Three-Phase Four-Wire Hybrid Active Power Filter for Mitigating
Harmonic Problems Caused by CFLs Lamps based on a Shunt Active
Power Filter SAPF in Parallel with a Passive Filter
MOHAMED HAJJEJ, LASSAAD SBITA
Process Laboratory, Energetic, Environment and Electrical System (PEESE),
National Engineering School of Gabès (ENIG),
University of Gabès,
TUNISIA
Abstract: - The widespread integration of nonlinear loads across industrial, commercial, and residential settings
has significantly exacerbated power quality issues within contemporary power distribution systems. An
example of such nonlinear loads is the prevalent use of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), intended as
replacements for incandescent lamps (ILs). CFLs have gained popularity owing to their reduced energy
consumption and extended lifespan, contributing to their extensive use across various applications. But those
lamps inject high harmonic current in the power system. To address this issue, a hybrid active power filter
HAPF based on a shunt active power filter SAPF in parallel with a passive filter (PF) is implemented in this
paper. The reference current is calculated based on the PQ theory, and the voltage source inverter VSI is
controlled via a simple hysteresis current controller (HCC). The results show that the PF is suitable to
compensate for the Hight harmonic generated by both the load and the switched device of the APF. Also, this
HAPF is well designed and implemented to mitigate all harmonic generated by CFL lamps on the power
system, and compensate the reactive power. The THD of the current is reduced from 90.75% before
compensation to 0.75% after compensation. This implies that the main injects only the Fundamental current to
the power.
Key-Words: - Shunt active power filter (SAPF), passive filter (PF), PQ theory, hysteresis current controller
(HCC), hybrid active power filter (HAPF), Harmonics, current compensation, THD.
Received: August 13, 2023. Revised: February 7, 2024. Accepted: March 5, 2024. Published: April 8, 2024.
1 Introduction
In recent years, the escalating use of semiconductor
devices and nonlinear loads across various
applications has made power quality issues a
significant concern in power systems. Such as
residential or industrial loads and in particular the
light loads that represent 25% of the total power
loads, [1]. The massive use of Compact fluorescent
lamps CFLs injects high harmonic current into the
main systems for all harmonic levels, [2]. So,
harmonic currents, in particular, have become a
major focus in this context. Passive power filters
(PFs) primarily composed of inductive and
capacitive elements (L-C) are considered the best
low-cost solutions that offer fixed current
compensation. Diverging from Active Power Filters
APFs that provide dynamic and adaptable solutions.
They proactively respond to power quality issues,
affording precise control while minimizing
resonance effects often associated with passive
filters. Additionally, Shunt APFs offer advantages in
terms of sizing and flexibility, making them the
preferred choice for addressing power quality
challenges, [3]. Shunt active power filters (SAPFs)
are widely employed to manage current harmonics,
reactive power compensation, and neutral current
compensation in distribution systems. Typically
installed at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) as
presented in Figure 1, where nonlinear loads
connect with the utility grid, these filters are more
adept at mitigating current harmonics compared to
passive power filters (PFs), which offer fixed
compensation and are limited by factors like
resonance effects and specific sizing, [4].
Presently, the attention of researchers and
developers is directed toward both the design and
control aspects of SAPFs tailored for three-phase
four-wire (3ph-4W) nonlinear loads. So, various
SAPF topologies have emerged to tackle these
challenges, including the four-leg (4L) configuration
[5], the split capacitor or two capacitors (2C)
approach [6] and the three H-bridges (3-HB)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
23
Volume 23, 2024
topology, each H-bridge comprising four switches
arranged in an H shape [7], which is illustrated in
Figure 2.
In the split capacitor topology, the neutral wire
resides between two capacitors, necessitating an
additional control loop to maintain the DC voltage
balance between the capacitors. In contrast, the 4L
configuration introduces two active switches to the
fourth leg (neutral wire) to balance the neutral
current, resulting in superior performance compared
to the 2C topology. This configuration has been
extensively explored in various research studies, [8],
[9]. Conversely, the 3-HB inverter topology
employs three full H-bridges sharing a DC-link
capacitor, requiring three single-phase isolated
transformers to connect the 3-HB filter to the system
and more switches than other configurations.
While those researchers are focusing on
optimizing and creating various parallel active filter
topologies, others delve into perfecting the control
aspect, which represents the "heart" of these filters.
The efficacy of the filtering process is closely tied to
the reference current extraction algorithm. These
methodologies typically fall into two main
categories: frequency domain methods and time
domain methods.
Frequency domain methods, such as the fast
Fourier transform (FFT), extract harmonic
components from distorted voltage and current
signals. Despite providing precise values of
harmonic amplitude and phases, these techniques
suffer from aliasing effects, spectral leakage, and
slow response times due to heavy computational
loads, necessitating complex systems for real-time
operation.
Conversely, time domain methods, including the
p-q theory, instantaneous reactive power theory,
synchronous reference frame theory (SRF), and p-q-
r theory, have gained attention. SRF employing a
phase-locked loop (PLL) system, ensures
undistorted transformation angles even under
unbalanced source conditions, enabling its usage for
voltage and current reference generation. The
reference currents serve as inputs to the power
switch control block.
Hysteresis control algorithms (HCA) represent
simple and practical techniques for SAPF and power
switch device control. HCA operates with two
predefined bands, ensuring the modulated currents
remain within specified limits, resulting in close
tracking of the compensating current to the
reference current. HCA determines the VSI
(Voltage Source Inverter) switches' "ON" and
"OFF" states, leading to straightforward
implementation, robustness, and high performance.
However, HCA is constrained by a limited
frequency range and nonlinear effects. Addressing
these limitations, researchers have introduced a new
technique called pulse width modulation (PWM)
control, which generates a modulation signal to
adjust the duty cycle of power electronic switches,
[10], in wish is not the subject of this paper.
Moreover, and based on previous experimental
and simulation research, we found that the load
generates high harmonics for both low and high
harmonic levels. Also, it is noticed that the
switching devices of the APF may inject some
harmonic and in particular high frequency. So, as a
solution to mitigate both harmonics generated by
CFL and APF in high frequency levels a Hybrid
active power filter HAPF is proposed in this paper.
