Wide-Sense Nonblocking Multicast in WDM Optical Linear Array and
Ring Networks with 3-Length Extension
M. SABRIGIRIRAJ1 K. MANOHARAN2 R. KARTHIK3,
1Department of ECE, SVS College of Engineering, Coimbatore, 642 109, Tamilnadu, INDIA
2Department of ECE, SNS College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641 035, Tamilnadu, INDIA.
3Department of CSE, Sri Krishna College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641042, Tamilnadu, INDIA.
Abstract: - The modern scientific growths in optical networks based on wavelength division multiplexing
(WDM) are more attractive to satisfy the high bandwidth requirements of the modern internet infrastructure.
Moreover, they have immense potential to satisfy the future bandwidth requirements.WDM optical networks
act as the backbone for telecommunication and high-performance communication networks. Multicast
communication is the simultaneous transmission of data from one source node to many destination nodes
available in the network and can be implemented efficiently over a WDM optical network. It is extensively
deployed in high performance computing and communication networks. In this article, a linear array and ring
networks are extended by directly linking all nodes which are separated by two intermediate nodes with
additional fibers which is referred as linear array and ring network with 3-length extension. The necessary and
sufficient condition on the minimum wavelength number along with wavelength allotment methods are
proposed to realize one-to-many communication over such a WDM optical linear array and ring with 3-length
extension under longest link first routing techniques.
Key-Words: -Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM), Multicast, WDM Optical Network, Wavelength
Assignment, Longest Link First Routing
Received: September 15, 2021. Revised: May 12, 2022. Accepted: June 7, 2022. Published: July 5, 2022.
1 Introduction
The modern scientific growths in optical
networks based on wavelength division
multiplexing (WDM) are more attractive to satisfy
the high bandwidth requirements of the modern
internet infrastructure. Moreover, they have
unlimited potential to satisfy the future bandwidth
requirements. WDM optical networks act as the
backbone for telecommunication and high-
performance communication networks. An optical
network is a most commonly and widely employed
communication system that uses light signals to
transmit information between two or more points.
Optical networks are based on optical technologies
and components, and are used to route, groom, and
restore wavelength levels and wavelength-based
services
Multicast communication is the concurrent
transmission of data from one source node to many
destination nodes. It is widely deployed in high
performance computing and communication
networks. Multicast assignment is a well-defined
type of multicast communication and is used in this
study. Multicast assignment involves establishing
connections between various nodes of a network in
such a way that each destination node should be
connected to only one source node, whereas each
source node may be connected to one or more
destination nodes. All forms of multicast
communication can easily be broken down into
multiple multicast assignments. Due to the absence
of optical buffering at the optical nodes, it is
preferred to have a nonblocking network.
Otherwise, data would be lost with blocked
connections. An optical network can be termed as
nonblocking, if it is possible to establish all the
connections of the given multicast communication
without removing or rerouting any of the existing
connections. Such networks are said to be wide-
sense nonblocking [1-6], if the connections are
established by a definite routing algorithm.
Wide-sense nonblocking multicast is
studied in electronic switching networks [2] and
network topologies namely linear array, ring, torus,
mesh and hypercube [1].Wide-sense nonblocking
multicast and strict-sense nonblocking multicast is
studied for clos networks [5] and elastic optical
switch [6]. Multicast communication is alsostudied
for various optical networks namely clos
network,benes network, elastic optical networks and
for general network topologies [3-4,712].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS
DOI: 10.37394/23205.2022.21.32
M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik
E-ISSN: 2224-2872
263
Volume 21, 2022
Linear array [13-17] and ring networks [18-
22] are the basic network topologies suitable for
interconnection networks and for LAN and
WAN.The linear array and ring networks are widely
adopted for LAN, MAN and WAN and also used
ininterconnection networks due to its regularity and
small node degree. The wide-sense nonblocking
multicast communication[23-33] in WDM networks
such as linear array with 3-length extension and
unidirectional ring with 3-length extension and
bidirectional ring with 3-length extension networks
are already studied under longest link first routing.
