The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the External Auditor's
Effort and His Opinion on the Firm is Going Concern
ABEER ABDALLAH MHAMMED GRAYB1, NASARELDEEN HAMED AHMED ALNOR1,2,*,
EID MAHMOUD ABOZAID1, EBRAHIM MOHAMMED AL-MATARI1,
ADAM MOHAMED OMER4, MOHAMED ELNAIR MOHAMEDAIN KHOGALY2,5
1Accounting Department, College of Business,
Jouf University,
SAUDI ARABIA
2Accounting Department, College of Business Studies,
Sudan University of Science and Technology,
SUDAN
3Faculty of Commerce and Economics,
Amran University, Amran,
YEMEN
4Accounting Program,
Applied College at Muhyle, King Khalid University,
SAUDI ARABIA
5Department of Administrative and Financial Sciences,
Al-Khafji University College, University of Hafr Al Batin,
SAUDI ARABIA
*Corresponding Author
Abstract: - This study aims to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the effort of an external
auditor and his opinion on the going concern of the firm through an applied study of firms registered in the
Saudi capital market. The added value of the research is to develop a model to test the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on auditing financial statements by building models to measure the auditor’s effort, and opinion on
the firm's going concern after and before the (Coronavirus) COVID-19 pandemic. The results show that the
COVID-19 pandemic is not significantly associated with the external auditor's effort and opinion on the firm is
of concern (OGC). The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted external auditors to step up their risk assessments
and scrutiny procedures. Firms’ financial stability, liquidity, and capacity to carry on business operations in the
face of the pandemic's economic uncertainties are all areas which auditors are closely monitoring.
Key-Words: - COVID-19 pandemic, financial statements audit, external auditor effort, opinion on the firm's
going concern, audit, Saudi Stock Exchange, Saudi Arabia.
Received: January 15, 2024. Revised: July 7, 2024. Accepted: August 2, 2024. Published: September 6, 2024.
1 Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic appeared at the beginning
of 2020, and the beginning was from China, where
it was classified as a contagious viral disease and
was transmitted from one person to another to most
or all countries of the world until the number of
infections globally reached more than 7.5 million
people, and the number of deaths reached more than
420 thousand people. The world was directed to
combat it through social divergence, banning
gatherings and roaming, closing institutions,
performing work from homes, home quarantine, and
quarantine of those with health, [1].
The precautionary measures of the COVID-19
pandemic affected business establishments, as the
demand for some products decreased, which
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1812
Volume 21, 2024
affected sales volume and profits to the extent that
affected the going concern of some establishments,
and there was a need for information regarding the
extent of going concern of the establishment, [1].
Most business decisions and entities depend on
the information that comes from business
establishments, including information about the
going concern of the establishment, which needs
more confirmation and credibility, achieved by
adding a professional opinion from a party
independent of the business establishment and the
users of its financial statements, which is the
external auditor, [2].
The relevant auditing standards require the
external auditor to assess the entity’s ability to
continue and express that, in his report on the audit
of the financial statements, [3] and given the impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic on business going
concerns, the external auditor’s responsibility
increases.
From another perspective, when precautionary
instructions were applied due to the COVID-19
pandemic, it became difficult for the auditor to
obtain sufficient evidentiary evidence; therefore, the
field visit of the business organization under audit
was not possible, which resulted in the auditor
developing additional and alternative audit
procedures, which may be reflected in an increase in
the effort of the external auditor during the audit of
the financial statements and increases the fees of the
audit process.
The problem of this study is the impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on companies’ businesses,
which is reflected in their financial statements and
has an impact on the process of auditing those lists;
however, this impact is possible due to the lack of
sufficient evidence from the business environment,
and the audit process includes many variables,
including planning the audit process, collecting
evidence, reporting, and fees. Among the most
important variables related to the audit process are
the external auditor’s effort, which reflects the
efficiency of the audit process, and the type of
opinion on the firm’s ongoing concern, which
reflects the effectiveness of the audit process.
Therefore, the research problem is to answer the
following research questions:
Does the COVID-19 pandemic affect the
external auditor's effort?
Does the COVID-19 pandemic affect his opinion
of the going concern of the firm?
Therefore, this study aims to measure the impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic on the effort of the
external auditor and his opinion on the going
concern of the firm through a practical analysis of
Saudi stock market businesses before and after the
COVID-19 pandemic.
Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has posed
hitherto unheard-of difficulties for industries and
occupations such as auditing, especially for external
auditors who are responsible for evaluating the
continuity of their clients' enterprises, [4].
This study adds to the body of knowledge
regarding this research issue and examines how
auditors assess a company's capacity to carry on
with business as usual (continuity) in the face of the
pandemic's disruptions, [5]. Several factors were
considered, including decreasing income,
restrictions on liquidity, disruptions in the supply
chain, and government support initiatives, [6]. We
also examined how auditors considered these
variables when determining whether a business
could continue as a continuing concern, [7].
In [8], the authors aim to understand how
auditors classified the effects of the coronavirus
(COVID-19) on the yearly financial statements of
corporations as Key Audit Matters (KAM) in their
reports, as well as the variables influencing such
reports. Their study's findings show a clear positive
correlation between the quantity of KAMs and
auditor size, event frequency, and entity doubt over
their ability to continue as a going concern, [8]. In
[9], the authors aimed to show how the coronavirus,
or COVID-19, affected external auditing from the
perspective of external auditors. One of their study's
most significant findings is that since the
coronavirus pandemic broke out, auditors have had
to take on new responsibilities. These include
ensuring that computer networks are reliable,
developing creative ways to communicate with
clients, and implementing cloud accounting to
comply with distance requirements, [9]. In [10], the
authors aimed to determine how key audit matters
(KAMs) in the COVID-19 pandemic new audit
report, as well as the choices made for various audit
reports and audit quality, are influenced by the
characteristics of auditors. Their findings suggest
that auditors' capacity to identify and reveal
important audit concerns is influenced by their
industry specialty, professional credentials, and
consequences of COVID-19. and excellent reviews,
[10].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1813
Volume 21, 2024
2 Literature Review and Development
of Hypotheses
2.1 COVID-19 Pandemic and the External
Auditor's Effort
External audit procedures reflect specific practices
in the form of steps that need to be carried out,
which differ from item to item of the financial
statements, and by following them, the objectives of
the external audit can be achieved. These steps are
called the external audit program, which includes
procedures, including examination, observation,
approvals, comparisons, and analytical and critical
examination, [11].
In [12], the authors believe that the main
objective of auditing the financial statements is to
express a neutral technical opinion on them by
“GAAP” generally accepted accounting principles
and international auditing standards, and to achieve
this main objective requires the auditor to make an
effort by performing a set of procedures such as:
- Verification of the physical presence of assets
using inventory.
- Verify ownership by viewing ownership
documents.
- Verifying the validity of the evaluation of the
values of the items in the financial statements.
- Checking mathematical and accounting
accuracy.
- Check border operations.
- Observance of completeness and
comprehensive disclosure.
- We consider events following the production
of financial reports and before the issuance of
the report.
- Observe adequate disclosure of financial facts
and transactions.
- Perform analytical procedures for verification
purposes.
In [2], the authors believe that the auditor makes
an effort to achieve tasks, including verifying that
the annual financial reports are regular, correct, and
completely identical to the results of the previous
year’s operations, and expressing his evaluation,
which was authorized by the management and board
of directors as a special report on internal control
practices. The General Assembly is responsible for
every deficiency that it may discover or become
aware of, and it is in its nature to impede the
continuation of the establishment.
In [13], the author believes that the auditor’s
work proceeds according to a set of steps and
procedures, which ensures the good conduct of the
external audit and helps the effectiveness of
performance to reach the planned goals through the
following steps:
- A general study on the economic unit under
audit.
- Evaluation of the internal control system.
- Auditing the elements of the financial
statements and supporting evidence.
- Preparing the external audit report.
With the complexities related to COVID-19,
auditors must stay up-to-date with effective audit
conduct and quality. Because changes affect every
step of the audit process, the auditor should audit the
most recent available guidance and follow through
with due diligence throughout the planning process
to avoid unworkable inspection requirements or
writing a finding of something inconsistent, [14].
COVID-19 reduced the auditor’s effort, as after
March 2020, the auditor did not go to the
headquarters of the organization he was auditing but
rather worked remotely using technology and the
Internet, [15].
In [16], the author believes that the development
of the auditor's training in science and practice
should be audited in line with the audit requirements
in light of the conditions of the COVID-19
pandemic, which resulted in a high level of
uncertainty. Continuous training should be obtained
regarding technical evaluation topics, as well as
training on how to evaluate complex and innovative
financial instruments and understand accounting
models, financing models, mathematical and
statistical models, and other economic models.