The HAPF consists of a second-order high-pass
passive filter in parallel with an APF. The overall
system is estimated, and implemented by MATLAB
Simulink software. This is crucial to comply with
relevant national and international harmonic
standards, including NTF 15-520 and IEC61000-3-
2, [11], [12]. Also, Shunt Active Power Filters can
be used in industrial setups where Variable
Frequency Drives are employed. VFDs often
introduce harmonic distortion into the power
system, and SAPFs can help mitigate these
harmonics, ensuring a cleaner and more stable
power supply.
This paper employs the PQ theory for
calculating reference currents and utilizes hysteresis
current controllers HCC for pulse signal generation
to control the switching device of the SAPF.
Moreover, the research introduces a parallel-
operating Shunt Active Power Filter (SAPF) aimed
at mitigating high-order harmonic currents within
the load, significantly enhancing power quality
while diminishing disruptions caused by harmonic
distortions. The prevalence of nonlinear loads in
industrial, commercial, and residential systems has
precipitated substantial power quality challenges in
modern power distribution systems. Notably,
harmonic currents and reactive power emerge as
pivotal concerns among these issues.
The paper's structure is delineated as follows:
Section 2 provides a brief description of the CFL
load used and presents the experimental impact of
the massive use of these loads on the power system.
Section 3 intricately details the three-phase four-
wire Shunt Hybrid Power Filter SHPF with a four-
leg configuration and split capacitor topology. This
section also offers insights into the design and
modeling of Passive Filter. Also, it provides a
detailed analysis of the application of the PQ theory
for calculating compensation current and the Fixed
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
24
Volume 23, 2024
Hysteresis Control method implemented to manage
the switching devices of the APF. Furthermore,
Section 4 presents an exhaustive analysis of
simulation results and the effectiveness of harmonic
mitigation strategies. Finally, Section 5 concludes
the paper by summarizing the findings and
contributions of this research pursuit.
Fig. 1: Bloc diagram of the SAPF connected to the
distribution network
Fig. 2: Harmonic current compensation
classification based on the power circuit
2 Investigation of the Impact of CFL
Loads based on Experimental Tests
To quantify the effect of the massive use of CFL
loads on the distribution network many
experimental previous tests were carried out, [13].
Figure 3 shows the general scheme proposed in the
experimental setup for a large number of GE CFL
lamps powered by a three-phase system, this figure
includes 75 lamps distributed across 3 AC-50Hz
phases (25 lamps in parallel for each phase). A
power analyzer, C. A 8336, is used to obtain data
related to electrical parameters for any given point.
The analyzer is configured in three-phase mode.
This device is used to visualize data on-site and
store it in digital form, which can be later retrieved
using a computer and software provided by the
manufacturer of the power analyzer. Therefore, it is
important to note that all experimental figures in this
research work are generated using the software
provided by the manufacturing company (the latest
version), called “Power Pad III” designed for all
Chauvin Arnoux CA 8331, 8335, and 8336 devices,
[14].







Fig. 3: Experimental setup for harmonic CFL
investigations
Chauvin Arnoux CA 8331, 8335, and 8336
devices, [15], utilize equation (1) to compute the
various harmonics (XTHD) for both voltage and
current. Additionally, equation (2) is employed to
determine the corresponding angle (φk) in degrees
(°) relative to the fundamental. It is important to
highlight that these calculations are executed
through a 16-bit FFT with 1024 data points covering
four cycles, and a rectangular window is applied
following the specifications outlined in IEC61000-
4-7. The harmonic factor for each phase (j) and
order (h) is then derived from the real parts (bk) and
imaginary parts (ak) expressed in equation (3).
(1)
(2)
where, X denotes the signal captured by the device,
representing either the current (A) or the voltage (V)
of the load. X[j][1] specifically signifies the
fundamental signal for each phase j (where 1≤j≤3),
and the variable h corresponds to the harmonic
index.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
25
Volume 23, 2024
(3)
In this context, Fs represents the sampled signal
at the fundamental frequency f4, and k stands for the
index of the spectral spike. It's essential to note that
the order of the harmonic component is directly
related to k/4.
From the founded results in [13], it is easy to
observe that the current waveforms of CFLs are not
sinusoidal for all three phases and are not in phase
with the source voltages. Also, the neutral current is
not equal to zero. The harmonic spectrum of CFLs,
summarizes the origins of these disturbances and the
non-linearity of the load. This load acts as a
generator of significant harmonic currents that
propagate back to the distribution source, potentially
affecting other loads connected to the same network.
Various parameters measured by the power analyzer
are illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1. Main measured parameters with C.A 8336
P (kW)
PF
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
0.5013
0.5013
0.4943
0.668
0.655
0.647
S (kVA)
I_rms (A)
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
0.7507
0.7793
0.7636
3.16
3.27
3.2
V_rms (V)
φ (°)
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
237.5
238.1
237.4
24
24
24
ATHD (%)
VTHD (%)
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
Phase
« a »
Phase
« b »
Phase
« c »
86.2
88.5
90.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
For instance, the total powers absorbed by 75
GE LFC 20W lamps distributed across phases a, b,
and c are respectively P(a) = 501.3W, P(b) =
501.3W, and P(c) = 494.3W. Additionally, poor
power factors of 0.668, 0.665, and 0.647 are
observed for the three phases. Despite the low active
power consumed by these CFLs, the reactive power
consumed is significantly considerable for phases a,
b, and c, with S(a) = 0.7507 kVA, S(b) = 0.7793
kVA, and S(c) = 0.7636 kVA.
Figure 4 presents the experimental results of the
effect of harmonic distortion of voltages as a
function of the number of lamps for phase a. Also,
as depicted in Table 1 and Figure 4, an increase in
voltage THD V_THD from 3.4% to 5.3%. This value
is outside the order of the international standards,
[11], [12]. It provides a detailed measurement for
the three-line source. For instance, the A_THD for the
three phases a, b and c are 86.2%, 88.5%, and
90.4%, respectively. From Table 1 it can be also
seen that the CFL current was delayed to the voltage
of 24° for the three phases, which may have harmful
effects on the distribution network.
