenges they Face Attributed to
Specialization, Years of Service, and
Technical Training Programs?
Table 4 shows the mean scores and SD for the
participants according to the study variables
regarding the importance of using IoT technologies
from the teacher’s perspective and the challenges,
with respect to the study variables.
To detect whether there is a sign. differences
between the means of Saudi teachers' regarding the
importance of using IoT technologies and the
challenges, based on the variable of specialization,
ANOVA analysis was used.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
435
Volume 12, 2024
Table 2. Challenges facing teachers in applying the IoT in the educational process
Table 3. The significance of applying the IoT
SD
Mean
Item
No
1.01
3.87
IoT helps with flexibility in selecting and designing educational material
13
1.13
3.95
IoT allows students' performance to be monitored automatically
14
1.21
4.19
IoT as an educational method facilitates education and develops student
performance
15
0.97
3.82
Using IoT in teaching and learning develops the spirit of challenge, competition,
and excitement among students
16
1.26
4.01
I provide assistance to students who have little experience in using IoT
17
0.97
3.86
IoT helps students make appropriate educational decisions for them
18
0.92
3.72
IoT saves time and effort in the educational process
19
0.88
3.52
IoT allows monitoring students and tracking attendance and absence
20
1.23
3.79
IoT helps in managing and monitoring students remotely
21
1.21
3.96
The use of IoT takes into account individual differences among students
22
1.19
4.13
The use of IoT helps students in self-learning
23
1.22
4.23
IoT provides appropriate feedback to the teacher
24
1.06
4.06
IoT is considered a guide and facilitator for the student learning process
25
1.19
4.22
Using IoT helps students develop their critical thinking skills
26
1.10
3.95
Average
Table 4. Distribution of participants according to the variables
SD
Mean
Category
Variable
7.95
58.69
Mathematics
Specialization
8.02
60.27
Computer
7.92
58.09
Sciences
7.85
59.65
Less than 7
Years of Service
7.72
58.16
7 15
7.29
55.57
More than 16
6.95
59.62
Less than 3
Technical Training Programs
7.12
60.55
3 – 6
7.16
62.32
More than 7
SD
Mean
Item
No
1.31
4.04
Weak Internet network and outages
1
0.91
4.51
Privacy breaches and data and information spying
2
1.25
4.36
Poor technological development of devices
3
1.31
4.12
Fear of technical glitches
4
0.95
3.75
Lack of desire to develop the educational process
5
0.96
4.35
The school curricula do not include using IoT in teaching and learning
6
1.06
4.06
Lack of training in using IoT technologies and weak technical support
7
1.13
4.44
Dismissal of some educational positions in the future
8
1.19
4.52
The large burden placed on teachers prevents them from using IoT
technologies
9
0.97
3.86
High financial cost
10
1.02
3.82
Fear of equipment malfunction
11
1.01
3.82
High power consumption for devices connected to the IoT.
12
1.08
4.13
Average
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
436
Volume 12, 2024
Table 5. ANOVA analysis according to specialization
Domains
S.S.
d.f.
M.S.
F
Sig.
The difficulties of
applying the IoT in the
educational process
Between-Groups
305.65
2
152.82
0.93
0.045
Within Groups
22965.63
140
164.04
Total
23271.28
142
The importance of
applying the IoT in the
educational process
Between Groups
286.36
2
143.18
0.92
0.062
Within Groups
21589.62
140
154.21
Total
21875.98
142
Table 6. ANOVA analysis according to years of service
Domains
S.S.
d.f.
M.S.
F
Sig.
Difficulties of
applying the IoT
Between Groups
235.15
2
117.575
0.78
0.035
Within Groups
20895.97
140
149.25
Total
21131.12
142
Significance of
applying the IoT
Between Groups
206.44
2
103.22
0.70
0.030
Within Groups
20771.55
140
148.36
Total
20977.99
142
Table 7. ANOVA analysis according to the technical training programs
Domains
S.S.
d.f.
M.S.
F
Sig.
Difficulties of applying
the IoT in the
educational process
Between Groups
214.87
2
107.44
0.68
0.042
Within Groups
21985.62
140
157.04
Total
22200.49
142
The importance of
applying the IoT in the
educational process
Between Groups
197.21
2
98.60
0.70
0.044
Within Groups
19584.66
140
139.89
Total
21875.98
142
Table 5 indicates that there are signs differences
between the Saudi teachers' perceptions regarding the
challenges in using IoT, based on their specialization.
