Design and Performance Analysis of MIMO Patch Antenna using
Superstrate for Minimization of Mutual Coupling
Abstract: - Antennas play a critical role in wireless communications. Where the existing design focuses only on
frequency reconfiguration, but it does not take advantage of the entire frequency and power spectrum.
Therefore, the honeycomb-shaped Metamaterial cells used in the suggested antenna design serve as a
superstrate for microstrip patch antennas with an extensive range of actual negative permittivity and
permeability, as well as a refractive index feature. Also, to reduce mutual coupling in current printed and other
antennas. The superstrate microstrip antenna which is based on metamaterial through RF MEMS Varactor
diode switching is proposed in this paper. Based on a microstrip antenna, metamaterials in the shape of circular
and hexagonal arrays are employed as the superstrate. Also, the superstrate layers serve as a random, providing
strength to the entire structure while also improving other antenna metrics such as gain and bandwidth. The
design outputs for several metamaterial superstrates in terms of gain, reflection coefficient (S11), and band-
width are evaluated based developed model and compared with existing works after the addition of varactor
diode switches to the proposed superstrate, which also allows for frequency reconfiguration. As a result, the
suggested antenna was designed to reduce mutual coupling and improve system performance in 5G technology,
specifically in mm-wave applications. The obtained results for metamaterial superstrate designs demonstrate
high bandwidth and gain behaviour.
Key-Words: - Metamaterial, Superstrate, Patch, Gain, Bandwidth, Frequency, Mutual coupling
Received: July 9, 2021. Revised: May 13, 2022. Accepted: June 8, 2022. Published: July 4, 2022.
1 Introduction
With the rapid advancement of 5G technologies
used in wireless communication systems and has
huge demand in terms of performance levels in
terms of high throughput and low latency for mobile
communications apps and primarily consist of
extremely high data rates. 5G is a next-generation
telecommunications technology that will enable the
rate at which the packet transmits in the range of
10Mbps to 10Bbps [1, 2]. Microwave refers to ultra-
high frequency (UHF) frequencies ranging from 300
MHz to 3000 MHz as well as extremely high
frequency (EHF) frequencies ranging between 30
GHz to 300 GHz. In general, both licensed
authorized and unauthorized microwave bands are
frequently operating in both bands such as super-
high frequency (SHF) and extra-high frequency
(EHF) bands, with frequencies ranging from 3 GHz
to 30 GHz. The signal will typically travel at a low
frequency. As a result, lower frequency throughput
suffers, and vice versa. Another current advantage
of the network's high density is that it will change
the old network layout from cells that are formed as
groups of more cells and covering more distances to
more number of cells that are small that provide
increased bandwidth and channel capacity while
reducing power transmitted as they change to
millimeter waves. The mm-Wave is an important
feature of 5G systems and its role in systems that are
related to cellular services for users [3][4]. [5] [6]
propose mm-Wave for 5G cellular communication,
whereas [7] [8] provide propagation models for 5G
mm-Wave communication. Although the EHF range
in the electromagnetic spectrum is suffering
underutilized for wireless systems, still some
communication systems are in the investigation for
point to point, short-range and point to multipoint
communication systems. High bandwidth and data
rates, yet due to signal blockage and attenuation,
these high frequencies will place limits on this
1PALLAVI H. V., 2A. P. JAGADEESH CHANDRA, 3PARAMESHA
1Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Government Engineering
College, Hassan, Karnataka, 573202, INDIA
2Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Adichunchanagiri Institute of
Technology, Chikkamagaluru, Karnataka, INDIA
3Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Central University of
Karnataka, Kalburgi, INDIA
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
142
Volume 21, 2022
system. Thus, certain antennas, such as MIMO
antennas, have been necessary for communication
standards because they allow broadcast signal
characteristics to be adjusted to match millimeter-
wave[9]. 5G is a cutting-edge wireless system that
was widely used in or before the 2020 years. The
MIMO antenna system, which can give 9-99 times
more than 4G and LTE systems in terms of
bandwidth [10], is a critical component of 5G
technology. High-speed data transmission that is
combined through spectrum management via many
antennas on a single physical substrate is a relatively
latest demand in the recent wireless system. MIMO
technology achieves this purpose by utilizing
diversity gain to improve link reliability, data
throughput, capacity, and range that are not possible
achievable in a single-antenna system [11]. In terms
of channel capacity, MIMO technology outperforms
SIMO or MISO, but it has some drawbacks in terms
of antenna correlation and space efficiency [12].
One of the most promising 5G technologies is multi-
input and multi-output (MIMO). MIMO technology,
which has been extensively investigated, can
improve data transmission speed and give resistance
to multiple paths fading. In a MIMO system, the
transmitter or receiver must have two or more
antenna elements [13]. The planned MIMO antenna,
like certain designs [15], must inevitably produce
adequate features for the future, and one of the
critical variables is gain. However, because of
design size constraints, numerous elements are
positioned close together, generating mutual
coupling and lowering the MIMO antenna's
diversity performance [16]. Different decoupling
procedures are studied and reported in the latest
survey to minimize any effect of reciprocal
coupling. Some parameters like parasitic which are
etched, rings which are split resonators, bandgap
electromagnetic strut, ure, and defective structures
can all be employed to lessen mutual coupling in 5G
antenna are designed using MIMO technology. To
minimize mutual coupling, metamaterials are
utilized and discussed in [17].