Fig. 4: Voltage THD as a function of the number of
lamps (Experimental setup)
To improve the power quality and to cancel the
harmonics generated by these non-linear loads on
the mains side, we will present in the next two
sections the proposed filter. At first, a passive power
filter for some special harmonic currents ranks
compensations applied for the same load. Second,
an active power filter will be applied to attenuate all
other harmonics and for reactive current
compensation. Both filters are connected in parallel
with the load.
3 Shunt Hybrid Power Filter
When both voltage and current are causing
problems and distortion in the power system, more
sophisticated filters are employed. These filters,
known as hybrid filters, [16], are a combination of
active and passive filters. Designing a passive filter
necessitates a thorough understanding of the
harmonic-producing load and the power system.
Passive filters, because they always provide reactive
compensation to a certain extent depending on the
volt-ampere rating and voltage of the capacitor bank
used, can be designed to serve the dual purpose of
filtering and power factor correction to the desired
level, [17]. As a result, passive filter design must
consider potential increases in harmonic current
sources or load reconfiguration, as these factors can
lead to overloading, which can develop quickly.
3.1 Passive Filter
Passive filters are electrical devices that reduce the
propagation of harmonics produced by non-linear
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
26
Volume 23, 2024
loads. A passive filter is installed in parallel to the
power grid as shown in Figure 5, providing a very
low impedance around the frequency to be filtered.
Two types of passive filters can be distinguished:
the resonant passive filter, and the damped passive
filter or high-pass filter, [18]. They are presented
respectively, by Figure 6(a) and Figure 6(b) The
primary components of a passive filter include
inductance L, capacitance C, and resistance R.
Compared to other harmonic elimination methods;
passive filters are relatively inexpensive. Their
applications include shunting harmonic currents
away from the power line or blocking their flow
between system components by tuning the elements
to resonate at a selected harmonic frequency, [19].
Fig. 5: Basic single-line diagram of a passive
compensator
a) Resonant passive filter
b) Damped passive filter
Fig. 6: Types of Passive Filter
Resonant passive filter: It is a very selective
filter. It can be connected in parallel with
other resonant filters.
Damped passive filter: It is the preferred
choice for attenuating a whole frequency
band.
These devices are used to prevent harmonic
currents from propagating in electrical grids. They
can also be used to compensate for reactive power.
Despite their widespread use in industry due to their
ease of installation, these devices can present many
disadvantages, such as their short lifespan and very
little flexibility;
Lack of flexibility to adapt to network and
load variations.
Bulky equipment.
Resonance problems with network
impedance.
The presence of multiple harmonic orders,
including the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 11th, in the
measured current necessitates the implementation of
harmonic filtering. Two filter configurations are
viable options: a single second-order, C-type high-
pass filter or a combination of parallel-connected
single-tuned filters. A comprehensive analysis
conducted in [20], revealed that employing a set of
combined single-tuned filters, each tuned to the
respective 5th, 7th, and 11th harmonic orders, is the
most effective strategy for mitigating these three
harmonic orders. In contrast, a second-order high-
pass filter is utilized to address harmonics ranging
from the 17th to the 49th orders.
3.2 Passive Filter Design Parameters
In a three-phase system with loads like compact
fluorescent lamps, the utilization of parallel passive
filters proves to be a critical solution for mitigating
harmonic distortions. These filters are designed to
control specific harmonics generated by these non-
linear loads, thus significantly improving the power
quality. Mathematically, the design of these parallel
passive filters involves the use of fundamental
equations based on the passive filter topology.
3.2.1 Single-tuned (Resonant) Filter Design
For instance, in a parallel RLC filter, the filter
impedance can be determined by equation (4), [21].
(4)
where Z represents the impedance, j is the imaginary
unit, is the frequency, C is the capacitance of the
capacitor, and L denotes the coil's inductance. These
filters selectively divert undesirable harmonics to
enhance current quality and ensure a more stable
operation of the three-phase electrical system.
The sizing of the different parameters R, L, and
C is done by the following equations (5)-(9)
(5)
(6)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
27
Volume 23, 2024
(7)
(8)
(9)
In this context, X represents the reactance of
either the inductor or the capacitor at the resonant
frequency. Also, it should be noted that a typical
range for Q must be between 30 and 60.
3.2.2 Single Tuned (Resonant) Filter Design
The second-order high-pass filter resembles a
single-tuned filter, with the key difference being the
parallel arrangement of inductors (L) and resistors
(R) instead of the series arrangement observed in
single-tuned filters (Figure 6(b)). This configuration
offers enhanced filtering performance and reduces
energy losses at the fundamental frequency.
The impedance of this filter is given by equation
10:
(10)
But the quality factor is different compared to
the single tuned filter, it is given by 11:
(11)
3.3 Shunt Active Power Filter
The active filter connected in parallel to the
network, as shown in Figure 1, [22], [23], is most
often controlled as a current generator. It injects into
the network disruptive currents equal to those
absorbed by the polluting load but in phase
opposition with them, in order to restore the electric
network current to a sinusoidal shape, as illustrated
in Figure 7(c). It prevents disruptive currents
(harmonics, reactive, and unbalanced currents)
produced by polluting loads from flowing through
the impedance of the network, located upstream of
the active filter connection point. Figure 1
represents the general structure of the parallel active
filter, which consists of a single block. Only the
power parts were presented. The control-command
part will be presented in the next section. The power
part is composed of the:
1. A voltage inverter based on power switches,
controllable at initiation and blocking (GTO,
IGBT, etc.) with anti-parallel diodes.