Specifically, teachers specializing in computer
science scored higher when compared to teachers
from other specializations. This suggests that
computer science teachers may have greater skills,
knowledge, and experience in utilizing IoT
technologies. However, there is no significant
difference in the perceptions of Saudi teachers
regarding the significance of using IoT for their
specialization. This suggests a consensus among
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
437
Volume 12, 2024
teachers, irrespective of their fields of expertise,
regarding the significance of integrating IoT
technologies into education. To discern whether there
are statistically significant variations in the
perceptions of Saudi teachers concerning the
importance of utilizing IoT technologies and the
obstacles they encounter, based on their years of
service, a One-Way ANOVA test was employed, see
Table 6.
Table 6 describes that there is a sign differences
in Saudi teachers' perceptions of the difficulties they
face in applying IoT attributed to the years of service.
Interestingly, teachers with less experience had
higher means, indicating their enthusiasm for
utilizing modern technological tools in education. To
investigate whether there is a sig. differences in the
perceptions of Saudi teachers regarding the
importance of using IoT technologies and the
challenges they face, based on the technical training
programs, ANOVA analysis was conducted, see
Table 7.
Table 7 reveals that there is a sign. the difference
for arithmetic means of the Saudi teachers for
difficulties in applying IoT according to the technical
programs. However, there is no sign. the difference
in the perceptions of Saudi teachers regarding the
importance of applying the IoT. This suggests that
completed high technical training programs tend to
have higher means in the first domain.
5 Discussions
The results of the current study on the challenges
faced by Saudi teachers in applying IoT in the
educational process clearly show that there are high
levels of challenges that hinder Saudi teachers from
the ideal application of IoT. This includes weak
internet network and disconnection, fear of device
failure, privacy breaches, fear of technical
vulnerabilities and espionage on information,
reluctance of teachers to develop the educational
process, lack of training on using IoT technologies,
weak technological development, and lack of
experience and training in using these advanced
technologies. This is especially true for teachers who
have more years of service and are less proficient in
using these advanced technologies and have not
undergone sufficient technical training courses from
various scientific disciplines. They may believe that
using this type of high-quality technology requires
more time and effort than using traditional methods
they have been following for years during their
service, especially since there are many burdens and
duties that require them to hold tests, correct them,
evaluate students' tools, and prepare daily lessons and
administrative work.
The current study showed the high level of
connectedness between teachers and IoT technology
while incorporating the IoT in the learning/education
process. This high connection with technology can be
explained by the high skills that teachers master and
their knowledge of the up-to-date information
affiliated with IoT. However, the missing teaching
instructions and roles challenge IoT's future. This
technology-based learning creates a new learning
environment which teachers should be aware of.
These findings are confirmed with [34], [35]. Using
modern technology needs high training for
participants and users. Such lack of training and
insufficient teachers’ support set a challenge for
teachers in underutilizing IoT in the learning process.
Another challenge in addition to what has been
mentioned is the low number of trainers and experts
in IoT when compared to other fields. To sum up, the
success of utilizing IoT in the education process
requires the availability of competent expertise in the
field. These technical skills and expertise are ensure
good investment in technology in education.
The study's findings show a high level of the
importance of using IoT technologies in education,
regardless of teachers' expertise, years of service, or
training. Teachers recognize the value of IoT for
flexible material selection, self-learning
opportunities, and critical thinking skill development.
IoT also teaches basic skills, provides feedback to
teachers, and considers individual differences among
students. These findings agree with some studies, [3],
[28], that affirmed of using modern strategies that
rely on IoT to have positive effects for the motivation
of students, challenging spirit, excitement, and
competition. Incorporating IoT into curricula and
utilizing it in teaching improves learning outcomes
by providing flexibility in presenting materials,
facilitating monitoring of student performance, and
tracking attendance. This saves the efforts and time
of teachers and develops the quality of learning
outputs.
Results also revealed signs. differences in the
perceptions of Saudi teachers regarding the
importance of using IoT technologies in education.
Moral differences are reported in the attitudes of
Saudi teachers regarding incorporating IoT
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
438
Volume 12, 2024
technology in education in some variables.
Completion of training course, field of experience,
and year of service are examples. Results reported
that Science teachers with newly hired PCs and who
received extensive training have reported high and
moral significance in using IoT technology. Due to
the high training they received, they construct a
reliable plan to incorporate IoT in the teaching
process; they also get high access to learning and
teaching sources and support they need. The
teaching/learning process can be developed due to
the availability of applications responsible for
developing instructing, bringing challenges to the
students, and keeping them enthusiastic. Such
findings agreed with, [36], [37], [38], who confirmed
the positive impact resulting from levering IoT in the
learning process.
