<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="4.4.0"><head><doi_batch_id>7325068d-dfcc-4914-9f3f-ad816ff1cf70</doi_batch_id><timestamp>20211123091913950</timestamp><depositor><depositor_name>wseas:wseas</depositor_name><email_address>mdt@crossref.org</email_address></depositor><registrant>MDT Deposit</registrant></head><body><journal><journal_metadata language="en"><full_title>WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS</full_title><issn media_type="electronic">2224-2872</issn><issn media_type="print">1109-2750</issn><archive_locations><archive name="Portico"/></archive_locations><doi_data><doi>10.37394/23205</doi><resource>http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=4026</resource></doi_data></journal_metadata><journal_issue><publication_date media_type="online"><month>3</month><day>2</day><year>2021</year></publication_date><publication_date media_type="print"><month>3</month><day>2</day><year>2021</year></publication_date><journal_volume><volume>20</volume><doi_data><doi>10.37394/23205.2021.20</doi><resource>https://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=23297</resource></doi_data></journal_volume></journal_issue><journal_article language="en"><titles><title>Set-Based Concurrent Engineering Process Model and Systematic Application on an Electronic Card Reader</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Ahmed</given_name><surname>Al-Ashaab</surname><affiliation>Department of Manufacturing Cranfield University College Road, Bedford, MK43 0AH UNITED KINGDOM</affiliation></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Zehra Canan</given_name><surname>Araci</surname><affiliation>Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management University of Sharjah 27272, Sharjah UNITED ARAB EMIRATES</affiliation></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Muhd Ikmal I.</given_name><surname>Mohd Maulana</surname><affiliation>Department of Manufacturing Cranfield University College Road, Bedford, MK43 0AH UNITED KINGDOM</affiliation></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Cesar Garcia</given_name><surname>Almeida</surname><affiliation>Department of Manufacturing Cranfield University College Road, Bedford, MK43 0AH UNITED KINGDOM</affiliation></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Steve</given_name><surname>Young</surname><affiliation>Department of Manufacturing Cranfield University College Road, Bedford, MK43 0AH UNITED KINGDOM</affiliation></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1"><jats:p>Set-based concurrent engineering (SBCE), also known as set-based design, is a state-of-the-art approach to the new product development process. SBCE, simply, provides an environment where designers explore a wide range of alternative solutions in the early stages of product development. After gaining knowledge, solutions are narrowed down until the optimal solution is ensured. Such an environment saves considerable amount of cost and time while reaching innovation and high quality in the products. However, industrial practitioners seek a clear and systematic application throughout an SBCE process. This paper demonstrates a well-structured SBCE process model and its step-by-step application on a product called “electronic card reader”. Real data is used in the industrial case study. Results showed the benefits of applying SBCE in both the product, and the process of new product development.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="online"><month>11</month><day>23</day><year>2021</year></publication_date><publication_date media_type="print"><month>11</month><day>23</day><year>2021</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>329</first_page><last_page>351</last_page></pages><publisher_item><item_number item_number_type="article_number">36</item_number></publisher_item><ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators"><ai:free_to_read start_date="2021-11-23"/><ai:license_ref applies_to="am" start_date="2021-11-23">https://wseas.com/journals/computers/2021/a725105-033(2021).pdf</ai:license_ref></ai:program><archive_locations><archive name="Portico"/></archive_locations><doi_data><doi>10.37394/23205.2021.20.36</doi><resource>https://wseas.com/journals/computers/2021/a725105-033(2021).pdf</resource></doi_data><citation_list><citation key="ref0"><doi>10.1115/1.0002152v</doi><unstructured_citation>Al Handawi, K., Andersson, P., Panarotto, M., Isaksson, O., &amp; Kokkolaras, M. (2021). Scalable SetBased Design Optimization and Remanufacturing for Meeting Changing Requirements. Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047908 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref1"><doi>10.1177/1063293x13495220</doi><unstructured_citation>Al-Ashaab, A., Golob, M., Attia, U. M., Khan, M., Parsons, J., Andino, A., Perez, A., Guzman, P., Onecha, A., Kesavamoorthy, S., Martinez, G., Shehab, E., Berkes, A., Haque, B., Soril, M., &amp; Sopelana, A. (2013). The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering: A case study from an aerospace industry. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X1349 5220 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref2"><doi>10.1080/0951192x.2015.1066858</doi><unstructured_citation>Al-Ashaab, A., Golob, M., Urrutia, U. A., Gourdin, M., Petritsch, C., Summers, M., &amp; El-Nounu, A. (2016). Development and application of lean product development performance measurement tool. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.201 5.1066858 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref3"><doi>10.1177/1063293x19855115</doi><unstructured_citation>Ammar, R., Hammadi, M., Choley, J. Y., Barkallah, M., Louati, J., &amp; Haddar, M. (2019). Narrowing the set of complex systems’ possible design solutions derived from the set-based concurrent engineering approach. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X1985 5115 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref4"><doi>10.1504/ijpd.2008.019240</doi><unstructured_citation>Anand, G., &amp; Kodali, R. (2008). Development of a conceptual framework for lean new product development process. International Journal of Product Development, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2008.019 240 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref5"><doi>10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.028</doi><unstructured_citation>Araci, Z. C., Al-Ashaab, A., Lasisz, P. W., Flisiak, J. W., Maulana, M. I. I. M., Beg, N., &amp; Rehman, A. (2017). Trade-off Curves Applications to Support Set-based Design of a Surface Jet Pump. Procedia CIRP, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.0 1.028 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref6"><doi>10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110509</doi><unstructured_citation>Araci, Z. C., Tariq, M. U., Al-Ashaab, A., Braasch, J. H., &amp; Simsekler, M. C. E. (2020). Creating knowledge environment during lean product development process of jet engine. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020 .0110509 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref7"><unstructured_citation>Araci, Z. C., Al-Ashaab, A., &amp; Maksimovic, M. (2015). A process of generating trade-off curves to enable set-based concurrent engineering. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref8"><doi>10.1080/09544820802459243</doi><unstructured_citation>Avigad, G., &amp; Moshaiov, A. (2010). Set-based concept selection in multiobjective problems involving delayed decisions. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/095448208024 59243 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref9"><unstructured_citation>Bhushan, N., &amp; Rai, K. (2007). Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces, 35(3). </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref10"><doi>10.1108/jedt-07-2019-0170</doi><unstructured_citation>Blindheim, J., Elverum, C. W., Welo, T., &amp; Steinert, M. (2020). Concept evaluation in new product development: A set-based method utilizing rapid prototyping and physical modelling. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT07-2019-0170 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref11"><doi>10.22215/timreview/1331</doi><unstructured_citation>Camarda, C. J., Scotti, S. J., Kunttu, I., &amp; Perttula, A. (2020). Rapid learning and knowledge-gap closure during the conceptual design phase - rapid R&amp;D. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/13 32 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref12"><doi>10.1016/s0923-4748(03)00007-9</doi><unstructured_citation>Cooper, L. P. (2003). A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: A practitioner perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 20(1-2 SPEC.). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923- 4748(03)00007-9 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref13"><doi>10.1504/ijpd.2014.064883</doi><unstructured_citation>Correia, A. T., Stokic, D., &amp; Faltus, S. (2014). Mechanisms for communication and knowledge sharing for set-Based concurrent engineering. International Journal of Product Development, 19(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2014.064 883 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref14"><doi>10.1177/0887302x12472724</doi><unstructured_citation>Curwen, L. G., Park, J., &amp; Sarkar, A. K. (2013). Challenges and Solutions of Sustainable Apparel Product Development: A Case Study of Eileen Fisher. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X1247 2724 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref15"><doi>10.1109/isse46696.2019.8984581</doi><unstructured_citation>Du Manoir Geoffroy, L. C., Shruthi, S., Yan, Z., &amp; Mingze, M. (2019). Architecture and design definition processes: Return of experiment about complementary MBSE tools to model consistent architecture layers and to support design trade-offs through a set based concurrent engineering approach. ISSE 2019 - 5th IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering, Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE46696.201 9.8984581 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref16"><doi>10.1017/dsj.2020.19</doi><unstructured_citation>Eckert, C., Isaksson, O., Lebjioui, S., Earl, C. F., &amp; Edlund, S. (2020). Design margins in industrial practice. Design Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.19 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref17"><doi>10.1177/1063293x16671386</doi><unstructured_citation>Elhariri Essamlali, M. T., Sekhari, A., &amp; Bouras, A. (2017). Product lifecycle management solution for collaborative development of Wearable MetaProducts using set-based concurrent engineering. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X1667 1386 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref18"><doi>10.1016/j.procs.2019.05.052</doi><unstructured_citation>Fitzgerald, M. E., &amp; Ross, A. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence analytics with Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration and Set-Based Design. Procedia Computer Science, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.05 .052 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref19"><unstructured_citation>Ford, D. N., &amp; Sobek, D. (2003). Modeling Real Options to Switch Among Alternatives in Product Development. Industrial Engineering. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref20"><doi>10.1017/dsj.2019.1</doi><unstructured_citation>Georgiades, A., Sharma, S., Kipouros, T., &amp; Savill, M. (2019). ADOPT: An augmented set-based design framework with optimisation. Design Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.1 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref21"><doi>10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.06.006</doi><unstructured_citation>Henry, M., &amp; Kato, Y. (2011). An assessment framework based on social perspectives and Analytic Hierarchy Process: A case study on sustainability in the Japanese concrete industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2 011.06.006 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref22"><doi>10.1080/10429247.2011.11431883</doi><unstructured_citation>Hoppmann, J., Rebentisch, E., Dombrowski, U., &amp; Zahn, T. (2011). A framework for organizing lean product development. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011 .11431883 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref23"><doi>10.1177/1063293x09360833</doi><unstructured_citation>Inoue, M., Nahm, Y. E., Okawa, S., &amp; Ishikawa, H. (2010). Design support system by combination of 3D-CAD and CAE with preference set-based design method. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X0936 0833 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref24"><unstructured_citation>Inoue, M., &amp; Suzuki, W. (2019). Universal design considering physical characteristics of diverse users. International Journal of Automation Technology, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2019.p051 7 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref25"><doi>10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.124</doi><unstructured_citation>Ishikawa, H., &amp; Sasaki, N. (2020). A balanced design for plural performances of technology, economy and environment in product design. Procedia Manufacturing, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020. 02.124 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref26"><unstructured_citation>Kennedy, M. N. (2003). Product development for the lean enterprise: why Toyota’s system is four times more productive and how you can implement it. OakleaPress. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref27"><doi>10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00693_1.x</doi><unstructured_citation>Kennedy, M., Harmon, K., &amp; Minnock, E. (2008). Ready, Set, Dominate: Implement Toyota’s SetBased Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You. OakleaPress. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref28"><doi>10.1080/21650349.2014.899164</doi><unstructured_citation>Kerga, E., Taisch, M., Terzi, S., Bessega, W., &amp; Rosso, A. (2014). Setbased concurrent engineering innovation roadmap (SBCE IR): A case on adiabatic humidification system. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2014 .899164 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref29"><doi>10.1080/0951192x.2011.608723</doi><unstructured_citation>Khan, M. S., Al-Ashaab, A., Shehab, E., Haque, B., Ewers, P., Sorli, M., &amp; Sopelana, A. (2013). Towards lean product and process development. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(12). https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.201 1.608723 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref30"><unstructured_citation>Khan, M. S. (2012). The construction of a model for lean product development. In PQDT - UK &amp; Ireland. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref31"><doi>10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_51</doi><unstructured_citation>Khan, M., Al-Ashaab, A., Doultsinou, A., Shehab, E., Ewers, P., &amp; Sulowski, R. (2011). Set-based concurrent engineering process within the LeanPPD environment. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729- 799-0_51 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref32"><unstructured_citation>Landahl, J., Levandowski, C., Johannesson, H., &amp; Isaksson, O. (2016). Assessing producibility of product platforms using set-based concurrent engineering. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 4. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499- 703-0-35 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref33"><doi>10.1080/10429247.2011.11431887</doi><unstructured_citation>Letens, G., Farris, J. A., &amp; Van Aken, E. M. (2011). A multilevel framework for lean product development system design. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011 .11431887 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref34"><doi>10.1177/1063293x14537654</doi><unstructured_citation>Levandowski, C., Michaelis, M. T., &amp; Johannesson, H. (2014). Set-based development using an integrated product and manufacturing system platform. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X1453 7654 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref35"><doi>10.1080/10429247.2011.11431884</doi><unstructured_citation>Liker, J. K., &amp; Morgan, J. (2011). Lean product development as a system: A case study of body and stamping development at ford. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011 .11431884 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref36"><doi>10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.194</doi><unstructured_citation>Lopes, K. M., &amp; Zancul, E. (2019). Application of set-based concurrent engineering principles in R&amp;D project prioritization. Procedia CIRP, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.0 4.194 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref37"><doi>10.1115/detc2008-49953</doi><unstructured_citation>Madhavan, K., Shahan, D., Seepersad, C. C., Hlavinka, D. A., &amp; Benson, W. (2008). An industrial trial of a setbased approach to collaborative design. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 1(PARTS A AND B). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2008- 49953 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref38"><doi>10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.026</doi><unstructured_citation>Maulana, M. I. I. B. M., Al-Ashaab, A., Flisiak, J. W., Araci, Z. C., Lasisz, P. W., Shehab, E., Beg, N., &amp; Rehman, A. (2017). The Set-based Concurrent Engineering Application: A Process of Identifying the Potential Benefits in the Surface Jet Pump Case Study. Procedia CIRP, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.0 1.026 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref39"><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.013</doi><unstructured_citation>Miranda De Souza, V., &amp; Borsato, M. (2016). Combining Stage-GateTM model using Set-Based concurrent engineering and sustainable end-of-life principles in a product development assessment tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.0 6.013 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref40"><unstructured_citation>Moreno-Grandas, D. P., HernándezLuna, A. A., &amp; Wood, K. L. (2010). Integrating preference and possibility to manage uncertainty in lean design. IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2010 Proceedings. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref41"><doi>10.4324/9781482293746</doi><unstructured_citation>Morgan, J. M., &amp; Liker, J. K. (2006). The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process, and Technology. Productivity Press. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref42"><doi>10.1007/s00170-004-2213-5</doi><unstructured_citation>Nahm, Y. E., &amp; Ishikawa, H. (2006). A new 3D-CAD system for set-based parametric design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 29(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004- 2213-5 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref43"><doi>10.1080/10429247.2011.11431910</doi><unstructured_citation>Nepal, B. P., Yadav, O. P., &amp; Solanki, R. (2011). Improving the npd process by applying lean principles: A case study. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011 .11431910 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref44"><doi>10.1002/qre.4680070210</doi><unstructured_citation>O’Connor, P. D. T. (1991). Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, S. Pugh, Addison-Wesley, 1990. Number of pages: 278, Price: £14.95. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.468007021 0 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref45"><doi>10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_34</doi><unstructured_citation>Qureshi, A. J., Dantan, J. Y., Bruyere, J., &amp; Bigot, R. (2011). Set based robust design of systems-application to flange coupling. Global Product Development - Proceedings of the 20th CIRP Design Conference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642- 15973-2_34 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref46"><unstructured_citation>Radeka, K. (2013). The mastery of innovation: a field guide to lean product development. CRC Press, Taylor &amp; Francis Group. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref47"><doi>10.1002/sys.21449</doi><unstructured_citation>Rapp, S., Chinnam, R., Doerry, N., Murat, A., &amp; Witus, G. (2018). Product development resilience through set-based design. Systems Engineering, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21449 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref48"><unstructured_citation>Raudberget, D. (2010). Practical applications of set-based concurrent engineering in industry. Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56(11). https://doi.org/10.5545/149_DOI_not_ assigned </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref49"><doi>10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102936</doi><unstructured_citation>Rempling, R., Mathern, A., Tarazona Ramos, D., &amp; Luis Fernández, S. (2019). Automatic structural design by a set-based parametric design method. Automation in Construction, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.1 02936 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref50"><doi>10.2514/1.c033747</doi><unstructured_citation>Riaz, A., Guenov, M. D., &amp; MolinaCristobal, A. (2017). Set-based approach to passenger aircraft family design. Journal of Aircraft, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033747 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref51"><doi>10.1109/ieem44572.2019.8978748</doi><unstructured_citation>Saad, D., Rotzer, S., &amp; Zimmermann, M. (2019). Set-based Design in Agile Development: Developing a Banana Sorting Module - A Practical Approach. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.20 19.8978748 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref52"><doi>10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.341</doi><unstructured_citation>Schjøtt-Pedersen, N., Welo, T., Ringen, G., &amp; Raknes, C. A. (2019). Using set-based design for developing a 3D metal forming process. Procedia CIRP, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.0 4.341 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref53"><doi>10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.001</doi><unstructured_citation>Schuh, G., &amp; Drescher, T. (2014). Systematic leverage of technological assets: A case study for automated tissue engineering. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2 013.10.001 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref54"><doi>10.3390/buildings10020034</doi><unstructured_citation>Serugga, J., Kagioglou, M., &amp; Tzortzopolous, P. (2020). A utilitarian decision-making approach for front end design-a systematic literature review. In Buildings (Vol. 10, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10020 034 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref55"><doi>10.1002/sys.21549</doi><unstructured_citation>Shallcross, N., Parnell, G. S., Pohl, E., &amp; Specking, E. (2020). Set-based design: The state-of-practice and research opportunities. In Systems Engineering (Vol. 23, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21549 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref56"><doi>10.1177/1548512919872822</doi><unstructured_citation>Small, C., Parnell, G. S., Pohl, E., Goerger, S. R., Cilli, M., &amp; Specking, E. (2020). Demonstrating set-based design techniques: an unmanned aerial vehicle case study. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/154851291987 2822 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref57"><unstructured_citation>Sobek, D., Ward, A., &amp; Liker, J. (1999). Toyota’s Principles of SetBased Concurrent Engineering. Sloan Management Review, 40(2). </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref58"><doi>10.3390/app11031239</doi><unstructured_citation>Specking, E., Shallcross, N., Parnell, G. S., &amp; Pohl, E. (2021). Quantitative set-based design to inform design teams. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031239 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref59"><doi>10.1504/ijims.2020.110256</doi><unstructured_citation>Suwanda, S., Al-Ashaab, A., &amp; Beg, N. (2020). The development of knowledge-shelf to enable an effective set-based concurrent engineering application. International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIMS.2020.11 0256 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref60"><doi>10.1504/ijplm.2006.008675</doi><unstructured_citation>Telerman, V., Preis, S., Snytnikov, N., &amp; Ushakov, D. (2006). Interval/set based collaborative engineering design. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLM.2006.00 8675 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref61"><doi>10.1017/dsj.2020.16</doi><unstructured_citation>Toche, B., Pellerin, R., &amp; Fortin, C. (2020). Set-based design: A review and new directions. In Design Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.16 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref62"><doi>10.3390/jmse8110932</doi><unstructured_citation>Trueworthy, A., &amp; Dupont, B. (2020). The wave energy converter design process: Methods applied in industry and shortcomings of current practices. In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (Vol. 8, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110932 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref63"><doi>10.1007/s10669-019-09731-5</doi><unstructured_citation>Wade, Z., Parnell, G. S., Goerger, S., Pohl, E., &amp; Specking, E. (2019). Convergent set-based design for complex resilient systems. Environment Systems and Decisions, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669- 019-09731-5 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref64"><doi>10.1108/17410381211196267</doi><unstructured_citation>Wang, L., Ming, X. G., Kong, F. B., Li, D., &amp; Wang, P. P. (2011). Focus on implementation: A framework for lean product development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/174103812111 96267 </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref65"><doi>10.1016/0024-6301(95)94310-u</doi><unstructured_citation>Ward, A., Liker, J. K., Cristiano, J. J., &amp; Sobek, D. K. (1995). The second Toyota paradox: How delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 43. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref66"><unstructured_citation>Ward, A., &amp; Sobek, D. K. (2014). Lean product and process development (2nd ed.). Lean Enterprise Institute, Inc. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref67"><unstructured_citation>Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., &amp; Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates. </unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="ref68"><doi>10.1177/1687814018820383</doi><unstructured_citation>Yi, Y., Li, W., Xiao, M., &amp; Gao, L. (2019). A set strategy approach for multidisciplinary robust design optimization under interval uncertainty. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/168781401882 0383</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article></journal></body></doi_batch>