2. An energy storage circuit, often capacitive.
3. An output filter.
a) injected current
b) load current
c) Source current
Fig. 7: Source current at different points of APF
applied to a 3 phases rectifier connected to an RL
load
3.3.1 Mathematical Fundamentals of the
Harmonic Detection Technique
The load current is influenced by the line impedance
connected to the power sources during steady-state
conditions and the equations for calculating the load
current can be derived as follows, [24]:
(12)
Where :
,
, and
It is clear from equation (12) that the variables
, and represent the
fundamental active current, fundamental reactive
current, and the harmonic current of the Three-
Phases Four-wires load respectively. To compensate
the harmonic and reactive currents, the active
current can be isolated from the equation. Thus, the
required compensation currents (13) that the active
power filter must generate are those that need to be
injected.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
28
Volume 23, 2024
(13)
The overall efficiency of the Active Power
Filter (APF) was discovered to hinge on both the
accuracy of the reference current extraction method
and the control of Voltage Source Inverter (VSI)
switching devices. To extract reference currents, an
algorithm rooted in the PQ technique was devised
and implemented. This algorithm facilitated the
real-time extraction of harmonics produced by
Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) from the power
source. These extracted currents were sensed
through four strategically placed sensors on the load
side. The compensation currents were then
compared to the actual currents supplied by the VSI
at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC). Any
disparities detected were treated as error currents
and employed in the Fixed Hysteresis Control
Algorithm (HCA) to generate switching signals for
the VSI via Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor
(IGBT) switches.
3.3.2 Algorithm for Current Identification
Typically, the primary function of a Shunt Active
Power Filter (SAPF) involves filtering or
compensating for disturbances (harmonic, reactive,
unbalanced, etc.) originating from both linear and
non-linear loads on the electrical grid. The
identification method serves to calculate perturbing
currents that the Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) will
inject, via the output filter, into the Point of
Common Coupling (PCC) in a phase opposite to the
disturbance. Consequently, the electrical grid side is
maintained in a clean state, exhibiting sinusoidal
current and voltage patterns.
3.3.3 Review of the Instantaneous Reactive
Power Theory (PQ Theory)
The prevailing identification method, widely
adopted, is the instantaneous real and imaginary
powers approach, [3]. This technique presents the
benefit of simultaneously and precisely
compensating for harmonic currents, unbalanced
currents, and reactive power, either partially or
selectively. It achieves this accuracy swiftly and
with ease. It was implemented in 1983, [25]. They
introduced the "Generalized Theory of the
Instantaneous Reactive Power in Three-Phase
Circuits," commonly known as the instantaneous
power theory or PQ theory. This theory is based on
instantaneous values in three-phase power systems
with or without neutral wire, and can be applied to
steady-state or transitory operations with various
voltage and current waveforms. The PQ theory
involves transforming the three-phase voltages and
currents in the (a-b-c) coordinates to the -β-0)
coordinates using the Clarke transformation as
presented in equations (14) and (15), and then
calculating the PQ theory instantaneous power
components, [26].
The PQ theory's advantage is that it separates
the zero sequence components which do not
contribute to the alpha and beta components.
Therefore, it can be neglected in a balanced system.
Figure 8 represents the block diagram of the
proposed methodology.
Fig. 8: Block diagram of the PQ theory
0
11
122
2 3 3
0
3 2 2
111
222
a
b
c
ii
ii
ii









(14)
0
11
122
2 3 3
0
3 2 2
111
222
a
b
c
VV
VV
VV









(15)
The power components p and q are related to
the same α voltages and currents and can be
written together:
.
V V i
p
V V i
q



(16)
Where p0 = v0
i0 instantaneous zero-sequence
power. The harmonics component can be eliminated
by using a Low Pass Filter (LPF). After selecting
and eliminating the harmonic current, it is necessary
to apply the inverse of Clarke transformation
(Equation 17) to calculate the reference current in
the (a,b,c) frame.
( , , )
0
110
2
*
2 1 3
* * 1
3 2 2
*1 1 3
22
2
a
a b c b
c
cc
c c c
cc
ii
i i i
ii



 

 

 

 
 
 



(17)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
29
Volume 23, 2024
3.3.4 Advantage of the PQ theory in SAPF
The control of active filters can be achieved using
various methods, including the p-q theory. The p-q
theory has notable advantages such as being
inherently designed for three-phase systems,
regardless of their balance or unbalance, with or
without harmonic distortions in both voltages and
currents. Additionally, it relies on instantaneous
values, enabling a high level of dynamic response.
Furthermore, its computations are relatively
straightforward, utilizing only algebraic expressions
that can be implemented using standard processors.
Lastly, it offers two control strategies, namely
constant instantaneous supply power and sinusoidal
supply current. It is applicable for all industrial and
residential loads applications.
3.3.5 Conventional Fixed Hysteresis Band
The conventional hysteresis fixed band technique
employs two bands, namely the upper band and the
lower band represented by ∆+ and ∆-, respectively.
The modulated current is confined between these
two bands. When the error current approaches the
upper band ∆+, the upper IGBT switch , is
switched off while the lower switch is switched
on, and vice versa for the lower band -. This
ensures that the compensating current
tracks the reference current , this achieving
robustness and good dynamic performance
compared to other compensation methods. Figure
9(a) and Figure 9(b) illustrate the block diagram of
the conventional hysteresis control and the
waveform of the control signals for a single phase
(phase a). It is to be noted that the lower side of the
inverter is controlled by the same signal but with a
NOT logic gate.
a)
b)
Fig. 9: Block diagram of the constant hysteresis
modulation and their principle of generating control
signals
The fixed hysteresis band has certain
advantages, such as:
Simplicity: A fixed hysteresis band is
relatively simple to implement because it
does not require additional components such
as sensors or microcontrollers.
Quick Response: it can allow a quick
response of the filter in case of variation of
load or source conditions, which can improve
the quality of the output signal.
Low distortion: it can reduce signal
distortion by limiting variations in filter
resonance frequency.
Low cost: Fixed hysteresis band does not
require expensive components, which can
reduce the cost of manufacturing the filter.
However, it is important to note that these
benefits may vary depending on filter specifications
and operating conditions. Also, while this method
has some advantages, it has several disadvantages,
including:
Limited range Frequency: The fixed
hysteresis band is suitable for a limited
frequency range. If the source frequency
exceeds this range, the filter may not function
properly, which may cause signal distortion.