The auditor prepares a list of the most important
effective control activities and the most important
fundamental changes that occurred in the control
environment, each separately, and sets a vision for
the organization's audit committee discussion. It
must be adhered to, develop an incentive system,
design environmental management systems, verify
the optimal use of available resources, and design
internal audit report forms on these topics, [17]. In
addition, auditors should make more efforts in light
of the Covid-19 pandemic, especially on the
following points:
Collecting audit evidence: [12], believes that
evidence of proof means all the facts that are
presented to the human mind to enable him to make
a specific decision on a controversial subject, and
[18] believes that the evidence of evidence is that
the auditor obtains from data and information from
various sources, to obtain sufficient and appropriate
evidence according to the approved statistical
methods with the personal judgment of the auditor
to support the opinion of the auditor in the financial
statements. [19], believes that evidence is a set of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1814
Volume 21, 2024
information and data that can be easily verified,
related to certain operations under examination,
which have an impact on the formation of a neutral
technical opinion on the annual financial reports of
business establishments.
The process of collecting audit evidence is
difficult because of the Covid-19 pandemic due to
the restrictions imposed by countries to combat the
spread of the virus, such as social distancing and
curfews. Under these circumstances, the auditor
cannot visit the organization under audit or even
attend actual inventory counts. Therefore, the
auditor will have difficulty collecting supporting
evidence or interviewing individuals to obtain
rational justifications, and the COVID-19 pandemic
requires setting up an audit plan in a different way
than its predecessor to obtain appropriate and
sufficient evidence electronically and using video to
express his opinion, [20].
. Auditing accounting estimates: The auditor
must make reasonable efforts to obtain sufficient
and appropriate evidence as to whether the
accounting estimates of the organization under audit
are reasonable in light of the surrounding
circumstances and whether the disclosure is
sufficient. The accounting estimate was affected by
the COVID-19 pandemic, as this created a state of
uncertainty regarding future expectations for the
availability of raw materials, revenues, manpower,
financing sources, and changes in prices. An
example of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
is the presence of idle capacity and a decline in the
value of inventory, which leads to an increase in the
cost of one unit and its deviation from the standard
cost, and the auditor must use the following
methods when examining accounting estimates:
- Examination and verification of the process
used by the organization’s management to
prepare accounting estimates, [21].
- Using an independent estimate and comparing
it with the estimates of the organization's
management, [22], in light of the COVID-19
pandemic, it is difficult to make this estimate,
which requires the help of experts.
- Verifying subsequent events that provide audit
evidence about the reasonableness of
accounting estimates prepared by the
organization's management.
Auditing subsequent events: The COVID-19
pandemic affected how companies present and
disclose subsequent events based on the date of the
organization’s financial statements and reports.
Subsequent events occur between the date of
preparing financial statements and reports, and
before their issuance is approved.
In light of the findings documented in the literature,
this study aims to further this discussion by
examining the aforementioned link in Saudi Arabia.
We frame our hypotheses as follows:
H1: The COVID-19 pandemic is not
significantly associated with the external
auditor's effort
2.2 COVID-19 pandemic and opinion on the
firm's going concern
In [20], the author discusses the challenges of the
auditor in providing audit quality during COVID-19
and examines the difficulties auditors face in
providing high-quality audits during the COVID-19
epidemic by utilizing a documentary audit approach
and concentrating on audit evidence, continuity
evaluation, auditor competency, and audit fees.
developing a survey or conducting interviews to
examine how COVID-19 affects audit quality,
particularly in Malaysia. The research produced a
set of findings, including an increase in evidence
collection, complexity of continuity assessment,
decrease in auditor efficiency, and decrease in audit
fees.