Particularly, the most important attention is over the
determination of the necessary and sufficient
condition over the minimum wavelength number
needed for the network to be wide sense
nonblocking. Explicit wavelength allotment
techniques are also proposed for each of the network
topologies. The results obtained in this paper can be
applied for practical long-haul networks like mesh
network, since mesh network can be decomposed
into multiple linear array and/or ring networks.
In Section 2, the preliminaries needed to
analyse wide-sense nonblocking multicast problem
in linear array, unidirectional ring and bidirectional
ring networks with 3-length extension under longest
link first routing is discussed. In Section 3, the
necessary and sufficient condition on the minimum
wavelength number required to realize wide-sense
nonblocking multicast under longest link first
routing is derived and explicit wavelength allotment
techniques are given. Section 4, discusses the result
obtained for the 3-length extension networks.
Finally, section 5, the inference of this paper is
presented highlighting future research direction.
2 Preliminaries
Figure 1 shows a 10-node basic linear array
network. Figure 2 shows 16-node linear array
network with 3-length extension. A linear array
network with 3-length extension is obtained by
additionally connecting all such nodes which are
separated by two consecutive intermediate nodes of
the linear array. Each node in the linear array is
additionally connected to the node which is placed
after 2 nodes away from it. At each node x, data can
move from node to node x+1 and from node x
directly to node if such nodes exist and also
vice-versa.
Figure 1. A 10-node basic linear array
Figure 2. A 16-node linear array with 3-length
extension
Figure 3 shows a 12-node basic ring
network. Figure 4 shows a 12-node ring network
with 3-length extension. A ring network with 3-
length extension is obtained by additionally
connecting each of the nodes with another node
which is 2 nodes away from it in a basic ring. That
is, each node in the ring is additionally connected to
a node which is placed at the distance of 3 nodes
away from it. At each node, data can directly move
from node x to node and also directly from
node x directly to node where indicates
modulo addition of N.
Figure 3. A-12 node basic ring
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS
DOI: 10.37394/23205.2022.21.32
M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik
E-ISSN: 2224-2872
264
Volume 21, 2022
Figure 4. A-12 node ring with 3-length extension
Definition 1: A link that joins two nodes and
(where denotes󰇛 󰇜 mod) is called a
shorter link. A link that joins two nodes and 
 (where denotes mod N) is called a
longer link.
For example, in Figure 2, the link that joins node 0
with node 1 is a shorter link. Similarly, the link that
joins node 0 with node 3 directly (without passing
through intermediate nodes1 and 2) is a longer link.
Definition 2: A lightpath (or optical connection) is
characterized as the arrangement of all the links that
joins source node with destination node under an
endorsed routing technique. A connection (u, v)
corresponds to a transmission of a data packet from
source node u to destination node v through a
lightpath.
Definition 3: A lightpath that chooses the longest
link among all the accessible links at the source
node and at each of the intermediate nodes to reach
the destination node is said to follow as ‘longest link
first routing’.
For example, in Figure 4, under longest link first
algorithm, a connection from node 0 to node 7
selects the links joining the node 0 with node 3, then
node 3 with node 6, and node 6 with node 7.
3. Main Results
Wavelengths are costly resources in an
optical network. The number of different
wavelengths employed in a network increases the
cost of the network besides complexity of the
network. So, it is preferable to limit the usage of
distinct wavelengths. The sufficient and necessary
condition on the minimum wavelength number
required for the network to be wide-sense
nonblocking is derived for linear array,
unidirectional ring and bidirectional ring networks
with 3-length extension under longest link first
routing technique.
3.1. Linear array with 3-length extension
Figure 2 shows a 16-node linear array with 3-length
extension. The routing of lightpaths is either in
rightward direction or in leftward direction.
Lightpaths are built up under longest link first
routing so as to use minimum number of hops for
each connection. Theorem 1 is proved based on this
assumption.
Theorem 1: The sufficient and necessary condition
on the wavelength number for a N node linear array
with 3-length extension to be wide-sense non-
blocking is 
Proof: Sufficiency: It is to be noted that all the
lightpaths between different sources and
destinations are routed either in rightward direction
or in leftward direction. For a lightwave network, a
specific wavelength can be dispensed for numerous
lightpaths as long as they do not overlap with each
other. A wavelength released by a current lightpath
during its termination can be again used to build up
a new lightpath. It can be noted that out of
multicast connections, there can be at most
lightpaths either in rightward direction or in
leftward direction. During a new connection request,
it can be observed that there can be atmost N-4
already existing lightpaths sharing a particular link
in the same direction. To establish the current
connection request, one more lightpath is needed.