In MIMO antennas, the main effect coupling is
mutual which is discussed in [18, 19,
20].Decoupling methods include defected ground
structure (DGS) [21], parasitic element [22],
electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) [23]-[25],
neutralization line [26], asymmetric coplanar wall
[27], optimization of topology [28], array-antenna
decoupling surface (ADS) [29], decoupling ground
[30], near-field resonator [31], polarization diversity
[32], split ring resonator (SRR)All of the above-
mentioned measures can successfully reduce mutual
coupling. However, the vast majority of coupling
has a limited coupling system that had a two-port
antenna. To overcome the limitation of massive
antenna coupling, a novel design must be
developed.
The contribution of this paper,
To reduce mutual coupling, Metamaterial
Superstrate-based Micro Strip Patch Antenna is
used.
To limit wave propagation, circular or hexagonal
shape metamaterial cells are designed.
Adding varactor diode switches to the metamaterial
superstrate for frequency reconfiguration.
The MIMO antenna is provided to boost
performance and provide strong isolation.
The rest of the work in this article is organized as
below discussions: In 2nd subsection examines
recent literature; Section 3 provides a detailed
description of the suggested methodology; Section 4
reviews implementation outcomes; and Section 5
ends the article. Finally, all simulations were carried
out using ANSYS HFSS.
2 Literature Survey
T. S. Rappaport, et al. [42] Recent advancements in
millimeter-wave frequencies are being driven by
increased demand for more throughput rate of data
transmission over short distances multimedia users.
Therefore, the best solution for enabling high-speed
data in terms of Gbit/seconds in communications is
deployment and discussed in [13] of wireless
communications which will be operating at mm-
wave frequencies. 8 Very broad bandwidths are
available at those frequencies, and these bands are
used in high throughput systems in wireless.
In [43] The antenna structure is physically modest
because of the 60 GHz frequency and 5 mm free-
space wavelength. High data rates can be achieved
while avoiding co-channel interference thanks to the
availability of 9 GHz bandwidth in the 60 GHz
range. Although there are huge free-space losses at
this frequency, big free-space losses 2 can be
compensated for by using a high-gain antenna array.
In the case of indoor radio communications, a
human barrier can have a significant impact on the
radio channel. To address this issue, high-gain
antennas with beam directing capabilities are
required.
Thummaluru, et.al [44] To achieve isolation greater
than 15 dB, a mu negative meta-material was used
in a band-stop filter and designed for two monopole
antennas which used 0.16 edge separations, the
limitation of these designs is the split concept used
in ground plane and for matching, the series stub is
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
143
Volume 21, 2022
utilized and these are additional effects and not
suitable in real-time applications. Jafargholi et al.
[45] showed that a CLL-MTM superstrate is a
suitable instrument for attenuating surface waves in
antennae which are used in patch arrays the
superstrates are based on CLCLL-MTM’she ability
to build autonomously arrays its is based on the
planar antenna is a key advantage. This method,
however, is ineffective for larger patch array
antennas. Jiang, et al [46] offers a new meta-surface
superstrate for decoupling massive antenna arrays It
should be emphasized that achieving high isolation
of a two-port antenna is a rather simple process.
However, establishing high isolation for larger
arrays is a tough process due to mutual interactions
between inner and outer array components making
total decoupling difficult. Parchin, et. al [47]
presented the smartphones that are based on 5G and
4G architectures which are designed using array-
based multi-band slot antenna. The proposed design
has a square ring that double-element slot radiators
and is subjected to microstrip structures and allows
for easy integration of RF and microwave circuits.
Yang, et. Ojaroudi al [48] proposed FR4 based
printed substrate of a thickness of 0.8mm which is
connected by a coaxial wire, which can provide
three-wide operational bandwidths for 5G
technologies uses: 32883613 MHz and 15962837
MHz.
Desai et.al [49] a new dual branch multiband tiny
slotted antenna tis are used in the broadcasting of
digital devices, Wi-Fi, and sub-6 GHz 5G networks.
At (750790 MHz), the antenna possesses
multiband characteristics. Patel, et al [50] square
microstrip-based patch multiband antenna is
proposed and it uses metamaterial and
metamaterials have qualitatively new
electromagnetic response functionalities are not
exiting in present communication networks. The
integration of antennae is easily present
simultaneously at different frequencies. Chouhan,
et al [51] Proposes a MIMO system that is based on
a spider-shaped fractal that is used WLAN,
WiMAX, Wi-Fi, C, and Bluetooth technologies. It
consists of two fourth-generation microstrip line-fed
antenna elements and two Y-shaped backplane
structures linked to a shared half rectangular ground
plane. Addepalli, et al [52] It is built with a
hexagonal MIMO patch antenna. It comprises S-
band (2-4 GHz), 2400-2480 MHz & 5150-5350
MHz used in WLAN, 3.1-10.6 GHz used in UWB,
and X band used for 8-12 GHz. Gao, et al. [53] The
antenna is composed of two modified coplanar
waveguides (CPWs) that feed staircase-shaped
radiating components for orthogonal radiation
patterns, with a 45° rectangular stub between the
CPWs to ensure excellent isolation. Kavitha, et al.