In [16], the researcher looked at the most
significant issues and difficulties faced by auditors
when conducting auditing operations during the
Covid-19 pandemic to achieve the author's goal of
educating readers about the effects of the pandemic
on the auditing profession and the auditor’s work in
light of Egyptian and international auditing
standards. That certain measures are proposed that
might assist the auditor in resolving these issues and
obstacles, with a field study conducted on some
accountants and auditors in the Egyptian accounting
and auditing offices and researchers and those
interested in accounting and auditing, where the
researcher distributed (100) questionnaire to the
study population as a proportional stratified random
sample The valid questionnaires for conducting the
statistical analysis were (81) questionnaires, and the
data were analyzed using appropriate statistical
methods. The study reached a set of results,
including that the Covid-19 pandemic caused many
problems and challenges to the auditing profession
and the work of the auditor, including problems of
auditing subsequent events, problems of amending
external audit reports, problems of auditing
components of group companies, and problems of
continuously updating the audit work plan. Audit
risk, the inadequacy and appropriateness of regular
audit procedures, and the assessment of the ability
to continue the economic unit, in addition to
accounting estimates, have increased.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1815
Volume 21, 2024
In light of the findings documented in the literature,
this study aims to further this discussion by
examining the aforementioned link in Saudi Arabia.
We frame our hypotheses as follows:
H2: The COVID-19 pandemic is not
significantly associated with opinion on the
firm's going concern
3 Research Methodology
Our study aims to analyze the impact of the
coronavirus pandemic on external auditors’ efforts
and their assessment of the company’s continuity.
To do this, we rely on a quantitative analysis of
Saudi companies’ data for the period 2018–2020
AD. Data calculations were performed in Excel and
then entered into the SPSS software to calculate
correlation and regression.
3.1 Data Collection and Sample
Collecting data related to the efforts of the external
auditor and expressing an opinion of the firm is a
concern, [23]. The current study relied on an
empirical study of non-financial companies listed on
the Saudi Stock Exchange through a content
analysis of annual reports during the period 2018-
2021; Information was gathered from the websites
of the businesses and Tadawul. Statistical analysis
was performed using out. Regression, correlation,
and descriptive analyses were conducted.
3.2 Sample Selection
The research community consists of companies
listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange and a sample
was selected according to a set of determinants,
which is the availability of the necessary data for the
study during the period 2018-2021, and that it was
from non-financial institutions due to the existence
of special requirements for those institutions, that no
material events such as mergers or acquisitions
occurred, that it should not Trade in its shares is
suspended, companies with unavailable data were
excluded, and in light of this, a sample of (63)
companies was selected, with a total number of
(252) observations.
3.3 Measurement of Variables
Dependent variable:
- External auditor's effort (AE): This
variable was measured using inventory +
customers/total assets, according to [20].
- Opinion on the firm is going concern
(OGC): This variable was measured using
a dummy value = 1 in reporting that going
concern within the audit report; value = zero
otherwise.
Independent variable: COVID-19 pandemic
This variable was measured using a dummy value of
1 in the period after the COVID-19 pandemic;
Value = zero in the period before the COVID-19
pandemic.
Control variables:
The empirical model of the study includes the
following three control variables:
1-The audit client's realization of losses
(LOSS): This variable was measured using a
fictitious value = 1 in the case of the firm realized
net loss; value = zero otherwise.
2-financial Leverage (LEV): This variable was
measured by total assets dividing total liabilities.
3.4 Model
The following multiple regression model was
estimated to test the hypothesis:
AE it = β0 + β1 COVID-19 it + β2 LOSS it + β3
LEV it + ε
(1)
OGC it = β0 + β1 COVID-19 it + β2 LOSS it + β3
LEV it + ε
(2)
Where:
) AE) External auditor's effort
(OGC) Opinion on the firm is going concern
LOSS
LEV
β1
Ε
Table 1 summarizes the measurement variables
used in this study.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1816
Volume 21, 2024
Table 1. “Summary of variables measurement”
Measurement
Variable
This variable was
measured using Inventory
+ customers / total assets.
External
auditor's effort
(AE)
This variable was
measured using a dummy
value = 1 in reporting that
going concern within the
audit report; Value = zero
otherwise
Opinion on the
firm is going
concern (OGC)
This variable was
measured using a dummy
value = 1 in the period
after the COVID-19
pandemic; Value = zero
in the period before the
COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19
a dummy value = 1 in the
case of the firm's realized
net loss; Value = zero
otherwise
The audit
client's
realization of
losses
measured by total assets
dividing total liabilities
financial
Leverage
4 Analysis and results
Table 2. Correlations results H1
Correlations
AE
COVID19
LOSS
LEV
AE
Pearson Correlation
1
-.011
.107
-.008
Sig. (2-tailed)
.857
.091
.905
COVID19
Pearson Correlation
1
.026
-.099
Sig. (2-tailed)
.685
.117
LOSS
Pearson Correlation
1
-.152*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.016
LEV
Pearson Correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Table 2 shows the Pearson correlation
coefficient, which shows a weak negative
correlation of greater than -0.5 for both AE with
COVID19 and LEV, and a weak positive correlation
of less than +0.5, for both LOSS with AE and
COVID19.
