1. Introduction
IGHLY sensitive microwave detectors are essential for
biomedical research, security control and atmospheric
monitoring. In this field superconducting devices such as
Josephson broadband and selective detectors, mixers, Hilbert
spectrometers offer a viable option. In contrast to conventional
niobium devices high-temperature superconductors (HTSC)
have higher operating temperatures and wider THz frequency
response. Grain-boundary Josephson junctions (JJs) have
already proven their advantages [1]-[3]. Table I shows
parameters of Josephson detectors obtained in different works
for nitrogen temperatures.
The analysis and comparison of the results of Table I is
difficult due to some difference in the working temperature
and the frequency of external influence. Moreover, not all
works contain information about for what type of power,
incident or absorbed, the value of responsivity rV was
obtained. In addition, in paper [4] a frequency selective
responsivity has been measured instead of a broadband one.
Nevertheless, for a numerical analysis as close to reality as
possible we used the sample parameters from these works.
To model the broadband response of a non-hysteretic
junction a resistively shunted junction model is usually
employed [9]-[12]. To simulate such systems quantitatevly we
will use a resistively and capacitively shunted junction (RSCJ)
model even though the junction does not exhibit hysteresis in
its current-voltage characteristics.
The aim of this paper is to study the influence of the
Josephson junction finite capacitance on the characteristics of
the broadband response for different frequencies of external
signal, different ICRN product and optimal IC and RN
parameters at 77 K.
2. Numerical Results
The investigation was performed using the RSCJ model
where the junction phase φ with a critical current IC,
capacitance C, resistance RN is described by the stochastic
differential equation [13]-[14]
BFmwmwC
N
IItFII
R
V
dt
dV
C )2sin(sin
(1)
where voltage V is defined as the derivative dφ/dt∙2πΦ0 with
the magnetic flux quantum Φ0; thermal fluctuations IF are
treated as white Gaussian noise with zero mean and correlation
function < IF(t)IF(t+τ) > = (kBT) / (πRN) δ(τ). A simple
harmonic signal of amplitude Imw and frequency Fmw = ωmw/2π
describes external radiation with power Pmw = Imw2 RN / 2.
Broadband THz detection by YBaCuO Josephson junctions having
finite capacitance
EKATERINA A. MATROZOVA, LEONID S. REVIN,
Institute for Physics of Microstructures of RAS, GSP-105, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia
Superconducting Nanoelectronics Laboratory, Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, n.a. R.E.
Alekseev, 603950 Nizhny Novgorod, RUSSIA
H
Table I. Experimental parameters of YBaCuO bicrystal detectors
obtained in different works. Here rV is the responsivity.
Abstract:—Broadband classical detection of THz radiation by a YBaCuO Josephson junction was studied on
the basis of resistively-capacitively shunted junction model. Numerical simulation was based on the parameters
of the samples experimentally studied in other works at nitrogen temperatures. It is shown that taking into
account the damping of the Josephson junction becomes essential for high frequencies of external signal. The
absolute value of responsivity decreases as junction capacitance increases. Damping parameter also influences
the choice of optimal IC and RN parameters.
Keywords:YBaCuO Josephson junction, broadband detector, responsivity, RCSJ model.
Received: May 14, 2022. Revised: October 8, 2022. Accepted: November 16, 2022. Published: December 31, 2022.
International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Materials
DOI: 10.37394/232031.2022.1.2
Ekaterina A. Matrozova, Leonid S. Revin
E-ISSN: 2945-0519
9
Volume 1, 2022
The receiving characteristics of JJ was analyzed in the bias
current regime to study the responsivity rV in the broadband
detection mode. That is, at the bias current near the critical one
the voltage increment is associated with the change in the
power of the incident signal.
For clarity, Fig. 1a shows current-voltage characteristic and
differential resistance RD for the experimental parameters from
[3]: T = 77 K, IC = 80 μA, RN = 1.5 Ω. Determining the
capacitance of the Josephson junction, and, accordingly, the
damping parameter α = 1/RN ( ћ/(2eICC) )-2 is quite difficult
task. Nevertheless, estimations can be made based on the
fitting of IV curves for different temperatures. For the
experimental current-voltage characteristics from Fig. 3 of [3]
the capacitance value of JJ obtained from the fitting is C190
fF 4 for T = 77 K). While for IVs from Fig. 1 of [15] C
2 fF, and it can be assumed that for this case α will be no more
than 3 for nitrogen temperature. Figure 1 was obtained for two
different damping parameters: for the case of overdumped
junction with α = 50 (curve marked with 1) and for α = 3
(curve marked with 2). While the current-voltage
characteristics and RD for the two cases are almost the same,
the response ΔV to a small external signal with Fmw = 614
GHz; Pmw = 10 nW is different (Fig. 1b). This effect will be
described in more detail further.