[54] The Metamaterial Superstrate Antenna
considerably contributes to the antenna's gain. The
primary purpose of this research is to improve the
gain and directivity of the Metamaterial Microstrip
Patch Antenna used in Wireless Point-to-Point
Communication applications like Dedicated Short-
Range Communications (DSRC). Nazl, et al. [55]
For 5G applications, a novel patch antenna for
wideband antenna design in the sub-6 GHz range is
being developed. The CST software was used to
build and simulate the wideband antenna for the
frequency band between 3.5 to 5 GHz. The antenna
material is made up of Rogers RT5880 as a
substrate with a thickness of 0.254 mm and a
dielectric constant of 2.20, as well as copper
material for the ground and patch of the antenna.
Lee, et al. [56] In a MIMO-based antenna, the
characters are separated into two radiating features
and these are magnified using an SRR array
structure. Where the designed antenna met under
return loss of 10 dB condition in the Mobile-
WiMAX frequency band. Two antenna elements are
separated by 0.1mm. However, the antenna's
performance has not been precisely assessed [42]
The antenna [44] covers the 1.343.92 GHz and
4.346.34 GHz wideband frequency bands, and the
two antenna elements are separated by 0.1mm.
However, the antenna's performance has not been
precisely assessed. [43] A human blockage on an
indoor radio link could have a substantial influence
on the radio channel. The research studies indicated
a split in the ground plane as well as an additional
series stub for matching, both of which are
impractical [46]. It is difficult to obtain high
isolation for larger arrays because mutual
interactions between inner and outer array members
make overall decoupling difficult [47], hence a
novel method is required to deal with massive
MIMO patch antenna arrays for 5G technology.
3 Metamaterial Superstrate based
Micro Strip Patch Antenna
In superstrate, microstrip has a highgraded-index
along with free space and it will reduce quality
factor with sufficient dielectric resonator. The high
dielectric material will reduce the size and slot
significantly. MIMO patch antennas are frequently
employed, making reciprocal coupling inevitable.
Mutual coupling can generate excessive side lobes,
gain decrease, and a huge voltage standing wave
ratio (VSWR). A significant amount of scientific
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
144
Volume 21, 2022
effort has been spent on mutual coupling reductions
over the previous few decades. But the existing
work that has been suggested for the MIMO antenna
arrays is not focused on the MIMO microstrip patch
antenna system. To solve the aforementioned
difficulties, a novel Metamaterial Superstrate-based
Micro Strip Patch Antenna with reduced mutual
coupling has been created to improve the antenna
system's performance, as shown in figure 1.
The metamaterial cells employed in the suggested
antenna design have the cell shape of a honeycomb
and are used as a superstrate based on microstrip
patch antennas with a wide range of effective
negative permittivity and permeability, as well as a
refractive index property, in the suggested
framework. The frequency reconfiguration was
accomplished by incorporating RF MEMS Varactor
diode switches into the Metamaterial Superstrate. In
addition, the MIMO antenna includes a 2 mm
separation between antenna parts, which provides
excellent isolation. As a result, the suggested
antenna was developed to reduce mutual coupling
and thereby improve system performance in 5G
technology, particularly in mm-wave applications.
3.1 Estimation of the Design
A high-frequency structure simulator is used to
analyze the performance of the suggested antenna
structure (HFSS). The suggested structure is studied
utilizing a variety of geometries, including
microstrip patch antennas (MPAs), superstrate
microstrip patch antennas (SMPAs), circles, and
hexagonal array metamaterial. Consequently, the
Roger RT Duroid 5880 Substrate and FR4
Metamaterial Superstrate with split ring resonator
(SRR) were used in this research. The Metamaterial
is utilized as a Superstrate, together with an array of
patches, to boost the antenna gain and directivity.
Also, a novel foraging and navigation optimization
technique have been suggested to optimize antenna
characteristics such as frequency, bandwidth, and
beamwidth as shown in Fig1. The antenna
parameters are selected optimally with the help of
tuning the metamaterial superstrate permeability and
permittivity values.
The steps that are involved in estimating a design.
Step 1: Set the resonant frequency, and
then calculate a single patch.
Step2: Maintain a
spacing between the patches
and insert a honeycomb structure.
Step3: Measure the patch width with help eq (1)
󰇛󰇜
(1)
where,



.
Step4: Calculate the length of the patch using eq.
(2). = (2)
Where is the actual length of the patch?
is the length of the patch generated as a result
of the electrical distribution over the
antenna?
Step 5: Derive by using the following equations.

 (3)
󰇡
󰇢
󰇛󰇜󰇛󰇡
󰇢 (4)
where h be the substrate thickness
 be the effective dielectric constant.
Step 6: Derive h by applying the following equations.
 



(5)
Step 7: Estimate the extent of the substrate.
 (6)
Where is the length of the substrate?
Step 8: Calculate substrate width by applying the
following equation.
