Quality Assurance Model To Minimize Stress and
Burnout Behavior in Social Welfare Institutions
ELLYA SUSILOWATI1, SUBUR KARYATUN2, EKO TAMA PUTRA SARATIAN3,
MOCHAMAD SOELTON3, NIKE VONIKA1
1Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial,
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No.367, Dago, Kecamatan Coblong, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40135,
INDONESIA
2Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Business,
Universitas Nasional,
Jl. Sawo Manila No. 1, Pejaten, Pasar Minggu, Jakarta Selatan 12520,
INDONESIA
3Management Department, Faculty of Economic and Business,
Universitas Mercu Buana,
Jl. Meruya Selatan No. 1, Meruya, Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11650,
INDONESIA
Abstract: - Orphanages or Children's Orphanages are also (LKSA) Institutions for Child Welfare which are
charitable, nonprofit organizations that provide shelter, instruction, and care for abandoned, orphaned, and
orphans. The role of a Child Welfare Institution is not only as a childcare institution in institution but also as a
gatekeeper. In the Social Welfare Institutions in the Malang Regency, this study seeks to ascertain and examine
the relationship between employee engagement and burnout, with work stress serving as a mediating variable.
22 Social Welfare Institutions make up the study's sample. In this study, researchers used a sample of 66 carers.
The Structural Equation Model (SEM) using the Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis tool was employed in this
study's analysis. The gathering of information technique was conducted by a questionnaire. The study's findings
show that employee involvement and quality assurance have negative and substantial effects on burnout, while
quality assurance has a negative and significant impact on job stress, and employee engagement negatively and
significantly impacts how stressful a job is. negatively and not significant impact, job stress has an important
and favorable impact, job stress can moderate the impact of employee involvement on burnout but cannot
mediate the impact of quality assurance on burnout.
Key-Words: - Quality Assurance, Employee Engagement, Burnout, Work Stress, Social Welfare Institutions.
Received: November 8, 2023. Revised: May 21, 2024. Accepted: June 20, 2024. Published: July 12, 2024.
1 Introduction
HR development forms quality human beings with
expertise, aptitude for the job, and loyalty. Social
Welfare Institutions (LKS) require high-loyalty
employees so that Social welfare projects can be
carried out successfully and effectively, [1], [2]. To
ensure that people's material, spiritual, and social
needs are met so they can live healthily and have
the opportunity to grow as individuals, to fulfill
their societal obligations (UU No.11/2009).
However, social welfare protection is a focused,
integrated & the government ongoing, sustained
endeavor, regional government as well as the
neighborhood in the form of social assistance meet
minimum requirements for every citizen, including
public rehabilitation, public assistance, public
empowerment & public protection.
Republic of Indonesia's Social Affairs
Minister's Decree No. 30 of 2011, Child Welfare
Institutions (LKSA) public associations or
organizations that implement public welfare for
children the community has formed, whether
incorporated or not. The Social and Child Welfare
Institution (LKSA) is a non-profit organization in
the social sector that obtains most of its funds from
community donations in the form of infaq and
alms.
A non-profit organization is an institution
whose activities do not aim to make a profit/profit.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1598
Volume 21, 2024
This organization emerged because of the
government's limitations in providing services to
the community, including neglected children, [3].
Although not profit-oriented, non-profit institutions
must pay attention to the financial aspects that
come from public funds. Therefore, financial
responsibility is an important part of non-profit
organizations to explain to the public how to
manage their finances and to increase the trust of
non-profit public organizations, especially Social
and Child Welfare Institutions (LKSA).
Orphanages or Child Care Social Institutions
are also Child Welfare organizations (LKSA),
which are non-profit social organizations that
house, educate, and look after orphans and children
who have been neglected, [4]. The function of the
Child Welfare Institution (Panti) is not only as the
executor of child care in the institution/apartment
but also as a gatekeeper. LKSA as one of the
parties that provides alternative care is still far from
the parenting function, [5].
LKSA must be able to play a role in protecting
children from acts of violence, [6]. The phenomena
that surfaced at the Social Welfare Institutions
(LKS) in Malang Regency have led to permanent
work fatigue, namely with many caregivers being
allowed on the grounds of headaches and feeling
pain in the limbs as well as constant drowsiness
during working hours. In addition, other caregivers
are easily angry and easily aware and less
concerned about the surrounding environment,
including fellow caregivers.
The identification above is a pattern of burnout,
which can be described as a psychological state that
is a response to prolonged stress, [7]. Burnout is
characterized by extreme fatigue, feeling cynical
about tasks, feelings of inadequacy, and failure.
Added, [8], burnout is a collection of psychological
syndromes It exhibits traits such as emotional
weariness, the fading of individuality & decreased
individual success, [9], individuals who have
relationships professionals with other people, [10].
The results of [11], research show that burnout can
reduce one's perception of the balance of life and
work. Burnout can appear in the form of physical,
mental, and social fatigue. heavy emotions
Psychobiological processes involved when a person
experiences burnout which appears in the form of
physical symptoms such as loss of focus,
complaints of pain, and susceptibility to pain, [12].
Compared to earlier studies, this one is more
valuable and innovative in the concept of Quality
Control, Engagement of Employees, Burnout, and
Job Stress, and this is what differentiates it from the
previous research findings. Previous research has
shown various causes of variables that influence
the emergence of burnout behavior, [13], concludes
that the impact of quality control is both favorable
and significant, research by [14], concludes the
opposite that positive effects of quality control but
not significant effect on burnout. According to
research by [15]. Burnout and employee
engagement are significantly positively correlated.
It is explained that the desire for all jobs done by
organizational members, including how they
engage in physical, mental, and emotional
expression during the job. While, [16], provides the
result of his study that Engagement of Workers
negative and substantial impact on Burnout.