The significant differences reported by Saudi
teachers can be attributed to the widespread of
computer technology and the high knowledge of
Science teachers when compared with the teachers of
other subjects. Science teachers are exposed to a
wide range of information during their study for the
skills and expertise required for incorporating IoT
technology. Yet, this board knowledge helps to
organize valid teaching plans and solve any problem
they face. Their broad knowledge and high culture of
modern technologies may be the reason for their
proficiency. Despite the ease of access to these
technologies, some educational platforms have
provided many technologies and applications that
help teachers improve the quality of the teaching
process. They also help students learn using modern
technologies that develop a challenging spirit,
excitement, and competition among students, which
promotes self-confidence and contributes to
improving the educational process, as some studies
have indicated, [22], [23], [32].
Regarding newly hired teachers, it is noticeable
that the requirements of the rapidly advancing era we
live in have necessitated the acquisition of high
experience and skills in using IoT. They have
accumulated skills that enable them to perform the
required educational competencies and teaching
skills more than teachers with longer service. This
has enabled them to easily access the latest software
and device versions connected to the internet network
in order to employ them in the educational process
and improve the quality of learning outcomes.
Additionally, newly hired teachers have motivation,
enthusiasm, and creative ideas on how to manage the
educational process more than teachers with longer
service who are accustomed to traditional methods
and do not deviate from convention in teaching. This
has been indicated in some studies, [35], [36].
Teachers who trained in more than seven training
technical courses show a significant positive impact
on their ability to effectively utilize IoT technologies
in the educational process. The training and
preparation they receive equip them with the
necessary skills and knowledge to overcome
challenges and employ these technologies optimally.
This, in turn, leads to improved student performance.
The value of training courses in enhancing teaching
performance and providing a clear vision for teachers
is widely recognized, as supported by previous
studies, . In-service training enables teachers to
acquire new skills and experiences that positively
influence students, reshape their attitudes, boost
morale, increase productivity, and align with the
demands of modern education. Additionally,
teachers' awareness of advancements in IoT fosters a
sense of belonging and importance within their
educational institutions, further enhancing the
development of learning outcomes.
6 Conclusions and Recommendations
IoT technologies have become necessary and even
essential in contemporary life, especially in the field
of education. These technologies require flexible
infrastructure and wireless communication networks.
On the other hand, we must take into account the
challenges facing the employment of IoT and try to
overcome them. The study recommends the
implementation of IoT technologies and conducting
more studies on standardizing and preparing IoT for
different educational materials and for all educational
levels. It also recommends undertaking more studies
that examine the relationship between educational
services and IoT technologies, raising awareness of
the importance of IoT in developing this process, and
developing and processing automated systems for
managing education through IoT. The study also
recommends the importance of providing a suitable
technological environment for IoT in education,
providing specialists to provide appropriate technical
support, studying the sources of concern that threaten
the investment of IoT technologies in the educational
process, and trying to find solutions to them by
allocating more discussion sessions and specialized
seminars on the subject of IoT services to discover
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
439
Volume 12, 2024
more promising opportunities, deal with difficulties
that hinder working with IoT, and benefit from the
experiences of advanced countries that have used IoT
in the field of education.
7 Limitations
Human Limitations: The teachers (male and
female) in schools of the KSA affiliated with the
Ministry of Education in Riyadh region.
Temporal Limitations: This study was conducted
during the school year 2022- 2023.
Spatial Limitations: The government schools in
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the city of Riyadh.
Subjective Limitations: This study is focused for
the significance of using the Internet of Things in
education from teacher’s perspective and
addressing the challenges during its implementation
in the educational process.
References:
[1] Ventures, S. The importance of online
reputation management for businesses,
[Online].
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/importance-
online-reputation-management-businesses-
stanventures-i4sac/ (Accessed Date: October
25, 2023).
[2] Shanzhi Chen, Hui Xu, Dake Liu, Bo Hu, &
Hucheng Wang. A Vision of IoT: Applications,
challenges, and opportunities with China
perspective. IEEE Internet of Things Journal,
Vol. 1, No. 4, 2014, pp. 349–359.
https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2014.2337336.
[3] Mills, M. The future of the education system
lies in the Internet of Things. Datafioq,
[Online]. https://datafloq.com/read/future-
education-system-internet-of-
things/#google_vignette (Accessed Date:
October 25, 2023).
[4] Shahrestani, S. Assistive IOT and smart
environments: performance requirements.
Internet of Things and Smart Environments,
Vol. 12, No. 4, 2017, pp. 97-117.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60164-9_6.