 (7)
Where denotes the width of the substrate. The
ground plane's length and breadth are assumed to be
the same as the substrate's length and width to
improve performance.
Step 9: To calculate the length of the microstrip feed
line, use the following equation.
(8)
where is the microstrip feedline
be the guided wavelength
Step 10: Calculate and by executing the below
equations.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
145
Volume 21, 2022
 (9)
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the suggested framework
Here, is signified as the wavelength, and it is
considered using the equation provided below.
(10)
Step 11: Apply the following calculation to get the
feed line width.

󰇛
 󰇜 (11)
Where is the width of the feed line?
be the impedance value, t be the trace thickness.
Based on the known equation, the subsequent values
are calculated.
Table 1. MIMO Patch antenna parameters
3.1.1 MIMO Antenna Performance and
Proposed Meta-Material
The proposed MIMO-based antenna array based on
the structure of metamaterial and its development is
shown in Fig.1. The substrate which is FR-4 with
relative permittivity of 3.9, 0.02 loss in tangent, and
1.7mm thickness designs are the main objectives of
this work. MIMO antenna is 20x 16x12 mm3 in
total. Four patch antennas with 50-Ohm coaxial
feeding and a 2mm edge-to-edge antenna element
distance comprise the MIMO antenna array. For
minimization of mutual coupling, the metamaterial
is integrated with the MIMO antenna and originates
to be composed of four identical antennae which are
based on the patch design edged by coaxial lines,
with two metamaterial cells implanted in the FR-4
substrate to increase the MIMO antenna which is
isolated. As a result, the slots are cut into the
metamaterial's surface and their performance is
assessed. Increasing the size of the antenna will
significantly boost the gain. Hence, the suggested
MIMO antenna and meta-material are optimized
with help of HFSS and its parameter metrics. The
MIMO antenna is analyzed and depicted in Fig.2 to
acquire a better thought of the consequences of the
suggested meta-material cells. Currents flow from
one antenna patch to the next. Whenever presented
3-D metamaterial structure is integrated, the antenna
induces very small surface currents. As a result, of a
significant current flow on the 3-D structure of
Metamaterial, the surface current is limited and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
146
Volume 21, 2022
reduces the mutual coupling of the closed MIMO
antenna.
Fig. 2: Circular and hexagonal slot antennas are
printed on an FR4 substrate.
Where, the impacts of the key parameters,
impedance bandwidth, and MIMO antenna isolation
on S11 and S21 are next demonstrated. The MIMO
antenna's operating band is found to be max
constant and isolated in terms of S12 being
increased. The resonance frequency of a
metamaterial is used to compute the split-ring
resonator.
(12)
Scattering parameters are used to examine the
antenna structure metamaterial property (S-
Parameter). The reflectance (S11) and transmittance
(S21) characteristics are used to compute the
refractive index (n) and impedance (z), as shown in
the equation below.

󰇟
󰇛

󰇜󰇠(13)
󰇡

󰇢


󰇜 (14)
(15)

(16)
where q denotes the refractive index, d the substrate
height, and j the is wave vector. The substrate wave
impedance is z, the permittivity is, and the
permeability is. The antenna's resonance
frequency, return loss, radiation pattern, and VSWR
are all modeled. Copper, with a thickness of 1.6
mm, is used for the metamaterial elements, ground
layer, and patch.
Fig. 3: Depicts a side view of the proposed antenna
structure.
Fig.3 illustrates the proposed antenna from the side.
Consequently, the projected antenna is powered via
coaxial feed. ROGERS RT Duroid 5880 creates 1.6
mm thick substrates and metamaterial are positioned
at the top of each superstrate. The circle
metamaterial element has a diameter of 2 mm.
Fig. 4: Microstrip patch with the suggested antenna
structure
Using varactor diode switching, a microstrip patch
antenna with a circle and hexagonal array
metamaterial superstrate is developed. A superstrate
microstrip patch antenna, on the additional hand,
increases gain and bandwidth as shown in Fig.4.
c=cp
pF
L1
Term
Z=52
ohm
P1
Num
=1
Diod
e
P2
Num
=2
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
147
Volume 21, 2022
Fig. 5: Varactor diode equivalent circuit
The frequency ranges can be reconfigured with the
use of a reconfigurable antenna. Consequently, the
varactor diode is used in the reconfigurable antenna
to accelerate the speed of frequency tuning. This
diode is critical in a reconfigurable antenna. Where
variable capacitor formation is based on its varying
capacitance value, the reverse bias voltage changes,
and so does the antenna's frequency at which it is
operating, junction capacitance, and current
distribution. Figure 5 depicts the varactor diode
equivalent circuit. Tuning the varactor diode in the
proposed antenna design affects the capacitance of
the diode, which changes the antenna current
distribution. Also, it is re-configured for various
frequencies. The varactor capacitance can only be
accustomed within a definite range. To optimize
antenna properties such as frequency, bandwidth,
and beam width, a novel foraging, and navigation
optimization algorithm has been given. Hence, the
antenna parameters are optimized by altering the
metamaterial superstrate permeability and
permittivity values.