Employees cannot issues what is their cognitive
and emotional performance during their activities.
Quality Assurance Research on Work Stress,
according to [17], that Quality Assurance has a
negative and significant effect on Job Stress.
Likewise, research by [18], stated that Employee
Engagement in Work Stress resulted in
insignificant conclusions. Furthermore, [19]
concluded the elemental variable of Work Stress
has a favorable and significant impact on Burnout.
The above conclusion states that there is
research concern, burnout is influenced by quality
assurance and employee engagement with different
results in research in different sectors. According to
[20], Burnout can be experienced by everyone,
including men and women. This is because
everyone certainly experiences pressure in every
activity or activity in the life they live, [21].
Burnout can have very fatal consequences if it
continues to be left untreated because it can have
an impact on the goals of the organization,
especially the Social Welfare Organization (LKS).
Proper handling of One of the most important
criteria in choosing the achievement of a company
or Social Welfare Institution (LKS). Employee
burnout is a problem that is often discussed by
companies in recent years, this is because the
handling of employee burnout is very important to
see long-term development for the organization.
Social Welfare Institutions (LKS) quality
requirements from start to finish, implement quality
assurance as a planned and systematic activity
implemented in a quality management system to
ensure that a product or service complies, [22]. The
manufacturing process ensures that the product or
service can comply with the specifications outlined
in the quality design, which also includes a
statement that the manufacturer (institution)
guarantees the product or service that has been
issued [23]. For quality control and respect for
Social Welfare Institutions (LKS) to win the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1599
Volume 21, 2024
public's trust, are given priority. Social Welfare
Organization (LKS) whose reputation for
excellence must inspire good Quality Assurance
images, to improve the volume and interest of the
public for entry into the institution.
Problematically, though, not all of the Social
Welfare Organizations (LKS) are capable of fully
putting into practice Quality Assurance.
The study [24], said that their study,
Employees Engagement plays a significant part in
mediating how they are related to employee
empowerment and performance of employees.
Employees Employee emotional dedication to the
company and its objectives is known as
engagement. Employees who are emotionally
invested in their work care deeply about it, which
organization, [25]. Involving workers overall the
momentum and the right policies also have a
favorable impact on the overall employee
performance. By implementing employee
empowerment and employee engagement in
organizations, employees tend to be more involved,
feel involved, and have fun at the party, [26].
In this case, the function of the Job Stress
variable serves as a mediator between Quality
Assurance, Employee Engagement, and Burnout.
Work Stress explains the relationship between by
acting as auxiliary factor Quality Assurance,
Employee Engagement, and Burnout. It can be
illustrated that Job Stress can have an increasing or
mitigating effect on exhaustion. With the
relationship between Quality Assurance and
Employee Engagement with Burnout, Job Stress
can act as a mediator variable. Therefore, based on
the background described above, it appears
important it is to know the effect of Quality Control
and engagement of Workers in Employee
exhaustion and Workplace Stress mediator. Being
distinctive of this study is the recent use of quality
assurance to improve a non-profits effectiveness
organizations. In earlier research, quality assurance
has been used as a control for organizations in the
profit sector.
2 Literature Review and Hypotheses
2.1 The Effect of Quality Assurance on
Burnout
The studies [27], showcased a series of Quality
Assurance scopes of work around matters related to
how a product has promising quality assurance.
The purpose of implementing Quality Assurance is
to maintain internal and external quality within an
organization that implements it. Based on the
results of a study carried out showed the correlation
has a favorable impact on quality assurance on
exhaustion, therefore leaders must provide jobs to
employees according to their respective job desks,
otherwise there will be concerns that employees
may experience burnout. Work. Quality Control
(Quality Control) is all strategies and methodical
efforts to offer assurance that is used to satisfy
certain requirements for quality. Quality Assurance
is quality assurance before being processed, being
processed, and after being processed.
H1: Quality Assurance generates a positive
impact on Burnout.
2.2 The Effect of Employee Engagement on
Burnout
According to [28], Employee Engagement involves
an employee who is fully involved in his work, so
that person has great responsibility for his work. A
work bond that is fully involved in a job in full, is
responsible not only for work, wants to prioritize
work, works earnestly, completes work without
procrastinating, and uses working hours as they
should. To achieve the goals of an organization,
employee engagement is something that is needed.
It demonstrates the beneficial relationship between
employee engagement in burnout, which means
there is employee involvement that has the
potential for burnout to occur, therefore it is
necessary to have a balance of employee
involvement so that it can reduce burnout.
Employees Employee engagement is their
excitement for their jobs as a result of putting their
best efforts toward tasks that are in line with the
strategic aims of the business.
H2: Employee Engagement generates a positive
impact on Burnout.
2.3 The Impact of Quality Assurance on
Work Stress
In line with [29], Quality Assurance maintains an
ongoing program that is objectively and
systematically arranged to meet and assess the
quality and reasonableness of care for patients. Use
opportunities to increase patient care and resolve
identified problems. studies carried out by, show a
constructive outcome influence among quality
assurance on job stress, therefore it is necessary to
appeal to all employees to be able to control
themselves so they dont become stressed in doing
a job. An excessive burden placed on an
organization or Social Welfare Institution (LKS) on
its employees so that employees feel stressed and
put forth can decrease. Stress is a state of tension
that causes physical and mental effects atmosphere
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1600
Volume 21, 2024
that have an impact on an employees condition,
emotions, and mental processes. Stress levels that
are tall or even low, but continue to occur, can
encourage workers to want to abandon the
organization even greater, and this demands serious
action from the organization. According to this
study, the activities listed below are part of the
quality assurance function that requires quality
work to satisfy requirements. The study explains
the role of quality assurance, which is a component
of all official and planned actions that gives
assurance that the result will be of the intended
quality level.