Sensitivity to temperature variations: The
properties of the electronic components that
make up the filter can vary with temperature
changes. This can result in the drift of
resonant frequencies and affect the accuracy
of the fixed hysteresis band.
Non-linear effects: The fixed hysteresis band
can also produce non-linear effects that can
alter the waveform of the output signal. These
non-linear effects may be due to interactions
between filter components or saturation of the
feedback circuit.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
30
Volume 23, 2024
As presented previously to improve the
performance, and mitigate the disadvantages
mentioned below we can use a PWM controller
instead of an HCC. But this is not the subject of this
paper.
3.4 Filters Selection
From previous experimental research carried out to
investigate the effect of harmonics generated by
CLFs at the side of the main. We can notice that at
lower harmonic frequencies, most waveforms have
a high percentage of harmonic distortion compared
to the harmonic frequency. Hence CFLs are
characterized by the high harmonic emission for low
and high harmonic order frequency, therefore, a
2nd-order high-pass filter is used to remove the
higher-order frequencies injected by CFL and by the
switched device of the APF, as shown in Figure 10.
So, that’s why in this research we interest only for
the 2nd order high-pass filter filters for high
harmonic current 21th to 49th) and the other
harmonics will be mitigated by the SAPF.
Fig. 10: Basic single-line diagram of a hybrid active
power filter topology based on a passive filter in
parallel with an active power filter
4 Simulations and Results
The studied shunt hybrid system is simulated using
Matlab/Simulink software, by using the Simscape
power system library toolbox. The load is
constituted of 75 equivalent models of 20W lamps
distributed over the 3 AC phases. A passive filter is
connected in parallel to attenuate the high harmonic
rank (from harmonic 21st). Also, a three-phase four-
wire SAPF with three legs and the ford leg
connected to a split capacitor (2C topologies) is
connected in parallel with the load. Table 2
summarizes the simulation parameters. The circuit
diagram of the full part of the HAPF is presented in
Figure 11. The passive filter is connected at
t=0.04s, and the HAPF is connected to PCC at time
instant t = 0.08 seconds.
Table 2. Power System Parameters.
Parameters
Symbol
Values
Grid
System
frequency
Fs
50 HZ
Source voltage
Vrms
230V
Source
resistance
Rs
2mΩ
Source
inductance
Ls
1mH
Passive
filter
PF capacitance
CPF
nF, µF
PF inductance
LPF
mH
PF resistance
RPF
4.7Ω
Shunt
active
power
filter
SAPF
Filter resistance
Rf
1mΩ
Filter
inductance
Lf
0.1µH
DC side
capacitance
C1, C2
2200µF
Reference
voltage
Vdc
600V
Fig. 11: Circuit diagram of a three-phase four-wire
HAPF with PQ and Hysteresis Controller
Where , , and are the
load currents before compensation, the
compensating current injected by the power device
(the SAPF), the source currents after compensation,
and the source voltage, respectively.
4.1 Simulation Result before Compensation
The simulated results of the source voltage
and currents waveforms before connecting
the PF and the APF to the system the three-line
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
31
Volume 23, 2024
system are presented in Figure 12(a) and Figure
12(b), respectively.
a)
b)
Fig. 12: Source voltage and current waveforms
before compensation
The current waveforms generated by CFLs
deviate from sinusoidal shapes across all three
phases and are not synchronized with the source
voltages. Furthermore, the neutral current is
different to zero. The harmonic spectrum of CFLs
presented in Figure 13 serves to encapsulate the
sources of these disruptions, highlighting the non-
linear behavior of the load. Essentially, this load
functions as a generator of notable harmonic
currents with , which have the
potential to propagate back to the distribution
source, thereby impacting other loads connected to
the same network. Also, it should be noted that all
simulated parameters are almost identical to the
experimental simulation carried out in [13]. Wish
means that the current waveforms of the real model
and the simulation model reproduce the same
waveforms and also the same FFT components.
Fig. 13: FFT components of the load current before
compensation
4.2 Performance of the Passive Filter
The passive filter is suggested for its simplicity,
cost-effectiveness, and dependable performance.
Utilizing system parameters and measured
harmonics. A 2nd order high-pass filter is used to
remove the higher-order frequencies injected by
CFLs and by the switched devices of the APF. After
connecting the PF at t=0.04s we can notice that the
THD is reduced from 90.75% to 71.22% (as
presented in Table 3); which means that the PF is
well designed for attenuated those high harmonic
orders frequency. However, the power quality still
contains the low harmonic frequency and noise, and
the full system is still outside the national and
international standards, [11], [12]. So, a force needs
an SAPF to attenuate others' harmonic rank. Wish is
implemented in the next section to make the source
current and voltage align with predefined
international standards.
Table 3. THD Percentage Comparison
THD without PF Filters
THD with PF Filter
90.75%
71.22%
Figure 14(a) and Figure 14(b), represent
respectively, the current waveforms of the
compensations current and the source current before
and after connecting the APF to the system at
t=0.08. Also, Figure 15 represents the source current
FFT after connecting the SHPF.
a)
b)
c)
Fig. 14: Current waveforms before and after
compensation at different points
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
32
Volume 23, 2024
a)
b)
Fig. 15: FFT components of the source current after
compensation (a) with APF, and (b) with HAPF
As shown in Figure 15(a) and Figure 14(a)
represent the FFT component and the current
waveforms of the CFLs before connecting the
SAPF, it can be noticed that the THD of the current
, and the THD of the voltage
. Moreover, Figure 14(a) and Figure
14(c) show that the system corresponds to a poor
factor due to the phase shift between the current and
voltage. According to the international, [11], [12],
standards, these results are outside of the allowed
limits and can cause harmful effects on the
distribution network. As result of this work, and
after connecting the SHPF at t=0.06s to the system,
it is clear from Figure 14(b) and Figure 14(c) that
the currents waveforms of the source ,
become almost sinusoidal, which attests that the
conventional algorithm used in this paper has
succeeded in compensating harmonic currents; by
injecting equal but opposite harmonic current to the
power network. In addition, the source currents and
voltage are in phase as presented in the same figure,
which results in obtaining a good power factor PF
close to 1. Figure 15(a) shows that the THD of the
current after compensation becomes equal to
1.75%, (a good reduction in THD is noticed) with a
APF and to 0.75% with a HAPF (Figure 15(b)).