Fig. 6: 3D view of circle and Hexagonal shaped
metamaterial with superstrate antenna(Complete
Antenna structure)
Fig.6 depicts a suggested superstrate antenna system
with a three-dimensional array of circular and
hexagonal-shaped metamaterial elements. The
results are also contrasted with a previously
published design. Our proposed architecture, which
employs a metamaterial superstrate, achieves the
highest gain with the least mutual coupling.
4 Results and Discussion
This section includes a comprehensive description
of the implementation findings, as well as the
performance of our proposed framework, as well as
a comparative analysis to guarantee that our
suggested framework outperforms the existing
approaches in the metamaterial superstrate.
4.1 Specification of Software
The proposed design is fabricated using HFSS
which is Ansys software and is a recent technology
and widely used for electromagnetic structures
solver. It's one of several industry tools for antenna
design and RF electronic circuits are more
sophisticated and developed recently for MIMO
antenna designed for filtering, packaging, and also
for transmission lines.
4.2 Simulation Results and Performance
Evaluation
The Circular and Hexagonal MIMO patch array for
5G Technology with reduced Mutual Coupling
using Metamaterial Superstrate results are discussed
in this section. Each design is illustrated
individually, and the output is provided.
Fig. 7: HFSS software is utilized to design.
Fig.7 displays the design of a microstrip patch
antenna, and the length and width of the antenna are
determined based on the frequency employed, in
this instance millimeter-wave frequency.
Fig. 8: A return loss of -19.2dB is measured at a
resonance frequency of 29GHz.
0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00
Freq [GHz]
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
dB(S(1,1))
HFSSDesign1
XY Plot 7
Curve Info
dB(S(1,1))
Setup1 : Sweep
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
148
Volume 21, 2022
At a resonant frequency of 29 GHz of -19.2dB
return loss is produced. This shift occurs as a result
of the metamaterial layer property, which allows us
to reduce the antenna size are shown in Fig 8. It is
also a measure of the mismatch between the load
and the transmission line. As the impedance
mismatch rises. VSWR in a standing wave is
formulated between the ratio of the maximum
voltage and the minimum voltage. Hence, 

is a formula for calculating the VSWR.
Fig. 9: VSWR Vs Frequency
As shown in the graph Fig.9, the VSWR value is
1.9dB. This could have a significant impact on
antenna gain. The return loss is investigated using
scattering (S) parameters. Return loss is the signal
power loss due to impedance mismatching. A high
VSWR denotes a higher return loss. The return loss
plot or VSWR can also be used to calculate
bandwidth.
Fig. 10: Gain for circle and Hexagonal shaped
metamaterial with superstrate antenna
Gain is among the realized quantities in antenna
theory. Where the advantage is lower than in the
typical case of directivity. There are ohmic and
other losses presented. The act of transforming input
power into radio waves in a certain direction is
known as gain. The simulated maximum gain of a
full antenna is 3.73 dB, as illustrated in Fig10.
Fig. 11: MIMO antenna impedance bandwidth and
mutual coupling
The 3-D metamaterial cells anticipated are then
integrated into the manufactured element MIMO
antenna array. The HFSS is used to compare the
simulation results of the MIMO antenna with and
without the recommended meta-material in Fig. 11.
The proposed MIMO antenna has a bandwidth of
around 33.4MHz, as can be shown and the MIMO
resonance frequency is almost the same. However,
as compared to a MIMO antenna without the
proposed 3-D metamaterial cells, the antenna with
proposed meta-material cells has a -18 dB with
mutual coupling. That is, the projected MIMO
antenna with 3D metamaterial cells considerably
enhances isolation while reducing mutual coupling.
4.3 Comparison Analysis
This section describes the simulation outputs of the
proposed framework as well as the comparative
analysis.
Fig. 12: Different iteration Vs Permittivity
Permittivity is a measure of how easily charges
align in the presence of an electric field (polarize).
Higher permittivity implies greater resistance to the
production of an electric field and slower
disturbance propagation in the medium. Fig.12
shows how the permittivity falls as the iteration
number increases.
0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00
Freq [GHz]
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
dB(VSWR(1))
HFSSDesign1
XY Plot 2
Curve Info
dB(VSWR(1))
Setup1 : Sweep
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
149
Volume 21, 2022
Fig. 13: Return loss(dB)
Fig.13. and Table 2 depict the comparative study of
the return loss with the existing techniques [54-56].
The return loss of the suggested technique achieves
-19.2 dB, which is -9.2dB higher than the [55] and -
6 dB higher than the [54].
Table 2. Comparison of Return loss (dB)
Ref.
Technique used
Return loss
[54]
Metamaterial
Superstrate Antenna
with Modified Slot
Size in Uniform
Structure.
-13.15dB
[55]
Wideband antenna
design
-10dB
[56]
MIMO antenna
10dB
Proposed
MIMO patch
antenna array using
metamaterial
superstrate.
-19.2dB
Fig. 14: Gain(dB) Vs Proposed Gain
Fig.14 and Table 3 provide a comparison of the gain
(dB) with known approaches [47-50]. The proposed
technique produces a gain of 3.73dBi, which is
2.4dB higher than the [50].