H3: Quality Assurance creates a positive
influence on Work Stress.
2.4 The Impact of Employee Engagement
on Work Stress
According to [30], concluded that Employee
engagement is correlated with a feeling of
emotional commitment to one's job and
organization, motivation, and capacity to contribute
one's best qualities to achievement from several
tangible advantages for both companies and
personnel. Burnout is positively influenced by
work stress, according to research done, which
indicates that the greater employee advancement
experiences stress, the greater the potential for
burnout, on the other hand, the lower the employee
experiences stress, the smaller the potential for
burnout. The conceptualization of stress regarding
individuals is hatred for the environmental
characteristics that employees will face, which
includes threats that employees are likely to
encounter while working in a company. In Social
Welfare Institutions (LKS) stress may be one of the
causes of problems that occur. For this reason,
appropriate handling is needed to reduce work
stress for each employee, and to fulfill
organizational objectives.
H4: The positive effects of employee engagement
and Work Stress.
2.5 The Impact of Work Stress on Burnout.
According to [31], the sense of pressure at work
discomfort encountered by someone who presses or
feels pressured in dealing with their environment
and work. Stress that arises related to work can be
in the form of a response of a person to
expectations and job pressure they experience but
do not engage in accordance with their insight &
abilities. In this case, it seems that the greater the
demands and workload pressures aren’t in
accordance with the worker's skill set and insight,
the more elevated the likelihood that they will
experience work stress, and vice versa. Considering
the findings of research performed, evidence that
there is a positive impact between employee
engagement on work stress, which means that if
you cannot balance employee involvement, then
employees will experience stress at work.
H5: Work Stress generates a favorable effect on
Burnout.
2.6 The Impact of Quality Assurance on
Burnout is mediated by Work Stress.
Based on findings from research conducted by [32],
which showed the impact of quality control on
stress-related burnout, proving that quality
assurance is highly influential in burnout. The
findings of this study suggest that quality assurance
that occurs in the company has an influence on the
nature of burnout where work stress is the
mediating variable. Employees feel that quality
assurance in the company has not been paid
attention to so there are still many employees who
experience work burnout, [33]. Use opportunities to
improve patient care and resolve identified
problems. Studies carried out, show that there is a
favorable influence of quality assurance on job
stress, therefore it is necessary to appeal to all
employees to be able to control themselves thus
they don't become stressed in doing a job.
According to this study, the activities required to
deliver high-quality work that complies with the
standards are part of the function of quality
assurance. Another function, namely quality
assurance is part of all planned and official
activities to provide confidence that the output will
meet the desired quality level.
H6: Quality Assurance generates a positive
impact on Burnout mediated by Work
Stress.
2.7 The Impact of Employee Engagement
on Burnout is mediated Work Stress
The findings of a study by [34], which shows the
impact of employee engagement on burnout via
work stress, prove that employee engagement is
highly influential in burnout. The findings of this
study suggest that employee involvement that
occurs in the company has an influence on the
nature of burnout where job stress is the mediating
variable. Employees feel that the amount of
pressure at work can provide prolonged stress. A
work bond that is fully involved in a job in full, is
responsible not only for work, wants to prioritize
work, works earnestly, completes work without
procrastinating, and uses working hours as they
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1601
Volume 21, 2024
should. To achieve the goals of an organization,
employee engagement is something that is needed.
H7: Employee Engagement has a favorable effect
on Burnout mediated by Work Stress.
3 Methods of Research
The methodology of the research begins with
problem identifiers at the research location,
problem formulation, and basic theory development
to make a stronger basis for every element. A
saturation sampling method was employed in this
research, where the samples were taken from all
people in the population. Then SEM (Partial Least
Square) and the questionnaire method were used to
perform the survey. The study's participants were
caregivers for Social Welfare Institutions (LKS) in
Malang Regency, East Java, Indonesia, totaling 66
persons.
Both primary and secondary data were
gathered using online surveys that employed a
Likert scale. Independent of the mediator and
dependent factors, the items for each variable were
adopted from earlier studies with minor alterations,
[35]. Burnout is measured using emotional
exhaustion and; a decrease in prohibitions (reduced
personal achievements). Job stress is measured
using indicators of external aspects, which is a
disease that has an impact on a person's psychology
from outside himself; internal aspects with
indicators are a condition caused by conflicts or
obstacles that occur within. Quality Assurance is
measured using design indicators; suitability;
availability; security (security); and field use
(practical benefit). Furthermore, Employee
Engagement is measured using the vigor indicator
(enthusiasm); devotion (dedication); and absorption
(preoccupation).
Before being used, the questionnaire underwent
reliability and validity tests. Economic and
psychological test results can be analyzed using
structural equation modeling (SEM), which
causally assesses additive models with been
theoretically verified, [36]. PLS-SEM data analysis,
which is based on the Covariance Approach SEM
(CB-SEM) and PLS-SEM, has advantages and
limitations, notably with regard to the assumption
and subsequent fit statistics. The following
prerequisites must be satisfied to use CB-SEM: 1) a
big sample; 2) data with a normal distribution; 3)
indications of reflective constructs; and 4) trigger
variables (errors), which appear when a program
doesn't provide results because of a lack of
identifying the model, [37]. PLS-SEM, on the other
hand, can overcome this by building complex
models of causal relationships using latent
variables. Multivariate statistical statistics, which
simultaneously manage a large number of
explanatory and response variables, are immune to
it or resistant to it, [38].