Choosing an optimal bias IB, we get the maximum voltage
response to the external signal at a given power. Then
responsivity is defined as derivation rV = dV / dPmw. The
voltage amplitude of the response ΔV is a linear function of the
radiation power at low values of this power (the inset of Fig.
2). Thus, the responsivity is constant and has a maximum
value for small external signals, Fig. 2. Note that for the case
of α = 50 the max rV is ~ 2.2 times greater than for the case of
α = 3. At the same time, the responsivity for curve 1 decreases
faster with increasing power than for curve 2. To describe the
rV(Pmw) dependency we will use the upper limit of the power
dynamic range PS defined as the power at which the detector
responsivity decreases by a factor of two.
Let us examine the influence of damping on the value of the
maximum responsivity for different frequency Fmw (Fig. 3). It
is convenient to perform this using the parameters of two
detectors with different ICRN product from Table I. In the
absent of fluctuations and for the normalized frequency Ωmw =
Fmw / FС > 1, where FС is the characteristic frequency, the
analytical formula for the broadband responsivity was obtained
in the framework of the resistively shunted (RSJ) model [9]:
2
1
2mw
NC
D
VRI
R
r
(2)
where Ωmw = Fmw / (ICRN ∙ 2e/ћ).
Figure 3 shows the data for ICRN = 0.12 mV (curves marked
with 2) and normalized frequencies Ωmw from 3 to 17. The
result for α = 50 is in complete agreement with the analytical
formula. At the same time, a decrease in damping leads to a
stronger rV(Fmw) dependence. A similar dependence on α was
observed in the study of Shapiro steps [16]. In this case, the 0th
Shapiro step, that is, the critical current, can be approximately
considered as the broadband current response of the Josephson
junction in the voltage bias regime. It has been shown that the
IC(P) dependence is slower for lower damping, which means
that the responsivity dIC/dP decreases with decreasing α. This
result can be explained by the increase of the junction
admittance in the simple RC-model. The frequency at which
the influence of α becomes significant is determined by the
condition: FmwFP2 / FC, where FP = (2eICC)-2 is the plasma
frequency. So for curve 2 in Fig. 3 for α = 3 this frequency
Fig. 1 a) Left (solid curve): IV characteristics for IC = 80 μA, RN =
1.5 Ω, T = 77 K without an external signal. Right (dashed
curve): Differential resistance RD. Curves for the two alpha values
α = 3, α = 50 are almost the same. (b) Response ΔV to an external
signal with Fmw = 614 GHz; Pmw = 10 nW depending on the bias
current for two values of α.
International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Materials
DOI: 10.37394/232031.2022.1.2
Ekaterina A. Matrozova, Leonid S. Revin
E-ISSN: 2945-0519
10
Volume 1, 2022
corresponds to 550 GHz. For α = 2 - 230 GHz and for α = 1 -
60 GHz.
For ICRN = 0.9 mV (curves marked with 1) the normalized
frequencies Ωmw are from 0.1 to 2. For Ωmw > 1 the dependence
is similar to the one discussed above. For low frequencies the
responsivity dependence is slower than 1/Ωmw2. In this region,
the difference in rV values for different damping is small and is
associated with a larger value of RD for smaller α.
The dependence of the upper limit of the power dynamic
range on frequency for different α shows an inverse character,
Fig. 4. In the Ωmw > 1 limit PS - value increases with increasing
frequency and decreasing α.
