infrastructure such as bridges be conducted
continuously.
Monitoring and structural diagnostics are
particularly topical issues as techniques that can be
usefully adopted for safety assessment and more
generally for the proper management of existing
constructions. In fact, monitoring overlaps with
structural diagnostics activities with the aim of
checking the behavior of constructions over time,
with longer observation periods, even of several
years, aimed at controlling the evolution of certain
aspects of interest, such as, for example, the
presence of some structural damage or form of
degradation, or the existence and entity of cracking
frameworks. By verifying their possible evolution
over time, monitoring provides overall feedback
with which to ascertain the change in structural
characteristics, which may be indicative of a
significant increase in structural damage.
With reference to a case study, an experimental
and automated methodology capable of acquiring
geometric information and the state of degradation
of a bridge in Cardeto was presented.
This information, available on the visualization
platform, helps and enables the Authority to
determine the priority of maintenance interventions.
Acknowledgements:
We would like to thank MTC for their willingness
to experiment.
References:
[1] P. Chupanit and C. Phromsorn, The importance
of bridge health monitoring, International
Science Index, vol. 6, pp. 135–138, 2012.View
at: Google Scholar
[2] Y. Fujino and D. M. Siringoringo, “Bridge
monitoring in Japan: the needs and strategies,”
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol.
7, no. 7-8, pp. 597–611, 2011.
[3] S. L. Davis and D. Goldberg, The Fix We're In
For: The State of Our Nation's Bridges 2013,
Transportation for America, Washington, DC,
USA, 2013.
[4] A. Žnidarič, V. Pakrashi, E. O'Brien, and A.
O'Connor, A review of road structure data in
six European countries, Proceedings of the
ICE: Urban Design and Planning, vol. 164, no.
4, pp. 225–232, 2011.
[5] R., Pucinotti, G., Fiordaliso, Multi-span steel–
concrete bridges with anti-seismic devices: A
case study, Frontiers in Built Environment,
2019.
[6] A. Bonelli, O.S. Bursi, R. Ceravolo, S. Santini,
N. Tondini, A. Zasso, Dynamic Identification
and Structural Health Monitoring of a Twin
Deck Curved Cable-Stayed Footbridge: The
“Ponte del Mare” of Pescara in Italy, Fifth
European Workshop on Structural Health
Monitoring, 2010.
[7] X. Q. Zhu and S. S. Law, Wavelet-based crack
identification of bridge beam from operational
deflection time history, International Journal
of Solids and Structures, vol. 43, no. 7-8, pp.
2299–2317, 2006.
[8] A. K. Pandey, M. Biswas, and M. M. Samman,
Damage detection from changes in curvature
mode shapes, Journal of Sound and Vibration,
vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 321–332, 1991.
[9] G. Lederman, Z. Wang, J. Bielak et al.,
Damage quantification and localization
algorithms for indirect SHM of bridges, in
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and
Life Extension, chapter 83, pp. 640–647, CRC
Press, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
[10] A., Fotia, M.R., Alvaro, F., Oliveto, R.,
Pucinotti, Safety Management of Existing
Bridges: A Case Study . Lecture Notes in
Networks and Systems, 2022, 482 LNNS, pp.
2268–2277.
[11] T.-C. Huynh, J.-H. Park, H.-J. Jung, and J.-T.
Kim, Quasi-autonomous bolt-loosening
detection method using vision-based deep
learning and image processing, Automation in
Construction, vol. 105, article 102844, 2019.
[12] X. F. Zhao, Y. Zhang, and N. N. Wang, Bolt
loosening angle detection technology using
deep learning, Structural Control & Health
Monitoring, vol. 26, no. 1, article e2292, 2019.
[13] C. Y. Wang, N. Wang, S. C. Ho, X. M. Chen,
and G. B. Song, Design of a new vision-based
method for the bolts looseness detection in
flange connections, IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1366–
1375, 2020.
[14] S. H. Chen, F. Cerda, P. Rizzo, J. Bielak, J. H.
Garrett, and J. Kovacevic, Semi-supervised
multiresolution classification using adaptive
graph filtering with application to indirect
bridge structural health monitoring, IEEE
Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 62, pp.
2879–2893, 2014.
[15] Barrile, V., Fotia, A., Leonardi, G., Pucinotti,
R. Geomatics and soft computing techniques
for infrastructural monitoring. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 2020, 12(4), 1606
[16] Barrile, V., Bilotta, G., Fotia, A., Bernardo, E.
Road Extraction for Emergencies from Satellite
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.25
Antonino Fotia, Raffaele Pucinotti,
Vincenzo Barrile