4 Results and Discussion
The results of data processing, [39], in Table 1,
showed that out of 66 respondents, there were 41
(62.1%) males and 25 (37.9%) females. The
majority of respondents, namely 5 (7.6%), were the
ages of <20, while 23 (34.8%) were between 21 to
30, while 7 (10,6%) were the age of 31 to 40, while
20 (30,3%) were the age of 41 to 50, and 11
(16,7%) were the age of >51. Regarding the level
of education, as many as 19 (28.8%) respondents
had completed the Senior High School, while 31
(47.0%) had an S1 level, while 16 (24.2%) had an
S2 level. In terms of work experience, the highest
number of respondents, 26 (39.4%), had a working
time of 3-5 years, while 3 (4.5%) had a recent
length of service <1 years. In the Table 2 (Model
Goodness of Fit), look at the tested R-Square
(Goodness of Fit/GoF) in (R2). the right way to
assess this type using PLS, R2 should be observed
for each latent variable that has been allocated,
[40].
Table 1. Respondents’ characteristics
No.
Gender
Education Level
Work Period
1.
Male = 41 (62.1%)
Senior High School
= 19 (28.8%)
<1 = 3 (4.5%)
2.
Female = 25 (37.9%)
S1 = 31 (47.0%)
1 3 = 17 (25.8%)
3.
S2 = 16 (24.2%)
3 5 = 26 (39.4%)
4.
>5 = 20 (30.3%)
5.
Sources: Process Data
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1602
Volume 21, 2024
Table 2. Model Goodness of Fit
Variable
AVE
Composite Reliability
Alpha Cronbach
R-2
Burnout
0.644
0.878
0.814
0.766
Employee Engagement
0.530
0.916
0.893
-
Quality Assurance
0.565
0.901
0.871
Work Stress
0.532
0.887
0.850
0,501
Sources: Process Data
According to [41], Table 2, Model Goodness of
Fit so R2 value of 0.75 denotes a strong
relationship, 0.50 is a moderate one, and 0.25 is a
poor one. 0.02 represents little, 0.35 represents
medium, and 0.35 represents big in terms of
predictive relevance (Q2). The GoF model is tested
using Predictive Relevance (Q2) on the inner
model. It is thought to have predictive importance
where (Q2) is a number bigger than zero.
In the structural model, Table 3. testing the
direct effect and mediating test, [42], the expected
values for the path linkages must be important. It is
possible to find the significance value for these
hypotheses using the bootstrapping process by
reviewing the parameter coefficient values and the
significance value for the T-statistic from the
bootstrapping report technique, the applicability of
the proposed theory can be determined. a
comparison of the T-table and T-count (T-
statistics), the T-table at alpha 0.05 (5%) = 1.96 can
be used to determine the relevance of the data. The
findings of the hypothesis testing revealed that
there is no significant relationship between the
variable of quality assurance and burnout,
Employee engagement has a negative and
significant impact on burnout, whereas quality
assurance has a positive and significant impact on
work stress, employee engagement has a negative
but insignificant impact on work stress, and work
stress has a positive and significant impact on
burnout. Work stress can mediate the impact of
employee engagement on burnout but not the
impact of quality assurance on burnout.
Mediating Analysis
The mediation analysis was conducted Using the
results of the PLS-SEM algorithm and the
bootstrapping technique, we applied direct, total,
and particular indirect, as well as total effect
values. Table 4 examines and lists the mediating
effect of work stress on the relationship between
quality assurance, employee Engagement, and
burnout.
The Bootstrapping of the test results is
presented in Figure 1. Also, the correctness and
dependability of each dimension and the indicators
used to measure each previously generated variable
were examined in the model. Since the composite
reliability must be greater than 0.70, it is possible
to define the dimensional analysis of the model by
describing the discriminant validity value,
evaluating the square root value of AVE (Average
Variance Extracted) with a boost value and loading
factor each > 0.5, construct validity, and Cronbach
Alpha, [43].
A high R2 number suggests a powerful
creation. Empirical research demonstrating the
proposed model's accuracy demonstrates this.
Similar to how every variable in the model satisfies
the requirements for discriminant validity, the AVE
value > 0.5 indicates this. When a variable's
Cronbach Alpha value exceeds 0.7 (> 0.70) and it
complies with the criteria for composite reliability,
it is deemed to be trustworthy, [44]. Every
indication processed in Table 2 is categorized as
invalid based on the measurement findings
obtained by factor analysis processing on indicators
from the dimensional models since the bulk of the
loading issue values are > 0.50 (more than 0.50).
5 Discussion
5.1 The Impact of Quality Assurance on
Burnout
Considering the results of this study, based on the
outcomes, a T-statistic value of 0.412, a P value of
0.680, and a -0.036 original sample value. The
value of the T-statistic is smaller than the 1.96 T-
table value, a sample's initial value shows a
negative value and the P value is greater than 0.05,
These findings suggest that Burnout is not much
impacted by quality assurance. The findings of this
study suggest that high-quality guarantees applied
by the company do not affect employee burnout.
Employees still feel physically and emotionally
exhausted in doing their work even though the
quality assurance implemented by the company is
good. Jobs with high risks and heavy workloads in
doing their jobs will not cause burnout for
employees, these results are supported by research,
[45], [46].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1603
Volume 21, 2024
Table 3. Testing the Direct Effect and Mediating Test
Sources: Process Data
Table 4. Mediating effect hypothesis
Description
Employee Engagement
Quality Assurance
Direct w/o Med
-0.577
-0.036
Direct w/Med
-0.209
-0.092
IV > Med Beta
0.510
0.485
Med > DV Beta
0.314
0.284
IV > Med SE
0.030
0.130
Med > DV SE
0.050
0.078
Sobel test statistic
3.106
1.740
One-tailed probability
0.000
0.005
Two-tailed probability
0.000
0.005
Result
Significant
Not Significant
Note: *p<. 05, **p<.01, ***p<0.001
Sources: Process Data
Fig. 1: Bootstrapping Test Results
Sources: Process Data
escription
Original
Sample
Standard
Deviation
T-
Statistics
P
Values
Remarks
Quality Assurance Burnout
-0.036
0.088
0.412
0.680
Not Significant
Employee Engagement Burnout
-0.577
0.136
4.249
0.000
Negative
Significant
Quality Assurance Work Stress
-0.229
0.114
2.002
0.046
Negative -
Significant
Employee Engagement Work Stress
-0.517
0.118
4.400
0.000
Negative -
Significant
Work Stress Burnout
0.404
0.126
3.198
0.001
Positive -
Significant
Mediating
Employee Engagement Work Stress
Burnout
-0.209
0.079
2.653
0.008
Negative
Significant
Quality Assurance Work Stress
Burnout
-0.092
0.057
1.614
0.107
Not - Significant
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1604
Volume 21, 2024
5.2 The Effect of Employee Engagement
on Burnout
Based on the study's hypothesis testing, a T-
statistic value of 4.249, an original sample value of
-0.577, and a P value of 0.000 were determined.