Now let us consider the task of finding the optimal IC and RN
parameters for a given values of ICRN at a temperature of 77 K
to obtain maximum broadband responsivity. Technologically
this task can be solved by adjusting the geometry of the
junction, in particular by the film thickness. IC and RN
parameters can also be changed by low-temperature annealing
of bicrystal junctions in ozone atmosphere [17], annealing in
atomic oxygen [18] and by oxygen aging [19]. In [10] the
results of numerical simulations for the responsivity as well as
the noise-equivalent power (NEP) was obtained in the
framework of RSJ model with thermal noise. There, the rV-
values have their maximum at RN ~ ICRN) / (2ekT) for
normalized frequencies Ωmw < 1 and should have them at RN ~
(Ωmw ћICRN) / (2ekT) for large Ωmw 1. Simulation for α = 50
shows a similar result, Fig. 5. As α decreases, the optimal RN
value shifts to the right, and the responsivity maximum
becomes flatter.
Figure 6 demonstrates optimal RN -value for the greatest
responsivity versus frequency for different α. It can be seen
that the optimal RN is the same for different damping in low
frequency region Fmw < FС while in high frequency region the
RN(Fmw) dependence is almost linear with different slopes.
Fig. 3 Maximum responsivity depending on the frequency Fmw for
ICRN = 0.9 mV (curves marked with 1) and for ICRN = 0.12 mV
(marked with 2) from Table I. Solid curves - α = 50, long dashed
curves - α = 3, short dashed curves - α = 2, dotted curves - α = 1.
Fig. 4 The upper limit of the power dynamic range on the
frequency Fmw for ICRN = 0.12 mV from Table I. Solid curves - α =
50, long dashed curves - α = 3, short dashed curves - α = 2, dotted
curves - α = 1.
International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Materials
DOI: 10.37394/232031.2022.1.2
Ekaterina A. Matrozova, Leonid S. Revin
E-ISSN: 2945-0519
11
Volume 1, 2022
3. Conclusions and Discussion
We have shown that taking into account finite damping can
lead to a change in the rV(Fmw) dependence even for α = 3. In
the high frequency region Fmw FP2 / FC the absolute value of
responsivity decreases as α decreases. At the same time, the
dependence of the upper limit of the power dynamic range on
damping is inverse. For a more detailed analysis, it is required
to investigate the NEP(α) dependence and, as a consequence,
to investigate the power dynamic range D = PS / NEP F)-2,
where ΔF is the frequency band in which the output signal is
measured.
Damping parameter also influences the choice of IC and RN
for optimal broadband detection. As α decreases, the
recommendations shift to the region of higher normal
resistances and lower critical currents compared to the
overdamped junction.
Accounting for finite damping is important even when
analyzing the characteristics of HTSC detectors at nitrogen
temperatures. The RCSJ model should be applied for
frequencies Fmw above FP2 / FC.
References
[1] O. Volkov, V. Pavlovskiy, I. Gundareva, R.
Khabibullin, Y. Divin, ”In Situ Hilbert-transform
spectral analysis of pulsed terahertz radiation of
quantum cascade lasers by high-Tc Josephson
junctions,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol.,
vol. 11, pp. 330-338, 2021.
[2] V.V. Pavlovskiy, I.I. Gundareva, O.Y. Volkov, Y.Y.
Divin, "Wideband detection of electromagnetic
signals by high-Tc Josephson junctions with
comparable Josephson and thermal energies," Appl.
Phys. Lett., vol. 116, p. 082601, 2020.
[3] J. Du, K. Smart, L. Li, K.E. Leslie, S.M. Hanham,
D.H.C. Wang, C.P. Foley, F. Ji, X.D. Li, D.Z. Zeng,
"A cryogen-free HTS Josephson junction detector
for terahertz imaging," Supercond. Sci. Technol.,
vol. 28, p. 084001, 2015.
[4] M.V. Lyatti, D.A. Tkachev, Yu.Ya. Divin, "Signal
and noise characteristics of a terahertz frequency-
selective YBa2Cu3O7-x Josephson detector," Techn.
Phys. Lett., vol. 32, pp. 860-863, 2006.
[5] G.A. Ovsyannikov, I.V. Borisenko, K.Y.
Constantinian, Y.V. Kislinski, A.A. Hakhoumian,
N.G. Pogosyan, T. Zakaryan, N.F. Pedersen, J.
Mygind, N. Uzunoglu, E. Karagianni, "Bandwidth
and noise of submillimeter wave cuprate bicrystal
Josephson junction detectors," IEEE Trans. Appl.
Supercond., vol. 15, pp. 533-536, 2005.
[6] M.A. Tarasov, E.A. Stepantsov, A.S. Kalabukhov,
M.Yu. Kupriyanov, D. Winkler, "Temperature
sensitivity and noise of an HTSC Josephson detector
on a sapphire bicrystal substrate at 77 K," J. Exp.