So, wavelengths are sufficient to route all
connection requests.
Necessity: Consider a worst-case multicast
assignment of the form with 0 as the source and
every other node as its destinations, alongside
another connection with 0 as the destination for any
arbitrary source. All lightpaths with destination
node index greater than or equal to 3 utilize the link
joining nodes 0 with 3. The aggregate number of
such lightpaths iswhich necessitates
wavelengths. The remaining lightpaths namely (0,
1), (0, 2) and (x, 0) where x {1, 2,…,N 1} do
not share any link in the same direction with the
previous set of lightpaths and can be built up
utilizing any of the already allotted wavelengths.
Henceforth, the wavelength number requirement
is. Consequently, wavelengths are the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS
DOI: 10.37394/23205.2022.21.32
M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik
E-ISSN: 2224-2872
265
Volume 21, 2022
sufficient and necessary condition on the
wavelength number.
Wavelength allotment technique
In this technique, four tables namely for
rightward connections and  for leftward
connections are used for managing wavelength
allotment. Let contain all available
wavelengths namely Let the
tables and  be initially empty.
Let and be the index of source and destination
node respectively. Then, the wavelength allotment
procedure for a new connection request (x, y) is as
follows:
Step 1: If allot a wavelength that
is not available in  but available in . Then
include this wavelength in TR1. Else if
allot the wavelengththat is not available in  but
available in . Then include this wavelength in
TR2.
Step 2: If  allot a wavelength that
is not available in  but available in . Then
include this wavelength in TL1. Else if
allot the wavelength that is not available in  but
available in .Then include this wavelength in
TL2.
3.2. Unidirectional ring with 3-length extension
Figure 4 shows a 12-node ring with 3-length
extension. The routing of lightpaths is assumed to
be in clockwise direction without loss of generality.
Lightpaths are established under longest link first
routing to use minimum number of hops. Theorem
2 is proved based on this assumption.
Theorem 2: The sufficient and necessary condition
on the wavelength number for an N node
unidirectional ring with 3-length extension to be
wide-sense non-blocking is .
Proof:
Sufficiency: It is to be noted that all the lightpaths
between various sources and destinations are routed
only in clockwise direction. For a lightwave
network, a particular wavelength can be allotted for
multiple lightpaths as long as they do not overlap
with one another. A wavelength released by a
current lightpath during its termination can be again
used to allot for a new lightpath establishment. It
can be noted that out of multicast lightpaths, there
can be at most lightpaths originating from
the same source. During a new connection request,
it can be observed that there can be atmost N-4
already existing lightpaths sharing a particular link
in the same direction. To establish the current
connection request, one more lightpath is needed.
So, wavelengths are sufficient to route all
connection requests.
Necessity: It is not hard to note that a worst-case
multicast assignment can be of the form with 0 as
the source and all other nodes are its destinations
along with another lightpath with 0 as destination
for an arbitrary source. All lightpaths with source
index 0 and destination index greater than 2 use the
longer link joining nodes 0 with 3. The total number
of such lightpaths is . The remaining lightpaths
namely (0, 1), (0,2)and (x, 0) where x {1, 2, . . .,
N 1} do not share any link with the previous N-3
lightpaths and can utilize any three wavelengths
from the wavelengths assigned for previousN-3
lightpaths. Hence, the wavelength number
requirement is. Therefore, wavelengths
are the sufficient and necessary condition on the
wavelength number.
Wavelength allotment technique
In this technique, two tables namely and are
used for managing wavelength allotment to light-
paths setup in clockwise direction. Letbe used for
storing the available wavelengths
namely.
Let x and y be the index of source and destination
node respectively. Then, the wavelength allotment
procedure for a new connection request (x, y) is as
follows:
Step 1: If   allot a wavelength that
is not available in  but available in . Then
include this wavelength in Tc1. Else if
allot the wavelength that is not available in  but
available in . Then include this wavelength in
Tc2.