The original sample value exhibits a negative
value, the T-statistic value is more than the T-table
value of 1.96, and the P values are less than 0.05.
These findings suggest that employee involvement
has a negative and significant impact on burnout.
Employee engagement is a feeling of emotional
commitment to one's job and the company, which
motivates and enables one to give one's all to
contribute to the success of a number of tangible
advantages for both the institution and the person.
In this study, employees who have high
engagement will not easily experience burnout, and
vice versa, employees with low engagement will
easily experience burnout. Employees with a high
level of engagement mean they have the resilience
not to experience burnout easily. In addition, the
company must handle it by monitoring the situation
at hand and taking further action so that employees
do not experience burnout, because if many
employees experience burnout it will affect
employee performance and have a negative impact
not only on the targets set by the company but as
well as the continuity and development of the
company in the future. These results are reinforced
by research by [47], [48].
5.3 The Impact of Quality Assurance on
Work Stress
According to the results of the study's hypothesis
testing, the original sample value was -0.229, the
T-statistic was 2.002, and the P value was 0.046.
The original sample value displays a negative
value, the T-statistic value exceeds the T-table
value of 1.96, and the P values display less than
0.05, these results indicate quality assurance
negatively and significantly impacts how stressful
the job is. Quality assurance is the process of
auditing quality requirements to ensure that quality
standards have been applied to the products or
services offered. Companies that pay attention to
and need the rights of every employee will not
make employees feel stressed in the work they do.
Employees feel that the company has provided safe
and non-hazardous facilities at work so that they
can stick with their work even though the risk and
heavy workload will not make employees feel
stressed at work, these results are supported by
research by, [48], [49].
5.4 The Impact of Employee
Engagement on Work
Stress
Based on the results of the study's hypothesis
testing, the original sample value was -0.517, the
T-statistic was 4.400, and the P value was 0.000.
The original sample value displays a negative
value, the T-statistic value exceeds the T-table
value of 1.96, and the P values display less than
0.05, these Findings suggest employee engagement
negatively and significantly impacts work stress.
Employee engagement (employee engagement)
will make workers more disciplined and do their
jobs well so that work performance can be
maximized. Employees who have high engagement
will not cause stress at work. Employees will carry
out their duties diligently, seriously, and on time in
completing them so that they will be happy with
the tasks given and easily work under high
pressure. Bosses who provide inspiring motivation
will also increase attachment to employees so that
in the end work stress will not appear in employees.
These results are supported by research, [50], [51],
[52].
5.5 The Impact of Work Stress on Burnout
Based on the results of the study's hypothesis
testing, a T-statistic value of 3.198, an original
sample value of 0.404, and a P value of 0.001 were
determined. The T-statistic value exceeds the 1.96
T-table value, the original sample value exhibits a
positive value, and the P values indicate 0.05 or
less, these Findings suggest work stress has a
positive & significant impact on burnout. Long-
lasting stress is one of the factors contributing to
weariness and continuously so that individuals
experience emotional exhaustion and low
motivation to work. Job stress and burnout have a
real relationship, this is because stress can have a
negative or positive impact on individuals, if
individuals cannot manage stressful conditions then
distress will occur (unable to cope with stressful
conditions and tending to escape from problems)
and vice versa if individuals are able changing
stressful conditions into positive energy will result
in eustress (trying to find a solution to the
problem). If an employee can manage these
stressful conditions with positive energy, then this
stress can be minimized so that employees do not
experience burnout at work. These results are
supported by previous research, namely research
from, [53], [54], [55].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1605
Volume 21, 2024
5.6 The Impact of Employee Engagement
on Burnout through Work Stress
According to the results of the study's hypothesis
testing, the original sample value was -0.209, the
T-statistic value was 2.653, and the P value was
0.008. The original sample value displays a
negative value, the P values reveal less than 0.05,
and the T-statistic value exceeds the T-table value
of 1.96, these Findings suggest employee
engagement negatively and significantly impacts
burnout through work stress. By focusing attention
between leaders and subordinates in providing
more inspiring motivation and enthusiasm so that
employees can minimize the occurrence of burnout
at work, the impact will occur on low stress felt by
employees. Employees who perceive their work as
something that makes them proud and happy will
be able to suppress feelings of emotional
exhaustion in each employee. This can happen
because of the small level of stress in their work. In
the category of work stress, employees often think
about their work even when they are working so
that they have high dedication to their work, which
will lead to less burnout at work because they feel
high dedication to their work in the company.
These results are supported by the research of [56],
[57].
5.7 The Impact of Quality Assurance on
Burnout through Work Stress
Based on the findings of this study's hypothesis
testing, a T-statistic value of 1.614, a P value of
0.107, and an initial sample value of -0.092. The
original sample value displays a negative value, the
T-statistic value is less than the T-table value of
1.96, and the p-value is more than 0.05, these
Findings suggest quality assurance doesn't have a
big impact on burnout through work stress. This
study shows that the quality assurance applied in
the company does not affect employee burnout.