Also, the fundamental current values for phase “a”
remain almost the same before and after connecting
the HAPF to the system where
and . This implies that the filter
injects only harmonic currents, while the network
injects only the fundamental component of the load
current.
4.3 Performance under Different Scenarios
To investigate and validate the performance of
conventional algorithms and the fixed hysteresis
controller, two distinct case studies have been
undertaken. This could involve essentially sudden
changes in the load part. Variations in source
voltage, or other external factors that might affect
system performance will be the case of another
future research anyways, these cases are outlined as
follows:
Case 1: Variable and Balanced Load of 100%
CFLs: In this scenario, a load of 99 Compact
Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs), with 33 lamps
connected per phase, is employed from t0=0s to
t2=0.14s. Subsequently, at t2=0.14s, the load is
doubled to 150 lamps, maintaining a balanced
distribution across the three phases.
Case 2: Unbalanced Load: This case involves an
unbalanced load configuration, with 75 lamps for
Phase A, 100 lamps for Phase B, and 120 lamps for
phase c.
Figure 16 and Figure 17 depict the current
waveforms of the Shunt Active Power Filter (SAPF)
both before and after compensation for Case 1 and
Case 2. Notably, the SAPF is activated at t1=0.04s
for Case 1, while Case 2 retains the same
configuration as previously established in the study.
These visual representations provide insights into
the SAPF's effectiveness in mitigating power quality
issues under varying load conditions, showcasing its
performance in both balanced and unbalanced load
scenarios.
Figure 16 displays simulation results with a
variable load of 100% CFLs. The SAPF effectively
adjusts to load variations, maintaining sinusoidal
source currents throughout load changes. The Total
Harmonic Distortion (THD) of the source decreases
from 89.66% to 2.18% with the connection of 99
lamps (from t1=0.04s to t2=0.14) and from 92.2% to
2.44% with 150 lamps connected (at t2=0.14s). The
fundamental currents for these configurations are
2.8A and 5.2A, respectively. Note that t0, t1, and t2
are arbitrarily chosen for this study.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
33
Volume 23, 2024
In Figure 17, the SAPF response to an unbalanced
load (75 lamps for Phase A, 100 lamps for Phase B,
and 120 lamps for Phase C) is presented. Although
the source currents are sinusoidal for each phase,
they are unfortunately not balanced with the simple
hysteresis controller. However, the THD is reduced
from 89% to 2.56% for Phase A, 90.3% to 2.67%
for Phase B, and 90.9% to 2.7% for phase c. The
fundamental currents for the three phases are 2.4 A,
2.6 A, and 2.8 A, respectively.
Fig. 16: Current waveforms before and after
compensation under case 1
Fig. 17: Current waveforms before and after
compensation under case 2
4.4 Performance under Different SAPF
Topologies:
In this section, we present the performance of the
shunt active power filter with three phase four wire
different active power filter topologies, respectively,
with the four legs topologies. With the four legs and
mid-point capacitor topologies and with 3 half-
bridge topologies presented in Figure 18(a), Figure
18(b) and Figure 18(c). These SAPF configurations
are widely employed to address power quality issues
in the grid or distribution medium, particularly in
higher power applications. Moreover, these
topologies can effectively mitigate issues related to
the duty cycle dv/dt of active switches.
Nevertheless, the primary drawbacks of these
configurations include a substantial number of
switching devices, intricate control techniques,
sizable physical dimensions, and elevated costs.
a)
b)
c)
Fig. 18: Bloc diagram of the SAPF connected to
distribution network a) with four legs topologies, b)
with four legs and mid-point capacitor topologies,
and c) with 3 half-bridge topologies
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
34
Volume 23, 2024
As known that The THD of the current before
compensation of the load is equal to 90.75%. After
connecting the SAPF with the 2C topology, the
THD is reduced to 1.75%. With the four legs
topologies the THD of the source current is
improved to 1.25% and with the 3H bridge topology
to 1%. However, the three applied topologies show
their good application of filtering the harmonic
currents generated by the non-linear load. Which
implies that the network contains only the
fundamental current.
SAPFs are used in power systems to mitigate
harmonics and improve power quality. They are
commonly employed in various industrial
applications to address issues related to distorted
power waveforms, reactive power, and harmonic
currents. We can note some industrial applications
of SAPFs such as Variable Frequency Drives,
Industrial Automation and Robotics, Data Centers,
Textile Industry, and Pharmaceutical and Chemical
Industries. By installing SAPFs in these and other
industrial and residential applications, companies
can enhance power quality, reduce energy losses,
and comply with regulatory standards related to
harmonics and power factor correction.
4.5 Future Research
It's crucial to note that although the HCA method
has numerous advantages, it is prone to chattering,
resulting in inconsistent switching frequencies,
which remained unresolved. To counter this issue, a
Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) controller must be
integrated into the system in place of HCA. This
PWM controller served to stabilize the switching
frequency and alleviate associated harmonic losses.
Also, despite all the advantages of the SHPF, the
DC bus of this filter uses a three-phase rectifier to
provide the power energy to the capacitors to
compensate for the reactive power generated by the
nonlinear loads, which can create other problems of
harmonics in case of highly non-linear loads. To
overcome this issue, a hybrid active power filter
HAPF powered up with a PV system to power the
DC bus can be suggested for future work. Also, to
further test the effectiveness and applicability of the
suggested filter, different algorithms and scenarios
including balanced and unbalanced nonlinear loads
must be investigated and studied.
Finally, the integration of Computational
Intelligence (CI) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)
methods, such as Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic,
Petri Nets, and Evolutionary Computing, into the
design of SAPF circuits in the context of PQ theory
and hysteresis controller presents an intriguing
avenue for enhancing performance and adaptability.