Theor. Phys. Letters, vol. 86, pp. 718-720, 2007.
[7] M. Kawasaki, P. Chaudhari, A. Gupta, "1/f noise in
YBa2Cu3O7-δ superconducting bicrystal grain-
boundary junctions," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 68, pp.
1065-1068, 1992.
[8] M.A. Tarasov, D. Golubev, V. Shumeiko, Z. Ivanov,
E.A. Stepantsov, O. Harnak, T. Claeson,
“Subharmonic Shapiro steps and noise in high-Tc
superconductor Josephson junctions,” J. Exp. Theor.
Phys. Letters, vol. 68, pp. 454-459, 1998.
[9] H. Kanter, F.L. Vernon, "Response of
superconducting point contacts to high frequency
radiation," Phys. Lett., vol. 35A, no.5, p. 349, 1971.
[10] A.N. Vystavkin, V.N. Gubankov, L.S. Kuzmin,
K.K. Likharev, V.V. Migulin, V.K. Semenov, "S-c-
S junctions as nonlinear elements of microwave
receiving devices," Rev. Phys. Appl., vol. 9, p. 79,
1974.
[11] Y.Y. Divin, V.V. Pavlovskii, D.A. Tkachev, O.Y.
Volkov, V.N. Gubankov, K. Urban, "Broadband
THz detection by high-Tc Josephson junctions,"
Joint 31st International Conference on Infrared
Millimeter Waves and 14th International
Conference on Teraherz Electronics, p. 345, 2006.
[12] V.V. Pavlovskiy, Y.Y. Divin, "Limiting
Characteristics of Classical Josephson Detector,"
Journ. Comm. Tech. Electronic., vol. 64, pp. 1003-
1010, 2019.
[13] M.J. Stephen, "Noise in a driven Josephson
oscillator," Phys. Rev., vol. 186, pp. 393-397, 1969.
[14] K.K. Likharev, "Dynamics of Josephson junctions
and circuits," New York: Gordon and Breach
Science Publishers, Chap. 13, 1986.
[15] I. Gundareva, V. Pavlovskiy, Y. Divin, "High-Tc
Josephson junctions as quasiclassical THz
detectors," IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 28,
p. 1800105, 2018.
[16] Y. Mizugaki, J. Chen, K. Nakajima, T. Yamashita,
"Numerical evaluation for the high-frequency
response of Josephson junctions having finite
capacitance," Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 37, pp. 5971-
5972, 1998.
International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Materials
DOI: 10.37394/232031.2022.1.2
Ekaterina A. Matrozova, Leonid S. Revin
E-ISSN: 2945-0519
12
Volume 1, 2022
[17] I.I. Gundareva, O.Y. Volkov, M.V. Lyatti, Y.Y.
Divin, V.N. Gubankov, V.V. Pavlovskiy, "Evolution
of electrical and electrodynamic properties of
YBa2Cu3O7-x bicrystal Josephson junctions with
oxygen loading," IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.,
vol. 21, pp. 147-150, 2011.
[18] M.A. Tarasov, E.A. Stepantsov, M. Naito, A.
Tsukada, D. Winkler, A.S. Kalabukhov, M.Yu.
Kupriyanov, "Superconducting weak bonds at grain
boundaries in MgB2," J. Exp. Theor. Phys., vol. 105,
pp. 636–641, 2007.
[19] M.V. Lyatti, U. Poppe, Y.Y. Divin, "Electrical
transport and noise properties of [100]-tilt
YBa2Cu3O7-x grain-boundary junctions with high
IcRn Product," IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol.
17, pp. 314-317, 2007.
Contribution of individual authors to the
creation of a scientific article (ghostwriting
policy)
Author Contributions: Please, indicate the role and
the contribution of each author:
Example
Ekaterina Matrozova carried out the simulation and the
optimization.
Leonid Revin has implemented the numerical scheme in
C and general guidance.
Sources of funding for research presented in a
scientific article or scientific article itself
The work was supported by the Russian Science
Foundation (Project No.20-79-10384).
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International , CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US
International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Materials
DOI: 10.37394/232031.2022.1.2
Ekaterina A. Matrozova, Leonid S. Revin
E-ISSN: 2945-0519
13
Volume 1, 2022