[5] Alalouny, S. The employing the internet of
things in Saudi universities from the point of
view of faculty members: Opportunities and
Challenges. Educational Journal, Vol. 3, No.
93, 2022, pp. 41-72.
https://doi.org/10.21608/edusohag.2022.21234
7.
[6] Qamar, R. & Zardari, B. A Study of
Blockchain-Based Internet of Things, Iraqi
Journal For Computer Science and
Mathematics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2022, pp. 15-23.
https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2023.01.01.003.
[7] Khan, M. & Salah, K. IoT Security: Review,
Blockchain Solutions, and Open
Challenges. Future Generation Computer
Systems, Vol. 82, No. 3, 2018, pp. 395–411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022.
[8] Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M.,
Aledhari, M. & Ayyash, M. Internet of things:
A survey on enabling technologies, protocols,
and applications. IEEE Communications
Surveys, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2023, pp. 2347-2376.
doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.
[9] Cata, M. Smart university, a new concept in the
internet of things, 20215 14th RoEduNet
International Conference- Networking in
Education and Research (RoEduNet NER),
Craiove, Romania, September 24-26, 2015, pp.
195-197. doi:
10.1109/RoEduNet.2015.7311993.
[10] Stoyanova, M., Nikoloudakis, Y.,
Panagiotakis, S., Pallis, E., & Markakis, E. K.
A Survey on the Internet of Things (IoT)
Forensics: Challenges, Approaches and Open
Issues. IEEE Communications Surveys &
Tutorials, Vol.22, No. 2, 2020, pp. 1191–1221.
https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2962586.
[11] Sergey, L. 5 IoT solutions for modifying
school and college learning processes. IoT Now
News How to Run an IoT Enabled Business,
[Online]. https://www.iot-
now.com/2019/10/24/99568-5-iot-solutions-
modifying-school-college-learning-processes/
(Accessed Date: October 25, 2023).
[12] Rasheed, N., & Tashtoush, M. The impact of
cognitive training program for children (CTPC)
to development the mathematical conceptual
and achievement. Journal of Higher Education
Theory and Practice, Vol. 23, No. 10, 2023,
pp. 218-234.
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i10.6196.
[13] Magdalena, W. Internet of Things- potential
for libraries. Library Hi Tech, Vol. 34, No. 2,
2016, pp. 404-420.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2015-0100.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
440
Volume 12, 2024
[14] Al-Hakeem, S. & Al-Hamami, H.
Implementation of common secure framework
for Internet of Things based Arduino platform.
International Journal of Computer Trends and
Technology (IJCTT), Vol 32, No. 1, 2016, pp.
49-53. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/ijctt-
v32p109.
[15] Xie, K., Liu, Z., Fu, L., & Liang, B. Internet of
Things-based intelligent evacuation protocol in
libraries. Library Hi Tech, Vol. 38, No. 1,
2019, pp. 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-
11-2017-0250.
[16] Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M., Alali, R., & Saleh,
S. Artificial Intelligence in Education:
Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives, Practices
and Challenges. Iraqi Journal for Computer
Science and Mathematics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024,
pp. 60-77.
https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.01.004.
[17] Shorman, S. Internet of Things Application to
Development of Smart Classroom System.
International Review on Computers and
Software, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2019, pp. 22-31.
https://doi.org/10.15866/irecos.v14i1.17374.
[18] Hussein, A., Barhamgi, M., Vecchio, M.,
Perera, C. Crowdsourced Peer Learning
Activity for Internet of Things Education: A
Case Study, IEEE Internet of Things Magazine,
Vol. 2, No. 3, 2019, pp. 26-31.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.0001.1900040.
[19] Shaikh, H., Khan, M., Maher, Z., Anwar, M.,
Raza, A. & Shah, A. Conceptual Framework
for Determining Acceptance of Internet Things
(IOT) in Higher Education Institutions of
Pakistan. International Conference on
Information Science and Communication
Technology (ICISCT), Karachi, Pakistan, Vol
9, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cisct.2019.8777431.
[20] Nagowah, S. D., Ben Sta, H., & Gobin-
Rahimbux, B. A systematic literature review
on semantic models for IoT-enabled smart
campus. Applied Ontology, Vol 16, No. 1,
2021, pp. 27-53. https://doi.org/10.3233/ao-
200240.
[21] Stankovic, A. (2014). Research directions for
the internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things
Journal, Vol 1, No. 1, 2014, pp. 3-9.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2312291.