CI techniques have demonstrated effectiveness in
optimizing control strategies and mitigating power
quality issues in various applications. For instance,
neural networks have been employed for real-time
learning and adaptation in power systems, [27],
[28], while Petri nets and, fuzzy logic have shown
their success in nonlinear system control and for
multilevel inverter topology, they are offering
robustness in dealing with uncertainties inherent in
power electronics, [29], [30] and [31]. Evolutionary
computing, on the other hand, has proven valuable
in parameter tuning and optimization tasks in power
systems. By leveraging these CI methodologies, the
design of SAPF circuits could potentially benefit
from improved efficiency, adaptability, and
robustness, aligning with the current trends in power
electronics research. So, it is recommended to use
another intelligent control technique such as Petrie
net algorithms, or neuronal algorithms for the
current compensation calculation block. Wish is the
work of future research. We will take into account
the effect of the impedance of the cable even in
simulation mode, [32].
5 Conclusion
The focus of this study is on power quality indices
related to a residential power rectifier functioning as
a nonlinear load. The analysis delves into harmonic
distortions present in both the source current and
voltage, considering both total and individual
harmonic distortions. The measured values surpass
the thresholds established by international standards
for both current and voltage. To address and
overcome this issue a SHPF based on a passive filter
in parallel with an APF is designed and
implemented. The APF is controlled with the PQ
theory and a simple Hysteresis controller. Matlab
simulation results validate the effectiveness of the
proposed hybrid filter design, demonstrating an
improvement in source current and voltage to meet
the accepted levels specified by the international
standard.
Beyond those traditional methods, the synergy
between a hybrid active power filter powered up
with a PV system offers a compelling avenue for
harmonic mitigation, unlocking additional benefits
that deserve dedicated exploration in future studies.
Their control part will be suggested based on the
current trend of Computational Intelligence such as
Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic, or Intelligence
Artificial IA.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
35
Volume 23, 2024
Nomenclature:
Notation
Description
CFL
Compact Fluorescent Lamp
PF
Passive Filter
APF
Active Power Filter
SAPF
Shunt Active Power Filter
HAPF
Hybrid Active Power Filter
VSI
Voltage Source Inverter
THD
Total Harmonic Distortion
PCC
Point of Common Coupling
HCA
Hysteresis control algorithms
FFT
Fast Fourier Transform
PFC
Power Factor Correction
PQ
PQ theory
References:
[1] İ. Kıyak, B. Oral, and V. Topuz, “Smart
indoor LED lighting design powered by
hybrid renewable energy systems,” Energy
Build., vol. 148, pp. 342–347, 2017, doi:
10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.016.
[2] P. Verma, N. Patel, and N.-K. C. Nair, “Power
quality impacts during CFL to LED
transition,” in Australasian Universities
Power Engineering Conference
(AUPEC),Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2016,
pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/aupec.2016.7749339.
[3] K. Naftahi, A. Abouloifa, Z. Hekss, S.
Echalih, F. Ait Bellah, and I. Lachkar, “Three-
Phase Four-Wire Shunt Active Power Filter
Based on the Hybrid Automaton Control with
Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory,”
IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 532–
537, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.366.
[4] R. Arnold, “Solutions to the power quality
problem,” Power Eng. J., vol. 15, no. 2, pp.
65–73, 2001, doi: 10.1049/pe:20010202.
[5] A. Chebabhi, M. K. Fellah, A. Kessal, and M.
F. Benkhoris, “Comparative study of
reference currents and DC bus voltage control
for Three-Phase Four-Wire Four-Leg SAPF to
compensate harmonics and reactive power
with 3D SVM,” ISA Trans., vol. 57, pp. 360–
372, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2015.01.011.
[6] B. Deffaf, H. Farid, H. Benbouhenni, S.
Medjmadj, and N. Debdouche, “Synergetic
control for three-level voltage source inverter-
based shunt active power filter to improve
power quality,” Energy Reports, vol. 10, pp.
1013–1027, 2023, doi:
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.051.
[7] Z. Hekss, A. Abouloifa, I. Lachkar, F. Giri, S.
Echalih, and J. M. Guerrero, “Nonlinear
adaptive control design with average
performance analysis for photovoltaic system
based on half bridge shunt active power
filter,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol.
125, p. 106478, 2021, doi:
10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106478.
[8] B. Nagi Reddy, A. Pandian, O. Chandra
Sekhar, and M. Ramamoorty, “Performance
and dynamic analysis of single switch AC-DC
buck-boost buck converter,” Int. J. Innov.
Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 307–
313, 2019.
[9] Y. Ramachandra, M. Akhileshwar, A.
Pandian, R. Nalli, and K. Subbarao, “Analysis
of recent developments in brushless DC
motors controlling techniques,” Int. J. Innov.
Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 522–
526, 2019.
[10] A. H. Fahad and M. S. Reza, “Single-Phase
Shunt Active Power Filter Using Parabolic
PWM for Current Control,” in Proceedings of
the 7th International Conference on Smart
Energy Grid Engineering, SEGE,Oshawa,
ON, Canada, 2019, 2019, pp. 134–138. doi:
10.1109/SEGE.2019.8859868.
[11] GENELEC, Characteristics of the voltage
supplied by public distribution networks
“Caractéristiques de la tension fournie par
les réseaux publics de distribution”, EN 50
160, CLC/BTTF, vol. 68. 1994, p. 6.
[12] S. Emv, A. G. Corporate, and H. Nordstrasse,
“IEC 61000-3-2 Harmonics Standards
Overview,” Schaffner EMC Inc., Edsion, NJ,
USA, pp. 1–5, 2005, [Online].
http://www.teseq.tw/pdfinfo/05_AN_IEC6100
0-3-25.pdf (Accessed Date: March 29, 2024).