Table 3. Comparison of Gain(dB)
Ref.
Technique used
Gain
[47]
Double element square ring slot
2.52.8 dBi
[48]
An inductor with a staircase-
shaped linked ground strip
1.42.5 dBi
[49]
T-shaped feed, inverted E and U
shaped stubs
2.2 dBi
[50]
Meandered meta-material
1.31 dBi
Proposed
MIMO patch antenna array
using metamaterial
superstrate
3.73dBi
Fig. 15: Mutual coupling (dB)
Fig.15 and Table 4 show a comparison of mutual
coupling (dB) with existing techniques [51-53].
Where the proposed technique achieves reduced
mutual coupling of -18 dB using metamaterial
superstrate.
Table 4. Comparison of mutual coupling (dB)
Ref.
MIMO antenna
details
Mutual
coupling
[51]
Radiating element:
staircase-shaped
Substrate: FR4
15 dB
[52]
Radiating element: E-
shaped tree structure
Substrate: FR4
Above 20 dB
[53]
Radiating element:
two spider-shaped
radiating patches
Substrate: FR4

Proposed
Radiating element:
Honey comb-shaped
using metamaterial
superstrate.
-18dB
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
150
Volume 21, 2022
5 Conclusion
Analyses of MIMO patch antennas with circular and
hexagonal arrays of metamaterial superstrate are
supported using varactor diode switching. By
employing a superstrate microstrip patch antenna,
gain and return loss are improved. With a bandwidth
of 33.4MHz, the proposed metamaterial superstrate
architecture achieves a maximum gain of 3.73dBi.
Thus, the suggested antenna demonstrated that it
meets the requirements of having a wider
bandwidth, being compact, having a stable radiation
pattern, and having a relatively higher gain. Hence,
the MIMO patch antenna array for 5G technology
with a minimum mutual coupling of -18dB was
developed efficiently using the proposed
metamaterial superstrate, predominantly in mm-
wave applications. The experimental results show
that the proposed framework outperforms the others
in terms of resonant frequency at 29GHz and return
loss of -19.2dB. The antenna structure with 29GHz
and return loss of -19.2dB can be manipulated and
reconfigured with different properties as a lumped
parameter using a resistor for high frequency.
References:
[1]. Arati Manjeshwar, et.al, “APTEEN: A Hybrid
Protocol for Efficient Routing and
Comprehensive Information Retrieval in
Wireless Sensor Networks”, 1530-2075/02,
IEEE, 2002
[2]. Andrews, J.G.; Buzzi, S.; Choi, W.; Hanly,
S.V.; Lozano, A.; Soong, A.C.; Zhang, J.C.
What will 5G be? IEEE J.Sel. Areas
Commun. 2014, 32, 10651082.
[3]. Y. Niu, Y. Li, D. Jin, L. Su, and A. V.
Vasilakos, “A survey of millimeter-wave
communications (mm-wave) for 5g:
opportunities and challenges,” Wireless
Networks, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 26572676,
2015.
[4]. A. Morgado, K. M. S. Huq, S. Mumtaz, and J.
Rodriguez, “A survey of 5g technologies:
regulatory, standardization and industrial
perspectives,” Digital Communications and
Networks, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 8797, 2018.
[5]. X. Ge, S. Tu, G. Mao, C.-X. Wang, and T.
Han, “5g ultra-dense cellular networks,” IEEE
Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 1, pp.
7279, 2016.
[6]. M. M. Lodro and S. Greedy, “A short review
on progress for 5g mm-wave cellular
communication networks.” 2016.
[7]. J. Zhang, M. Shafi, A. F. Molisch, F.
Tufvesson, S. Wu, and K. Kitao, “Channel
models and measurements for 5g,” IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 12,
pp. 1213, 2018.
[8]. M. M. Lodro, N. Majeed, A. A. Khuwaja, A.
H. Sodhro, and S. Greedy, “Statistical channel
modeling of 5g mm-wave MIMO wireless
communication,” in Computing, Mathematics
and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET),
2018 International Conference on. IEEE,
2018, pp. 15
[9]. Misilmani H M E and El-Hajj A M 2017
Massive MIMO Design for 5G Networks: An
Overview on Alternative Antenna
Configurations and Channel Model
Challenges. In: 2017 International Conference
on High Performance Computing &
Simulation (HPCS), pp 288-94.
[10]. Tong W and Peiying Z 2016 Huawei - 5G: A
Technology Vision Huawei Technical
Publications.
[11]. M. A. Jensen and J. W. Wallace, “A review of
antennas and propagation for MIMO wireless
communications,” IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 11, pp.
2810 2824, 2004.
[12]. J. Park and B. Clerckx, “Multi-User linear
precoding for multi polarized massive MIMO
system under imperfect CSIT,” IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications,
vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 25322547, 2015.
[13]. Zhang, L., T. Jiang, and Y. Li, “Design of a
high isolation dual-band MIMO antenna for
WLAN and WIMAX applications,” PIERS
Proceedings, 15931597, Prague, July 69,
2015.