Employees will feel emotional exhaustion at work
even though the stress they feel is at a lower level.
This can happen because the burnout value such
that it is at a high level even though employees are
happy and proud of their work and the stress
caused has a low average value, employees will
still feel burnout at their jobs in the company.
These results are supported by research by [58],
[59].
6 Conclusions
This study examines and analyzes variables related
to quality assurance, employee engagement, job
stress, and burnout. The results of this study were
obtained from caring for Social Welfare Institutions
(LKS) Malang Regency - East Java. The following
conclusions can be drawn from the study's
calculation results:
Quality assurance has no significant effect on
burnout for Social Welfare Institution (LKS)
employees Malang Regency. Employee
engagement has a profoundly negative impact on
burnout, thus the better the implementation of work
engagement lower the level of there is employee
burnout. Quality assurance has an important
negative effect on the impact of work stress on
Malang Regency employee's Social Welfare
Institution (LKS). As a result, the better quality
assurance that occurs in the company will minimize
work stress on employees. Meanwhile, employee
engagement has stress at work is significantly
increased, the better the rankings of employee
engagement felt at work by staff, the lessening of
level of work stress.
Work stress has a substantial positive impact
on burnout which implies that the more affordable
the level of work stress for employees, the more
affordable the burnout level will be. Employee
engagement has a substantial negative impact on
burnout through work stress. Quality assurance
burnout is not significantly impacted by work
stress.
6.1 Limitations
This study focuses on caregivers a sample uses a
scale with one dimension. Nevertheless, further
research may result in better using a bigger sample
and taking into the use of a more comprehensive
multidimensional scale.
References:
[1] Rohman, F., Noermijati, N., Soelton, M. &
Mugiono, M. (2023). The role of quality
assurance in improving the distribution of
organizational performance. Uncertain
Supply Chain Management. Vol 11 (2023)
237248 Growing Science Ltd. All rights
reserved,
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.10.003.
[2] Soelton, Mochamad; Noermijati,
Noermijati; Rohman, Fatchur; Mugiono,
Mugiono. (2021). Improving The
Performance of Non-Profit
Organizations. Academy of Strategic
Management Journal; Vol. 20, (2021): 1-13,
[Online].
https://www.abacademies.org/special-
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1606
Volume 21, 2024
issues/volume-20-special-issue-5-title-
leadership-organization-management.html
(Accessed Date: December 29, 2023).
[3] Ellya Susilowati (2022). Practices for
Protection of Abandoned Children in Child
Welfare Institutions. Socio Informa: Study of
Social Problems and Social Welfare Efforts.
Sosio Informa : Study of Social Problems and
Social Welfare Efforts, 8(01).
[4] Lee, Y. H., Woo, B., & Kim, Y. (2018).
Transformational leadership and
organizational citizenship behavior:
Mediating role of affective commitment.
International Journal of Sports Science &
Coaching, 13(3), 373382,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954117725286.
[5] Ikhsan Pangestuari, Subur Karyatun, Rillo
Permana Sultoni, Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Tegar Nurul Hidayat, Mochamad
Soelton.2023. Is it true that cyberloafing
behavior influences greater workload and
work stress? Journal of Finance and
Business. Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023), 214-277,
2023, https://doi.org/10.32524/jkb.v21i2.842.
[6] Soelton, Mochamad, Noermijati, N.,
Rohman, F., Mugiono, M., Aulia, I. N., &
Siregar, R. E. (2020). Reawakening
perceived person-organization fit and
perceived person-job fit: Removing obstacles
to organizational commitment. Management
Science Letters, 10(13), 29933002,
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.5.026.
[7] Susilowati, E. (2022). Practices for
Protection of Abandoned Children in Child
Welfare Institutions. Sosio Informa, 8(01).
[8] Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnely Jr.,
J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2006).
Organizations (Behavior, Structure,
Processes) (14th Ed.). United State of
America: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
[9] NN Syamsu, M Soelton, N., Andesna, L
Linggarnusantra, P Pebriani. 2019. How Role
Conflict and Workload Influence Employee
Performance with Burnout as an Intervening
Variable. Scientific Journal of Management
and Business. 5 (1), 1-13,
https://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jimb.v5i1.
[10] Wardani, L. M. I., & Firmansyah, R. (2019).
The Work-Life Balance of Blue-Collar
Workers: the Role of Employee Engagement
and Burnout. Journal of Ulayat Psychology,
6, 227241,
https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu02019-238.
[11] Maslach, C., Leiter, M. P., & Jackson, S. E.
(2012). Making a significant difference with
burnout interventions: Researcher and
practitioner collaboration. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 296300,
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.784.
[12] Salehi, M., and Gholtash, A. (2011). The
relationship between job satisfaction, job
burnout and organizational commitment with
the organizational citizenship behavior
among members of faculty in the Islamic
Azad University first district branches, in
order to provide the appropriate model.
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,
(15) 306-310,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.091.
[13] Mochamad Soelton, Alif Rafi
Nurfakhriansyah, Intan Apriadi, Harefan
Arief, Noermijati, Nico Alexander Vizano.
2022. Why is Burnout Behavior Worried by
Managers in the Manufacturing Industry?
INOBIS: Indonesian Journal of Business and
Management Innovation INOBIS: Indonesian
Journal of Business and Management
Innovation. Vol. 05, Nomor 04, September
2022,
https://doi.org/10.31842/jurnalinobis.v5i4.