[22] Dhanvijay, M., & Patil, S. Internet of Things:
A survey of enabling technologies in
healthcare and its applications. Computer
Networks, Vol 153, No. 1, 2019, pp. 113-131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.03.006.
[23] Tashtoush, M., Wardat, Y., AlAli, R., & Al-
Saud, K. The impact of cyberbullying on
student motivation to learn: Insights from Abu
Dhabi Emirate schools. Humanities and Social
Sciences Letters, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2023, pp. 461-
474. https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v11i4.3566.
[24] Kanuru, S., & Priyaadharshini, M. . Lifelong
learning in higher education using learning
analytics. Procedia Computer Science, Vol.
172, No. 2020, 2020, pp. 848-852.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.122.
[25] Rahman, M & Asyhari, A. The emergence of
IoT: Connecting anything, anywhere.
Computers. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1-4,
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers8020040.
[26] Asad, M., Naz, A., Shaikh, A., Alrizq, M.,
Akram, M., Alghamdi, A. Investigating the
impact of IoT-Based smart laboratories on
students’ academic performance in higher
education. Univ. Access Inf. Soc., 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00944-1.
[27] Mershad, K, & Wakim, P. A learning
management system enhanced with Internet of
things applications. Journal of Education and
Learning, Vol 7, No. 27, 2018, pp. 23-40.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n3p23.
[28] Chew, C. Sensors-enabled smart attendance
systems using NFC and RFID Technologies,
International Journal of New Computer
Architectures and their Applications, Vol 5,
No. 1, 2015, pp. 19-28.
https://doi.org/10.17781/p001645
[29] Wojcik, M. Internet of Things potential for
libraries. Emerald Group Publishing Limited,
Vol 34, No. 2, 2016, pp. 404-
420. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2015-
0100.
[30] Shrinath S. Pai, Vikhyath, Shivani, Sanket,
Shruti. IoT application in education.
International Journal for Advance Research
and Development, Vol 2, No. 6, 2017, pp. 20-
24, [Online].
https://www.ijarnd.com/manuscript/iot-
application-in-education/ (Accessed Date:
October 25, 2023).
[31] Altayari, M. & Almohammadi, N. The
effectiveness of internet of things applications
in a personal learning environment in
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
441
Volume 12, 2024
developing cognitive achievement in
programming skills for the intermediate school
students in Rabigh Governorate. Journal of
Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, Vol.
2, No. 5, 2023, pp. 91-110.
https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.n281222.
[32] Abbasy, M., & Quesada, E. Predictable
Influence of IoT (Internet of Things) in the
Higher Education. International Journal of
Information and Education Technology, Vol. 7,
No. 12, 2017, pp. 914–920.
https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.12.995.
[33] Gartner Inc. Definition of internet of things
(IoT) Gartner information technology glossary,
[Online].
https://www.gartner.com/en/information-
technology/glossary/internet-of-things
(Accessed Date: October 18, 2023).
[34] Fragou, O., & Mavroudi, A. Exploring Internet
of Things, Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous
Computing in Computer Science Education: A
Systematic Mapping Study. International
Journal of Technology in Education and
Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, pp. 72-85.
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.47.
[35] Baraa I. & Jasim, A. A Survey of Intrusion
Detection Using Deep Learning in Internet of
Things, Iraqi Journal For Computer Science
and Mathematics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2022, pp. 83-
93.
https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2022.01.01.009.
[36] Karthika, E., & Mohanapriya, S.. Real time
behavior based service specific secure routing
for cloud centric IoT systems. Journal of
Ambient Intelligence and Humanized
Computing, Vol. 12, 2021, pp. 4737-4744.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01879-2.
[37] Tashtoush, Y., Al-Refai, M., Al-Refai, G.
Zaghal, N., Darweesh, D., & Darwish, O..
Dynamic traffic light system to reduce the
waiting time of emergency vehicles at
intersections within IoT environment.
International Journal of Computers
Communications & Control, Vol. 17, No. 3,
2022, Article ID 4482.
https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2022.3.4482.
[38] Tashtoush, Y., Darweesh, D., Husari, G.,
Darwish, D., Darwish, Y., Issa, L., & Ashqar,
H.. Agile Approaches for Cybersecurity
Systems, IoT and Intelligent Transportation.
IEEE Access. Vol. 10, 2021, pp. 1360-1375.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.313686
1.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed to the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Source of funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_
US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
Faisal Aloufi, Mohammad A. Tashtoush,
Nawal Shirawia, Rami A. Tashtoush, Emad A. Az-Zo’Bi
E-ISSN: 2415-1521
442
Volume 12, 2024