[14]. Zulkifli, F. Y., and E. T. Rahardjo, “Compact
MIMO microstrip antenna with the defected
ground for mutual coupling suppression,”
PIERS Proceedings, 8992, Marrakesh,
Morocco, March 2023, 2011.
[15]. Bansod, B. H., “Compact two-port MIMO
microstrip antenna for 4G applications,”
Interna-2682 2017 Progress In
Electromagnetics Research Symposium
Fall (PIERS FALL), Singapore, 1922
November national Conference on
Information Processing Vishwakarma
Institute of Technology, 571574, Pune,
India, December 2015.
[16]. Sharawi, M.-S.: Printed multi-band MIMO
antenna systems and their performance
metrics’, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 2013,
55, (5), pp. 218 232.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
151
Volume 21, 2022
[17]. Roy, S.; Chakraborty, U. Mutual Coupling
Reduction in a Multi-band MIMO Antenna
Using Meta-Inspired Decoupling Network
Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 114, 32313246.
[18]. Nadeem, I.; Choi, D. Study on Mutual
Coupling Reduction Technique for MIMO
Antennas. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 563586.
[19]. Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, Q. Review of mutual
coupling in MIMO systems. IEEE Access
2018, 6, 2470624719.
[20]. Chouhan1, S.; Panda2, D.K.; Gupta, M.;
Singhal, S. Multiport MIMO antennas with
mutual coupling reduction techniques for
modern wireless transceiver operations: A
review. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided
Eng. 2017, 28, 113.
[21]. C.-M. Luo, J.-S. Hong, and L.-L. Zhong,
``Isolation enhancement of a very compact
UWB-MIMO slot antenna with two defected
ground structures,'' IEEE AntennasWireless
Propag. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 1766_1769,Apr.
2015.
[22]. B. K. Lau and J. B. Andersen, ``Simple and
ef_cient decoupling of compact arrays with
parasitic scatterers,'' IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 464_472, Feb.
2012.
[23]. H. Yi and S. Qu, ``A novel dual-band
circularly polarized antenna based on
electromagnetic band-gap structure,'' IEEE
Antennas Wireless Propag.Lett., vol. 12, pp.
1149_1152, Sep. 2013
[24]. Q. Li, A. P. Feresidis, M. Mavridou, and P. S.
Hall, ``Miniaturized double-layer EBG
structures for broadband mutual coupling
reduction between UWB monopoles,'' IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 3, pp.
1168_1171, Mar. 2015.
[25]. A. Pirhadi1, H. Bahrami, and A. Mallahzadeh,
``Electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) superstrate
resonator antenna design for monopulse
radiation pattern,'' Appl. Comput.
Electromagn. Soc. J., vol. 27, no. 11, pp.
908_917, 2012.
[26]. S. Wang and Z. Du, ``Decoupled dual-antenna
system using crossed neutralization lines for
LTE/WWAN smartphone applications,'' IEEE
Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 14, pp.
523_526, Nov. 2015.
[27]. H. Qi, L. Liu, X. Yin, H. Zhao, and W. J.
Kulesza, ``Mutual coupling suppression
between two closely spaced microstrip
antennas with an asymmetrical coplanar strip
wall,'' IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett.,
vol. 15, pp. 191_194, Jun. 2016.
[28]. S.-H. Zhu, X.-S. Yang, J. Wang, N.-S. Nie,
and B.-Z. Wang, ``Mutual coupling reduction
of _45_ dual-polarized closely spaced MIMO
antenna by topology optimization,'' IEEE
Access, vol. 8, pp. 29089_29098, 2020.
[29]. K.-L. Wu, C. Wei, X. Mei, and Z.-Y. Zhang,
``Array-antenna decoupling surface,'' IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 65, no. 12, pp.
6728_6738, Dec. 2017.
[30]. S. Zhang, X. Chen, and G. F. Pedersen,
``Mutual coupling suppression with
decoupling ground for massive MIMO
antenna arrays,'' IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.,
vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 7273_7282, Aug. 2019.
[31]. M. Li, B. G. Zhong, and S. W. Cheung,
``Isolation enhancement for MIMO patch
antennas using near-_eld resonators as
coupling-mode transducers,'' IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 755_764,
Feb. 2019.
[32]. C. F. Ding, X. Y. Zhang, C.-D. Xue, and C.-
Y.-D. Sim, ``Novel pattern diversity-based
decoupling method and its application to
multi-element MIMO antenna,'' IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 66, no. 10, pp.
4976_4985, Oct. 2018.
[33]. H. Li, B. K. Lau, Z. Ying, and S. He,
``Decoupling of multiple antennas in
terminals with chassis excitation using
polarization diversity, angle diversity and
current control,'' IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 5947_5957, Dec.
2012.
[34]. J. Ghosh, D. Mitra, and S. Das, ``Mutual
coupling reduction of slot antenna array by
controlling surface wave propagation,'' IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 67, no. 2, pp.
1352_1357, Feb. 2019
[35]. J.-Y. Lee, S.-H. Kim, and J.-H. Jang,
``Reduction of mutual coupling in planar
multiple antennae by using 1-D EBG and
SRR structures,'' IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 4194_4198, Sep.
2015.
[36]. Z. Wang, L. Zhao, Y. Cai, S. Zheng, and Y.