Table 3. Regression results H1
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std.
Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
.105
.019
5.503
.000
COVID19
-.003
.016
-.013
-.212
.832
LOSS
.030
.018
.108
1.696
.091
LEV
.004
.034
.008
.117
.907
a. Dependent Variable: AE
The regression analysis results used to test the
hypotheses are displayed in Table 3. Findings
related to the external auditor's effort (AE) variable.
The coefficient B is found to be not significant,
which means that there is a not significant impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on the External auditor's
effort at a significant level of more than 0.05, which
indicates rejection of the alternative hypothesis and
the acceptance of the null hypothesis, which states
that COVID-19 pandemic is not significantly
associated with External auditor's effort (AE)
Regarding the control variables, the findings in
Table 3 reveal that the effect of financial leverage
and audit client losses do not have a significant
impact on the External auditor's effort.
Table 4. Correlations results: H2
Correlations
OGC
COVID19
LOSS
LEV
OGC
Pearson Correlation
1
.063
.043
.071
Sig. (2-tailed)
.318
.500
.263
COVID19
Pearson Correlation
1
.026
-.099
Sig. (2-tailed)
.685
.117
LOSS
Pearson Correlation
1
-.152*
Sig. (2-tailed)
.016
LEV
Pearson Correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Table 4 shows the Pearson correlation coefficient
which shows a weak negative correlation of less
than - 0.5 for LEV with LOSS a strong negative
correlation of less than - 0.5 for LEV and COVID-
19 and a weak positive correlation of less than +0.5
for OGC with COVID19, LOSS and LEV. And
COVID-19 with LOSS.
Table 5. Regression results: H2
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std.
Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
.981
.009
105.206
.000
COVID19
.009
.008
.070
1.108
.269
LOSS
.007
.009
.054
.844
.400
LEV
.023
.017
.086
1.339
.182
a. Dependent Variable: OGC
Table 5 shows the results of the regression
analysis used to test this hypothesis. The findings
related to opinions on the firm are a going concern
(OGC) variable. The coefficient B is found to be not
significant, which means that there is a not
significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
Opinion on the firm is going concern (OGC) at a
significant level of more than 0.05, which indicates
rejection of the alternative hypothesis and the
acceptance of the null hypothesis, which states that
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1817
Volume 21, 2024
COVID-19 pandemic is not significantly
associated with Opinion on the firm is going
concern (OGC)
As regards the control variables, the findings in
Table 5 reveal that the effect of financial leverage
and the audit client’s losses do not have a significant
impact on Opinion on the firm is going concern
(OGC).
5 Conclusion
This study mainly investigated the impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on the external auditor's effort
(AE) and opinion on the firm is going concern
(OGC) in the Saudi business environment, and the
results show that the COVID-19 pandemic is not
significantly associated with the external auditor's
effort and opinion on the firm is going concern
(OGC), possibly because the scientific and practical
qualification available to the auditors to deal with
developments in this phenomenon, [16] and the
ability of audit offices to provide the necessary
training.
This finding differs from the study [11], in which
it is believed that the COVID-19 pandemic led to a
decrease in evidence auditing as a result of the
auditor not conducting field visits to the audit client,
but rather working remotely using technology, and
[24], [25], believe that the COVID-19 pandemic
increases evidence audit because the auditor will
have difficulty in interviewing individuals to obtain
rational justifications, which differs from the study
of [16], [25] where he believes that the COVID-19
pandemic is significantly associated with an opinion
on the firm is going concern (OGC).
This study extends and updates the limited
empirical evidence on this issue in the Saudi
business environment. Thus, this study adds to the
continuing debate on the role of the COVID-19
pandemic and various general phenomena in
enhancing the external auditor's effort (AE) and the
firm's going concern (OGC).