[14] Chemali, Z., Ezzeddine, F. L., Gelaye, B.,
Dossett, M. L., Salameh, J., Bizri, M.,
Dubale, B., & Fricchione, G. (2019). Burnout
among healthcare providers in the complex
environment of the Middle East: A
systematic review. BMC Public Health,
19(1), 121, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-
019-7713-1.
[15] Liao, K.-H., & Huang, I.-S. (2016). Impact of
Vision, Strategy, and Human Resource on
Nonprofit Organization Service Performance.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
224, 2027,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.395
[16] Brend, D. M. (2020). Residential childcare
workers in child welfare and moral distress.
Children and Youth Services Review,
119(November), 105621,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105
621.
[17] Karyatun Subur, Tri Wahyono, Intan
Apriadi, Priyono Priyono, Harefan Arief,
Muhammad Andy Rachman Hakim,
Mochamad Soelton. 2023. Determinants of
Employee Performance in the Manufacturing
Industry. American International Journal of
Business Management (AIJBM) ISSN- 2379-
106X, Vol. 6, Issue 09 (Sept.-2023), pp.79-
89, [Online]. https://www.aijbm.com/current-
issue/ (Accessed Date: December 29, 2023).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1607
Volume 21, 2024
[18] Al-Fatlawi, S. H. (2018). Nationalists and
Environmentalists are Anti-Globalization
and the WTO. International Journal of Asian
Social Science, 8(5), 256-264,
https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.85.25
6.264.
[19] Lukito, L. H., & Alriani, I. M. (2019). The
Influence of Workload, Work Environment,
Work Stress on Employee Performance at
PT. Sinarmas Distribution Nusantara
Semarang. Journal of Management
Accounting Economics, 25(45).
[20] Adina-Petruţa, P., & Roxana, S. (2014).
Integrating six sigma with quality
management systems for the development
and continuous improvement of higher
education institutions. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 143, 643-648,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.456.
[21] Rohman, F., Noermijati, N., Soelton, M. &
Mugiono, M. (2023). The role of quality
assurance in improving the distribution of
organizational performance. Uncertain
Supply Chain Management. Vol 11 (2023)
237248 Growing Science Ltd. All rights
reserved,
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.10.003.
[22] Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison
of the efficacy of covariance-based and
variance-based SEM. International Journal
of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332344,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.00
1.
[23] Nurhayati, N., & Sudarsyah, A. (2021).
Quality Assurance of Burnout in Education.
In 4th International Conference on Research
of Educational Administration and
Management (ICREAM 2020), [Online].
https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/icesh/i
ndex (Accessed Date: December 29, 2023).
[24] Kristanti, E. (2017). The Influence of the
Physical Work Environment and Non-
Physical Work Environment on Work Stress
and Its Impact on Performance. Journal of
Management Science (JIM), 5(1).
[25] Hayati, I., & Fitria2, S. (2018). The Effect of
Burnout on Employee Performance at BMT
El-Munawar Medan. Intiqad: Journal of
Islamic Religion and Education, 10(1), 50
65,
https://doi.org/10.30596/intiqad.v10i1.1924.
[26] Yuarto, S. (2017). The Influence of
Employee Engagement on Burnout (Doctoral
dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada),
[Online].
http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/deta
il/130907 (Accessed Date: December 29,
2023).
[27] Rahmawati, D. D., & Pogo, T. (2023). The
Influence of a Non-Physical Work
Environment, Transformational Leadership,
and Work Motivation as Mediating Variables
on the Performance of State Civil Apparatus
in the Directorate General of Metal Industry,
Machinery, Transportation and Electronics:
.Indonesian Journal of Business
Analytics, 3(4), 11131140,
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v3i4.5232
[28] The Influence of Role Stressors on Burnout
and Differences in Burnout Based on
Gender: Empirical Study on College
Students. Maranatha Accounting Journal,
10(1), 6271,
https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v10i1.929.
[29] Bosk, E. A., Williams-Butler, A., Ruisard, D.,
& MacKenzie, M. J. (2020). Frontline Staff
Characteristics and Capacity for Trauma-
Informed Care: Implications for the Child
Welfare Workforce. Child Abuse and Neglect,
110(March), 104536,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104536.
[30] Arief Harefan, Tine Yuliantini, Muhammad
Shirhan Thoullon, Eri Marlapa, Mochamad
Soelton, Subur Karyatun, Siti Islah
Humaidah. 2023. Intimate Servant
Leadership and Transformational Leadership
Improve Organizational Citizenship
Behavior. American International Journal of
Business Management (AIJBM) ISSN: 2379-
106X, Vol. 6, Issue 10 (October.-2023),
pp.06-16, [Online].
https://www.aijbm.com/intimate-servant-
leadership-and-transformational-leadership-
improve-organizational-citizenship-behavior/
(Accessed Date: December 29, 2023).
[31] Aulia, I. N., Karyatun, S., Hidayat, R. R., &
Soelton, M. (2023). Don’t Be Afraid to
Change: Work Environment and Workload
Affects Cyberloafing Behavior. Archives of
Business Research, 11(9). 76-91, https://DOI:
10.14738/abr.119.15471.
[32] Abdous, M. H. (2009). E-Learning quality
assurance: a process-oriented lifecycle
model. Quality assurance in Education,
17(3), 281-295.
[33] Ellya Susilowati, Dewi, K., & Kartika, T.
(2019). Implementation of National
Parenting Standards in Child Welfare
Institutions in South Kalimantan
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1608
Volume 21, 2024
Province. Scientific Journal of Social Work
Policy and Services (Biyan), 1(1).
[34] Alkafaji, Y. A. (2007). Quality assurance
review programs of auditing firms: an
international perspective. Managerial
Auditing Journal, 22(7), 644-660.
[35] F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G.
Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least
squares structural equation modeling (PLS-
SEM) is An emerging tool in business
research. European Business Review, 26(2),
106-121.