[13] H. Mohamed, N. Mohamed, and S. Lassaad,
“Experimental Investigations of a CFLs
Currents Harmonics Injection into an
Electrical Network Grid,” in 2021 4th
International Symposium on Advanced
Electrical and Communication Technologies,
ISAECT, Arabie Saoudi, 2021, IEEE, 2021,
pp. 1–5. doi:
10.1109/ISAECT53699.2021.9668434.
[14] Chauvin Arnoux, “Chauvin Arnoux
software.” [Online]. https://catalog.chauvin-
arnoux.com/fr_en/c-a-
8336.html?___from_store=fr_fr (Accessed
Date: March 8, 2023).
[15] Chauvin Arnoux Manyfactory,
“TECHNICAL DATA”, [Online].
https://www.chauvin-
arnoux.com/sites/default/files/HLHBXUP5.P
DF (Accessed Date: March 8, 2023).
[16] R. Bahrekazemi, “Assessment of Different
Compensation Strategies in Hybrid Active
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
36
Volume 23, 2024
Power Filters,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput.
Sci. Syst. Eng., pp. 34–39, 2013.
[17] S. R. Reddy, P. V Prasad, and G. N. Srinivas,
“Power Quality Improvement on 11kV/440V
Distribution System using DSTATCOM,” Int.
J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 6, pp. 17–26,
2024.
[18] E. Kazemi-Robati and M. S. Sepasian,
“Passive harmonic filter planning considering
daily load variations and distribution system
reconfiguration,” Electr. Power Syst. Res.,
vol. 166, pp. 125–135, 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.epsr.2018.09.019.
[19] M. M. Swamy, G. R. Bisel, and S. L. Rossiter,
“Passive harmonic filter system for variable
frequency drives.” Google Patents, 1995.
[20] A. B. Nassif, W. Xu, and W. Freitas, “An
investigation on the selection of filter
topologies for passive filter applications,”
IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 24, no. 3, pp.
1710–1718, 2009.
[21] A. K. Mishra, P. K. Nanda, D. Das, A. K.
Patra, N. Nahak, and L. M. Sathapathy,
“Design and Analysis of Shunt Passive Filter
for Harmonic and Reactive Power
Compensation,” in 2023 International
Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and
Information Technology, APSIT, India, 2023,
2023, pp. 347–352. doi:
10.1109/APSIT58554.2023.10201759.
[22] F. Zaro, “Power Quality Improvement using
Shunt Active Power Filter: An Industrial Zone
Case Study,” WSEAS Transactions on Power
Systems, vol. 18, pp. 179-185, 2023, doi:
10.37394/232016.2023.18.19.
[23] F. Zaro, “Shunt Active Power Filter for Power
Quality Improvement of Renewable Energy
Systems: A Case Study,” WSEAS
Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 18, no.
14, pp. 241-247, 2023, doi:
10.37394/232016.2023.18.25.
[24] A. Bouhouta, S. Moulahoum, N. Kabache, A.
Moualdia, and I. Colak, “Harmonics
Compensation of Grid-Connected PV Systems
Using a Novel M5P Model Tree Control,” in
11th International Conference on Smart Grid,
icSmartGrid,Parie France, 2023, 2023, pp. 1–
6. doi:
10.1109/icSmartGrid58556.2023.10170901.
[25] A. M. Sharaf, F. H. Gandoman, and B. Khaki,
“Active harmonic filters,” Power Qual. Futur.
Electr. Power Syst., vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 131–
163, 2017, doi: 10.1049/pbpo092e_ch4.
[26] O. T. Ibitoye, M. O. Onibonoje, and J. O.
Dada, “Analysis of Power Quality and
Technical Challenges in Grid-Tied Renewable
Energy,” WSEAS Transactions on Power
Systems, vol. 18, no. 608, pp. 248–258, 2023,
doi: 10.37394/232016.2023.18.26.
[27] Q. Jin, Z. Yao, and M. Guo, “A Control
Method of Shunt Active Power Filter for
System-wide Harmonic Suppression Based on
Complex-valued Neural Network,” in 2020
IEEE 9th International Power Electronics and
Motion Control Conference, IPEMC ECCE
Asia,Nanjing, China,2020, 2020, pp. 1543–
1548. doi: 10.1109/IPEMC-
ECCEAsia48364.2020.9368080.
[28] A. Y. Hatata, M. Eladawy, and K. Shebl,
“Parameter control scheme for active power
filter based on NARX neural network,”
WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, vol.
13, no. Pt 1, pp. 118–124, 2018.
[29] P. P. Behera, D. A. Gadanayak, R. R.
Panigrahi, and M. Mishra, “A Mamdani Type
Fuzzy Controller with Mathematical
Morphology for Shunt Active Power Filters,”
in 2023 1st International Conference on
Circuits, Power, and Intelligent Systems,
CCPIS,Bhubaneswar, India, 2023, 2023, pp.
1–5. doi:
10.1109/CCPIS59145.2023.10291823.
[30] S. Othman, M. A. Alali, L. Sbita, J. P. Barbot,
and M. Ghanes, “Modeling and control design
based on petri nets tool for a serial three-phase
five-level multicellular inverter used as a
shunt active power filter,” Energies, vol. 14,
no. 17, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14175335.
[31] S. Othman, J. P. Barbot, L. Sbita, M. A. Alali,
M. Ghanes, and A. Fekik, “Hybrid renewable
energy system based on Petri nets control for
a single-phase flying capacitor multilevel
DC–AC converter,” in Power Electronics
Converters and their Control for Renewable
Energy Applications, A. Fekik, M. Ghanes,
and H. Denoun, Eds., Academic Press, 2023,
pp. 145–166. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-
91941-8.00007-X.
[32] M. N. Iqbal, L. Kutt, B. Asad, and N. Shabbir,
“Impact of cable impedance on the harmonic
emission of LED lamps,” in Proceedings -
2020 21st International Scientific Conference
on Electric Power Engineering, EPE, Prague,
Czech Republic, 2020, 2020, pp. 1–5. doi:
10.1109/EPE51172.2020.9269271.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
37
Volume 23, 2024
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed to the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2024.23.3
Mohamed Hajjej, Lassaad Sbita
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
38
Volume 23, 2024