Yin, ``A meta-surface antenna array
decoupling (MAAD) method for mutual
coupling reduction in a MIMO antenna
system,'' Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, Feb. 2018,
Art. no. 3152
[37]. L. Si, H. Jiang, X. Lv, and J. Ding,
``Broadband extremely close-spaced 5G
MIMO antenna with mutual coupling
reduction using metamaterial inspired
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
152
Volume 21, 2022
superstrate,'' Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 3, pp.
3472_3482, 2019.
[38]. F. Liu, J. Guo, L. Zhao, X. Shen, and Y. Yin,
``A meta-surface decoupling method for two
linear polarized antenna arrays in sub-6 GHz
base station applications,'' IEEE Access, vol.
7, pp. 2759_2768, 2019.
[39]. A. Jafargholi, A. Jafargholi, and J. H. Choi,
``Mutual coupling reduction in an array of
patch antennas using CLL metamaterial
superstrate for MIMO applications,'' IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 67, no. 1, pp.
179_189, Jan. 2019.
[40]. F. Liu, J. Guo, L. Zhao, G.-L. Huang, Y. Li,
and Y. Yin, ``Dual-band metasurface-based
decoupling method for two closely packed
dual-band antennas,'' IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 552_557, Jan.
2020
[41]. X.-J. Zou, G.-M. Wang, Y.-W. Wang, and H.-
P. Li, ``An efficient decoupling network
between feeding points for multielement
linear arrays,'' IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3101_3108, May 2019.
[42]. T. S. Rappaport, J. N. Murdock, and F.
Gutierrez, “State of the art in 60-GHz
integrated circuits and systems for wireless
communications,” Proceedings of the IEEE,
vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 1390-1436, Aug. 2011.
[43]. IEEE802.15.3c-2009, Part 15.3: Wireless
Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical
Layer (PHY) Specifications for High Rate
Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs),
Amendment 2: Millimeter-wave-based
Alternative Physical Layer Extension, Oct.
2009.
[44]. Thummaluru, S.-R., Chaudhary, R.-K., ‘Mu
negative meta-material filter based isolation
technique for MIMO antennas’, Electron.
Lett., 2017, 53, (10), pp. 644646.
[45]. Jafargholi, A., Jafargholi, A., Choi, J.-H.:
‘Mutual coupling reduction in an array of
patch antennas using CLL metamaterial
superstrate for MIMO applications, IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., 2019, 67, (1), pp.
179189.
[46]. L. Si, H. Jiang, X. Lv, and J. Ding,
``Broadband extremely close-spaced 5G
MIMO antenna with mutual coupling
reduction using metamaterial inspired
superstrate,'' Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 3, pp.
3472_3482, 2019.
[47]. Ojaroudi Parchin, Naser, et al. "Multi-band
MIMO antenna design with a user-impact
investigation for 4G and 5G mobile
terminals." Sensors 19.3 (2019): 456.
[48]. Yang, Ming, Yufa Sun, and Fan Li. "A
compact wideband printed antenna for
4G/5G/WLAN wireless
applications." International Journal of
Antennas and Propagation 2019 (2019)
[49]. Desai, Arpan, et al. "Multiband inverted E,
and U-shaped compact antenna for Digital
broadcasting, wireless, and sub 6 GHz 5G
applications." AEU-International Journal of
Electronics and Communications 123 (2020):
153296.
[50]. Patel, Shobhit K., and Y. P. Kosta.
"Meandered multiband metamaterial square
microstrip patch antenna design." Waves in
Random and Complex Media 22.4 (2012):
475-487.
[51]. Chouhan, Sanjay, et al. "Spider-shaped fractal
MIMO antenna for WLAN/WiMAX/Wi-
Fi/Bluetooth/C-band applications." AEU-
International Journal of Electronics and
Communications 110 (2019): 152871
[52]. Addepalli, Tathababu, and Vaddinuri
Rajareddy Anitha. "Design and parametric
analysis of hexagonal-shaped MIMO patch
antenna for S-band, WLAN, UWB, and X-
band applications." Progress In
Electromagnetics Research C 97 (2019): 227-
240
[53]. Gao, Peng, et al. "Compact printed UWB
diversity slot antenna with 5.5-GHz band-
notched characteristics." IEEE Antennas and
Wireless Propagation Letters 13 (2014): 376-
379
[54]. Kavitha, K., and K. Seyatha. "Metamaterial
superstrate antenna design with gain
enhancement." International Journal of
Applied Engineering Research 13.24 (2018):
16939-16944.
[55]. Nazli, Nur Farzana Mohd, and Imran Mohd
Ibrahim. "Wideband antenna design for sub
6GHz range for 5G application." INOTEK
2021 1 (2021): 25-26.
[56]. Lee, Youngkin, et al. "Design of a MIMO
antenna with improved isolation using meta-
material." 2011 International Workshop on
Antenna Technology (iWAT). IEEE, 2011.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on CIRCUITS and SYSTEMS
DOI: 10.37394/23201.2022.21.15
Pallavi H. V., A. P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Paramesha
E-ISSN: 2224-266X
153
Volume 21, 2022
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.