
• The structural dip within the Asmari reservoir
presents a consistent upward trend in
inclination as depth increases. This gradual
rise culminates in its peak value of 50 degrees
at a depth of 1810 meters, characterized by a
specific azimuth of NNW. However, a notable
deviation in this pattern occurs at 1819 meters,
where a high-angle dip of 59 degrees is
observed. This 59-degree dip stands in
contrast to the typical bedding dips, showing a
nearly opposite direction inclined towards
SSW.Fig. 7 illustrates a significant fault within
the geological structure, prominently
manifesting at 1819 meters. This fault exhibits
a steep dip of 59 degrees with an orientation of
N18W and a striking direction spanning
N72E-S72W. The juxtaposition of this fault's
characteristics against the surrounding
geological features highlights its
distinctiveness within the Asmari reservoir,
marking a pivotal structural element that
significantly diverges from the general dip
trends and orientations observed in the
area.Moreover, an additional potential fault
was discerned within zone five of the Kalhur
members, indicating a repeated section. This
identification suggests the likelihood of a
fault-induced repetition of geological layers
within this specific zone of the Kalhur
members, further contributing to the structural
complexity and geological variations within
the reservoir.
• Between the depth levels of 1805 to 1820
meters, a distinctive geological feature known
as a "drag zone" shows within the up-thrown
block. This zone is characterized by a obvious
and notable downward surge in the magnitude
of dip. This dip magnitude signifies the angle
at which the rock layers or geological strata
are inclined concerning the horizontal
plane.The occurrence of this downward
increase in dip magnitude denotes an area
where geological forces or structural
movements have exerted an influence,
resulting in a dragging effect on the
formations within the up-thrown block. This
alteration in dip angle within this specified
depth range signals localized geological
complexities, possibly arising from various
tectonic activities, faulting, or other subsurface
processes.Identifying this drag zone holds
paramount significance in unraveling the
intricate geological dynamics within the
Asmari Reservoir. It serves as a significant
sign of potential structural disturbances or
differential movements within this specific
depth interval, contributing profoundly to the
comprehension of the reservoir's geological
evolution and aiding in more accurate
predictive models of its behavior(Fig. 8).
• Within the interval of 1823.5 to 1844 meters, a
distinct and disrupted zone is identified within
the Asmari reservoir. This zone exhibits a
notable characteristic where the dips of
geological layers point in diverse directions,
showcasing a lack of consistent orientation.
Additionally, a specific high-angle feature is
observed in a NNW (north-northwest) dipping
direction around the depth of 1825 meters
within this disturbed zone.As the analysis
descends below this disturbed zone, the
pattern of bedding dips undergoes a shift.
Specifically, in the subsequent interval
spanning from 1844 to 1998 meters, the
bedding dips within the Asmari reservoir
regress to an average inclination of
approximately 22 degrees in the SSW (south-
southwest) direction.This shift in the dip
behavior denotes a transition from the earlier
disrupted zone, where the dips were scattered
in various directions, to a more uniform
bedding orientation characterized by an
average dip of 22 degrees in the SSW
direction. Understanding this transition aids in
comprehending the structural alterations and
variations within the reservoir, delineating
distinct zones with different dip characteristics
that can significantly impact the reservoir's
geological behavior and fluid flow
dynamics(Fig. 8).
In addition to the direct examination of the images,
open-hole logs were employed to confirm a fault or
qualify a feature as a fault in cases where the factors
listed in the above-mentioned criteria did not entirely
apply. This helps validate the interpretation of the
fault.Log analysis involves two crucial steps to
interpret potential faults or fractures:
International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Materials
DOI: 10.37394/232031.2023.2.12
Zohreh Movahed, Ali Asghar Movahed