Step 2: If  allot a wavelength that
is not available in  but available in . Then
include this wavelength in Tc1. Else if
allot the wavelength that is not available in  but
available in . Then include this wavelength in
Tc2.
3.3 Bidirectional ring with 3-length extension
Figure 4 shows a12-node ring with 3-length
extension. The routing of lightpaths is assumed to
be in shortest path direction. If the length of the
lightpath is same in both clockwise and
anticlockwise direction, then clockwise direction is
always followed. Lightpaths are established under
longest link first routing to use minimum number of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS
DOI: 10.37394/23205.2022.21.32
M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik
E-ISSN: 2224-2872
266
Volume 21, 2022
hops. Theorem 3 is proved based on this
assumption.
Theorem 3: The sufficient and necessary condition
on the wavelength number for a N node
bidirectional ring with 3-length extension to be
wide-sense non-blocking is󰇵
󰇶.
Proof:
Sufficiency: All the lightpaths between various
sources and destinations are routed only in the
shortest path direction. If the length of lightpath is
same in both clockwise and anticlockwise direction,
then clockwise direction is always followed. For a
lightwave network, a particular wavelength can be
allotted for multiple lightpaths as long as they do
not overlap with one another. A wavelength released
by a current lightpath during its termination can be
again used to allot for a new lightpath
establishment. During a new connection request, it
can be observed that there can be atmost
󰇵
󰇶 already existing lightpaths sharing a particular
link in the same direction. To establish the current
connection request, one more lightpath is needed.
So, 󰇵
󰇶 wavelengths are sufficient to route all
connection requests.
Necessity:
Case i: N is even: Consider a worst-case multicast
assignment of the form󰇛 󰇜  .
The first group of lightpaths of the form 󰇛 󰇜
share the longer link joining the nodes x
and and hence each lightpath need to be
assigned a unique wavelength. This necessitates

wavelengths. The other group of lightpaths
namely 󰇛 󰇜 and 󰇛 󰇜 does not share
any link with any of the lightpaths of the previous
group. Therefore, these two lightpaths can be
assigned any two wavelengths from the wavelengths
assigned from the first group.
Hence,
wavelengths are required to route all the
lightpaths of multicast assignment, if N is even.
Case ii: N is odd: Consider a worst-case multicast
assignment of the form󰇛 󰇜  󰇛
󰇜. The first group of lightpaths of the form
󰇛 󰇜 
share the longer link
joining the nodes x and and hence each
lightpath need to be assigned a unique wavelength.
This necessitates 
wavelengths. The other group
of lightpaths namely 󰇛 󰇜 and 󰇛 󰇜
does not share any link with any of the lightpaths of
the previous group. Therefore, these two lightpaths
can be assigned any two wavelengths from the
wavelengths assigned from the first group.
Hence,
wavelengths are required to route all the
lightpaths of multicast assignment, if N is odd.
Hence,󰇵
󰇶 wavelengths are necessary to route all
multicast lightpaths irrespective of whether is
even or odd.
Wavelength allotment technique
Let x and y be the index of source and destination
node respectively. Then, the wavelength allotment
procedure for any connection request (x, y) is based
on the index of the destination node which is
mapped to a particular wavelength. The destination
node index to wavelength index mapping is as given
in table 1.
Table 1 The destination node index to wavelength
index mapping.
Destination node index
Wavelength to be
assigned
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
0
1
2
3
N-1
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS
DOI: 10.37394/23205.2022.21.32
M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik
E-ISSN: 2224-2872
267
Volume 21, 2022
4. Results and Discussion
Table 2 shows the comparison between basic
network topologies and network topologies with 3-
length extension in terms of the number of
wavelengths required to support wide-sense
nonblocking multicast communication. The results
were obtained in the previous section for network
topologies with 3-length extension. From Table 2, it
can be observed that the wavelength number needed
to support wide-sense nonblocking multicast is
marginally reduced for linear array, unidirectional
ring and bi-directional ring with 3-length extensions
when compared with their basic counterpart.