Moreover, the results reported in this study can
provide useful information to regulators and audit
standard setters, as the qualification requirements of
auditors are strengthened about information
technology and artificial intelligence and their
impact on the audit process and the utilization of
these tools in general, and in light of crises such as
COVID-19 in particular. Developing auditing
standards to include how to collect evidence in light
of crises and disasters and how to report on their
impact on firms is of concern. The results reported
in this study can also provide useful information for
audit offices by developing a plan for training and
continuous professional development on the use of
information technology and artificial intelligence in
the audit process as part of the quality requirements
of the audit office. One limitation of this study was
data availability.
The paucity of information is a proxy for
external auditors’ efforts, such as the total hours of
the audit. This restriction encourages more research
than devaluing insightful conclusions from the
study. Thus, a potential opportunity for future
research could be to use other proxies of external
auditors’ effort (AE) and the firm's going concern
(OGC). Further, future research may also use the
size of the audit office as a modified variable
context in this relationship.
The study's conclusions call for greater
examination and effort since the coronavirus disease
(COVID-19) epidemic has made external auditors
more watchful and diligent. To obtain a thorough
knowledge of the company's reaction to the
pandemic, external auditors were compelled to
participate in more regular and transparent contact
with management and stakeholders, in addition to
assessing elevated risks and improving
communication and collaboration. address issues
with financial reporting and modify audit protocols
in light of the need for auditors to modify their audit
protocols to account for travel constraints, remote
working arrangements, and physical access
limitations to client locations. and not sway the
auditor's assessment.
Temporal analysis, which examines the
development of external auditors’ efforts and their
assessment of business continuity during and after
the pandemic, is a possible new component or angle
of research on the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on external auditors’ efforts and opinions
on business continuity. An examination unique to
the auditing profession was also carried out, with an
emphasis on technology adoption and the role of
technology in enabling remote audit operations
during the pandemic. The impact of technology on
auditor efforts and continuity assessments is also
examined. Along with adaptability, flexibility, and
facing disruptions caused by the pandemic.
Acknowledgement:
The authors extend their appreciation to the
Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid
University for funding this work through a large-
group Research Project under grant number
(RGP.2/131/45).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1818
Volume 21, 2024
This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific
Research at Jouf University under Grant Number
(DSR2021-04-0111).
References:
[1] Alshare, H. F., Kadir, M. R. B. A.,
Kamarudin, K. A., & Hassan, H. B. (2023).
The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Earnings
Management: Using the CEO Compensation
as Moderator. WSEAS Transactions on
Business and Economics, vol. 20, pp.505-513,
https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.46.
[2] Al-Shazly, I. (2013). The Role of External
Auditing in Improving the Quality of
Accounting Information, Master's Thesis,
Mohamed Kheidar University - Bisra
Algeria.
[3] SOCPA (The Saudi Organization for Certified
Public Accountants).(2020). International
Standards for Auditing, Examination and
Other Assurances, and related services,
[Online] https://socpa.org.sa/. (Accessed Date:
September 1, 2021).
[4] Spence, S. M. (2023). “I’m just a number, I’m
not a person, I’m just a servant to the
system”: introducing a new conceptual
framework to understand bullying in NHS
midwifery, Doctoral dissertation, University of
Leeds.
[5] Alao, B. B., & Gbolagade, O. L. (2020).
Coronavirus pandemic and business
disruption: The consideration of accounting
roles in business revival. International
Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary
Research .Vol 4, Issue 5,108-115.
[6] Khan, S. A. R., Razzaq, A., Yu, Z., Shah, A.,
Sharif, A., & Janjua, L. (2022). Disruption in
food supply chain and undernourishment
challenges: An empirical study in the context
of Asian countries. Socio-Economic Planning
Sciences, 82, 101033.
[7] Gallizo, J. L., & Saladrigues, R. (2016). An
analysis of determinants of going concern
audit opinion: Evidence from Spain stock
exchange. Intangible Capital, 12(1), 1-16.
[8] Hategan, C. D., Pitorac, R. I., & Crucean, A. C.
(2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on
auditors’ responsibility: evidence from
European listed companies on key audit
matters. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(7),
886-907.
[9] Al-Aamaedeh, Z. O., & Alhosban, A. A.
(2021). The impact of coronavirus (COVID-
19) on external audit from the viewpoint of
external auditors. International Journal of
Entrepreneurship, 25, 1-12.
[10] Hegazy, M. A. A., El-Haddad, R., &
Kamareldawla, N. M. (2022). Impact of
auditor characteristics and Covid-19
Pandemic on KAMs reporting. Managerial
Auditing Journal, 37(7), 908-933.