[36] Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A
beginner’s guide to partial least squares
analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283
297,
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328031us0304_.
[37] Sarstedt, M., & Hwang, H. (2020). Advances
in composite-based structural equation
modeling. In Behaviormetrika (Vol. 47, Issue
1, pp. 213217). Springer,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237- 020-00105-
9.
[38] Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J.
(2009). An empirical comparison of the
efficacy of covariance-based and variance-
based SEM. International Journal of
Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332344,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.00
1
[39] Mariyana, T. (2017). Job Satisfaction with
Employee Engagement among PT
Employees. Triplast Agung
Sejahtera. Journal of Kariman, 5(2), 125-
136.
[40] Rizal, R., & Fipiariny, S. (2022). The
Influence of Employee Engagement and
Work Life Balance on Burnout in Workers in
the Health Sector in Palembang
City. Adminika, 8(1), 1-14.
[41] Hermiliah, H., Pahlawanti, W. D., & Fitria,
H. (2020). Increasing Quality Assurance
Towards Quality Education. In Proceedings
of the National Seminar on the Postgraduate
Program of the PGRI University of
Palembang, [Online].
https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/d
etail/1628499 (Accessed Date: December 29,
2023).
[42] Pratiwi, S.H.P., Martiana, T., Arini, S.Y.
2020. The Relation between Individual
Characteristics and Job Stress in PT. PAL
Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of
Occupational Safety and Health. Vol 9(3):
248-257. November
2020, https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v9i3.20
20.248-257.
[43] Andriansyah, A. (2019). Critical evaluation
of policies in supply chain performance:
Quality assurance, continuous process
improvement, and environmental regulation
and policies. Uncertain Supply Chain
Management 7,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.1.001.
[44] Cheong Cheng, Y. (2003). Quality assurance
in education: internal, interface, and future.
Quality assurance in Education, 11(4), 202-
213.
[45] Juran, J. M., & Gryna, F. M. (1988). Juran’s
Quality Control Handbook (4th Ed.). New
York: McGraw-Hill.
[46] Robbins, P. S. Dan Timothy A. Judge.
(2017). Organizational Behavior. Jakarta:
Salemba Empat.
[47] Erwina, E. (2020). Analysis of Employee
Engagement Through Vigor, Dedication and
Absorption Dimensions at PT. Sumber Graha
Sejahtera in Luwu Regency. Jemma (Journal
Of Economic, Management And
Accounting), 3(2), 173-180.
[48] Gadzali, S. S., Lestari, N., & Kurniawan, M.
A. (2020). The Effect of Work Stress on
Employee Performance at PTP VIII. The
World of Business Administration Journal.
[49] Lina, N. P. I. M. (2019). Analysis of the
Determining Factors of Employee
Engagement at PT. ABC Bandung. Ekuitas:
Journal of Economic Education, 7(2), 108-
116.
[50] Aung, M. M., & Chang, Y. S. (2014).
Temperature management for the quality
assurance of a perishable food supply chain.
Food Control, 40, 198-207
[51] llis, C., & Castle, K. (2010). Teacher
research as continuous process improvement.
Quality Assurance in Education, 18(4), 271-
285.
[52] Idris (2019). Exploring Organizational
Culture, Quality Assurance, and Performance
in Higher Education. Management and
Economics Journal, Vol.3 (2) 2019.
[53] Maryam, S., Sule, E. T., Joeliaty, J., &
Novianty Ariawaty, R. (2021). Effects of
Safety Climate and Employee Engagement
towards Organisational Citizenship
Behaviour of Sewage Workers. Asian
Journal of Business and Accounting, 14(1),
253275,
https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol14no1.10.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1609
Volume 21, 2024
[54] Ellya Susilowati , & Azzasyofia, M. (2020).
The parents stress level in facing children
study from home in the early of covid-19
pandemic in Indonesia. International journal
of science and society, 2(3), 1-12.
[55] Dewi, P. S. A., & Sriathi, A. A. A. (2019).
The Effect of Job Stress on Turnover
Intention Mediated by Job Satisfaction. E-
Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana,
8(6), 3646,
https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2019.v08.i
06.p13.
[56] Fearne, A., Hornibrook, S., & Dedman, S.
(2001). The management of perceived risk in
the food supply chain: a comparative study of
retailer-led beef quality assurance schemes in
Germany and Italy. The International Food
and Agribusiness Management Review, 4(1),
19-36.
[57] Jung, Y. Y., & Sembiring, J. (2019). The
Influence of Employee Engagement on the
Performance of BPJS Employment Bandung
Raya Employees. E-proceedings of
Management, 6(1).
[58] Utami, S. (2021). The Influence of Quality of
Work Life and Job Satisfaction on Employee
Engagement PT. Indonesian Railways
(Persero) Medan. Kohesi, 5(3), 96-101.
[59] Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski,
B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX
differentiation: A multilevel review and
examination of its antecedents and outcomes.
The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517534,
https://doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
Conceptualization, E.S. and M .S.;
Methodology, E.S., M.S. and E.T.P.S.;
Validation, E.S., M.S. and E.T.P.S.;
Formal analysis, E.S., M.S. and K.N.S.;
Investigation, K . N . S . and N.V.;
Resources, K . N . S . and N.V.;
Writingoriginal draft preparation, E.S., M.S. and
E.T.P.S.;
Writingreview and editing, E.S., M.S. and
E.T.P.S.;
Visualization E.T.P.S.;
Supervision, E.S. and M.S. ;
Project administration, K . N . S ., N.V. and
E.T.P.S.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
This work, all funding for this research is borne by
all authors
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.e
n_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.130
Ellya Susilowati, Subur Karyatun,
Eko Tama Putra Saratian,
Mochamad Soelton, Nike Vonika
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1610
Volume 21, 2024