Table 2 Comparison of wavelength requirement for
achieving wide-sense nonblocking multicast
between basic network topologies and network
topologies with 2-length and 3-length extension
Network
Topology
Networks
with 2-
length
extension
under
longest
link first
routing
[4]
Networks
with 3-
length
extension
under
longest
link first
routing
N-node
Linear Array
N-2
N-3
N-node
Unidirectional
ring
N-2
N-3
N-node
Bi-directional
ring
5. Conclusion and future work
In this paper, wide-sense nonblocking
multicast communication is studied for WDM
optical linear array, unidirectional ring and bi-
directional ring with 3-length extensions under
longest link first routing. The sufficient and
necessary condition on the minimum wavelength
number needed for the network to be wide-sense
nonblocking is derived for each of the above
network topologies. The results found in this work
are then compared with their corresponding basic
network topologies. The wavelength number needed
to support wide-sense nonblocking multicast is
marginally reduced for linear array, unidirectional
ring and bi-directional ring with 3-length extensions
when compared with their basic counterpart.
Future work includes extending this study of
wide-sense nonblocking multicast communication
for WDM optical linear array and unidirectional and
bidirectional ring with 4-length and higher length
extensions.
References
[1] Zhou, C., Yang, Y.:Wide-sense nonblocking
multicast in a class of regular optical WDM
networks. IEEE Trans. Comm. 50, 126134
(2002)
[2] Zheng, S.Q.: An optimal wide-sense
nonblocking distributor. IEEE Trans. Comput.
59, 17091714 (2010)
[3] Ma, L., Wuc, B., Jiang, X., Pattavina, A.:
Nonblocking conditions for (f1, f2)cast Clos
networks under balanced traffic.Opt. Switch.
Netw. 25, 109116 (2017)
[4] M. Sabrigiriraj, and R. Karthik, "Wide-sense
nonblocking multicast in optical WDM
networks", Cluster Computing, pp.1-6, 2017.
[5] M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik,
"Wide-Sense Nonblocking Multicast in WDM
Optical Linear Array and Ring Networks with
2-Length Extension under Index Based
Routing," WSEAS Transactions on
Communications, vol. 21, pp. 181-188, 2022
[6] Kabacinski, W., Michalski, M., Abdulsahib,
M.: Wide-sense nonblocking elastic optical
switch. Opt. Switch. Netw. 25, 7179(2017)
[7] Ge, M., Ye, T., Lee, T.T., Weisheng, H.:
Multicast routing and wavelength assignment
in AWG-based clos networks.
IEEE/ACMTrans. Netw. 25, 18921909 (2017)
[8] Zhu, Z., Liu, X., YixiangWangWei, L., Gong,
L., Shui, Y., Ansari, N.: Impairment- and
splitting-aware cloud-ready multicast
provisioning in elastic optical networks.
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 25, 12201234
(2017)
[9] Vinolee, R., Vidhyacharan, B., Ramachandran,
B.: Conversion complexity of multicast routing
and wavelength assignment converters with
different wavelength conversion in Benes
network.Wirel. Pers. Commun. 86, 477496
(2016)
[10] Panayiotou, T., Ellinas, G., Antoniades, N.,
Hadjiantonis, A.: Impairment-aware multicast
session provisioning in metro opticalnetworks.
Comput. Netw. 91, 675688 (2015)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS
DOI: 10.37394/23205.2022.21.32
M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik
E-ISSN: 2224-2872
268
Volume 21, 2022
[11] Samadi, P., Gupta,V., Junjie,X.,Wang, H.,
Zussman, G., Bergman, K.:Optical multicast
system for data center networks. Opt. Express
23, 2216222180 (2015)
[12] Guo, Z., Yang, Y.: High-speed multicast
scheduling in hybrid optical packet switches
with guaranteed latency. IEEE Trans. Comput.
62, 19721987 (2013)
[13] M. Sabrigiriraj, M. Meenakshi and R.
Roopkumar, “Wavelength assignment in WDM
linear array”, Electronics Letters, Vol.43,
pp.1111-1113, 2007.
[14] M.Sabrigiriraj, M.Meenakshi and
R.Roopkumar, “Wavelength assignment for all-
to-all broadcast in WDM optical linear array
with limited drops”, Computer
Communications, Vol. 33, pp. 1804-1808,
2009.
[15] M.Sabrigiriraj and M.Meenakshi, “All-to-all
broadcast in optical WDM networks under
light-tree model”, Computer Communications,
Vol.31, pp.2562-2565, 2008.