[11] Al-Khair,B.S.(2017). The role of the quality of
external auditing in improving the efficiency
of accounting information, doctoral
dissertation, Sudan University of Science and
Technology, Sudan
[12] Al-Zayegh, H.F.(2006). The Role of the
External Auditor in Evaluation of Evidence to
Express an Opinion on the Financial
Statements in Accordance with Internal
Auditing Standards, Master's Thesis, Islamic
University, Gaza, Palestine.
[13] Kadari, L.(2015). The Role of External
Auditing in Improving the Quality of
Accounting Information, Master's Thesis,
University of Martyr Hama Lakhdar in El-
Wadi, Algeria.
[14] Bahazhevska,N.(2021). Conducting Single
Audits DURING COVID-19, The CPA
Journal, Vol. April / May, pp.48-52.
[15] De Corte,M and Wright, A. (2021). Auditing
in a COVID-19 Environment, The Journal of
the American Society of Military
Comptrollers, Vol. 66 Issue 1, 48-53 .
[16] Nafeh, M.A.(2021).The Impact of the Corona
Pandemic on the Auditing Profession and the
Auditors Work, Journal of Commerce and
Finance, Tanta University, Egypt, Vol (1),390-
3462.
[17] Shehata, S. A. (2021).Matrix of roles and
areas of modern internal auditing in light of
the Corona pandemic, Journal of Commerce
and Finance, Vol(1), Tanta University, Egypt,
138-155
[18] Jing, H. (2023). The Relevance of Audit
Quality, Debt Financing and Earnings
Management. WSEAS Transactions on
Business and Economics, vol. 20, pp.2205-
2223,
https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.191.
[19] Marei, A. (2023). The Moderating Role of Big
Data and User Satisfaction in the Predictors of
Generalized Audit Software among Jordanian
Auditing Firms. WSEAS Transactions on
Business and Economics, vol.20, pp.1357-
1367,
https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.121.
[20] Lee, H.Y. and Jahang. G. (2008).
Determinants of Audit Report Lag: Evidence
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1819
Volume 21, 2024
Erom Korea An Examination Of Auditor
_Related Factors", The Journal of Applied
Business Research , 23(2):27-44.
[21] Hamza, R. A. E. M., Ahmed, N. H.,
Mohamed, A. M. E., Bennaceur, M. Y.,
Elhefni, A. H. M., & Elshaabany, M. M.
(2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence
(AI) on the Accounting System of Saudi
Companies. WSEAS Transactions on Business
and Economics, vol.21, pp.499-511,
https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.42.
[22] Benzerrouk, Z. S., Alnor, N. H. A., Al-Matari,
E. M., Alhebri, A., & Al-bukhrani, M. A.
(2023). The effect of the banking supervision
on anti-money laundering. Humanities and
Social Sciences Letters, 11(4), 399-415.
[23] Alnor, N. H. A, Al-Matar, E. M, Mohmed, T.
E. B, Berradia, H. M. Mohamed, A. M. E,
Benzerrouk, Z. S. (2023). The Effect of
Developing Human Capabilities on the
Company's Performance through Developing
the Company's Capabilities. WSEAS
Transactions on Business and Economics vol.
21, pp.95-108,
https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.9.
[24] Alassuli, A. (2023). The Impact of Adopting
the Joint External Audit Approach on the
Auditor's Opinion and its Reflection on
Information Asymmetry: An Applied Study at
Firms Registered on Amman Stock Market
Exchange, WSEAS Transactions on Business
and Economics, vol. 20, pp.836-847,
https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.77.
[25] Salleh S.M, and Najebah. N. A. (2021). Audit
Quality: Auditors’ Challenges in COVID-19
Era, Global Business and Management
Research: An International Journal, Vol(13),
No(4), 946-954.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors made equal contributions to the current
study from the conceptualization of the problem to
the conclusion and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
The authors extend their appreciation to the
Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid
University for funding this work through a large-
group Research Project under grant number
(RGP.2/131/45).
This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific
Research at Jouf University under Grant Number
(DSR2021-04-0111).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.148
Abeer Abdallah Mhammed Grayb,
Nasareldeen Hamed Ahmed Alnor,
Eid Mahmoud Abozaid, Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari,
Adam Mohamed Omer, Mohamed Elnair Mohamedain Khogaly
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1820
Volume 21, 2024