[16] M. Sabrigiriraj, & K. Manoharan, “Wavelength
Allotment for All-to-All Broadcast in WDM
Optical Modified Linear Array for Reliable
Communication”, Journal of Mobile Networks
and Applications, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp 350356,
2019.
[17] M. Sabrigiriraj, & K. Manoharan, All-to-All
Broadcast in WDM Linear Array with 3-length
Extension”, WSEAS Transactions on Circuits
and System, Vol. 21, pp 74-93, 2022.
[18] M. Sabrigiriraj, & K. Manoharan, “Wavelength
allocation for all-to-all broadcast in
bidirectional optical WDM modified ring”,
Journal of Optik, Vol. 179, pp.545-556, 2019.
[19] M. Sabrigiriraj, & K. Manoharan, “Wavelength
Allotment for All-to-All Broadcast in WDM
Optical Bidirectional ring with 3-Length
Extension”, WSEAS Transactions on
Computers, Vol. 20, pp 139-157, 2022.
[20] M. Sabrigiriraj, & K. Manoharan, “All-to-All
Broadcast in optical WDM ring with 2-length
extension and 3-length extension”, WSEAS
Transactions on Communications, Vol. 21, pp
135-154, 2022.
[21] V.S.Shekhawat, D.K.Tyagi and V.K. Chaubey,
“Design and characterization of a modified
WDM ring network An analytical approach”,
Optik, Vol.123, pp.1103-1107, 2012.
[22] S.Sen, R.Vikas, V.K.Chaubey, “Designing and
simulation of a modified WDM ring network
with improved grade of service”, Optical Fiber
Technology, Vol. 11, pp. 266-277, 2005.
[23] W. Liang and X. Shen, “A general approach for
all-to-all routing in multihop WDM optical
networks”, IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking,
Vol. 14, pp. 914-923, 2006.
[24] Chen, M.T., Lin, B.M. & Tseng, S.S., 2008,
‘Multicast routing and wavelength assignment
with delay constraints in WDM networks with
heterogeneous capabilities’, Journal of Network
and Computer Applications, vol. 31, no. 1,
pp.47-65.
[25] Hamad, A.M. & Kamal, A.E., 2002, ‘A survey
of multicasting protocols for broadcast-and-
select single-hop networks’, IEEE network,
vol. 16, no. 4, pp.36-48.
[26] Huang, X., Farahmand, F. & Jue, J.P., 2005,
Multicast traffic grooming in wavelength-
routed WDM mesh networks using
dynamically changing light-trees’, Journal of
Lightwave Technology, vol. 23, no. 10,
pp.3178-3187.
[27] Jeong, M., Xiong, Y., Cankaya, H.C. &
Vandenhoute, M., 2003, ‘Tree-shared multicast
in optical burst-switched WDM networks’,
Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 21, no.
1, pp.13.
[28] Kanrar, S. & Siraj, M., 2010, ‘Performance of
Multirate Multicast in Distributed Network’,
International Journal of Communications,
Network and System Sciences, vol. 3, no. 06,
pp.554.
[29] Kirci, P. & Zaim, A.H., 2014, ‘WDM network
and multicasting protocol strategies’, The
Scientific World Journal.
[30] Kirci, P. & Zaim, A.H., 2014, ‘WDM network
and multicasting protocol strategies’, The
Scientific World Journal.
[31] Lai, C.P. & Bergman, K., 2012, ‘Broadband
multicasting for wavelength-striped optical
packets’, Journal of Lightwave Technology,
vol. 30, no. 11, pp.1706-1718.
[32] Liu, H., Dai, H., Zhai, F., Chen, Y. & Wei, C.,
2015, ‘Longest path reroute to optimize the
optical multicast routing in sparse splitting
WDM networks’, International Journal of
Optics, 2015.
[33] Liu, H., Shen, Q. & Chen, Y., 2014, ‘An
optical multicast routing with minimal network
coding operations in WDM networks’,
International Journal of Optics.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS
DOI: 10.37394/23205.2022.21.32
M. Sabrigiriraj, K. Manoharan, R. Karthik
E-ISSN: 2224-2872
269
Volume 21, 2022